Dr Tess Lawrie on Corruption of the World Health Organization

Tedros, leader in a Marxist terror organisation in Africa who became spokesperson for the globalist agenda via the World Health Organization, speaks of lies, misinformation and con-spy-racee theories, in hope that you will consider him a highly trustworthy person who should be placed in a position of power over the health advice and care you receive.

Meanwhile, people such as Dr Tess Lawrie, a medical doctor and PhD specialising in evidence based medicine, are allegedly "misinformation conspyracee theorists". Dr Lawrie's peer-reviewed publications have received in excess of 4000 citations and her ResearchGate score is among the top 5% of ResearchGate members.

Dr Lawrie spoke at an Exit The WHO conference in Dublin on 6 February 2024.

This is what she wrote in connection to her speech:

Negotiations are taking place to significantly expand the control of the World Health Organization (WHO) over global public health responses and thinking via a) amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), and b) a pandemic treaty/accord (WHO CA+). Both instruments can be seen as complementary.

While the submitted IHR amendments, if approved, would greatly enhance the powers of the WHO as well as its Director-General (or their financiers) vis-à-vis states and non-state actors, the pandemic treaty in its current form would create a new, cost-intensive supranational bureaucracy and impose an ideological framework under which to operate in matters of global health.

The World Health Assembly has set a deadline of May 2024 for putting the proposed amendments to the IHR and the pandemic treaty to a vote.

The proposed IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty (WHO CA+) – if agreed upon – will inevitably be used to advance the interests of a few powerful actors at the expense of others. They represent an unprecedented attempt at legalising the concentration of undemocratic power under false pretence that necessitates a swift, effective and robust response. The envisioned legal framework for monopoly power over aspects of global public health will not lead to better pandemic preparedness but to a repetition of some of the worst decisions taken during COVID in the event of a declared emergency in the future.

One of the worst decisions made during COVID – and promoted by the WHO, among others – was to impose an mRNA product that was still in the experimental phase on populations, including children and babies.

My team and I are in the process of systematically analysing the WHO's own VigiAccess database that lists adverse reactions reported by people after taking a drug or vaccine. In this data, there is a clear signal that the COVID vaccines have caused significant harm and death in a part of its recipients. Until now, neither the WHO nor national governments have come to terms with that.

Instead of handing those responsible – including the compromised WHO leadership – more undemocratic and unaccountable power, let us strive to implement a better way!

For more information please see:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/policy/

VIDEO SOURCE: https://twitter.com/lawrie_dr/status/1757462822114492754