PDP - Ep155 - Debunking Myths: Common Misconceptions about Protection Dogs

I. Myth #1: Bite and Hold vs Retargeting:
- Explain the misconception surrounding the Bite and Hold technique versus Retargeting
- Clarify the differences between the two approaches and their respective purposes in protection training
- Discuss the benefits of Retargeting, including increased control, adaptability, and safety during encounters

II. Myth #2: Deep Bite vs Canine Bite:
- Address the misconception regarding the difference between a Deep Bite and a Canine Bite
- Explain that a Deep Bite is not inherently more effective or desirable in protection dogs
- Highlight the importance of training for a balanced, controlled, and appropriately targeted bite

III. Myth #3: Driving into the Bite vs Thrashing and Pulling:
- Debunk the misconception surrounding the techniques of Driving into the Bite versus Thrashing and Pulling
- Explain that protection dogs should not solely rely on brute force but rather use strategic and controlled movements during encounters
- Discuss the importance of balance, timing, and proper training methods to achieve effective defense and control

IV. Myth #4: Training a Dog to Target vs Allowing Dynamic Interaction:
- Address the misconception that training a dog to target equates to eliminating dynamic interaction and decision-making
- Explain the importance of training a protection dog to make independent decisions while still following command cues
- Emphasize the need for a balanced approach that combines target training with the dog's natural instincts and ability to assess situations