Stunned by Season 2 of 'Love Hate' - My Reaction!

Hi all and welcome to my channel.

In this video, I react to Love/Hate, Season 2, Episode 1, where we see a year after his shooting, Darren is left plagued by nightmares and with one functioning lung.

But he's getting his life back together, hoping to get back with his beloved Rosie (now living in London) and doing some work for up-and-coming cigarette smuggler and loan shark Fran.

This episode scores 7.9/10 on IMDB and was written by Stuart Carolan and directed by David Caffrey. This Episode was produced by RTE, Octagon Studios and ITV Studios

This episode stars Aiden Gillen, Robert Sheehan, Ruth Negga, Tom Vaughan Lawlor and Art Campion amongst other.

The full episodes can be viewed on www.rte.ie/player if you are based in Ireland and are also available for purchase at the RTE Store at www.rte.ie and via all the main online and physical media outlets.

Hopefully you will enjoy this reaction video and please like, comment and subscribe to see more of this content and don't forget to join me for Season 1, Episode 4 very shortly.

Please note that all GIFs used in the reaction were sourced from www.giphy.com and were credited to the following:

• Broke Broke – TLC Europe
• Did I Stutter – The Roku Channel
• I never Narc’d on Nobody – The Fast Saga
• I’m just being a good parent – Defy TV
• You guys love each other – Buzz Feed
• Obviously – Red Bull
• Get Potty Trained – Storyful
• My Bills are paid – TLC Europe
• Paranoid – Defy TV
• Show me the money – ION
• Panic Attacks – Buzz Feed
• Obviously I’m biased – Big Brother
• Traumatised for Breakfast – Rick and Morty
• Drugs make you paranoid – Succession HBO
• Alarm – This is Sports Center
• The Exit – Parks and Recreation via Peacock
• So much money – Nigel Ng
• To me it’s like Drugs – Krewella
• Ladies know me – The Fast Saga

Legal and Copyright Disclaimers: Under the Copyright and Related Rights Act of Ireland, 2000, Fair dealing with a work for the purposes of criticism or review of that or another work or of a performance of a work shall not infringe any copyright in the work where the criticism or review is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In this Part, “sufficient acknowledgement” means an acknowledgement identifying the work concerned by its title or other description and identifying the author. The Principal Act, as amended in 2019, is amended, by the substitution of the following section for section 221: Fair dealing with a performance or recording for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another performance or recording, or of a work, shall not infringe any of the rights conferred by this Part. Fair dealing with a recording of a performance for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche shall not infringe the copyright in that work. In this Part, ‘fair dealing’ means the making use of a performance or recording which has been lawfully made available to the public for a purpose and to an extent which will not unreasonably prejudice the interests of the rights owner where such use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. In addition, as per the Judgement on the 26 April 2022 in the CJEU Case C-401/19, Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the EU: it was noted in that judgement that the interpretation of Article 17(7), second paragraph, requires that member states permit users of online sharing services are authorised to upload and make available content generated by themselves for the specific purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody or pastiche. This video as a reaction video for the purposes of quotation, criticism, review and parody falls within the criteria set out by that judgement and the mandatory requirements of the EU Copyright Directive For any and all claims of copyright the following evidence will be requested: - Evidence of Copyright or Related Copyright rights - Evidence of breach of copyright exceptions as noted above - Evidence that the video has negatively impacted the market share of the original work and that the copyright holder has lost revenue as a result of the video - Evidence that it was not reasonable or fair to use the amount of the copyright work utilised in the video - Evidence of the video being re-edited to constitute what forms fair use under copyright law Note: All attempts at fraudulent copyright claims such as those made by non-copyright holders, e.g. distributors, will be reported to the police as attempted fraud!