No Revolution Needed: Government for the people, by the people has a secret.

THIS IS HISTORIC: NO GOVERNMENT HAS EVER WENT THROUGH WHAT WE GO THROUGH NOW. The heads of FBI/CIA/NSA/NSA are corrupt yet there's good guys inside not taking orders from the heads, but instead influencers and thinking for themselves... Spy vs spy! Come learn a new form of government the world's never seen before as it unfolds like of this past week!Show more

Come watch me be censored LOL

Prayer:

Dear Jesus,

Thank you for guiding me to write this book.
I want to open people's eyes so they no longer see in darkness.
I want to bring a light to them.
I want people to eat good food and not just poop fed to them.
I want to feed them scripture instead of propaganda.

I am going to start the book talking about myself and leadership.
This is to give people the idea that I'm trying to talk myself up.
And maybe I will some.

But I am going to close all about you. You are the Hero of the Mushroom Kingdom.
In the darkness, we have seen a bright light. May you lead us eternally.
May I help more people follow you Jesus.

Amen,
James

Praise Jesus, Jehovah, and the Holy Spirit.

Chapter I: They want you to argue politically
(Main Stream Media)

Ever talk politics with someone? It quickly descends into emotions and people get upset and argue. Nothing is gained and people get upset at friends. Do you know this is by design? If the regular folk are out arguing, the regular folk are never going to agree on good political ideas. No grass roots ideas will rise up so that the politicians will have to what is right. Instead, since we are all divided, the bribed politicians in power will do anything they want. And they want to do what the people who bribed them wants and then tell us why it is good for us. They care about their own money and power over what is good for the people. They want to keep us in the dark and feed us crap.

"If you ever find yourself arguing with friends or people on the internet, it can put you in a long term bad mood. To combat being in this bad mood, go order out some food like pizza and spend some quality time with loved ones: friends and family. That argument funk feeling falls off."

Who is getting us to argue though? Well mostly the news pushes argument scripts. Ever think the news is very boring because it keeps saying the same thing? That is because it doesn't want to admit that topics are very complex. They want the simple minded to think that political topics are very simple. They want to push that the other party is the reason we can't get things done. They want you to argue.

"Many smart people sometimes watch the news, but you cannot get smart by watching the news."

The news wants to paint the topics as simple and repetitive because they want to drill it in your mind the way to argue. I avoid watching the news often because I see through this propaganda. I don't want to have a place in my mind to let them influence me and argue with my friends. Actually I take that back. I like to watch the news to see what they're pushing.

"In Russia, people read the single party state run Pravda newspaper to learn what the state is trying to push"

In the United States it is more tricky to keep the populace under control. Instead of one party, they have two parties. It turns out that what they push is less important than how they push it. It doesn't matter what either party stands for, so long as they're polar opposites and arguing. As long as you have a populace arguing, grass roots ideas do not form. The last thing politicians want is the American people asking en mass for policy change that is against what their lobbyists are bribing them for. Grass roots politics rising up and getting mass acceptance is what they're afraid of. This is why they want us arguing.

"The politicians at the highest level are bribed by lobbyists. They take legalized bribe money for campaigns. Then they do what they're lobbyists want them to do and tell the American people that it is best for us. The politicians aren't always telling us the truth. ”

The United States has a law against buying a citizen's vote. The fear is that if a politician wants to get elected locally, they could go around house to house and give each person a dollar to vote for them. Then citizens not caring who gets elected would vote for the guy,”Hey, dude gave me a dollar, lets make him in charge of us!” Everyone looks at this law and goes,”That's a great law. Let us not have our democracy subverted by money.” That is nothing compared to the rife corruption going on now! We have entities and organizations buying politicians out by bribes. Instead of politicians being for the people, random wealthy organizations are using politicians in their pockets to write legislation.

“Way back in Boy Scouts we were talking about our United States democracy. I heard that corporations can legally bribe people running for Congress and I felt very bad to my stomach. I asked my Scout Leaders,'If it is like this, isn't money going to corrupt our government eventually?' They reassured me that politicians are still going to do things that are best for the people. I don't think this is true now, but back then, I am glad they didn't leave me in a bad state to be concerned for our country being corrupted”

“I don't want you to have a bad mind state reading this either. This is the book that needs to be wrote so that we can be smart enough to fix things. Focus on being positive. Focus on helping others be positive. Avoid fierce arguments. And be an agent for positive change.”

What we have going on now is that the hyper wealthy are acting like proxy rulers. They bribe politicians in what is called campaign contributions. Campaign contributions are totally legal. Their campaign spends this money to do research into what the people want to hear. Then they do television and radio ads telling the people that the politician will do everything they want. The more money the politician takes in as campaign contribution bribes, the more likely he'll be elected.

Every different organization who wants to give the politician money has different morals. They want to change society this way and that. One might want to sell more of their own product as corporations do. Another might be a company who wants their own company to make more money so they want their competition regulated. Another might event want to usher in destructive policies or over regulation to weaken our economy for the bribes can even come from a foreign country. These lobbyist organizations could literally want any political change, and they're just trying to get their way by money. Once they bribe a politician who gets elected, they then have em in their pocket so to speak. A lobbyist then tells this politician how to legislate, even sometimes writing entire bills themselves and putting them on the bribed congressman or congresswoman's desk.

Since taking bribes buys television campaign ad time, people who take less bribes end up getting less tv, radio and Internet ads. People with less exposure of ads telling everyone that they're great get elected less. This means people with a strong moral foundation who don't want to take any bribes from lobbyists end up don't get elected. Those who refuse some bribes get elected less often. People who take no bribes don't stand much of a chance. This is the state of US elections today. We are in a place where our system encourages the biggest bribe taking sell outs to be our nation's leaders.

“There really is no easy solution to disconnect campaign contribution bribery from our system. If you outlawed campaign contributions, the lobbyists would still get Congressmen and Congresswomen in their pockets. Instead of donating to a campaign, they'd run the ads themselves directly. You'd lose the ability to track their donors for an off chance you can prosecute one for secret dealings. Right now, at least you can sometimes trace their donors to know who's pockets they are in. ”

There are people in the age of the Internet who look up every person they vote for. They look at their legislation voting record. They look at if they voted for things they like. They see the politician's history and make an informed vote. If enough people did this hard work, things could change for the better. The thing is that these people are vastly outnumbered by people who watch a television political ad and fall for it. Of course they TV political ad is going to tell you what you want to hear, they've done research into the demographics of the area. They're going to tell you what you want to hear on television advertisements. They're going to slander their opponents. This is because they know they can spend money this way to get your vote. They're going to do what you want to hear on the TV ad, then when in office, they'll do whatever they please.

“They can't buy your vote with money or product, but they can tell you a nice lie to make you feel good to get your vote. Then when they're in office, they'll do whatever they want to and tell you it is good for you... whether it is or not.”

Chapter 2: They want you to argue politically
(Social Media)

So we know the play book of the people who think they are in charge. They run news propaganda, they influence television and movies as propaganda. They've always done this, but it has increased in intensity. When social media became big though, the think tanks became concerned. “What if people started discussing among themselves better ways to do things than we're doing them? We could lose our ability to get our way with bribed politicians. We need a plan.”

Social media in its early days were websites and blogging platforms to spread cool stuff among your friends. You used them to keep in touch with peers and opportunities in your field. When Facebook and Twitter came around, many bloggers went,”Oh this appears to be a superior blogging platform.” Then the big public forum guys of Facebook and Twitter became behemoths because people thought they were superior. It is only now as things keep coming out of how they've been corrupted politically that many original adopters are leaving them.

What was the plan with social media? How did the corrupt bribe giving hyper wealthy control the population? No longer could they feed talking point scripts by the news to get people arguing. Everyone was their own voice, it would seem like things would get out of control. How could you get them arguing on this technology if you can't feed them a steady stream of crap? It turns out the solution isn't as tough as it sounds. You use technology and hire an army of to argue with others.

“It is known with the traditional mainstream media tactic of getting people to argue for you, it produces a chain reaction of people arguing. In Social Media, if you have hundreds of people arguing and pushing propaganda, you effectively get thousands or millions of people arguing as a reverberation effect.”

Do you know people get paid to protest? There are buses that show up around where I live and offer fifty or a hundred bucks a head to show up for random protests. It isn't that important what they're protesting, but that it gets people upset and arguing. When people are upset and arguing, grassroots cannot lift up and you cannot get honest non bribe taking individuals elected.

“There is a story called 'A Boy Who Cried Wolf'. It goes like this: Once a boy was called to watch the sheep while the men took a break to rest. They told the boy to yell that a wolf came if one came so the men could deal with it. The boy thought it'd be funny if he shouted,'Wolf! Wolf!” So he did. The men came and finding no wolf, they left to get back to rest. The boy did it again, and the men again got upset and left back to rest. Finally a wolf did come, and the boy cried wolf with all he had, but the men did not come because they were desensitized of all the false alarms. The wolf killed the sheep and the kid.”

“In the same way as that story goes, the paid protesters en mass across the country gets us desensitized to actual non funded protests. You see a few protests on the news every week. Everyone is protesting nonsense stuff. So when an actual protest happens that everyone should care about and support shows, it gets ignored. This is by design.”

“Do not accept money to go protest a cause you have no concern about. To protest things you don't care about for money is to be a protest-tute.”

Do you know people get paid to argue on the Internet? This is the thing they don't want you to know is even happening. Here is how it works: Imagine a call center with dozens of people. They have an algorithm that searches for politically charged words. These call center people find people who use those words say on Facebook or Twitter automatically because of their software. Then they simply write a pithy unthinking insult, and move to the next comment their software finds by politically charged words. They have bots to find them where to argue, but actual people tend to write comments, but sometimes bots even just drop the pithy insults themselves.

People who post political ideas they care about tend to take it to their heart. People want to change the system for the better. So when they get a pithy unthinking insult, they may take offense easy. They may insult back, in which case they are playing into the hands of those who want them to argue.

They may think less of their fellow human being. Argue bots are like bullies. People who get bullied a lot tend to not like the general population of humanity. There are many people who wanted to help society, but after mass bullying, they become selfish and inwardly seeking. They go,”Why should I help anyone but myself when there are so many jerks?” The evil of bullying induces the evil of selfishness. So people bright eye and bush tailed who talk great grassroots politics always met with gruff, pithy, insulting political bots might go,”Hey, why should I even help humanity? Politics isn't worth it.” Again, here the political bots win.

The only winning strategy is to actually call them out as political bots. Then you mute them. I'm writing this book in large part to educate people on these bad guys. They're out to get you arguing in a large scale. Even if you check out of politics, at least don't fall into the trap of arguing. If someone doesn't like your ideas, don't take it personal, you might have encountered real corruption immediately that is your opposition. Arguing is not the answer though it would seem that clarifying your position would help everyone. These argue bots just slander, hate, and want you to join them by slandering them back and hating them back. Don't fall into that trap, just know they exist. Call them an political argue bot, mute them and move on. Raise awareness that political bots are a thing. This is one purpose of this book. I want to educate people.

“If you argue with a fool, sometimes onlookers can't tell which one is the fool.”