Brains on Trial: Neuroscience and Law
140816 Like and subscribe. This is an archive, check the link in the end if you are owner. What if we could peer into a brain and see guilt or innocence? Brain scanning technology is trying to break its way into the courtroom, but can we—and should we—determine criminal fate based on high-tech images of the brain? Join a distinguished group of neuroscientists and legal experts who will debate how and if neuroscience should inform our laws and how we treat criminals.
The World Science Festival gathers great minds in science and the arts to produce live and digital content that allows a broad general audience to engage with scientific discoveries. Our mission is to cultivate a general public informed by science, inspired by its wonder, convinced of its value, and prepared to engage with its implications for the future.
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel for all the latest from WSF.
Visit our Website: http://www.worldsciencefestival.com/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/worldsciencefestival
Follow us on twitter: https://twitter.com/WorldSciFest
Original program date: June 1, 2013
MODERATOR: Alan Alda
PARTICIPANTS: Anthony D. Wagner, Jay N. Giedd, Nita A. Farahany, Jed S. Rakoff, Kent Kiehl
Alan Alda's Introduction 00:00
Participant Introductions 2:05
Brain imaging that can read your mind. 04:11
Can we trust what technology is telling us? 6:23
Can the brain imaging tell the difference between reality and imagination? 12:15
When does this information come into the courtroom? 14:43
fMRI and what it does. 18:22
Information bias and technology. 24:41
Printing images of your thoughts. 36:19
Teaching a computer the brain patterns to know it all. 39:30
Jed S. Rakoff, Kent Kiehl and Jay N. Giedd join the conversation. 46:21
Studding the adolescent brain. 48:13
How much is age a factor in sentencing? 53:25
Should we introduce mandatory brain scanning into criminal sentencing? 57:19
The influence of peer pressure on decision making. 1:02:50
Creating a mobile scanning unit for prisons. 1:08:45
If the presents of others in decision making is dangerous, how does a prison atmosphere effect the danger? 1:15:12
If someone is a psychopath should they just be given longer sentence? 1:22:25
What are the goals for the future of brain scanning and the legal system? 1:27:11
https://rumblevideoarchive.wordpress.com/
-
56:28
LuckyLukevsDaltons
1 year agoNeurotechnology and The Law
21 -
1:34
Bannons War Room
2 years agoNeural Link Moving Towards Human Trials
4.3K -
9:39
InnerLight
1 year agoNuremberg Trials: The ‘Doctor's Trial’ - The repsonsibility for medical experiments upon living human subjects, without their consent
4812 -
30:27
Esoteric Learning
5 months agoReady for Brain Transparency? Neurotechnology - The Battle for Your Brain
39 -
1:33
Newsy
6 years agoNeuroforensics Is Turning Our Brains Into Legal Evidence
-
1:11:08
Free Your Mind Videos
1 year agoBrain Science from Bench to Battlefield: The Realities, and Risks of Neuroweapons - 2017
278 -
2:06:27
OP Freedom
1 year agoStrawman - The Nature Of The Cage - What You Perceive As Legal, Does Not Always Mean It's Law
2.03K6 -
1:11:08
RAVries
10 months agoBrain Science from Bench to Battlefield - The Realities – and Risks – of Neuroweapons | CGSR Seminar • by Dr. James Giordano
812 -
1:00:00
PMJMP
8 months agoFreedom Enough 039_Involuntary Human Medical Experimentation - Fraudulently Marketed by Judge
208 -
21:24
freedomvibeart
1 year agoThe Ross Ulbricht Case - A Natural Law Perspective
18