22nd session. 7-30-23. PARADIGM SHIFT FROM SATAN-JUDICIAL TO LOGOS-EDUCATIONAL

IF YOU LIKE THE CLASS, FEEL FREE TO SHARE IT.
CORRECTIONS TO MY STATEMENTS AT THE 7-30-23 CLASS
>> At about 1:02:36 I stated that Micah was a contemporary of Isaiah. Actually the book of Isaiah is an anthology in three parts. Micah was a contemporary of the prophet Isaiah who gave us the first part. The verses we had just read, from Isaiah 55, are from the second part and were written by a prophet who lived over a hundred years after Micah and the author of “First Isaiah.”
>> What I meant to say with regards to slavery and the judicial paradigm should have been obvious, but I will clarify it here. 27:50 to 28:06 was meant to be “Slavery was the expression of the attitude that the people who were enslaved were not worthy of love and help and education and protection.” 28:15 to 28:33 was meant to be “Slavery was a case where the people who were enslaving others believed that the people being enslaved were not worthy of love, help, education, and protection ….” On the same topic, the earlier references to “Europeans” should have been “Europeans and their descendants in the Americas” and “African-Americans” should have been “Africans and their descendants.”
>> Throughout this lecture, for the sake of simplicity, I use the name of the book “Leviticus” as a substitute the “the priestly content of the Tanakh.” In fact the same sort of priestly content that we find at Leviticus 1-7 shows up in other parts of the Tanakh, and parts of Leviticus (especially parts of chapter 19) are very elevated spiritually.