WHO DEFINES "RIGHTS"? :The First Pillar of Localism
1 year ago
5
It is counter-intuitive, but more "rights" can mean less freedom. A big part of that is the abuse of the language of rights to advance ideas that would not be considered "rights" at all under a classical view of the concept. As courts go into overdrive granting "rights" which put positive obligations on other individuals (as opposed to simply denying the state power to act) it becomes clear the power to define rights becomes a freedom issue. Localism is all about decentralizing power. It would be incomplete if judicial power were not considered.
Link to Amazon page of book. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00B0GACAQ
Loading comments...
-
16:14
Journey on the Outside
1 year agoLocalism, a Philosophy of Government
27 -
12:52
Journey on the Outside
1 year agoBetween Anarchy and the Leviathan Central State: Localism Defended
5 -
59:39
Unsilent Podcast
5 months ago27. Unalienable: What is a "Right" Nowadays?
34 -
19:15
PeopleofArkansas
11 months ago $0.01 earnedRights and Sovereignty
81 -
44:35
Texas Outlaw
11 months agoWhat Are Rights?
215 -
13:38
Audio Andrea
11 months ago"Do You Own Yourself?" by Butler Shaffer - Violation of Your Property Law Rights
12 -
2:51
MRDeVinney
1 year agoRights are Property Rights
5 -
7:10
FatesABitch
1 year agoRebelWOO - Natural Rights vs Legal Rights
28 -
40:01
The Liberty Perspective
3 months agoNatural / Endowed by our Creator Individual Rights -vs- the collectivism of 'human rights'
2225 -
4:03
We The People - Constitutional Conventions
3 months agoUNALIENABLE RIGHTS VS INALIENABLE RIGHTS
9464