Civilian COOP vs Military COOP

The assertion that the Commander-in-Chief role is distinct from the President's responsibilities is a fundamental misunderstanding of constitutional principles. This isn't merely a matter of opinion; it's about the core tenets of our Constitution, which, if misinterpreted, could have significant governmental repercussions. There is no legal basis for such a separation, as the Constitution clearly defines these roles.

My stance against the Devolution theory and Derrick Johnson's interpretations has been challenging within certain circles, particularly among some supporters of the Make America Great Again movement. It's one thing to have political disagreements or differing views on military operations, but it's entirely another to subscribe to theories not grounded in our laws and Constitution. Such beliefs, which often involve selectively interpreting laws and constitutional provisions, can be dangerously misleading.

Distinct Roles of DHS and DoD

DHS, including FEMA, concentrates on domestic security, border protection, immigration, and disaster response. In contrast, DoD handles military forces and national defense. Their roles remain separate, with collaboration during national emergencies when necessary.

The United States' legal framework for national continuity is comprehensive and firmly grounded in constitutional principles. It safeguards civilian authority and prevents military overreach during emergencies. Understanding the distinctions between FEMA and DoD roles is essential in debunking misconceptions, ensuring a harmonized approach to crisis management, and upholding the nation's commitment to civilian governance.