Premium Only Content

Publishers: is this why you can't sell subscriptions?
To sell subscriptions, think about value, not audiences
Bo Sacks sent an email about publishing execs telling advertisers about their ability to grow and engage audiences. That’s getting harder because platforms like Facebook are not promoting publisher content like they used to.
Which gives me a good opportunity to remind everybody not to rely on platforms.
Dominic Carter from The Sun says their audience growth has come from “giving the people what they want,” including coverage of TV celebrities.
At that point I stopped and wondered if this is precisely why media companies are having such trouble selling subscriptions.
The top of the funnel – traffic to the site – is “what people want.” Titillating stuff, I guess. Maybe it’s about who wore what on the red carpet.
That sort of thing attracts eyeballs, and if you do it right you can attract a particular audience, but … what do you have when you’ve done that? Do you have people who are interested in buying something?
Magazine sites struggle to get people to spend $10 on an annual subscription. Meanwhile, people are spending $11 a month on Spotify, and $15 a month on Netflix.
If you can’t sell your product, here are two of the many questions you might ask.
Am I offering something of value?
Am I offering it to the right people?
Is it possible – I’m asking, sincerely – that the “build an audience for advertisers” mindset – and the techniques that come along with it – is a poor match for the “find people who might buy” mindset?
How are you qualifying your prospects?
From an ad perspective, you’re looking for a certain demographic with “an interest” in some subject. But I can have a vague, passing interest in all kinds of subjects where I have no interest at all in spending any money. There’s nothing “need to have” there. It’s just candy. A distraction.
Marketers often talk about the difference between nice to have and need to have. An ad-driven site doesn’t even pass the “nice to have” threshold. It’s lower than that. It’s “nice to take a quick look.” “Nice to distract myself while I’m waiting in line.”
If I want to sell content, I want to focus on things people need to have and are willing to spend money on.
So here’s what I’m wondering. Is it reasonable to expect an ad-supported website to draw an audience that’s interested in paying money?
Is it possible that you need a completely different mindset and approach to create a “top of the funnel” site for selling subscriptions?
Resources
Advertising Week Briefing: Publishers pitch their methods for growing and engaging audiences to marketers
https://digiday.com/media/advertising-week-briefing-publishers-pitch-their-methods-for-growing-and-engaging-audiences-to-marketers/
-
The Quartering
1 hour agoCEO Of X QUITS, Biden's Doctor Off The Hook, Texas Flood Update, Kamala Harris Humiliated
16.7K12 -
LIVE
Dr Disrespect
5 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT vs TARKOV - NEW HARDCORE WIPE (DAY 1)
2,095 watching -
LIVE
Pop Culture Crisis
1 hour ago'SUPERMAN' Box Office TROUBLE? 'Harry Potter' Actor Calls You Racist, Sydney Sweeney MID? | Ep. 873
492 watching -
LIVE
LadyDesireeMusic
16 minutes agoMake Ladies Great Again | Piano Music
47 watching -
1:21:52
Russell Brand
3 hours agoFighting the Devil and Winning – Bas Rutten on Faith, Demons, and Discipline - SF611
155K17 -
10:00
MattMorseTV
21 hours ago $2.65 earnedTrump isn't TAKING the BAIT.
18.7K25 -
LIVE
Barry Cunningham
3 hours agoPRESIDENT TRUMP IS MAKING IT APPEAR THAT THE STORM IS UPON US!
1,970 watching -
LIVE
StoneMountain64
2 hours agoDelta Force PRISON MAP is insane (+ NEW KNIFE Desmoulins' Edge)
86 watching -
LIVE
Viss
4 hours ago🔴LIVE - PUBG's Revival is Underway - Learn The Tactics You Need!
109 watching -
LIVE
Jeff Ahern
1 hour agoNever Woke Wednesday With Jeff Ahern
119 watching