Close And Local Sun

If one can not demonstrate evidence of any single element of the concepts below, and one must verify all for consideration, then the earth is SIMPLY NOT A SPINNING BALL but a motionless circular plain as defined in the Holy Scripture of the Holy Creator.Show more

1.  No motion:  Water (or any liquid) left at rest shows no motion.
2.  No curve:  water (or any liquid) is always flat on its surface.
3.  "space" is fake:  no air pressure on earth without a container.
4.  Jet trails are always flat.
5.  "gravity" by definition is not universal:  ice and wood float on water, birds and insects fly, less spin towards the “poles” so less "gravity" therefore “weight” - never observed, absurd

- ANY indication of motion of the earth
- ANY evidence of "curvature of the earth"
- Evidence of people supposedly “living upside down” in the Southern Hemisphere (physically absurd)
- These two observations alone are enough to destroy "heliocentrism" and the "Copernican theory" of rotating celestial bodies.
- Any evidence of water not maintaining its observably flat surface but "curving" around and adhering to the exterior of anything, especially spinning balls
- Any evidence of airplanes "flying around a curve" instead of flying straight and level at the same altitude
- Any evidence of God in the Bible creating a spinning ball hurling around the sun and traveling through "space" at 1.8 million mph
- Any evidence that "stars" are anything but lights in the sky fixed in the firmament, as explained in the Bible
- Any proof of the THEORIES of "gravity" or "relativity" (both are frauds, proven by a simple analysis of their definition and foundational assumptions)
- Why and how does the theory of "gravity" not only overcome but completely reverse the direction of centrifugal force?
- Any evidence objects turn upside down when traveling south to north between "hemispheres"
- Any evidence that a pressurized gas system can exist next to a vacuum, such as the relatively weak atmospheric pressure of the earth next to the supposed "infinite vacuum" of "space" without a barrier
- Any evidence that vertical objects, i.e., buildings, protrude from a curving surface such that buildings extend perpendicularly from the curved surface and become wider apart the taller they grow.
- Any evidence that plumb lines on a sphere hang parallel, meaning all buildings built on the plumb line (and 99.9% are) should have expanding walls as the building height increases.  But none do, which is observable by looking at any city skyline.
- Any evidence of the "gravitational constant," i.e., any object pulling another based on its size.  If it existed, no dandelion could float away on the breeze and no insect or bird could fly, and no human could leap from the surface.  In reality, the same force that hold trillions of tons of ocean water "tight to the spinning earth" would also have to pull everything else at the same tension, otherwise it is relative and it can not be and still be a "universal force," but it does not.
- Where does the "theory of gravity" explain how "gravity" works in thin air but not in water, such as anything that falls in air but floats in water, such as ice, a block of wood, any plastic, and even the human body?  Where and how does "gravity" explain how 300 tons of rolled steel will sink in the ocean but a 300-ton ship will never sink and can carry 900 tons of cargo?  Why does the "theory of gravity" not explain any of this, as well as why an aircraft weighs 40 tons on the airstrip but weighs less than air after it rolls 80 mph down the runway?  How can "gravity" selectively hold trillions of tons of ocean water to the earth but let dandelions, birds, and insects float away in the breeze and humans leap from the surface of the earth?  Why does the "theory of gravity" not address ANY of these glaring inconsistencies but rather it depends on an absurd man-made concoction of a vacuum for its ONLY MEASUREMENT???