0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

Big Loss: 2A Sanctuary Backfires

1 year ago
1K

In a big loss involving a 2A sanctuary state, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has invalidated one of the most aggressive 2A sanctuary laws in the country, and the result backfires on the 2A community. Armed Attorneys Emily Taylor and Richard Hayes discuss the path moving forward when it comes to this big loss and 2A sanctuary.

Support Our 2A Community:

YouTube Channel Member: youtube.com/channel/UCE8BZHDMuyEEF-48z3ER0Pg/join

Patreon: patreon.com/ArmedAttorneys

Merchandise: https://armedattorneys.myspreadshop.com/

Subscribe Star: subscribestar.com/armedattorneys
Follow us on Twitter: @ArmedAttorneys
#2A
#ArmedAttorneys
#SelfDefense

General Information Only
The material presented is for general informational, educational, and entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to be formal legal advice or the formation of a lawyer-client relationship. You should not rely on this information or its applicability to any specific circumstances without speaking with an attorney.

All Rights Reserved
This material was produced in the United States of America. No part of this material may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews.

7 Comments

  • 0/2000
  • Love you guys! Keep it up! Regarding Missouri's attempt to give a sanctuary law with teeth... the Fed can sue but it seems to me that there is a separation between federal government law enforcement and commanding the state to enforce the federal government's edicts. Just because a state law says they won't enforce the unconstitutional federal law, that does not mean they will not prohibit federal law agency to uphold their unconstitutional law. That (seems to me) is where preemption comes in. So, a state/city officer helping the federal agency to uphold some edict is different from the federal agency bringing their own agents to come into the state to enforce their law.

    3 likes
  • besides, the DoJ doesn't make laws. that's half the problem is that these non elected bodies make judgements and people take it as "law". only congress makes law, and any "unconstitutional laws" they pass can be over ruled by SCOTUS. If SCOTUS fails to do their job and uphold individual liberty, then the people can forcefully overthrow the laws.

    3 likes
  • Oh I see. It is perfectly fine for states and localities to create "sanctuaries" for illegal immigrants and marijuana but when it comes to actual rights that are supposed to be protected by the second amendment, nope can't do that!

    3 likes
  • "The constitution says you cant hinder the Feds" The constitution also says the Feds powers are limited and shall not infringe on individual rights.

    2 likes
  • MO’s problem was that it went beyond “we’re not going to enforce fed laws” to “we will punish those who do.” They can’t do that. SCOTUS ruled that states have no obligation to enforce federal law. However, interfering with the enforcement of ANY law is literally a crime. Make. Better. Sanctuary. Laws.

    1 like
  • The second amendment was to keep the guns out of the hands of the government. Period.

    0 likes
  • Thank you for being on rumble! I refuse to use youtube ever again after they blocked my comments for saying what I think about liberal leaders. It was not racist, violent, profane or anything unsafe but it did promote freedom and our constitutional rights.

    0 likes