YYV1C8 God Damn Religion Snake in the Desert…Slithering Out of the Garden Petulant Prophet

A Shabat Study of Yahowah's Torah. Join a group of Yah's family as we delve into the Towrah of God. We will expose religious corruption while more importantly espousing Yah's Torah truth. Hosted by the author of Yada Yahowah, An Introduction to God, Observations, Coming Home, Questioning Paul, Prophet of Doom, and Tea with Terrorists.

https://yadayah.com/
http://yahowahberyth.com/
https://yadayah.com/Books/God-Damn-Religion/Volume-1/Chapter08.html?nonav
https://www.blessyah.com/
http://forum.yadayah.com/

0:00:08 Petulant Prophet
0:19:17 God is reminding us that He dislikes religious and political leaders so much that He won’t tolerate them in His presence, near His people, or in His land.
0:43:11 Yahowah’s test is a relatively simple one. It contains six elements (with six being the number of man):
1) Is the person a naby’: someone who claims to speak on behalf of God? This is a screening condition. If a person admits that they are speaking for themselves, then they would be excluded from this analysis. Muhammad qualifies and is culpable.
2) Is the person zyd: someone who oversteps their bounds, acting presumptuously with an inflated sense of self-worth, demonstrating self-reliance while taking liberties, someone who arrogantly pretends to know, who insults others and is disrespectful, displaying pride in the pursuit of personal recognition and acclaim while demeaning competitors, someone who rebels against the legitimate authority and is prone to anger, someone who seethes with frustration and is often furious, overbearing, rude, or conceited? This is a broad net, one which catches almost every imposter – but none 396were as egregious in this regard as was Islam’s non-prophet.
3) Does the person la dabar dabar ba ‘any shem: openly and publicly preach to others, communicating their message in the name or designation of God? As was the case with the first codicil, this is also a screening test. If the individual in question has an insignificantly small audience, if their preaching is done in private, if their influence is limited in time and place, then there would be no reason to assess their credentials. And in this case, Muhammad remains indictable.
4) Is the person’s message ‘lo tsawah: inconsistent with what God has instructed, taught, and directed in His Towrah? Does the message conflict with what God appointed and decreed? Does it vary from His prior testimony? This is where Muhammad is convicted and will be damned. He can’t even keep his own stories straight, much less be consistent with God.
5) Does the person dabar ba shem ‘acher ‘elohym: speak in the name of gods other than Yahowah? Replacing Yahowah’s name with Allah’s convicts Muhammad.
6) Does the person hayah: accurately convey what has happened in the past, and do their predictions of the future bow’: materialize and come to exist as they have stated them? This is a test only a real prophet can pass. And the last of them spoke 2,500 years ago. Muhammad was a complete failure in this regard.