9/11 Thought Experiments
911Revisionist
- 10 / 50
1
A structural collapse vs controlled demo vs a disintegration on a molecular level
3:35

A structural collapse vs controlled demo vs a disintegration on a molecular level

A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment Put on your thinking caps students Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/a-911-thought-experiment Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for Was every BOOM on 9/11 a bomb? Not everything that goes boom is a bomb. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/was-every-boom-a-bomb-on-911
2 comments
2
Dismantling the 9/11 Collapse & Controlled Demolition Theories
2:35:29

Dismantling the 9/11 Collapse & Controlled Demolition Theories

The points we covered; 1. Structural collapse vs. controlled demolition - 2 min 50 sec 2. Structural integrity of the twin towers - 6 min 3. What we think we saw - 13 min 4. Who is Dr Judy Wood? - 16 min 30 sec 5. Lack of rubble - 21 min 6. Survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower between floors 2 and 22 - 27 min 7. Artifacts in the rubble. Where are the items to be expected? - 33 min 8. Basement is mostly intact and undamaged so if a controlled demolition, why were basements intact if explosives were not there? - 40 min 9. Seismic readings on all buildings. King Dome comparison. What is expected? What was measured? - 48 min 10. Building 6 pulled - 58 min 11. Building 7 BBC reported 20min prior to collapse BUT CNN reported it one hour prior - 1h 02min Building 7 and no explosive sounds - 1h 05min 13. Building 7 and the ongoing fuming at the world trade center - 1h 08min 14. Spontaneous combustion of things like oxygen tanks in ambulances - 1h 11min 15. Cars combusting randomly - 1h 14min 16. What about other buildings 3,4, 5, 6, and bankers buildings? Eight buildings were affected. The outcome of these building had no event like planes… What happened? 1h 18min 17. No heat - The rubble pile was COLD! - 1h 21 min 18. No pictures of molten metal. No evidence of it. - 1h 25min 19. Class 4 Hurricane Erin off coast. What can this mean? - 1h 33min 20. Magnetic field anomalies for each and every event - 1h 35min 21. Not everything that glows are hot and scientist John Hutchison replicating Nicola Tesla’s work and is famous for his “Hutchison Effect” - 1h 44min 22. Radio frequency technology now referred to as Directed Energy Weapons or Scalar waves and Lieutenant Colonel Tom E. Bearden - 1h 56min 23. The thermite lie - 2h 02min 24. Cold fusion is dangerous - 2h 16min 30sec 25. 60 Minutes on “Cold Fusion is Hot Again”. Dr. Rob Duncan, University of Missouri independent audit of research on cold fusion - 2h 24min 26. If cold fusion exists, how would it change the world? - 2h 29min Please find original upload here: https://rumble.com/v6tbgg9-countering-the-911-theory-of-controlled-demolition.html Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11 Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled My interview with Maryann Gebauer, is now available on Dr Morgan Reynolds' website https://nomoregames.net/2025/05/13/interview-countering-the-theory-of-controlled-demolition/
 1.16K  views 2 comments
3
But, but, but, but the "experts" told me thermite took down the Towers!
1:06

But, but, but, but the "experts" told me thermite took down the Towers!

Well, you've bought into the bullshit! Most people never really think about what they are being presented with AND they never go and double check the information given to them. According to the calculations of the architects for an engineered truth, it would take 29 000 metric tonnes of thermite FOR EACH tower to be taken down. Yes, you read correctly - 29 000 metric tonnes!! Let's do an experiment with 100lbs thermite and see what it looks like. The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/ You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf Your guide to debunking thermite on 9/11 Molten Steel and Thermite has never been taken to court Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/your-guide-to-debunking-thermite Thermite Revisited & Demolished in 2024 Aerospace Engineer discusses the truth about thermite and September 11, 2001 Presentation: https://911revision.substack.com/p/thermite-revisited-and-demolished Anatomy of a 9/11 Thermite Brainwashing Operation I recently discovered the existence of an e-book from 2010 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-911-thermite-brainwashing
3 comments
4
The missing 9/11 earth shattering BOOMS & light show
2:49

The missing 9/11 earth shattering BOOMS & light show

Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out! What we saw on 9/11 was not due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/controlled-demolition-expert-speaks Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
2 comments
5
For those who have bought into the “bombs & thermite on 9/11” narrative.
7:16

For those who have bought into the “bombs & thermite on 9/11” narrative.

(I once did too, but then I stopped outsourcing my thinking) Just how much thermite would be needed for EACH tower? What are the ingredients of thermite? What was the construction materials of the towers? Why do the people selling the bomb and thermite narrative NOT want you to count past 3? They only talk about the towers and building 7. What about the 9/11 orphans that cannot be explained by bombs, thermite or nukes? If you bought into the nuke narrative, you’re even more bamboozled than those that bought the bomb and thermite narrative. Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," and the nuke theorists, the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion". – Prof David A. Hughes Article: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-judy-wood-0ce The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone Link: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/ You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
 1.38K  views 7 comments
6
The Lack of Rubble at the World Trade Center
5:16

The Lack of Rubble at the World Trade Center

Watch the full documentary: https://rumble.com/v4a8ixu-911-the-best-explainer-documentary-youll-ever-see.html Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers Showing you just how easily people are duped, who don't know any better Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/myanmar-provides-a-911-lesson-for
1 comment
7
9/11 Liars for Truth
2:50:42

9/11 Liars for Truth

3 hours – A cut down version of “Observable Evidence.” Focuses on the Truth Movement. Download full series here: https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AIp6HUM6YH5rqM0&id=88862EF47BCAF6CD%21150377&cid=88862EF47BCAF6CD
5 comments
8
What makes a 9/11 truth seeker?
9:48

What makes a 9/11 truth seeker?

Why are people afraid to seek REAL truth? Why keep your head buried in the sand? 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness. People need to realise, they live in a time where their perceptions are being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily to the government and MSM and in turn the so called "truther" movement - As there are bad actors in the alternative media, aka "truther" movements, especially when it comes to the events of September 11, 2001. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11: 1. POOR Problem solving skills 2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd) 3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true)
2 comments
9
9/11 A conclusive body of evidence vs a belief or a theory / hypothesis
4:46

9/11 A conclusive body of evidence vs a belief or a theory / hypothesis

Most people struggle with wrapping their heads around a conclusive body of evidence vs a belief or a theory / hypothesis. There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11: 1. POOR Problem solving skills 2. Group Think (Peer Pressure, running with the herd) 3. They just can't handle the implications (they wish it weren't true) You live in a time where your perception is being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily. 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.
Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
3:56:15

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001. I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/ Let’s go! This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30 Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down… 1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30) 2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns. Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33) 3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges. Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30) 4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW. Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30) 5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32) 6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires. Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23) 7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW. Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08) 8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures. Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56) 9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents. Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15) 10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis. Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well) Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking… Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15
6 comments
11
9/11 and the flawed peer review process
1:37

9/11 and the flawed peer review process

Peer Review is academia, not science - We'll die due to stupidity
12
9/11 - Pools of molten metal and hot rubble disinformation
3:52

9/11 - Pools of molten metal and hot rubble disinformation

You've been lied to your government and the 9/11 "truther" movement. The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3 Official narrative – Jet fuel. Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/nuking-the-steel-of-the-twin-towers Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement? What happens if you ask TRUTH questions? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
3 comments
13
Were the twin towers & building 7 a conventional controlled demolition on 9/11?
5:52

Were the twin towers & building 7 a conventional controlled demolition on 9/11?

Thought experiment. Conventional controlled demolitions vs what we saw on Sept 11, 2001. Can you spot the difference? What do you hear or don't hear when comparing the two towers to conventional controlled demolitions? Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement? What happens if you ask TRUTH questions? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
1 comment
14
9/11 Truth - Richard Gage vs Andrew Johnson
7:01

9/11 Truth - Richard Gage vs Andrew Johnson

REFUTATION OF GAGE'S GAME 15 years ago and again in 2023. No more nails needed for this coffin!! Read this June 2023 article by Elsa Schieder, PhD, who hosted Gage on her truth summit. Article: https://elsaiselsa.substack.com/p/dr-judy-wood-refutation-of-gages-game
15
9/11 A Spire Thought Experiment
5:42

9/11 A Spire Thought Experiment

Why was there no loud explosions on 9/11 when the towers disintegrated into dust, like one would expect in a conventional controlled demolition? Watch the video. It's a thought experiment. 🤔 You see the tower seems to be peeled open like a banana, leaving some of the solid steel core spire standing for a few seconds, before the approximately 900 foot tall structure just seems to dissolve down vertically over where 16 people survived in stairwell B between the 2nd and 22nd floor. Then let's compare that solid steel spire to a conventional controlled demolition of a steel bridge. See the problem with the narrative trying to be sold to you that it's some sort of demolition using explosives or thermite? 16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF they are gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.
16
9/11 Discussion Flagged by YouTube as "hate speech"
38:28

9/11 Discussion Flagged by YouTube as "hate speech"

This original interview was redacted to take out anything covid related... DEW Downs WTC: 9/11 False Flag Turned Towers Into Dust Stew Peters Network Sept 11, 2023 - https://rumble.com/v3gwqm2-directed-energy-weapon-downs-wtc-911-false-flag-turned-towers-into-dust.html Where did the Twin Tower debris go? Andrew Johnson is here to talk about direct energy weapons being used to dustify the World Trade Center on 9/11. The people who believe the official government backed 9/11 narrative are the same people who believe the government is here to help. Andrew Johnson knows the Twin Towers were mostly turned to dust. Even the New York Times tried to explain away the dust phenomena. Dr. Judy Wood has done an independent forensic study of the observable evidence and has concluded that the towers dustified on 9/11 as a result of the use of black ops technology, a COLD DEW, that that can affect the molecular bonds of matter. Initially, Andrew believed the official government backed 9/11 narrative. Then, he believed that the towers were downed using pre-placed explosives. Eventually, Andrew rejected these theories after he watched a film called “911 The Great Illusion”. The film demonstrated the towers disappearing over the course of 9 seconds. 80% to 90% of the steel turned to dust in a matter of seconds. The thermite theory made popular over the years doesn't make sense because thermite is incendiary and not an explosive. The thermite theory seems to be controlled by opposition and misinformation. Dr. Judy Wood believes beyond a shadow of a doubt that Direct Energy Weapons were used on September 11, 2001. The people who jumped off the buildings is also a mystery. Many of the people may have also turned to dust and there are some very gruesome stories that back these claims. Andrew Johnson agrees that the evidence is conclusive and Direct Energy Weapons were used to destroy the Twin Towers. Read Dr Wood’s book, Where did the Towers go? - https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/ For more information on Andrew Johnson’s research go to http://CheckTheEvidence.com
17
The 9/11 prediction war
31:38

The 9/11 prediction war

There has been a massive argument on X with regards to Alex Jones and Bill Cooper predicting 9/11... An interesting timeline: - March 4, 2001 - The pilot episode of "The Lone Gunman", aired with a foiled attack on the World Trade Center - March 6, 2001 - Alex Jones discusses FBI and War games and flying a plane into the World Trade Center - June 28, 2001 - Bill Cooper discusses Osama Bin Laden will be made out to be the boogieman if a massive attack happens on US soil (November 6. 2001 he is shot dead by cops at his home) - July 25, 2001 - Alex Jones disses if there is an attack involving planes, it will be an inside job and it will probably be pinned on Osama Bin Laden Let's just say Bill Cooper wasn't vey fond of Alex Jones and many have called Alex Jones out as a limited hangout with regards to the actual truth of the events of 9/11 in later years... Here is a montage on the 9/11prediction war and where it is believed Alex Jones to be wrong on 9/11...
 1.1K  views
18
9/11 & Blinded by the light
13:19

9/11 & Blinded by the light

May 2023 - There was a zoom call hosted by Colorado 9/11 Truth, trying to push a paper called “The Case for Propelled Demolition at the Twin Towers”, using thermite... Not peer reviewed or published ANYWHERE... I had a question, actually 6, but they only read 3 of them... Let us breakdown one of my questions in this video... The question: You also touch on “A partial list of refuted hypotheses” regards WHAT happened. I am interested in your criticism of DEW… I’ve read Dr Wood’s book and she discussed the lack of seismic readings, and she also refers to the changes of the earth’s magnetic field. Do you have any thoughts on this? (Notice he did not address these to statements) Because if you look at the core coulombs where the survivors where, they weren’t bent, bolts weren’t ripped out and on the one tower’s remains, you had some of the wee-checks that came unbolted in the middle of a grid? How would you explain this?
19
9/11 The Molten Metal / Thermite Perception Management
6:03

9/11 The Molten Metal / Thermite Perception Management

The stories of molten metal and thermite are part of a perception management operation...
20
9/11 Propelled Demolition - Perception Management
17:08

9/11 Propelled Demolition - Perception Management

You live in a time where your perception is being managed. Just like with Covid from 2020 to 2023, people outsourced their thinking way too easily. 9/11 was an attack on human consciousness.
21
9/11 and the Thermite Conspiracy (2010)
10:54

9/11 and the Thermite Conspiracy (2010)

Humankind has made a major scientific discovery by learning to manipulate matter using directed energy in a new and extremely powerful way. This is one of the most important scientific discoveries since the nuclear fission technology that was used to create the atomic bomb. It is an irrefutable fact that directed energy technology was used to transform the WTC buildings to fine dust in midair on 9/11/2001. This inescapable conclusion is revealed by the large and conclusive body of verifiable, physical evidence from 9/11, and is overwhelmingly proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
22
That time Jesse Ventura read a book on 9/11
8:12

That time Jesse Ventura read a book on 9/11

Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
23
Demolishing Dr Greg Jenkins
14:41

Demolishing Dr Greg Jenkins

3 comments
24
9/11 Truth: Meet "Captain Thermite" Dr Steven E. Jones
11:11

9/11 Truth: Meet "Captain Thermite" Dr Steven E. Jones

The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory People are so easily led by perceived "experts". Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3 Official narrative – Jet fuel. Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/nuking-the-steel-of-the-twin-towers Is the 9/11 "truth" movement a distraction movement? What happens if you ask TRUTH questions? Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/questions-for-the-911-truther-talking
25
Why revisit 9/11?
16:59

Why revisit 9/11?

Did cv-19 not teach you in the last 3 years that your perception is being managed to take your "freedoms" away? What happened to the citizens of the world on Sept 11, 2001?
26
Evidence vs Theory: Perception Management
15:10

Evidence vs Theory: Perception Management

9/11 Was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event. Your perception of the events on September 11, 2001 are being managed by a disingenuous 9/11 "truther" movement. Don't outsource your thinking!
27
9/11 Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction: A Tribute To Tom Clancy And The "Demolition" Of WTC 7
14:59

9/11 Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction: A Tribute To Tom Clancy And The "Demolition" Of WTC 7

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt Building 7 - the Ted Walter cut. International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/building-7-the-ted-walter-cut Was every BOOM a bomb on 9/11? Not everything that goes boom is a bomb. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/was-every-boom-a-bomb-on-911 The controlled demolition of the thermite & nuke theory Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
28
9/11 - Revisiting the basements of the WTC.
13:32

9/11 - Revisiting the basements of the WTC.

Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-basements-of-the-wtc The mostly EMPTY basements of the Twin Towers. Most people have been led to believe the lie that the basements were full of rubble. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-mostly-empty-basements-of-the For a more detailed analysis of what was found in the basements, you need to read the book: Where did the Towers go? (pages 45 to 60) https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/ This video by realityAXIS also goes into great depth of the THE FIRES OF PROPAGANDA THAT "BURNED" UNDERGROUND FOR MONTHS. https://youtu.be/4DnIp8384fo
29
Sept 11, 2001 - Where did it go?
6:56

Sept 11, 2001 - Where did it go?

Check out my substack: https://911revision.substack.com/
30
September 12, 2001 - The Ultimate RED PILL
7:47

September 12, 2001 - The Ultimate RED PILL

Read my substack: https://911revision.substack.com/
2 comments
31
A 9/11 Rubble Pile Question
6:42

A 9/11 Rubble Pile Question

Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-disingenuous-search-for-911-justice
32
The disingenuous search for 9/11 Justice
11:30

The disingenuous search for 9/11 Justice

Read the accompanying article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-disingenuous-search-for-911-justice
33
Top 5 Facts of Sept 11, 2001 MIND BLOWN
10:35

Top 5 Facts of Sept 11, 2001 MIND BLOWN

Top 5 Facts of Sept 11, 2001 - 9/11 Alchemy series, watch all 3 documentaries: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Alchemy-Series:d
34
9/11 The Greatest Hits on the 9/11 truth movement
1:08:57

9/11 The Greatest Hits on the 9/11 truth movement

What if you looked at the observable evidence of what happened on September 11, 2001 and listened to the numerous survivor testimonies and you have questions that the established 9/11 truther talking heads can’t answer? Listen to the questions being asked and the answers given in relation to observable evidence shared in this demolition of the counter narrative to the official story of 2 planes and jet fuel causing all the destruction witnessed on September 11, 2001. Questions were asked from March 2023 to August 2023 – 6 months. These talking heads have been at it for 16 years, holding seminars, creating documentaries, getting airtime on mainstream and alternative media, but cannot answer these basic questions on observable evidence? All you need to do is LOOK and shut off the blah, blah, blah that you’ve been taught to regurgitate by these so called 9/11 “truthers”. What agenda do they really have? You need to realise the following regarding the cover up of September 11, 2001… Official narrative – Jet fuel. Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the Observable EVIDENCE points you to. People are lazy and if they think they’ve been handed an answer to their questions, they easily outsource their thinking and become parrots, regurgitating what their “trusted experts” taught them to think and say… Can you remember a recent event that used the same tactics? Maybe from 2020 to 2023? So, in no particular order, and some archival footage thrown in for good measure, the following talking heads are included in this controlled demolition of the official approved counter narrative to the official LIE of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001. - International Center for 9/11 Justice (formed June 2023) - Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry - AE911Truth - 9/11 Colorado for truth - Steven E. Jones - Richard Gage - David Chandler - John Cole - Wayne Coste - Gene Laratonda - Alex Jones - James Corbett I hope you have your critical thinking caps on students. Do not outsource your thinking and just blindly believe what you’ve been told to see or the statements or questions asked. Investigate and question everything. A major shout out to Math Easy Solutions (https://www.youtube.com/@mes) and realityAXIS (https://www.youtube.com/@realityAXIS) for the awesome they are doing. Find more here: Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming Odysee: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7 Substak: https://911revision.substack.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/911Revisionist Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/879905060007964 Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2588430 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDqzsgSdVAoqRkPqlTg0vsQ
35
9/11 TRUTH: What does it take for you to distrust someone?
7:02

9/11 TRUTH: What does it take for you to distrust someone?

9/11 LIAR : Richard Gage - September 5, 2023 vs 2011 What does it take for you to distrust someone? Thought experiment: This is Richard Gage, formerly with AE911Truth and also involved with the "International Center for 9/11 Justice" - Having a discussion on Sept 5, 2023; Richard as well as his lawyer DENIES in this zoom meeting that they know about a Federal Qui-Tam (whistleblower) case, filed (2007) in which the 23 NIST subcontractors were accused of science fraud. BUT, as you will see in these 3 clips, in June 2023 & in 2011 he was asked about the Federal Qui-Tam (whistleblower) case, filed (2007) and he CONFIRMS knowing about it. The question asked: Thank you for being able to ask a COVID & 9/11 related question: This is for Richard especially, but Mike’s feedback, as a lawyer, would be appreciated… With regards to court cases against NIST, I have done some reading and I have found that there were several cases filed against NIST and especially the 23 subcontractors who NIST tasked with drawing up reports that made up the 10 000-page NIST report over the last couple of years. Here we have a 10,000-page NIST investigation that investigated everything that happened after the towers suffered damaging explosions and then ended before the towers underwent their final demise. Their language was “up to the initiation of collapse.” That is science fraud. Any lawyer worth his salt should know that. To get to my question: 2 Cases were filed by TWO professors in 2007 against these 23 subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD and ONE of these cases was filed as high up as the US Supreme court in 2009. So, my question is, why have you been keeping MUM about these cases and the EVIDENCE presented, for the last 14 years and why is Richard Gage, AE911Truth AND the International Center for 911 Justice not talking about these cases, seeing it demolishes your THEORIES on explosives and Thermite? Lastly. Richard, why are you trying so hard to keep yourself and the rest of your soldiers relevant in the so called “truther” movement, seeing you’ve been showed to be a disinformation agent like Fauci and the NIH? You seem to be the COVID virus of the 9/11 truth.
3 comments
36
Do you trust the US Military Industrial Complex?
5:41

Do you trust the US Military Industrial Complex?

Do you think they'd tell you if they have star wars weapons? Ever heard of the Directed Energy Professional Society? (Google them) In this clip, Rumsfeld in 2003, then Lt Col Tom E. Bearden in 1985 and last clip is the Panama invasion in 1989, excerpt from the 1992 Academy Award winning documentary "The Panama Deception)
37
The 9/11 "truth" movement is a distraction movement!
1:25:08

The 9/11 "truth" movement is a distraction movement!

Epic stream with @MathEasySolns discussing the 9/11 "truther" talking heads distractions as well as the questions they fail dismally at answering. September 5, 2023 They actually BAN you if you're asking the right questions. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!
1 comment
38
Disproving John Cole, PE’s alternative North Tower ‘spire’ theory and the official NIST theory.
23:06

Disproving John Cole, PE’s alternative North Tower ‘spire’ theory and the official NIST theory.

During an instalment of Takeaways of the International Center for 9/11 Justice in August 2023, civil engineer Jonathan Cole presented his paper that was published during July 2023, in the Journal of 9/11 Studies. Cole tried to show with remarkable simplicity how the very existence of the North Tower “spire” — a remnant of the core structure of the North Tower 1, that remained standing after the rest of the tower came down — completely undermines the official theory of the Twin Towers’ destruction. You can watch Cole’s presentation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YLaPD7AVJE ) to learn why the North Tower “spire” is, according to the “International Center for 911 Justice”, a conversation-ending piece of evidence you’ll want to have in your arsenal if you want to take on someone who believes the official narrative of Twin Towers demise. Unfortunately for him, he falls short if he thinks he’d be able to take on a seasoned 9/11 investigator, as he will be shown in this edit of his attempt to explain away the observable evidence, as well as survivor testimonies of the North Tower in stairway B, how peer review is academia and not science… For REAL science, study this: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
1 comment
39
Wikipedia, ADL & censorship
18:01

Wikipedia, ADL & censorship

The built in AI on X (Twitter) does not allow you to upload the raw file and have it play, so you'll have to share the link to this video for people to be able watch this video.
40
911 Truth can Alex Jones be trusted
10:22

911 Truth can Alex Jones be trusted

There is a lot of censorship / disinformation in the trusted talking heads of the 9/11 "truth" movement. Read my substack: https://911revision.substack.com/ 1. The controlled demolition of the thermite theory: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite 2. Expanded: The controlled demolition of the 9/11 thermite theory - https://911revision.substack.com/p/expanded-the-controlled-demolition 3. Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3: https://911revision.substack.com/p/nuking-the-steel-of-the-twin-towers 4. Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt 5. Burying the Truth of 9/11. A critical view of AE911Truth: https://911revision.substack.com/p/burying-the-truth-of-911
41
9/11 Truth: James Fetzer, why did you do a 180? Who got to you?
11:05

9/11 Truth: James Fetzer, why did you do a 180? Who got to you?

James Fetzer, why did you do a 180? Who got to you? Why did things change when you got involved with Steven E. Jones that worked for the Dept of Energy, CIA and Los Alamos Labs? Why did you start your smear campaign after Dr Wood left your "Scholars for 911 Truth" organisation? When will you be filing your RFC (Request For Correction) to NIST, or sue NIST for science fraud like Dr Wood did in 2007 and make sure your case also goes as high as the US Supreme Court like Dr Wood did in 2009? After all, you've been bashing her for years after all you were also a cult member promoting her work - So, who made you change your mind? You seem to be so sure about your mini nuke theory, so why not put your money where your mouth is? Or are you waiting for Richard Gage, AE911T or any other poo-ba organisation to do it first, seeing none of you 9/11 "truther" talking heads have yet to do so? Whatever people should not do is read this substack: https://911revision.substack.com Or read this book: https://wheredidthetowersgo.com Nukes - The distraction behind door no 3 Official narrative – Jet fuel. Option behind door no 1 – explosives, door no 2 – thermite, door no 3 – buried or mini nukes. Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points you. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/nuking-the-steel-of-the-twin-towers
1 comment
42
Is the 9/11 "truther" movement part of the bigger cover-up?
6:49

Is the 9/11 "truther" movement part of the bigger cover-up?

Why is the ONLY independent forensic investigation done on WHAT happened to 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 CENSORED for the last 16 years?! They are SCARED of the evidence this scientist filed in 2007 AGAINST NIST's subcontractors for SCIENCE FRAUD. The 9/11 "truth" movement talking heads have been ACTIVELY steering you away from the EVIDENCE this scientists presents. Full series here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Deprogramming-series:6
43
Demolished - Richard Gage and indirectly AE911T by directed TRUTH July 2023
31:39

Demolished - Richard Gage and indirectly AE911T by directed TRUTH July 2023

This is just the highlights. – A 2h panel discussion covering FEMA on 9/11, issues with journalists, geo-engineering, the energy question and more Article by the host: https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/taking-stock-re-911-andrew-johnson-richard-gage Original source video: https://youtu.be/8WJDYpI9wmY
44
Understanding 9/11 for dummies
37:05

Understanding 9/11 for dummies

Ever since September 11, 2001 people have been outsourcing their thinking. Listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2009 Qui-Tam case was about. Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report as well as the planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex… And by the end of the video, SAIC and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers. People also seem to struggle wrapping their brains around what the buildings were built with and that there is no way in hell, aluminium can cut through steel, like a hot knife through butter... Just exactly what did those "planes" have to go through? Anyone that believes jet fuel, explosives, thermite, buried nukes, mini nukes were used, most probably also still believe in fairies, unicorns and santa claus. Open up your mind, LOOK at what is being presented to you in this video and be sure to put on your thinking cap, because a large proportion of people have fallen for the trap of the cover up, believing that the 9/11 "truther" movement are actually looking to expose the truth of WHAT happened to 8 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 - Americans, WAKE THE FUCK UP! Ask yourself the question, WHAT are all the 9/11 "truther" talking heads really doing, whilst asking for donations and talking absolute bullshit? Why, after nearly 22 years, do we still have such a strong cover-up with regards to the events of September 11, 2001? Why does the 9/11 "truther" movement and Wikipedia not want you to know about the 2009 US Supreme Court Qui-Tam cases? Top 5 Facts About September 11th, 2001 - Look into the work of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson and STOP outsourcing your thinking to the psy-op, that is the 9/11 "truther" movement.
45
How to Disappear Completely
14:58

How to Disappear Completely

A Short Film About Dustification Two 110 storey towers with a height of 1,368 feet, and a 47 storey building with a height of 589 feet, WTC 3 and 4 all turned to dust and dispersed over the whole of lower Manhattan and out to sea. These were all world class buildings, very well designed, and very well constructed. Just think of all that structural high grade concrete, and all the internal material, heavy elevator machinery, electrical gear, transformers, plumbing, water tanks, office furniture. All gone in seconds, practically atomised. And two jet airliners are supposed to have done this.? This is no terrorist attack, or demolition job, or nukes. People need to wake up, and find out WHAT really happened on 9/11. Video credit: project3ss - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuTp7HkpW7U
 1.06K  views
46
9/11 - Understanding the Evidence vs a theory
21:29

9/11 - Understanding the Evidence vs a theory

How can someone come up with WHAT happened on 9/11 if they eliminate almost all of the evidence in their investigation? See more on Odysee: @911revisited:7
47
9/11 MANIACS
11:38

9/11 MANIACS

Maniacs are responsible for 9/11 Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7
48
9/11 The NIST Report's Science Fraud
5:24

9/11 The NIST Report's Science Fraud

Excerpt from the “9/11 Observable Evidence” series, Part 1 Watch it here: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/911-Observable-Evidence---1-of-4:7
49
9/11 - Gravity collapse? Thermite? Explosives? Nukes?
21:29

9/11 - Gravity collapse? Thermite? Explosives? Nukes?

The problem is not a shortage of evidence, the problem is nobody wants to look at the evidence and think for themselves, because everyone wants to be told what to think by "experts"... Only problem is, these so called "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the EVIDENCE.
50
Where are the Towers?
5:00

Where are the Towers?

An excerpt of Ace Baker's documentary "9/11 The great American PSY-OPERA" with one of the best visualisations to bring home the question: Where did the towers go? To fully understand how much steel there was used in the construction of the towers, you need to study this great article - https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2007/11/03/a-lengthy-discussion-of-wtc-steel/ Controlled demolition / thermite / buried nukes / mini nukes, just don’t explain WHAT happened to all 7 x WTC buildings… And one smoking gun is the 16 survivors in stairway B of tower 1. Some more vid’s to watch in order to understand what the survivors of Tower 1 testified to: https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7/9-11-Survivors:e Join the discussions on our other platforms; https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming https://twitter.com/911Revisionist https://911revision.substack.com https://www.facebook.com/groups/879905060007964
2 comments

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

Save
1 year ago
841
911 truth

A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

Please read this article before watching the presentation I did on 10.02.2024. - https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth

Get the popcorn - It was 4 hours long, refuting the following 10 points put forth against DEW being the mechanism of destruction on September 11, 2001.

I dissect all 10 points he raises to try and refute DEW, which you can read about in this book. https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Let’s go!

This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. Timestamp 5 min 30

Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down…

1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints.
Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57:30)

2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns.
Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57:30 to 1h12:33)

3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges.
Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30)

4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW.
Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30)

5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32)

6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires.
Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23)

7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW.
Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08)

8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures.
Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56)

9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents.
Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15)

10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis.
Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well)

Then for some closing thoughts, that are thought provoking…
Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15

Loading 6 comments...