Left Wing Liberals vs. Right Wing Conservative All Have Same Agenda Its Corruption

Left Wing vs. Right Wing All Have Same Agenda Its For Corruption In The U.S.A. and the fundamental differences between left-wing and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the government. Left-wing beliefs are liberal in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the government. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.Show more

Examples of an expanded role for the government include entitlement programs such as social security and Medicare, Medicaid, universal healthcare, food stamps, free public education, unemployment benefits, strong environmental laws, and other regulations on industries. Right wing ideology would favor market-based solutions to the issues that these government programs aim to tackle. For example, encouraging a freer marketplace for healthcare, driven by consumer choice to drive down costs. Or privately held retirement accounts like 401(k) plans instead of government-guaranteed Social Security.

Origins in France
The political terms left wing and right wing originated in the 18th century during the French Revolution. They are based on the seating arrangements in the French National Assembly — those who sat on the left of the chair of the parliamentary president supported the revolution and a secular republic, and opposed the monarchy of the old regime. The people on the left were in favor of radical change, socialism and republicanism i.e. a strong French republic instead of the monarchy.

Those who sat to the right supported the institutions of the monarchist old regime or Ancien Régime. The stronger your opposition to radical change and desire to preserve traditional society, the more you were to the right. Tradition, institutional religion and privatization of economy were considered the core values of the right-wing.

Social Policies
A variety of social issues in the U.S. divide the left and right. These include abortion, the death penalty, drug policy, gay rights, women's rights, separation of church and state, gun rights, and healthcare policy. In general, the left wing philosophy believes in "one for all and all for one," looking to the government to support those who cannot support themselves. The right wing, on the other hand believes supporting individuals in need is not the most efficient way to optimize government resources, and relies on the private sector and charitable institutions for the same.

Abortion
The left wing generally supports abortion rights, but does not outwardly and necessarily believe that abortion is a good thing. Those on the right, largely due to religious beliefs, would like to see Roe v. Wade overturned to make abortions illegal. Some majority-right states have enacted legislation recently that would make it harder for women to attain abortions while not outlawing it entirely.

The right wing believes that a fetus is a living person and that abortion is, therefore, murder. Some people make an exception for cases involving rape and incest, but some do not.

Left-wingers believe that women should have control over their bodies and that outlawing abortion infringes on women's reproductive rights. Some also claim that making abortions illegal will only force them underground, resulting in untrained, non-physicians performing botched abortions and risking women's lives. Some other arguments by the pro-life and pro-choice factions are described here.

Related issues
Some issues are closely related to abortion rights, including:

Embryonic stem cell research: People on the left support embryonic stem-cell research, which involves the creation, usage and destruction of human embryos, believing that the research has the potential to save and improve lives, and cure many diseases. People on the right are horrified by what they believe is the taking of a human life.

Religious rights of pharmacists: The right wing believes that emergency contraceptive pills — commonly called "morning-after pills" — are similar to having an abortion. So pharmacists who oppose abortions on religious or moral grounds should be allowed to not dispense such pills. The left wing believes that pharmacists are healthcare workers who should be required by law to dispense any medication that a patient has a prescription for.

Contraception mandate in health insurance: One of the provisions of Affordable Care Act (a.k.a Obamacare) was the mandate that all health insurance plans must cover contraception. With strong opposition from the right wing, especially the Catholic church, some exceptions for religious institutions were made.

The Death Penalty
Many on the left believe that the death penalty is barbaric and does not deter crime. Meanwhile, the right generally believes that certain crimes deserve death as a punishment, somewhat akin to the "an eye for an eye" doctrine. A debate over the fairness of the criminal justice system has emerged, with the left asserting that many on death row may be innocent.

Opponents of the death penalty cite the following reasons for their position:

Several people on death row were innocent and have been exonerated. The justice system is not perfect and it would be wrong to kill an innocent person.
It is inhuman to take a life, even that of a murderer.

Minorities and poor people are given the death penalty in disproportionately larger numbers, so criminals with means can escape death row. It's not so much about how heinous the crime is but how much the defendant can afford to spend on lawyers.
Proponents believe that:

The death penalty is an effective deterrent against crimes, especially crimes of a heinous nature.
The death penalty is an appropriate punishment for perpetrators of heinous crimes. The alternative — life in prison — would only mean spending taxpayer dollars to keep them confined, fed and provide healthcare services to them.

Victims and their families deserve justice; often they can only get closure when the perpetrator is put to death.
Gay Rights
Almost without exception, those on the left support gay marriage, and other gay rights issues like adoption rights and non-discrimination at work or in business.

Most on the right believe marriage is strictly an institution based on the union of a man and a woman, and see gay unions as an aberration from the norm. People on the right also advocate for the right of employers (especially religious institutions, including Catholic hospitals) to choose not to employ gay individuals.

Another issue of divergence on gay rights is businesses choosing their customers. For example, a florist in Washington state refused to do the flower arrangement for a gay wedding. She was sued for discrimination. In a situation like this, people on the right generally support the business owner while those on the left support the customers.

Religion
Some people on the political right believe that religious doctrine, such as the 10 Commandments, should play a role in government. Some on the right have sought to have such Christian documents enshrined near government buildings, as according to them, the government should abide by the Bible when it comes to social issues like abortion and gay marriage.

A significant portion on the left identify themselves as atheist or agnostic. Regardless of their religious beliefs, people on the left strongly believe in a secular government and the separation of church and state.

Gun Rights
While some on the right are moving from strongly and wholly supporting the Second Amendment to accepting a ban on assault weapons, many still stand firmly in support of the right to bear arms. Their argument is that guns don't kill people; people kill people, and every citizen should retain the right to defend himself. The right to bear arms is enshrined in the U.S. constitution, and any attempt to regulate gun sales infringes on this right.

The left is in favor of restricting gun ownership altogether, or at least banning automatic or assault weapons. This video with its black humor is the left's take on the issue of gun control.

Morality
University of Virginia psychology professor Jonathan Haidt has studied moral values of people on different parts of the political spectrum.

Media
It used to be that the right wing had a very strong talk-radio presence, while the left had a strong presence in print media. In recent years, media outlets have formed to appease either the left or right wings. Right-wing media includes Fox News, the Wall Street Journal and Rush Limbaugh. Left-wing media includes MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Ed Schultz and comedians like Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart.

Politicians
While many on the left will vote exclusively for Democrats and those on the right will vote for Republicans, many do so only because there are no other choices. Many on the far-right or far-left would prefer politicians who represent the most extreme respective political philosophy, i.e., full drug legalization, or the banning of all taxes.

Some notable far left figures include Ralph Nader and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, and on the right former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.

Self Identification
In general, the right wing outnumbers the left in the U.S. According to recent polls, only 23 percent of Americans identify themselves as being on the left, while 38 percent identify as “conservative,” or members of the right wing. Even so, 23 percent is the highest number self-identifying as being on the left at any time since 1992.

Demographics
Those who would typically identify as being on the right tend to live in rural areas and suburbs, especially in the south, Midwest, and extreme rural west. Meanwhile, those on the left tend to inhabit medium and large cities, and live along either the east or west coast.

Those on the left also tend to be young, and many tend to be of a minority population, including women. Those who identify as being on the right tend to be older, most often Caucasian, and mostly male.

The main differences between the left and right ideologies center around the rights of individuals and the role of the government.

The terms liberal and conservative are used in the definition of the supported guidelines.

The left believes that society is better off when a government has a greater role, guaranteeing rights and promoting equality among all.

In turn, right-wing people believe that society progresses when individual rights and civil liberties take priority, and government power is minimized.

Let us now see the differences between liberal and conservative. While liberals have a more progressive view and in favor of change, conservatives have a more traditional view of the existing social order.

It is necessary to emphasize that the concepts right, left, liberal and conservative have changed a lot since its creation and that today the line between them is very tenuous. However, for the sake of comparison, we will focus on the guidelines that most resemble each of these political ideologies.

What is the Left?
Left-wing ideology holds that the government must guarantee the good of its citizens. For that, it must be big and strong, controlling all sectors of society, regulating companies and collecting taxes.

His ideas are inspired by socialism and communism.

What is the Right?
Ideology advocates less government participation in society, allowing the market itself to dictate its rules.

The right defends a greater individual responsibility of the people and autonomy of the companies, with less taxes and regulation.

Its theoretical basis comes from liberalism.

Main differences
The left believes that there must be an adequate tax payment system, where everyone must pay a specific amount of everything they earn.

On the other hand, the right believes that there should be less tax payments for people who produce more, as this could contribute to the well-being of society.

In the case of health and education, the left believes that the government should play a greater role, providing care facilities and a free and accessible educational system for all. On the other hand, the right thinks that these should be provided by private entities.

How did the terms left and right come about?
The political terms left and right originated in the 18th century during the French Revolution and are based on seating arrangements in the French National Assembly.

Those who sat on the left of the parliamentary president supported the revolution, opposing the monarchy. They were in favor of a radical change, which would lead to the end of the monarchy and give more power to the people. Therefore, this ideology is related to the workers’ struggle.

Those who sat on the right supported the old monarchist regime. The stronger their opposition to change and their desire to preserve traditional society, the more to the right they would be. Tradition, institutional religion and the privatization of the economy were considered the fundamental values ​​of the right.

Socialism is, broadly speaking, a political and economic system in which property and the means of production are owned in common, typically controlled by the state or government. Socialism is based on the idea that common or public ownership of resources and means of production leads to a more equal society.

General Socialism
In defining socialism, it's important to first define capitalism. Capitalism is based on private ownership of resources and means of production, and individual choices in a free market. This is in contrast to socialism. According to socialist philosophy, these features of capitalism lead to inequalities in wealth and hence power, and the exploitation of workers. According to socialism, notions of individual freedom and equality of opportunity are available only to those who control the means of production. In a capitalist society, this means a few rich capitalists hold power at the expense of the working class. In a socialist system, however, it is argued that since everyone controls the means of production, everyone is free.

Communism
Communism is a form of socialism based on the writings of German philosopher and economist Karl Marx. In a fully realized communist society, all property and goods are commonly owned by a society without government or class divisions. In such a society, production and distribution of goods is handled, according to Karl Marx, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

Democratic Socialism
Democratic socialism is a form of socialism which emphasizes that both the economy and society should be run democratically, and that the goal is to meet the needs of all the people, not just a rich few. Some socialists argue that socialism does not necessarily require the government to run everything. Instead, business institutions should be run by those workers and consumers that are affected by them. This could be implemented, for example, as worker-run cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives.

Left and Right in current policy
Over the years, this division between right and left has become more complex, as new demands and interests have emerged. Thus, the concepts of right and left were no longer sufficient to define the political ideals of the parties.

So it was necessary to create other divisions to explain the different parties and their demands. The most used are: extreme left, left, center-left, center, center-right, right and extreme right.

Groups with more radical and extreme ideas are at the ends, while in the center are the parties that act more moderately and that have a greater electoral appeal.

People Who Identify As Liberal Are Revealing Their Most "Right-Wing" 23 Views, And It's Fascinating People who identify as liberal are revealing their most "right-wing" political opinions, and the responses are going viral. It turns out even the most diehard, lifelong Democrats might disagree with their party about a thing or two.

On the flip side, conservatives are sharing their most "left-wing" opinions — you can read that list here.

The conversation started when Reddit user u/JuiceNoodle posed a question to the internet: "Left-wingers, what is your most right-wing opinion? Right-wingers, what is your most left-wing opinion?"
a blue donkey and a red elephant.

23 Read the top-voted responses from liberals below — and then check out how conservatives answered the same question:

1. "Lefty here. I own tons of guns."
a gun and bullets

2. "I'm left-wing, and I personally believe that cancel culture shouldn't apply to things people did when they were younger. If you were a racist when you were 19 and have moved on and acknowledged that you used to be stupid, then you're fine. So long as you're not a prick anymore."
—James

3. "Left-wing. One misguided tweet from seven years ago should not get you fired from an unrelated job today."
—Hititwitharock

4. "Left-winger. I think we have started to expect an unreasonable level of moral purity from people, and our attempts to make everything PC is akin to the war on drugs in that it does far more hurt than good. Nuance has also been lost, and many on the left have resorted to black-and-white thinking. Calling people out or canceling them doesn't help anyone, and I can't think of anything more dreary than a fully-sanitized world."
—fu*kingweeabootrash

5. "Left-winger here. A strong military is still necessary. Decisive action is still necessary. BETTER DECISIONS ABOUT THE USE of our military are very much needed."
a military group boarding a plane.

6. "I’m very left-wing socialist (US), but I believe that owning guns should stay a right. I think gun control is important but we have to make sure not to backpedal on our first 10 constitutional amendments because it sets a precedent and would make room for the government to take away other constitutional rights. I’m not usually a fan of 'slippery slope' arguments, but I think the consequences of giving the government that much control could be really bad."
—sopranope

7. "Left-winger here. I don’t think the economy of any nation can support unlimited immigration."
—jeremyxt

8. "Leftist here! I think the border wall is a good idea. Walls make for better neighbors, in many circumstances. And the USA has a responsibility to its citizens and its neighbors to police the border."
—spammmmmmmmy

9. "Left of center here. During the pandemic, the US southern border should be closed to non-cargo traffic."
—ACatNamedScrambles

10. "Pretty far left. Capitalism isn’t all bad. Runaway capitalism is bad, but so is any other -ism if left unchecked."
—BOSS_OF_THE_INTERNET

11. "Leftie. Some cultures are really, really fucking backward and need to be fearlessly called out on their shit."
—HerbertIsBestBert

12. "Left wing. Political correctness going too far is the sole reason, in my opinion, why Trump got elected."
—BostonConnor11

13. "Left-winger here: I believe you can joke about anything. As long as it's made in good fun (not made with the overt intent to cause pain to other people) you can joke about literally any subject no matter how traumatic, evil, or disgusting it may be. Now, I'm not saying jokes should be a complete free-for-all, there can be a wrong place or time for one, but it's just not realistic or satisfying to say you can never joke about something."
Dave Chapelle
—ScandalousMalady

14. "Left-winger here. I am strongly against cancel culture and removing scenes from old movies or banning them. Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it."
—NotTaken-username

15. "Left-winger here. My most right-leaning opinion is my disagreement with ACAB ('All Cops Are Bastards'). I’m certainly not pro-cop and agree that a lot of cops, far too many of them, are bastards. There needs to be sweeping changes and more accountability, but law enforcement is necessary, and by calling all of them bastards we discourage any of the few people that are trying to help. I would prefer something more like FTMCAFB,DBOOT ('Far Too Many Cops Are Fucking Bastards, Don't Be One Of Them'), but I understand that’s a mouthful and not a pronounceable acronym."
—OneMoorePhoto

16. "Left here. 'Defund the police' is arguably the worst possible name for the police reform movement. It should be 'Reallocate police funds so cops learn how to do their jobs better and stop murdering Black people.'"
—Justincalisd

17. "I'm far left and I'm worried about the more gullible people in my party. Those who are afraid of vaccines and nuclear power and GMOs are of grave concern to me, as it is based on the same failure to understand and accept reality that the right is so terribly guilty of. Facts and evidence matter. There is one reality, one truth. Gender isn't a binary and global warming is real — and GMOs are safe to eat and nuclear power is a handleable problem."
a woman protesting GMOs
—r3dlazer

18. "Leftie here, but my conservative opinion comes from being an ESL teacher. If you move to an English-speaking country, you need to learn English. And I don't mean, 'Learn to speak English!' in the way jerks shout it at anyone with an accent. But, just genuinely, you need to do everything you can to learn the language of the country you’re living in. I know it’s hard, it’s overwhelming. ... But it will get you further in your new life than almost any other skill."
—Ihavenofishonlywater

19. "I’m pretty left-wing, but I believe that the death penalty can be justified in some situations."
—RubyCaper

20. "Leftie here. Honestly, I think the death penalty is deserved in many cases. The reason I'm so against it is I simply don't trust the people in charge to use it on the right people."
—Editor_In_Queef

21. "Left-winger. Government should have to balance the budget."
—MelInPractice

22. "Left-winger here. As a Filipino from the Philippines, I think people policing culture appropriation is fucking dumb. Especially when they're American (not necessarily white). Also kinda peeved with the whole "Filipinx" thing. It's dumb, especially when our language's pronouns are gender neutral."
—Slight-Caterpillar32

23. "Generally left, but the government should not be writing down people’s student debt. Fix the system by properly funding nonprofit educational institutions, make 0% loans or refinancing available to debtors, and maybe give relief to those who were conned by for-profit institutions (while suing for restitution and eliminating them). But people made the choice to go into massive debt for degrees that are useless because they wanted 'the college experience.' How about the experience of not starting out your life in debt? Improve high school counseling and trade education, and make sure people know that they have the option to learn a trade and be more successful than spending four years going into debt for something that will not help them further their careers or lives. Will help bring much-needed manufacturing jobs to the US, too."

22 Conservatives Shared Their Most "Left-Wing" Political Beliefs, And There Were Some Surprising Twists People who identify as conservative are revealing their most "left-wing" political opinions, and the responses are eye-opening. We often think of America as being starkly divided between "red states" and "blue states." But in reality, an individual's political views can be much more complicated than that — and often, surprising.
Steve Kornacki looking at a political map of the USA

22 Liberals also shared their most "right-wing" opinions — you can read that list here.

It all started when Reddit user u/JuiceNoodle posed a question to the internet: "Left-wingers, what is your most right-wing opinion? Right-wingers, what is your most left-wing opinion?"
red and blue boxing gloves

You can read the top-voted responses from conservatives below — and be sure to check out how liberals answered the same question:

1. "Right-winger here. No one should have to go bankrupt for getting sick or injured."
a hospital patient
—Fullbackhabit

2. "Right-winger, mostly. The idea that police can break into your home wearing civilian clothes is a travesty and makes a mockery of the Bill of Rights. And civil asset forfeiture is theft. Like actual, literal theft."
—PurplePandaBear8

3. "Right-winger. The coal and mining industry should not be subsidized or 'saved.' Investment in wind and solar energy isn’t a bad idea."
—HereIam06

4. "Conservative by nature...but I believe in the right to collective bargaining (unions). Organized labor is a double-edged sword, but people should be able to negotiate wages and conditions as a group."
—dad_sparky_engineer

5. "Right-winger. Pollution is theft."
pollutants in the air
—Gepo1234

6. "Right-winger here. I think way too many of us right-wingers don’t believe in global warming, and I don’t know why."
—BetterBelow

7. "Right-wing. I'm not against gay marriage. I don't really see it as any of my business. I support the decriminalization of all drugs and believe usage and addiction should be treated as public health issues, not crimes. I support the release of inmates with non-violent possession convictions. No one should be in jail for possession."
—Traditional-Crew-633

8. "I'm personally a middle-of-the-road moderate, but I identify more with the right. My most left-leaning opinion is probably that no one should have to go bankrupt or fucking die trying to get their meds and medical care."
—Dragonsbreath67

9. "My most left-wing opinion has to do with prison conditions. I oppose private prisons and support better conditions for prisoners. Prison should be a punishment, but prisoners don't lose their human dignity — no matter what they did. They deserve a minimum standard of treatment, and from a pragmatic standpoint, it makes things both safer for the guards and other prisoners. If having TV keeps them from killing each other, I'm all for it."
a prison guard
—Dr_Talon

10. "I'm very conservative. My left-wing opinion is about the destruction of rainforests. Once a primeval (old) forest is cut down, it never regrows the same. What eventually replaces it is secondary forest and grass, which is totally different from the original forest. I am totally against deforestation in almost all cases, unless it's land that was specifically designated to be grown and then cut down by responsible logging companies."
—MrPerson296

11. "Right-winger. Legalize weed already."
—TheClassicPinneapple

12. "Right-winger. Military and war take up too much federal spending, and we should focus on peacemaking and cooperation with other countries."
—pinpinreddit

13. "Right-wing conservative here. People should have agency over their bodies. Taking drugs shouldn't be illegal. Getting an abortion isn't the government's business. Etc."
a pro-choice abortion sign
—Cheeseburgerlion

14. "I’m a conservative. Most people on my side of the aisle act like they want small government and less control of their rights, so I’ve never understood why they are so against police reform measures. Yes, we obviously need police to an extent, but why the hell do they need so much power? If they weren’t out there with the ability to engage with any person by force over any small perceived violation of some city ordinance, then many situations that turn bad wouldn’t come to pass."
—Mountain_Situation89

15. "Right-winger and straight-ticket Republican voter until 2016. ... I think it is insane that Republicans espouse personal liberties but are so anti-LGBTQ+ i.e. people exercising their personal liberties. I happen to be bisexual and secular so my opinion is biased, but isn't what consenting adults do in their own time with other consenting adults being REGULATED BY THE GOVERNMENT also a matter of encroachment upon personal liberties?"
—NeuroNeptunian

16. "Right-winger and Catholic. I personally don't agree with abortion on a personal level for moral reasons, but I fully support someone's right to get one and do not understand why people die on that hill. I'm also a pretty huge supporter of gay people having equal rights. Mind-blowing that people still give a fu*k about that."
—Selfdestructor999

17. "Right-winger here. Freedom of movement between nations is a good thing."
a pro-immigration protest sign
—DallasBoy95

18. "Right-winger here. I'm in favor of UBI (Universal Basic Income). This single program would fix so much. It would replace all welfare, social assistance, and minimum wage programs. It would allow employers to pay what they want for work done, but gives workers negotiating leverage in accepting work terms that work for them. The only thing I can't figure out is how to prevent goods and services pricing from inflating because everyone would have a cost floor."
—SnowbackMcGee

19. "I'm very conservative. ... I utterly despise trophy hunting. Deer and quail are one thing because they live everywhere and are plentiful. Rhinos, lions, elephants, etc. are not, and I don't care how much money someone has to pay for a license to do it, because I still hate it."
—MrPerson296

20. "Right-winger here (non-American). Health care and education are two fundamental pillars of any functioning society and should absolutely be provided to all citizens."
—TheRealTahulrik

21. "I’m probably right-wing, but I believe strongly in the existence of rape culture. It wasn’t until college that I saw it for myself and realized how scared I’d be as a woman."

And finally...
22. "Center-right-winger. In general, the right is in shambles and it’s a disgrace that we’re the side of climate change deniers, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-vax, flat Earth, as well as having to hold our heads in shame for the Capitol riot."

The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people.

All politicians practice making faces in the mirror so they know how they look when pretending to be surprised, moved, sad, happy, interested, or kind. All politicians have drunk their own piss after taking shrooms in an effort to get re-shroomed. All politicians periodically wrap themselves up in a deer carcass and scare neighborhood dogs. All politicians yearn to dance like no one is watching. All politicians sometimes sit on the floor when no one is home and pretend to be a crumb.

‘We The People’ vs. ‘Us The People’

Q: Populists often stress democratic values by invoking the phrase “we the people,” but lately they’ve taken to using it not just as a subject but as an object as well. Thus: “We must never allow [insert villain] to trample on we the people!”

A: “We the people” is a subject; “us the people” is an object. Here’s how they look in sentences:

“We, the people, elect our leaders. Our leaders are elected by us, the people.”

In both of those noun phrases, “the people” is an appositive. It identifies or explains the preceding noun or pronoun by using a different term (like the name in “My son, John”).

We’ve written on the blog before about appositives, which are sometimes surrounded by commas, as in our examples above.

An appositive never changes the case (that is, subject or object) of the pronoun it follows. That’s why the entire phrase “we the people” is always a subject and “us the people” is always an object.

The words “we the people” resonate with Americans because they introduce the Preamble to the Constitution:

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” If ever a phrase deserved proper handling, it’s “we the people.” It’s demeaned when misused as a grammatical object (as in, “Don’t trample on we the people!”).

Justice Byron White wrote, “Money is constantly being solicited on behalf of candidates, who run on platforms and who claim support on the basis of their views and what they intend to do or have done. Whatever ethical considerations and appearances may indicate, to hold that legislators commit the federal crime of extortion when they act for the benefit of constituents or support legislation furthering the interests of some of their constituents, shortly before or after campaign contributions are solicited and received from those beneficiaries, is an unrealistic assessment of what Congress could have meant by making it a crime…”

But the power of money to get donors political access and influence has expanded with the whittling away of corruption laws. I believe that because of the Supreme Court’s erosion of limits on many kinds of campaign contributions, our current means of financing campaigns has devolved into a form of legalized bribery. Donors pour money into races to get officials who will support their favored goals.

When the officials deliver, the money keeps rolling in. One example: After passage of the tax bill in December, conservative billionaire Charles Koch and his wife gave nearly $500,000 to House Speaker Paul Ryan’s PAC.

In my opinion, the Supreme Court majority’s decisions on corruption have demonstrated little concern about the corrosive effect of the decisions on the public’s faith in their government. In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, the court struck down limits imposed on corporations to make “independent expenditures” on behalf of candidates because they “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.”

According to Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion, “the appearance of influence or access will not cause the electorate to lose faith in this democracy.”

After years of the Supreme Court narrowing even minimal protections against public corruption, the U.S. now has a system where what looks like bribery and corruption to the public is, in most cases, not illegal. Our political leaders are no longer kept in line by federal corruption law. They do not need to worry that if they bend over backwards to accommodate a donor’s wishes, it could spark a bribery charge.

Majority Of Americans See Congress As Out Of Touch Politicians Are Corrupt ?

However the likely drama over how to fund the government past Sept. 30 unfolds, most Americans appear to have little faith in most lawmakers to do the right thing. Majorities believe that most members of Congress are "out of touch with average Americans" (79%), "focused on the needs of special interests" rather than the needs of their constituents (69%) and corrupt (52%). Americans are less critical of their own representatives, but substantial percentages say their own member of Congress is out of touch (48%), focused on special interests (47%) and corrupt (32%). These results come from Gallup's annual Governance poll, conducted Sept. 9-13. By any measure, Congress is not a popular or trusted institution among Americans. The body's current approval rating, 14%, is typical of its ratings over the past several years. Earlier this year, Gallup found that fewer than one in 10 Americans (8%) have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in Congress.

Traditionally, Americans have been less critical of their own members of Congress, but last year the percentage of U.S. adults saying their own representative deserved re-election dropped to a record low. These uneasy feelings Americans have for Congress may be exacerbated in the coming days, as the prospect of a government shutdown looms. House Speaker John Boehner's unexpected resignation on Friday highlights how acrimonious congressional divisions have become, leading the House speaker to step down well before his term ends. Speculation is rampant that Boehner's resignation may actually be the action that prevents a government shutdown this week. But if this is true, it could confirm some of Americans' worst impressions of Congress, as it would suggest that simple legislative functions, such as funding the federal government, are enough to thrust the House into leadership turmoil.

Majorities of Americans view most members of Congress as corrupt, beholden to special interests and out of touch. This is not new and perhaps not even surprising, given the low esteem in which Americans hold the institution. But this cynicism is beginning to influence Americans' views of their own federal representatives, not just the national legislature. Record or near-record numbers of U.S. adults say their local representative is out of touch and focused on serving special interests rather than their constituents.

Congress is under greater-than-usual stress, with the House speaker's abrupt resignation and a possible government shutdown. Numerous members of Congress have cast this battle as a principled one, even if it results in disruptive outcomes such as a shutdown, or, as is apparently the case, the abrupt resignation of the top lawmaker in the House. But given the large proportion of Americans who believe members of Congress have far less altruistic motives, it is doubtful many Americans will see the showdown as a dispute over how best to serve the nation's interests.

Are All Politicians Liars ? - I can’t tell you how many times I have been assured by people on my conservative side of the political spectrum that “all politicians are liars.” It’s a common riposte when I encourage people to get involved in the political process and vote or when I flag the flagrant untruths uttered by the Democrat pantheon of political liars (the Clintons, Gore, Kerry, Kamala, the Bidens, Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer, the MSM, etc., etc.) to my friends on the Left. For many, it seems, it is an excuse to accept the status quo and embrace inaction.

Well, in fairness, we Republicans have hardly been without sin, especially now that we must deal with an obscure, newly elected-fabulist congressman from Long Island, George Santos. Because Santos is a Republican, his lies aren’t as acceptable to the Left as those of a Democrat would be for Democrats and their media flacks. But should they be acceptable to us on the Right? I admit to a certain degree of schadenfreude seeing a Republican capture high office using the same tactics used by our Democrat opponents; as Saul Alinsky noted in rule #4 for radicals, “make the enemy live up to their own rules.”

Here is the problem, though: once we accept the premise that “all politicians lie”, we lower the bar for all politicians; we establish lying as an acceptable criterion for politicians. I don’t accept that premise: I know plenty of politicians that are stand-up individuals and not liars.

Now, by a “lie,” I don’t mean the Democrat definition thereof as it applies to their opponents, which is basically anything they don’t agree with, along with exaggerations, and honest mistakes uttered in order to gain ground against one’s opponents. Come to think of it, the Democrat justifications for lying track closely with the Islamic concept of “Taqiyya,” where dissimulation is deemed perfectly okay as long as it advances the faith.

No, by “lie,” I mean a material lie uttered deliberately to hide malfeasance or advance one’s agenda. We should never accept this.

The late psychiatrist, M. Scott Peck, author of People of the Lie: The Hope for Healing Human Evil, devoted his career to understanding the roots of evil. He concluded that, starting with the Biblical story of Genesis, at the core of all human evil rests a lie. Peck described a dynamic whereby people begin as small children telling small lies that, if not called out, metastasize into bigger and bigger lies.

Liars, like all criminals, eventually justify their vice by claiming that “everyone does it,” so why shouldn’t they lie? And, because “all” people lie, no one can trust what other people say.

At some point on this trajectory, liars begin to lie to themselves, and that is where their worldviews depart from reality. There are all kinds of lies…lies of commission; lies of omission; lies of deflection, gaslighting….

Look around our country today and note the scale of damage that a culture of lies has done to our once-healthy Western society. Look at our social, news, and entertainment media and note how lies are celebrated for their brazenness.

Consider how much humor is wrapped into celebrating the brazenness of lies. Just look at our youth entertainment, even in such iconic youth movies like Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (to cite just one example).

What on earth have we been teaching our kids? In much of our society today, lies are celebrated…as long as you get away with it. Really good liars become cultural and political icons.

Only 75 years ago, the United States, like most of northern Europe, was viewed as a “high-trust” society, where a high level of social trust allowed for healthy transactions between individuals to occur, buttressed by robust legal, political, and informational systems. This was a big factor that helped fuel our economy.

While some countries (e.g., the Nordic countries, Switzerland) still qualify as high-trust societies today, the past decades in the U.S. and many European countries have witnessed a breathtaking collapse of trust in our most important public and private institutions. I live in an area of our country where many transactions are still done with a handshake. Sadly, my county and others like it are the exception in America, not the rule.

Our moral and ethical collapse will continue as long as we accept that it is okay for others, especially politicians and institutions, to lie. The consequences are serious: low-trust countries and economies usually qualify as global laggards plagued by poor economies, social and political oppression, and internal conflicts.

Want an example? Look at Russia and the disastrous decisions it made vis à vis Ukraine, decisions that were founded on the web of lies interwoven throughout its security establishment. Russia faces disaster because it lied to itself and created an alternate reality built on falsehoods. We cannot hope to maintain our global leadership as a country if we devolve into a society of liars that lie with impunity.

The right response to our continued decline is for Republicans and conservatives once again to stand athwart our road to perdition, as conservative icon William F. Buckley once did, and yell, “Stop!” We should never allow ourselves to accept that lying is OK. If we do, then we become complicit in a long and painful decline to third-world status.

It is not for Democrats to pass judgment on Rep. George Santos; they have no standing to do so. Neither is it the purview of Congressional Republicans to remove Santos, as he was duly elected by his constituents. But he can be sanctioned in other ways: shunned, humiliated, and otherwise disgraced. The sanctioning of Santos should be done very publicly, in-house, by Republicans and other conservatives, as an example for all the world to see because there is so much at stake.

Russia spoke clearly about what it would do if the US used its proxy state, the Ukraine, to threaten it with NATO membership. The US continued so Russia did what it did. If the author wants to see how lies played a part, look at the US lying and scheming via Victoria Nulled to install a non democratic government that we wanted in 2014. And then look at all the vast corruption the US has participated in Ukraine, including in this amazingly phony war which is really just a money laundering scheme for the Democrat Party. If the author wants to reform the lying, he should have a better understanding of who is lying, who is not. At this moment in time, the US government is the HQ of Lying, and Russia is just trying to survive the US/Globalist/WEF mammoth tsunami of lying all done to establish the New World Order.

We have 435 Representatives in the House. We elect Kings. The reason they lie is because if they didn't, we wouldn't elect them. They say, "I will do this" or "I will do that" when they know they don't have the power to do it. The problem is when they have no intention of actually doing anything like what they say. That's why I've given up on the system IN TOTAL. The RINOs have had ample opportunity to limit government and spending, but they don't do it. I vote against incumbents unless I see a real reason to think they are trying to move things in the right direction. In the meantime, I wait to see what they will make worse next.

Lies, lies, lies, that's the world of today. All meant to help confuse and numb the complacent minds of the sheeple. Straight from the Saul Alinsky playbook. What better way for the Media to help break down the Western Civilization than to normalize lies? We are constantly bombarded with them. The destruction of the West is rolling along at a good clip.

BUT, only CONSEQUENCES will stop the madness, and the Politicians have proven over and over that they believe there are no consequences for anything they do. And so far, that has proven to be true.

Because the Globalists/WEF/Elites led by Klaus Schwab will stop at nothing to achieve their goals of a totalitarian One-World Government led by the Elites. And nothing they have done has had any consequences, either. And they know there won't be any. The lies are all part of the Great Re-Set and it's working.

Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead and kids too. so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now.

With few exceptions for human trafficking and pedophile and gangs and sex and drug cartels and any and all criminal organization. All State law requires people to meet certain criteria before they can carry, possess, or dispose of a firearm. These qualifying factors include the following:

Be a citizen of the United States.
Be at least 21 years old, except for honorably discharged individuals from either the New York National Guard or the United States Military.
Be of good moral character.
Never had a guardian appointed based on incapacity, mental illness, subnormal intelligence, or other condition or disease.
Never had a handgun license revoked.
Never civilly confined in a secure treatment facility.
Never convinced in all state or anywhere else of a felony or “serious offense.” The definition of “serious offense” includes acts like aiding in an escape from prison, child endangerment, disorderly conduct, illegally using a dangerous weapon, making burglar instruments, rape, receiving stolen property, sodomy, and unlawfully entering a building.
Never discharged from the military under dishonorable conditions.
Never involuntarily committed to a facility under the Department of Mental Hygiene’s jurisdiction.
Not be a fugitive from justice.
Not be an addicted or unlawful user of any controlled substance.
Not have a domestic violence restraining order filed against you.
Not illegally in the United States or admitted into the United States under a non-immigrant visa.
Not present any other “good cause” for denial of the license.
These are some of the most common reasons why people in New York are denied gun permits. Also, you will likely be required to complete a gun safety class before obtaining a firearm permit.

P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2008. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. For some reason, we don’t think “Gun Control” is the ‘real’ issue. It’s a great distraction and it causes division among the citizens. We think the Government is secure in their knowledge of their ‘new’ crowd control devices, that we know about, and their “Frequency and Earthquake Weapons” they think we don’t know about. We will be exploring their ‘new’ capabilities soon in greater detail. Yes We The People Of The New World Order Thank You!

Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them... If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government... Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling.

The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext new world order!

P.S. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them... If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government... Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling at 987-654-3210 Ext. New World Order!

In response to the point you make, I agree that we seem to have been protected from the possible existence of ambivalence in political views as if it were some sort of secret. It feels a little strange to say that it is for the public’s best interest, but that’s sort of what I’m arguing.

The left – right divide may not so much serve as dichotomous camps that we must choose between, rather they serve as a simplified roadmap to guide the less politically aware public. What will determine where you place yourself will depend on how much weight you give to specific topics. It’s generally accepted that the citizenship will not know about where they stand on each individual issue, so by using this shortcut they can hopefully make an educated guess that will eventually serve them well.

Show less