Understanding 9/11 for dummies

1 year ago
630

Ever since September 11, 2001 people have been outsourcing their thinking.

Listen to what Professor Morgan Reynolds' 2009 Qui-Tam case was about.

Discussing air pressure, drag, aerodynamics and then let’s also look at the fraudulent NIST aeroplane impact report as well as the planted aeroplane fuselage and debris at the WTC complex…

And by the end of the video, SAIC and their “specialisation in impacts and explosions” and you’ll see they gave NIST fraudulent impact reports pertaining to the “planes” that supposedly hit the towers.

People also seem to struggle wrapping their brains around what the buildings were built with and that there is no way in hell, aluminium can cut through steel, like a hot knife through butter... Just exactly what did those "planes" have to go through?

Anyone that believes jet fuel, explosives, thermite, buried nukes, mini nukes were used, most probably also still believe in fairies, unicorns and santa claus. Open up your mind, LOOK at what is being presented to you in this video and be sure to put on your thinking cap, because a large proportion of people have fallen for the trap of the cover up, believing that the 9/11 "truther" movement are actually looking to expose the truth of WHAT happened to 8 buildings with a WTC prefix on September 11, 2001 - Americans, WAKE THE FUCK UP!

Ask yourself the question, WHAT are all the 9/11 "truther" talking heads really doing, whilst asking for donations and talking absolute bullshit?

Why, after nearly 22 years, do we still have such a strong cover-up with regards to the events of September 11, 2001?

Why does the 9/11 "truther" movement and Wikipedia not want you to know about the 2009 US Supreme Court Qui-Tam cases?

Top 5 Facts About September 11th, 2001 - Look into the work of Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson and STOP outsourcing your thinking to the psy-op, that is the 9/11 "truther" movement.

Loading comments...