Is Lucy Letby innocent? (LO or LD - Long Day) #lucyletby

Is Lucy Letby innocent? (LO or LD - Long Day) #lucyletby

The police have stated that Lucy Letby used a secret code LO when she was on duty and this they say points to her guilt, yet nurses have stated this is in fact LD for Long Day and that most nurses do this.

Was this used as evidence in court?

See: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12435997/Lucy-Letby-used-secret-code-diary.html

The article has this: 'We knew she was a copious writer of notes,' DI Woods said. 'Now we thought that perhaps having been arrested she might stop doing that.

My point being that someone who is guilty would have stopped making notes. It is in my opinion not the actions of someone guilty to keep making notes.

In the article they refer to her notes as evidence of guilt.

Start of article -

On the green Post-it, found inside the diary in her bedroom, she wrote: 'I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough. I will never have children or marry or know what it's like to have a family.'

She insisted that the green note was not evidence that she had killed and harmed the children, but that she had written it when she was 'struggling' mentally because she thought she could have made mistakes at work and had accidentally hurt the babies.

End of article -

Considering these were written as she was being investigated, in a state of stress. Where she was on medication. It would I would suggest reasonable for her to question if she had done wrong. This seems to be the actions of somone who is not guilty.

I would also suggest that as she was young that it would be unlikely that she would have at the time of the deaths had thoughts that she may not have got married. But when she wrote these notes she was suffering extreme depression because she was being investigated.

These notes also contradict the belief she killed to show off to a doctor or for attention.

But we must make note that DI Woods has stated that he or she would have expected her to have stopped making notes but she carried on. I would suggest that we could take from that statement that DI Woods would have expected a guilty person to have stopped, but she carried on making notes. In other words one could suggest she has not acted how a guilty person would act. In other words she has acted like somone not guilty.

To be clear I am not saying Lucy Letby is guilty or not guilty. I am saying the evidence that I have seen shows a few coincidences and interpretations of what has happened.

Indeed if true she in fact wrote LD for Long Day and not some LO code, then questions perhaps should be asked about the police investigation and what had been used as evidence.