Manuscript review guidelines | Address Reviewer Comments | Respond to reviewer
9 months ago
1
Unrealistic target journals, poor paper construction, poor research design, lack of novelty, irrelevant clinical research, unrealistic time-frames, improper English, plagiarism--these are some of the many aspects of writing that you must steer clear if you want your manuscript to be selected.
Loading comments...
-
4:44
WeKinnectGlobal
1 year agoHow to Respond to Reviews
1 -
50:23
RockManLP (Reviews & More)
3 years agoWho Responds To Who Reviews The Reviewers? (Round 5) Podcast
18 -
59:47
RockManLP (Reviews & More)
3 years agoWho Responds To Who Reviews The Reviewers? (Round 4) Podcast
10 -
49:19
RockManLP (Reviews & More)
3 years agoWho Responds To Who Reviews The Reviewers? (Round 1) Podcast
17 -
1:46:05
RockManLP (Reviews & More)
3 years agoWho Responds To Who Reviews The Reviewers? (Round 3) Podcast
47 -
1:48:44
RockManLP (Reviews & More)
3 years agoWho Responds To Who Reviews The Reviewers? (Round 6) Podcast
16 -
31:22
LUMOSHROOM
11 months agoResponding to Your Comments
15 -
4:44
WeKinnectGlobal
1 year agoHow to Respond to Reviews
1 -
1:03
BUSINESS
5 months agoA Comprehensive Review of MOOSEND
1 -
14:25
Due Dissidence
5 months agoMailbag: RESPONDING to Viewer Comments on Our 'DINK' Segment
3.1K12