Reacting to Mr. InBetween Season 1 Episodes 1 and 2

Hey guys, welcome back to my channel! Today, I'm going to be sharing my first impressions and reaction to Mr. InBetween Season 1 Episodes 1 and 2. Wow, right from the start, this show throws us into the intense world of Ray Shoesmith, a highly skilled hitman who also has to juggle his personal life. What really stands out is the incredible performance by Scott Ryan, who not only stars as Ray but also created and wrote the series. His portrayal of this complex and morally ambiguous character is nothing short of brilliant. You can't help but be drawn to his enigmatic presence on screen.

00:00 - Reaction Preview
00:13 - Intro
02:24 - Episode 1 Reaction
13:20 - Episode 2 Reaction
24:53 - Outro

Get your free Audible Book by using our Audible Trial Link below:
https://amzn.to/3pjn5n7

Sign up to Amazon Prime and get your free trial using our Channel's link below:
https://amzn.to/3r1YHXC

It costs you nothing extra to use these links and it helps to support the channel at the same time:

Episode 1 is titled 'The Pee Pee Guy' and scores 7.6/10 on IMDB. Episode 2 is titled 'Unicorns Know Everybody's Name'.

These episodes were written by Scott Ryan. These episodes were directed by Nash Edgerton. These episodes star Scott Ryan, Damon Herriman and Brooke Satchwell amongst others. Please visit https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7493662/?ref_=ttep_ep1 for the full cast list. This series was produced by FX, Screen Australia, Create NSW, BlueTongue Films and Jungle Entertainment Production. The copyright to the full original content is held by Disney/FX.

The copyright for this video is held by Jay's Retro Reacts.

Legal and Copyright Contract: By clicking on, reviewing or making a copyright claim on this video you agree to all of the below terms and conditions and to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Ireland to resolve any copyright claims and/or disputes in relation to this video. You also agree that this contract will supersede any other agreement, past, present or future in relation to this video. Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author. The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part. Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. As per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video is for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody and falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be required: - Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights - Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above - Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video - Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video - Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders will be reported to the police as attempted fraud! If you make a false copyright claim under law, a copyright claim that is not compatible with the law such as fair dealing or fair usage and/or a false claim by misrepresentation you agree that you will reimburse the owner of this video to the tune of EUR 250,000 and that your costs and claims will be limited to the amount of revenue earned by this video.