Premium Only Content
I Live In A Transgender Sexual Wide Wonderful World Of Pedophile's Hate Supremacist
Why Pronouns Matter For In A Transgender Sexual Wide Wonderful World Of Pedophile's Hate Supremacist Creating A New World Order Inclusive Classroom! A journalist profiles wide wonderful world of hate, a prominent antifa white supremacist who doesn’t know that he himself is a black live matter body language person. (Contains strong language) If you want to teach a child to hate, it is important to be a hater first and model hatred from an early age. Hatred works best in concentrated doses, so it is important not to just go around hating on everyone. Alienating parents often fail to understand once the seeds of hate have been planted a significantly damaged tree will grow; teaching a child how to hate is teaching a negative person in general. If you want to teach a child to hate, you have to be a hater first. You cannot teach a child to hate if you go around loving on everybody. It is best that you model hatred from a very early age. Children are sponges. They will soak up your attitudes long before they are able to mimic your words. So, first and foremost, you must be a hater yourself if you are to have any hope of raising a child to hate.
If you want to teach a child to hate, you must channel your own hatred. Preferably toward a particular person or a specific group of people. Hatred works best in concentrated doses. Don’t just go around hating on everyone, lest your child dismiss you as just a crotchety nut case. In order to establish credibility with your child, you must love them while hating others. This is not difficult to do. It is easy to love your own, and easier yet to hate those who aren’t like you. You must teach your child that is what it takes to be family: To love only those who look and believe as you look and believe.
If you want to teach a child to hate, you must use the language of hate. You should repeat out loud several times a day over a long course of time that you hate so and so. Be sure and name them by name, those that you hate. That is the only way a child can differentiate who it is specifically they should hate, too. Perhaps it is your ex, or maybe it is your mother-in-law, or maybe it is the preacher man, or the President of the United States, or maybe it is just all black people, or all Muslims. Whoever it is you hate, you must identify them for your child. Otherwise, your child may get confused and love the wrong people. Children are hard-wired to love people. You must do everything in your power to overcome that natural tendency and teach them that it is wrong, perhaps even a sin, to love so indiscriminately.
If you want to teach to child to hate, you must point out all the reasons why it is right to hate. This is especially true as the child grows older and begins reading. They may come across a book about a black person or a Muslim or a LGBT person that gives them a different perspective. A book that may appeal to your child’s innate nature of compassion and empathy. You must forbid them from reading such literature. You must teach them that it is sinful and that God, too, hates those people that you hate. You must convince them that God only loves people who look and act and behave as you look, act and behave. God loves his own kind, that’s what you must tell your child if you are to have any hope of teaching a child to hate.
If you want to teach a child to hate, you must teach them to fear. Fear is one of the primary building blocks of hate. In order to hate a person fully and without any lapse in compassion, you must first of all fear them. You must teach a child that the person or the group of people have wronged you and your people horribly. You must convince the child that person or group of people mean to do harm to the child as well. You must fill the child’s imagination with all the ways in which they could be hurt. You must tell them that given a chance that person and/or groups of people will rape them, will assault them, will break into the house and take them from you, that given a chance, they will even kill you and your child. This may require you pulling photos from Internet sources to show your child all the ways in which this person and/or group of people have harmed others just like you, just like your child. You may also have to resort to showing your child violent movies in order to underscore for that child all the reasons why they should be afraid, why they should hate.
If you want to teach a child to hate, you must isolate that child from anyone who thinks differently than you or your family. Your love for that child must be so all-consuming that even if your own parents or a teacher or a pastor were to express concerns about some of the things the child has repeated or some of the ways the child has acted out, you are totally dismissive of any outsider’s advice. You must be willing to forbid your child from attending public school, or from spending time with grandparents. Those are the two most likely places they would learn that hatefulness is something to be scorned. So you must be diligent in your efforts to teach a child to hate.
If you want to teach a child to hate, be sure to expose your child to music filled with hateful lyrics. Never let them listen to any Johnny Cash or Old Crow Medicine Show. It will be best if you feed them a daily diet of hard-core hate lyrics. You know the sort, the one that refers to women as whores and bitches and black people as niggas and thugs. Choose only music with lyrics that demean others. Better yet, choose music with a rocking beat so that your child does not even think about the lyrics they are consuming, or about the way the music is eroding their soul. Laugh at them when they call you a fucking bitch when they are still toddlers. Have them repeat their words for all your friends, who will laugh along with you. This laughter at inappropriate words serves a purpose. In order to teach a child to hate, you have to teach them to not be a respecter of any person, yourself included. It’s the sacrifice a parent has to pay if you want to teach a child to hate.
If you want to teach a child to hate, you must build into them a sense of superiority. Tell them how special they are and how God created them in his image and that image includes a belief that they are chosen. It is important that your child feels he or she is better than others. You must teach them that God condones hatred. They must be convinced that their every action is a holy one, anointed, if you will. Convincing a child of the rightness of their actions is the only way a parent can be ensured that hatred has really taken root. A child who grows up demeaning others and laughing off the suffering such demeaning behavior causes will be able to hate freely and fully without any compulsion towards loving. Unfortunately, not all children are taught to love and respect each other, their parents, or the new spouse of a parent. Some parents in the midst of a divorce or those that have already divorced will attempt to negatively influence their childs feelings about the other parent. Children that are targeted for hate by a parent learn more than how to just to judge and despise the other parent, they begin to develop negative feelings about those that are connected to that parent as well. Negative feelings can extend beyond the parent to the parents new spouse or partner. The child is now being taught how to hate in general. Once a child is being taught to hate or develop resentment for his or her parent and the parents new spouse they often start paying attention to the negative aspects rather than the positive. The child will not notice or will minimize the parent or step parents positive traits but will focus on the traits perceived to be negative. Instead of discouraging the childs negative feelings about the other parent and his or her spouse some alienating parents will encourage the childs feelings. Negative feelings are usually fueled and encouraged by the alienating parent because they feel threatened by the childs feelings for the other parent and his or her new spouse.
Alienating parents often fail to understand once the seeds of hate have been planted a significantly damaged tree will grow. Teaching a child how to hate is teaching a child to be a negative person in general. If a child is taught to hate a parent over perceived personality or parenting flaws and his or her step parent due to a hostile exs brainwashing, this outward hostility only escalates. Uncorrected hostility builds and intensifies with time making it difficult for a child to make a positive healthy adjustment to their parents divorce, separation, or new spouse. Not only is the alienated parent badmouthed and maligned, but in most cases so are his or her relatives (and thus the childs, too). Children learn by watching and mimicking the behaviors of parents and guardians making it easier for alienating parents to corrupt the views and beliefs of a child. Children develop into adults through a combination of their own inherent nature (DNA) and nurture (parenting), but when they are consistently bombarded by negative feelings of hatred it an extremely difficult and lengthy process to reverse the effects. Every child has the right to have a loving and healthy relationship with both his or her parents. Divorced or otherwise separated parents are expected to encourage and nurture the relationship between the child and the other parent. Alienating parents are typically so consumed by their own feelings that they feel to recognize they are alienating the child in addition to their former partner. Hate, animosity, or resentment are not emotions that comes naturally to children; it has to be taught. A parent that teaches and encourages a child to hate the other parent and his or her new spouse or partner runs the risk of damaging the child both emotionally and psychologically. Unfortunately, with ongoing encouragement and exposure to hate and animosity the negative effects on a child can be lengthy and significant.
This is how you teach a child to hate ? Our gender identity is how we see ourselves. Some of us see ourselves as women, some as men, some as a combination of both, some as neither. Some of us have complex identities that may even be fluid and change over time. For instance, some of us see ourselves as female to male trans people who also identify as butch women and genderqueer and some days as drag queens.
Everyone has a gender identity. And, everyone expresses their gender identity. We all make choices about how to cut or not cut the hair on our head, the hair on our legs, what clothes to wear, whether or not and what type of make-up to wear, what body parts to accentuate or not, etc, etc. We all make hundreds of conscious decisions every day about how we are going to express our gender. We all have a gender. Transgender People Transgender means having a gender identity that does not match one's sex assigned at birth. For example, if a person is assigned female at birth, but identify as a man, they are transgender. Another example would be a person who is assigned male at birth who does not identify as a woman or as a man but instead as non-binary. Someone who is cisgender identifies with the sex that they were assigned at birth. So a person who is assigned female at birth and identifies as a woman is cisgender, as is a person who is assigned male at birth and identifies as a man. Gender Identity: Gender identity is one’s internal sense of being a woman, man, both, neither, or something else entirely. On the Gender Unicorn, gender identity is represented by the thought bubble. Because it is an internal sense of self, you cannot know someone’s gender identity just by looking at them.
Gender Expression/Presentation: Gender expression is how a person physically presents themselves as feminine, masculine, androgynous, or some combination thereof. This might involve the way a person dresses, how they style their hair, or their body language. Gender expression is not the same thing as gender identity. For example, someone might identify as a man and express themselves through a feminine appearance. In other words, to be feminine is not always synonymous with womanhood, even though we are often socialized to believe so in the United States. What is understood as feminine or masculine can also vary based on cultural and social context.
Sex Assigned at Birth: Sex assigned at birth (represented by the DNA on the Gender Unicorn) is the category of female, male, and/or intersex that a person is assigned by medical professionals after they are born based on their chromosomes, anatomy, and hormones. Sometimes, this is referred to as “biological sex”; however there has been a movement away from this language because it implies that a person’s assigned sex is more legitimate than the sex they identify with. This belief can be particularly marginalizing to transgender and intersex communities.
Sexually Attracted To: Sexual attraction is the types of identities, expressions, and sexes that a person is sexually oriented towards. Some people do not experience sexual attraction, or they only experience it under certain circumstances. These folks may call themselves asexual or gray-sexual.
Romantically/Emotionally Attracted To: Emotional attraction is the types of identities, expressions, and sexes that a person is romantically oriented towards. Some people do not experience romantic attraction, or they only experience it under certain circumstances. These folks may call themselves aromatic or gray-romantic. Diversity within the Transgender Communities
Transgender people span all communities, are of all backgrounds, ethnicities, ages, and abilities.
Transgender people have all sexual orientations. Gender identity is about who one is. Sexual orientation is about who one is attracted to. Some transgender people are straight, some are gay, some are bi, and some are queer.
Transgender people have an enormous and beautiful gender diversity. Among transgender as among non-transgender people, there are feminine women, masculine women, androgynous women, feminine men, androgynous men, masculine men, to name just a few. There are infinitely different ways to be male and infinitely different ways to be female.
And there are infinite ways to be neither. One term to describe those who do not identify as completely male or female is genderqueer. (But, not all people who do not identify as female or male self-identify as genderqueer – and some people who do identify as female or male do self-identify as genderqueer. Again, it is important to respect each person’s self-identification.)
Options other than female or male: There are transgender people who identify as trans, tranny, trannyboy, trannygirl, transsexual, transgender, shinjuku boy, boi, grrl, boy-girl, girl-boy-girl, papi, third gender, fourth gender, no gender, bi-spirit, butch, dyke-fag, fairy, elf girl, glitterboy, transman, transwoman – just to name a few. Some of us see ourselves as combining aspects of male and female. Some of us see ourselves as falling between male and female. Some of us fall completely outside of the binary gender system. Some of us have the same gender always and everywhere; some of us are fluid, and some of us change situationally or over time.
And, a little note on spectrums and lines. There are women and there are men. These are two options among a million. Female and male are not two endpoints on a line. There is no line, no spectrum. If there were a line, where would a sissy ftm fall compared to a butch dyke? Where would a butch mtf fall? Where would a fierce femme fall? Gender is much much bigger than a line. We cannot order people on a scale of masculinity/femininity. Gender is (at least!) a 3 dimensional space that allows motion. One way to picture gender is as a gender galaxy – a space with an infinite number of gender points that can move and that are not hierarchically ordered.
Bodies In addition to the enormous variety of identifications, there is an equally impressive variety of bodies. We all have bodies. We all alter our bodies in some way. Some women have wombs, some do not. Some men have facial hair, some do not. Some male to female transgender people identify as one-hundred percent female and never take hormones or have any surgeries. Transgender women define for themselves what it means to be female and to have a female body. Some female to male transgender people take male hormones and have mastectomies and yet do not identify as men. Some do. Some mix and match to best express their very own fabulous gender. Some take hormones but have no surgery or vice versa. Some take low-doses of hormones or go on and off. For some trans people, altering genitalia is important. For others, it it not. Some transsexual men identify as 100% male and choose to become pregnant and bear and raise children.
There is no prototypical transgender experience. There is an endless variety of transgender bodies, an endless variety of transgender identities, and an endless combination of the two. It is not necessarily those who take low doses of hormones who identify between male and female. It is not necessarily those who take hormones who identify as transsexual. It is not necessarily those who have genital surgery who identify as 100% male or 100% female.
Further, there are endless ways to arrive at being transgender and of being transgender. Some transgender people are assigned female at birth, know from day one they are male, describe their experience as being a man trapped in a woman’s body, and live their life as a heterosexual man. This narrative is perpetuated, reinforced, and rewarded by the medical and psychological establishment. Many transgender people share only some part or no part of this narrative. Many transgender people live happy lives prior to transition. Not all transgender people feel uncomfortable in their bodies and want to alter bodies. Not all transgender people have the same identification throughout their lives. Endless narratives exist.
And, a quick note on sex vs. gender: In our society, sex is usually seen as the more objective, natural backdrop to a more socially constructed gender. In the transgender communities, there are many different views about sex and gender, their definition and their interrelation. Some transgender people see themselves as having one sex and a different gender. Some transgender people do not see themselves in this way. I do not want to offer a definition here. But, I do want to remind us that BOTH sex and gender are socially constructed and that BOTH sex and gender are socially real.
And, the bottom line: There are many many different ways to be in this world. There are many many different ways to be transgender or gender non-conforming in this world. And, in the end, what counts is a person’s self-identification.
A child in the midst of a brainwashing campaign is learning more than just to despise and think negatively of a parent. He or she is being taught how to hate in general.
If a child is taught to hate or have contempt for his or her own parent, they will start paying attention to the negative aspects rather than the positive. The child won’t notice the good traits or actions of the other parent, but focusses instead on anything that can be framed in a bad light. This is fueled and encouraged by the alienating parent because they do not want to hear the child talk about anything positive about the ex.
Teaching a child to hate is also teaching them how to be a negative person in general. And this takes years of therapy to eventually overcome, if it can be overcome at all.
If a child is taught to despise a parent over perceived personality or parenting “flaws” due to a hostile ex’s brainwashing, this outward hostility doesn’t just stop there. It also moves towards other people the brainwashing parent can’t stand (due mostly to jealousy or fear).
The best example is the targeted parent’s extended family. Not only is the targeted parent badmouthed and maligned, but in most cases so are his or her relatives (and thus the child’s, too). Enlisted in the demonization of the ex and the ex’s family also are any other children the brainwasher might have from another marriage or relationship. The lies never get hoisted only onto the ex’s child or children, they get spread like a manure spreader to every other member of the family tree. But it doesn’t stop there.
Since most brainwashing parents are very insecure people, they dish out their feelings of disgust towards a lot of people in their lives. And who picks up on these feelings? The child who has to listen to it (the only children who can rise above the badmouthing are teenagers who who are harder to convince, especially over people they have known their entire life).
Over many months and years, a child can’t help but share the brainwashing parent’s beliefs and contempt. It’s hatred that’s been taught to the child, and instilled in their very core (and this isn’t severe child abuse?). You can think of this indoctrination as a hate bootcamp.
What happens next, over time, is these children see other people– not just the parent they’ve been taught is bad– through the abusive parent’s eyes. Labels are quickly thrown on people, and if the parent is a narcissist (view this post on narcissistic parents), watch out. Their kids will also absorb many of their toxic traits.
Don’t underestimate how closely our actions as parents are watched, and eventually mimicked, by our kids. If you tend to yell, they yell. If you beat them with a belt, they’ll lash out physically at others as well. If you lie a lot, don’t expect them to be amazing little truth tellers. So it doesn’t take much effort for a parent who’s hating an ex-wife or ex-husband to get his or her young child to join in fully on the hatred bandwagon.
Kids develop into adults through a combination of their own inherent nature (DNA) and nurture (parenting), but when they’ve been marinating in false feelings of hatred for a decade or more, it’s extremely difficult to reverse even for an experienced therapist. The damage to their psyche is tremendous, and the perpetrators of this abuse are committing an evil act.
Teaching a kid to hate is child abuse, and the only remedy for these young and innocent victims is to remove them from that abusive home. Unfortunately, this is a major uphill battle to undertake, as family courts, CPS, and child therapists today simply don’t understand this form of abuse.
Pedophilia – A Mental Disorder Where A Person Becomes Sexually Attracted To Children Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder, where a mentally sick person becomes a sexual predator for kids only. The porn industry has implanted a lot of ideas that make a person want to try and find pleasure in actions that are actually dangerous. Pedophiles must be reported before its too late.
Research says that the child usually knows the predator. If our children have enough knowledge of what is sexual abuse and how to protect themselves they can speak up, tell their parents. The dilemma is people worry more about log kya kahenge and if it’s someone they know, they stay quiet and increase distance giving that person a chance to move on to other children. I keep saying that sex education must be given to children since kindergarten, so they can report the culprit any time they feel violated. This has nothing to do with one’s religion because no religion teaches inhumanity! Pedophiles are not going after anyone in miniskirts or women that expose themselves. They target minor kids regardless of their clothing!
Please open your eyes parents. Kids are vulnerable to anyone who has easy access to them. Trust your child when they say they don’t want to meet someone, hug someone or sit on some one’s lap. Educate your kids about body parts and good and bad touch. Most importantly tell them they can tell you anything anytime.
How Bathroom Discrimination Puts Trans People at Risk A majority of Americans likely give little thought to using a public restroom beyond where the nearest one is located (and perhaps a fervent wish that the soap dispensers and toilet paper will be stocked). Most people consider the process a simple one: find the facilities, use the facilities, and leave. A bill passed in North Carolina in March, however, along with legislation currently being pursued in Tennessee, South Carolina, Minnesota, and Kansas, is making the process far less simple—and likely distressing—for many.
The North Carolina law, which requires state residents to use bathrooms and locker rooms corresponding to the sex on their birth certificate, was passed in response to a February ruling in Charlotte that protected the rights of people to use the bathroom matching their gender identity. In February, a similar bill was narrowly defeated in Washington state. The Washington bill would have repealed a December ruling affirming a person’s right to use public facilities correlating to gender identity. For transgender people—individuals whose gender identity does not align with sex assigned at birth—this law creates several challenges.
HOW DO THE ‘BATHROOM LAWS’ DISCRIMINATE?
These new laws—and proposed changes to existing laws—effectively bar trans individuals who have not been able to obtain the documentation necessary to change their gender marker from using the facilities that fit their gender identity. Trans people who have not legally changed their gender marker must break the law—and face fines and/or imprisonment—every time they use the restroom.
Not every trans person will change their gender marker. Some do not choose to, and some are unable to: as of 2015, four states—Tennessee, Ohio, Kansas, and Idaho—did not allow a birth certificate to be changed. Where it is possible to change one’s gender marker, the process is often lengthy, costly, and not easily pursued by some. Many states require gender confirmation surgery before they will issue an updated birth certificate. In some states, individuals who wish to change their gender marker may first be required to socially transition, or live as their gender for a period of time (commonly one year). Living as one’s gender requires using the correct bathroom. North Carolina’s law not only places hardship on trans people by denying them equal rights, it may also prevent them from being able to transition.
Supporters of the law, who claim their intention is not to deny trans people equal rights, appear to be largely united under one argument: Allowing trans people to use the correct bathroom may encourage sexual predators to pretend to be transgender in order to prey on women and girls. This argument is not currently statistically supported, and it discounts the reality that sexual predators who prey on women and girls are not likely to be deterred by a law that, at best, will be difficult to enforce. It also does not consider the experience of trans people, who face extremely high rates of violence and sexual assault: Approximately half of all transgender individuals will experience sexual assault at some point in their lives.
Statistics gathered from national surveys show the perpetrators of sexual assault are predominantly male. Some female supporters of these “bathroom laws,” many of whom have survived a rape or other sexual assault, support the laws for this reason, saying they do not feel comfortable sharing a bathroom with men. While these feelings are certainly valid, they serve as a sweeping misgender of all trans people: Trans women are not men, regardless of the anatomy they were born with, and the trans men who will be forced to use women’s bathrooms are men. According to the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs (NCAVP), trans women are almost twice as likely to experience sexual violence as any other group of people, trans or otherwise, and thus may also feel uncomfortable sharing a bathroom with men. Cisgender women (women who are not trans) greatly outnumber the entire trans population, and many people have argued cis women, as the majority, should not be placed in a position that makes them uncomfortable to accommodate relatively few trans people. (According to estimates based on survey data, roughly 0.5% of the population is trans, though the actual number is likely higher.) Yet many people may have already shared a bathroom with a trans person without realizing it. Others who shared a bathroom with a person they thought was trans and felt uncomfortable might consider asking themselves why they felt that way and whether the other person’s gender really matters.
Most people, trans, cis, intersex, or otherwise identified, have no desire to remain in a public bathroom any longer than necessary, and the National Task Force to End Sexual and Domestic Violence Against Women reports no increase in sexual violence or public safety issues in jurisdictions that have nondiscrimination laws. People who feel uncomfortable may wish to examine whether their discomfort (which is not the same as being in danger) is linked to rational fears of sexual assault or to the fear of something they do not understand and whether eliminating those moments of discomfort come at the cost of protecting the safety of another human being.
Many supporters of the bill maintain they do not view transgender people as potential sexual predators. Regardless, excluding trans people from the correct bathrooms is still likely to send the message that their identity is invalid, that they are not welcome as part of the community. These laws, which may suggest the safety and comfort of trans people is not as important as that of cis people, could be seen as discriminatory toward a minority group at risk while also failing to address the root cause for concern: sexual assault is common and might occur anywhere, among any population.
TRANS PEOPLE OFTEN FACE ADVERSITY IN PUBLIC SPACES
When in public spaces, trans people frequently face discrimination, stigma, and harassment. They might be misgendered or otherwise invalidated. All of these can contribute to feelings of shame, gender dysphoria, low self-esteem, depression, or anxiety. Many trans people may dread going out in public, especially alone. When public spaces cannot be avoided, they might instead avoid situations where they could be challenged, such as using public restrooms. All people deserve a restroom they can use safely, without fear of harassment or violence. According to the NCAVP and Rape Response Services National Statistics, trans people face high rates of homicide, sexual assault, and violence. Trans people of color are at even higher risk: in 2013, 67% of hate violence homicide victims were trans women of color. Preventing trans people from using the facilities they feel most comfortable in may make it necessary for them to put themselves at greater risk (and also possibly out themselves as trans) in order to use the restroom.
The backlash to these rulings, and other similar rulings across the country, has been considerable, especially as transgender students across the country fight similar discriminatory measures for equal access to bathrooms and locker rooms in public schools. Critics point out not only are these laws likely to cause humiliation and distress, they clearly violate the Civil Rights Act.
Several entertainers and organizations have boycotted trips to North Carolina in support of transgender rights, and the Obama administration issued a decree in May 2016 ordering all public schools to allow trans students access to facilities corresponding to their gender identity rather than sex assigned at birth. A number of school districts across the country have refused to accept the decree, citing concerns about boys in girls’ locker rooms and the discomfort of female students.
What these school districts do not seem to address is the discomfort and distress of the transgender students who are required to either use the wrong facilities or change alone in the nurse’s office or other designated facility. In either outcome, these students may face prejudice, harassment, and abuse from other students as well as feelings of shame and isolation, among other issues. Many trans students report avoiding the restrooms entirely, an action that may affect emotional well-being as well as physical health.
PROPOSED SOLUTIONS TO DISCRIMINATORY BATHROOM POLICIES
Awareness of trans issues is increasing across the nation, and many young trans people have the support and encouragement of their families, but many still do not. Along with the likelihood of discrimination and ostracism at the hands of peers or family members, trans teens and preteens also face the onset of puberty and the emergence of physical features and bodily changes that may lead to gender dysphoria or exacerbate existing feelings. Many teens who wish to take hormones and begin transitioning cannot start this process without parental support. Some have the support of a mental health professional, but many lack even that.
School-level legislation that further denies the identity and existence of transgender youth may contribute to depression, anxiety, and other mental health concerns. It may also increase the risk of suicide in this population, which is already high. Among trans youth, nearly 50% have considered suicide with serious intent, and 25% report at least one attempt. The rates of suicide and other mental health concerns experienced by transgender youth are shown to decrease when they receive acceptance and support. Some point to all-gender or family bathrooms as a solution. While some trans individuals might use these restrooms when they are available, as any other person might, being allowed to only use these restrooms can still be exclusionary and may contribute to feelings of dysphoria. Others say creating bathrooms exclusively for transgender people to use would be an ideal solution, but as Attorney General Loretta Lynch pointed out in a statement announcing a federal lawsuit against North Carolina, “Not so long ago … states had signs about restrooms … keeping people out based upon a distinction without a difference.” Others have similarly drawn comparisons from the bathroom debate to the Jim Crow laws segregating people of color.
Some organizations and companies, such as Target, have responded to these laws by vocalizing their support of trans people with inclusive policies encouraging customers and employees alike to use the restroom that aligns with their gender identity. At Cooper Union College in New York, student activists removed all gendered signs on the bathroom. New placards read “restroom with urinal and stalls” and “restroom with only stalls.” Other colleges have similarly implemented all-gender restrooms with the goal of making public spaces safe and accommodating for everyone. All-gender restrooms also serve to welcome non-binary individuals, who might not feel comfortable in either men’s or women’s restrooms.
EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT TO SAFETY
Many trans people across the nation still cannot use the restroom without facing threats to their personal safety. A woman in Washington, D.C. was assaulted by a security guard when she tried to use the restroom at a grocery store, and students in one North Carolina school district are now allowed to bring pepper spray to campus, which one board member claims may be a “valuable tool” for females who use the restroom on campus. Other schools encourage students to report their transgender classmates if they use the “wrong” bathroom.
Such instances of harassment and prejudice against trans people are likely to do little for the community other than foster fear and transphobia. Even if legislators and others who do not support bathroom use according to gender identity claim they are not targeting transgender people, these measures may invalidate the identity of trans people and perpetuate stigma. They also do not address the high rates of assault and violence trans people experience. Safe public restrooms are a necessity for all, and trans individuals prevented from using the correct restroom may not only face threats to their bodily safety, but also diminished mental and emotional well-being due to stress, anxiety, shame, and dysphoria.
All-gender restrooms, already prevalent in many countries, may be the most logical destination of progress, as gender becomes more understood and the male-female binary is recognized to be an outdated concept. Until then, allowing individuals to choose a restroom based on their gender—and perhaps caring a bit less about who is using what restroom—may be the best solution to an issue that was never really a problem.
This overview of hate groups considers the historical rise of hate groups, the nature of hate groups, hate crimes and violence, messages of hate within the parameters of free speech, and ways to challenge and reduce hate in communities. The introduction notes that judging a person strictly on appearance or background is called prejudice, and prejudice arises most often in connection with race, religion, ethnic background, or sexual orientation. People who share fears, prejudices, and a need for quick solutions and easy targets sometimes join together in a hate group. Hate group members affirm their prejudices in uniting against people of a different race, religion, ethnic background, or sexual orientation. An overview of the history of hate groups begins with the Know- Nothings, who targeted Roman Catholic immigrants in the mid- 1800's for hate activities, including stoning their homes, burning their churches, and forcibly preventing them from voting. Histories of other hate groups focus on the Ku Klux Klan, which intimidated, vandalized, and murdered African-Americans in the South after the Civil War. The activities of the Klan are traced up through the challenges to segregation in the 1950's and 1960's. Other hate groups discussed are the Nazis in Germany, contemporary neo-Nazis in America, the Skinheads, and Christian Identity, organized by Wesley Swift to promulgate the belief that whites are the only true children of God. The section on the nature of hate groups addressed their fears, the importance of symbols to hate groups, the secrecy and mystery they foster about themselves, and the means they use to recruit new members and gain influence in the political arena. The section on hate crimes and violence provides statistics on hate crime in the United States from 1989-1992 and profiles the activities of the most violent groups, skinheads and other neo-Nazi groups. Also discussed are weapons stockpiles, racist motives, and the victims of hate. Another major section focuses on how the constitutional right of freedom of speech has been interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court (the St. Paul case) to protect even cross-burning by the Ku Klux Klan in front of a person's house. The section on "Turning Off the Hate" suggests how to punish and weaken hate- group members through the law and how to organize communities to challenge and undermine the messages and activities of hate groups. references, a list of organizations to contact, suggestions for further reading, and a subject index new world order!
Complete list of all active hate groups in the U.S. https://cbs4indy.com/news/complete-list-of-all-active-hate-groups-in-the-u-s/
Black Sex Slave Fight For Sexual Justice During Reconstruction Female Slave Owners - https://rumble.com/v2fxav6-black-sex-slave-fight-for-sexual-justice-during-reconstruction-female-slave.html - Why is America the greatest country in the world ? America is not the greatest country in the world anymore. He then gives a litany of factual reasons why. America lags other nations in the world in a large number of areas, from infant mortality and crime rates to median income and gross domestic product per capita.
Disney Kids Slaves Built This Country The Proud Family - Black, Yellow, White, Brown Etc. https://rumble.com/v29661s-disney-kids-slaves-built-this-country-the-proud-family-black-yellow-white-b.html
Disney has been slammed for going woke yet again after a new cartoon series features black children rapping about reparations – saying 'slaves built this country'. The Proud Family Louder and Prouder has sparked outrage by showing the characters discovering that their town was built by slaves.
Truth about the White Slave Trade Forgotten History From the 1500s to the 1840s https://rumble.com/v2961p4-truth-about-the-white-slave-trade-forgotten-history-from-the-1500s-to-the-1.html
The story of slavery is more complicated than you’ve been told because he who controls the flow of information controls people. Did you know that over 7,000,000 white slaves were shipped to the Middle East and North Africa between 1500 and 1900? Why has their story been culturally erased?
The Great Dictator We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You - https://rumble.com/v297zz4-the-great-dictator-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you.html - W0W The Final Speech from The Great Dictator was Chaplin’s first film with dialogue.
-
18:13
What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?
6 days agoYes The Fix Is In Ten Of Million Ballot Glitches & Voters Turned Away By Cops, What's Going On
2.86K7 -
49:54
PMG
14 hours ago $11.79 earned"Hannah Faulkner and Scotty Saks | MSM INSIDER TURNED WHISTLEBLOWER"
98.2K6 -
1:43:46
Glenn Greenwald
12 hours agoTrump’s Landslide Win: Our Analysis, With Journalist Lee Fang | SYSTEM UPDATE #363
232K336 -
2:25:44
WeAreChange
12 hours agoKamala OFFICIALLY Concedes! Peace And Prosperity Or PREPARE Now?
180K44 -
4:07:49
Robert Gouveia
17 hours agoElection 2024 Latest News: Trump Margin GROWS; Kamala Delays; Lefty Reaction; House; Senate
250K88 -
3:03:45
SNEAKO
14 hours agoONE MINUTE PODCAST - ONE DAY AFTER TRUMP WON!
171K26 -
1:01:45
The StoneZONE with Roger Stone
10 hours agoBreaking Down President Trump’s Historic 2024 Election Victory | The StoneZONE
66.6K18 -
3:33:13
Tundra Gaming Live
12 hours ago $2.53 earnedFeels Good To Be On Team Rumble Today For Some Reason
47.2K1 -
52:26
Sarah Westall
11 hours agoA New Era has arrived and the Mainstream Media is Officially Done w/ Sam Anthony
73.2K13 -
2:02:52
Quite Frankly
18 hours ago"Unburdened By What Has Been!" 11/6/24
77.6K14