Newt Gingrich on Seth Rich:

Newt Gingrich as the mainstream media was focused on Clinton's bought and paid for Russia collusion hoax:
"We have this very strange story. Of this young man who worked for the Democratic national committee. Who apparently was assassinated at four in the morning. Having giving Wikileaks something like 53 emails. Nobody is investigating that. It turns out it wasn't the Russians. It was this young guy who i suspect was disgusted by the corruption of the Democratic National committee."

Investigators went on to say he was killed by a "debauched robbery" and CNN went on to claim that there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever that he was the source. I'm sorry but how is Assange basically winking at people telling them that Seth was the source but he can't tell you not circumstantial evidence?