2 years ago

Table of Contents
00:00 - Intro
02:42 - Some common statements
04:50 - Neil’s Claim
07:15 - What are the consequences if there is NO objective morality?
07:51 - Debate between Frederick Copleston and Bertrand Russel
09:25 - Mother Teresa and Hilter
10:45 - Claim: There is no objective morality so we base our morality on what is best for your society.
11:33 - Claim: There is no objective morality so we base our morality on what is best for MANKIND.
13:13 - Claim: Good and Bad is decided by a majority vote.
15:36 - Claim: Maybe objective and absolute moral values don’t exist?
15:55 - To prove objective moral values Do exist, I just need to show you ONE objective moral value.
17:55 - Why do people abandon the concept of Objective Morality?
22:02 - The Hierarchy of Laws
32:07 - There is an Objective Morality and God decides what it is.
32:20 - Whose God and how do you know what his morals are?
32:51 - Apologetics
33:48 - Refute “It is wrong to force your morality on others”
37:15 - Refute “You can’t legislate morality.”
40:05 - Refute “Laws can’t change hearts”
44:25 - The LAW is there for a purpose and the consequences of disobeying God’s Law
46:05 - Even atheists should want Christians making laws.
50:28 - Q&A 1: Law in North Korea and income tax in US
55:05 - Q&A 2: Free moral agent; daily moral choice
56:53 - Q&A 3: Universal truth