Premium Only Content
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07bdf/07bdf86b0071ab84baa0cf5fb0a90e7290541739" alt="Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed"
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
Ben Stein shows us a world where Academia's freedom of inquiry might not be so free. This should be a concern for anyone and everyone. This undermines the concept that we will be teaching facts and truth in our universities. However, if you watch how this documentary is formatted you will find that this documentary is overly biased, delving into spectrums of propaganda! Let me explain. Stein sets about proving his premise by interviewing scientists that have been rejected by the establishment. Scientists who have allegedly had their lives ruined because of their belief in something called "Intelligent Design." Science isn't here to persecute people's beliefs and this concept would probably outrage anyone... that is until you realize the lengths he goes to paint science as the root of this evil.
So, we have Stein interviewing scientists that have had their qualifications ruined by the establishment, wouldn't you think Stein should interview people working in the scientific community at the time about this issue? If this persecution of dissidents was happening I would think he'd go and talk to people still working in the field and cite his examples for scrutiny. This never happens. Either Stein is a just a terrible host for a documentary and should stick to the game shows, or he has an agenda. Stein does interview PZ Myers, Michael Ruse, Eugenie Scott, and the mighty Richard Dawkins for his grand finale, but he never once asks them about the people that were fired or denied tenure. He only sticks to questions concerning how life began.
He doesn't even really talk to them about why Intelligent Design is rejected by the scientific community versus why evolution is taught. He never asks these questions. Michael Ruse, who isn't even credited during his interview (more sloppy documentary work), proposes a possible life beginning scenario involving crystals. This results in Stein asking him again how it's possible... after Ruse just told him and results in what can be interpreted as a rude response from Ruse. This style of filming to show scientists as unwilling to entertain the idea of Intelligent Design pushes the viewer to see science as intolerable.
Source: https://youtu.be/V5EPymcWp-g
-
19:37
Biological Medicine
7 hours agoSATURN X! ELON MUSK'S "A.I. BEAST GROK" LOGO PROVES THAT HE WORSHIPS SATAN AND THE ANTICHRIST!
442 -
Jeff Ahern
2 hours agoFriday Freak out with Jeff Ahern (Chainsawing DEI)
4.67K -
46:31
PMG
13 hours agoHannah Faulkner and Mary Flynn | REVIVING THE AMERICAN DREAM - GROWING UP A FLYNN
2.35K1 -
3:01
Kirill MultitoolOfficial
1 day ago $5.36 earnedSurvival skills and Bushcraft HACKS in the forest!
30.6K5 -
11:52
Dr. Nick Zyrowski
12 hours agoWhat Can I Eat On The Carnivore Diet? | Detailed Guide
30K8 -
16:23
TSPLY
21 hours agoNew CNN / MSNBC Meltdown Moments Of Getting Mad At Donald Trump And Elon Musk
21K20 -
30:54
Cooking with Gruel
20 hours agoCooking with Matt and Ginger Gaetz
21.2K5 -
1:22:55
MTNTOUGH Fitness Lab
22 hours agoHomeland Security Pulls Us Off The Plane! Jaw-Dropping Moments from MTNTOUGH's 2024 Ibex Hunt
47.3K2 -
1:05:30
Kyle Rittenhouse Presents: Tactically Inappropriate
17 hours ago $1.06 earnedHey Doge, Where's My Coin?
22.8K3 -
4:44
America First Policy Institute
1 day agoAmerica First Unfiltered: Trump’s Historic First Month – Real Wins for Real Americans! 🇺🇸 #news
26.2K2