My Terrifying First Watch of 28 Days Later: Zombie Madness

In this video, I am watching "28 Days Later" (2002) for the first time and giving you my raw and honest reaction. This horror film directed by Danny Boyle is a must-watch classic for any horror movie fans out there.

Welcome to my channel where I share my first-time reactions to popular movies!

If you would like to support my channel, you can become a channel member by clicking the below link and gain access to benefits such as:

• Early Access to all of my reactions
• Full Length Reactions
• Exclusive Reactions

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLRQgBGa-mtnGPnVU1SF1kA/join

The movie takes place in London, which adds to the thrill of the storyline. Throughout the film, the characters are faced with terrifying situations, and the tension builds up to an epic conclusion. I was on the edge of my seat, unable to take my eyes off the screen. Join me as I discover all the terrifying moments in this unforgettable movie.

Overall, "28 Days Later" is a fantastic horror movie that is sure to leave you feeling terrified.

Watch my first-time reaction to this film and leave a comment below on your thoughts about the movie as well! Don't forget to like the video and subscribe to my channel for more exciting content.

28 Days Later was written by Alex Garland

28 Days Later was directed by Danny Boyle

28 Days Later stars, amongst others, Cillian Muprhy, Brendan Gleeson, Naomie Harris, Christopher Eccleston. For the full cast list please visit https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0289043/

28 Days Later was Produced by Film Council (UK), European Regional Development Fund.

28 Days Later Copyright is held exclusively by DNA Films Limited

Legal and Copyright Contract: By clicking on, reviewing or making a copyright claim on this video you agree to all of the below terms and conditions and to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Ireland to resolve any copyright claims and/or disputes in relation to this video. You also agree that this contract will supersede any other agreement, past, present or future in relation to this video. Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author. The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part. Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. As per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video is for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody and falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be required: - Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights - Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above - Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video - Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video - Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders will be reported to the police as attempted fraud! If you make a false copyright claim under law, a copyright claim that is not compatible with the law such as fair dealing or fair usage and/or a false claim by misrepresentation you agree that you will reimburse the owner of this video to the tune of EUR 250,000 and that your costs and claims will be limited to the amount of revenue earned by this video.