Premium Only Content
Should you purge unresponsive emails from your list?
A while ago I got an email to this general effect: “we notice you haven’t been responding. We won’t email you as often from now on.”
Is that the right thing to do?
I’ve seen other efforts like this that give you a chance to re-engage before the sender takes you off their list. The reasoning behind such a campaign is the sender risks a negative impact on sender score by continuing to email unresponsive addresses. Some of them might even end up as spam traps.
I started a conversation on LinkedIn about this, and asked my friend Jeanne Jennings from Email Optimization Shop what she thought. She pulled in a couple of her friends from Only Influencers, a community of email marketing professionals, and it started a very interesting discussion, which I’ll summarize briefly here.
Jeanne doesn’t recommend purging these names because an email’s effect goes beyond what you can measure by opens and clicks. For one thing, if the recipient views the email with images off, the sender’s ESP won’t register the open anyway. And even if the recipient only sees the subject line, preheader text and preview pane, the sender might get the point across and drive sales.
Jeanne’s comment reminds me of the effect of online ads. Hardly anyone clicks on them, but just seeing the ad has an effect.
Samantha Iodice of The Sauce Experience added, “Not opening does not equal unengaged,” and Dela Quist of AlchemyWorx offered some infographics to that effect. Samantha recommends overlaying purchase data with non-openers, and segmenting them out to try different methods to re-engage them. Comparing engagement with purchase history sounds like a very good idea.
Jeff Mungo of Data Axle took the other side, saying the sender risks a hit on sender score the longer the sender keeps unengaged people on the list. He recommends one best, last-ditch effort to people who haven’t engaged in 6 or 12 months, and then to take them off.
What interests me about this discussion is that even among competent, data-driven professionals with lots of experience, you won’t always get one answer. As Thomas Sowell says, “there are no solutions, only trade-offs.”
You can’t run a business waiting for a perfect solution. You need to understand the risks of different strategies and then use your best judgment and take your chances.
Resources
-
LIVE
Ellie_roe
2 hours agoEllie and Errys Halloween Spooktacular || Random Horror Games
55 watching -
50:27
Sarah Westall
3 hours agoBig Banks Caught Rigging Market, IMF tells World to “Buckle Up” w/ Andy Schectman
2.5K -
13:54
Degenerate Jay
10 hours ago5 Best Superhero Movies To Watch On Halloween
75 -
59:03
NAG Podcast
3 hours agoSarah Fields: BOLDTALK W/Angela Belcamino
901 -
1:21:41
Glenn Greenwald
6 hours agoGlenn Takes Your Questions: On the Argentina Bailout, Money in Politics, and More | SYSTEM UPDATE #541
51.6K33 -
3:10:08
Barry Cunningham
3 hours agoPRESIDENT TRUMP TO USE NUCLEAR OPTION? FOOD STAMPS END! | SHUTDOWN DAY 31
18.6K18 -
1:06:56
BonginoReport
11 hours agoThe Battle Between Good & Evil w/ Demonologist Rick Hansen - Hayley Caronia (Ep.168)
77.8K27 -
1:12:57
Kim Iversen
5 hours agoBill Gates Suddenly Says “Don’t Worry About Climate Change”?
73.2K48 -
1:05:12
Michael Franzese
6 hours agoI Waited 50 Years to Tell You What Happened on Halloween 1975
29.3K11 -
1:07:15
Candace Show Podcast
6 hours agoINFILTRATION: Charlie Kirk Was Being Tracked For Years. | Candace Ep 256
71.7K265