Premium Only Content
Publishers: is this why you can't sell subscriptions?
To sell subscriptions, think about value, not audiences
Bo Sacks sent an email about publishing execs telling advertisers about their ability to grow and engage audiences. That’s getting harder because platforms like Facebook are not promoting publisher content like they used to.
Which gives me a good opportunity to remind everybody not to rely on platforms.
Dominic Carter from The Sun says their audience growth has come from “giving the people what they want,” including coverage of TV celebrities.
At that point I stopped and wondered if this is precisely why media companies are having such trouble selling subscriptions.
The top of the funnel – traffic to the site – is “what people want.” Titillating stuff, I guess. Maybe it’s about who wore what on the red carpet.
That sort of thing attracts eyeballs, and if you do it right you can attract a particular audience, but … what do you have when you’ve done that? Do you have people who are interested in buying something?
Magazine sites struggle to get people to spend $10 on an annual subscription. Meanwhile, people are spending $11 a month on Spotify, and $15 a month on Netflix.
If you can’t sell your product, here are two of the many questions you might ask.
Am I offering something of value?
Am I offering it to the right people?
Is it possible – I’m asking, sincerely – that the “build an audience for advertisers” mindset – and the techniques that come along with it – is a poor match for the “find people who might buy” mindset?
How are you qualifying your prospects?
From an ad perspective, you’re looking for a certain demographic with “an interest” in some subject. But I can have a vague, passing interest in all kinds of subjects where I have no interest at all in spending any money. There’s nothing “need to have” there. It’s just candy. A distraction.
Marketers often talk about the difference between nice to have and need to have. An ad-driven site doesn’t even pass the “nice to have” threshold. It’s lower than that. It’s “nice to take a quick look.” “Nice to distract myself while I’m waiting in line.”
If I want to sell content, I want to focus on things people need to have and are willing to spend money on.
So here’s what I’m wondering. Is it reasonable to expect an ad-supported website to draw an audience that’s interested in paying money?
Is it possible that you need a completely different mindset and approach to create a “top of the funnel” site for selling subscriptions?
Resources
Advertising Week Briefing: Publishers pitch their methods for growing and engaging audiences to marketers
https://digiday.com/media/advertising-week-briefing-publishers-pitch-their-methods-for-growing-and-engaging-audiences-to-marketers/
-
2:14:31
Side Scrollers Podcast
4 hours agoSide Scrollers INVITE ONLY - Live From Dreamhack
119K6 -
1:18:23
Simply Bitcoin
2 days ago $5.03 earnedThe Bitcoin Crucible w/ Alex Stanczyk and Lawrence Lepard
8.52K3 -
1:25:03
Jeff Ahern
4 hours ago $11.90 earnedThe Saturday Show with Jeff Ahern
62.8K8 -
1:31:56
Michael Franzese
19 hours agoWill NBA do anything about their Gambling Problems?
119K26 -
57:26
X22 Report
8 hours agoMr & Mrs X - The Food Industry Is Trying To Pull A Fast One On RFK Jr (MAHA), This Will Fail - EP 14
93K55 -
2:01:08
LFA TV
1 day agoTHE RUMBLE RUNDOWN LIVE @9AM EST
149K12 -
1:28:14
On Call with Dr. Mary Talley Bowden
6 hours agoI came for my wife.
27.9K32 -
1:06:36
Wendy Bell Radio
12 hours agoPet Talk With The Pet Doc
66.6K32 -
30:58
SouthernbelleReacts
2 days ago $9.08 earnedWe Didn’t Expect That Ending… ‘Welcome to Derry’ S1 E1 Reaction
45.5K10 -
13:51
True Crime | Unsolved Cases | Mysterious Stories
5 days ago $20.15 earned7 Real Life Heroes Caught on Camera (Remastered Audio)
61.5K16