Legal expert: Prince Harry's royal protection case will likely lose in the UK

Legal expert: Prince Harry's royal protection case will likely lose in the UK

If you are still wondering what Prince Harry's "loss in court" yesterday meant, The Telegraph published an article that included a straight report on what Harry's team argued and what the judge decided. Harry was arguing about Ravec, the secretive group that decides who receives royal protection. He was also arguing whether Harry's offer to pay his own police security in the UK had been properly made to Ravec and the Met police. Harry argued that he had the right to make his case personally to Ravec, or to make an offer written. This offer should have been considered. Harry...

If you are still wondering what Prince Harry's "loss in court" yesterday meant, The Telegraph published an article that included a straight report on what Harry's team argued and what the judge decided. Harry was arguing about Ravec, the secretive group that decides who receives royal protection. He was also arguing whether Harry's offer to pay his own police security in the UK had been properly made to Ravec and the Met police. Harry argued that he had the right to make his case personally to Ravec, or to make an offer written. This offer should have been considered. Harry does not have the right to "formally represent" his position on this issue, according to the judge. It's a case about Ravec bureaucracy and royal protection services, and the judge ruled for the bureaucracy. Harry's case still has other issues to be decided. Would you like to see some biased analyses on the case in the meantime? The Daily Beast's Royalist has the following: The ruling by a British judge that Prince Harry could not legally challenge the British Government's decision to deny him the right to pay for police security while he was in the U.K. does not bode well for his argument that he should have automatic high-level protection when he's in the U.K. Harry and Meghan will be dealt a new blow by the ruling, just days after being accused of exaggerating their security concerns when they claimed they had been the subject of "near-catastrophic" paparazzi chase through Manhattan's streets. The ruling on Tuesday is not the end of Harry's case for automatic police protection he and his family should have while in Britain, a right Harry feels he has due to his "inherited risk". However, some see it as a sign that Harry's whole action is about to go down the drain. Mark Stephens told The Daily Beast that "the writing is now on the wall" for this case. He said that he always thought Harry would not win, but now he felt more confident. Stephens stated that Stephens's argument that the state can decide whom it wants to protect, to what extent and that it cannot be forced to hire out the police force was supported. The British Home Office claimed that allowing wealthy individuals such as Harry to purchase police protection would undermine the public's confidence in police officers and take them away from their core responsibilities. Harry was able to argue his main claim, that he is entitled to automatic British protection, at a previous hearing. This was not decided on Tuesday and the case continues. The Daily Beast Harry's case, in my opinion, serves as a reminder of how poorly British institutions are run and that they lack intelligence or integrity. Harry is entitled to expect and demand high-level protection from the police whenever he visits the UK. He's an extremely well-known individual and is a target of high level for domestic terrorists. Harry and his family are not under any threat, but the state argues that Harry's safety should be determined based on his "working royal" status. Harry believes that the police protection he receives (only when he is in the UK) should come as standard, and he should be able to reimburse the taxpayers. Ravec and police fighting Harry over these issues is utterly absurd. The Sun reported that the state had already spent PS300,000.00 in legal fees to combat Harry's legal action. The Mail reported that Harry would spend around PS500,000 on legal fees. Harry's point is to draw attention to the dysfunctional and outdated institutions. Harry wants to show that he is eager to return to his native land more often, but that the "powers-that-be" are not willing to ensure his safety and in fact are fighting in court to deny him police protection. Backgrid is the source of these photos. Did you miss our previous article... https://wawawiiwa.com/celebrity/angel...