Premium Only Content

THIS Happens If You UNINTENTIONALLY PEW-PEW a BYSTANDER!
A question that comes up with some regularity is what are the legal consequences if a round fired in self-defense unintentionally kills an innocent bystander.
Is the defender guilty of murder of that bystander? Of manslaughter? Is there any legal liability at all? And, whatever the answer--why? What's the underlying legal doctrine?
I've addressed this question many times, but last week a Law of Self Defense Member asked during Friday's live stream about a case out of the Kansas Supreme Court that he believed suggests my answer is wrong--or, at least, is contradicted by that particular case.
Is it possible? Did Attorney Andrew F. Branca make a mistake about use-of-force law?
It's certainly POSSIBLE--like all of you, I'm merely human. And I always appreciate the possibility being brought to my attention, as that ensures I keep my use-of-force law expertise as sharp as possible.
In this particular case, however, the Kansas case cited is exactly consistent with my usual explanation of how the law treats bystander killings--and in today's show I'll share that case with you and explain why I'm still right. :-)
Join LIVE at Noon ET to discuss!
THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust
You have a GUN so you're hard to KILL--know the LAW so you're hard to CONVICT.
https://lawofselfdefense.com/
Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
2:37:24
The Attorney Andrew Branca Show
9 days agoTRUMP SCOTUS RECORD NOW 17-0! Justice Ketanji Loses AGAIN!
1.95K3 -
4:47:50
The Why Files
2 days agoCOMPILATION: UFOs and Aliens Vol.2 | They are NOT our friends
31.3K36 -
5:30:10
SpartakusLIVE
8 hours ago#1 Verdansk Sniper gets HACCUSATIONS because of INSANE Headshots
43K4 -
46:18
SB Mowing
2 days agoShe was LOSING HOPE but this SURPRISE CHANGED EVERYTHING
23.1K40 -
LIVE
ItsLancOfficial
7 hours agoWE LIVE 🔴WE LIVE 🔴 SUNDAY SUNDAYS!!!!!!! TARKOV
515 watching -
4:09:32
EricJohnPizzaArtist
6 days agoAwesome Sauce PIZZA ART LIVE Ep. #59: Are You Ready for some FOOTBALL with GameOn!
21.2K7 -
1:21:43
Jake Shields' Fight Back Podcast
13 hours agoJake Shields and Paul Miller!
56.2K100 -
1:20:41
TRAGIKxGHOST
4 hours agoTrying to get SCARED tonight! | Are You SCARED!? | Screams Beyond Midnight | Grab a Snack
16.5K2 -
5:21:24
StuffCentral
6 hours agoI'm baaack (no you can't play with me.. unless you a healer)
18.8K4 -
2:25:11
TheSaltyCracker
7 hours agoTrump Is Not Dead ReEEeStream 8-31-25
89.7K124