Robert Kennedy Jr Responds to a C-Span Caller Who Labels Him a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’

Robert Kennedy Jr Responds to a C-Span Caller Who Labels Him a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’

CALLER: “Your conspiracy theories – they literally scare us... 5G is mass surveillance... I’m so confused.”

KENNEDY: “You say that 5G is not used for surveillance. Is there really any American left who believes that the government is not spying on the American people? Edward Snowden demonstrated this. I don’t think you’ll find a single member of Congress who, if you ask them, ‘Does the government spy on Americans?’ [who] will tell you no. So, I don’t understand how that’s a conspiracy theory,” said RFK Jr.

Kennedy also addressed the caller’s concerns about chemicals in water affecting human health. He clarified that he never claimed atrazine causes transgenderism but pointed out that the chemical is an endocrine disruptor.

He cited studies where male frogs exposed to atrazine were sterilized, and some even changed sex. Kennedy argued that these endocrine disruptors could be affecting human health in ways we don’t yet fully understand.

“Anybody can look up these studies that show atrazine… In fact, in one of the studies, they took 27 male frogs and exposed them to atrazine. 90% of them were sterilized, and 10% of the frogs became female and were able to produce fertile eggs. So, it has that capacity. It’s an endocrine disruptor…”

Kennedy’s response highlights a growing divide not just in American politics but also in the realm of public discourse. Labels like “conspiracy theorist” are often used to dismiss or delegitimize individuals who challenge mainstream narratives. The term is used as a rhetorical weapon to silence dissenting voices.

However, as Kennedy pointed out, questioning the status quo is not the same as denying reality. In an era where trust in institutions is waning, and the public is increasingly skeptical of mainstream narratives, the need for open dialogue and rigorous scientific inquiry is more critical than ever. Kennedy’s call for a closer look at the potential health impacts of modern technologies and chemicals is not a call for alarmism but a call for caution and due diligence.