Why modern Science will never accept the Theory of Everything

I was wondering why metaphysics has such a hard time these days. I have noticed that there are many walls that need to be broken through. The biggest wall is between materialist science and esoteric science. There are many prejudices and fears that prevent these two sciences from coming together. These are the smaller walls that need to be broken down. If these mental walls fall, the big wall between physical and metaphysical worldviews will also fall. Then nothing stands in the way of seeing them as one.
A little warning beforehand. I have some strange views and I will say things here that may sound totally insane to some. For example, that modern science is currently at the flat earth level if it comes to philosophy and evolution of mind, perception and morality. With everything that goes with it. Cult behavior. Simply not wanting the truth. Or mocking and fighting scientists who want to explain that mind and morality is not static, but arises under certain conditions and changes continuously. Just as the earth is not a static flat circle, but a globe, which arises under certain conditions and changes continuously.
Do not misunderstand. It is not about questioning the whole of modern science. It is only about the fact that something is missing. One stands confused and dual split between physics and quantum physics. What is missing is the third physics. Quantum physics describes the small. Physics describes the large. Metaphysics places itself above it and describes the large and the small as a unity connected by a spectrum.
So those are the three types of physics and a few of their scientists. But of course, these scientists are also cross-platform. Isaac Newton, as is known, also dealt with alchemy and the esoteric sciences. After all, everything is about the question of the logical basic structure of our reality. One can quickly switch from one to the other because it's largely the same thing.
Many scientists keep metaphysics at a distance, because it can become mystical and religious there very fast. Funnily, they use the term God too if it is about a universal formula for everything. There one speaks then fast of a God particle or the God Equation. They mean this also quite rationally and it is. Such a formula would be the highest law, which unites everything what can exist. Nothing would stand above this law, otherwise it would be no formula of all things. With it such a formula must describe not only physical phenomena but also mental.
Well, where would one find such a law? In the physical detail or perhaps rather in a meta-perspective? If it contains mental phenomena, but also can be recognized only by a mind, then it is also mainly about self-recognition. This means inevitably also that one cannot find such a formula by external experiments in the physical reality, but in the inner of the mind. By the mind going into a higher perspective, in which it looks at itself neutrally from the distance.
The fear of scientists to lose their reputation if they deal with mystical things is a big problem. Mystical appear to us things that we do not understand and what is unknown to us. But since the unknown tends to be mystified, it can never be recognized if one keeps everything that is mystified at a distance in the search for new knowledge.
Actually, we should do it the other way around. If something is mystical, it indicates that there is still a discovery to make. That means one can find a rational explanation where one could not find a rational explanation yet. Real science means to demystify the mystical and not to run away from it. I think I don't need a source here to prove that modern science wants to separate itself very strongly from esotericism. The problem with this is that esotericism doesn't always just mean having a mysterious woman with a crystal ball explain to you for money at the fair that you will soon find your great love. Or to believe that the earth would be flat. Esotericism can also simply mean metaphysics, self-knowledge, ethics and mind.
If there would be such a God Formula, then it would have to be metaphysical. It must not only contain physical phenomena, but also the mind, morality and recognition of the self. It would be found where everything is still mystified. Such a formula would be inevitably esoteric. It would be very difficult to explain such a formula without using esotericism. And if one would manage it somehow, then one would miss one of the most interesting syntheses.
What if the foundation of many religions is exactly this one law? What if the actual concept of God is often not meant at all like in a cult, but as a rational natural law which also describes the roots of mind and morality?
I think that this is the case. I think this very mystified formula has been recognized many times. It is known under the name Philosophers Stone.