Ken Paxton Criticised the prosecutor in the case of Sgt. Watch:

1 year ago
312

Hello and welcome! Recently, there was a rather controversial case involving the conviction of a US army sergeant for shooting a protester during anti-police protests in Austin, Texas in 2020, and the reaction of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who criticised the prosecutor in the case for being backed by Soros.

According to , Sergeant Daniel Perry was found guilty in a Texas court of shooting an armed protester during protests in Austin in 2020. The prosecutor in charge of the case was described as Soros-backed, which led Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, to harshly criticise the jury's decision.

According to , Paxton has been quite active recently, having filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration over the $1.6 trillion spending package. Therefore, it is possible that his reaction to Sergeant Perry's conviction is related to these broader political issues.

In addition, it highlights Paxton's speech about the case, in which he stated that the right to self-defence is a divine right and that the Soros-backed prosecutor in the case is not interested in defending that right. This suggests that there is a political and ideological polarisation around the case and that the issue of self-defence is seen by some as a fundamental right that is being threatened by certain policies and political actors.

In short, the conviction of Sergeant Perry for shooting an armed protester during protests in Austin, Texas in 2020 generated a strong reaction from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who criticised the prosecutor of the case for being backed by Soros. This reflects a political and ideological polarisation around the issue of self-defence and how it is viewed by different political actors. Thank you for watching!

Loading comments...