Rise

1 year ago
40

Made in 2005, the viral success of this video forced me to put together a better thought out, simplified argument against the official narrative. In person my argument would be-

"The matter on the top of building 7 reached free fall velocity of 9.8 m/s2 en route to the ground, right? Everyone agrees on that fact including the NIST. OK, so if I threw you off the top of a similar building, would you reach free fall velocity of 9.8 m/s2 on the way down? No. You would reach terminal velocity due to the atmosphere. You’ve probably heard it called wind resistance, but it keeps anything falling on this planet from reaching free fall velocity, which is only possible in a vacuum..

Now, what could have replaced thousands of tons of structural steel, concrete, office furniture, coffee mugs, and more copy paper than any of us could ever dream of owning, with a total vacuum* in building 7? Not debris or a fire on 2 floors and most definitely not a gas tank** in the building. So, the official narrative is crap. What else we got? "

Course, in the flic I had to do that without writing words or talking. This video has words, Blasted Reality just has videos from that day.

*Even if you were to sever every supporting connection in the building, like teleport every seam of every weld and all the bolts, rivets, etc in the building at once into space and render all of the concrete to dust, the topmost materials would still not reach 9.8 m/s2 on the way down.

**Diesel is a hydrocarbon which means it requires oxygen to burn which limits the energy release to its surface area. This slow energy release would actually increase the air pressure within the building. In order to create a vacuum within the building one would need an explosive (Material which has oxygen bonded at the molecular level). It’s simple physics. Newtonian even.

Loading comments...