Statistician William Briggs on his analysis of my New Zealand analysis
Some people believe Briggs is disputing my analysis. Here are the facts right from the source: HE NEVER LOOKED AT MY ANALYSIS.
He simply wanted to do it his own way and failed to find a signal using HIS methods. That does not mean there isn't a signal. It just means that the way he approached it, he didn't find a significant signal. More on that later.
But the key point is he is not claiming that my method is flawed or wrong, only that it smooths over the data because the buckets are 1 week long. Fine. But even with the "smoothing" the signal is HUGE.
Anyone saying Briggs is saying my analysis is flawed is mistaken. He's only saying that HIS method didn't find a big signal and I'll explain why that is shortly (because he didn't look the at it the right way... can you see his big mistake?).
-
2:11:01
Jewels Jones Live ®
1 day ago“NO MONEY FOR AMERICANS” | A Political Rendezvous - Ep. 94
117K41 -
5:17:15
Drew Hernandez
1 day agoTRUMP'S RETURN TO BUTLER PA RALLY
132K101 -
1:20:55
-
1:00
steveinman
1 day agoDog sweeps the leg of a tortoise
113K35 -
36:51
Michael Franzese
1 day agoMy time in prison with Menendez Brothers | Monsters Netflix Series Review
192K47 -
1:51:03
Game On!
1 day ago $23.03 earnedCollege Football Saturday! Week 6 Preview and Predictions!
146K21 -
1:09:56
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
1 day ago"The Truth About Presidential Power, Weak Checks & Balances, & Civic Responsibility"
98.7K24 -
17:28
Winston Marshall
3 days agoThe VP Debate REVEALED More Than You Know...
180K181 -
1:20:16
Bright Insight
1 day agoFriday Night LIVESTREAM
111K63 -
20:54
Stephen Gardner
1 day ago🔴JUST IN: Fox News Jesse Waters SHARES BAD NEWS from Trump’s Lawyer!
111K244