HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud? A Stephen Allen film.

Question Everything
HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud? A Stephen Allen film.
216,233 views 19 Apr 2011
A shocking documentary that exposes
HIV/AIDS as a deceptive and deadly scam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTxvmKHYajQ&t=1sShow more

This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$ machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide plight of human suffering and drove it down the road to hell. Yet this program offers hope, inspired by the courage and articulate arguments of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria. A MUST SEE for anyone interested in truly understanding the facts about HIV/AID$.

Join the Asylum on Telegram: https://t.me/AbsurdBeats
Spotify: Absurd Beats Recordings
Twitter: https://Twitter.com/Absurdbeats54
Youtube (Topic Artists): Absurd Beats Recordings
Donate via: Paypal.me/AbsurdBeats

This video may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright holders. The material is made available in this video as a way to advance research and teaching related to critical media literacy and intercultural understanding, among other salient political and social issues such as; Subliminal imagery and influence, Subconscious manipulation, and the Dark Arts of Kabbalist Masonic Magik. Through context, critical questioning, and educational framing, the video presented by Absurd Beats, therefore, creates a transformative use of copyrighted media. The material is presented for entirely non-profit educational purposes. There is no reason to believe that the featured media clips will in any way negatively affect the market value of the copyrighted works. For these reasons, 'Absurd Beats Recordings' believes that the video is clearly covered under current fair use copyright laws.

Absurd Beats Recordings does not support any actions in which the materials in this video are used for purposes that extend beyond fair use.

Transcript

0:29
they've got to hold on to HIV why to hold on to their funding it's a disgrace
0:35
for any other disease with this much
0:40
disagreement about the cause we would by now have a balanced portfolio they're
0:46
dispersing AZT to two hundred thousand Americans in the name of hypothesis that stands unproven a talk that is the most
0:54
toxic talk that has ever been licensed for long-term consumption in the free world how the United States gave aids to the
1:03
world acquired immune deficiency syndrome known best by its acronym for
1:11
letters we've been told to fear the AIDS crisis is very real
1:16
it's dark form casts a shadow over the statistics of the dead and dying
1:21
virtually non-existent 1980 by 1995 AIDS had afflicted over 1 and a half million
1:27
lives globally half a million in the United States alone AIDS has become the
1:33
leading singular cause of death in u.s. males between the ages of 25 and 44
1:38
it's been called the plague of the century and portrayed like some medieval nightmare it knows no pity who respects
1:45
no limits we've been told that it can strike anyone and everyone is at risk for over 15 years now AIDS has
1:53
terrorized social America and still there is no cure what causes AIDS we've
1:59
been told that AIDS is caused by this tiny retrovirus its name is HIV and
2:04
virtually everyone who is infected with it is expected to develop any one of 30 different diseases all of which
2:11
ultimately result in death to stop HIV and AIDS the US government has enacted
2:16
emergency measures spent 40 billion dollars and mobilized the greatest scientific research effort in the
2:23
history of man the war against AIDS has spent more money and utilized more scientific talent than it took to land
2:29
on the moon all this to fight a microscopic enemy and still there are no
2:34
certain results after 15 years the public asks why there is a good explanation as
2:42
to why the war against AIDS has been a total failure we spent all our time and
2:47
money trying to stop this virus HIV and as many top research scientists have
2:52
tried to point out this virus is not the cause of AIDS for over 10 years this
2:58
argument against HIV has been dismissed by the government suppressed in the media and disputed by the political
3:05
economic powers of the AIDS industry yet since 1987 a growing group of scientists
3:13
continued to make this unnerving allegation AIDS research has not failed because it never found a cure AIDS
3:20
research has failed because it never found the cause is this virus HIV really
3:26
the cause of AIDS if it isn't why are we being told this the virus that causes
3:32
AIDS the virus that causes AIDS the AIDS virus HIV the virus that the
3:38
virus the virus that causes AIDS the public has been very supportive yet with
3:43
over a hundred thousand research papers published on HIV and AIDS there is still no direct proof HIV causes immune
3:50
deficiency the entire government-funded approach to fighting AIDS is based on this unproven hypothesis hanging from a
3:57
frayed thread and with the weight of mounting evidence against it this hypothesis is in serious trouble in fact
4:04
the entire international effort to stop AIDS has all its eggs in one beaker time
4:10
money treatment and millions of human lives hang in the balance if HIV is not the cause of AIDS millions
4:17
of people have been told that they're going to die for no reason at all and hundreds of thousands have been treated
4:22
with permanently impairing drugs some of which could cause AIDS themselves if HIV
4:28
does not cause AIDS how many lives have been lost to a misdiagnosis and how many more will die in the future
4:49
in the next few minutes we will present ten scientific arguments that explain why HIV does not cause AIDS what the
4:58
causes could be and why treatments with dangerous drugs like AZT are unnecessary
5:03
and caused the very disease they're supposed to prevent we will also explain to you why this information has been
5:09
kept back from the public awareness and why the US Department of Health the pharmaceutical industry and AIDS
5:15
activist organizations have perpetrated this myth as citizens taxpayers and
5:21
people who also someday could be at the mercy of a misguided program like this we hope you will see the importance of
5:28
this issue is HIV the cause of AIDS if not as Neville Hodgkinson of the London
5:35
Sunday Times put it then we will have witnessed the greatest medical scientific blunder of the 20th century
6:11
today nearly everyone has been affected by AIDS whether it's a friend or a lover
6:16
a business acquaintance or even a perfect stranger AIDS has had an impact on our entire culture the dread hangs
6:23
silently over society and there's little hope on the horizon it's time we ask
6:28
ourselves some serious questions could we be on the wrong track with HIV have we jumped to conclusions that will
6:35
only lead to a dead end are we willing to accept the truth even if it means that our whole campaign against AIDS has
6:42
been in vain to understand just how HIV
6:48
became the target of this international war on AIDS we have to look back at how it all began what's it into motion the
6:54
chain of events that many say mislead objective science following the depression of the 30s in world war ii
7:01
America emerged into a new era of Technology and prosperity we had more
7:06
time for recreation and self-realization society began to change medical science
7:12
had new breakthroughs we conquered polio the last great infectious epidemic of the modern world soon new antibiotics
7:20
cured everything from minor infections to venereal disease with the invention of the birth control pill came the
7:27
sexual revolution freeing the public from age-old fears and taboos homosexuality to found more freedom of
7:34
expression as gays came out of the closet and formed their own subculture during the Vietnam era of the 60s
7:40
recreational drug use skyrocketed among the young and would continue to grow yet
7:45
we remained optimistic that we could solve all our problems through our new faith in science and technology but
7:53
before long the unforeseen consequences of this new liberated lifestyle began to rear its ugly head silently in the
7:59
headlines the Bell began to toll when the first reports of
8:04
immune-deficiency surfaced in 1981 among a small group of gay men in Los Angeles it was believed to be a result of
8:11
behavior unique to homosexuals but all that changed when similar conditions started showing up in IV drug users and
8:18
hemophiliacs that set off an alarm what had been called gay related immune
8:23
deficiency now appeared to be an infectious disease that might spread throughout the entire population this
8:30
threat of a deadly blood disease being spread by sexual contact was sensationalized by the media and enraged
8:36
gay activists who demanded action from the government public health officials issued strong warnings that this new
8:43
immune disease could be acquired sexually by anyone suddenly immune
8:50
suppression common to drug addicts homosexuals advanced TB patients and scores of other diseases became linked
8:56
together in a microbiological search for a common cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome or AIDS was born and
9:04
as the bathhouses in San Francisco closed and the fear of AIDS spread the
9:09
u.s. department of health came under heavy fire to find the cause and remedy quickly the public was willing to
9:15
believe science could provide a quick fix so the funding began to roll in and the huge army of virus hunters who had
9:22
been unemployed after the unsuccessful virus cancer program went back to work they now turned their full attention
9:29
towards finding the cause and cure for AIDS scientists began to speculate that
9:35
AIDS patients lack the ability to fight infection in the blood due to a shortage of t-cells that coordinate immunity in
9:43
the blood there are two basic kinds of cells the red blood cells that carry oxygen and nutrients to all the body and
9:50
the white blood cells that hunt down kill and destroy infecting bacteria and viruses when an infection occurs white
9:58
blood cells must increase rapidly and produce antibodies to fight it off they do this through the use of cd4 T
10:04
cells that act like infection Detectives t-cells identify invading viruses then
10:10
alert the B lymphocyte blood cells to produce antibodies which attack the infection
10:16
in a normal immune system there are about 600 to 1200 of these t-cells in one microliter of blood plasma but in an
10:23
AIDS patient the number of t-cells drops down below 200 and lower this is what is believed to be the direct cause of AIDS
10:30
even this is questionable though because many AIDS patients have few or no t-cells and remain healthy but one thing
10:37
is certain people with AIDS are losing the ability to generate a strong blood defense against opportunistic infections
10:43
that constantly attack the body so as AIDS progresses the victim becomes less
10:48
and less capable of recovering from common diseases like pneumonia tuberculosis and the flu
10:54
eventually the immune system gives out altogether and the body is ravaged by disease resulting in death the objective
11:02
is clear stop what is killing t-cells and weakening the immune system and you have found a cure for AIDS but what
11:08
exactly is killing the t-cells is it really HIV in the beginning a number of
11:14
different causes were suggested drugs like heroin cocaine poppers barbiturates and amphetamines had all been observed
11:21
to harm the immune system also malnutrition repeated infection overuse of antibiotics and stress but these
11:28
behavior related causes were politically incorrect with gay activists who wanted
11:33
to distance themselves from the idea that aids might be self-inflicted and government-funded research programs
11:40
needed money in promised results so the decision was made politically to abandon
11:45
the behavior aids model for the infectious epidemic model and the virus hunters pressed on self convinced that
11:52
aids could be stopped by a vaccine or a treatment two of these were Robert Gallo
11:57
from the National Cancer Institute and max Essex from Harvard who had made public speculations by 1982 that aids
12:05
might be caused by a retrovirus Gallo's earlier research with retroviruses in
12:11
the cancer program had been a failure none of the viruses he studied could be directly linked to the cause of a
12:16
disease and his research yielded no benefit to the patient whatsoever but
12:22
one virus htlv 3 got Gallo's full attention it was this virus or as Gallo
12:28
claimed a ver that would become the virus that causes AIDS
12:34
yes fight that fight that fight that
12:40
writing the world wind of public demand Gallo made his move on April 23rd 1984
12:46
Secretary of Health and Human Services Margaret heckler and Robert gallo called a press conference together that would involve
12:52
the United States Department of Health in what critics claimed would become the biggest medical scientific blunder of
12:58
all time first the probable cause of AIDS has been found variant of a known human
13:05
cancer virus called HL 2 htlv III with
13:11
htlv 3 Gallo's white elephant virus program made the jump from the cause of cancer to become the cause of AIDS and
13:19
the target of billions of dollars in research funds simultaneously as the press conference was going on the blood
13:26
test used to detect HIV was being patented which would earn the US Department of Health over a hundred
13:31
million dollars a year and large financial kickbacks to Robert Gallo the AIDS industry was born and the US
13:38
government was now fully invested naively secretary heckler predicted that
13:43
a vaccine would be ready for testing by 1986 we hope to have such a vaccine
13:49
ready for testing in approximately two years for the moment everyone was happy
13:55
about this discovery of the probable cause of AIDS gay activists were satisfied that the government was
14:01
finally doing something but the public was not aware that Gallo had bypassed a
14:06
major checkpoint before making his announcement he had not submitted his test results to other scientists for
14:13
peer-review no one had a chance to critique or verify his claim and his test results were not published in
14:19
science magazine until one week after the press conference this was a dangerous violation of scientific
14:26
protocol suddenly a challenge to gallows ethics emerged which would become an
14:32
international scandal the institut pasteur ER in paris claimed that Gallo's AIDS virus was identical to La Vie a
14:39
virus dr. Luke Monta I had sent gallows lab six months before the press conference the French were
14:45
outraged and filed an international lawsuit against the US Health Department on grounds that Gallo had pirated their
14:52
discovery the entire incident was embarrassing to the United States and
14:58
had to be resolved diplomatically by President Reagan and Prime Minister Jacques Chirac of France with this
15:05
arrangement to split the profits made on the HIV blood tests the virus was given a new international name the human
15:12
immunodeficiency virus or HIV despite questions of Gallo's character
15:18
and ethics HIV had now gained international acceptance but when Gallo's HIV results were finally
15:24
published in science magazine only 44 of 93 AIDS patients he tested that's less
15:30
than half had the virus yet Gallo claimed that in further studies he could find HIV and up to 90% of those he
15:37
tested as other virologists reproduced Gallo's research they found similar correlations between HIV and AIDS
15:44
patients this high correlation seemed convincing to everyone that HIV must
15:49
have something to do with causing AIDS everyone that is except dr. Peter
15:55
Duesberg at the University of California and Berkley Duesberg became a world-renowned retroviral adjust in the
16:02
cancer program and the first man to map the genetic structure of retro viruses like HIV back in 1970 his honours
16:10
include membership in the National Academy of Sciences due to his discovery of cancer-causing genes having
16:16
researched retroviruses for over 30 years some have called him the world's foremost expert in retrovirology dr.
16:24
Duesberg was somewhat skeptical of Gallo's AIDS virus announcement I wasn't
16:30
mad leaked impressed by it because what else would you expect from a person like Gallo who had studied retroviruses all
16:37
his life that he would say retros is causing AIDS that seemed to be the first
16:42
coincidence that make me wonder whether that was an authentic claim or going to
16:47
be an authentic claim but you would say it was not a surprise that he would say
16:53
that he said it or that it would cause leukemia or things like Alzheimer disease neurological diseases and it failed so I
17:01
must wonder I was not too impressed that this work was going to be a winner now and it would have been for the first
17:07
time that a retrovirus would have been pinned down as a cause of a human
17:12
disease or even a disease in wild animals for 18 months Peter Duesberg
17:19
studied every scientific publication on HIV and AIDS he could get a hold of when
17:25
he finally published his observations in cancer research in 1987 he stood alone against the tide of popular opinion and
17:31
the government-funded AIDS industry his position has become well known he argues
17:37
that HIV is not causing AIDS it's a harmless passenger virus that has lived in humans for centuries without causing
17:44
diseases he believes AIDS is the result of other non-infectious factors like drug use and
17:49
ironically enough AZT the highly toxic medication prescribed to treat AIDS
17:55
patients actually does what the virus cannot that is causes AIDS itself though
18:01
dr. dews Berg's arguments were ridiculed by many and ignored by most many of his colleagues studied his research and came
18:07
to the same conclusion something is terribly wrong with the war on AIDS dr.
18:13
richard strowman recalls the impact of dews Berg's arguments in cancer research it was a remarkable review and it raised
18:21
the fundamental issues about virus virus virus as a cause of both cancer end and
18:29
immunosuppression basic questions that haven't been really responded to in any
18:36
meaningful way in in the almost ten years since that paper was published
18:42
soon other top scientists joined Duesberg and strowman in questioning the HIV hypothesis also Nobel Prize winners
18:50
dr. Walter Gilbert of Harvard and Kary Mullis who invented the PCR dr. Charles
18:55
Thomas a former Harvard professor organized a consortium of 12 signatories to address the issue they wouldn't I
19:02
become the group for scientific reappraisal of the hiv/aids hypothesis we started out by writing a letter to
19:10
nature calling for a reappraisal of the evidence for and against the hypothesis that HIV did in fact do all these things
19:17
and there were about 10 or 12 signatories to this letter and it was
19:23
rejected even though many of the signers of the letter were certainly reputable
19:29
people we tried nature magazine and it was ignored then we tried the New
19:36
England Journal JMA and so forth and Lancet in each case we were rejected
19:41
that they would not publish this letter it was only four sentences long it read
19:48
it is widely believed by the general public that a retrovirus called HIV
19:53
causes a group of diseases called AIDS many biomedical scientists now
19:59
questioned this hypothesis we propose a thorough reappraisal of the existing
20:06
evidence for it against this hypothesis be conducted by a suitable independent group we further propose that critical
20:13
epidemiological studies be devised and undertaken not is certainly a hardly a
20:19
bomb-throwing letter but nonetheless they would have none of it and being
20:24
rejected made us angry so we decided to extend the list of signatories so it
20:30
jumped to 30 then to 15 then to 100 and then by 1994 up to 600 188 of whom have
20:40
advanced degrees we published a newsletter we have a website so it's a
20:47
fairly large organization now though the scientific establishment has
20:52
continually ignored Duesberg and the group for reappraisal some individuals are having second thoughts at the San
20:59
Francisco International AIDS Conference in 1990 dr. Luke montagnier who discovered the virus originally six
21:06
months before Gallo's claim made a startling statement HIV might be
21:11
harmless against his own interest montagnier statement should have been earth-shaking but the conventioneers
21:18
paid it little attention and went right on talking about new antiviral drug treatments why is the scientific
21:25
community ignoring the dangerous ramifications of this essential question about the cause of AIDS do we have an
21:32
answer yes in retrospect we certainly do too many people are making too much
21:38
money out of it and money is much stronger than truth if the AIDS
21:44
establishment will not respond to this issue that it's time that the public heard the evidence against HIV and
21:50
demand answers for the next few minutes we'll show you why HIV fails as the
21:56
cause of AIDS and what the real causes could be we will also explain to you why AIDS is not being caused by conventional
22:03
sex and why the clean needle and safe sex programs will do little to stop AIDS you'll have to pay close attention and
22:10
do some thinking first ten scientific reasons why HIV is not the cause of AIDS
22:16
to begin with let's take a close microscopic look at the virus itself number one HIV like all other viruses is
22:25
harmless after antibody immunity HIV is a retrovirus retroviruses reproduce
22:31
themselves through a process called reverse transcription its receptacle attaches to the coding of the T cell it
22:38
penetrates the cell and encodes its RNA genes into the cells DNA and as the cell
22:44
multiplies the new viruses break free and go on to reproduce themselves in other cells like all viral infections
22:52
HIV reproduces rapidly immediately after it infects the body causing a slight fever and some cold symptoms
22:59
but nature has given the human body a built-in defense called antibodies these tiny protein molecules are generated by
23:06
the B lymphocyte blood cells to track down and kill invading infections like HIV antibodies scour the entire system
23:13
until all the invading germs are dead or become dormant and inactive antibodies
23:19
are the reason why we get well after a cold and become immune to diseases like chickenpox or the measles ironically
23:26
when a person is tested for HIV with the blood test they are not testing for the virus but the antibody that has been
23:33
generated to stop it when a person tests positive to HIV they have produced their own antibody vaccine
23:40
which means they are now immune to the virus all infectious diseases must win
23:45
the race against the immune systems antibodies to kill the host there are no known diseases that ever really illness
23:52
after the antibodies have done their job no there's no such disease no precedent
23:58
for it all other microbes cause diseases primarily before immunity before
24:04
anybody's around and that's the only reason why you and I are talking now because antibodies protect us against
24:11
microbes once you have antibodies you're safe against these microbes the whole basis for vaccinations 200 years old at
24:18
Regina came up with that for others too but he did is his name in it there's not
24:24
one president where Michael only causes disease after immunity some come back
24:29
there are always some marginal exceptions if you do through this generalization it's not a real exception
24:34
but partial but none ever had the cost of disease only after antibodies
24:40
appeared which is how it's is defined no every 8th grade biology student
24:45
should question why this basic fact of science has been turned upside down with HIV the taxpayer should ask why we've
24:53
spent 12 years and billions of dollars developing a vaccine against HIV when
24:58
the best vaccine possible already exists when an individual test positive reason
25:05
number 2 HIV does not kill the t-cells it infects AIDS patients are losing
25:10
t-cells and because these are the cells HIV infects it was assumed that HIV was
25:15
killing them but only under rare laboratory conditions do retroviruses kill their host cells in fact Robert
25:22
Gallo and other AIDS researchers used T cells to grow the virus because T cells live quite compatibly with HIV this
25:30
claim that a retrovirus was killing T cells was what sparked Peter Duesberg suspicions based on his experience with
25:36
retroviruses in cancer research and Hagel comes along as well HIV is causing
25:42
AIDS by killing T cells the T cells are killed the immune deficient and immune
25:47
deficiency produces AIDS that didn't seem to fit with everything we ever
25:53
learned about retroviruses knew about that was namely the plateau viruses do not kill cells retroviruses are set
26:04
apart from virtually all other animal viruses we know human and animal viruses
26:09
in that they do not kill the cell they infect ever they are not killer viruses
26:15
that's why they are at least plausible cancer viruses causing a disease a
26:21
values that could cause a cancer a disease would be one that couldn't kill
26:27
a cell if it killed the cell there wouldn't be a cancer reason number three HIV does not infect enough T cells to
26:34
cause AIDS even if HIV killed the T cells it infects it does not infect enough cells
26:40
to cause AIDS shortly after HIV is brought under control by the antibody defense the
26:45
billions of virus particles become dormant and begin to disappear before long the virus can hardly be found in T
26:52
cells at all infecting only one cell out of every 1,000 and sometimes as few as one cell out of every 100,000 on the
27:00
other hand T cells can reproduce at the rate of 5% a day simple math proves that
27:05
HIV cannot infect enough T cells to cause them to die off and bring down the entire immune system even supporters of
27:13
HIV admit that this low amount of T cell infection is a challenge to explain AIDS
27:18
patients are characterized by the deficiency or depletion of T cells
27:24
they lacked essence that's why there it's patience but when the first data
27:30
appeared in fact many of them gallows the first little good data on that came
27:35
from Carlos lab the surprising news was there was no virus found in t-cells
27:43
practically none in fact the notorious difficulties of our nation's leading at
27:49
that time leading AIDS researcher Robert Gallo in finding the virus led him to his now well-known problems with
27:58
essentially appropriating or mr. Pope heading speak stealing dividers for montagnier he couldn't isolate the virus
28:04
because there was no virus there not because he is incompetent simply he confirmed what we are just talking about
28:10
the issue no vials in AIDS patients only antibodies against it so if one in thousand cells or even one in hundred
28:16
cells is infected by a virus you want to get a disease from it you won't die from it in order to die from a depletion of T
28:24
cells you would need to have a virus that kills more than half of them it's
28:30
it's like saying you're dying you're twenty five year old men suffering a fatal disease or dying from a fatal
28:36
disease because you stuck yourself with a needle or cut yourself while shaving you're losing about 100 of thousands of
28:43
your blood with a bad cut in shaving you're not going to die from that but that's what Gallo this hypothesis has
28:49
actually said reason number four HIV has no AIDS causing gene HIV has no specific
28:57
gene or unique genetic reason to cause AIDS all retroviruses have only three
29:03
major genes gag n and Paul and only six minor genes because the genes and
29:09
genetic sequences are so limited in these very simple little viruses they need all the genes to replicate HIV is
29:16
almost identical to all other retroviruses genetically what most people do not know is that there are as
29:23
many as fifty to a hundred of these retro viruses that can be found in every healthy human body all of the same three
29:30
genes and all are kept under control by antibodies after infection HIV behaves
29:36
no differently than the others in the way that you Tate's becomes dormant and reactivates so the question is if none of these
29:43
other retroviruses cause diseases why should HIV or vice versa if HIV causes
29:49
AIDS why don't all the rest so there's no genetic reason to explain why HIV
29:55
would cause AIDS number five there is no such thing as a slow virus HIV is said
30:02
to be a slow virus that takes 10 to 12 years after infection to cause AIDS the
30:08
only way to explain this is to give HIV magical abilities to reactivate mutate
30:13
migrate and hibernate these slow virus hypotheses were devised by scientists
30:19
like Gabi 2nd Gallo who used them to buy time when their disease-causing agent
30:24
failed to perform they based their slow virus hypotheses on studies of epstein-barr which was supposed to cause
30:30
a cancer ten years after infection and herpes viruses that hide in reemerge in
30:36
persons who have suppressed immunity and can't generate a sufficient defense but these differ greatly from HIV because in
30:44
both cases large amounts of active virus can be found causing specific symptoms in total
30:50
contrast HIV is inactive then is said to cause 30 different diseases 10 years
30:56
later none of which are specific to HIV itself Peter Duesberg says there's no
31:02
such thing as a slow virus only slow virologists a virus including a
31:09
retrovirus causes a disease within days weeks or at the very most a month after
31:16
infection and that is not a mysterious number that number is a direct function
31:21
of the generation time of the virus the time a virus needs to infect a cell and generate new virus particles and that
31:29
takes with all viruses we know of in humans all of them including HIV and including all retroviruses at the very
31:36
most one or two or three weeks so whatever a virus could possibly do has
31:42
to happen in that time period or else it's not caused by that virus and with
31:48
AIDS everybody even from the very beginning talked about a so-called minimal latent period
31:53
of or every latent period of one year and now they have raised that to ten years in other words we are buying lots
32:01
and lots of time for something else to cause the disease that is in fact blamed on the virus there is not in ten or
32:08
twelve years of research thirty-five billion by the American taxpayer alone not to mention private organizations and
32:15
companies and other countries there is not even a shred of light on this
32:21
question why it would take ten years from the infection to a disease in fact
32:27
it's impossible reason number six HIV is not a new virus so HIV would not
32:33
suddenly cause a new epidemic AIDS cases have increased dramatically from zero in
32:39
1980 to half a million by 1996 so researchers assumed that it could only
32:44
be caused by a new virus spreading quickly into the population and old virus would have caused an AIDS epidemic
32:50
years ago possibly even centuries ago so HIV must be a new infection to cause the
32:56
recent AIDS epidemic but here again the hiv/aids proponents bypassed yet another
33:02
essential question of logic how old is HIV and where did it come from
33:07
there is about green monkey bites and traveling gay flight attendants run in the headlines but no one in the entire
33:13
government-funded research program has bothered to verify the age of HIV Peter
33:20
Duesberg says HIV is very old using the fundamental means of dating viruses found in far as law if I was a pretty
33:28
shamba numerologist William finest first part of the 19th century who noted when
33:33
a new epidemic comes into a population like AIDS is said to be new or the virus
33:42
causing it is said to be new as well and then it spreads exponentially in that
33:49
population not translated into current tabloid newspaper reporting it explodes
33:54
into that population like a seasonal flu epidemic that's what far slaw says but
34:00
if a microbe and disease is known established then it's old so when you look at HIV in
34:09
America you'll find ever since it can be detected 1 million Americans are positive that was first reported by the
34:14
Centers for Disease Control in 1985 and has since been repeated over and over
34:20
and over every 10 every year for 10 years 11 years now almost 12 years now so if it's in 1 million Americans for 10
34:27
years here every single year that can't be no and those statistics are harder
34:33
than anything we ever had in microbiology 25 million Americans are tested once here's 10% a Gallup poll is
34:39
usually on the within a percentile when you test 10,000 Americans or 5 cells and
34:45
they call it my phone and they get it within the percentage accuracy this is done on 25 million people for 10 years
34:51
nothing has ever been checked so carefully that's an extremely hard number best thing is 8 years old
34:57
this viruses in America is older than America it came in with the immigrants
35:02
that's older than the Constitution so HIV is not a new virus and many of the
35:09
people who have antibodies to it got it perinatally or from their mothers not from dirty needles or unsafe sex and
35:16
have lived full healthy lives for centuries without AIDS number 7 HIV fails
35:23
Koch's postulates the universal test used by scientists to determine if a
35:29
disease is truly being caused by an infection was designed over a hundred years ago by Robert who discovered
35:34
the bacteria that causes TB HIV fails this test Koch's postulates state first the virus
35:42
or bacteria must be found in all cases of the disease second this germ must be isolated from the infected host and
35:49
grown in a pure culture third the germ must cause the same disease when injected into a new healthy host and
35:55
finally the germ must be found growing again in the newly diseased host HIV
36:01
fails postulate number one because ten to twenty percent of all AIDS patients have no HIV at all when HIV can be found
36:08
it is only in very small amounts and usually dormant HIV passes postulate
36:14
number two only on a technicality it can be isolated but it takes huge amounts of cell tissue to find it then a difficult
36:20
chemically-induced process is needed to reactivate the virus by contrast large amounts of active virus can easily be
36:27
found with other diseases HIV fails postulate 3 hands down HIV does not
36:32
cause AIDS when injected into test animals like chimpanzees and more importantly human health care workers
36:38
accidentally infected with HIV rarely get AIDS unless they use drugs and AZT
36:44
Robert Gallo and the HIV orthodoxy have dismissed Koch's postulates is old and
36:49
out-of-date with modern medicine but the postulates have stood the test of time and scientists who have ignored and
36:55
bypassed them have done so at their own peril time after time with diseases like scurvy berry berry
37:02
pellagra smile and even the failed virus cancer program all ignored Koch's
37:07
postulates and all proved to be non-infectious all efforts to find infectious causes
37:12
ended in a dismal failure and now HIV and AIDS it's obvious that HIV fails to
37:19
cause AIDS beneath the microscopic lens and on the drawing board but it doesn't fly in the population studies either
37:24
when we use the telescopic lens to observe the population at large HIV s failure becomes linked to real
37:31
names and faces the population studies prove beyond a doubt that HIV does not cause AIDS number 8 AIDS has remained in
37:41
its original risk groups for over 12 years when an infectious epidemic strikes it
37:46
begins in small clusters then quickly spreads throughout the entire population if a disease does not spread it is not
37:53
contagious and must be caused by something non-infectious figures compiled by the
37:58
Centers for Disease Control confirm that AIDS is not spreading into the population at large and is locked in its
38:05
original risk groups homosexual males IV drug users hemophiliacs and blood transfusion
38:11
patients make up 97% of all AIDS patients and have continued at that rate
38:16
for over 10 years the remaining 3 percent of AIDS patients outside these risk groups are made up of persons who
38:22
suffer from immunodeficiency at random and just happen to be infected with HIV
38:27
if AIDS is truly being caused a virus the patients who do not fit into
38:33
these risk groups would be growing above the 3% as the disease spread but AIDS
38:39
has failed to spread into the female population also when the US Army began testing new recruits for HIV in 1984
38:46
they discovered an amazing fact HIV infection was evenly spread between
38:52
males and females 5050 and it's remained that way since then it should follow that AIDS would be
38:59
50% male and 50% female yet 9 out of every 10 people who develop AIDS
39:05
continue to be male a germ related disease should be spread evenly between
39:10
the sexes and though HIV is evenly spread ninety percent of all US AIDS cases develop only in males this could
39:18
explain why drug use is more related to AIDS than HIV infection in the u.s. males use over 80% of all hard
39:25
psychoactive drugs and among the women with AIDS over half use IV drugs also in
39:32
times past every infectious disease has taken its toll on doctors nurses and health care workers who work with the
39:38
infected yet AIDS has failed to spread here as well with over 500,000 cases of
39:44
AIDS hardly one physician has developed AIDS as a result of an occupational HIV
39:49
infection in healthcare workers and laboratory technicians who cultivate high amounts of active HIV there have
39:56
been hundreds of confirmed accidental exposures and infections yet within the field of five million health care
40:03
workers only a handful of cases of AIDS have been reported and even these are highly disputed from the statistics
40:10
generated by this vast population study it becomes evident AIDS is more related
40:15
to behavior in specific medical risks than it is to HIV infection even
40:20
supporters of HIV concede AIDS is not becoming the world pandemic that was
40:25
predicted reason number nine international comparison of AIDS differ
40:31
greatly a germ related disease would affect a population in the same way around the world for example an outbreak
40:38
of cholera in India would be similar to an outbreak in Honduras but statistics are totally different in the
40:45
US and Western industrialized nations compared to Africa in the u.s. AIDS
40:50
patients are 90 percent male but in Africa AIDS is evenly spread between the sexes in the u.s. AIDS resides among
40:58
risk groups at the rate of 97% yet in Africa AIDS has no risk groups and is
41:03
found at random in the general population only 62 percent of the AIDS diseases in the u.s. are microbial but
41:10
in Africa that number is approximately 90 percent likewise the AIDS diseases in the u.s. that are not germ related make
41:17
up 38% of the total a number that does not correlate with Africa at only 10 percent HIV is believed to have
41:24
originated in Africa where an estimated 14 million have the virus because of malnutrition and other health conditions
41:31
conducive to AIDS statistics from Africa should be at least 14 times higher than in the u.s. yet surprisingly it's quite
41:39
the opposite people infected with HIV in the u.s. develop AIDS at a rate 10 to 20
41:44
times faster than Africans figures from the CDC in the World Health Organization
41:49
have confirmed this since 1987 through 1995 so the question is why would the
41:55
AIDS epidemic behave so differently in the industrialized world one good explanation is that HIV does not cause
42:02
AIDS and the real causes are hard psychoactive drugs used primarily in the US and Europe Duesberg questions if what
42:10
is being called AIDS in Africa is really the same epidemic but the African epidemic I think is a completely
42:18
different epidemic it's a affects men and women alike in in America AIDS is
42:24
90% men and in Europe 90% men debts epidemiologically as different as day and night 52 percent compared to 90
42:32
percent is completely different that's a totally different epidemic the African one and the diseases likewise are very
42:40
different in the two continents so clinically in the epidemiologically the
42:45
two epidemics are very different and in Africa it's possibly malnutrition
42:51
parasitic infection and poor sanitation it effects their Nova scopes there's not homosexuals or intravenous drug users
42:58
it's just poor people without running water without supermarkets without
43:04
doctors the London Sunday Times questions whether AIDS in Africa is a myth quoting dr. Konya hulu if tens of
43:13
thousands are dying of AIDS in Africa where are their graves well one of our one of the members of our group is a
43:19
fella called Phillipe Cronin who is therein up there in Tanzania Tanzania
43:26
which is thought to be the epicenter of the AIDS outbreak and very he and his
43:33
wife Evelyn I went to deal with orphans
43:38
with AIDS they're kind of well-to-do French do-gooders who by the way garlic
43:46
quite a lot of money from France I'm told and who popularized the idea of AIDS in Africa well after being on the
43:53
ground there in Tanzania for a couple of years he reported that after the all
43:59
this time we have to conclude that there is no AIDS and there are no orphans the
44:06
people that were thought to be orphans were actually being taken care of by their grandparents while their own
44:12
parents were often doris salam making money they came back at the end of the dry season or something like that it's a
44:17
it's an amazing story the the age diseases that these people were suffering from were just the same old
44:24
diseases that everybody was suffering from in Africa from time immemorial the only difference now is that if it was
44:31
called an AIDS disease then w-h-o and the United Nations send money if it's
44:39
called the diarrhea what's new about a diarrhea in Africa but if it's an AIDS
44:45
diarrhea when the United States sends money finally reason number 10 AIDS
44:52
occurs without HIV infection and most people with HIV never develop AIDS the
44:59
evidence in support of the HIV hypothesis is based solely on correlation because the virus is often
45:05
found in most AIDS patients we have assumed HIV is NEADS but the logic that assumption is
45:10
flawed because correlation does not prove causation for example the presence
45:16
of HIV and AIDS patients is no more proof of the cause than the presence of birds on powerlines prove that the birds
45:22
caused power failures they only correlate so if HIV is a harmless passenger virus that only correlates
45:29
with other real causes of AIDS we should expect to see two things people with AIDS who are not infected with HIV and
45:36
HIV infected people who are healthy and do not get AIDS and that is exactly what
45:42
is happening what's also important is that different risk groups develop different diseases
45:47
why would HIV supposedly cause one set of diseases naívi drug users and another
45:53
set in homosexual males unless HIV is not the cause and other causes are at
45:59
work do we find these specific AIDS diseases in the risk groups among persons who do not have the virus the
46:05
answer is definitely yes diseases like Kaposi sarcoma and advanced
46:11
cytomegalovirus which strike primarily gay males have been found in numerous homosexual men who do not have HIV but
46:18
these men have one common denominator the use of nitrite inhalants as aphrodisiacs that are known to be
46:24
immunosuppressive thousands of American drug addicts who are not infected with HIV get the same tuberculosis wasting
46:32
syndrome and pneumonias and even lose the same cd4 T cells as those who are HIV positive the slow death that
46:40
resembles aids in heroin addicts has been observed and documented in the medical literature since 1898 so in
46:48
these two risk groups that comprise over ninety percent of US AIDS cases there are other factors at work that could
46:55
cause AIDS and have for years Peter Duesberg says there are 4621 documented
47:01
AIDS cases without HIV and this number is much lower than it may actually be
47:08
4621 so that was in 93 in the meantime I could probably easily get this number
47:15
over 5,000 but the number isn't going as fast as it could shoot
47:21
because if a person is reported within clinical aids diagnosis and is HIV
47:28
negative he or she will not appear in national aid statistics they will say was Capozzi that's not AIT's it's
47:35
pneumonia or Pneumocystis pneumonia it's not AIDS because it's not hiv-positive and people are I mean I know in fact
47:42
people are examples of people who taught me under condition of anonymity they had
47:48
observed these in Stanford and in San Francisco the public health and were pressured not to publish this simply not
47:55
to mention it or if they published it not in an AIDS Journal and then it's listing the same thing is happening in
48:02
England and everywhere else so these cases mostly date from the early days on HIV and AIDS and in the
48:08
80s and early 90s when people were still genuinely asking is HIV actually found
48:14
in all AIDS cases they reported actually 4621 cases that I could easily find of
48:21
AIDS diagnosis in the absence of HIV and more have accumulated sins but not as many because people know now what to say
48:29
what not to say in order to survive and this competitive world the official
48:35
definition of AIDS is designed to eliminate every case of AIDS that presents an embarrassing non correlation
48:41
against HIV the official definition of AIDS is Saudi previously known all diseases in the presence of antibody
48:47
against HIV so if you have Kaposi sarcoma and HIV antibodies you an AIDS
48:53
patient without it your Capozzi patient pneumonia with HIV antibodies is aids in
48:58
the absence is pneumonia dementia in the absence of HIV antibodies is dementia
49:04
and with it it's aids that's the it's definition there is no HIV specific disease anywhere unlike any
49:13
other microbe that causes a specific seat disease just like an instrument
49:19
makes a specific sound HIV doesn't make a specific sound it causes is set to
49:27
cause 30 previously known diseases when it's there and when it's not there the original
49:33
causes of these diseases are responsible for them that is the official definition
49:38
of AIDS not my joke using this official definition HIV
49:44
proponents arrive at a near hundred percent correlation between the virus and AIDS and remember the HIV hypothesis
49:51
is based solely on correlational evidence and you can find a correlation there's no question about it
49:57
if you ignore all the cases where there isn't a correlation you have a correlation but that is that's but that
50:02
is that's a very bad science and it's very bad epidemiology as well critics
50:08
say this correlation is not objective or scientific and deceptively self-fulfilling it's a self-fulfilling
50:14
prophecy yes science is designed to to to get around so fulfilling prophecies but in
50:20
this case that said it's proceeding on the basis of one finally the most
50:26
convincing argument against HIV the millions of people worldwide who have the virus and are not becoming sick this
50:34
is very apparent in Africa where 97 percent of those with HIV are healthy and do not have AIDS documented AIDS
50:41
cases amount to only 3 percent also in the u.s. we're only half a million
50:47
infected have progressed to full-blown AIDS over a 15 year latency period and this figure does not account for the 19
50:54
new diseases defined by the CDC as aids and 62,000 AIDS patients who are never
51:00
tested for the virus it is evident HIV does not cause AIDS in most people and
51:06
this evidence becomes stronger every year Robert Gallo Anthony foutch II and
51:11
the entire scientific and political campaign based on HIV are in serious serious trouble and as the foundation of
51:19
the scientific support for this multi-billion dollar hypothesis crumbles the real causes of AIDS will continue to
51:27
take hundreds of thousands of lives yet the hollow campaign goes on and on like
51:32
a broken record we have a long way to go in the fight against HIV
51:37
the virus that causes AIDS the virus that causes AIDS the virus that causes
51:43
AIDS the virus that causes AIDS the virus that causes AIDS the virus that
51:49
causes AIDS then what could be the real
51:54
causes of AIDS there is no question about the reality of people dying but if
51:59
HIV is not the cause what is and what can we do to stop it under the protocol
52:05
of scientific debate dr. Peter Duesberg and the group for reappraising AIDS are not required to solve the problem simply
52:11
because they dispute the HIV hypothesis but they have made some suggestions to
52:16
begin with Duesberg argues that aids is not infectious it is not been spread
52:22
sexually and it is not a threat to the public at large he and journalist John Lorenson have
52:27
proposed that AIDS is caused by recreational drug use and AZT psychoactive drugs used by homosexuals
52:35
as aphrodisiacs and injected drugs like heroin and cocaine they claim are the
52:40
direct cause of AIDS in nine out of ten cases AIDS has come from virtually
52:46
nowhere or from a very low basis up to now currently eighty ninety thousand
52:52
cases per year in this country so here is it is my curved AIDS has gone up in
52:58
the last fourteen 15 years from virtually nothing that used to be called
53:05
that way there was always a low background of these diseases none of the eight diseases is new to up 200,000 in
53:11
93 and now it's topping it down to 80,000 last year but HIV has been
53:16
unchanging 1 million so this could not ever be the cause of this this is going
53:23
up from nowhere 200,000 and this is staying a million for 10 years how can this cause this and if you look at this
53:31
here this shows you how cocaine use and heroin use goes up this is cocaine and
53:37
this is heroin and this is called cane related hospital emergencies you will see that these two match renewal
53:45
and that's what we discussed earlier that's the lifestyle apophysis or the talk hypothesis that recreational talks
53:51
are causing these diseases and they they match perfectly over time they track
53:58
perfectly the talk use the talk use emergencies heroin cocaine in this case and AIDS but not a sharee the
54:07
correlation between AIDS and skyrocketing drug use is astounding and unlike HIV we have a good idea of how
54:15
drugs suppress the immune system well how does smoking cause emphysema
54:20
how does alcoholism cause liver cirrhosis that is something that has been described in the literature it's
54:27
chemistry chemicals have their price you can't expect to take chemical edit doors
54:33
that gets you so high that you don't sleep anymore you don't want to eat anymore and you have ten or twenty six
54:39
partners per night to expect to be totally into consequential for your health if you do so much chemistry put
54:46
you so much chemistry in your body and do it with your body you cannot expect that this has no consequences
54:51
it's like hoping that you contrive an American freeway car designed to go 60
54:58
miles an hour and hundred sixty miles and expect it to one just as long as the
55:03
company has promised it would last though there are no government funded
55:09
studies it examined the long-term effects of drug use in this war on AIDS the medical literature is full of cases
55:15
of AIDS like symptoms among drug addicts since 1909 we've observed the horrendous
55:21
effects of heroin morphine speed cocaine and other injected drugs on the immune
55:27
system today thousands of American junkies who are not infected with HIV
55:32
are losing the same cd4 t-cells and getting the same diseases as AIDS patients how is the war on AIDS
55:40
addressed this issue we've passed out clean needles and told addicts to avoid getting HIV IV drug users comprise over
55:49
32 percent of all US AIDS cases approximately 62% of all the women with
55:55
AIDS are IV drug users and 70% of the babies born with AIDS are born to mothers addicted to drugs but the
56:03
largest risk group is male homosexuals well over half that 60% of all AIDS
56:08
patients are gay men what is causing AIDS and homosexuals and are they all at
56:13
risk here again Peter Duesberg argues that aids is not infectious and is
56:19
really the result of drugs used by many men in the fast track gay lifestyle surveys conducted by the CDC show that
56:27
gays often indulge in a high amount of recreational drug use including many of the drugs known to be immunosuppressive
56:33
in drug addicts but one drug that was available legally nitrite inhalants commonly known as poppers are used
56:40
extensively poppers are believed to be the direct cause of Kaposi's sarcoma a rare form of skin cancer that afflicts
56:48
the nose throat lungs and skin Kaposi sarcoma has been an indicator disease of
56:53
AIDS but it is often found in gay men who are not infected with HIV in the
56:58
study published by Toby Eisenstein rodents showed a mediated dose response in immune suppression after being
57:05
exposed to nitrites found in poppers I think that's very revealing it showed
57:10
that a no nitric oxide radical is terribly immunosuppressive but
57:16
interestingly enough all of the literature on n oh and I follow up on it rather carefully at my computer never
57:23
mentions a molar butyl nitrite never mentions the word poppers it's as almost
57:28
these two worlds are living side by side but they don't are not talking to each other another possible cause of AIDS
57:35
among homosexuals and heterosexuals as well is the infection that occurs during anal sex the tissue lining in the rectum
57:42
is permeable and only one layer thick unlike the vagina which is three layers thick the rectum cannot accommodate the
57:49
abrasive thrusting that takes place during anal sex through the tears in this lining foreign proteins found in
57:55
semen along with viruses and bacteria have a direct route to the blood contamination from feces and bacteria
58:01
have been blamed for what is called gay bowel syndrome or the colon and rectum become inflamed
58:07
accompanied by diarrhea loss of bowel control and malnutrition also foreign
58:13
proteins found in sperm have been shown to be immunosuppressive it's been suggested that when they enter the blood
58:19
they could trigger an autoimmune reaction where the body's immune system turns upon itself small cuts and sores
58:25
on the penis are routes by which infection spreads to the person on the giving end using a condom during anal
58:32
sex can reduce the risk of foreign proteins infecting the blood but often the condom even when it works properly
58:38
still tears the rectal lining and exposes the recipient to chemicals used as lubricants many gay AIDS patients
58:45
have multiple infections of gonorrhea syphilis hepatitis herpes cytomegalovirus
58:51
and other diseases to combat these repeated infections homosexuals often
58:56
take huge amounts of antibiotics during bathhouse visits along with other drugs these antibiotic overdoses also wear
59:04
down the immune system there's no doubt that homosexuals are contracting many of these opportunistic AIDS diseases
59:10
sexually but is this the cause of AIDS or simply put are gays getting AIDS
59:15
because of homosexual behavior or is it caused by drugs used commonly in connection with the gay lifestyle Peter
59:23
Duesberg points out that the number of homosexuals getting AIDS amounts to only a very small percentage of the entire
59:29
gay population so we are talking about a small percentage of the homosexual
59:35
population that is that is sleep that is practicing this lifestyle taking these
59:41
drugs for sex those are the ones were at risk not homosexuals homosexuals again
59:47
as old as mankind is Michelangelo walls Socrates was Tchaikovsky was and they
59:52
all lived without AIDS normalize Duesberg argues that if the war on AIDS
1:00:00
focused upon drugs used in the gay lifestyle instead of HIV we could save
1:00:05
thousands of lives we have 100,000 studies on HIV and AIDS and it isn't one
1:00:12
that is not uno epidemiological study that has shown that a coupe of I go as
1:00:17
low as 10 or 20 in homosexuals heterosexual doesn't matter HIV positive but not using
1:00:24
poppers not using cocaine not using herring and not using AZT ever gets AIDS abrogates
1:00:29
Kaposi sarcoma tuberculosis dementia a diarrhea at the age of 25 or 35 where
1:00:34
these men die when they take the talks and have HIV why is there's no such
1:00:40
study I think the answer is very simple because HIV doesn't do it it's the drugs
1:00:46
that are doing so if recreational drug use can explain 9 out of 10 AIDS cases
1:00:52
among homosexuals and drug addicts what about the other 10% such as people with medical risks like blood transfusion
1:01:00
patients and hemophiliacs the risk in receiving blood is well known and it
1:01:05
should be no surprise that transfusion patients often develop AIDS symptoms because of the life-threatening
1:01:12
conditions that require transfusions almost 50% of all transfusion patients
1:01:17
die within a year after receiving blood and those that survive their immunosuppression directly corresponds
1:01:24
with how much blood they receive the condition of their illness and factors affecting their health regardless of
1:01:29
whether they are infected with HIV hemophiliacs receive injections of blood clotting factor 8 made from thousands of
1:01:37
blood donors before blood was tested for HIV many were infected with the virus and
1:01:42
some developed AIDS yet some of the most revealing contradictions against HIV can
1:01:47
be observed among this special group for years dr. Duesberg has argued that HIV
1:01:52
is not causing aids in hemophiliacs and his research indicates what is foreign proteins found in clotting factor 8 that
1:02:00
can be shown to have a measured dose response towards suppressing immunity in hemophiliacs almost 75 percent of
1:02:06
American hemophiliacs are infected with HIV yet the lifespan of hemophiliacs as
1:02:11
a group has increased by 15 years during the AIDS epidemic so hemophiliacs are living longer than
1:02:17
ever before in history with HIV in fact hemophiliacs with HIV develop AIDS at a
1:02:23
slower rate than IV drug users and homosexuals a recent study conducted by Sarah Darby at Oxford tracked death
1:02:31
rates among British hemophilia between 1977 through 1992 the Darby
1:02:36
study concluded that hiv-infected hemophiliacs were dying at a much faster rate which supports the HIV hypothesis
1:02:43
but under scrutiny that Darby study falls apart the trouble is with the Darby experiment is that they did not
1:02:50
control for the magnitude and amount of foreign proteins that were being
1:02:55
received by these hemophiliacs so it's impossible to determine whether HIV or
1:03:01
foreign proteins in fact 'read are increasing the death rates since HIV
1:03:06
rarely contaminates factor eight those hemophiliacs infected with the virus would have the highest number of
1:03:12
infusions of the factor and should be expected to develop aids faster but the most alarming observation about Darby
1:03:19
study delivers a crowning blow to the HIV hypothesis followed by a frightening realization the data clearly indicates
1:03:26
that the HIV hypothesis itself is causing AIDS look closely at the death
1:03:33
rates even though many hemophiliacs had been infected with HIV for years before it could be detected their mortality
1:03:40
rate remained low but when HIV testing was introduced in 1985 it suddenly
1:03:45
jumped the question is why would someone living with HIV only start to die after
1:03:51
being told they were infected unless the virus is harmless and it can only cause
1:03:57
AIDS when a patient is terrorized by a diagnosis of death and begins taking
1:04:02
deadly antiviral treatments like AZT that could cause AIDS themselves the
1:04:07
Darby study scientifically documents the HIV AIDS formula for mass medical
1:04:12
disaster a failed hypothesis that spawns a misdiagnosis of death and terrorizes
1:04:19
the unwary into taking deadly treatments that cause the theoretical disease a self-fulfilling epitaph HIV causes AIDS
1:04:28
a ziti aids by prescription in 1987 the
1:04:35
war on AIDS took another drastic turn for the worse a ziti a toxic chemotherapy deemed too poisonous for
1:04:42
cancer treatment was approved to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic HIV patients in attempt to kill the virus
1:04:49
that causes AIDS a Z T is a DNA chain terminator a poison designed to randomly
1:04:56
destroy the DNA synthesis of reproducing cells it was initially developed to
1:05:01
treat leukemia victims but after animal testing the FDA determined that it was too toxic for use in human beings and
1:05:08
banded but in 1987 when the AIDS scare hit its height the FDA was pressured
1:05:14
into approving the drug for use for the first time in human beings even for people who were healthy and showed no
1:05:20
sign of AIDS a Z T is highly mutagenic meaning that it destroys the genes and
1:05:26
cells and has been shown to cause cancer in rodents it targets the bone marrow where B lymphocyte blood cells are being
1:05:33
made these are the very cells an AIDS patient needs most for immunity a Z T
1:05:38
destroys randomly bone marrow kidneys liver intestines muscle tissue the brain
1:05:43
and central nervous system Peter Duesberg claims AZT actually causes AIDS
1:05:48
itself ezt deaths does directly causing AIDS defining diseases you know AIDS is a lot
1:05:55
of two things but it doesn't cause Kaposi sarcoma I think but it does cause immunodeficiency it was designed to do
1:06:02
that it was designed to kill human cells in fact the manufacturer says that specifically that it can cause it's like
1:06:10
diseases the manufacturer that is both welcome says it is often difficult to
1:06:15
distinguish adverse events possibly associated with cedarwood in Anza dovey
1:06:22
Dean Administration which is a CT from underlying signs of HIV disease in other
1:06:28
words even they acknowledge not just respect that CDV that AZT causes AIDS or
1:06:34
inste finding diseases in his book poison by prescription journalist John
1:06:40
Lorenson explains how AZ tests conducted by the FDA and Berle's welcome the manufacturer were
1:06:46
scientifically sloppy and outright fraudulent during the experiments patients taking AZT became anemic
1:06:53
suffered low white blood cell counts accompanied by vomiting over half had to
1:06:58
have blood transfusions 20% were transfused several times though both
1:07:03
doctors and patients were not supposed to know who was getting AZT and who was getting the placebo it became obvious
1:07:09
halfway through the test who was on AZT out of fear and desperation many of
1:07:14
those being tested traded drugs the test was terminated early and because of what appeared to be benefits from using AZT
1:07:21
the patients who were taking the placebo were now also given AZT this made
1:07:26
long-term follow-up of AZT toxic effects impossible despite a
1:07:32
warning by FDA toxicology analyst Harvey Chernov that AZT not be approved the FDA
1:07:37
was pressured by AIDS activist organizations to lift the ban and hundreds of thousands of people began
1:07:43
taking AZT even though AZT can not cure AIDS and is only supposed to slow down
1:07:49
the progression but the logic behind AZT treatment is flawed even if one believes
1:07:54
HIV causes AIDS because HIV only infects about one t-cell in 1999 healthy t-cells
1:08:02
must die to kill the one cell that is infected and this can only happen early on before HIV becomes dormant and is
1:08:09
still making DNA yet AIDS patients are given AZT for months on into years
1:08:15
randomly destroying DNA in all parts of t