Which King James Bible Version would I recommend?

Blog and associated study links for this video

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2023/10/which-king-bible-version-would-i.html

Background:

Why the King James matters and why so many attack it.

The Foundation is The WORD OF GOD

The Final Authority of the King James Bible

Modern Bible translations are satanic:

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2018/10/modern-bible-translations-are-satanic.html

The History of the King James Bible. Why it is the FINAL AUTHORITY of God's Word:

The True History of the King James Bible - all modern Bible Translations are Satanic (thethirdheaventraveler.com)

Why the King James Bible uses ONLY BEGOTTEN and NOT only Son.

Ridiculous KJV Bible Corrections - John 3:16, Only Begotten (av1611.com)

Quote:

"John 3:16 is quoted more than any other verse in the Bible, at least by Christians and other church-goers. There may be no verse that is more frequently perverted than this one, but most people still know the full verse as presented by the KJV. Why then, is it so hard to find the word 'begotten' in other versions? The word in question is 'monogenes'. This is a compound of two words monos and genes, the latter being drawn from the verb genao, which means to beget or cause to be produced. Monos means only or single, as is clear by its many appearances in English, such as monotony, monopoly, monotone, etc. Genao has come into the English language as well in words like generation, genesis, genes, generate, and so forth. The two words together mean only-begotten! "

Dr. John Hinton

The spirit of TRUTH and the spirit of ERROR. Doctrine Matters (thethirdheaventraveler.com)

Doctrine is: Learning The Teaching of the Word of God (thethirdheaventraveler.com)

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2021/10/jesus-hates-nicolaitans.html

https://www.thethirdheaventraveler.com/2022/04/understand-bible-from-workman-approved.html

Doctrine of Balaam:

The doctrine of Balaam is a teaching that encourages God’s people to compromise their standards and commit idolatry and fornication123. It originates from the counsel that Balaam gave to King Balak, who wanted to destroy Israel23. Balaam could not curse Israel, but he advised Balak to seduce them with pagan women and practices23. This doctrine was later adopted by some false teachers and leaders in the church, who led their followers astray13.

A Powerful Truth: Understanding Who are the Nicolaitans of today (thethirdheaventraveler.com)

The Church of Philadelphia VS The Church of Laodicea (thethirdheaventraveler.com)

Behold The Lamb of God. Do you know Him? (thethirdheaventraveler.com)
The King James detractors always repeat worn out reasons the King James Bible is not accurate, or the FINAL AUTHORITY of God's word and they use the Hate and Division word saying that we KING JAMES ONLY are a cult and cause division and strife in the church.

YES, WE DO BECAUSE JESUS DID NOT COME TO BRING PEACE BUT A SWORD AND THE WORD OF GOD IS SHARPER THAN ANY 2-EDGED SWORD THAT PIERCES AND DIVIDES ASUNDER SOUL FROM SPIRIT.

Matthew 10:34
“Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”

King James Version (KJV)

Hebrews 4:12 KJB

12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

WE DO NOT COMPROMISE WITH SIN BUT EXPOSE IT.

Ephesians 5:11
“And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.”

King James Version (KJV)

King James Bibles I use and recommend:

Note: As long as you find a KING JAMES BIBLE 1769 - today called the Standard Translation - it really comes down to personal preferences.

Note: I would not recommend the 1900 Revisions. See further in this study. Thanks to my amazing Brother in Christ Cameron Moshfegh from Switzerland.

Here's a KING JAMES BIBLE site I've used

KJV Bible Store | Buy Bibles Online | KJV Bible Bookstore (thekjvstore.com)

I personally use and love the Thomas Nelson King James Bible Red Letter Edition in my study. This is my main reference source in my study and teaching.

I also have a KJV Study Bible printed in 2011 Barbour Publishing, based on the 1769 that I use from time to time to check references and to find the context for historical background.

Note: Be careful with any commentary in the King James Study bibles. Just as in the misuse of the Strongs Concordance, it is very easy to get off track as I've found commentary that is not correct.

I have the 1611 with the ASV Authorized Version whenever contemplating the historical reference to a word for example the Middle English to Early Modern English use of suffixes "eth," "est" etc. And by the way, the suffixes really matter as they express the superlative among other things. The most compelling was in my study of John 21, "Peter do you love me?"

But for the most part, because of the old printing press issues and significant spelling, grammar, syntax, and vowel changes to name a few in the English language from 1611 to 1769, we King James Bible users will use the 1769 version.

Note: As part of this study, I'm compelled (personally - not telling anyone they should) purchase the

1769 Oxford “Standard” Revision of the 1611 KJV Bible | GreatSite.com

Here is an example of the actual 1611 to the

1611 KJV Bible
✟
“These things haue I written vnto you that beleeue on the Name of the Sonne of God, that ye may know, that ye haue eternall life, and that yee may beleeue on the Name of the Sonne of God.”

1769 Reference:

1 John 5:13 (KJV)

“These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.”
1 John 5:13 (KJV)

UNDERSTANDING THE Difference between EARLY Modern English and Modern English; i.e, 1611 English compared to 1769 English.

See below in this study regarding the REPROBATES who try to tell you the King James Bible is loaded with thousands upon thousands of errors. I respond in red letters to the most egregious and provide links of solid King James Apologists that easily refute these ridiculous claims.