193: Publisher fears are coming to fruition, plus 2 paths forward
Back at the dawn of the internet, publishers were concerned that blogs and other “user generated content” would create too much competition and erode the value of their products. Those fears are materializing in spades.
Troy Young’s analysis in his Feb. 14th email, "The Next Internet," is very good, and relevant to this point.
Seek vs. Served. Troy characterizes the old internet as "seek.” If I wanted to know something, I would enter a query, skim through a list of results, then “go” to some web page. The developing internet, by contrast, is "be served." The content comes to me, e.g., through a chat interface.
I would like to subdivide the “be served” internet into two models.
Model #1 involves nameless, faceless, brandless “content” that is slurped up by AI and then regurgitated / served to meet the reader’s needs. It’s not even “the commodification of content” because the AI isn’t paying for it. They just steal it. Everything goes in the database and the chatbot or your personalized AI will decide how to present it to you. The content creator is lost in the process.
Model #2 has a name and a face. It’s Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Chris Cuomo, and Piers Morgan interpreting the world for you. It’s not “find me the best recipe for French Onion Soup,” or even “what should I cook for dinner tonight,” it’s “what’s Gordon Ramsay eating today?”
Both models will grow side by side in the coming months, but they both rely on content creators to feed the system. Model #1 filters content with an algorithm. Model #2 filters it through a personality.
How do the content creators get paid? In Model #1, most of them don’t. Maybe that’s becoming an outdated concept – at least for the majority of content. In Model #2, the original creators might get a shout out, but the talking head can make money through ads, memberships, subscriptions, etc. Joe Rogan is making a killing.
Publishers like to say that we need experts to create valuable content,
but right now millions of people are uploading content to the internet. Most of it is garbage, some of it is very good, but for the vast majority of content creators there is no reasonable expectation of being paid. They do it because they like it, or they do it the way most people buy a lottery ticket, on the exceedingly unlikely chance they'll hit the number.
What about experts? It’s not clear how much people care whether they’re getting content from an expert. It’s often more a matter of trust in someone because they align with the reader’s preconceptions.
What publishers feared in the early days of the internet – that amateur content (“blogs” in those days) would supplant the need for professional content – is happening on an accelerated basis. And then there’s AI.
How will publishers survive this? I don’t know, but two options come to mind immediately.
* Become the AI tool.
* Become the celebrity personality.
-
LIVE
Graham Allen
1 hour agoZuckerberg ADMITS They Rigged Everything! Kamala Wants Out Of Debates! + Tulsi Joins The MAGAvengers
10,052 watching -
LIVE
Matt Kohrs
8 hours agoZuckerberg Admits To Election Interference || The MK Show
2,678 watching -
LIVE
BonginoReport
3 hours agoYoung Men Abandon Democrats As War On Masculinity Backfires (Ep.30) - 08/27/24
8,198 watching -
LIVE
Wendy Bell Radio
4 hours agoDemocrats Are Walking Away
11,282 watching -
LIVE
Major League Fishing
4 days agoLIVE! - General Tire Team Series: Challenge Cup - Day 3
684 watching -
1:40:48
Game On!
17 hours agoRobert Barnes speaks on the upcoming 2024 NFL and CFB seasons!
7.52K3 -
8:31
Vigilant News Network
19 hours agoRFK Jr. Unleashes a STORM on the Democratic Party | Beyond the Headlines
7.41K14 -
15:05
NC Dirt Hunter
1 day agoAn Incredible discovery on a Colonial Plantation. This one is special #metaldetecting #history
9.54K9 -
10:33
RealReaper
1 day ago $0.07 earnedThe Crow 2024 Is Pure Cringe
7.55K8 -
17:30
ScammerRevolts
16 hours agoScammers Get RACIST After I Delete Their Files!
10K3