Supreme Court Decision To Not Hear Appeal Basically Extends DREAMers Past March 5 Deadline
“The DACA program – which provides work permits and myriad government benefits to illegal immigrants en masse – is clearly unlawful,” Shah said. “The district judge’s decision to unilaterally re-impose a program that Congress had explicitly and repeatedly rejected is a usurpation of legislative authority. The fact that this occurs at a time when elected representatives in Congress are actively debating this policy only underscores that the district judge has unwisely intervened in the legislative process.”
Last month, U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco ruled that DACA must remain in place while litigation surrounding the program is ongoing. U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in New York ruled earlier this month that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had "erred in concluding that DACA is unconstitutional."
-
2:07
KMGH
4 years agoDreamers case heading to Supreme Court
20 -
2:58
Newsy
4 years agoSupreme Court Blocks Trump's Bid To End Protections For 'Dreamers'
3.2K1 -
1:33
KNXV
6 years agoJudge rules against ending DACA program to protect Dreamers
1 -
1:58
ConservativeTribune
6 years agoFed-Up AZ Supreme Court Hits Dreamers with Costly Bad News in Blowout Ruling
2 -
0:47
Newsy
5 years agoSupreme Court Will Most Likely Not Hear Trump's DACA Appeal
27 -
2:34
KNXV
7 years agoArizona court overturns in-state tuition for DREAMers
30 -
1:05
Newsy
5 years agoAppeals Court Rules Trump Administration Can't Immediately End DACA
26 -
0:51
Newsy
6 years agoFederal Appeals Court Will Soon Rule On Decision To End DACA
-
1:08
OpsLensNewsChannel
6 years agoFederal Judge Rules Against Trump On DACA Decision
98 -
2:34
KNXV
7 years agoArizona court overturns in-state tuition for DREAMers
29