Was Angkor Wat Built 1 MILLION YEARS Ago? Proof Of Older Civilization | Part IV | Praveen Mohan

𝗪𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁:
If you feel this work is important to be done in the current times, please help us out in producing more such content.
► PayPal :- https://paypal.me/hindutvawadi

★ Instagram :- https://instagram.com/praveenET
★ Twitter :- https://twitter.com/IamPraveenMohan
★ Email id :- phenomenaltravelvideos@gmail.com

00:00 - Introduction
00:12 - Four Tusked Elephant
01:39 - Fossil Remains
02:40 - Prehistoric Animals
03:17 - Micro Carvings
04:42 - Evolutionary Tree
07:01 - Human Fossils
08:44 - 12000 Years Old Carvings
09:52 - Age of Angkor Wat?
11:57 - Conclusion

Hey guys, today let us take a look at this ancient carving in Angkor Wat Temple that changes everything we know about Angkor Wat. Here you can see a figure riding an elephant, but look, this elephant has 4 tusks. You can see 2 tusks on the left side, and 2 tusks on the right. This is crazy, because we don't have elephants with 4 tusks today, but, 4 tusked elephants actually existed a long time ago. Experts say these 4 tusked elephants became extinct about 2 Million Years ago. And archeologists say that Angkor Wat was built just 900 years ago. If both these are true, how could the sculptors living 900 years ago, carve an animal that vanished 2 Million years ago? Think about it, if you are a sculptor carving this scene, you would have observed the animal with your own eyes before starting to carve. This is the standard procedure even today, so you can create an accurate carving of its size, and the corresponding size of human riding it, and all its features. But how did the sculptor who lived 900 years ago, see and observe an animal that became extinct 2 Million years before he lived?
Some people who believe in strict models of evolution will obviously be flustered by this carving, and dismiss it as mere imagination, or a mere exaggeration by the sculptor, but believe it or not, a 4 tusked elephant fossil has been found in the same ancient kingdom. In today's map, this fossil is found in Sulawesi of Indonesia, but during ancient times, this belonged to the same Hindu kingdom which included Cambodia and Indonesia. This 4 tusked elephant has been dated to 2 Million years old, which confirms 2 things, one: such a species actually existed in the same region where Angkor Wat temple is located. Two: these bones are actually two million years old. And this is mind-boggling, because according to mainstream theory, humans did not even exist 2 million years ago, there were no homosapiens at that time, only other apes with primitive brains existed. So why do we see a carving that shows humans and these prehistoric animals together?
Is it possible that Angkor Wat was not built 900 years ago, but built much earlier in time? Before we go into that, let me show you another strange carving. This pillar is full of micro-carvings of various animals, but here, you can see this strange animal. We can clearly see that it does not resemble any animal that exists today. It has a flat snout, strong short legs and a long pointed tail. This animal is almost identical to another extinct animal called Hyaenodon. The Hyaenodon not only had a flat snout, and a long pointed tail, it even had stripes on its body. Look at the carving, even though the entire carving is only one inch long, the sculptor has put stripes on its body. There is no doubt that this is a Hyeanadon, however, these animals also became extinct millions of years ago.

Why do we find prehistoric animals carved in Angkor Wat? If historians are accurate, how could the sculptors who lived 900 years ago have accurately seen these animals which became extinct millions of years ago, and carve them accurately with all their features?

There are only 2 possibilities unless you believe that ancient Hindus were time travelers. The first option is , these animals did not become extinct until 900 years ago, and were roaming freely alongside human beings. Imagine 4 tusked elephants and Hyanodons, the largest ones were 10 feet long, roaming around 900 years ago. If you accept this option, we have to completely revamp the current theory of animal evolution, because these animals became extinct, and slightly different animals came and went and we have to change a huge chart called evolutionary tree.
The second option is that these animals did become extinct millions of years ago, but human beings also existed millions of years ago. This means that Human beings did not evolve from great apes a few hundred thousand years ago. And we can simply accept that we have not found the fossil remains of ancient human beings. This also changes the evolutionary tree, but it keeps everything else intact, and changes only the tiny branch called humans.

#Cambodia #Hinduism #PraveenMohan