Measuring the Mandates 4. Lockdowns
9 months ago
123
The consequences of lockdowns were as brutal as they were predictable. The United Nations warned of ‘multiple famines of biblical proportions’, that would kill ‘hundreds of thousands of children’, whilst Oxfam cautioned that ‘the economic crisis is potentially going to be even more severe than the health crisis’, moving half a billion people into poverty.
How could this be justified? Only through the claim that lockdowns would save more lives than they cost. Absent evidence, this is simply a gamble, so was it a gamble that paid off?
Read the full report at:
https://www.deepstateconsciousness.com/measuring-the-mandates
Loading comments...
-
6:46
Thefederalistfiles
3 years ago $0.01 earnedInternational Study Shows Lockdowns Had Little to No Impact On Case Rate
611 -
9:42
DeepStateConsciousness
8 months agoMeasuring the Mandates 7. Conclusion
157 -
1:49
Bannons War Room
2 years agoExtreme Lockdowns Imposed On ‘Anticipated Risk’
8.35K48 -
2:45
alexlunaviewer
1 year ago100 Million Additional People Descended into Poverty Because of the Impact of Lockdowns
162 -
0:44
The Ike Wingate Show
10 months agoMore Covid Lockdowns Coming? #Mandate #Lockdown #Control #DoNotComply
16 -
1:08
Alice Springs To Mind
10 months agoWill You Agree to More Lockdowns and Mandates?
821 -
17:24
Dr. John Campbell
1 year agoLockdowns, a global policy failure
18.2K124 -
17:24
FlatEarther46
1 year agoLockdowns, a policy failure
466 -
7:56
NewsWagg
1 year agoEach day we see how damaging the lockdowns were to people
2 -
1:49:37
NationalCitizensInquiryCA
9 months agoLive with the NCI - Mandates and Lockdowns: Effects on our Children - Never Again
5.27K27