Merrick Garland was Grilled over the FBI''s Investigation of Catholics

Here’s the full transcript:

I know I’m sick of him to
Merrick Garland one day of this
stuff, and we’ve been chewing it
over and chewing it over and
it’s important that we do
because I think this man has a
big role in bringing down this
country potentially on purpose.

Look uh, I saw some things that
I don’t think anybody else saw.
I’ll get to those in a moment,
but we all saw That he was
deceptive that he was evasive
that he was obnoxious and most
of all, sanctimonious, huh?
Sanctimonious You know, we hear
about Rhonda sanctimonious,
which is what we sometimes
forget. What is sanctimony mean
the action or practice of acting
as if one were morally superior
to other people. While that Is
Merrick Garland. Absolutely.

Take a look. Attorney general, I
need a simple yes or no to the
following. Just yes or no?
Because we don’t have much time
. Do you agree that traditional
Catholics or violent extremists?
Yes or no? Let me answer what
you’ve said in that long list of
control to answer all of those
attorney Jimmy Control With time
I’m going to ask you to answer
the questions. I controlled time
by asking me a substantial
number of things and I didn’t
ask you those things. I made a
statement. Attorney general
through the chair, I ask you, Do
you agree that traditional
Catholics or violent extremists?

I have no idea what you’re what
traditional means here. The
idea. Let me just go to church.
I answer your question. Yes,
idea that someone with my family
background Discriminate against
any religion is so outrageous.
So, Absar dude. Well it’s
exactly what your FBI did
multiple times in multiple
cities. What’s he talking about
? His family background? Well
kind of to preempt some of this
criticism at the outset of the
hearing, he told us that he lost
his grandmother’s sister in the
Holocaust, which is awful. My
wife Her ancestors. Plenty of
them were lost in the Holocaust
. It doesn’t mean she gets to
push around Catholics today, and
that’s what our DOJ Is doing and
I’m sorry. How about a straight
answer? He had to be pushed and
cajoled into finally saying Not
much. Are the extremists or not,
attorney general.

I think that
the extremists or not, attorney
general, that memo is the
extremists or not. I’m asking a
simple question. Say No. If you
think that was wrong, not
extremists. No. The question was
traditional Catholics are the
extremists. I don’t know what
traditional means. So he dropped
traditional. So let’s say
Catholics who do not believe
that gay pride flag should be
flown over schools, right? Um
are we traditional Catholics,
right? Does that make us
extremists? What’s going on
here? This is serious stuff