Premium Only Content
Grumpy Homeowner's 'No Soliciting' Contract: Quirky or Effective?
Dear fellow conservatives,
I am writing to you today with a heavy heart, as once again we find ourselves silenced by Big Tech. It seems that our voices are not welcome on this platform, while Democrats and left-leaning media are free to voice their criticisms without fear of reprisal.
As you may know, our reporting focuses on free speech, and this has made us a target for those who wish to silence us. They have deliberately removed our ability to earn revenue from our content, by restricting our account from showing ads and removing the revenue that helps our fellow writers and video editors pay.
But we will not be silenced. We are dedicated to providing you with the news and opinions that mainstream media is trying to downplay. We will be relaunching our website, TheAmericanRepublik, in a few days to give you unlimited access to articles that you won't find anywhere else.
But we need your help. We rely on your support to keep our website running and to pay our team of writers and editors. Any amount of donation, no matter how small, will be greatly appreciated.
#DONATE
Click the link to DONATE: https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=9KMQQBCKSZJM2
OR VISIT our Website to DONATE: https://theamericanrepublik.com/index.php/our-purpose/
You may also check our other channels:
DailyMotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/theamericanrepublik
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2630322
Website: https://theamericanrepublik.com
Summary:
A homeowner in a quiet neighborhood went to great lengths to ensure their peace and quiet would remain undisturbed. They placed a plaque on their front door that read, "No soliciting – fundraising / salesmen / religion / politics" and even created a "contractual agreement" for anyone who dared to approach their home. The agreement, taped to the front door, was filled with sarcasm and threatened to charge unsuspecting door knockers for the time taken from the homeowner's day.
The homeowner's contract was met with amusement when it was posted on Reddit, with legal experts doubting its ability to hold up in court. Users joked about the contract's loopholes and its overall effectiveness in keeping unwanted visitors away. While it's unclear if the homeowner's attempt actually deterred anyone, it certainly sparked conversation.
-
30:24
ZeeeMedia
12 hours agoTrump Exonerated in New Epstein Drop? Intel Assets Infiltrating Media | Daily Pulse Ep 142
4.95K9 -
2:10:48
The Robert Scott Bell Show
19 hours agoDr. Andrew Wakefield, Vax Truth Vindication, Del Bigtree, An Inconvenient Study, Jeffrey Tucker, Health Freedom Hoax Exposed - The RSB Show 11-12-25
3874 -
17:22
Actual Justice Warrior
1 day agoDemocrats TURN ON Chicago Mayor
2.82K11 -
14:16
Nate The Lawyer
1 day ago $0.21 earnedSupreme Court Could Force Trump to Repay All Tariffs | Lawyer Explains
8.5K11 -
46:25
Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell
1 day agoErin West: Romance-Crypto Scam Taking Over - "Pig Butchering" Cyber Fraud Explained
7.96K1 -
1:14:05
DeVory Darkins
18 hours agoDemocrats get BAD EPSTEIN NEWS after major mistake
198K152 -
2:29:10
Badlands Media
12 hours agoDevolution Power Hour Ep. 406: Cracks in the Empire
249K27 -
2:55:16
TimcastIRL
10 hours agoNEW Epstein Emails Drop, Dems Claim TRUMP KNEW, Congress Forces Epstein Release Vote | Timcast IRL
277K132 -
1:19:53
Barry Cunningham
9 hours agoBREAKING NEWS: PRESIDENT TRUMP RE-OPENS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!
49.3K20 -
20:47
The White House
10 hours agoPresident Trump Signs Senate Amendment to H.R. 5371
44.9K35