Premium Only Content
Can "Fact Checking" lead to legal liability under CDA 230 law?
It seems "fact-checking" on social media platforms like twitter and facebook has many people up in arms. They wrongfully believes these online service providers (who offer their service for free) somehow owe them constitutional first amendment rights. Well, this isn't true, and moreover, currently it is rarely possible to hold a company like these liable defamation, false light, right of publicity violations, slander, libel, or even for intellectual property infringement which occurs on their website (ex. infringing photos and videos can be subject to DMCA takedown under section 512 of the copyright laws, and if certain rules are followed, there is no liability to Youtube or other online platform. So taken together these sites enjoy large immunity from lawsuits due to CDA (Communications Decency) liability protection, and DMCA "safe harbors."
However, the issue of the day is "fact-checking." When a site like facebook or twitter engages in active patrolling of websites, review of content, and approving or disapproving (if disapproving this is done by taking the step to post or publish a "fact check label" which many users find embarrassing, but which are alleged to be undertaken to "prevent fake news" (usually political) and some argue anti-Tump in nature.
Trump himself was "fact checked" (on topic of whether mail in ballots can lead to fraud), and he got a bit upset and decided to pass an executive order asking the FTC and FCC to look deeper into the issue of whether online platforms who engage in the active content blocking should still retain liability under the CDA, or is their conduct more "editorial" in nature (more acting like a speaker or a publisher) such that they should lost their liability if they are wrong.
This is a hot issue right now. We know these sites can create their own community standards, but can they decide what is true and what is not? How do they even have the time and personal power to do that fairly across the board. Will there be college majors for fact-checking one day?
Listen to Attorney Steve® explain this interesting top on this episode of Litigation Whiteboard®
This is general legal information only and not legal advice. This is an advertisement and communication.
-
51:36
PMG
14 hours ago $1.81 earned"Hannah Faulkner and Sophia Lorey | FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATED"
11K4 -
LIVE
Flexarot
2 hours agoGetting The Bansho Fan & Crane Level Capped! (Dragon Ball Online Galaxy)
171 watching -
1:17:57
Russell Brand
3 hours agoLara Logan EXPOSES the Media's Hidden Agendas & Power Plays – SF499
109K174 -
LIVE
checkmate7_7
8 hours ago $2.71 earnedSlammin Apex clams | !GUILDED
200 watching -
LIVE
RonjnJeremy
5 hours ago $3.02 earnedClassic Wow 20th Anniversary edition HC PT 2 Seemless...Orc to troll...Still Shaman
279 watching -
1:58:24
The Charlie Kirk Show
3 hours agoMatt Gaetz Speaks + Why Dems Lose the Bathroom Battle + Shut Down The Education Cartel | 11.22.24
108K54 -
2:03:22
The Dilley Show
3 hours ago $13.09 earnedAmerica's Mayor, AG Pam Bondi and Q&A Friday! w/Author Brenden Dilley 11/22/2024
40.4K -
52:57
Grant Stinchfield
3 hours ago $3.51 earnedRepublicans are a Greater Threat To Trump's Presidency than the Democrats
23.7K8 -
1:00:50
The Dan Bongino Show
7 hours agoA Massive Shake Up On The Trump Transition (Ep. 2376) - 11/22/2024
794K2.32K -
32:04
Stephen Gardner
19 hours ago🔥This Has GONE TOO FAR! Putin Begs Trump to intervene to avoid WW3!!
40.4K64