Infestation of Vultures Excluded
Reasonable Basis for Denying Coverage Defeats Bad Faith Claim
Post 4720
Mitchellville Plaza Bar LP ("Mitchellville") appealed the district court's granting summary judgment to Hanover American Insurance Company on Mitchellville's breach of contract and bad faith claims arising from an insurance dispute over the infestation of its property by vultures. Mitchellville's complaint alleged that Hanover wrongfully denied coverage under its insurance policy for commercial property damage caused by turkey vultures to the roof of one of Mitchellville's properties. Hanover denied coverage under an exclusion for damage caused by an "infestation" of birds.
In Mitchellville Plaza Bar LP v. The Hanover American Insurance Company, No. 22-2089, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit (January 19, 2024) the Fourth Circuit resolved the policy interpretation.
FACTS
Mitchellville concedes that the only disputed issue in its breach of contract claim is whether the "infestation" policy exception applies to bar its claim. A contract is not rendered ambiguous by the mere fact that the parties do not agree upon the proper construction.
ANALYSIS
Mitchellville argued the exclusion was ambiguous. The court must consider a written contract and can not find it is ambiguous only when a policy provision is reasonably susceptible of more than one meaning. The Fourth Circuit noted that the district court did not err in determining that the vulture presence on Mitchellville's property constituted an "infestation" under a plain and ordinary understanding of this term.
Indeed, as the district court found, the various definitions of the term "infestation" commonly characterize an infestation as the persistent, invasive presence of unwanted creatures. The evidence of the vulture activity at the property, including the eyewitness testimony detailing the substantial bird activity at the property over the course of many months, meets this definition. Accordingly, the district court properly granted summary judgment to Hanover on Mitchellville's breach of contract claim.
Bad Faith
While an insurer's motive of self-interest or ill-will is potentially probative it is not a mandatory prerequisite to bad faith recovery. Proof of the insurer's knowledge or reckless disregard for its lack of reasonable basis in denying the claim is sufficient.
Hanover based its denial of policy benefits on several reports that, taken together, gave Hanover a reasonable basis for denying coverage. The reports indicated that substantial, persistent, and troublesome bird activity had caused the relevant damage to the roof of the property. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit concluded that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment to Hanover on this claim and affirmed the judgment of the district court.
ZALMA OPINION
When a flock of vultures lands on a roof over a period of months and damages or destroys the roof, that is an infestation of birds and was excluded by clear and unambiguous language of the policy. Courts are required to apply the facts and the law to the clear and unambiguous language of the policy. No insurance policy covers every possible cause of loss. This policy told the insured when it acquired the policy that it would not cover losses caused by an infestation of birds.
(c) 2024 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/publish/post/107007808
Go to Newsbreak.com https://www.newsbreak.com/@c/1653419?s=01
Go to X @bzalma; Go to the podcast Zalma On Insurance at https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/barry-zalma/support; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/c/c-262921; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – http://zalma.com/blog/insurance-claims-library.
-
8:36
Barry Zalma, Inc. on Insurance Law
3 months agoZalma's Insurance Fraud Letter - January 15, 2024
182 -
LIVE
Trumpet Daily
51 minutes agoTrumpet Daily | May 9, 2024
1,423 watching -
LIVE
Benny Johnson
1 hour agoTrump Trial 'Star Witness' Referred to DOJ for PRISON! Stormy Daniels TIRE FIRE Testimony BLOWS UP🔥
9,828 watching -
DVR
Geeks + Gamers
2 hours agoFans Are DONE With Woke Disney, Star Wars Gets DESTROYED For Pushing Agenda In New Show | G+G Daily
6671 -
2:09:26
The Kirk Minihane Show
4 hours agoKMS Live - May 9, 2024
19.4K -
2:05:52
Matt Kohrs
12 hours agoTrump Backs Crypto, Stocks on Edge & Live Trading || The MK Show
17.7K -
2:28:59
Due Dissidence
13 hours agoIsraeli Spokesman CRUMBLES on Piers Morgan, Student Protester SCHOOLS Media, Seinfeld's Movie TANKS
17K43 -
48:11
Rethinking the Dollar
2 hours agoDigital Revolution: A Bank Stops Cash Services (People Forced To Rethink Banking)
8.49K1 -
1:37:53
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
7 hours agoThe Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #911
35.8K22 -
2:58:21
Wendy Bell Radio
7 hours agoThe Democrat Dreamscape
49K121