British medicines agency (86% industry funded) threatened press: Stop reporting on vaxx risks!

When The Telegraph referred to a study from Norway on the blood clots caused by the AstraZeneca jab, the newspaper got a threatening phone call from a senior MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) official saying that they had better soften their reporting or they would be banned from future...Show more

A well-known Cambridge academic also got in touch to complain about the “disgraceful fear-mongering headline” on the story, claiming that it would discourage ‘vaccine’ uptake and cost lives. This would be true IF the jabs were strictly necessary, safe and effective. In reality, the jabs are unnecessary, highly toxic and counter-effective. Therefore, discouraging ‘vaccine’ uptake doesn’t COST lives but SAVES lives.

Regardless of whether it costs or saves lives, the public have a right to know about all details (fully informed consent), so the media should report them. Conversely, hiding the fact and misleading the public is illegal.

LINKS

In the end, the AstraZeneca vaccine just wasn’t as good as its rivals | The Telegraph
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/11/08/how-astrazeneca-vaccine-was-shelved/

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? | The British Medical Journal
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538.full

Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/medicines-and-healthcare-products-regulatory-agency

SOURCE

Segment from: https://rumble.com/v43mrgk