Supreme Court 6-3 Decision Challenges Prohibited Person List

A 6-3 Supreme Court decision has challenged aspects of the prohibited person list, citing NYSRPA v. Bruen. What aspect of the prohibited persons list was challenged, and more importantly, was it successful? Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss the challenge, applications of the NYSRPA v. Bruen one-step test, and 2A implications going forward.

Further your education and firearms passion.
Learn more at Sonoran Desert Institute: https://www.sdi.edu/armed-attorneys/

Support Our 2A Community:

YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join

Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys

Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/

Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys
Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys
#2A
#ArmedAttorneys
#SelfDefense

General Information Only
The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney.

All Rights Reserved
This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.