7 months ago

775

Oct 20, 2023
The first Debate on excess deaths anywhere in the world. This was the first time, a government minister anywhere in the world answered concerns about the global problem of excess deaths
0:00
Andrew
0:02
bridon thank you Mr Deputy speaker we've
0:05
experienced more excess deaths since
0:08
July 2021 in the whole of
0:11
2020 unlike the pandemic however these
0:14
deaths are not dist proportionately of
0:16
the old in other words the excessive
0:18
deaths are striking down people in the
0:20
prime of life but no one seems to care I
0:24
fear history will not judge this house
0:26
kindly we're still in a country
0:28
supposedly committed to free and Frank
0:30
exchange of views it appears that no one
0:32
cares that no one cares well I care Mr
0:35
Deputy speaker and I credit those
0:37
members here in attendance today who
0:40
also care and I'd also like to thank the
0:42
honorable member for Lincoln for his
0:44
support and I'm sorry that he couldn't
0:46
attend today's debate it's taken a lot
0:49
of effort and more than 20 rejections to
0:51
be allowed to raise this topic but at
0:53
last we're here to discuss the number of
0:55
people dying nothing could be more
0:58
serious numerous countries are currently
1:00
gripped in a period of unexpected
1:02
mortality and no one wants to talk about
1:04
it it's quite normal for death numbers
1:07
to fluctuate up and down by chance alone
1:10
but what we're seeing here is a pattern
1:12
repeated across countries and the rise
1:15
has not let up will he give I'll give
1:18
way to my honorable gentleman I'm I'm
1:20
very grateful and can I commend him for
1:22
his the tenacious way he's he's battle
1:24
on this particular um issue I I
1:27
certainly admire him for that I just
1:29
wondered where where we found the media
1:31
was in all of this because of course
1:33
during the coid pandemic every day the
1:35
media particularly the BBC couldn't wait
1:37
to tell us how many people had died in
1:39
that particular day without any context
1:42
of those figures whatsoever but they
1:44
seem to have gone strangely quiet uh
1:46
over these excess deaths
1:50
now gentleman for his intervention he is
1:52
absolutely right the media have let the
1:54
British public down badly there will be
1:56
a full press pack going out to all media
1:58
Outlets follow following my speech with
2:01
all the evidence to back up all the
2:02
claims are made in that speech but I
2:05
don't doubt there'll be no mention of it
2:07
in the mainstream
2:09
media you might think that a debate
2:11
about excess death is going to be full
2:13
of numbers this speech does not have
2:15
that many numbers because most of the
2:17
important numbers have been kept hidden
2:20
other data has been oddly presented in a
2:23
distorted way and concern people seeking
2:26
to highlight important findings and ask
2:29
questions have found themselves
2:31
inexplicably under attack before
2:34
debating excess debts it's important to
2:36
understand how excess death is
2:38
determined to understand if there is an
2:41
excess by definition you need to
2:42
estimate how many deaths it would have
2:44
been expected the organization of
2:47
economic cooperation development used
2:48
2015 to 2019 as a Baseline and the
2:52
government's office of health dispari is
2:54
an improvement uses 2015 to 2019
2:57
Baseline modeled to allow for AG in and
3:00
I've used that data here unforgivably
3:03
the office of national statistics have
3:05
included deaths in 2021 as part of their
3:08
Baseline calculation for expected deaths
3:11
as if there was anything normal about
3:13
the deaths in
3:14
2021 by exaggerating the number of
3:16
deaths expected the number of excess can
3:19
be minimized why would the on want to do
3:23
that there's just too much that we don't
3:25
know and it's not good enough Mr Deputy
3:27
speaker the on published promptly each
3:30
week the number of deaths that were
3:31
registered and while this is commendable
3:34
it's not the data point that really
3:35
matters there's a total failure to
3:38
collect never mind publish data on
3:40
deaths that are referred for
3:42
investigation to the coroner why does
3:44
this matter a referral means that it can
3:47
be many months and given the backlog
3:50
many years before a death is formally
3:53
registered needing to investigate the
3:55
cause of a death is fair enough failing
3:58
to record when the death happen
4:00
is not because of this problem we
4:02
actually have no idea how many people
4:04
actually died in 2021 even now the
4:07
problem is greatest for the younger age
4:09
groups where there's a higher proportion
4:11
of deaths are investigated this date of
4:14
failure is unacceptable it must change
4:17
there's nothing in a coroners report
4:18
that can bring anyone back from the dead
4:21
and those deaths should be reported the
4:25
youngest age groups are important not
4:26
only because they should have their
4:28
whole lives ahead of them
4:30
if there is a new cause of excess
4:33
mortality across the board it would not
4:36
be noticed so much in the older cohorts
4:38
because the extra deaths would be
4:39
drowned out amongst the expected deaths
4:42
however in the youngest cohorts that is
4:44
not the case there were nearly two extra
4:48
deaths a day in the second half of 2021
4:50
among 15 to 19y old males but
4:53
potentially even more if those referred
4:55
to the coroner were fully included in a
4:58
judicial review of the decision to
5:00
vaccinate yet younger children the on
5:02
refused in court to give anonymized
5:04
details about these deaths they admitted
5:06
that the data they were withholding was
5:09
statistically significant and I quote
5:12
they said the on recognizes that more
5:14
work could be undertaken to examine the
5:16
mortality rates of young people in 2021
5:20
and intends to do so once more reliable
5:22
data are
5:23
available how many more extra deaths in
5:26
15 to 19 year olds would it take to
5:29
trigger such work surely the on should
5:31
be desperately Keen to investigate
5:33
deaths in young men why else have an
5:36
independent body charged with examining
5:37
mortality data surely the on has a
5:40
responsibility to collect data from the
5:42
coroners to produce timely
5:46
information let's move on to old people
5:48
because most deaths in the old are
5:50
registered promptly and we do have a
5:52
better feel for how many older people
5:54
are dying deaths from dementia and
5:57
Alzheimer's show what we ought to expect
6:00
there was a period of high mortality
6:02
coinciding with coid and lockdowns but
6:04
ever since there have been fewer deaths
6:06
than expected after a period of high
6:08
mortality we expect and historically
6:10
have seen a period of low mortality
6:13
because those who have sadly died cannot
6:15
die again those whose deaths were
6:18
slightly premature because of coid and
6:20
lockdowns died earlier than the
6:21
otherwise would have this principle
6:23
should hold true for every cause of
6:26
death and every age group but that's not
6:28
what we're seeing
6:30
even for the over 85y olds according to
6:32
the office of Health Improvement and
6:34
disparities there were 8,000 excess
6:37
deaths 4% above the expected levels for
6:39
the 12 months starting in July 2020 that
6:43
includes all of the Autumn 2020 wave of
6:45
coid when we had tearing the second
6:48
lockdown and it includes all of the
6:50
first coid
6:51
winter however for the year starting
6:54
July
6:55
2022 there have been over 18,000 excess
6:58
deaths in this age group 9% above
7:01
expected levels more than twice as many
7:04
in a period when there should have been
7:05
a deficit and when deaths from diseases
7:08
previously associated with old age were
7:10
actually fewer than
7:12
expected Mr Deputy speaker I've raised
7:14
my concerns around ng1 163 and the use
7:16
of medlam and morphing which may have
7:18
caused and may still be causing
7:20
premature deaths in the vulnerable but
7:22
that is uh sadly a debate for another
7:25
day there were just over 14,000 excess
7:28
deaths in the under 65 year olds before
7:30
vaccination from April 2020 to the end
7:33
of March 2021 however since that time
7:36
there's been over 21,000 excess deaths
7:39
ignoring the registration delay problem
7:41
the majority 58% of these deaths were
7:44
not attributed to coid we turned Society
7:47
upside down before vaccination for fear
7:49
of excess deaths from coid today we have
7:52
substantially more excessed deaths and
7:54
in younger people and there's complete
7:57
and Eerie silence Mr deputy speaker the
8:00
evidence is unequivocal there was a
8:03
clear stepwise increase in mortality
8:05
following the vaccine rollout there was
8:07
a reprieve in the winter of 2021 22
8:10
because there were fewer than expected
8:12
respiratory deaths but otherwise the
8:14
excess has been incessantly at this high
8:17
level ambulance data for England
8:20
provides another clue ambulance calls
8:23
for life-threatening emergencies will
8:25
running at a steady 2,000 calls per day
8:27
until the vaccine roll out from then it
8:29
Rose to 2,500 daily and calls have
8:32
stayed at this level since the
8:35
surveillance systems designed to spot a
8:37
safety problem have all flashed red but
8:39
no one's looking claims for personal
8:42
Independence payments for people who've
8:44
developed a disability and cannot work
8:46
rocketed with the vaccine roll out and
8:49
it's continued to rise ever since the
8:51
same was seen in the USA also started
8:53
with a vaccine rooll that not with coid
8:55
a study to determine the vaccination
8:57
status of a sample of such payments
9:00
would be relatively quick and
9:02
inexpensive to perform yet nobody seems
9:04
interested in ascertaining this Vital
9:07
Information officials have chosen to
9:09
turn a blind eye to this disturbing
9:12
irrefutable and frightening data much
9:15
like Nelson did but for for far less
9:18
honorable reasons he would be ashamed of
9:20
us Mr Deputy speaker furthermore data
9:23
that has been used to sing the Praises
9:24
of the vaccines is deeply flawed only
9:27
one coid related death was prevented in
9:30
each of the initial major trials that
9:32
led to authorization of the vaccines and
9:34
that is taking their data entirely at
9:36
face value whereas a growing number of
9:38
inconsistencies and anomalies suggest we
9:41
ought not to do this extrapolating from
9:44
that means that between 15,000 and
9:47
20,000 people have to be injected to
9:50
prevent a single death from coid to
9:53
prevent a single coid hospitalization
9:55
over 1500 people needed to be injected
9:58
the the trial data showed that one in
10:00
800 injected people had a serious
10:02
adverse event meaning they were
10:04
hospitalized or had a lifechanging or
10:06
life-threatening condition the risk of
10:09
this was twice as high as a chance of
10:11
preventing a coid hospitalization we're
10:13
harming 1 in 800 people to supposedly
10:16
save one in 20,000 this is
10:19
madness the strongest claims have too
10:22
often been based on modeling carried out
10:24
on the basis of flawed assumptions where
10:26
observational Studies have been carried
10:28
out researchers will correct for age and
10:31
comorbidities to make the vaccines look
10:33
better however Mr Deputy speaker they
10:36
never correct for socioeconomic or
10:38
ethnic differences that would make the
10:40
vaccines look worse this matters for
10:43
example claims of high mortality in less
10:45
vaccinated regions in the United States
10:47
took no account of the fact that this
10:49
was the case before the vaccines were
10:51
rolled
10:52
out that is why studies that claim to
10:55
show the vaccines prevented coid deaths
10:57
also showed a are marked effective than
11:00
preventing non-co deaths the prevention
11:02
of non-co deaths is always a statistical
11:05
illusion and claims of prevented coid
11:07
deaths should not be assumed when that
11:09
illusion has not been corrected for and
11:11
when it is corrected for the claims of
11:14
efficacy for the vaccines vanish with it
11:17
co disproportionately killed people from
11:20
ethnic minorities and lower
11:22
socioeconomic
11:24
groups but during the 2020 during the
11:27
pandemic the death among the most
11:29
deprived were up by
11:32
23% compared to 17% for the least
11:35
deprived however since 2022 the pattern
11:38
has reversed with 5% excess mortality
11:41
amongst the most deprived compared to 7%
11:45
among the least deprived these deaths
11:47
are being caused by something different
11:50
in 2020 the excess was highest in the
11:53
oldest cohorts and there were fewer than
11:55
expected deaths amongst the younger age
11:57
groups but since 2022 the 50 to 64 year
12:01
old cohort has had the highest excess
12:04
mortality even the youngest age groups
12:07
are now seeing substantial excess with a
12:10
9% excess in the under 50s since 2022
12:13
compared to 5% now in the over 75
12:17
group despite London being a younger
12:20
region the excess in London is only 3%
12:24
whereas it's higher in every more
12:26
heavily vaccinated region of the UK and
12:29
it should be noted Mr Deputy speaker
12:31
that London is famously the least
12:32
vaccinated region in the UK by some
12:34
margin studies comparing regions on a
12:37
larger scale show the same thing there
12:39
are studies from the Netherlands Germany
12:41
and the whole world each showing that
12:43
the highest mortality after vaccination
12:45
was seen in the most heavily vaccinated
12:48
regions so we need to ask what are
12:50
people dying of since 2022 there has
12:54
been 11% excess in emic heart disease
12:57
deaths and a six 15% excess in heart
13:00
failure deaths in meantime cancer deaths
13:03
only 1% above expected levels which is
13:05
further Evidence this is not simply some
13:08
other factor that affects deaths ac
13:09
across the boards such as a failing to
13:11
account for an aging population or a
13:14
failing nhhs in fact the excess itself
13:17
has a seasonality with a peak in the
13:19
winter months the fact it returns to
13:21
Baseline levels in summer is a further
13:24
indication that this is not due to some
13:26
statistical error or an aging population
13:29
alone Dr CLA Craig from the Heart Group
13:32
first highlighted a stepwise increase in
13:34
Cardiac Arrest calls after the vaccine
13:36
roll out in May 2021 and Hart have
13:39
repeatedly raised concerns about the
13:41
increase in cardiac deaths and they have
13:44
every reason to be
13:45
concerned four participants in the
13:47
vaccine group of the fiser trial died
13:49
from Cardiac Arrest compared to only one
13:52
in the placebo group overall there were
13:54
21 deaths in the vaccine group up to
13:57
March 2021 compared to 7 in the placeo
14:00
group and there are serious anomalies
14:02
about the reporting of the deaths within
14:04
this trial with the deaths in the uh
14:06
vaccine group taking much longer to
14:08
report than those in the placebo group
14:11
and that's highly suggested Mr Deputy
14:13
speaker of a significant bias in what
14:15
was supposed to be a blinded trial an
14:18
Israeli study clearly showed an increase
14:20
in cardiac Hospital attendances among 18
14:23
to 39 year olds that correlated with
14:26
vaccination not with coid there have now
14:29
been several postmortem studies
14:31
demonstrating a causal link between
14:34
vaccination and coronary artery disease
14:36
leading to death up to four months after
14:38
the last
14:39
dose and we need to remember that the
14:41
safety trial was cut short to only 2
14:44
months so there's no evidence of any
14:46
vaccine safety beyond that point the
14:49
decision to unblind the trials after two
14:52
months and vaccinate the placebo group
14:54
is nothing less than a public health
14:56
Scandal everyone involved failed in
14:58
their duty to the truth but no one cares
15:01
Mr Deputy speaker the one place that can
15:04
help us understand exactly what caused
15:06
this is Australia Australia had almost
15:08
no coid when vaccines were first
15:10
introduced making them the perfect
15:12
control group the state of South
15:15
Australia had only a thousand cases of
15:17
coid across its whole population by
15:19
December 2021 before Omicron arrived
15:23
what was the impact of vaccination there
15:26
for 15 to 44 year olds there were was
15:28
historically 1300 emergency cardiac
15:31
presentations a month with vaccine
15:33
rollout in the under 50s this rocketed
15:36
to
15:37
2,172 cases in November 2021 in this age
15:41
group alone a 67% more than usual
15:44
overall there were
15:45
17,900 South Australians who had a
15:48
cardiac emergency in
15:49
2021 compared to only
15:52
13,250 in 2018 a 35%
15:56
increase it is clearly the vaccine that
15:59
must be the number one suspect in this
16:01
and it cannot be dismissed as just a
16:02
coincidence Australian mortality overall
16:04
has increased from early 20121 and the
16:07
increase is due to cardiac deaths these
16:10
excess deaths are not due to an aging
16:12
population because there are fewer
16:14
deaths in the diseases of old age these
16:16
deaths are not an effect of Co because
16:18
they've happened in places where Co have
16:21
not reached and they're not due to low
16:23
Statin prescriptions or undertreated
16:26
hypertension as Chris witty would
16:27
suggest because prescriptions did not
16:30
change and in any effect would have
16:32
taken many years and been very small the
16:34
prime suspect must be something that was
16:36
introduced to the population as a whole
16:38
something novel The Prime hypothesis
16:41
must be the experimental Co 19 vaccines
16:45
the on published a data set of deaths by
16:47
vacc by vaccinated and unvaccinated at
16:50
first glance it appears to show that the
16:52
vaccines are safe and effective however
16:55
there were several huge problems with
16:56
how they presented that data one was
16:59
that for the first 3 we period after
17:00
injection the on claimed there are only
17:02
a tiny number of deaths the number the
17:05
on would normally predict to occur in a
17:07
single week where were the deaths from
17:09
the usual causes when this was raised
17:12
the on claimed that the sickest people
17:14
did not get vaccinated and therefore
17:16
people were uh taking the vaccination
17:18
were were self- selecting for those
17:20
least likely to die not only is this not
17:23
the case in the real world with even
17:25
even hospices heavily vaccinating their
17:27
residents but the 's own data showed
17:30
that the proportion of sickest people
17:32
was equal in the vaccinated and
17:33
unvaccinated groups this inevitably
17:35
raises serious questions about the ons's
17:38
data presentation there were so many
17:41
problems with the methodology used by
17:43
the on that the statistics regulator
17:45
agreed that the on data could not be
17:48
used to assess vaccine efficacy or
17:50
safety that tells you something about
17:52
the on consequently Hart asked the UK
17:55
Health Security Agency to provide the
17:58
data
17:58
it they had on people who had died and
18:00
therefore needed to be removed from
18:02
their vaccination data set this request
18:05
has been repeatedly refused with excuses
18:08
given including the false claim that
18:09
anonymizing this data will be aced
18:11
creating it even though there is case
18:13
law that anonymization is not considered
18:16
creation of new data Mr Deputy speaker I
18:19
believe if this data was released it
18:21
would be damning some
18:23
claim that so many lives have been saved
18:26
by mass vaccination that any amount of
18:27
harm suffering and death caused by the
18:30
vaccines is a price worth paying they're
18:33
delusional Mr Deputy speaker the play
18:35
with 20 million lives sa is based on now
18:37
discredited models which assume that
18:39
coid waves do not Peak without
18:41
intervention there have been numerous
18:43
waves globally that now demonstrate that
18:44
is not the case and it was also based on
18:47
there having been more than half a
18:48
million lives saved in the UK that's
18:51
more than the worst case scenario
18:53
predicted uh at the beginning of the
18:55
pandemic for the claim to have been true
18:57
the rate of which coid killed people
18:59
would have to have taken off
19:00
dramatically at the beginning of 2021
19:02
with the in the absence of vaccination
19:04
this is ludicrous and it Bears no
19:07
relationship to the truth in the real
19:09
world Australia New Zealand and South
19:11
Korea had a mortality rate of 400 deaths
19:14
per million up to the summer of
19:16
2022 after they were first hit with
19:19
Omicron so how does that compare with
19:21
the Wuhan strain France and Europe as a
19:23
whole had a mortality rate of under 400
19:25
deaths per million up to the summer of
19:27
2020 Australia New Zealand and South
19:29
Korea were all heavily vaccinated before
19:32
infection so tell me where where was the
19:34
benefit the UK had just over 800 deaths
19:37
per million up to the summer of 2020 so
19:39
twice as much but we know that Omicron
19:41
is half as deadly as the Wuhan variant
19:44
the death rates per million are the same
19:46
before and after vaccination so where
19:48
was the benefits of vaccination The
19:51
Regulators have failed in their duty to
19:52
protect the public they've allowed these
19:54
novel products to skip crucial safety
19:56
testing by letting them be described as
19:59
vaccines theyve failed to insist on
20:01
safety testing being done in the years
20:03
since the first temporary emergency
20:04
authorization even now no one can tell
20:07
you how much Spike protein is produced
20:09
on vaccination and for how long yet
20:11
another example of where there is no
20:13
data for me to share with the house and
20:16
when it comes to properly recording
20:17
deaths due to vaccination the system's
20:19
broken not a single doctor reg death
20:22
from a rare brain brain pot before docks
20:24
in Scandinavia forced the issue and the
20:27
MH ackn the problem only then did these
20:29
deaths start to be certified by doctors
20:31
in the UK it turns out that doctors were
20:34
waiting for permission from the
20:35
regulator and The Regulators waiting to
20:37
be alerted by the doctors this is a
20:39
lethal circularity furthermore coroners
20:41
have written regulation 28 reports
20:43
highlighting deaths from vaccination to
20:46
prevent further deaths yet the MH said
20:48
in a response to an foi that they had
20:50
not received any of them the system we
20:53
have in place is clearly not functioning
20:54
to protect the public The Regulators
20:57
also missed the fact that the fiser
20:58
trial in the fiser trial the vaccine was
21:01
made for the trial participants in a
21:02
highly controlled environment in stark
21:05
contrast to the manufacturing process
21:07
used for the public rollout which was
21:09
based on a completely different
21:11
technology and just only just over 200
21:14
participants were given the same product
21:16
that was given to the public but not
21:18
only was the data from these people
21:20
never compared to those in the trial for
21:22
efficacy and safety but the MH have
21:25
admitted that they dropped the
21:26
requirement to provide the data
21:28
that means there was never a trial on
21:30
the fisa product that was actually
21:32
rolled out to the public and that
21:34
product has never been compared to the
21:37
product that was actually
21:38
trial the vaccine mass production
21:41
processes use Vats of eera coli and
21:44
present a risk of contamination with DNA
21:46
from the bacteria as well as bacterial
21:48
cell walls which can cause dangerous
21:51
reactions this is not theoretical Mr
21:53
Deputy speaker this is now sound
21:55
evidence that's been replicated by
21:57
several Labs AC across the world and the
21:59
MRNA vaccines uh were contaminated by
22:02
DNA which far exceeded the usual
22:04
permissible levels given that this DNA
22:06
is enclosed in lipid nanoparticle
22:08
delivery system and it's it's arguable
22:10
that even the permissible levels have
22:12
been far too high these lipid
22:14
nanoparticles are known to enter every
22:16
organ of the body as well as this
22:18
potentially causing some of the acute
22:20
adverse reactions seen there is a
22:22
serious risk that this foreign bacterial
22:24
DNA inserting itself into human DNA and
22:28
will anybody investigate no they won't
22:30
will he I'll give away on that
22:32
point conscious that time is tight I I I
22:36
uh recognize that honorable gentleman is
22:38
making a very very powerful case does he
22:40
agree with me that the government should
22:41
be looking at this properly and should
22:43
commissioner review Into the excess test
22:46
partly so that we can reassure our
22:47
constituents that the case he's making
22:49
is not in fact valid and that the
22:52
vaccines have no cause uh Behind These
22:55
excess
22:56
deaths I Thank The Honorable gentle
22:58
support on this topic and of course that
23:00
is what exactly any responsible
23:02
government should do I wrote to the
23:04
Prime Minister on the 7th of August 202
23:06
through with all the evidence of this
23:07
but sadly Mr Deputy speaker I I still
23:10
await a response what will it state to
23:12
take to stop these products the complete
23:14
failure to stop infection was not enough
23:16
and we all know plenty of vaccinated
23:18
people have caught and spread coid the
23:20
mutation of the virus to a weaker
23:21
variant Omicron that that that wasn't
23:24
enough the increasing evidence of the
23:26
serious harms to those of us that were
23:29
vaccinated that's not enough and now the
23:31
cardiac deaths and the deaths of young
23:33
people is apparently not enough either
23:35
it's high time these experimental
23:36
vaccines were suspended and a full
23:38
investigation into the harms they've
23:39
caused initiated history will be a harsh
23:41
judge if we don't start using
23:44
evidence-based medicine we need to
23:45
return to basic science basic ethics
23:47
immediately which means listening to all
23:49
voices and investigating all concerns in
23:52
conclusion Mr Deputy speaker the
23:54
experimental Co 19 vaccines are not safe
23:57
and they're not affective
23:58
despite there only being limited
23:59
interest in the chamber from colleagues
24:02
and I'm very grateful for those who have
24:04
attended we can see from the public
24:05
Gallery there is considerable public
24:07
interest I would implore all members of
24:10
the House present and those not to
24:11
support calls for a three-hour debate on
24:14
this important issue and Mr Deputy
24:16
speaker this might be the first debate
24:17
on excess deaths in our Parliament
24:20
indeed it might be the first debate on
24:21
excess deaths in the world but very
24:23
sadly I promise you it won't be the
24:26
last
24:29
thank you uh Mr Deputy speaker can I
24:32
start by congratulating The Honorable
24:34
member for Northwest leer for securing
24:37
uh this important debate I do only have
24:40
five minutes of the 30 minutes uh debate
24:42
to respond so I will try and cover all
24:45
the points uh if I can can I start by
24:48
acknowledging that he is correct we have
24:51
seen an increase in excess death in the
24:53
last year however his analysis is uh
24:56
something I I will disagree with because
24:58
the causes um that he refers to um are
25:02
are simply um do not uh bear to to the
25:06
statistics that we have there have been
25:08
a combination of factors contributing to
25:10
the increase in excess death including
25:12
in the last year high flu prevalence the
25:14
ongoing challenges of Co 19 we had the
25:16
stpe outbreak and uh conditions such as
25:19
heart disease which he touched on
25:21
diabetes and cancer uh because we had
25:24
virtually a lock down of routine Health
25:26
Services over two year period many of
25:29
those are now coming forward with uh
25:31
increased morbidity and mortality as a a
25:33
result of that and starting with winter
25:35
flu the number of positive tests last
25:38
year peaked at 31.8% the highest seen in
25:41
the last 6 years and interim analysis um
25:45
from the UK HSA indicated the number of
25:47
deaths in England associated with flu
25:50
was Far higher than pre-pandemic levels
25:52
so excess deaths due to flu last winter
25:55
is sadly part of the answer and he
25:57
touched Ed on the independent body of
25:59
the ons well their figures show that the
26:01
leading cause of death in England is
26:02
still dementia which accounts for about
26:04
10% of all deaths but they do also look
26:07
at the cause of excess deaths and if you
26:09
look at the figures uh as of June this
26:11
year the top three causes of excess
26:14
deaths are respiratory illnesses
26:16
dementia and Es schic heart disease
26:18
which is often caused by uh an increase
26:20
in cholesterol uh smoking um not having
26:23
a blood pressure check so there's a
26:24
number of reasons and they are often
26:25
chronic conditions that people have had
26:27
for years decades in fact some people
26:30
and are not uh acute illnesses now just
26:33
to touch on on on some of the points um
26:36
that he has uh made in in his points uh
26:38
in the three minutes I have left uh to
26:41
respond firstly um turning to uh the
26:45
importance of vaccination I think you
26:47
know it's very easy to say that there's
26:49
a a prevalence of high rates of coid
26:52
vaccination in people who have died and
26:54
that is correct when 93.6% of your
26:56
population has had at least one dose of
26:59
the vaccine there will be a high rate of
27:01
vaccination in excess deaths that is
27:04
different to causality I completely
27:06
agree with them there's a high
27:07
prevalence rate that is not the same as
27:09
saying that that is the cause of those
27:11
deaths and the office for NASA
27:13
statistics um has looked um that
27:16
actually those who've been vaccinated
27:18
generally had a lower all cause
27:20
mortality rate than the unvaccinated
27:22
people uh since the booster introduction
27:24
in 2021 and a recent study in Singapore
27:27
actually found that um when they looked
27:30
at uh uh patients who had recovered from
27:33
coid who were unvaccinated they showed
27:35
an increased risk of by 56% more uh to
27:39
be at risk of cardiac complications a
27:41
year later compared to those who were
27:43
vaccinated so there is conflicting data
27:45
on this and I'm not necessarily
27:47
disagreeing with him but I think we need
27:49
to have a robust conversation on this
27:51
and not to assume that one um uh side uh
27:54
necessarily has um all the answers now
27:57
just to touch on the couple of points
27:59
that he made around vaccine safety now
28:01
the regulator has been uh taking account
28:04
of those who report Adverse Events and I
28:06
would encourage anyone who's had a side
28:07
effect from any of the vaccines to use
28:10
the yellow card system to report it to
28:12
their GP because when they have been
28:14
reported the MH has taken action if you
28:17
look in April 21 uh the MH reacted to
28:21
rare cases of concurrent thrombosis and
28:23
thrombocytopenia following the azed
28:25
vaccine uh which resulted in um adults
28:28
under 30 not being offered That vaccine
28:31
and in May 21 that was increased to the
28:33
adults under 40 and particularly to the
28:36
MRA vaccine in June uh 21 following
28:39
reports of a link between um coid
28:42
vaccines and myocarditis uh the
28:44
commission on human medicines conducted
28:46
an independent review which found the
28:48
incident of this side effect was rare
28:50
but it was between one and two cases for
28:52
100,000 so when there is are concerns
28:55
absolutely we must um uh invest
28:57
instigate those there is no doubt about
28:59
it and for those that have experienced
29:01
um rare side effects from the vaccine we
29:04
had to debate earlier this afternoon
29:05
about that we do have the vaccine damage
29:07
payments scheme which um offers a
29:09
payment of
29:10
120,000 if that is uh one show to be
29:14
order order thank you Mr Speaker I'm
29:16
terribly sorry the house stands
29:21
adj