We have no reason to be against nuclear energy other than prejudice & stupidity – Dr Patrick Moore

Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, on the catastrophic consequences of 'Net Zero':

"If we actually achieved Net Zero, at least 50% of the population would die of hunger and disease. [Because] at least 50% of the population depends on nitrogen fertiliser for its existence. And there's people trying to ban it, and Netherlands and Sri Lanka have already made these kinds of moves. So it is truly a death wish in disguise, and the disguise is to save the Earth, which doesn't need saving, particularly."

BizNews interview with Dr Patrick Moore, one of the co-founders of Greenpeace and the most prominent figures in the field of environmentalism, Moore makes a compelling case for nuclear energy. Moore shares why he was silenced on the topic of nuclear energy during his years at Greenpeace and provides excellent insight into both the misconceptions around the risks of nuclear energy and why nuclear energy is not inherently evil in any way. Moore argues that we should conserve the most precious fuels we have, which are fossil fuels, by replacing them with nuclear energy where feasible. A brilliant perspective on the world's current energy dilemma and the best way forward.

TIMESTAMPS.

00:00 Dr Patrick Moore on nuclear energy
01:49 On speaking in South Africa
02:22 On Germany giving up nuclear energy and going along with Net Zero
03:28 On Net Zero being a death wish in disguise
04:42 On those enforcing Net Zero and the World Economic Forum
05:34 On silviculture in Europe
06:26 On natural gas and fracking
07:07 On the beauty of natural gas
08:00 On the carbon dioxide we get from burning fossil fuels being the backbone of planet Earth
10:45 On the bans and virtual criminalisation of nuclear energy
12:43 On the longevity and durability of a nuclear plant
13:08 On the comparison of energy generation
13:32 On those countries who aren't following Net Zero regulations
14:43 On nuclear energy being the safest and longest-lasting energy source
15:27 On electric vehicles
16:40 On the "Greens" not being very green
17:07 On his advocacy for nuclear energy being heavily criticised by Greenpeace
19:11 On nuclear energy being lumped together with the negative aspects of nuclear science
20:08 On carbon dioxide being inherently good for the Earth
21:29 On fossil fuels being labelled as dirty energy
22:36 On the issues we can address to respect the Earth more
24:06 On the life we have now and its ability to flourish

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kAb4Qq9kEc