Premium Only Content

THIS Happens If You UNINTENTIONALLY PEW-PEW a BYSTANDER!
A question that comes up with some regularity is what are the legal consequences if a round fired in self-defense unintentionally kills an innocent bystander.
Is the defender guilty of murder of that bystander? Of manslaughter? Is there any legal liability at all? And, whatever the answer--why? What's the underlying legal doctrine?
I've addressed this question many times, but last week a Law of Self Defense Member asked during Friday's live stream about a case out of the Kansas Supreme Court that he believed suggests my answer is wrong--or, at least, is contradicted by that particular case.
Is it possible? Did Attorney Andrew F. Branca make a mistake about use-of-force law?
It's certainly POSSIBLE--like all of you, I'm merely human. And I always appreciate the possibility being brought to my attention, as that ensures I keep my use-of-force law expertise as sharp as possible.
In this particular case, however, the Kansas case cited is exactly consistent with my usual explanation of how the law treats bystander killings--and in today's show I'll share that case with you and explain why I'm still right. :-)
Join LIVE at Noon ET to discuss!
THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust
You have a GUN so you're hard to KILL--know the LAW so you're hard to CONVICT.
https://lawofselfdefense.com/
Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
2:19:14
The Attorney Andrew Branca Show
7 days agoYUGE WIN! Court AFFIRMS Trump's POWER to END Dem THEFT!
1.89K -
2:06:30
Inverted World Live
7 hours agoDon't Approach the Zombie Rabbits | Ep. 95
41.4K18 -
Drew Hernandez
3 hours agoISRAEL PLANNING POSSIBLE DRAFT IN USA & TRUMP'S VIEW ON ETERNAL LIFE ANALYZED PT 2
32.4K16 -
3:08:07
TimcastIRL
6 hours agoTexas Republicans Win, House Passes Redistricting Map, GOP Looks To Gain 5 Seats | Timcast IRL
177K71 -
1:30:34
FreshandFit
7 hours agoHow To Stay Focused While Pursuing Women...The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly
55.9K34 -
1:47:05
Drew Hernandez
11 hours agoISRAEL PLANNING POSSIBLE DRAFT IN USA & TRUMP'S VIEW ON ETERNAL LIFE ANALYZED PT 1
39.2K58 -
29:55
Afshin Rattansi's Going Underground
3 days agoProf. Omer Bartov: The REAL REASON the US, UK, and EU Have Not Recognised Israel’s Genocide in Gaza
37.7K28 -
6:28:34
SpartakusLIVE
8 hours agoWednesday WZ with the Challenge MASTER || Duos w/ GloryJean
52.3K1 -
2:36:12
Barry Cunningham
8 hours agoREACTING TO STEPHEN MILLER | KASH PATEL | TULSI GABBARD INTERVIEWS AND MORE NEWS!
84.6K70 -
3:51:51
Alex Zedra
5 hours agoLIVE! Solo Scary Game night
36.2K1