THE VOICE #4: Albanese backtracking on the Uluru Statement & his risky, divisive, race-based agenda.

Last night Peta Credlin dismantled Anthony Albanese's backtracking on the Uluru Statement and what it reveals about his risky, divisive, race-based Voice agenda.
You and I know the full Uluru Statement is many pages long. However, ignoring Albanese's obvious attempts to mislead Aussies, his explanation only serves to confirm the information in these documents is true.
According to Anthony Albanese the shocking Uluru documents revealed through FOI and confirmed to be in the Government's 2017 Referendum Report, are not an extended version of the Uluru statement.
He says we should ignore the authors who have said that it was an extended statement, we should ignore the NIAA who originally said it was an extended statement and we should ignore the 2017 referendum report that still says it is an extended Uluru statement.
Albanese says we should stop calling it the full Uluru statement and start calling it the Uluru Statement explanation.
Fine, I'm saying call it whatever you want, just make sure you read it.
Because unlike Anthony Albanese, I want you to read all the background and all the official explanation documents that exist because I want you to be informed.
Here is the link to the referendum report. Page 16 is where Albanese's official explanation of the Uluru statement begins, under the note that says "The shaded sections of text in the following pages are extracts from the Uluru Statement from the Heart."
Source (pg. 16-32)
And here are some select quotes directly from Albanese's official Uluru Statement explanation.
***
The following analysis of the three propositions that subsequently emerged in the Uluru Statement of the Heart was presented to the National Constitutional Convention and approved.
Voice to Parliament
• Any Voice to Parliament should be designed so that it could support and promote a treaty-making process.
• Any body must also be supported by a sufficient and guaranteed budget, with access to its own independent secretariat, experts and lawyers. It was also suggested that the body could represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples internationally.
Treaty
• Treaty would be the vehicle to achieve self-determination, autonomy and self-government.
• Treaty could include a proper say in decision-making, the establishment of a truth commission, reparations, a settlement, the resolution of land, water and resources issues, recognition of authority and customary law.
• In relation to enforcement, the issues raised were about the legal force the Treaty should have.
Truth-telling
• The Dialogues emphasised that the true history of colonisation must be told: the genocides, the massacres, the wars.
• A truth commission could be established as part of any reform, for example, prior to a constitutional reform or as part of a Treaty negotiation.
***
When you read the Uluru Statement explanation you will find it is full of demands for treaty, reparations, separatism, and punishments enforceable by law.
These are not my words, these are the words of the Government's own Referendum Report, their official explanation of the Uluru Statement and what they intend to do with Albanese's race-based Voice.