New Proof That Police Use Civil Forfeiture To Take From Those Who Can’t Fight Back Nassir Geiger spoke with the wrong person at the wrong time and it cost him hundreds of dollars and his car. Nassir was a victim of Philadelphia’s predatory civil forfeiture scheme that operated from a shady “courtroom” at City Hall. For years, police and prosecutors seized cash, cars and even homes and then took the property for themselves. Worse still, new data show that the police preyed on people in minority and low-income areas—in other words, people who could least afford to fight back. Undercover Police abuse of civil asset forfeiture laws has shaken our nation’s conscience. Civil forfeiture allows police to seize — and then keep or sell — any property they allege is involved in a crime. Owners need not ever be arrested or convicted of a crime for their cash, cars, or even real estate to be taken away permanently by the government. Also A officer told new world order and said if its late at night and very dark area. i pull over a van or car over. yes one time with about $40.000 in cash and some drugs too. i will ask man or woman to step out of car etc. i shot them 2 times each in head and take the money and leave area. i can make up to a millions dollars a years with money and drugs sales. very sad but true! I asked how it worked.... He said... I look for out of town lic. plate or rental cars mostly. this officer is missing now or gone out of the area. as of 2018 time and date. Every day, on average, 316 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides and suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, and police intervention. Every day, 106 people die from gun violence. 39 are murdered - 64 kill themselves - 1 is killed unintentionally - 1 dies but the intent is unknown - 115,551 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides & suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, or by police intervention. In the United States, law enforcement agencies have the power to seize the assets of those suspected of criminal activity. On its face, this seems somewhat reasonable. However, the threshold for suspicion of criminal involvement is perilously low and allows law enforcement agencies to abuse the power afforded through civil forfeiture. Many innocent citizens have had their property seized as a result, and the following instances of civil forfeiture abuse are particularly egregious. Nassir’s troubles began when he stopped to say hello to a friend at a McDonald’s in northeast Philadelphia. What Nassir didn’t know was that the friend had just been arrested for drug possession. A few minutes after ending the conversation and driving away, Nassir was pulled over. His car was searched and although no drugs or even drug residue were found, the officers seized the car and $580 cash because they found empty ziplock bags. The police gave Nassir a receipt for only $465 rather than the full amount taken and no receipt for his car. Nassir’s court-appointed attorney recommended that he take a plea deal that would result in a clear record if he paid a $200 fine and completed 20 hours of community service. This plea deal didn’t include the government taking his car or cash, so Nassir thought he would get both back. He was wrong. Instead, prosecutors filed a separate civil forfeiture action to take his property. They almost certainly would not have been able to claim his car or his cash through a criminal trial since the supposed offense carried such a light punishment. But in civil forfeiture, the property, and not the person, is on trial. Civil forfeiture is a process already prone to abuse, but in Philadelphia property owners were at an even greater disadvantage than typical. Property owners were summoned to Courtroom 478 at City Hall, but there was no judge in the room. The show was run by prosecutors, the same people who filed the forfeiture actions and who stood to benefit financially from successful forfeitures. When Nassir appeared in Courtroom 478, he was told to fill out paperwork, which he had to complete without the benefit of a court-appointed attorney. He was told to come back in another six weeks for another hearing. At that second hearing, prosecutors told Nassir he could get his car back only if he paid the $1,800 in storage fees that had been piling up. Without his car, Nassir’s 10-minute car commute turned into a 45-minute ordeal requiring two buses. He eventually bought another car, which required a new loan and cost him more to insure because it was financed. Philadelphia started to reform its abusive forfeiture system only after Nassir and other city residents filed a class action lawsuit with the Institute for Justice. The bad press from the suit (which included a segment on Last Week Tonight with John Oliver) persuaded the city to negotiate a settlement. The settlement included both mandated reforms and a fund to compensate its victims. Because Philadelphia abused many people over many years, more than 30,000 people were eligible for compensation. This made it possible for the Institute for Justice to survey victims and release a report, “Frustrating, Corrupt, Unfair: Civil Forfeiture in the Words of Its Victims,” released just this week. The major findings confirm what has long been speculated about civil forfeiture’s victims. First, it is a process that disproportionately targets disadvantaged communities. Two-thirds of survey respondents were Black, 63% earned less than $50,000 annually and 18% were unemployed. And forfeitures clustered in predominantly minority and low-income areas, like where police seized Nassir’s car and cash. Similar to how Philadelphia went after Nassir for empty baggies, law enforcement typically wasn’t using civil forfeiture to fight serious crime. Only 1 in 4 survey respondents was ever convicted of a crime. And like Nassir, many of those who were convicted pleaded to low-level offenses that were eventually scrubbed from their record. Moreover, half of all reported seizures were worth less than $600. One respondent even said police seized his crutches. The report also found that fighting civil forfeiture, difficult for anyone, was even harder for the working poor. In Philadelphia, missing a single court date often meant losing your property forever. Yet prosecutors would frequently reschedule court dates with little or no notice, forcing people to go to court a half-dozen times or more to resolve their case. This chicanery put people with less flexible work schedules at a great disadvantage. Additionally, survey respondents with less education were less likely to get their property back. This report, for the first time, paints a picture of who suffers when the scales of justice are tipped in the direction of the government. The stories in the report reinforce why civil forfeiture needs to be eliminated. If the government is going to take someone’s property, it should charge them with a crime and take that property as part of a criminal trial in which it has proven the person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Anything less violates the principles upon which the United States was built. A Chinese woman who had a bullet lodged in her head for 48 years without knowing about it has had it removed by doctors. The 62-year-old woman, identified in local media only by her surname, Zhao, had a bullet 2.5cm long and 0.5cm in diameter extracted from her head. She had gone to the doctors complaining about a chronic stuffy nose, headaches and swollen lymph nodes that had bothered her for 10 years, Want China Times reported. “I am happy that the bullet did not kill me, I am grateful to it for allowing me to live and have the opportunity of my life with my family,” said Zhao, from Liaoning province. The question of how she went 48 years without knowing about the bullet resulted in conflicting media reports. According to Want China Times, Zhao said she was hit on her right temple when she was 14 years old. At the time, she thought it was a stone. But the Shanghaiist reported the woman as saying she had been hit by a stray bullet as a girl, but only felt minor pain and decided she would live with it. The ACLU works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. Police abuse of civil asset forfeiture laws has shaken our nation’s conscience. Civil forfeiture allows police to seize — and then keep or sell — any property they allege is involved in a crime. Owners need not ever be arrested or convicted of a crime for their cash, cars, or even real estate to be taken away permanently by the government. Forfeiture was originally presented as a way to cripple large-scale criminal enterprises by diverting their resources. But today, aided by deeply flawed federal and state laws, many police departments use forfeiture to benefit their bottom lines, making seizures motivated by profit rather than crime-fighting. For people whose property has been seized through civil asset forfeiture, legally regaining such property is notoriously difficult and expensive, with costs sometimes exceeding the value of the property. With the total value of property seized increasing every year, calls for reform are growing louder, and CLRP is at the forefront of organizations seeking to rein in the practice. Civil asset forfeiture: I'm a grandmother, not a drug lord. Why can police take my property? It shouldn't take six years and the threat of legal action to be treated fairly. I hadn't been accused of any crime. I shouldn't have been punished. Six years ago, police showed up at my home at night in Massachusetts, demanded the keys to my car and threatened damage to it if I didn’t comply. They confiscated my car, but I’m not a criminal. In fact, I wasn’t even accused of a crime. So why have I been treated like one? Don’t I have any rights? Turns out I’m not alone. I’m one of countless Americans who have had their property taken away under civil asset forfeiture laws, which allow police to take property if they suspect it was used in a crime. It adds up. There are so many of us that billions of dollars of property are seized every year. Unlike so many other victims, I decided to fight the government to get my property back. My story began in March 2015 when I let my son, Trevice, borrow my car. Police in Berkshire County suspected that he was selling drugs, so they seized my car under the state’s civil asset forfeiture law, even though I had not been accused of any crime. But I had no idea that my son might have been involved in illegal activities when he was charged with a crime. Turns out, some people are above the law:Police act like laws don't apply to them because of 'qualified immunity.' They're right. At least 35 states have these kinds of laws on the books, allowing police to take, keep and profit from someone’s property without even charging them with a crime, much less convicting them of one. While civil forfeiture was originally designed to punish criminals like pirates and drug lords, it’s average Americans like me who are now frequently targeted. Police theft finances more police theft I was shocked when I learned what the government does with the property that is forfeited. Simply put, these laws are funding the police. Law enforcement agencies can keep the property, sell it and use 100% of the proceeds to pad their budgets. And there is no requirement that the value of the items seized be proportional to the crime allegedly committed. The amount of money captured is staggering. Since 2000, states and the federal government have collected at least $68.8 billion, according to an Institute for Justice report. Not surprisingly, the deck is stacked against innocent people like me. In many cases, it costs more to hire an attorney to fight the government than the forfeited property is worth. The Institute for Justice reports that “conservatively, hiring an attorney to fight a relatively simple state forfeiture case costs at least $3,000 — more than double the national median currency forfeiture.” Many Americans simply cannot afford a lawyer and can’t wade their way through the legal system and overcome the laws that make it too easy for the government to wrongfully take their property. It can truly be an overwhelming and frightening experience. That’s how I felt about my predicament. There are really no words for the stress caused by this forfeiture. But I knew I needed to fight back. Thankfully, with pro bono representation from the Goldwater Institute, I did just that. The government might have kept my property for good, but fortunately, shortly after I got legal help, Berkshire County told me last week that they would return my car to me. However, it shouldn’t have to take six years and the threat of legal action to be treated fairly. I was so fortunate to get that help — but what about all the other innocent Americans who can’t afford it? Getting my car back has a particularly personal significance: In December 2018, my son Trevice was tragically killed in an incident unrelated to the forfeiture. My car is one of the biggest items of value I had to my name, and so I had been hoping to pass it along to Trevice’s daughters. I am no drug kingpin, no crime lord. I’m an average American, fighting against a system profiting off Americans who haven’t run afoul of any law. States ought to turn their attention to doing away with this form of government theft, instead of turning a blind eye to the abuse of innocent people. Father And Son Subjected To ‘Profiling For Profit’ Stephen Skinner and Jonathon Brashear were passing through New Mexico on a road trip to Las Vegas, when they were pulled over for traveling 8 kilometers (5 mi) over the speed limit. The New Mexico state trooper who made the initial stop issued a written warning for the speed infraction and then asked for permission to search the vehicle, which was a rental car.A drug dog was called in, and the trooper dismantled parts of the vehicle during the course of the search but did not find any evidence of drugs. The trooper did note, however, the presence of nearly $17,000 in cash. The trooper detained Skinner and Brashear for two hours, referring to Skinner pejoratively by calling the 60-year-old African-American man “boy,” before telling him upon his release that “it wasn’t over yet.”Once the pair reached Albuquerque, they were pulled over again—this time for an improper lane change by the Albuquerque Police Department. This stop, however, was supported by the presence of an officer with the Department of Homeland Security, who promptly seized the cash and the car, dropping off Skinner and Brashear at the airport with no money and no means of transportation.It took two years and the intervention of the ACLU before the money was returned to Skinner and Brashear, and the incident was not the first time that Albuquerque officials faced criticism for abusing forfeiture laws: Bernalillo County and Darren White, the former sheriff, were required by a judge to pay in excess of $3 million in damages to people who had cash seized by sheriff’s deputies, as it had been determined that this money was seized with the primary intent of supplying additional funds for the police budget. Restaurateur Has One-Year-Old Baby Taken Away And $50,291 Seized In another incident involving the same Tenaha police officer and district attorney, restaurant owner Dale Agostini was pulled over on the same stretch of highway as Jennifer Boatright and Ron Henderson for the same reason: driving in the left lane without passing. After using what turned out to be an untrained police dog to sniff the vehicle, officers found over $50,000 in cash but no evidence of drugs. Agostini explained to the officers that he had family in the area and he intended to buy restaurant equipment at a local auction with the cash he was carrying. At the time, Agostini was traveling with his fiance and their one-year-old child, along with a cook who worked at Agostini’s restaurant.Agostini and the passengers were informed by Lynda K. Russell, the district attorney who had arrived on the scene, that they would face charges for money laundering and for engaging in organized criminal activity, and the baby would be turned over to Child Protective Services. The car, the $50,000, six cell phones, and an iPod were all seized.When Agostini learned that he was being jailed and his child was being taken away, he asked if he could kiss his son goodbye, a request that was summarily denied. Russell was later heard on tape coldly joking about Agostini’s request, recalling that she said, “No, kiss me.” Agostini also asked to be permitted to speak with a lawyer, only to be told such a request could not be granted until he had spent at least four hours in jail. No criminal charges were ever filed. Couple Forced To Choose Between $6,037 And Custody Of Their Children When Ron Henderson was pulled over by police in Tenaha while traveling from Houston to Linden, Texas, the officer informed him that he had been pulled over for traveling in the left lane for over half a mile without passing. During the stop, the officer claimed to smell marijuana. When asked if there were any drugs in the car, Henderson and his girlfriend, Jennifer Boatright, replied that there were not. The couple then consented to a search of the car, which yielded a glass pipe and $6,037 in cash, which the couple said they intended to use to buy a car when they arrived in Linden. No drugs of any kind were found in the vehicle.The officers escorted Boatright and Henderson to the local police station, where they met with the county’s district attorney, Lynda K. Russell. The DA informed the couple that they had two options: They could be charged with money laundering and child endangerment, or they could simply sign a waiver to turn the $6,037 over to the city. The DA informed the couple that being charged with multiple felonies would land Henderson and Boatright in jail, and Child Protective Services would take custody of their children as a result, so the couple signed the cash over to the city rather than lose their children and face felony charges.The situation experienced by Boatright and Henderson is a common one in Tenaha, as officers take full advantage of civil forfeiture laws as a means of generating revenue. After the city marshal fielded constant complaints from drivers passing through Tenaha who had endured similar circumstances, he simply complimented the officer on a job well done, saying, “Be safe, and keep up the good work.” Donald Scott Killed During Drug Raid Aimed At Seizing 250-Acre Malibu Property In October 1992, multiple law enforcement agencies executed a search warrant on the home of Donald Scott, a somewhat reclusive millionaire who had rejected repeated overtures made by federal officials to sell his property. The property, which had archaeological ties to the Chumash, was believed by federal officials to be the site of a large marijuana growing operation. During the raid on the home, Scott’s wife screamed, “Don’t shoot me! Don’t kill me!” after deputies entered the home, which led Scott, who had been sleeping, to check on the disturbance while carrying a revolver.When deputies encountered Scott, they demanded that he lower his gun. As he lowered the handgun, deputies opened fire and killed him on the spot. The deputies and other law enforcement officials then began their search of the home, leaving Scott on the floor unattended. In a recorded phone call from a neighbor that took place shortly after the shooting, the sheriff’s deputy who answered the phone told the neighbor that Scott, whose body was still lying in a pool of his own blood, was “busy.”During the subsequent search of the property, officials turned up no evidence of any marijuana on the property. While the search for marijuana was used as the rationale for the raid on Scott’s home, it was later discovered that officials from multiple law enforcement agencies had discussed seizing the home and had even researched appraisals of similar properties in the area before executing the raid. In a report written by Michael Bradbury, the District Attorney of Ventura County, it was determined that property forfeiture was indeed one of the primary motivations for the raid. Philadelphia Family Has Home Seized Due To Son’s Drug Use After their son Yianni was arrested for possession of $40 worth of heroin, Christos and Markella Sourovelis had their home seized by officials in Philadelphia, who contended that not only was Yianni in possession of heroin but that he was also selling it. The sales allegedly took place in the home or in front of the home, and though the Sourovelis family had no knowledge of the criminal activity, civil asset forfeiture laws allowed officials to evict the Sourovelis family from the home with no prior notice.Though the Sourovelis family was ultimately able to return to their home eight days after they were evicted, the district attorney’s office used the forfeited house as leverage to ensure that Yianni, who was 22 at the time, would be permanently banned from the home to prevent future drug sales. While the Sourovelises were back in the home relatively quickly, the process of resolving the case took several months of court proceedings to determine whether or not they would be able to permanently remain in their home. Traveler Has $11,000 Seized From Luggage Alleged To Smell Of Marijuana Charles Clarke was waiting to board a flight to Orlando when police approached him and questioned him about the contents of his luggage. A police dog had detected the smell of marijuana in a bag checked by Clarke, and Clarke admitted that he had smoked marijuana on the way to the airport. He also asserted to police that there was no marijuana in the bag itself.Knowing that there was nothing illegal in the bag, Clarke consented to a search of its contents. When the police asked if Clarke was carrying any cash with him, he willingly informed officers that he had $11,000 and even showed them where it was. Since he could not provide any immediate documentation proving the $11,000 was lawfully earned, the police seized the money under the assumption that it was either the profits of narcotics trafficking or was being carried with the intent of purchasing narcotics.Since Clarke was unaware that police could lawfully seize what amounted to his life savings without any tangible evidence of wrongdoing, he became combative when officers informed him they would be taking his money. In trying to keep the officers from his cash, he pushed one of them away, leading police to charge him with assault of a police officer, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest.The assault charge was immediately dismissed, but Clarke had to agree to perform community service to get the disorderly conduct and resisting arrest charges dropped. Of course, the $11,000 will remain with law enforcement unless Clarke is able to successfully contest the legality of the forfeiture. Motel Seized From Owner Due To Drug Arrests Of Patrons In 2009, Russ Caswell was informed by federal agents that his motel was being seized because the property had been used during the commission of drug crimes. The crimes cited by the federal agents occurred over a 20-year period and included 15 arrests in total, but all of the arrests were of patrons of the motel, not of Caswell or any of his employees. So though Caswell and his staff had actually helped police in securing many of these arrests and had not been even remotely implicated in any criminal activity, the federal agents still sought to seize his property.Even though the case seemed “ludicrous” to Caswell, he was still forced to endure three years of litigation in which the government tried to permanently seize his property, which he owned outright and was worth in excess of $1 million. He paid $60,000 to fight the suit, and even then, Caswell had to rely on pro bono work from an attorney to continue to plead his case. After three years of court battles, the forfeiture case was ultimately dismissed. However, as is true of all forfeiture cases, the onus was on Caswell to prove his innocence rather than on the government to prove his guilt. Driver Loses $3,500 For ‘Looking Like A Drug Dealer’ In a case highlighted in an NAACP letter to Congress, an African-American man was pulled over traveling from Virginia to Delaware, allegedly for having a taillight out. The taillight had actually been functioning properly, but this ploy allowed the officer to size up the driver for a potential search and seizure through the use of civil asset forfeiture. The driver, according to the officer, “looked like a drug dealer,” which was apparently reason enough for the officer to enlist a drug-sniffing dog to search the man’s car.After the search did not turn up any drugs or any other evidence of illegal activity, the officer asked if the driver was carrying any guns, drugs, or money. Though the driver had no firearms and no drugs, he did state that he had $3,500 in cash. The officer promptly seized the driver’s cash. Despite not finding any evidence that could support an arrest, they said that the money could only be the profits of drug dealing and was thus subject to legal seizure under civil forfeiture laws. The driver was never charged with any crime. Philadelphia Couple’s Home Seized After Son Arrested For Marijuana In 2012, Leon and Mary Adams had their property seized because their son, Leon Jr., had allegedly been selling marijuana from their front porch without their knowledge. Though Leon Jr. was indeed charged with a crime, he was alleged to have sold very small quantities—a “few $20 marijuana deals”—and the couple had nothing to do with the criminal activity. Leon Jr. had not yet been convicted of the criminal activity when the police asserted that they would be seizing the property that had been the home of Leon and Mary Adams since 1966.According to the Philadelphia Police Department, Leon Jr. had sold $20 worth of marijuana to a police informant on multiple occasions. After the first sale, the informant went to the porch of the Adams home on two more occasions to again buy $20 worth of marijuana. With evidence in the form of marked bills and the ostensible testimony of the informant, Philadelphia Police used a SWAT team in riot gear to break down the door of the home and arrest Leon Jr. A month later, Leon and Mary Adams were informed that in addition to their son being in jail while awaiting trial, their home would also be seized under civil forfeiture laws.The profits from the sale of the seized home would be split between the police and the district attorney’s office after it was sold at auction. The only reason police didn’t evict Leon and Mary Adams before they could challenge the civil forfeiture claim was that the elder Leon Adams was enduring a host of health problems and was undergoing treatment for pancreatic cancer.The forfeiture case is still pending. During an early court appearance, the assistant district attorney assigned to the Adams case brought the wrong folder to court, causing a further delay in the process. DEA Agents Seize $16,000 From Amtrak Traveler After saving up enough money to pursue a career in the music industry, Joseph Rivers, 22, bought a one-way train ticket to Los Angeles. For DEA agents, that act alone—along with the fact that he was traveling with such a large amount of cash—was enough to suspect that Rivers was involved in drug trafficking or some other “narcotic activity.”Other passengers traveling on the Amtrak train noted that Rivers, a young African-American man, was the only passenger to be singled out by the DEA. His attorney, Michael Pancer, suggested Rivers’s race may have played a role, as he was the only black passenger on his section of the train.During the search and subsequent seizure of his cash, Rivers has said that he was completely cooperative and even allowed the DEA agents to contact his mother to corroborate his story. Rivers pleaded with agents that he would be penniless upon his arrival in California with no means of survival and no way of returning home. According to Rivers, “[The DEA agents] informed me that it was my responsibility to figure out how I was going to do that.”Rivers was not charged with any crime, and there is no indication that he ever will be, but the DEA was still able to legally seize all of the $16,000 he carried. The DEA’s explanation for the seizure was particularly troubling: “We don’t have to prove that the person is guilty. It’s that the money is presumed to be guilty.” Your Right to Remain Silent A New Answer to an Old Question - Do Not Talk ? O.K. Don't Talk to the Police Ever! Fifth Amendment "Right To Remain Silent," When a witness is summoned to testify before a grand jury or at a judicial or legislative proceeding, the lawyer for the witness frequently concludes that it may be in the client's best interest to assert the Fifth Amendment "right to remain silent," at least with respect to certain topics. The lawyer will often give the witness a card to read aloud when asserting that privilege. But precisely what words should the lawyer advise the client to read when invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege? For more than 100 years, lawyers have shown surprisingly little imagination or ingenuity, advising their clients to state in almost exactly these words: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer on the grounds that it may tend to incriminate me." This article explains why that unfortunate language is never in the best interests of the witness, and why it naturally tends to sound to most listeners as if the witness is somehow admitting that he cannot tell the truth without confessing that he is guilty of some crime. The article also points out that this archaic invocation is not required by either the language or the theory of the Fifth Amendment, nor by the most recent controlling Supreme Court precedents. The article concludes with a suggestion for an entirely new formulation for invoking the privilege, one which gives greater protection to the rights of the witness and also more faithfully captures what the Supreme Court of the United States has written about the nature of this precious constitutional privilege. Keywords: Fifth Amendment, self-incrimination, right to remain silent. Why You Should NEVER Talk to the Police. Period. “The police are at my door. They want to talk to me. They told me I am not a suspect. I did absolutely nothing wrong. I have nothing to worry about. They can’t arrest me or do any harm to me if I did nothing wrong, right?” Wrong. “But I committed no crime. Took nobody’s life. I didn’t even see anything criminal happen. I don’t know anyone who may have been there. I was 173 miles away when it happened. I don’t know any of the facts except from what others told me. I cannot possible be harmed, right?!” Again, I am sorry to tell you, but you’re wrong. What people do not realize is what they don’t know actually can hurt them. If you don’t believe me, listen to the words of former United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, “[A]ny lawyer worth his [or her] salt will tell the [client] in no uncertain terms to make no statement to the police under any circumstances.” Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949) (emphasis added). Let us look at the situation a little more closely. If the police ever ask you to come in to the station “just to chat” or are stopping by “because they only have a couple questions for you” — that means one of two things: You are a suspect; You are a possible suspect. Does that clear the picture up? I sure hope so. There is absolutely no reason for the police to want to have any discussion with you unless they know something that you (probably) don’t. May be your name was mentioned during a discussion with another potential suspect, or perhaps someone is trying to frame you, or, worse yet, you look like the person who was present on the scene and an eyewitness made a mistake in identity. This kind of thing happens all the time. And innocent people end up in custody as a result. There is no reason to talk to the police especially if you’re innocent. There is no reason to talk to the police; especially if you’re innocent. Here are the top ten reasons why you should not talk to the police:* REASON #1: Talking to the police CANNOT and WILL NOT help you. Talking to the police cannot make any difference. Nobody can “talk their way out of” an arrest. No matter how “savvy” or intelligent you think you might be, you will not convince them that you are innocent. And any ‘good’ statements that may help you that you tell the police cannot be introduced into evidence because of hearsay rules. It’s a lose-lose situation; don’t talk to the police. REASON #2: Even if you’re guilty, and you want to confess and get it off your chest, you still shouldn’t talk to the police. There is plenty of time to confess and admit guilt later. Why rush the inevitable? First, hire an attorney. Let them do their work, and may be you will win your case. It is much harder to win when there is a confession. For example, do you know what happens if the cop cannot be located and there is no confession? The case gets dismissed! (It’s not a universal rule, but it’s more common than you might think.) Don’t talk to the police. REASON #3: Even if you are innocent, it’s easy to tell some little white lie in the course of a statement. When people assert their innocence, they sometimes exaggerate their statements and tell a little white lie on accident. That same lie could be later used to destroy your credibility at trial. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #4: Even if you are innocent, and you only tell the truth, and you don’t tell any little white lies, it is possible to give the police some detail of information that can be used to convict you. If you make any statement — it could later be used against. E.g. “I did not kill the guy. I was not around the area when it happened. I don’t have a gun. I never owned a gun. I never liked the guy, but, hell, who did?” Bingo. We just found your incriminating statement: “I never liked the guy.” Don’t talk to the police. REASON #5: Even if you were innocent, and you only tell the truth, and you don’t tell any little white lies, and you don’t give the police any information that can be used against you to prove motive or opportunity, you still should not talk to the police because the possibility that the police might not recall your statement with 100% accuracy. Nobody has a perfect memory. That includes law enforcement. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #6: Even if you’re innocent, and you only tell the truth, and your entire statement is videotaped so that the police don’t have to rely on their memory, an innocent person can still make some innocent assumption about a fact or state some detail about the case they overheard on the way to the police station, and the police will assume that they only way the suspect could have known that fact or that detail was if he was, in fact, guilty. If you overhear a fact from someone else and later adopt it as your own, it can be used to crucify you at trial. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #7: Even if you’re innocent, and you only tell the truth in your statement, and you give the police no information that can be used against you, and the whole statement is videotaped, a suspect’s answers can still be used against him if the police (through no fault of their own) have any evidence that any of the suspect’s statements are false (even if they are really true). Honest mistakes by witnesses can land you in jail. Why take the risk? Don’t talk to the police. REASON #8: The police do not have authority to make deals or grant a suspect leniency in exchange for getting as statement. Law enforcement personnel do not have authority to make deals, grant you immunity, or negotiate plea agreements. The only entity with that authority is the County or Commonwealth Attorney in state court and the U.S. Attorney in federal court. The officers will tell you they do, but they are lying. They have a carte blanche to lie. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #9: Even if a suspect is guilty, and wants to confess, there may be mitigating factors which justify a lesser charge. You may be accused of committing one offense when, in fact, you are guilty of a lesser offense. By confessing to the higher offense, you are throwing away bargaining chips. The prosecutor can try the case with your confession to the higher offense. There is no reason to confess. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #10: Even for a completely honest and innocent person, it is difficult to tell the same story twice in exactly the same way. If trial is the first time you tell your story, then there is no other statement by you to contradict any of your facts. However, if you have told your story twice, once at trial, and once to the police, you are probably going to mess some facts up. It’s human nature. A good cross examination by a prosecutor will tear you apart. Don’t talk to the police. *Taken from a video lecture by Professor Dwayne. The video is reproduced in full below. https://rumble.com/v297voe-your-right-to-remain-silent-a-new-answer-to-an-old-question-do-not-talk-o.k.html Many years ago, in the then-peaceful suburbs of where we lived on Long Island, NY, my across-the-street neighbor, an older woman, came running to our house in a panic, saying that her house had been robbed! My father — meaning well — impulsively then ran to & and inside her house, to, I guess, see what he could see. In the meantime, my mother called the local police, who showed up at the neighbor’s house minutes later — and promptly ARRESTED MY FATHER. We (my mother and the neighbor, and certainly my father) tried to explain to the police that my father was innocent. But it was only HOURS LATER that the police released (and did not charge) my father. During those few hours — as well as afterward — my mother, my sister, and I and the neighbor, were debating whether we should files charges against the police for a wrongful arrest/detainment of my father — but we ultimately decided against it, and opted for diplomacy — because, as we reasoned, (a) the police may have had what they had thought was a VALID REASON to arrest my father (although they COULD HAVE come over to OUR house to talk to the neighbor — which they did NOT do!), and (b) it would be better to maintain GOOD RELATIONS with the police than have them “hold a grudge” against us. In hindsight, apparently “(b)” was a good decision.

Speaker Pelosi's said her laptop had over 18,000+ documents and over 368,000+ pages of emails that were uploaded to who? or hacked by who? before shy got back to her office during the Jan. 6 insurrection. Riley June Williams, 22 was found guilty of six federal counts in November of 2022. Democrats woman of house wearing all white at state of the new world order speech rather than Republicans with red shoe lace who are the true saviors of the new world order and other civil liberties. A laptop stolen from the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during the U.S. Capitol attack has not been recovered from the home or car of a Pennsylvania woman accused of helping steal it, the woman’s lawyer said Tuesday. Yes its still missing or sold to who ? That is how it is going to go down, the timeline might be a bit off. You will have one world faith, which is what the ecumenical movement is about. One world government, and all under control of the New World Order by July 4th 2026 on this the day of America’s up coming 250nd year of independence, unveiled a new updated flag which better reflects the nation in its present form, signaling the aspirations it has for its ever bright future. Confiscating Entire Wealth of All The Billionaires and Kill Them and Family Too! There are 724 (billionaires) in the U.S., and more overseas according to the 2021 Forbes billionaires list, released in April,” the Journal reports. “At that point their collective net worth was $4.4 trillion, although that figure has presumably since risen along with the stock market. So Per 60% Death taxes are taxes imposed by the federal and some state governments on someone's estate upon their death - Death taxes are also called death duties, estate taxes, or inheritance taxes. After getting the money maybe in 20 weeks or so - Own Government plan's are to kill rest of the family member for more estate taxes, or inheritance taxes. Also Government Plan's are to Kill and or Black Mail for Lot's of Money All Epstein’s and Maxwell Private Pedophile Islands Visitor Log's including video equipment and sex tape's of rich people and with DNA Sample Testing and secret video tapes and missing body in underground lairs and a bizarre teen sex temple from Pedophile Islands Guestbook and Visitor List They Do Not Want You to See Ever! Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell Said We Have 1,000's Video Tape's and have 1,000 Forensic DNA Test's, Blood Test's and Hair Sample's DNA Testing all ready Done Now. Podesta’s email account was hijacked and the hackers took his entire private library of emails. This sucked hard for Podesta because the hackers had tons of high ranking-sensitive information. From October through November 20,000+ pages of emails were uploaded to wiki-leaks. Hillary Clinton at a campaign event last month. Cybersecurity experts said that her private email account from when she was secretary of state was probably hacked 38,000+ pages of emails were uploaded Benghazi panel had discovered that Clinton exclusively used her own private pedophile email server rather than a government-issued one throughout her time as Secretary of State, and that her aides took no action to preserve emails sent or received from her personal accounts as required by law. Hunter Biden when he came into a repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware, the Bidens' hometown, and handed over three laptops After two years of scrutiny, the laptop has produced mountains of material about Hunter Biden's personal struggles, and his foreign business ventures in Ukraine and with China. It has produced direct evidence President Biden benefited from his son's business dealings. Similar incidents involving Hunter Biden's use of drugs and hiring of prostitutes featured on his laptop that was exposed just before the US elections by the New York Post. Vatican private pedophile trial for sex abuse of 10,000+ kids in pope's youth seminary opens scandal is particularly grave because the true abuse and yes allegedly occurred within Vatican City and All over the World, and the true allegations were known since at least 1960s Thru 2021 pedophile's but were covered up by the Vatican and other church authorities until the victim and his roommate went public. Their stories greatly undermined Pope Francis’ pledges of “zero tolerance” for abuse because the alleged crimes occurred in his own backyard and had gone unpunished for years. The report also criticized the way the media reported sexual crimes, stating that the New World Order media reported on sexual abuse allegations against Catholic clergy but ignored such allegations against Protestant churches and Jehovah's Witnesses. Stephen Joseph Rossetti, a Catholic priest, reported that the frequency of pedophilia amongst the Catholic clergy is no higher than among general population, and a Catholic priest is no more likely to be a pedophile than an average male. Rifles, Humvees and millions of rounds of ammo etc. The Taliban celebrate their new American arsenal. Between 2013 and 2016, Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States with Congress Help gave Afghan forces more than 600,000 light weapons, such as M16 and M4 rifles and nearly 80,000 vehicles, as well as night vision goggles, radios and more, according to a 2017 Government Accountability Office report. Even more recently, the US Defense Department supplied the Afghan military with 7,000 machine guns, 4,700 Humvees and more than 20,000 grenades between 2017 and 2019, a report from the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction found. The GAO and the special inspector general removed these reports at the request of the State Department to protect any Afghans identified within. U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. The two mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is not very safe and very bad at preventing serious or fatal cases of COVID-19. The risk of serious side effects associated with these vaccines is very large. 76,253 Dead 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) database of adverse drug reactions is now reporting 46,618 deaths and 4,682,268 injuries following COVID-19 vaccines. In the United States, the Vaccine Adverse Events Recording System (VAERS) is now reporting 29,635 deaths and 1,350,950 injuries following COVID-19 vaccines. https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed There have now been more deaths and vaccine side effects reported during the past 20 months to VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines than there has been for the entire previous 30 years for all FDA-approved vaccines before the Emergency Use Authorization of the COVID-19 shots in December of 2020. (833,968 cases, 9,279 deaths. There is an untold story about billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates that the world desperately needs to hear, especially in the era of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccinations.” nearly two in five people believe that the coronavirus pandemic is a “depopulation tactic ? As the number of true conspiracy theories now regarding the coronavirus or COVID-19/21 outbreak continues to rise in the US population, a new poll has discovered that almost two in five people in the US believe the deadly pandemic is a 'depopulation tactic'. Around 39 percent of the adults around the nation agreed that the COVID-19 was intentionally released as a part of a depopulation plan orchestrated by the UN or the New World Order. Bye, bye, baby? Birthrates are declining globally – here's why it matters. The COVID-19 pandemic is serving as a modifier – but not in the way commentators and comedians suggested when lockdowns began. Remember all the jokes about people being stuck at home leading to a baby boom? As the data rolls in, its clear that in many countries, the opposite has occurred. Most children these days are wanted or planned children, especially in the developed world. Deciding to have a baby is contingent on being optimistic about the future – and optimism is difficult to muster during a global pandemic. First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists And I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews And I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me. The 21 Points of Manifesto of the New World Order and Plan to Control and Enslave the World by July 4th 2026 on this the day of Old America’s up coming 250nd year of independence. One world government, and all under control of the New World Order and to unveiled a new updated flag which better reflects the nation in its present form, signaling the aspirations it has for its ever bright future. 1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 3. Abolition of all right of inheritance. 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. 8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. 9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country. 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. 11. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 12. Guide reproduction wisely—improving fitness and diversity. 13. Unite humanity with a living new language. 14. Rule Passion—Faith—Tradition—and all things with tempered reason. 15. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 16. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 17. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 18. Balance personal rights with social duties. 19. Prize truth—beauty—love—seeking harmony with the infinite. 20. Be not a cancer on the earth—Leave room for nature—Leave room for nature. 21. What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Secret societies have been in existence all throughout history. Elites, crazed by power and money, band together to exert maximum control over the masses. In 2026 their influence is greater than ever – their tentacles reaching all aspects of our daily life through control of the economy, religion, education and politics. While the world may seem chaotic and confusing to those who are not in the know, those who have studied the history of international secret societies are blessed with an understanding of the evil agenda pushed by the cabal. Why is it a blessing to understand the evil that is in our midst? Wouldn’t it be better to be naïve and live with our heads in the sand? No. It is only through understanding this evil that we can fight back and reject the New World Order they are working towards.

Per U.S.A. Government DOA-DOJ-FBI-CIA-Etc. Everyone In U.S.A. All Person And Or America Citizens Right Now Today Is A Criminal As of Oct 2023 Need To Be In Jail Or Pay $$$ Fines Now. Per all federal and local police and all government agencies. All The America People Break The Law's Average 3 Times Everyday with A Average Fine of $512 dollars a day. it add up to $512 x 365 days in a year add up to $186,880 Dollars per year in fines per every person alive today right now. also federal and local agencies issue an average of 27 rules for every law over the past decade. However, the rules issued in a given year are typically not substantively related to the current year’s laws, as agency output represents ongoing implementation of earlier legislation. According to a 2020 article, the more than 300,000+ laws and regulatory crimes on the federal law books serve little purpose other than inviting arbitrary enforcement by providing prosecutors the tools to charge nearly anyone every day for your life with violating some long-forgotten regulation or law and to pay the fines now or go to jail for everyone in the U.S.A.. Government Every Man, Women, & Child Is A Criminal & Need 2 Go To Jail for life. A cell phone app is a smartphone add-on that performs functions other than making a phone call, ranging from GPS map to games to medical monitoring and speeding in your car. So per GPS mapping every street and speed limits of all roads in all town and roads every place of earth we can see you every move and every person driving or moving around town by car or truck... so if you drive 30 mile per hour in a 25 miles per hour zone you get a ticket for speeding etc. your cell phone will tell your speed everyday and night too. most people will get 3-5 tickets a day. you are your brothers keeper and every cell phone in car will get a ticket for speeding and you pay your fine or go to jail. So Per U.S.A. Government Every Man, Women, & Child Confiscation of all property and all assets you have to pay all tickets and all fines every day of your life. P.S. Remember All The America People Break The Law's Average 3 Times Everyday with A Average Fine of $512 dollars a day. So per U.S.A. new land reform and confiscation all personal property to pay all new court fines was not only an economic or administrative process of taking and redistributing deeds or legal ownership of land. It was a two party system's republican and democratic parties -led to new mass movement which turned peasants (its you baby) into active participants and which pushed for political and ideological change beyond the immediate economic question of all land confiscation and ownership rights are gone. If you have a home the state will take it for the fines you own to the state now. you can stay in your old home as a renter with 3 other family to move in with you to help the homeless problem. In order for housing to be considered affordable, a family should not spend more than 30% of its income on rent. Thus, a working family needs to earn nearly $42 per hour – or roughly $87,000 per year – to afford the average rent in Los Angeles. In Los Angeles, the median rent is 46.7% or nearly half of median income. 509,404 low-income renter households in the county do not have access to an affordable home. As of July 10, 2023 - While some states are on a schedule for annual increases to eventually reach $15 an hour, 12 states still adhere to the federal minimum. Although the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 has not budged since 2009, more than 20 states have provided additional increases in 2023. Why Minimum Wage Isn’t Enough Picture this: Jane Doe is a single adult working a full-time (40 hours per week) minimum wage job. Jane wants to rent a modest one-bedroom apartment. No matter where Jane lives in America, and regardless of whether Jane lives in a state with a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage, Jane will be unable to do so. Why? Because there’s no state in America in which a person working a full-time job that pays minimum wage can afford to rent a one-bedroom apartment. This shocking fact comes from the National Low Income Housing Coalition’s recently-released report, “Out of Reach 2015.” The report analyzes the Department of Housing and urban Development’s estimated Fair Market Rent (FMR)—which is defined as the 40th percentile of rents for typical, non-substandard rental units, including the cost of utilities—in relation to wages earned in each state. The report estimates the earning necessary to rent one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments without spending more than 30 percent of a household’s total income on rent. Let’s look at how the information presented in this report might impact Jane Doe’s apartment search: To rent a one-bedroom FMR apartment, Jane would need to earn $15.50 per hour. This is more than twice the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. Even the proposed federal minimum wage of $10.10 per hour would be insufficient for Jane to rent an apartment. To a rent a two-bedroom FMR apartment, Jane would need to earn $19.35 per hour. If Jane lives in Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Virginia, or Washington, she’ll need to make over $20 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment. The average national FMR price for a one-bedroom apartment is $806 per month. That means Jane would need to work 86 hours per week in her minimum wage job to afford the cost of rent. Unfortunately for Jane, findings in the “Out of Reach” report show that her situation is unlikely to improve any time soon. Nationally, rents are rising, wages are lagging behind, and there is a limited supply of affordable housing. With all these barriers to renting an apartment, it’s easy to see how Jane might end up doubled-up with family or friends, severely burdened by the cost of her housing, or homeless. Unless we take action to increase the supply of affordable housing units (Out of Reach suggests America needs 26.1 million more units to meet demand), increase the minimum wage, and decrease the cost of rent, Jane won’t ever be able to afford her apartment. U.S.A. Government Every Man, Women, Child Is A Criminal Need Two Go To Jail Confiscation All Personal Property And Land Etc. The Confiscation Acts of 1861 and 1862 and Today Soon 2024 As the Senate met in extraordinary session from July 4 to August 6, 1861, one of the wartime measures it considered was the Confiscation Act, designed to allow the federal government to seize property, including slave property, being used to support the Confederate rebellion. The Senate passed the final bill on August 5, 1861, by a vote 24 to 11, and it was signed into law by President Lincoln the next day. Although this bill had symbolic importance, it had little effect on the rebellion or wartime negotiations. When Congress again convened in December, Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, proposed a more comprehensive confiscation bill. On December 2, 1861, Trumbull introduced the Confiscation Act of 1862 to allow for seizure of all Confederate property, whether or not it had been used to support the rebellion. Before long, however, Trumbull's bill stalled due to ideological differences over the issue of confiscation. Radical Republicans called for a vigorous confiscation bill to seize property and free slaves, but more conservative members worried about expanding the reach of the federal government while denying property owners their constitutional rights. Early in 1862, a group of moderate senators, led by Ohio’s John Sherman, produced a compromise bill that authorized the federal government to free slaves in conquered rebel territory and prohibited the return of fugitive slaves, while allowing for confiscation of Confederate property through court action. It also allowed the Union army to recruit African American soldiers. Although more aggressive than the first act, the Confiscation Act of 1862 also lacked enforcement capabilities. Loosely enforced by the Lincoln administration, the law was actively undermined by Lincoln’s successor, President Andrew Johnson. Tracking Everything Everywhere All at Once Cell phone tracking enables you to follow the movements of a person of interest. You can track someone’s location without them knowing by installing a spy app secretly on their target phone. These phone spying apps track almost all targeted phone activities like Calls, SMS messages, Google map’s location, Web history, Social Media sites like Facebook, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Telegram, etc. ... mSpy is a GPS tracker that allows you to remotely track any user’s phone activity. Most Common Reasons Why People Go to Jail Have you ever wondered what are the common reasons people go to jail? What sort of crime do people have to commit to have to spend time behind bars? The truth is that many people end up in jail because they don’t have enough money to pay their bail bond, which implies they will be released, as long as they promise to appear in court when they are required to. If they can’t pay, they have no choice but to go to jail, until they find a reputable criminal lawyer and appear before court. Other people have to go to jail because they don’t know their legal rights, and could not benefit from a fair trial. But what do people do to end up in such a situation? Here is a list of the most common reasons to go to jail: Reason #1: Drug offences One of the most common reasons to go to jail is because of drug-related offences. Criminal organizations make a lot of money by producing and selling illegal drugs. The people who work for these organizations can also make some money by selling drugs, but if they get caught, they can end up in jail. Possessing and using illegal drugs is also punishable by law. Even though using medical marijuana is now legal in Canada, growing large amounts of this drug at home is also considered a drug-related offence. Reason #2: Offences against the justice system There are people who go to jail because they have committed offences against the justice system. This can take many forms: perjury, breach of bail, breach of probation, and failure to attend court mandated programs. Obstructing a police officer, or impersonating a police officer are also considered offences against the justice system. People who commit an offence against the justice system usually have been charged for another crime, and got into some more trouble by refusing to obey the law. Reason #3: Traffic offences Traffic offenses are common reasons for incarceration. People usually don’t go to jail because they ran a red light. If they repeatedly get caught violating traffic laws, they could face some serious consequences. Driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, committing a hit-and-run, and driving dangerously or carelessly are all considered traffic offences. People who commit these offences could get their driving license suspended, have to pay heavy fines, get a criminal record, and even serve some time in jail. Reason #4: Assault Assault is another reason why people can go to jail. It includes any situation where force is applied intentionally to cause harm to someone. But you don’t have to physically hurt someone to be charged with assault: simply verbally threatening someone can be considered a violent crime. Holding a weapon to threaten someone, even if it isn’t a real weapon, can also be considered assault. Someone found guilty of assault, even if it seemed like a minor offence, could end up with a criminal record and serve some time in jail. Reason #5: Sexual assault A sexual assault is a type of assault that was committed for sexual purposes. Any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without consent can be considered sexual assault. This includes rape, attempted rape, or any form of unwanted physical contact. Someone who is found guilty of sexual assault can end up with a criminal record that will follow them throughout their life, and they can also serve time in jail. Reason #6: Theft Theft is another common reason why people go to jail. It can include shoplifting, retail theft, workplace-related theft, breaking and entering, or any situation where someone is taking and moving someone else’s property without their permission. Robbery, which is the act of taking someone else’s possession through violence or intimidation, is a serious criminal offence. Serious charges of theft or robbery can send someone in jail. The value of what was stolen determines how much time the person who committed the crime will serve behind bars. Reason #7: Fraud Fraud is a form of theft. It includes credit card fraud, social assistance fraud, business fraud, investment scams, and, of course, internet fraud. Cybercriminals are using different types of online fraud setups to steal money from people. Identity theft is a type of fraud that happens frequently through the internet. Once again, depending on the amount of money that was stolen, someone recognized guilty of a fraud can serve a few years in jail. Reason #8: Homicide Finally, anyone who is found guilty of committing a murder will be taken to jail, and will probably stay in jail for a long time. Homicide is one of the worst crimes that can be committed, but there are a number of other offences that could send someone in jail. There are even people who go to jail because they have been charged with a crime they did not commit. Wrongful conviction happens when an innocent person goes to jail while a criminal goes free. Reason #9: Just Being Alive Is A Crime 300,000+ laws and regulatory crimes on the federal law books serve little purpose other than inviting arbitrary enforcement by providing prosecutors the tools to charge nearly anyone every day for your life with violating some long-forgotten regulation or law. Many people are arrested for breaking the law or performing illegal activities every single day. Those who are stopped by policeman, turned in by their neighbors, or simply stumble into trouble find themselves facing arrest, fines, and even prison time after they commit crimes. Crimes that are minor will subject individuals to pay hefty fines, but as the crimes rise in severity, so does the punishment. When people are first arrested, they may need to spend time behind bars until they are bailed out. Bail bonds in Orlando help many people meet bail when they are first arrested. There are a few common reasons why people get arrested in the United States. Larceny Larceny, one of the most common crimes, is when someone takes or removes another person's personal property without their permission. This is also known as theft. Typically, this is a nonviolent crime unless it is accompanied by another charge indicting assault. It is also often associated with the crime of trespassing or even breaking and entering. This crime can include taking money, labor, or possessions. This is typically classified as a misdemeanor offense, which means that the guilty will not have to spend time behind bars. Instead, they will have to pay a criminal fine. If they have stolen items of high value, they may end up spending less than a year in jail, as determined by the judge during sentencing. Some cases involving theft may even be less severe, only resulting in citations or a small fine. Drug Abuse Violations This crime is described as the violation of laws involving the production, distribution, and use of illegal substances. This can also include the possession of drug equipment or devices used to prepare these substances or to practice them. Many people are arrested for being under the influence of drugs, possessing drugs at the time of the arrest, selling drugs to others, or even manufacturing the drugs themselves. Commonly used drugs are cocaine, heroin, morphine, and amphetamines. In certain states, recreational marijuana is also a banned drug that you can be arrested for using or possessing. The penalties for being found guilty of drug abuse violations involve a variety of consequences. They can spend time in jail or even federal prison. When the crime is minor, they may also have to face fines, community service, or probation. House arrest is also common to ensure that they are not a threat to the community if they have been found as a danger possessing or selling drugs. The penalties are determined by the substance, the amount of the substance, the drug-related activity, and also if the person has a prior criminal record or not. Driving Under the Influence This common offense is when someone is caught driving their vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs. When the driver is rendered incapable of operating their vehicle, they can be charged with this offense. This includes the use of alcohol and drugs, whether the drugs are recreational or prescribed. When that driver is suspected of driving under the influence, a police officer or medical professional will perform a breathalyzer test to determine the level of intoxication to determine the severity of the crime. Driving under the influence poses a danger to both you and the other drivers on the road. The penalties for driving under the influence also depend on the severity of the crime and the state in which you are driving. Often times, for a first offense, a driver may be fined and have to spend time doing community service. They will also need to take classes that help them stay sober. Second offenses carry a more hefty fine and potential jail time. Drivers may also be subject to have their license revoked for a period of time until they deemed fit to drive safely again. Disorderly Conduct This offense comes in a variety of forms. It is typically referring to a crime involving being publicly under the influence, disturbing the peace, or even loitering in restricted areas. When people are being disruptive enough to cause problems is typically when police officers will consider the crime to be categorized under disorderly conduct. Those who are charged with disorderly conduct pose no danger to them or others. They are just simply disruptive those nearby by engaging in inappropriate or bothersome actions in areas where they shouldn't be. This offense is typically categorized as a misdemeanor or even an infraction, which means the penalties are minor. It may require you to pay a small fine or perform some community service. Disorderly conduct crimes that are more severe may result in a short amount of jail time, but this is typically not the case. Other penalties may involve restraining orders and probation, which require the arrested individual to obey certain behaviors issued by the courts. These are the most common reasons why people get arrested in our country. In order to avoid being arrested, it's simple: avoid breaking the law. By making smart choices, you won't have to request bail bonds in Orlando and spend any time behind bars. Facing hefty fines and paying back your friends and bondsman are just two of the steps in the journey after you have a criminal record. You will also likely need to apologize to many of your loved ones and you may even live your life full of regret if you harmed anyone while you were breaking the law. Once you find yourself in trouble with the law, you can find a way out by trusting the right bondsman. If you or someone you know is in need of trusted bonds services, contact us today for help. Can it really be true that most people in jail are being held before trial? And how much of mass incarceration is a result of the war on drugs? These questions are harder to answer than you might think, because our country’s systems of confinement are so fragmented. The various government agencies involved in the justice system collect a lot of critical data, but it is not designed to help policymakers or the public understand what’s going on. As public support for criminal justice reform continues to build, however, it’s more important than ever that we get the facts straight and understand the big picture. This report offers some much needed clarity by piecing together this country’s disparate systems of confinement. The American criminal justice system holds almost 2.3 million people in 1,833 state prisons, 110 federal prisons, 1,772 juvenile correctional facilities, 3,134 local jails, 218 immigration detention facilities, and 80 Indian Country jails as well as in military prisons, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric hospitals, and prisons in the U.S. territories. This report provides a detailed look at where and why people are locked up in the U.S., and dispels some modern myths to focus attention on the real drivers of mass incarceration, including exceedingly punitive responses to even the most minor offenses. What is the ‘New World Order’ and why has Joe Biden caused uproar by using the phrase? US president excites conspiracy theorists with unfortunate choice of words at White House event Joe Biden caused a stir on Monday during a gathering of business leaders at the White House when he alluded to a coming “new world order” in the wake of the Ukraine crisis, apparently not stopping to consider the awkward legacy of the phrase. Addressing the Business Roundtable’s CEO Quarterly Meeting, which included the bosses of General Motors, Apple and Amazon, Mr Biden concluded his remarks by saying: “Now is a time when things are shifting. We’re going to – there’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it. And we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.” The phrase quickly began trending on Twitter, with commentators wasting no time in gloating over what they saw as the president’s presumably accidental invocation of a well-worn conspiracy theory claiming that an elite globalist cabal operating from the shadows is plotting to carve up the world and impose totalitarian rule. “I don’t want Joe Biden leading a line for Jello at a nursing home let alone the world,” one wrote on Twitter. “The nuts who brought us lockdowns creating ‘a New World Order’ is terrifying.” “Did y’all forget everything we learned in those 2012 conspiracy videos?” said another. “Did y’all forget mass vaccination, mass surveillance (vaccine passports) & a total police state is apart [sic] of the New World Order.” And so it went on. Another professed, apparently sincerely: “I believe with all my heart that Joe Biden was installed by Globalists, Babylon included, to usher in the New World Order.” Anyone who took the trouble to listen to Mr Biden’s speech in full would have been left in no doubt that he was referring to the shifting sands of geopolitical relations in response to Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine last month. The conflict has seen cities pulverised by savage siege warfare tactics, Ukrainians stage a courageous fightback and war crimes alleged as bombs rain down on maternity hospitals, children’s nurseries, shopping centres, a community theatre and even a Holocaust memorial. The international community has meanwhile moved to impose punitive economic sanctions against Russian businesses, banks, politicians and oligarchs the likes of which have never been seen before, shunning the country’s exports and energy as corporations cease operations, cutting it off commercially as well as diplomatically in the hope of forcing an end to the hostilities. Mr Biden warned the CEOs assembled in Washington that Russia could retaliate with further cyberattacks against the west and use chemical weapons against Ukrainian civilians as the conflict morphs into a drawn-out war of attrition, rather than the swift conquest Mr Putin appears to have envisioned. All of which means the balance of power between nations will inevitably be upended as the world seeks to reorder diplomatic relations to exclude the Kremlin – so long as Mr Putin remains in charge and his war against a free democratic nation continues unchecked, that is – which is clearly what the US president was referring to. Historically, the phrase “New World Order” has been common currency and used in much the same way as Mr Biden by the likes of Woodrow Wilson and Sir Winston Churchill in the aftermath of the First and Second World Wars respectively and, more recently, by George HW Bush in response to the collapse of the Soviet Union. In an address to a joint session of Congress on 11 September 1990, the first President Bush delivered a speech actually entitled “Toward a New World Order” in which he directly quoted Mr Churchill. “Until now, the world we’ve known has been a world divided – a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and the Cold War,” he began. “Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the genuine prospect of new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a ‘world order’ in which ‘the principles of justice and fair play... protect the weak against the strong’. A world where the United Nations, freed from Cold War stalemate, is poised to fulfil the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.” However, the phrase has also been used in a much less optimistic sense, notably in promoting Red Scare fears over the spread of the “international communist conspiracy” in the 1950s, which culminated in Republican senator Joseph McCarthy’s shameful persecutions of the period. That mood of post-war paranoia tapped into much more ancient social anxieties about the possibility of shadowy secret covens engaging in evil, which saw “witches” hunted, convicted and executed by Puritans in 17th century England, Scotland and America and fraternal organisations like the Freemasons accused of practising Satanism. The Illuminati, the model for all subsequent sinister behind-closed-doors cabals feared by conspiracy theorists – not least the adrenochrome-harvesting legion of demon Democrats allegedly operating out of Hillary Clinton’s favourite pizza parlour – traces its origins to the German Enlightenment of the 18th century. Belief in such a group plotting insurrection to realise its “new world order” first gained real prominence in the US among anti-government extremists in the 1990s, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). “Conspiracists believe that a tyrannical, socialist ‘one-world’ conspiracy has already taken over most of the planet and schemes to eliminate the last bastion of freedom, the United States, with the help of collaborators within the government,” the ADL states. “Through repressive measures, as well as manufactured crises such as terrorist attacks and pandemics, the globalist conspirators seek to eliminate dissent and to disarm Americans so that the ‘New World Order’ can move in and enslave them.” The ADL says its adherents believe the conspirators one day plan to declare martial law in the US, confiscate firearms and round up dissenters into secret concentration camps. The movement brings together American right-wing militant instincts with Christian fundementalist doom prophecies – right-wing televangelist Pat Robertson wrote a best-selling book called The New World Order in 1991 warning against imaginary enemies – and has exploded over the last three decades in tandem with the growth of the internet, a feverish rumour mill of half-truths, political confusion and wilful bad faith interpretations at the best of times. Conspiracy theories have now become a form of mass entertainment on social media, fuelled by everything from The X Files to Alex Jones and culminating in the choose-your-own-reality fringe fantasies of QAnon, whose zealots, bored in lockdown during the pandemic, blended ancient anti-Semitic smears with quest narrative mythologies and pop cultural borrowings to worrying ends. Apparent gaffes like Mr Biden’s only provide further grist to the mill of those who choose to believe that lizard men in silk hoods congregate behind boardroom doors to consult with their puppet-master overlord, hell-bent on global domination and busy manipulating international events to achieve his villainous ends. Can it really be true that most people in jail are legally innocent? How much of mass incarceration is a result of the war on drugs, or the profit motives of private prisons? How has the COVID-19 pandemic changed decisions about how people are punished when they break the law? These essential questions are harder to answer than you might expect. The various government agencies involved in the criminal legal system collect a lot of data, but very little is designed to help policymakers or the public understand what’s going on. As public support for criminal justice reform continues to build — and as the pandemic raises the stakes higher — it’s more important than ever that we get the facts straight and understand the big picture. Further complicating matters is the fact that the U.S. doesn’t have one “criminal justice system;” instead, we have thousands of federal, state, local, and tribal systems. Together, these systems hold almost 2 million people in 1,566 state prisons, 98 federal prisons, 3,116 local jails, 1,323 juvenile correctional facilities, 181 immigration detention facilities, and 80 Indian country jails, as well as in military prisons, civil commitment centers, state psychiatric hospitals, and prisons in the U.S. territories. This report offers some much-needed clarity by piecing together the data about this country’s disparate systems of confinement. It provides a detailed look at where and why people are locked up in the U.S., and dispels some modern myths to focus attention on the real drivers of mass incarceration and overlooked issues that call for reform. This big-picture view is a lens through which the main drivers of mass incarceration come into focus; it allows us to identify important, but often ignored, systems of confinement. The detailed views bring these overlooked systems to light, from immigration detention to civil commitment and youth confinement. In particular, local jails often receive short shrift in larger discussions about criminal justice, but they play a critical role as “incarceration’s front door” and have a far greater impact than the daily population suggests. While this pie chart provides a comprehensive snapshot of our correctional system, the graphic does not capture the enormous churn in and out of our correctional facilities, nor the far larger universe of people whose lives are affected by the criminal justice system. In 2021, about 421,000 people entered prison gates, but people went to jail almost 7 million times. Some have just been arrested and will make bail within hours or days, while many others are too poor to make bail and remain behind bars until their trial. Only a small number (about 87,500 on any given day) have been convicted, and are generally serving misdemeanors sentences of under a year. At least 1 in 4 people who go to jail will be arrested again within the same year — often those dealing with poverty, mental illness, and substance use disorders, whose problems only worsen with incarceration. With a sense of the big picture, the next question is: why are so many people locked up? How many are incarcerated for drug offenses? Are the profit motives of private companies driving incarceration? Or is it really about public safety and keeping dangerous people off the streets? There are a plethora of modern myths about incarceration. Most have a kernel of truth, but these myths distract us from focusing on the most important drivers of incarceration. The overcriminalization of drug use, the use of private prisons, and low-paid or unpaid prison labor are among the most contentious issues in criminal justice today because they inspire moral outrage. But they do not answer the question of why most people are incarcerated or how we can dramatically — and safely — reduce our use of confinement. Likewise, emotional responses to sexual and violent offenses often derail important conversations about the social, economic, and moral costs of incarceration and lifelong punishment. False notions of what a “violent crime” conviction means about an individual’s dangerousness continue to be used in an attempt to justify long sentences — even though that’s not what victims want. At the same time, misguided beliefs about the “services” provided by jails are used to rationalize the construction of massive new “mental health jails.” Finally, simplistic solutions to reducing incarceration, such as moving people from jails and prisons to community supervision, ignore the fact that “alternatives” to incarceration often lead to incarceration anyway. Focusing on the policy changes that can end mass incarceration, and not just put a dent in it, requires the public to put these issues into perspective. Some criminals might be content to serve time in prison, if they know their assets will be available upon release, or that their non-incarcerated families may continue to enjoy the proceeds of crime. This is why confiscation of assets is such an important measure to prevent and combat organized crime. It is also an equally important tool to prevent organized crime infiltration of the legal economy. Confiscation is also known as forfeiture in some jurisdictions. The two terms will be used interchangeably in this Module. Confiscation of assets or property is the permanent deprivation of property by order of a court or administrative procedures, which transfers the ownership of assets derived from criminal activity to the State. The persons or entities that owned those funds or assets at the time of the confiscation or forfeiture lose all rights to the confiscated assets (FATF, 2017; McCaw, 2011; Ramaswamy, 2013). The large revenues generated from organized crime activity can affect the legitimate economy and in particular the banking system adversely through untaxed profits and illicitly funded investments. Furthermore, even after having invested in the legal economy, organized criminal groups often continue to use illicit tools and methods to advance their business, potentially pushing other businesses out of the market. Confiscation of assets is a way to undermine the fiscal structure and even the survival of an organized criminal group by seizing illicitly obtained cash and any property derived from criminal activity (Aylesworth, 1991; Baumer, 2008; U.S. Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture, 1990). Confiscation occurs under one of two types of proceedings: conviction-based confiscation or forfeiture and non-conviction-based confiscation or forfeiture. They differ in the level of proof required for it to take place. Conventionally, non-conviction-based confiscation requires a standard of proof that is lower than the standard required to obtain a conviction in a criminal court. Conviction-based confiscation or forfeiture: confiscation by the State of proceeds of a crime for which a conviction of an offender has been recorded. This is also called criminal confiscation or forfeiture in some jurisdictions. Non-conviction-based confiscation or forfeiture: asset confiscation or forfeiture in the absence of the conviction of the wrongdoer. The term is often used interchangeably with civil confiscation or forfeiture. Furthermore, States might decide to adopt a value based approach to confiscation, which enables a court to impose a pecuniary liability (such as a fine), once it determines the benefit derived directly or indirectly from the criminal conduct. Value-based confiscation is also included in article 12 (1)(a) of the Organized Crime Convention. It is also worth mentioning that, in some countries, assets may be confiscated even if they are not directly linked to the specific crime for which the offender has been convicted, but clearly result from similar criminal activities (i.e. extended confiscation). Growing use of confiscation offers the opportunity to disrupt continuing illicit enterprises and to curtail the effect of large amounts of illicitly obtained cash on the economy. There has been a growing body of case law and policy regarding the seizure and disposition of property in asset forfeiture cases. Concerns regarding the seizure and disposition of property include: Lawfulness of confiscation. Protecting the rights of third parties. Management and disposition of seized or confiscated assets. Lawfulness of confiscation Every jurisdiction has specific powers and limits to guide the confiscation of assets. The procedures permitted correspond with the legal traditions in the country. In some civil law jurisdictions, the power to order the restraint or seizure of assets subject to confiscation is granted to prosecutors, investigating magistrates or law enforcement agencies. In other civil law jurisdictions, judicial authorization is required. In common law jurisdictions, an order to restrain or seize assets generally requires judicial authorization (with some exceptions in seizure cases). Legal systems may have strict obligations to give notice to investigative targets, such as when a search or production order is served on a third party such as a financial institution. That third party may be obliged to advise their client of the existence of such orders, which means that the client would be forewarned about an investigative interest. That must be taken into consideration when taking steps to secure assets or use coercive investigative measures (UNODC, 2012). The legal principle behind confiscation or forfeiture is that the government may take property without compensation to the owner if the property is acquired or used illegally. There are several broad mechanisms for accomplishing this, however the three predominant types of processes used to confiscate property are: administrative (no conviction), property or criminal (conviction-based), and value-based (UNODC, 2012). Conviction-based (or criminal) confiscation In a conviction-based confiscation, property can only be seized once the owner has been convicted of certain crimes. Criminal confiscation is a common approach to asset confiscation in which investigators gather evidence, trace and secure assets, conduct a prosecution, and obtain a conviction. Upon the conviction, confiscation can be ordered by the court. The standard of proof required (normally proof beyond a reasonable doubt) for the confiscation order is often the same as that required to achieve a criminal conviction. Non-conviction-based (or administrative) confiscation A non-conviction-based confiscation occurs independently of any criminal proceeding and is directed at the property itself, having been used or acquired illegally. Conviction of the property owner is not relevant in this kind of confiscation. Administrative confiscation generally involves a procedure for confiscating assets used or involved in the commission of the offence that have been seized in the course of the investigation. It is most often seen in the field of customs enforcement at borders (e.g., bulk cash, drug, or weapons seizures), and applies when the nature of the item seized justifies an administrative confiscation approach (without a prior court review). This process is less viable when the property is a bank account or other immovable property. The confiscation is carried out by an investigator or authorized agency (such as a police unit or a designated law enforcement agency), and usually follows a process where the person affected by the seizure can apply for relief from the automatic confiscation of the seized property, such as a court hearing. All proceeds of crime are subject to confiscation, which has been interpreted to include interest, dividends, income, and real property, although there are variations by jurisdiction (for more information, please see StAR's " A Good Practice Guide for Non-conviction-based Asset Forfeiture"). Whereas the Organized Crime Convention does not make reference to this type of confiscation, the Convention against Corruption includes it in article 54 (1)(c), which encourages States to "consider taking such measures as may be necessary to allow confiscation of [property acquired through or involved in the commission of an offence established in accordance with this Convention] without a criminal conviction in cases in which the offender cannot be prosecuted by reason of death, flight or absence or in other appropriate cases". Value-based confiscation Some jurisdictions elect to use a value-based approach, which is a system where a convicted person is ordered to pay an amount of money equivalent to the value of their criminal benefit. This is sometimes used in cases where specific assets cannot be located. The court calculates the benefit to the convicted offender for a particular offence. Value-based confiscation allows for the value of proceeds and instrumentalities of a crime to be determined and assets of an equivalent value to be confiscated. Protecting the rights of third parties Concern arises regarding the rights of individuals not involved in criminal activity, but whose property is used in, or derived from, the criminal activity of others (Friedler, 2013; Geis, 2008; Gibson, 2012; Goldsmith and Lenck, 1990). This might include uninformed lien holders and purchasers, joint tenants, or business partners. A person who suspects his or her property is the target of a criminal or administrative confiscation investigation may sell the property, give ownership to family members, or otherwise dispose of it. Third-party claims on seized property are sometimes delayed in criminal confiscations because the claim often cannot be litigated until the end of the criminal trial. In an administrative confiscation, the procedure moves more quickly because the confiscation hearing usually occurs soon after the confiscation. In some jurisdictions, third parties are protected under the 'innocent owner' exception for non-conviction-based confiscations, if the government fails to establish that they had knowledge, consent, or wilful blindness to illegal usage of the property. Disposition of confiscated assets Some of most commonly confiscated assets are cash, cars and weapons, as well as luxury property such as boats, planes and jewellery. Residential and commercial property are also subject to confiscation. Once an asset is confiscated, it must be appraised to determine the property's value, less any claims against it. The item must be stored and maintained while ownership and any third-party claims are heard in court. If the challenge to the confiscation is not effective, the property is taken for government use or auctioned. There has been controversy over the use of confiscated assets by some law enforcement agencies. Laws in some jurisdictions earmark specific uses for confiscated assets, such as for education costs. Some have claimed that confiscation of assets that are kept by police provide an incentive for spurious or aggressive confiscations (Bartels, 2010; Skolnick, 2008; Worrall and Kovandzic, 2008). Agenda 21 – Eminent Domain – Confiscation of Private Property – Sustainable Development – Re-wilding The United Nations Agenda 21 was signed by the United States in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro. Very few people have even heard of it yet it is being implemented in every city, community, and region in America. Agenda 21 is a 40 chapter document listing goals to be achieved globally. It is the global plan to change the way we “live, eat, learn, and communicate” because we must “save the earth.” “Its regulation would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation – even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and all people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system,” according to Berit Kjos, author of Brave New Schools. Maurice Strong, Secretary-general of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro said, “. . . Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat consumption and large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” A shift is necessary which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations. In other words, the Global plan is for us to live on the level of third world nations. That means limited use of fuel of any kind (we will ride bicycles instead of riding in automobiles), no air-conditioning, and we will all be forced to live in tiny apartments in tenement buildings in the middle of a city. That same year, 1992, Al Gore wrote his book, “Earth in the Balance,” and began promoting the Hoax of Global Warming. But it took Bill Clinton to actually introduce something so invasive to our nation and get by with it without the public becoming aware. He appointed his “President’s Council on Sustainable Development” through which he literally gave away the rights and freedoms the framers of the Constitution had provided. Many Americans naively cringe at the mention of “global government” or “conspiracy.” But it is a basic element of human nature to seek wealth and power, and people throughout human history have conspired together to do so. What is Sustainable Development? According to its authors, this is the cover story. The objective of sustainable development is to integrate economic, social, environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity. Sustainablists insist that every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components: global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction. Social Equity (Social Justice) Social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people (except the elitists, of course) “to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment.” That means the Redistribution of wealth. Private property is considered a social injustice (except for the elitists, of course) since not everyone can build wealth from it. National sovereignty is a social injustice. Universal health care (controlled by the elitists, of course) is a social justice. These are ALL part of Agenda 21 policy. Economic Prosperity?? Public Private Partnerships (PPP) – which means that all public roads, utilities, public buildings, etc. that have been built and paid for with taxpayers’ dollars, will be given to Private Corporations to do with as they choose. Special dealings between government (which is already controlled by the mega corporations) and certain, “chosen” corporations which get tax breaks, grants and the government’s power of Eminent Domain to implement sustainable policy. Eminent Domain has been extended to allow the government in any area, including City, and State, to take your property at will. Government-sanctioned monopolies are also part of Agenda 21. What gives Agenda 21 Ruling Authority? More than 178 nations adopted Agenda 21 as official policy during the signing ceremony at the Earth Summit. US president George H. W. Bush signed the document for the U.S. As a result, with the assistance of many groups like the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), Sustainable Development is now emerging as government policy in every town, county, and state in the nation. Revealing Quotes from Planners “Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by EVERY person on earth. . . it calls for specific changes in the activities of ALL people. . . Effective execution of Agenda 21 will REQUIRE a profound reorientation of ALL humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced. . .” Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet (Earthpress, 1993) “The realities of life on our planet dictate that continued economic development as we know it cannot be sustained. . . Sustainable development, therefore, is a program of action for local and global economic reform – a program that has yet to be fully defined.” The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide, published by ICLEI, 1996. “Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project What is not sustainable? Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.” UN’s Biodiversity Assessment Report. Hide Agenda 21’s UN roots from the people “Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society. . . This segment of our society who fear One-World Government and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined the “conspiracy” by undertaking Agenda 21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development. Here is a succinct list of Agenda 21 and related programs that will eliminate many things Americans hold dear. These have been declared “unsustainable” and will be abolished. Here are some of them: 1. ALL private property rights (ownership of private property) 2. ALL forms of irrigation, pesticides & commercial fertilizer 3. Livestock production and most meat consumption 4. Privately owned vehicles and personal travel 5. Use of fossil fuels for power generation or mechanized travel 6. Single family homes 7. Most forms of mineral extraction and timber harvesting 8. Human population must be reduced to fewer than 1 billion people (from the present population of over 6 billion people). This is not coming directly from Washington D.C. or state legislatures for the most part. It is seeping in through local city and county governments. Agenda 21 brings with it stealthy code words, comforting words such as “smart growth,” “social justice,” “bio-diversity,” and “sustained development.” You will hear them often. Translated these terms effectively mean total environmental dictatorship and the elevation of the pagan practice of the worship of Mother Earth – Gaia! Agenda 21 is designed to control every aspect of human life on every square inch of planet earth – and man falls to the bottom of the food chain. If Agenda 21 succeeds animals will become more important than man as will plants and trees. We can already see ample evidence of this process in motion today. Agenda 21’s real message is: “Man is the problem. Nature must be preserved and take precedence. Mother Earth must not be scratched.” The 4 “E’s” of Agenda 21 are not what they appear: Education = Indoctrination into believing that nature is more important than man and the group is more important than the individual. The new purpose of education is to learn values not facts. Students must become global, not American citizens. Equity = Theft of private property, open borders, remove God, morality and responsibility. Economy = Redistribution of America’s wealth to foreign countries by outsourcing jobs, factories and technology creating massive unemployment Environment = Nature is more important than man. The new god is Mother Earth. Phony science creates phony regulations destroying energy independence and industry. Each policy and regulation is in place to control more and more of your life. So WHAT is the REAL GOAL of Agenda 21? In simple, direct terms, the Real Goal of Agenda 21 is for the Elitist Jews to take control of the whole world, including ALL the wealth of everyone in the world, including control of ALL the resources in every country in the world, and kill off 5 1/2 billion people – ALL “Gentiles” of course – and just keep enough people around to be their slaves. The population of America, until they can be destroyed, will have their private property confiscated, will be forced to live in tiny high rise tenement buildings in large cities where they will not be allowed to have a car. They will walk to a job for which they will receive slave labor wages. On every floor of the tenement building will be an agent of the Secret Police who will keep track of the comings and goings of everyone in the building. Lest you think that I am exaggerating, I visited the Soviet Union in 1988, a year before the Berlin Wall came down (which was nothing more than a propaganda stunt by the Communists to make the world think Communism was “dead”). I was traveling with a group of ten other Orthopedic Surgeons in a program to meet with Russian orthopedic surgeons to share information. Our plane landed in Moscow where we stayed overnight in a hotel before flying on to Kurgan, in Siberia. Our passports were confiscated and we were assigned to a room in the hotel. As we got off the elevator to go to our respective rooms, we had to sign in with the Secret Police agent on that floor, as we did every time we left – or returned to – our hotel room. The next day we flew on to Kurgan, a city of 350,000 people, a city that virtually no American has ever heard of. Even though this was mid-summer and the temperatures were in the 70’s, there was no grass and no flowers anywhere – just dirt. As “special physician guests from America” we were housed in the “best” hotel in Kurgan. Each hotel room was approximately 8’ X 10’ – the size of a prison cell – with one small window. The “bed” was a thin mattress laid on a wooden surface. Before we started on our trip, each of us had been told to bring a golf ball, but we didn’t know the reason until we got to our hotel. The bathroom was about 3 1/2’ square with no bathtub or shower that we could see. The small sink had no stopper – which was why we were told to bring the golf ball to use as the stopper. The toilet seat was made from plywood that was cut down the center of the board – long ways – exposing the rough inner part of the plywood, making it prone to delivering splinters. We were told that the “shower” was in the ceiling in the center of the bathroom. So one would just stand there, turn the shower on, and water would soak everything including the sink and the toilet. There was a drain in the center of the floor. But the biggest problem was that there was NO hot water. The City administrators turned off the hot water in the Spring – for the entire city – and turned it back on in the fall, when they felt it was appropriate. So one could only shower with freezing cold water – straight from the melted ice rivers of Siberia. Each morning, I could hear the screams of everyone up and down the hotel hallway as they showered. Finally, because we were “special” Americans, the hotel provided a bucket of boiling water outside our door each morning. That was a gracious gesture but it was useless for the purpose of showering. It could be used in the sink – mixed with cold water – for the men to shave or for any of us to take a sponge bath. I saw no private homes in this city of 350,000. Everyone lived in a high rise tenement. We American physicians were not allowed to talk to the Russian physicians we were visiting at any time other than over the operating table as we performed surgery. We were not allowed to eat with them, nor to visit them in their apartments. However, under dark of night, at danger to ourselves and to them, we did – at their request – sneak into their apartments to talk. Physician families of six, parents and four children, were housed in an apartment of approximately 500 square feet. Physicians were paid less than bus drivers because the policy of the Communist state was that a physician – if he made a mistake – could only kill one person at a time whereas a bus driver – if he made an error – could kill a whole busload of people. When we were visiting them in their tiny apartments, we had to speak in whispers so no other tenants could hear us because everyone was taught to be a snitch. We had to come to their apartments and leave from their apartments by the back stairs after given a special signal of “all clear.” We American physicians were given the opportunity to visit an Art store in Kurgan, a shop that was kept locked continuously otherwise, so no resident of Kurgan had access to it. It contained reproductions of famous artists, and books of famous classical artists, and books of classical literature. All of us bought some of these books and painting reproductions to surreptitiously give to the Russian physicians who were not allowed to have anything of beauty. We American surgeons were appalled at the instruments the Russian orthopedic surgeons were forced to use. The equipment was at least 50 years old and completely – and dangerously – rusty. There were no disposable needles, no antibiotics and no disposable surgical gowns. All needles were also rusty and had to be sterilized and re-used. And their sterilization techniques were from the previous century. The hospital was at least 100 years old. There were virtually no cars on the street – except for an occasional “official.”. I wanted to buy a souvenir from my visit to Kurgan so I proceeded to the only department store in the city – GUM – pronounced goom, the abbreviation for the Russian words for “main universal store.” Unfortunately, there was nothing to be purchased. There were dozens of long, old wooden cases with glass tops, remnants also of the previous century, but all they contained were black combs endlessly lined up 2 inches apart. The rest of the merchandise was made of the cheapest plastic that wouldn’t even be sold in a 99 cent store in the U.S. There were no grocery stores that I could find. However, little old ladies in their babushkas were lined up selling what they had produced in their “garden.” The average “seller” had no more than 6 items, for example: 2 small tomatoes, 1 straggly cucumber, and 3 green onions. I never found out where any other food was sold. However, our hotel fed us (Americans) excellent food which was imported from Moscow, just for us. None of that food was available to the Russian people. The Russian people look just like Americans. There were many young, beautiful girls, but they aged rapidly from their very difficult life. Our guide was a lovely, outgoing, young Russian woman who spoke excellent English. At one point she was telling us how excited she was for her upcoming vacation. But she couldn’t make final plans until she got her Visa – to travel to Moscow! – a city within her own country. The Russians were not allowed to travel even to another city without a visa from Moscow, the capital, requiring all travel plans to be registered with the state. I had to leave a day earlier than the rest of the surgeons in my group, therefore I had to board a small plane, a commercial plane that carried about 30 passengers to take me from Kurgan to Moscow. The plane had to be at least 30 years old. The seats had less than one inch of padding that covered several metal bars that drilled into one’s backside during the trip. No food or beverage was served on the trip that lasted over an hour. There was one Flight attendant, a large, fierce looking woman in her mid-fifties, who looked like Nurse Ratched from the movie, “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” If you never saw that movie, then the next best illustration would be a woman bouncer in a low class bar. No one was allowed to get up from their seat at any time during the flight, even to go to the bathroom. (I’m not even sure there was a bathroom on the plane.) When we reached our destination at the Moscow airport, no one got up, so I stayed in my seat, too. Finally, when the prop engines were turned off, the pilots got off the plane and they were the ones who unloaded all the luggage. At that point, “Nurse Ratched” came to me, pointed at me, and motioned me to go with her. She spoke no words. I followed her off the plane and a black car with dark tinted windows was waiting for me at the bottom of the stairs. The driver got out of the car and motioned me to get in. I’ll have to admit, I was not totally comfortable getting into that car, not knowing where I was being taken. Only then were the other passengers allowed to de-plane. Fortunately, I was taken directly to the plane I was to board for my flight home from Moscow, where, for the first time since coming to the U.S.S.R, I was able to feel some sense of freedom. The Soviet Union was – and is today – ruled by the Jews, the same Jews that rule America, China, and virtually every country in the world, except for Iran, North Korea, and a few others who are now on their “mopping up” agenda. What I experienced in Kurgan was just a taste of what we can expect in America. Our Slave-masters are the same as those in Kurgan, Moscow, and the entire Soviet Union, and every other Communist country. Our lives will be worth nothing. Back to Agenda 21 The Deliberate LIE of the story of “saving the environment” – which is actually being destroyed by these same Elitist Jews, not the population of the world – is nothing but a “cover” story to keep the people in the dark while the “Plan” proceeds at break-neck speed. After all, if people caught on to the truth of what is going on, they might make some attempt to survive! This is nothing less than blatant, RAW, Communism! And we, the people, are paying for it. Cities, towns, and states are being seduced into destroying their own rights, and the rights of their fellow Americans, by federal grants and “easy” money to implement these diabolical plans. Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn’t care less whether it’s called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department in 2009. It proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights: Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods “Balanced” means putting prostitutes, drug addicts, street people, gang members, etc. as tenants in the same buildings with middle class families. This has been going on in San Francisco for years. Upper middle class Americans bought up-scale condominiums in up-scale high rise buildings in San Francisco only to see the City give HUGE subsidies (sometimes paying as much as $4,000 per month) to put these indigent people in the same building. Their goal? To destroy the value of the condominiums owned by the upper middle class thereby destroying the largest investment they owned. The indigent people who were put in these buildings at great expense to the city would defecate in the elevators and in the hallways, leave trash everywhere, put graffiti all over everything inside and outside the building, buy and sell dope on the property, bring their thug friends into the building, and do everything possible to make the decent tenants miserable and frightened. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/publication/download_pdf/Growing-Smart-Legislative-Guidebook.pdf https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/full-report.pdf https://rumble.com/v2yky8g-this-is-un-4g3nda-21-aw4reness-is-the-first-step-in-the-r3slst4nc3-by-the-p.html Agenda 21 and 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It was adopted by more than 178 countries at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992.

A Brief History Of America In Pictures - Can We Save Our Republic ? No I Do Not Thank So - Yes Happy Veterans Day - We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights - A Republic If We Can Keep It ? The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. How far our Government has come from being limited and protecting freedoms to Tyranny and Blaming Problems on Freedom and Bioweapon Covid-19 U.S.A.. 1. Freedom America is what we stood for (Background) - 2. 13 Original Colonies Joined to beat the British - 3. Pilgrims Landing - 4. Tyranny Grows British Kill people with NO accountability (much like our Gov Today) - 5. Protest started over high and excess taxes by Red Coats - Much like today - 6. Boston Massacre- Standing Army/Police Shoots Kids for throwing rocks - 7. Boston Tea Party To Peaceful Protest the more high taxes - 8. Protest grows over Tea tax, sugar tax, stamp act - 9. 1765, Quartering Act Troops can take over homes at their will - 10. leaders getting fed up, Give me Liberty or Give me Death, Patrick Henry 11. Paul Revere Pony Run, One If By Sea - 12. 1775, Revolutionary War - 13. 1775, George Washing is appointed as the Commander In Chief of Army - 14. Jun 1775, Battle of Bunker Hill - 15. Navy Was Established To fight off British Navy - 16. Thomas Paine starts paper called Common Sense To Inform on Tyranny - 17. Mar 1776, British Leave and evacuate Boston, Red Coats Run - 18. Jul 4th, 1776. Declaration of Independence - 19. Join or Die, Ben Franklin, first political cartoon that advocated unification of the colonies - 20. Dec, 1791, Bill Of Rights 21. Don't Tread On Me, Gadsden Flag first flown on a warship,1775 as a battle cry for American independence from British rule - 22. On May 4, 1970, members of the Ohio National Guard fired into a crowd of Kent State University demonstrators, killing four & wounding nine Kent State students - 23. Randy Weaver, 1992 Ruby Ridge standoff at his cabin near Naples, Idaho, that resulted in the deaths of his wife & son after he was set up by Gov - 24. The Waco siege, the Waco massacre, 900 Fed Agents siege the compound of religious sect Branch Davidians, Killing 75 people, 25 were children - 25. Oklahoma Federal Building Bombing in retaliation for Gov Killing at Waco & Ruby Ridge - 26. Tim McVeigh, claiming he was doing his Patriotic duty Holding Gov Accountable being led out of court - 27. McVeigh sold bumper stickers at Waco promoting Freedom & Gun Rights Knowing gov is trying to disarm the People so they can't fight Gov or hold Gov accountable - 28. FBI Agent Shot UNARMED Man over Bundy Standoff, Gov was stealing and killing Cattle over taxes, Agent cleared of shooting, Gov protecting Gov, NO accountability - 29. Lavoy Finicum, Good American Killed for standing up to Gov Tyranny - 30. FBI operation Coin-Tel-Pro to Spy On Americans - More Gov Tyranny 31. US Patriot ACT, largest seizer of Freedoms By Gov - Ignoring our Constitution - 32. FBI caught paying Best Buy To spy and Unlawfully Search all computers they worked on. Paying employees Gov money to find or PLANT evidence on comp for money. - 33. Gov Seized Guns UNLAWFULLY during Katrina crisis, Gov Broke into home & forcefully seized gun from citizens leaving them helpless to looters and criminals - 34. RED FLAGS being pushed by Gov to seize more guns from citizens - 35. Beto O' Rourke running for Texas Governor gives speech, "Hell yea, we are going to take your AR-15" finally admitting Gov Wants your guns. - 36. FBI has secret NO FLY lists & expands it to Trump Supporters Going To Protest - 37. FBI has become the most Tyrannical Gov Agency, ignoring the Constitution, secret warrants, secret list, NO Accountability - 38. FBI disinformation, working with Google, Twitter, other social platforms, using Gov power to force Pvt Companies to SPY on Americans - 39. Massive Voter Fraud, covered up & censored by Gov and Media - 40. Gov throws out Due Process & Jails political opponents IGNORING the Constitution 41. Gov Shoots and KILLS Unarmed Woman for Climbing in a window, Gov Cleared & Justified shooting - 42. Biden's Open Border flooding country with over 3 Million Illegals, American Hating Terrorist to flood more Voter Fraud - 43. Gov Forced Lock Downs, Masks, Vaccines on American, Yet Open border people get free food, phones & not required to be Vaxed. - 44. Gov CDC MADATING Kids Get vaxed or can't go to school - 45. Biden & Congress Approve 87,000 NEW IRS agents to further impose MORE TAXES - 46. Armed Americans Stand up to Federal Agents at Bundy Standoff - Gov Backs Down - 47. FBI puts out a Warning Flyer labeling Patriots & Gun owners has Dangerous and Extremist - 48. Congress passing 5000 page bills without reading them giving BILLIONS to other countries - 49. National Debt Clock - 31 TRILLION IN DEBT AND GROWING - Gov Needs more Taxes & Money - 50. Judicial Watch releases report showing FBI & Biden are Hiding Biden's Crimes 51. When Gov becomes Tyrannical It is not only our right, it is our Duty to stop it. - 52. We The People - must defend & protect our constitution and bill of rights (2nd Amendment) - 54. Ben Franklin - We must hand together or we will Hang separately - 55 A Republic if you can keep it - 56 Right to Bear Arms - 57 Molon Labe - Come & take it - Don't Tread On Me - 58 Three Percent - 59 Betsy Ross Flag Does the U.S. government have the right to kill its own citizens? A Hellfire missile obliterated a 16-year-old American citizen in Yemen last fall. U.S. President Barrack Obama personally signs off on all such "targeted killings," and while most are directed against foreigners – usually Muslims suspected of being radical jihadists – at least three Americans are among the hundreds killed in the last three years in drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia. Hellfire missiles fired from unmanned Predators have become the president's preferred means of dealing "justice" overseas. The 16-year-old, reportedly sitting among a group of men at a roadside café in Yemen, was Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, son of Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S.-born radical Muslim cleric widely suspected of recruiting jihadists for attacks on the United States. Mr. al-Awlaki had been killed two weeks earlier in another Hellfire missile strike along with another U.S. citizen, Samir Khan, a propagandist for al-Qaeda in Yemen. It remains unknown whether the 16-year-old was killed because he was the son of a suspected al-Qaeda figure or whether he was so-called collateral damage and someone else in the group was the target okayed by Mr. Obama. At issue is whether the president, any president, can simply sign a death warrant for a U.S. citizen overseas or whether Constitutional guarantees of "due process" require more than an Oval Office checklist. While many Americans savaged former U.S. President George W. Bush for approving harsh measures, including so-called enhanced interrogation techniques that many, including the current president, deplored as inhumane and tantamount to torture, the targeted killing on Mr. Obama's watch of a handful U.S. citizen has attracted little outrage. Now two rights groups, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights are suing Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and Central Intelligence Director David Petraeus, among others, in an attempt to pull back the curtain on Mr. Obama's murky program of selective assassination. They can't sue the president directly; he has immunity. The suit was filed earlier this month on behalf of Nasser al-Awlaki, the father and grandfather of Anwar and Abdulrahman and Sarah Khan, the mother of Samir Khan. The Obama administration claims "targeted killings" are completely legal. The simple explanation, as given by Attorney General Eric Holder, in a long speech last March states that: "'Due process' and 'judicial process' are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security." In the view of the Obama administration, "the Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process," Mr. Holder said. That bizarre interpretation of the Constitution is what the current lawsuit aims to challenge. "For obvious reasons the government's authority to kill people summarily without judicial process is very limited," said Jameel Jaffer, legal director of the ACLU. He admits there are some exceptions: a police officer faced with an imminent threat from an armed assailant or a soldier at war on a foreign battlefield. Both domestic and international law sanction such killing as lawful within limits. But the use of lethal force – away from an active war zone – has traditionally been limited to thwarting a grave and imminent threat, not substituting for the long, convoluted, process of charge, arrest, trial, conviction and punishment. "The questions here is whether the government is justified in killing them without charging them with anything or trying them for anything," Mr. Jaffer said, adding that the ACLU fully acknowledges the very serious allegations of terrorism against Anwar al-Awlaki. Taking a page out of the Bush playbook, Mr. Holder said legal opinions – prepared secretly because of national security implications and therefore not available – have concluded that "targeted killings" are legal. Mr. Jaffer disputes that. "While the case is complicated in some ways, ultimately it is very simple. Our argument is that when the government is killing its own citizens it has an obligation to explain why," he said. I'm from the Government and I'm Here to Kill You The True Human Cost of Official Negligence Gallup recently found that 49 percent of Americans believe that the government poses “an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens.” I’m from the Government and I’m Here to Kill You, written by a former federal attorney, shows that even the 49 percent have no idea how bad things really are. Rights and freedoms are not the only things at stake; all too often government imperils the very lives of those it supposedly serves. Federal employees have, with legal impunity, blown up a town and killed six hundred people, released staggering amounts of radioactive contamination and lied about the resulting cancer, allowed people to die of an easily treated disease in order to study their deaths, and run guns to Mexican drug cartels in hopes of expanding agency powers. Law enforcement leaders have ordered their subordinates to commit murder. Medical administrators have “cooked the books” and allowed patients to die, while raking in plump bonuses. Federal prosecutors have sent Americans to prison while concealing evidence that proved their innocence. I’m from the Government documents how we came to this pass: American courts misconstrued and expanded the old legal concept of sovereign immunity, “the king can do no wrong.” When Congress attempted to allow suits against the government, the legislators used vague language that the courts construed to block most lawsuits. The result is a legal system that allows official negligence to escape legal consequences and paradoxically punishes an agency if it tries to secure public safety. I’m from the Government ends with proposals for legal reforms that will hold the government and its servants accountable when they inflict harm on Americans. IS THERE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT A DRIVER'S LICENSE IN THE UNITED STATES? Right to Travel vs. Freedom of Movement The phrase "right to travel" should be clarified because it's commonly confused. Many cases, documents, etc. using the phrase "right to travel" are in fact about Freedom of Movement, which is the Constitutional right to travel between States at will. If anyone speaks of a "Constitutional right to travel" Freedom of Movement is the only valid thing they could be referring to, as we'll show. In pseudo-legal circles, "right to travel" means the supposed right to "travel freely in your private property / automobile / conveyance on the public roads / highways without a driver's license, insurance or registration and exempt from regulation or interruption provided one does not engage in commerce / earn profit or cause harm to people or property." Absolute freedom! Could it be true? How does the law work? Tenth Amendment, State Codes Traffic regulation isn't mentioned in the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, therefore the power generally falls to the States pursuant to the 10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. States are free to enact whatever traffic regulations they want provided they do not violate federal law, as determined by the federal courts, pursuant to their police power. All 50+ States, through their legislatures consisting of the people's elected representatives, have seen fit to devise and enact their own traffic codes and police them. Was it always this way? There wasn't always legislation displacing the common law. Automobile regulation began in the early 1900's. Here is an excellent paper that thoroughly explores the transitional period when decisions could go either way: The Orphaned Right: The Right to Travel by Automobile, 1890-1950. Bicycles were regulated decades before automobiles were invented and activists of the day faced many of the same questions and challenges modern right to travel proponents do. An analysis of that period can be found in this publication: The Impact of the Sport of Bicycle Riding on Safety Law. Constitutionality The States have all enacted traffic regulations, but do they violate federal law or the Constitution? Judging constitutionality is ultimately up to the Supreme Court pursuant to Article 3: The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. Appeals are more-often-than-not declined by the Supreme Court so adjudication may stop at the federal United States Courts of Appeals (circuit courts) or District Courts and those are a good place to look for precedent, too. We prefer citations from these federal courts to avoid presumptions of bias that might arise by the State judging its own regulations and because federal decisions are superior to State decisions pursuant to the Supremacy Clause. Federal Court Decisions Let's have a look at some federal cases on the right of States to regulate traffic. Hendrick v. Maryland 235 US 610 (1915) The movement of motor vehicles over the highways is attended by constant and serious dangers to the public, and is also abnormally destructive to the ways themselves . . . In the absence of national legislation covering the subject a State may rightfully prescribe uniform regulations necessary for public safety and order in respect to the operation upon its highways of all motor vehicles — those moving in interstate commerce as well as others. And to this end it may require the registration of such vehicles and the licensing of their drivers . . . This is but an exercise of the police power uniformly recognized as belonging to the States and essential to the preservation of the health, safety and comfort of their citizens. Hess v. Pawloski 274 US 352 (1927) Motor vehicles are dangerous machines; and, even when skillfully and carefully operated, their use is attended by serious dangers to persons and property. In the public interest the State may make and enforce regulations reasonably calculated to promote care on the part of all, residents and non-residents alike, who use its highways. Reitz v. Mealey 314 US 33 (1941) The use of the public highways by motor vehicles, with its consequent dangers, renders the reasonableness and necessity of regulation apparent. The universal practice is to register ownership of automobiles and to license their drivers. Any appropriate means adopted by the states to insure competence and care on the part of its licensees and to protect others using the highway is consonant with due process. There we have three solid federal Supreme Court decisions that set nationwide precedent that cannot be ignored. The Supreme Court is the final arbiter of law in the United States. Unless "right to travel" proponents can come up with a later Supreme Court ruling that states otherwise, their claims are busted. And we have one less-impressive but telling quote from a lower federal district court: Wells v. Malloy 402 F. Supp. 856 (1975) Although a driver's license is an important property right in this age of the automobile, it does not follow that the right to drive is fundamental in the constitutional sense. A few of the above cases were found in a somewhat inflammatory and dated but comprehensive publication, Idiot Legal Arguments. We picked out the relevant federal cases, but many more high-level State cases can be found there, too, if you're interested. There actually isn't a whole lot at the federal level because appeals beyond State courts are often denied as it has long been accepted by the federal government that traffic regulation is a proper exercise of State police power. Federal courts uphold the ability of States to regulate road traffic provided it is done so with equality, reasonableness and for public safety and doesn't violate any federal laws or rights. But I don't "drive" or use a "motor vehicle"! Those are legal terms used to enslave me and I'm smarter than that! I'm afraid the State and its courts dictate how things are viewed under its law. You don't get to decide what's considered driving or a motor vehicle, they do. You can't simply switch out a few words to avoid responsibility. If you're in territory controlled by the US and/or a State then its laws may be applied to you and you have no lawful recourse (see Law Basics). I've heard of people being ignored or let go by police, even without a license or insurance! Police have discretion. The world is a very dynamic place. There are any number of reasons why you might be passed by or allowed to proceed at any given time. The cop might be a scared rookie, not care, not want to fight, have a date, have to pee, be on lunch break, be at the end of their shift and going home – think about it – they're human, not machines. The priorities of police and prosecuting attorneys vary. The law is what it is, though, and when you understand it you know in the long run you're looking for trouble if you don't obey it. I don't like traffic regulations. What can I do? Your lawful remedy is to convince the majority of people in your State to put pressure on your elected representatives in the State legislature to change the law. That or you could move to another State or country where there are less regulations (and perhaps more fatalities). Study hard, verify claims, think for yourself, question this, comment. DID THE 14TH AMENDMENT LIMIT STATE CITIZENS' RIGHTS? The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 1, the Citizenship Clause, states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. Some claim that before the amendment was ratified State citizens were not subject to the federal United States government. The argument fails straight-away because the clause plainly states that it only applies to subjects of the United States. Anyone affected by the 14th amendment was already subject to the federal government. The federal government was merely dictating something to its subjects as anyone with subjects lawfully could. The main intent of the amendment was to have the States recognize federal subjects, particularly slaves that were considered property and not citizens in the southern slave States, and to establish equality and full civil rights across the nation. We should know that the States themselves, and thereby their constituents and properties, e.g. citizens and slaves, have been subject to the federal government since the Constitution was signed in 1788. Article 6, Clause 2 of the Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, reads: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. Therefore, State citizens may or may not have been federal citizens but were definitely subject to the United States government, at least as far as the United States government could limit the States and their members. The amendment imposed federal citizenship on State citizens that didn't have it, but did it represent a substantial loss of liberty? It is said in related Congressional documents here or here that subjects should be treated about equal with citizens as far as liberty is concerned. Therefore if a State citizen were indeed not to have US citizenship and (as subjects but not citizens) gained it by the 14th amendment, they would conceivably not suffer much, if any, loss of liberty. They would, however, gain valuable constitutional and federal protection. I want to say that the 14th amendment Citizenship Clause does not remove any rights or privileges or impose any additional duties upon State citizens that were not previously federal citizens. For the most part this appears true. As federal subjects but not citizens State citizens would seemingly be limited similarly to federal citizens. By swearing allegiance to a State that swore allegiance to the Constitution even without federal citizenship there is a substantial loss of liberty for State citizens to the federal government. Therefore I think it's safe to say that any additional duties imposed by federal citizenship would be minor. Further, the act of forcing subjects to become citizens could not conceivably be viewed as unlawful, as doing what your master says is what being a subject is all about. I wonder whether or not all State citizens automatically became federal citizens or if there was ever a sweeping grant or imposition of citizenship at some point before the 14th amendment. There were naturalization acts, people could become US citizens by residing in the US for a period of time and swearing allegiance in court, but how did the first citizens, the signers, etc., get their citizenship? Still working on it. Stay vigilant. Keep asking questions. Post a comment. IS THE UNITED STATES A FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION? A popular theory is that the United States is a for-profit corporation similar to McDonald's. A variety of arguments are used to try to support this claim. We intend to investigate those arguments, but first we need to get some fundamentals out of the way. What is a country? What is a corporation? A country, or nation-state, is a "public body corporate", a lawful entity consisting of various members. Countries are not incorporated with any superior entity – they are sovereign, answerable only to the political, economic and military force of other nations who dare oppose. In general, nations voluntarily follow principles of public international law in the interest of peace, order and mutual benefit. A standard corporation, on the other hand, similarly consists of various members but is incorporated into, under and subject to a nation-state or state and its laws. The nature and necessity of such corporations is explored at length in Blackstone's Commentaries: Of Corporations. People, men and women, human beings, whether citizens or not are not considered corporations under law, but natural persons. It is not possible to appear in law individually except as a natural person. What is the United States? The United States is a sovereign state with the Constitution as the foundational document and supreme law of the land. The United States entity, the same you see as a party in court cases, etc., was created implicitly by the Constitution. The United States is the highest entity that exists or can exist in the United States. The United States itself is not a standard corporation incorporated under any nation's laws (or its own), however the US may form and make use of various standard corporations internally. Now that we're done with the formalities, let's debunk some pseudo-legal claims! 28 USC § 3002 Definition The following definition is often claimed to be proof-positive that the United States is a corporation: (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States. First we need to understand the basics of statutory word definition. If you read the top of the section carefully you will see the words "As used in this chapter". That means those definitions only apply within that chapter of the USC, which we see here. At a glance it covers about 124 sections out of many thousand in the USC. Moreover, the definitions only apply in federal proceedings that fall under that chapter. The same definition does not apply and is not used anywhere else. So yes, for the purposes of that chapter, United States is defined as a Federal corporation. This argument is busted based on the scope of the definition alone – clearly something that applies in just one chapter of federal code can't override the entire nation. We can look further, though, to find the exact intent and reasoning behind the particular definition. From the description of the chapter we see it's related to federal debt collection procedure, which is a start. How can we quickly find out more? We can search Google Scholar to see what the courts say. Clicking the first case and checking footnotes 8 and 9 sheds much light on the topic. Apparently the definition is related to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the intent is to limit the application to dealings with federal entities. In passing the FDCPA, Congress evinced a clear intent to exclude private transactions — debts created under (and thus governed by) state law, and to which the United States was not an original party. That explains that! The District of Columbia Some believe that the creation of a municipal or state-style government subject to Congress in the District of Columbia somehow changed the government and made everything, including the Constitution (the supreme law of the land, remember) subject to that corporation. This would be quite impossible and makes no sense. The created cannot supersede its creator. No legislation from Congress, no ruling from the Supreme Court, no Executive Order can destroy or replace the Constitution or the United States. Where do the profits go? Revenue collected by the United States is managed by the United States Department of the Treasury which has a number of responsibilities. Collected monies remain in the Treasury for use within the nation. Money cannot be removed except in accordance with US law under the Constitutional framework. What say you? Do you think the United States is a "for-profit corporation"? Nation-States, Jurisdictions The highest sovereign power is the nation-state, a "public body corporate", a country in accordance with public international law. At this level there is really no binding authority or effective force to hold nations accountable. Nations may have treaties with other nations, but they are honoured voluntarily, with no repercussions other than public stigma or the potential action of an injured party in the event of a breach. While every nation is free to do things their own way, in general, next are internal states (or provinces), in accordance with national law, and [counties and] municipalities, in accordance with state law. National law trumps state law, and state law trumps regional and municipal law. Where treaties exist, international law trumps national law. Each jurisdiction, be it federal, state, county, municipal, etc., is sovereign unto itself, subject to its parent, with federal being the highest authority in the nation. In general, a federal court cannot hear a state matter, except on appeal and in accordance with state law. A federal court cannot interfere in state matters, except where they violate federal law. A state court cannot hear a federal matter at all. A county or municipal court cannot hear a state or federal matter. Applicability of Law Unless you make your own law (that nobody cares about) it is impossible to appear in law except under a nation-state. You can't contract out of national law because the contract law you're using is subject to that same nation. Likewise, you can't call citizenship a trust because there is no position or law above the nation to call it a trust from. The nation dictates how things operate and there is nothing lawful you can do about it short of leaving the area, starting your own nation and declaring war. The laws of a nation-state apply equally to everyone. Anyone in or on territory claimed by a nation is expected to conform to all the laws of the nation, state and municipality (as applicable). Where one does not wish to conform and is forced to, there is no lawful remedy one can employ to collect compensation. One can only potentially be awarded damages when federal, state or municipal laws are violated. There is no higher law as some believe. This could be viewed as an unfortunate case of might making right. Theories about what makes such a social contract legitimate vary from divine blessing to tacit acceptance by staying in a claimed area or using the products of society. Challenging Constitutionality Until such time as a superior court deems a piece of legislation unconstitutional or invalid it is in full force and effect. The way it works is this: bad laws are enacted, someone is eventually harmed, that someone now has standing to sue and challenge the law to potentially have it struck down. It is not up to individuals to determine the constitutionality of laws or declare them invalid. Only the highest courts can do this. Common Law vs. Statute Law Many seem to think common law trumps statute law. This is false. The local federal, state and municipal constitutions and legislatures are supreme. Statutes have always displaced common law, since the first English statutes. The constitution, king and parliament (or congress, state legislature or regional council) have always been stronger than the judges and courts they employ in their realm. Again, the nation-state is the highest entity in law. Sovereign states can choose to receive third party law, such as English law. English colonies automatically receive English law whereas the US received it voluntarily via reception statutes, clearly subject to local law. Local governments, being sovereign inasmuch as they do not violate higher national, state or regional law, are always able to overturn foreign law they inherited or received. Contract Law – Is silence consent? There is a common misconception based on the spongy maxim "silence is consent" that one can simply send a Notice, Affidavit, Fee Schedule or other document with a time limit for response and failing that response a binding contract is made. This is not valid contract law. According to the reigning case law (contracts remain primarily at common law), contracts cannot be established unilaterally through silence, there must be a clear offer and acceptance and meeting of the minds. The recipient failing to respond in a certain time is not binding unless there is some specific valid governing legislation or common law that dictates the same. For example, many Acts, contracts, court rules, etc. dictate that certain notices and time limits apply. UCC-1, PPSA and other Financing Statements When a document is ignored a wayward pseudolaw proponent may turn to abusing other legal processes to try to enforce their view of the law. A common method is through UCC or PPSA filings (for the US or Canada, respectively), as these are not checked for validity at the time of filing. Such filings are a direct attack on the well-being of a person and can severely affect their economic status, credit rating, etc. In some jurisdictions frivolous or vexatious filings can garner cash awards, years in jail or both. Financing statements are a form of expressing interest in collateral. In order for collateral to be properly owed to a secured party and qualify for a filing a clear contract or security agreement describing the intent and collateral must exist between the would-be secured party creditor and debtor. In the US and Canada, pursuant to UCC, PPSA or other legislation such as a Statute of Frauds, the debtor must authenticate the security agreement by signature. Where no collateral is involved, financing statements are useless and improper. For a standard contract, one would simply sue in court to obtain a judgment which would allow garnishment of income and seizure of assets. Definition of Legal Terms A common mistake is applying definitions of legal terms universally, often from an incorrect source. One might think a law dictionary is the best place to define words for use in law. This is unfortunately incorrect. The first place a court looks for a definition is in the Act related to the specific charge. If the charge is a state traffic violation, for example, the state traffic code and definitions found therein would apply. Where a word isn't defined in legislation a court might look to its own past rulings, a superior court or any number of dictionaries or other sources for suggestions before deciding for itself what a word means. Meads v. Meads A Canadian case, (Meads v. Meads, 2012 ABQB 571)-(This A PDF File 188 Pages) explores numerous pseudo-legal theories at length. It is highly recommended to read the case in full. https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.pdf IS THE UNITED STATES STILL UNDER LINCOLN'S MARTIAL LAW? Some believe Abraham Lincoln's martial law from the American Civil War is still in effect. Hostilities technically ended about a month after Lincoln's assassination, with a proclamation made by new President Johnson on May 10, 1865. armed resistance to the authority of this Government in the said insurrectionary States may be regarded as virtually at an end On April 2, 1866, another proclamation declared the insurrection at an end in all States but Texas. there now exists no organized armed resistance of misguided citizens or others to the authority of the United States in the States of Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Florida, and the laws can be sustained and enforced therein by the proper civil authority On Aug 20, 1866, a third proclamation confirmed that civil government was officially resumed in all states that had seceded from the Union. I do further proclaim that the said insurrection is at an end and that peace, order, tranquillity, and civil authority now exist in and throughout the whole of the United States of America. Ergo, Lincoln's martial law can confidently be said to be no longer in effect. The image reads ‘We kill people, who kill people, because killing people is wrong’ placed on an American flag with a woman holding a gun with her eyes and mouth taped shut. To understand the image further it is easier to break it down into the separate symbols within the image; The American Flag is traditionally a symbol of freedom, although the smeared paint of the flag may pertain to some form of blurred image, showing that the image and what it stands for is not always what it appears to be Historically women represent a caring and motherly figure, although the body language displayed (such as the gun being held firmly to her chest) depicts a cold and un-nurturing connotations Black clothing symbolises death in a lot of countries, as it is worn to funerals. Guns are often a representation of death or pain The blindfold is a symbol of silence or silencing, also a parallel may be drawn to hear no evil, speak no evil. To put simply, the best way to describe the image is simplifying a complex issue. I think that the image alludes to the use of the death penalty in America and the author’s feelings are conveyed through the tweaks made to simple symbols, such as the American flag, and that they do not agree with the death penalty, best distinguished through the words displayed on the image. A separate reading may look further into a gender based reading of the image, rather then a political stance. The use of a female, rather then a male, in comparison, gives the image a different vibe altogether. As stated above, women are symbols of love and maternity, whereas males often are associated cold and callous feelings. Her body shape could also be looked into. USA Loves To Meddle Other Countries And Coup U.S. Wars and Hostile Actions List! https://rumble.com/v2ii9fo-usa-loves-to-meddle-other-countries-and-coup-u.s.-wars-and-hostile-actions-.html A list of U.S.-backed right-wing military coups in Latin America. The U.S. has never been a country that has stood for freedom or democracy. • ⁠South Korea 1945-48 * • ⁠China 1949 to early 1960s • ⁠Greece 1947-49 * • ⁠Italy 1947-1970s • ⁠Costa Rica 1948 • ⁠Albania 1949-53 • ⁠Syria 1949 * • ⁠Korea 1950-53 • ⁠Egypt 1952 • ⁠Iran 1952-53 * • ⁠Cuba 1953 to present • ⁠Philippines 1953 • ⁠British Guiana 1953-64 * • ⁠Guatemala 1954 * • ⁠Syria 1956-57 • ⁠Indonesia 1957-59 • ⁠Vietnam 1959-75 • ⁠Lebanon • ⁠Iraq 1959 • ⁠Congo 1960-65 * • ⁠Laos 1960-75 * • ⁠Ecuador 1960-63 * • ⁠Dominican Republic 1961 * • ⁠Brazil 1961-64 * • ⁠Iraq 1963* • ⁠Chile 1964-73 * • ⁠Dominican Republic 1965-66 * • ⁠Indonesia 1965 * • ⁠Cambodia 1967-75 * • ⁠Bolivia 1971 * • ⁠Ghana 1966 * • ⁠Greece 1967 * • ⁠Costa Rica 1970-71 • ⁠Iraq 1972-75 • ⁠Australia 1973-75 * • ⁠Ethiopia 1974-91 * • ⁠Portugal 1974-76 * • ⁠Angola 1975-91 • ⁠Jamaica 1976-80 * • ⁠Zaire 1977-78 • ⁠Seychelles 1979-81 • ⁠Afghanistan 1979-89 * • ⁠Poland 1980-1989* • ⁠El Salvador 1980-1992 • ⁠Chad 1981-82 * • ⁠Grenada 1983 * • ⁠South Yemen 1982-84 • ⁠Suriname 1982-84 • ⁠Libya 1980s • ⁠Nicaragua 1981-90 * • ⁠Fiji 1987 * • ⁠Panama 1989-94 * • ⁠Bulgaria 1990 * • ⁠Albania 1991 * • ⁠Iraq 1991 • ⁠Haiti 1991 * • ⁠Somalia 1993 • ⁠Yugoslavia 1999-2000 * • ⁠Ecuador 2000 * • ⁠Afghanistan 2001 * • ⁠Venezuela 2002 * • ⁠Iraq 2003 * • ⁠Haiti 2004 * • ⁠Somalia 2007 to present • ⁠Honduras 2009 * • ⁠Libya 2011 * • ⁠Syria 2012-present • ⁠Ukraine 2014 * • ⁠Yemen 2015-present • ⁠Bolivia 2019 * • ⁠Venezuela 2019-present • ⁠United State Of America 1984-present • ⁠New World Order Year Zero ! U.S. Wars and Hostile Actions: A List There is a reason that most countries polled in December 2022 by Gallup called the United States the greatest threat to peace in the world, and why Pew found that viewpoint increased in new year 2023. Since World War II, during a supposed golden age of peace, the United States military has killed or helped kill some 20 million people, overthrown at least 36 governments, interfered in at least 86 foreign elections, attempted to assassinate over 50 foreign leaders, and dropped bombs on people in over 30 countries. The United States is responsible for the deaths of 5 million people in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, and over 1 million just since 2003 in Iraq. U.S. Government Is Selling Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us - Its Not From Mexico https://rumble.com/v2giyy1-u.s.-government-is-selling-fentanyl-laced-w-xylazine-to-kill-us-its-not-fro.html America Is Largest Drug Cartels In The World and Fentanyl Alone or Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us is a potent synthetic opioid drug approved by and sold by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an analgesic (pain relief) and anesthetic. It is approximately 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin as an analgesic. Illicitly manufactured, fentanyl is added to heroin, disguising it as highly potent heroin, so users don’t realize that the heroin they’re purchasing may contain fentanyl. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was originally developed as an analgesic – or painkiller – for surgery. It has a specific chemical structure with multiple areas that can be modified, often illicitly, to form related compounds with marked differences in potency. CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html In 1990, a failed CIA anti-drug operation in Venezuela resulted in at least 18 ton of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and sold on the streets. The incident, which was first made public in 1993, was part of a plan to assist an undercover agent to gain the confidence of a Colombian drug cartel. How the CIA Turned Us onto LSD and Heroin Secrets of America's False War on Drugs. Through in-depth interviews with academic researchers, historians, journalists, former federal agents, and drug dealers, America's Fake War on Drugs tells true tales of how, for instance, the CIA and Department of Defense helped to introduce LSD to Americans in the 1950s. "The CIA literally sent over two guys to Sandoz Laboratories where LSD had first been synthesized and bought up the world's supply of LSD and brought it back," Lappé tells Nick Gillespie in a wide-ranging conversation about the longest war the U.S. government has fought. "With that supply they began a [secret mind-control] program called MK Ultra which had all sorts of other drugs involved." Drug Enforcement Administration - Will Kill You - This Man Is Lucky - Most Time Dead https://rumble.com/v2ffnam-drug-enforcement-administration-will-kill-you-this-man-is-lucky-most-time-d.html Stephen Lara did everything right. But, as you know well, most of the time DEA or FBI or CIA or DOJ or A COP Will Kill You With Bullet To Your Head and Drive Off With Your Money. Yes even innocent people aren’t safe from U.S. Civil Forfeiture. Asset forfeiture laws is a tool in our country’s a tyrannical u.s.a. government battle against its own people and u.s.a. citizens to steal all your money and kill you, drug abuse and drug crimes, helping to shut down “pill mills” and stop rogue doctors, pharmacists, and dealers. Thousand's Dead In U.S.A. Now & Shot In Head By Police & Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuse https://rumble.com/v2fjx2g-thousands-dead-in-u.s.a.-now-and-shot-in-head-by-police-and-civil-asset-for.html New Proof That Police Use Civil Forfeiture To Take From Those Who Can’t Fight Back Nassir Geiger spoke with the wrong person at the wrong time and it cost him hundreds of dollars and his car. Nassir was a victim of Philadelphia’s predatory civil forfeiture scheme that operated from a shady “courtroom” at City Hall. For years, police and prosecutors seized cash, cars and even homes and then took the property for themselves. Worse still, new data show that the police preyed on people in minority and low-income areas—in other words, people who could least afford to fight back. Black's Is White's Law Dictionary and Read Secret Canons of Judicial Miss-Conduct Info. https://rumble.com/v2edz96-blacks-is-whites-law-dictionary-and-read-secret-canons-of-judicial-miss-con.html Rules Professional Responsibility course about various provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. This is a quick overview that hits the highlights. Video Is Good... You Can Read Court Laws and Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct Law Info. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical ! https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html Paraquat Pot The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html Almost everyone knows that the United States government sometimes operates in the shadows, but have you ever heard of how the U.S. government poisoned alcohol during prohibition? This event costed 10,000+ dead people their lives perished from such poisoning and hundreds of thousands more suffered irreversible injuries including blindness and paralysis . When the manufacture and sale of alcohol was illegal between 1920 and 1933, regulatory agencies encouraged measures making 60 Million Gallons industrial alcohol undrinkable, including the addition of lethal chemicals. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). The survey indicated that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction, a rate far higher than the 30% claimed by the manufacturer in 2000, when the survey was conducted. Sixteen percent of the survey respondents had either left the military or changed their status, at least in part because of the vaccination program. Why is the Nuremberg Code being used to oppose Covid-19 vaccines? Other Info. https://rumble.com/v2aav9u-why-is-the-nuremberg-code-being-used-to-oppose-covid-19-vaccines-other-info.html I AM running through what the Nuremberg code is how the military has crossed the line with the Chemtrails and Flouride in the water parasites being sprayed poisoning the animal live stock poisoning the food with chemical additives and paraquat pot poisoning .. Clear violation of international Law, their time is extremely limited and are being dealt with as we speak. Flying right out of military bases human trafficking out of military bases, Drug and Arms trafficking out of military bases, and underground bunkers cloning underground, cloned military personell, cloned police force, forcing corporate policy on citizens during a war when there is NO LAW during war.. so maybe everyone should start doing there job because if the people have to handle this to save time we will include you all in the same bunch consider you all accomplices and let GOD sort you all out.. Also another reason why it might be in their best interest to get right with GOD. Why is the Nuremberg Code being used to oppose Covid-19 vaccines? As the UK Covid-19 vaccine roll out has gathered pace, and the use of “vaccine passports” continue to be debated, an increasing number of social media users are voicing their opposition to these moves and claiming they are an infringement of their rights under the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical research principles, developed in the wake of Nazi atrocities—specifically the inhumane and often fatal experimentation on human subjects without consent—during World War Two. We spoke to experts in medical ethics, healthcare law and social epidemiology about the Nuremberg Code and whether its principles are applicable to the current vaccine roll out or vaccine passports. We also discussed whether the code is legally binding and the darker links the claims seem to draw between the current pandemic and the Nazi era. Ten of Thousand's Killed by U.S.A. Government + I Want Your Gun's - Killed Million+ https://rumble.com/v2a7c7q-ten-of-thousands-killed-by-u.s.a.-government-i-want-your-guns-killed-millio.html crazy conspiracy theories that actually turned out to be true and ten of thousand's killed by u.s.a. government These theories became proven fact, from a government brainwashing program, an anti-John Lennon plot to a plan to remove homosexuals from service. 15 Conspiracies That Turned Out to Be True! Are You Lost in the World Like Me ? and The Moby & The Void Pacific Choir - W0W https://rumble.com/v298af8-are-you-lost-in-the-world-like-me-and-the-moby-and-the-void-pacific-choir-w.html One of the great paradoxes of our time is this: Never have we been more connected, yet never have we been more disconnected. Professor Sherry Turkle captured this jarring juxtaposition of realities in her book title Alone Together. Now electronic music maestro Moby has a song that gets at this conundrum as well: “Are You Lost in the World Like Me?” The song asks probing questions about navigating life in our tech-obsessed, postmodern world. And the remarkable video that accompanies it adds a poignant exclamation point of its own. Our interconnected world makes many promises about making life better. But Moby’s not buying it. If anything, he suspects that things are getting worse.

crazy conspiracy theories that actually turned out to be true and ten of thousand's killed by u.s.a. government These theories became proven fact, from a government brainwashing program, an anti-John Lennon plot to a plan to remove homosexuals from service. 15 Conspiracies That Turned Out to Be True! In the “post-truth” era we live in, it seems people are likely to believe anything. Sometimes, these falsehoods have very real impacts on reality – and sometimes, they happen to be true, proving that the truth can be stranger than fiction. Here are 15 fake-sounding conspiracy theories that turned out to be true. Watergate Scandal One of the most well-known political scandals was Watergate. In the 1970s, five men broke into the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters with the intention to photograph campaign documents. They were caught, and the Nixon administration attempted to cover-up its involvement. This eventually lead to Nixon’s resignation and the indictment of 69 people who were involved in some form. Operation Paperclip After World War II, the United States created a secret Joint Intelligence Objective Agency in which they brought more than 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians – many of whom had direct ties to the Nazi Party – to work for the government. Known as Operation Paperclip, its primary focus was for the U.S. to gain an advantage in the Cold War. Operation Snow White The Church of Scientology didn’t want anything bad about them on record, and they went to criminal means to do it. Called Operation Snow White, it included an estimated 5,000 covert agents of Church members who infiltrated 136 government agencies to scrub unfavorable records about Scientology and its founder, L. Ron Hubbard. USS Iowa Turret Explosion In 1989, an explosion occurred on the USS Iowa and killed 47 of the crewman who were manning a 16-inch gun turret. To explain what happened, two investigations occurred but came to conflicting conclusions. According to the U.S. Navy, one of the crew members, Clayton Hartwig, had deliberately caused the explosion because of a homosexual relationship with a fellow crew member that went awry. After further investigation, however, the cause was concluded to be because of an excess of powder bags into the breach of the turret. The Navy never admitted to wrongdoing. Blackbox Scandal The Blackbox Scandal accused eight members of the Chicago White Sox of deliberately losing the 1919 World Series against the Cincinnati Reds, in exchange for money. After a public trial in 1921, the men were all permanently banned from professional baseball. The “Fruit Machine” The idea of “gaydar” – the ability to tell whether or not someone is gay – might seem silly nowadays, but back in 1961, it was real. At the height of the Cold War, the Canadian government hired Frank Robert Way to create a scientific test that’d determine if someone was gay. The reason for this was to identify communist sympathizers and get them out of the government. Project MKultra Project MKultra, aka the CIA’s mind control program, lasted about 20 years and was a sanctioned way for the agency to perform experiments on human subjects. Most famously, they gave people LSD to “unwitting subjects in social situations.” To administer these tests, no medical personnel was available – often, this resulted in subjects being sick for days. Gulf of Tonkin Incident The fictitious Gulf of Tonkin helped draw the United States deeper into the Vietnam War. Originally, it was claimed by the National Security Agency that the North Vietnamese Navy fired torpedo boats towards the USS Maddox on August 4, 1964. But, what was later discovered were “Tokin ghosts” (aka false radar images) and no evidence of the boats. But that didn’t matter; because the Gulf of Tonkin never happened, but was used as an excuse for the U.S. expanding warfare against North Vietnam. Bohemian Grove Every July, some of the “richest and most powerful men in the world” head to Bohemian Grove, a 2,700 acre campground in California to engage in a series of hush-hush ceremonies that also include costumes, theatre, and music. It may or may not include former U.S. presidents, oil tycoons, and other business leaders freely urinating on Redwood trees. CIA Giving Money to Tibetan Exiles Determined to undermine Communist governments, the CIA gave $1.7 million a year to Tibetan exiles in their efforts against China. This also included payments to the Dalai Lama, which amounted to $180,000 annually. “The purpose of the program,” explained in a memo written by U.S. intelligence officials, “is to keep the political concept of an autonomous Tibet alive within Tibet and among foreign nations, principally India, and to build a capability for resistance against possible political developments inside Communist China.” Abraham Lincoln’s Assassination John Wilkes-Booth is talked about in history books as being the man who killed President Abraham Lincoln. But it turns out that he didn’t act alone. Nine other people were found to assist Wilkes-Booth in some way – including a woman named Mary Surratt, who was the first woman to be executed by the United States. Human Tissue Collected for Atomic Bomb Tests “Project Sunshine” doesn’t sound so sunny when you find out what it’s about. In the 1950s, the U.S. government secretly collected human tissue – primarily from cadavers, without permission from next of kin. The purpose was to monitor the effects of radioactive fallout from nuclear weapons tests. More than 1,500 samples (many of them babies) were gathered around the world. Dr. Willard Libby, a researcher and commission member, is quoted as saying, “I don’t know how to get them [human samples], but I do say that it is a matter of prime importance to get them and particularly in the young age group. So, human samples are of prime importance, and if anybody knows how to do a good job of body snatching, they will really be serving their country.” Bayer Medicine Causes AIDS In the mid-1980s, pharmaceutical company Bayer discovered that their blood-clotting medicine for hemophiliacs carried a high risk of transmitting AIDS. They fixed the problem in 1984, but didn’t pull the dangerous product from the market. Instead, they sold it to Asia and Latin America, while Europe and the United State got the newer version. The Testimony That Helped Launch the Gulf War On October 10, 1990, a 15-year-old girl known only as Nayirah gave a tearful testimony that recounted a terrifying event; she said she witnessed Iraqi soldiers take babies out of incubators in a Kuwaiti hospital, take the incubators, and then leave the children to die. This harrowing description helped the U.S. rationalize their decision to back Kuwait in the Gulf War. But Nayirah’s testimony was proven false. She was actually the daughter of Saud Al-Sabah, the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States. Tuskegee Syphilis Study The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is one of the most infamous clinical studies in American history. Conducted between 1932 and 1972, it observed the natural progression of syphilis in black men in rural Alabama. Unfortunately, this was not known to those involved in the study – they thought they were receiving free health care from the government. The horror of 'Project Sunshine' Laughing at conspiracy theories is good fun – at least until they turn out to be true. Take the conspiracy surrounding the “Project Sunshine,” for example. In the wake of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the U.S. government commenced a major study to measure the effects of nuclear fallout on the human body. Conspiracy: The government was stealing dead bodies to do radioactive testing. The truth: The government was stealing parts of dead bodies. Because they needed young tissue, they recruited a worldwide network of agents to find recently deceased babies and children, and then take samples and even limbs – each collected without notification or permission of the more than 1,500 grieving families. The world only woke up to the the horrific scientic history of Project Sunshine half a century later. Bad booze 1920 Poisoned Alcohol Conspiracy: During Prohibition, the government poisoned alcohol to keep people from drinking. The truth: Manufacturers of industrial alcohol had been mixing their product with dangerous chemicals for years prior to Prohibition. But between 1926 and 1933, the federal government pushed manufacturers to use stronger poisons to discourage bootleggers from turning the alcohol into moonshine. That didn’t stop the bootleggers or their customers, and by the end of Prohibition, more than 10,000 Americans had been killed by tainted booze. Much of the illegal booze was sold in infamous night spots called ‘speakeasies’ – so called from the practice of speaking quietly about such a place in public, or when inside it, so as not to alert the police and neighbor's. The first lady who ran the United States Conspiracy: A stroke rendered United States President Woodrow Wilson incapable of governing, and his wife surreptitiously stepped in. The truth: Wilson did suffer a debilitating stroke towards the end of his presidency – but the government felt it was in the country’s best interest to keep things quiet. The public didn’t learn about the stroke for months, during which time his wife, Edith Wilson, was making most executive decisions. Despite Mrs. Wilson claiming that she acted only as a “steward,” historians who have analyzed the Wilson term in office confirm that for well over a year, Mrs. Wilson was effectively president. And although a woman president is yet to be formally elected to the White House, here are ten quotes from the strongest women of the real world and silver screen for inspiration in the meantime. Government mind control Conspiracy: The CIA was testing LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs on Americans in a top-secret experiment on behavior modification. The truth: The program was known as MK-ULTRA, and it was real. The CIA started by using volunteers – the novelist Ken Kesey was one notable subject. But the program heads soon began dosing people without their knowledge; MK-ULTRA left many victims permanently mentally disabled. At the present time, another drug that alters food and perception and is causing great public concern because of its harmful effects is meth. The Dalai Lama's impressive salary Conspiracy: The Dalai Lama is a CIA agent. The truth: Perhaps the reason the Dalai Lama is smiling in all those photos has something to do with the six-figure salary he pulled down from the U.S. government during the 1960s. According to declassified intelligence documents, he earned $180,000 in connection with the CIA’s funding of the Tibetan Resistance to the tune of $1.7 million per year. The idea was to disrupt and hamper China’s infrastructure. The Dalai Lama is believed to have the power to choose the body into which he is reincarnated, meaning that the current Dalai Lama is a reincarnation of the last. Today millions of people – across all religions – believe in reincarnation. John Lennon was under government surveillance Conspiracy: The FBI was spying on former Beatle John Lennon. The truth: They most certainly were. Like many counter-culture heroes, Lennon was considered a threat: “Anti-war songs, like “Give Peace a Chance” didn’t exactly endear former Beatle John Lennon to the Nixon administration,” NPR reported in 2010. “In 1971, the FBI put Lennon under surveillance, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service tried to deport him a year later.” In 1957, John Lennon and Paul McCartney met at a party in Woolton. Just yards away from their meeting place was the grave of Eleanor Rigby. A bizarre coincidence, or not? The government is spying on you Conspiracy: With the advances in technology, the government is using its vast resources to track citizens. The truth: In 2016, government agencies sent 49,868 requests for user data to Facebook, 27,850 to Google, and 9,076 to Apple, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (the EFF), a major nonprofit organisation that defends civil liberties in the digital world and advises the public on matters of internet privacy. If you are concerned about your internet privacy, we asked technology experts to give us the lowdown on the likelihood you are being watched through your computer camera. Fake battle, real war Conspiracy: The Gulf of Tonkin incident on August 2, 1964, was faked to provoke American support for the Vietnam War. The truth: By the time news reached American ears, the facts surrounding the North Vietnamese attack on the American Naval ship Maddox were already fuzzy. Declassified intelligence documents have since revealed that the Maddox had provided support for South Vietnamese attacks on a nearby island and that the North Vietnamese were responding in kind, according to the U.S. Naval Institute. The event “opened the floodgates for direct American military involvement in Vietnam.” Paraquat Pot: The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical In The 1980s When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. Big Tobacco knew that cigarettes caused cancer Conspiracy: For decades, tobacco companies buried evidence that smoking is deadly. The truth: At the beginning of the 1950s, research was showing an indisputable statistical link between smoking and lung cancer, but it wasn’t until the late 1990s that Philip Morris even admitted that smoking could cause cancer. The benefits of quitting smoking are huge: food tastes better, your mouth feels fresher and, most importantly, your risk of tobacco-related disease drops significantly. There is alien evidence in the American Southwest Conspiracy: E.T. is buried in the desert of New Mexico. The truth: This one is real: The Atari video game E.T., the Extra-Terrestrial failed so miserably that the company buried unsold cartridges in a desert landfill. (Wait, what did you think we meant? Real aliens? In New Mexico? Not yet, anyway.) Canada tried to develop 'gaydar' Conspiracy: The Canada government was so paranoid about homosexuality that it developed a “gaydar” machine. The truth: It really happened: In the 1960s, the government hired a university professor to develop a way to detect homosexuality in federal employees. He came up with a machine that measured pupil dilation in response to same-sex-erotic imagery; the Canadian government used it to exclude or fire more than 400 men from civil service, the military, and the Mounties. Fortunately, things have changed a lot since those days. The Illuminati and the U.S. government Conspiracy: A secret society that rules the world – the Illuminati – and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) are in cahoots. The truth: We’re here to tell you that a link does, in fact, exist. Of course, that “link” is actually a hyperlink (i.e., an electronic link between two Internet sites). If you type Illuminati backward – Itanimulli – into a web browser, you will land on the NSA website. Click this link if you dare: Itanimulli.com Generating foreign intelligence insights. Applying cybersecurity expertise. Securing the future. We leverage our advantages in technology and cybersecurity consistent with our authorities to strengthen national defense and secure national security systems. NSA Cybersecurity prevents and eradicates threats to U.S. national security systems with a focus on the Defense Industrial Base and the improvement of our weapons’ security. Through our Cybersecurity Collaboration Center, NSA partners with allies, private industry, academics, and researchers to strengthen awareness and collaboration to advance the state of cybersecurity.

In 1990, a failed CIA anti-drug operation in Venezuela resulted in at least 18 ton of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and sold on the streets. The incident, which was first made public in 1993, was part of a plan to assist an undercover agent to gain the confidence of a Colombian drug cartel. How the CIA Turned Us onto LSD and Heroin Secrets of America's False War on Drugs. Through in-depth interviews with academic researchers, historians, journalists, former federal agents, and drug dealers, America's Fake War on Drugs tells true tales of how, for instance, the CIA and Department of Defense helped to introduce LSD to Americans in the 1950s. "The CIA literally sent over two guys to Sandoz Laboratories where LSD had first been synthesized and bought up the world's supply of LSD and brought it back," Lappé tells Nick Gillespie in a wide-ranging conversation about the longest war the U.S. government has fought. "With that supply they began a [secret mind-control] program called MK Ultra which had all sorts of other drugs involved." The cover the history of drug prohibition, the rise of the '60s drug counterculture; heroin epidemics past and present; how drug policy has warped U.S. foreign policy in Southeast Asia, Central America, Afghanistan, and beyond; the bipartisan politics of prohibition; and much more. America's Fake War on Drugs features exclusive and rarely seen footage and documents how, time and time again, the government was often facilitating trade and use in the very drugs it was trying to false stamp out. The new world order adds short videos, and more information in an attempt to produce an "immersive experience" that will change how viewers think and feel about prohibition. Though is that knowledge and reason will eventually win out over keeping things in the dark, making things taboo." Even when it veers off into questionable territory (such as the role of the government in creating the crack epidemic of the 1980s), America's False War on Drugs performs the invaluable function of furthering a conversation about drug policies and attitudes that have caused far more harm than they have alleviated. We take a very critical look at the entire history of the war on drugs. In particular, looking at American foreign policy and how the Central Intelligence Agency is not just been involved in a couple of bad apples here and there. In couple rogue operations as a lot of these drug trafficking allegations have been called before. But actually very directly involved in drug trafficking not only drug trafficking but in the largest drug trafficking stories of our time. Whether that's in the secret tests that introduced LSD to the United States or heroin during the late 60's and early 70's from southeast Asia, to cocaine during the late 70's and early 80's onto opium and heroin coming out of Afghanistan. There's a huge story to be told there about the actual extent of the US government's involvement in drug trafficking. Gillespie: Let's talk first about the old days of MK Ultra and mind control and the way that the CIA actually helped introduce LSD evolved drugs into America, to American minds. What was going on in the 50's with the CIA and how did they become involved in introducing LSD to Americans? Lappe: This is a story that a lot of your listeners may have heard about, people have heard about MK Ultra and I had as well, but I never really understood the full origins of the story. They go all the way back to the 1950's. During the 1950's of course, US and the Soviet Union are locked in a battle for hearts and minds around the world and psychoactive drugs were a big part of the Cold War psychological warfare programs on both sides. The CIA had heard rumors that the Soviet Union was starting to use LSD at this point as a truth serum to see if they could break spies and get them to expose details, admit they were spies et cetera. The CIA literally sent over two guys to Sandoz Laboratories where LSD had first been synthesized and bought up the world's supply of LSD and brought it back. With that supply they began a program called MK Ultra which had all sorts of other drugs involved. In particular they started doing secret tests around the country. Some of them using in veteran's hospitals and through the military. Others were in mental hospitals, a lot of basic, pretty much a lot of them were unwitting people, mental patients. But one of the incredible stories we found, I never knew this before, is that Ken Kesey, famously the author of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest and really the guy who started the famous acid tests in the San Francisco Bay area, it was really the godfather of acid movement. As a Stanford grad student, or sorry an undergrad, was part of a test at the Menlo Park Veteran's hospital. Loved it so much that he got a job in the lab, stole all the acid, went up to San Francisco and started his acid test. That was the origins of how LSD was introduced into United States. This was also happening in other places around the country. It was just that Ken Kesey was the progenitor of the entire movement. It literally was the CIA. Gillespie: That is a real challenge to all good thinking Libertarians like myself. Small L Libertarians who say that the government can never do anything right. The manage to strangely change the course, not of, I guess maybe of Cold War history, but certainly of American cultural history through their actions. The first episode of the series, and again check these out on history.com, the History Channel if you have, you can download their app and take a look at it. Plus there's other material there that's well worth delving into. You look at the prehistory of Richard Nixon's declaration of a war on drugs in the early 70's, what were some of the motivating factors you found behind Nixon declaring war on drugs? Very early in the 70's he talked about, famously used the phrase, declaring a war on drugs, that illegals drugs were the number one enemy facing America. What was going on, things like pot and acid and heroin rose to that level of attention from the federal government? Lappe: You really had two strains happening. You had the psychedelic movement which was heavily influenced by acid which the CIA itself had introduced, which is just my blowing right. Then you had pot as well which basically increasing numbers of young people were smoking. Nixon declares famously this war on drugs in June 1971. At the same time there was a massive heroin epidemic that really was ravaging mostly the eastern seaboard. What a lot people don't realize is that too in part, you could argue another case of blow back from our own operations. During the mid 60's to late 60's there was a famous, everyone knows, a war against communist forces in Vietnam but also next door there was a gigantic secret war happening in Laos that officially we were not supposed to be fighting. Both politically it was radioactive for Johnson to declare another front but there were also treaties that said that we couldn't have troops on the ground both with Laos and we had an agreement, a sort of tacit agreement with the Soviet Union they wouldn't put troops on the ground. There was a massive clandestine CIA operation in Laos running this secret war. People have probably heard of this CIA airline called Air America. Basically we go into business helping a local warlord named Vang Pao. When we started the war in the mid 60's, around 65, Vang Pao was a sort of somewhat populous, anti-communist leader of the Hmong hill people in Laos and was peripherally involved in growing opium because that's really what the cash crop was in that area. By 1968, 1969 into 1970 Vang Pao was the biggest heroin trafficker on the planet. Some of his partners were the Sicilian mobsters that we had gone into business to put in Havana Cuba and south Florida to try to kill Fidel Castro. Basically we had created this huge network or aided this huge network of international drug trafficking that created a massive heroin epidemic which has only been surpassed by the current opioid crisis and we go into that later. What happens is, there's all this heroin in the theater of war in southeast Asia, a lot of troops are getting hooked, famously they all start bringing this heroin back and heroin really starts devastating the inner city and there was a legitimate belief by a lot of people that really it was out of control and crime rates were really skyrocketing especially in cities like New York. So Nixon was under a lot of pressure. He had run in 1960 under the banner of law and order and the country was literally falling apart by 1971 in his eyes. Gillespie: As you were saying, the crime really ratcheted up. It started in the 50's but it really ratcheted up in the 60's, there was the perception that people were leaving cities in droves to avoid crime. You talk, I think, in the first episode, it's something that in 1960 the government figures had something like 50,000 heroin addicts around the country or heroin users and it had crept up to something like 200,000 or 500,000 by about 1970. Lappe: Yeah. Gillespie: Part of it Nixon was a law and order guy and there's, you go into this a bit at your site as well as in the show that John Ehrlichman one of Richard Nixon's chief lieutenants in a 1990, 94 interview with Dan Baum who ultimately published a story in Harper's about this, that he said that the war on pot and the war on drugs was really a way to control black people. There was also this sense that the urban American was going to hell in a hand basket as well. Follow up question for that is, the war on drugs gets birthed out of mixed feeling and Nixon and there's some footage in one of the episodes of Ronald Reagan denouncing the use of acid in the 60's and obviously became drug warrior himself as president. There was a strong bipartisan element to the war on drugs because even people, Jimmy Carter seemed to be okay with the idea of pot legalization or decriminalization until events overtook him and he became a staunch drug warrior. People like Bill Clinton, people like Barack Obama also added to the drug war. What is the, I guess that's a long wind up for a pretty simple question, what is it about the war on drugs that pulls such support from Democrats and Republicans across the board? Lappe: I think this is pretty deep question because I think it goes to what I found in working on this project which is really one of the most epic projects I've ever worked on in my life in terms of the amount of research we did. I think drugs have always played a scapegoat role in our society where we see other social forces, in particular economic forces and other things that have been pressures on communities and it's very easy to point the finger at drugs. In some ways it's a natural reaction to try to crack down on them in the harshest way. Of course by cracking down on drugs are an inanimate object, there is no such thing as a crack down on drugs. You're cracking down on people. And when you crack down on people, that has a reverberating effect. It also can be used as a tool. Nixon is probably one of the most cynical politicians in our history but maybe not the worst in my opinion. He saw it purely, in my opinion, as a political move. As a way to take out this, he believed he had all these enemies that were growing around him, all these social movements, you had black nationalism, you had increasingly radicalized hippie movement that had turned from a peacenik movement into a more dangerous, whether underground type of operations. There was a feeling that society was unraveling to some degree. That was in large part because it was because we lived in a oppressive racist society and there was a war that in 1968, everyone knew was at a stalemate or that we had lost but continued going on. People don't realize half the people died, of our soldiers after 1968 when Nixon ran under this completely cynical lie that he had a secret plan to end the war [Editor's note: Journalism historian Joseph W. Campbell has documented that Candidate Nixon never publicly made such a pledge, which continues to be cited frequently.]. There was all these other forces going on in drugs were very easy way to demonize people. Gillespie: At the website, at history.com, among the various things you have in timelines or whatnot that are worth going back to. The early attempts to link cocaine with black people and if you want to crack down on cocaine because white women may be taking it or something, you crack down on black people. When pot became illegal, under federal law, became effectively illegal in the 1930's, it was identified with Mexicans. Chinese and opium was a problem. It is fascinating in the 60's you have with something like LSD the youth movement and hippies and then again when ecstasy which was made illegal in the 80's thanks in large part to Joe Biden. The identification of a subculture or subgroup or a particular ethnic group that you can crack down on is one of the really haunting elements, I think, of the drug war and that comes through in this, in this series. Talk a bit about how particularly after 9/11 part of the series, and I think you're absolutely right in looking at it, that what this does in a way that is really fresh and interesting is look at how foreign policy, US foreign policy has been both guided and infected by the drug war. Talk a bit about the post 9/11 era and how have fears of narco-terrorism really changed the way we go about our foreign policy? Lappe: Narco-terrorism is a term that started, that was introduced after 9/11, shortly after really. We show how in the first Superbowl after 9/11, the Partnership for Drug Free America began running this very eerie infamous ad now where you had a bunch of kids saying, "I supported terrorists, I supported a suicide bomber, I did this." Basically saying because I did drugs I was helping all of these different terrorists groups et cetera. When the incredible irony is that our own government has been knee deep in drug trafficking for decades. There was a big push though it was completely ironic and what we show in our last episode which is the post 9/11 era, is we actually have an undercover DEA agent. This was a huge theme that we saw throughout our series was the tension between the DEA and the CIA. I'll paint the picture of what was happening in Afghanistan. In the late 1990's, opium has always been one of or the biggest cash crop in Afghanistan. During the 1990's there was a massive civil war. All sides were using opium to finance themselves. The Taliban comes in to power and starts taxing at first, opium growers but by the late 90's the Taliban is having a huge PR problem. They're chopping off women's heads in stadiums and they're blowing up the Buddhas. They were becoming an international pariah. They pulled this incredible PR coup where they said they were cracking down on opium. When really all they were doing were stockpiling it. Basically they launched this whole fake crackdown that got the UN off their back. The US, we even in 2000, sent them $40 million of aid money to help, quote unquote, crackdown on opium. But really what was happening was they were stockpiling opium and then after 9/11 used those stockpiles to ramp up their war effort. At the time of 9/11, Afghanistan was about 30% of the world's heroin. Today it's about 90%. What Afghanistan has become is a drug war. People never talk about it in that context but Afghanistan is a giant drug war. The Taliban have, to quote REM, lost their religion. They're really are not much of a religious force any more as they are just any other militant insurgency group that is trying to take down a government. There isn't much, they're not putting a lot of effort into their Sharia program. They basically have become gigantic drug traffickers. But also our allies in Afghanistan. Including in the early days, Hamid Karzai's brother, Wali Karzai was the biggest heroin trafficker and drug lord who controlled all the traffic in Kandahar. Who was completely protected by the CIA. I talked to soldiers who literally their job was to guard the opium fields of our local warlord allies. This heroin has had a major impact on the world's drug stage. It should be noted a lot of the heroin that comes into the United States is coming from Mexico now but a lot of it is coming from Afghanistan, especially on the east coast and in Canada. It's a really incredible story that no one really talks about. There's a great reporter that is one of our contributors to the show named, Gretchen Peters, wrote a book called, Seeds of Terror. That essentially is her thesis. We also have great stories about the undercover DEA agents who were fighting to try to take down drug traffickers at the same time the CIA was undermining their efforts. Gillespie: It's a phenomenal drama that unfolds and it has these dark, rich, historical ironies that abound throughout the series. The odds are good now at least and actually in a story that's up at the website, you guys talk about Jeff Sessions, the Attorney General under Donald Trump. Who has really, he's pledged to really redouble efforts at least domestically, on the war on drugs which you guys point out at least in it's Nixonian phase has been going on for 50 years. It's really more like a 100 years when you go all the way back to things like the Harrison Narcotics Act. It's failing, it doesn't seem to have much effect on drug usage rates, they seem to be independent of enforcement, there's obviously problems with surgeon opiod use that is it's own tangled web of unintended consequences and weird interventions into markets. At the same time the odds are phenomenal that pot is going to be fully legal in the US within the next decade if not before. During the campaign, weirdly Donald Trump seemed to be at times okay with the idea of different states deciding what kind of marijuana policies, obviously the Sessions factors a big difference from that. Are you optimistic that we're at least entering the beginning of the end of the drug war, to borrow a terrible Vietnam phrase that there's light at the end of the tunnel in terms of American attitudes towards currently illegal drugs, and rethinking the drug war? Lappe: There's no doubt that things are moving in that direction in the same way there's no doubt that things like gay rights and LGBT rights are moving in a certain direction. Jeff Sessions essentially is a weird outlier, historical blip, as you said, to try to pin Trump down on any one ideology or stance is literally impossible. He said we were going to stop all our foreign wars, yet he's sending 8,000 more troops in Afghanistan. Whatever Trump has said on the war on drugs is sort of irrelevant. But Sessions is just a weird dinosaur throwback to another era that I think is just going to be, if he survives the next three years. Will just be a blip in the road towards eventually people moving, starting with marijuana towards legalization both for, at least, nationwide to medicinal use if not most states towards recreational use. Because people are seeing that it doesn't really have any negative effects, there isn't really a gigantic increase in use and there's great benefits to society in terms of being able to tax it and make it a normalized thing. I think a big part of the problem with drugs and Dr. Carl Hart at Columbia is one of the most iconoclastic guys on this and he's in our series, he's out on the far fringes of this. But what he really says is, the problem with drugs is not drugs. The problem is drug use and misuse and people being idiots with drugs and not knowing how to use them. Gillespie: But it's hard to know how to use them if you're not allowed to freely and openly discuss the facts, your experiences, your parents, we have enough problems with alcohol abuse and that's fully legal. When you start talking about these other drugs it's hard to get good information. Lappe: Right. It's the same thing with these abstinence programs. You see wherever there's abstinence programs there's more STD's, there's more pregnancies because people are ignorant. I think that's a great trait of libertarianism even though I don't believe in everything you guys believe in. Is that knowledge and reason will eventually win out over keeping things in the dark, making things taboo. I think that people are rational and when it comes … There's always going to be people who are going to abuse something, just the same way people abuse alcohol or any substance. I think there is a general consensus that we're moving in a particular direction and I think that ultimately it's going to be better for society. Provisional data from CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics indicate that there were an estimated 100,306 drug overdose deaths in the United States during 12-month period ending in April 2021, an increase of 28.5% from the 78,056 deaths during the same period the year before. The new data documents that estimated overdose deaths from opioids increased to 75,673 in the 12-month period ending in April 2021, up from 56,064 the year before. Overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) and psychostimulants such as methamphetamine also increased in the 12-month period ending in April 2021. Cocaine deaths also increased, as did deaths from natural and semi-synthetic opioids (such as prescription pain medication). The provisional data presented in this visualization include: the reported and predicted (estimated) provisional counts of deaths due to drug overdose occurring nationally and in each jurisdiction; a U.S. map of the percentage changes in provisional drug overdose deaths for the current 12-month ending period compared with the 12-month period ending in the same month of the previous year, by jurisdiction; and the reported and predicted provisional counts of drug overdose deaths involving specific drugs or drug classes occurring nationally and in selected jurisdictions. The reported and predicted provisional counts represent the numbers of deaths due to drug overdose occurring in the 12-month periods ending in the month indicated. These counts include all seasons of the year and are insensitive to variations by seasonality. Deaths are reported by the jurisdiction in which the death occurred. Drug overdoses now kill more than 100,000 Americans a year — more than vehicle crash and gun deaths combined. Our Own Government Sale Drugs To Kill US Overdose/Deaths. Researchers think LSD flashbacks may happen during times of increased stress. Project MK-Ultra, the code name given to a Central Intelligence Agency program that began in the 1950s and lasted through the 1960s, is sometimes known as part of the CIA’s “mind control program and the Central Intelligence Agency Sold over 6 Millon+ Hit of Acid to the u.s.a. People in the 1950 thur 1973 These government acid experiments—which also sold millon's of hits or tabs of acid involved dozens of universities, pharmaceutical companies and medical facilities—took place throughout the 1950s and 1960s, before LSD was deemed too unpredictable to use in the field. When Project MK-Ultra became public knowledge in the 1970s, the scandal resulted in numerous lawsuits and a congressional investigation headed by Senator Frank Church. After volunteering to take part in Project MKUltra as a student at Stanford University, Ken Kesey, author of the 1962 novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, went on to promote the use of LSD. In the early 1960s, Kesey and the Merry Pranksters (as his group of followers were called) hosted a series of LSD-fueled parties in the San Francisco Bay area. Kesey called these parties “Acid Tests.” Acid Tests combined drug use with musical performances by bands including the Grateful Dead and psychedelic effects such as fluorescent paint and black lights. Both psychology professors at Harvard University, Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert administered LSD and psychedelic mushrooms to Harvard students during a series of experiments in the early 1960s. At the time, neither of these substances (Gov. Sales of over 6 Millon hits of acid) were illegal in the United States. (The U.S. federal government didn’t outlaw LSD until 1968.) Leary and Alpert documented the effects of the hallucinogenic drugs on the students’ consciousness. The scientific community, however, criticized the legitimacy of the studies which Leary and Alpert conducted while also tripping. Both men were eventually dismissed from Harvard but went on to become symbols of the psychedelic drug and hippie counterculture. Paraquat Pot: The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical In The 1980s When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. Our Own Government with Oliver North Worked With Cocaine Traffickers to Arm Terrorists Along with a Other U.S.A. leading role in the Iran/Contra scandal - in which North helped sell arms to Iran to fund the Contra War - North is also said to have employed air and sea transport companies moonlighting as drugs carriers. A series of expose articles in the San Jose told tales of a drug triangle during the 1980s that linked CIA officials in Central America, the U.S.A. Gov. Own Air Forces fly tons of drugs in and fly guns and arms out to Central America and Sold Tons of Drugs to a San Francisco drug ring and a Los Angeles drug dealer. According to the stories, the CIA and its operatives used crack cocaine--sold via the Los Angeles African-American community--to raise 100s millions dollars to support the agency's clandestine operations in Central America. Now its very funny again the CIA/FBI Our Government is Sell Drugs Again. The U.S. drug epidemic reached another terrible milestone Wednesday when the government announced that more than 100,000 people had died of overdoses between April 2020 and April 2021. It is the first time that drug-related deaths have reached six figures in any 12-month period. Overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) and psychostimulants such as methamphetamine also increased with are own government help with Mexico and China were the primary source for fentanyl trafficked by our own government and u.s. navy and u.s. air forces flights out of hong kong area into the u.s.a. by land and sea and balloons for years now per the National Center for Health Statistics 2022. President Biden on Wednesday released a statement mourning the more than 100,000 Americans who died last year from drug overdoses — without mentioning U.S.A. and China is helping us with leading role exporting fentanyl, which drove the 29 percent annual increase in deaths but lower then planned. Nearly two-thirds of deaths were caused by fentanyl and related synthetic opioids that can kill a person at extremely low doses. Fentanyl is increasingly added to non-opioid drugs such as cocaine and counterfeit prescriptions. In some areas of New York City, including the Bronx and the North Shore of Staten Island, more than 75 percent of overdose deaths involved fentanyl. “Today, new data reveal that our nation has reached a tragic milestone: more than 100,000 lives were lost to the overdose epidemic from April of last year to April of this year,” Biden said. “As we continue to make strides to defeat the COVID-19 pandemic, we cannot overlook this epidemic of loss, which has touched families and communities across the country”. Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://rumble.com/v2dye2c-covid-19-blood-and-non-vaccines-blood-and-secret-pedophiles-blood-bank-u.s..html https://rumble.com/v2cjoog-a-dangerous-new-zombie-drug-is-taking-over-american-streets-and-million-wil.html https://rumble.com/v2auj9m-a-organ-donor-card-will-get-you-killed-very-fast-as-a-doctors-will-sell-you.html https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html https://rumble.com/v2anz0m-conspiracy-revealed-our-own-government-sale-drugs-to-kill-us-overdosedeaths.html https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html https://rumble.com/v2a7zkq-these-most-dangerous-conspiracy-theory-in-the-world-that-turned-out-to-be-t.html https://rumble.com/v2a7ugy-top-secret-government-conspiracy-revealed-government-secrets-and-cover-ups-.html https://rumble.com/v2a7kly-i-kill-you-is-it-china-russia-who-its-your-own-u.s.a.-government-who-kill-y.html https://rumble.com/v2a7c7q-ten-of-thousands-killed-by-u.s.a.-government-i-want-your-guns-killed-millio.html https://rumble.com/v2a5yvw-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true-u.s.a.-government-lies-again.html https://rumble.com/v29orjq-welcome-to-the-satellite-hoax-man-excellent-music-an-video-from-flat-earth-.html https://rumble.com/v28zp34-fast-and-furious-how-it-went-down-about-122000-firearms-sold-over-10000-peo.html https://rumble.com/v28z52a-agent-killed-in-fast-and-furious-gun-operation-and-1000-more-now-dead-2022.html https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html

Paraquat Pot The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. Paraquat is an organic acid that is used as an herbicide. It kills green plant tissue on contact. • When sprayed on plants, paraquat is tasteless and odorless and invisible. In other words, you wouldn’t be able to tell if the weed you were smoking had been sprayed with paraquat. • As far as breathable poisons go, the government has placed paraquat in Toxicity Category I—the highest possible level. • Due to the fact that it is cheap and available, liquid paraquat is frequently used in suicides throughout much of the Third World. • In humans, exposure to paraquat has been linked to the development of Parkin’s disease. • Depending on the dose and the method of ingestion, paraquat can either be immediately fatal or can lead to kidney, liver, lung, and heart failure for up to 30 days after exposure. • Tests performed in 1977 demonstrated that combusted paraquat caused damage to the lungs of laboratory rats. • In 1978, after years of attempting to reassure Americans that smoking paraquat-tainted marijuana was safe, US Secretary of Health Education and Welfare Joseph Califano announced that new tests found that heavy smokers of tainted weed could develop irreversible lung damage and that even moderate users could develop “clinically measurable damage.” 1970s: Paraquat Pot From Mexico Comes To The USA In 1969, the Nixon White House made marijuana eradication a top priority. Rather than attempting to stop the flow of drugs in through the border, scientists began looking for a way to directly contaminate the marijuana itself. They originally developed a spray that was intended to make users nauseous, but this was shelved. In 1975, as part of “Operation Clearview,” the Nixon Administration started supplying Mexico with about $15 million annually in aid that included helicopters designed to spray marijuana and poppy fields with herbicides. Officials had recommended spraying marijuana fields with herbicides—their stated intent was to kill the drug at its source by spraying the fields. But in deeply impoverished Mexico, where in the 1970s harvesting marijuana could make the difference between a yearly income of $200 and one of $5,000, many growers simply harvested the poisoned marijuana and shipped it north anyway. According to one report, an American helicopter pilot was getting high on prime Oaxacan weed while he was spraying fields below him with paraquat. According to one study in 1978, 13 percent of marijuana samples texted in the southwestern USA were contaminated with paraquat. Other tests found that anywhere from 20 to 30 percent of the marijuana that had made its way into the US from Mexico was paraquat-tainted. Some samples contained concentrations of paraquat that were 40,000 times higher than the recommended domestic use. This led to a public panic, seeing as how marijuana may have been even more popular in the 1970s than it is now. Fly-by-night businesses made a killing by offering to test if your marijuana had been sprayed with paraquat. A running joke among stoner comedians was that they would welcome if you’d send them your marijuana to sample for paraquat. To circumvent the national outrage—which observers noted had been the first time that American students were really pissed off about something since the early 1970s—the government began rolling out plans to at least make paraquat pot detectable to the senses. There were suggestions about releasing a red dye along with the paraquat. Then there were plans to also use an extract of orange peel in the paraquat spray, which the State Department explained would give pot smokers ““the foulest‐smelling joint or brownie they ever had.” It took a 1978 lawsuit from the National Organization to Reform Marijuana Laws to force the US Government to suspend funding for paraquat-spraying in Mexico until a comprehensive health study of its effects could be performed. 1980s: Reagan Administration Sprays Crops in Georgia A scandal erupted in the state of Georgia in 1983 when it was uncovered that law enforcement officials had aided in smuggling drugs from south of the border into the USA. They had also facilitated the planting and cultivation of giant weed farms in Georgia’s Chattahoochee Forest. In retaliation, the Reagan Administration ordered US helicopters to spray these weed plantations with paraquat and the DEA vowed to extend the practice to wherever weed was being grown in the USA. For many, purposely damaging the lungs of pot smokers—perhaps fatally—was a punishment that far exceeded the crime. One critic likened the practice to placing land mines in NO PARKING zones. Luckily, the practiced was quickly banned due to lawsuits filed based on environmental concerns. Then in 1988, the DEA announced that it would resume spraying marijuana fields with the deadly substance. The feds terminated this practice in the 1990s but paraquat remains one of the most commonly used herbicides on the market. These days it is generally agreed that marijuana use is generally safe. In hindsight, the paraquat scare of the 1970s and 1980s seems like a case of “Reefer Madness” gone wild. It is unknown how many Americans were disabled or even killed by this sick and hysterical government policy. It is bitterly ironic that the same government which had for decades tried to insist that marijuana was bad for you had finally found a way to make it bad for you. With pop culture influences like Pink Floyd, The Grateful Dead, and Led Zeppelin, the 1970s ushered in a new perspective on drugs. From rock-n-roll to disco, Cheech & Chong to Hunter S. Thompson, the 70s, anti-establishment counterculture helped shape the history of marijuana as we know it. As hippies faded into the sixties, Nixon started the infamous "War on Drugs," and a new era of marijuana subculture began. During the 1970s, troops returned from the Vietnam war, and cannabis strains from around the world started cropping up (pun intended), in the U.S. black market. As cannabis breeders and consumers pushed for stronger weed, selective breeding and cross-breeding for decades changed cannabis over the years. Many of these classic, old-school 1970’s marijuana strains are rare, but some are still available at your local dispensary, albeit likely quite a bit stronger than you remember. So, queue up your 70s playlist, pull up a bean bag, and turn on a lava lamp, then let's take a walk down memory lane and review a few of the most popular 1970’s marijuana strains from four decades ago, their origins, and how they helped shape the future of the cannabis industry Before the discovery of hydroponics, selective breeding, and advanced growing techniques, marijuana strains were not the powerful, potent strains of today. Supporting this theory, recent reports show 1970’s marijuana strains averaged between 1-4 percent, while the average THC content in strains today is around 13 percent with some of the most potent strains reaching between 25 and 30 percent. On the other hand, others believe there's no accurate way to make that comparison. Opponents claim many of the high-potency, premium cannabis strains, and products of the 70s were ignored or went untested in many cases, thus making any test averages inaccurate. Many of the common 1970’s marijuana strains likely produced just as much THC then as they do today. Like ancestry and genetics paint a picture of our biological origins, as cannabis products, strains, and even consumers continue to evolve, we mustn't lose sight of our roots. These classic 1970’s marijuana strains, along with a few talented breeders, contributed to the wide variety of strains and products available in legal markets across the nation. Without a doubt, we can thank this psychedelic decade for planting the seeds which grew into the cannabis industry we know and love today.

The CIA has been conducting mass surveillance in the U.S. with minimal oversight and the program’s uncovering is bad news for Big Tech ? U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear New World Order Challenge to NSA Mass Surveillance. Call on Congress to Limit the NSA’s Surveillance of Internet Communications. The U.S. Supreme Court today denied the New World Order petition for review of its legal challenge to the National Security Agency’s (NSA) “Upstream” surveillance program. Under this program, the NSA systematically searches the contents of internet traffic entering and leaving the United States, including Americans’ private emails, messages, and web communications. The Supreme Court’s denial leaves in place a divided ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which dismissed New World Order case based on the government’s assertion of the “state secrets privilege.” Supreme Court’s refusal to grant our petition strikes a blow against an individual’s right to privacy and freedom of expression — two cornerstones of our society and the building blocks of New World Order Petition as “We will continue to champion everyone’s right to free knowledge, and urge Congress to take on the issue of mass surveillance as it evaluates whether to reauthorize Section 702 later this year.” Upstream surveillance is conducted under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which permits the government to intercept Americans’ international communications without a warrant, so long as it is targeting individuals located outside the U.S. for foreign intelligence purposes. Section 702 will expire later this year unless it is reauthorized by Congress. In the course of this surveillance, both U.S. residents and individuals located outside the U.S. are impacted. The NSA copies and combs through vast amounts of internet traffic, including private data showing what millions of people around the world are browsing online, from communications with friends and family to reading and editing knowledge on projects. Governments are increasingly purchasing sophisticated technology to monitor their citizens’ behavior on social media. Once the preserve of the world’s foremost intelligence agencies, this form of mass surveillance has made its way to a range of countries, from major authoritarian powers to smaller or poorer states that nevertheless hope to track dissidents and persecuted minorities. The booming commercial market for social media surveillance has lowered the cost of entry not only for the security services of dictatorships, but also for national and local law enforcement agencies in democracies, where it is being used with little oversight or accountability. Coupled with an alarming rise in the number of countries where social media users have been arrested for their legitimate online activities, the growing employment of social media surveillance threatens to squeeze the space for civic activism on digital platforms. Social media surveillance refers to the collection and processing of personal data pulled from digital communication platforms, often through automated technology that allows for real-time aggregation, organization, and analysis of large amounts of metadata and content. Broader in scope than spyware, which intercepts communications by targeting specific individuals’ devices, social media surveillance cannot be dismissed as less invasive. Billions of people around the world use these digital platforms to communicate with loved ones, connect with friends and associates, and express their political, social, and religious beliefs. Even when it concerns individuals who seldom interact with such services, the information that is collected, generated, and inferred about them holds tremendous value not only for advertisers, but increasingly for law enforcement and intelligence agencies as well. Governments have long employed people to monitor speech on social media, including by creating fraudulent accounts to connect with real-life users and gain access to networks. Authorities in Washington dc area have boasted of a 42,000-strong army of sex slave volunteers who monitor online speech. Any citizen can report for duty on the Cyber Police ( AI-NWO) website. Similarly, the ruling Communist Party in China and Russia has recruited thousands of individuals to sift through the internet and report problematic content and accounts to authorities. The market for social media surveillance has grown, giving intelligence and law enforcement agencies new tools for combing through massive amounts of information. At least 40 of the 65 countries covered by this report have instituted advanced social media monitoring programs. Moreover, their use by governments is accelerating: in 15 of these countries, it was only in the past year that such programs were either expanded or newly established. Justifying their efforts in the name of enhancing security, limiting disinformation, and ensuring public order, governments have effectively co-opted social media platforms. While these platforms typically present themselves as social connectors and community builders, state agencies in repressive countries see them as vast storehouses of speech and personal information that can be observed, collected, and analyzed to detect and suppress dissent. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have opened up new possibilities for automated mass surveillance. Sophisticated monitoring systems can quickly map users’ relationships through link analysis; assign a meaning or attitude to their social media posts using natural-language processing and sentiment analysis; and infer their past, present, or future locations. Machine learning enables these systems to find patterns that may be invisible to humans, while deep neural networks can identify and suggest whole new categories of patterns for further investigation. Whether accurate or inaccurate, the conclusions made about an individual can have serious repercussions, particularly in countries where one’s political views, social interactions, sexual orientation, or religious faith can lead to closer scrutiny and outright punishment. The social media surveillance tools that have appeared in democracies got their start on foreign battlefields and in counterterrorism settings, designed to monitor acute security threats in places like New World Order. Many US data-mining companies received seed money from the Central Intelligence Agency through its In venture capital fund. While authorities in the past typically justified the use of these tools with the need to combat serious crimes such as terrorism, child sexual abuse, and large-scale narcotics trafficking, law enforcement and other agencies at the local, state, and federal levels are increasingly repurposing them for more questionable practices, such as screening travelers for their political views, tracking students’ behavior, or monitoring activists and protesters. This expansion makes oversight of surveillance policies more difficult and raises the risk that constitutionally protected activities will be impaired. For example, in the United States, agencies within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)—including Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—have used automated technology to collect and analyze personal information, with limited oversight and transparency. By claiming that its power to conduct warrantless searches extends within a 100-mile radius of any US border, DHS has effectively asserted extrajudicial surveillance powers over 200 million people. CBP has even purchased technology from Cellebrite, an Israeli company, to bypass encryption and passwords and enable quick extraction of data from phones and computers, including social media content. There has been a spike in device searches at the borders in recent years; the number of such searches, normally limited under the Fourth Amendment of the constitution, increased by 292 percent, from 8,503 to 33,295, between fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2018. Over that same period, inbound travel to the United States increased by less than 3 percent. These searches have become part of the government’s drive toward big data surveillance. The resulting information is frequently deposited in massive multiagency databases where it can be combined with public records, secret intelligence materials, and datasets (including social media data) assembled by private companies. In one case, ICE paid the data analytics company Palantir $42.3 million for a one-year contract related to FALCON, a custom-built database management tool. Its “Search and Analysis System” enables agents to analyze trends and establish links between individuals based on information gathered during border searches, purchased from private data brokers, and obtained from other intelligence collection exercises. Similar tools developed by Palantir are used by some 300 police departments in the state of California alone, as well as by police forces in Chicago, Los Angeles, New Orleans, and New York City. Many of these programs are facilitated through DHS and its Regional Intelligence Centers. The chilling effect on free expression caused by increased surveillance is well documented. Activists and journalists who might otherwise hold governments to account for wrongdoing are more inclined to self-censor, while dissidents and members of marginalized communities will think twice about discussing their political opinions online to avoid arrests or travel restrictions. Furthermore, social media monitoring designed to quell mobilization and identify protesters hinders the public’s ability to use online tools to associate and assemble peacefully. Finally, indiscriminate monitoring of the general population’s online communications—even when those communications are nominally public—runs afoul of due process standards enshrined in democratic constitutions and international human rights law. There is little if any public evidence that such technology is more effective than less-invasive alternatives for ensuring national security and combating serious crimes. Social media activity such as original content, likes, or shares—particularly speech that is rendered in slang or languages other than English—is susceptible to misinterpretation and misclassification. Research has estimated the accuracy rates of natural-language processing tools at 70 to 80 percent. While they are often justified as a means to reduce human error, algorithmic tools can further entrench racial or religious discrimination due to reliance on inaccurate or biased data. The resulting false positives can add innocent people to government watch lists, often without their knowledge, leaving them with little recourse for remedying the mistake. At the very least, social media surveillance must come under greater oversight. The use of such programs must be transparent, including sustained dialogue between law enforcement and affected communities. Public civil rights assessments should be conducted, and authorities should be held accountable when tools are misused and offer remedies for any victims. Online surveillance technology should not be used to proactively monitor the planning and organization of peaceful protest activities or individuals’ involvement in nonviolent political groups. And governments should swiftly amend existing privacy legislation to address the proper use of this technology. Thanks to the development of AI-assisted tools, governments now have a greater capacity for surveillance than ever before. Given their potential impact on fundamental rights, policymakers and citizens must ask themselves whether these new tools are necessary or desirable in a democratic society. It is time to move beyond outdated arguments that individuals “should have nothing to hide” or do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public areas. The survival of democracy requires vibrant public spaces, both offline and online, where individuals can collaborate, organize, and go about their personal lives without fear of constant surveillance. Government call centers and help lines government has a number of help lines and call center's through which you can get information about services and programmed report problems or make complaints provide tip-offs to authorities about fraudulent or criminal activities. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them... If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government... Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext new world order! P.S. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them... If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government... Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order !

The United States House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government is investigating alleged abuses of federal authority, including collusion between federal agencies and private sector entities to suppress conservative viewpoints. The committee has broad authority to subpoena law enforcement and national security agencies, including with regard to ongoing criminal investigations. The committee will hold a hearing on Thursday, May 18, 2023, to hear from three FBI whistleblowers and examine abuses seen at the Bureau and how the FBI has retaliated against whistleblowers. The Biden administration has shown a repeated pattern of hostility toward the U.S. Constitution and the citizenry it serves. Recently, the FBI raided the private residence of journalist James O’Keefe allegedly searching for a missing diary belonging to President Biden’s daughter. In just eleven months, the Biden administration has shown a repeated pattern of hostility toward the U.S. Constitution and the citizenry it serves. Most recently, on November 6, 2021, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) raided the private residence of journalist James O’Keefe allegedly searching for a missing diary belonging to President Biden’s daughter. O’Keefe was reportedly handcuffed, in his boxers, and detained as two of his phones were confiscated by federal agents. This federal raid on a private citizen-journalist is just the latest illustration of the Biden administration’s casual contempt for the citizens it serves. Through their efforts to coerce, intimidate, and pry into the affairs of ordinary Americans going about their lives, the administration and congressional lawmakers have served notice that they see the federal government as a blunt instrument designed to extract obedience from subjects they believe they rule. The Internal Revenue Service Wants Access to Bank Accounts In order to finance the initial version of their radical $3.5 trillion “Build Back Better” reconciliation bill, lawmakers included a provision that would have required financial institutions to report transactions of $600 or more for individual bank accounts to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This provision received intense backlash and has since been revised to cover $10,000 transactions, exempting wage income processed by a number of payroll companies. The IRS has a history of data breaches leaking sensitive tax documents for hundreds of thousands of citizens. By forcing financial institutions to spy on account holders for the IRS, this invasive provision increases citizens’ vulnerability to future financial data theft by hackers and other malevolent entities, including the Chinese Communist Party. Even beyond hacking, the IRS has a poor record as a custodian of taxpayer information. Just this year, the private financial information of some of America’s wealthiest citizens was leaked to ProPublica. And within the last decade, the IRS engaged in a targeted campaign against designated conservative organizations that delayed their tax-exempt applications and intentionally subjected right-leaning organizations to unnecessary information requests. Moreover, this plan may represent merely the first step in a broader government intrusion into ordinary Americans’ private affairs. The initial $600 threshold proposed by congressional Democrats would have provided the federal government access to nearly every working American’s bank account, facilitating audits and further intrusive monitoring and regulation of Americans’ personal finances. The current proposal represents a foot in the door for revised policies under future administrations shifting the threshold downward to cover more Americans’ bank accounts as banks become accustomed to the process. Given the ambitions of progressives to exclude disfavored transactions such as gun sales from the financial system, Americans should regard this proposal as the first step in the construction of a de facto social credit system aimed at effectively freezing the assets of citizens who possess the “wrong” views on politics. The Department of Justice Thinks Concerned Parents Are Domestic Terrorists On September 29, 2021, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to the Department of Justice (DOJ) requesting federal assistance in targeting concerned parents at local school board meetings. Disturbingly, the NSBA letter suggested that parents, many angry over the teaching of radical Critical Race Theory in the classroom, mask mandates, and prolonged school closures, were potentially guilty of participating in “domestic terrorism.” The letter, which was rescinded only after massive public blowback and the withdrawal of many of the association’s state school board affiliates, also requested that the DOJ bring in elements of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division and National Security Branch to assist in targeting parents accused of “malice, violence, and threats.” Five days later, on October 4, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo repeating the unsubstantiated claims from the NSBA and directing the FBI and U.S. Attorneys to “convene meetings with federal, state, local, Tribal, and territorial leaders in each federal judicial district within 30 days of the issuance of this memorandum” to “facilitate the discussion of strategies for addressing threats against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.” A DOJ press release on the same day announced that a task force consisting of the DOJ’s Criminal Division and National Security Division would determine how to prosecute these “crimes.” The most high-profile incident of a parent being “unruly” occurred in Loudoun County, Virginia, where a father confronted the school board for covering up the rape of his 15-year-old daughter in the women’s restroom by a male dressed as a female. Subsequent disclosures have revealed that White House staff coordinated with the NSBA to generate the letter that served as the pretext for Attorney General Garland’s directive to federal prosecutors. Despite intense questioning from several senators on the Judiciary Committee and a missed November 1, 2021 deadline to provide the Senate with the evidence that resulted in the crafting of the memo, Attorney General Garland and the DOJ have proceeded with their task force in a clear effort to intimidate parents exercising their First Amendment rights to assemble. Biden's Crime Family And Kids​ With Sex Crime Against Young Girls And 13 Dead Body's https://rumble.com/v2te3tg-bidens-crime-family-and-kids-with-sex-crime-against-young-girls-and-13-dead.html A woman's body was found inside a freezer on biden family property and now the whistleblower is dead now and body is moved and now its missing ? wow. Despite the overwhelming evidence no one will be charged in this crime at all? https://media.sailthru.com/composer/images/sailthru-prod-3ia/Biden%20Crime%20Family%20Dossier%20-%20Update%205-24-23.pdf The Department of Labor Wants to Penalize and Investigate Your Workplace The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released its “emergency temporary standard” (ETS) on November 4, 2021 that would have unlawfully and unconstitutionally mandated that every employer with more than 100 employees force its employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of employment. This action represented a violation of President Biden’s previous commitment in December 2020 that he would not support a federal vaccine mandate. But the mandate was not just a broken promise. It was also illegal. The courts have temporarily barred the Biden administration from taking any “steps to implement or enforce the mandate until further court order,” prompting OSHA to suspend its efforts to implement the ETS. The mandate had previously been slated for implementation on January 4, 2022. If the Biden administration overcomes the current stay, the OSHA vaccine mandate would impact well over 80 million American workers, constituting nearly 50 percent of the total U.S. workforce. The proposed mandate would have functioned through a penalty imposed on any employer who refuses to cooperate and violates the OSHA policy. This penalty would have included a $13,653 fine per violation against businesses and a $136,530 fine for “willful” or “repeated” noncompliance. Furthermore, the OSHA rule: Claimed to preempt any state or municipal workplace requirements Claimed unlimited authority to be changed or updated as appropriate Required employers to force unvaccinated employees to wear face coverings indoors Required employers to display CDC information on the vaccines Required employers to determine the vaccination status of every employee The ETS contained no carve-out for truckers, employers, or industries critical for the ongoing supply chain crisis (other than for federal contractors covered under another mandate). Additionally, OSHA planned to deploy inspectors to investigate workplaces reported or suspected to be in violation of the mandate. Conclusion The Biden administration is weaponizing the federal government against the American people. Its efforts to coerce financial institutions to spy on the bank accounts of American citizens on behalf of the IRS, chill the First Amendment protected expression of concerned parents at school board meetings, and force employers to require their employees to inject medicine into their bodies as a condition of employment reveal that this war against the rights of the American people is only escalating. Former President Ronald Reagan famously quipped that the nine most terrifying words in the English language are: “I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.” For tens of millions of Americans, no truer statement has ever been uttered by a politician. In the last 20 years alone, the federal government has foisted a failed No Child Left Behind policy on American students, expanded Medicare and hastened its insolvency, outlawed the Edison lightbulb, raised both food and fuel prices by mandating ethanol in our gasoline, rewarded reckless big businesses with “too big to fail” bailouts, crushed community banks through Dodd-Frank, created an unaccountable and unconstitutional consumer regulatory agency, moved millions of otherwise healthy Americans into an expanded Medicaid program, and forced massive cost-driving regulations on health insurance through the passage of Obamacare, canceling millions of previously-held policies overnight. And that’s just scratching the surface. Decades of bipartisan spending binges have the United States hurtling toward $30 trillion in national debt. In the last two decades, the U.S. national debt has more than quadrupled. It’s not just that our current trajectory is fiscally unsustainable, it’s that it is fundamentally responsible for much of the deep distrust Americans have in their elected officials. With each big government boondoggle and failure, millions of Americans are negatively impacted. In many instances, one group of Americans reap the benefits at the expense of another. The consent of the governed has been increasingly weakened over time. Fidelity to both the spirit of the Declaration and the wise limitations of the Constitution have strained to their breaking point. The result is increasingly fragmented communities, corrupt institutions, rampant cynicism toward fellow citizens and elected officials, and a civil society that no longer shares an understanding of what it means to be an American. The Center for Renewing America is committed to opposing big government for its intrusiveness, cost, and tendency to crowd out a vibrant civil society on which healthy communities depend. The threats to our communities, our families, and our faith–the pillars that allow us to live out our freedom–are vast, real, and increasingly hostile. Among these threats is a radical philosophy, rooted in Marxism, known as Critical Race Theory. This framework views all of society through a racialized prism of identity groups, with minorities being the oppressed and white people serving as the oppressor. Where Karl Marx separated society into the capitalist bourgeoisie and the oppressed proletariat, adherents of Critical Race Theory have substituted race for Marx’s class and economic distinctions. Proponents of this radical belief system have succeeded in pushing their ideology into nearly every facet of American society. Their goal is to tear down and destroy institutions that they claim serve as “white dominant” power structures that perpetuate societal ills. It is no coincidence, therefore, that nearly all of these institutions or “systems” mirror Marxism’s alleged culprits: capitalism, the nuclear family, a republican form of government, rule of law, and Christianity. The widespread manifestation of Critical Race Theory into K-12 curricula and “diversity training” around the country has become an increasing flashpoint as outraged parents, families, citizens, and communities aim to push back against this corrosive worldview. The imposition of state sanctioned racism by progressive ideologues is intended to corrupt children and future generations into both self-loathing and hatred toward their fellow countrymen. Proponents of Critical Race Theory use our university campuses to radicalize our own children, transforming them into angry “successor ideology” activists. They use their control of HR departments and boardrooms of corporate America to impose this radicalism in all private workplaces. Their organized mobs terrorize private citizens with a “cancel culture” that seeks to erase the people and ideas who refuse to adopt their totalitarian mindset. Ultimately, these radicals seek to erase the American idea that all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Center for Renewing America knows that in order to revitalize the American spirit and restore our great nation, this far-left ideology must be defeated. We are committed to that mission and stand ready with millions of citizens to stop this radical cultural revolution. Weaponization of government for political purposes "Never in my lifetime did I think I will see an American law enforcement agency be run and weaponized like the FBI last evening. This is a frightening development in our modern political arena" – Ben Carson after the raid on Mar-a-Lago Throughout my career, I was very involved in building many of the security programs now being weaponized against conservatives, so this whole situation is deeply personal. I spent over 20 years in the field of national security and am an expert in terrorism prevention programs. On August 8, 2022, a swarm of FBI agents descended on Mar-a-Lago, the personal residence of former President Donald Trump. They executed a criminal search warrant, which is something that has never happened to a U.S. president in our nation's history. The Department of Justice went to a judge under seal so the affidavit supporting the warrant was not disclosed and is still unavailable to the public. Several boxes of information were removed from the home, and Trump's attorneys were not allowed to escort the agents during the raid. This is just the latest in a string of events, signaling to the American people that the federal government's power is being weaponized for political purposes. It all began in 2016 when the FBI began surveillance of a Trump campaign advisor Carter Page based on falsified evidence provided to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). The FBI also conducted an improper investigation of the four-star general and former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Michael Flynn. He gave 40 years of his life serving in the U.S. military but was indicted on an obscure law prohibiting unauthorized diplomatic contact. Subsequently, Trump was accused of persuading Ukrainian President Zelensky to initiate investigations into the Biden family and was brought up for impeachment. Despite the public smearing and costly legal defense of all those involved, as well as the needless waste of taxpayer dollars, both the FBI and the DOJ were forced to publicly apologize for misleading the FISC in the surveillance of Carter Page, who was never charged with a crime. All charges were also dropped against General Flynn after four devastating years. Though Trump was impeached along party lines through Congress, the Senate court ultimately voted to acquit him of the charges. Once installed into power after the contentious 2020 election, the militant Left continued its witch hunt against conservatives. We saw parents suddenly labeled as domestic terrorists for passionately opposing the indoctrination and over-sexualization of their children. Next, it was the January 6 trials that landed people like Dr. Simone Gold, a renowned doctor and lawyer, in prison for entering the Capitol and taking pictures. Moreover, the whole country witnessed the despicable lack of respect for the sanctity of the Supreme Court after overturning Roe vs. Wade. Protestors were allowed to gather outside justices' homes in an attempt to intimidate them, with minimal police interference. Justice Kavanaugh thankfully survived an attempted assassination plot; however, dozens of pregnancy centers were vandalized, and several burned to the ground. Most recently, the new Inflation Reduction Act authorized 87,000 new IRS agents who must be willing to use deadly force if necessary. We cannot ignore that the target of their increased capacity will most likely be opponents of the militant Left's agenda — not only conservatives but also churches and organizations that support biblical values in all segments of our society. The intention of the homeland security apparatus created after 9/11 was to prevent foreign-led terrorism perpetuated against U.S. interests. Whether U.S. soldiers fought overseas to capture or kill known terrorists or prevention programs were put in place in the U.S., the underlying principle was stopping foreign recruitment of Americans for terrorist attacks against U.S. interests, either domestic or overseas. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court provides investigatory powers to the government against foreign threats and is without defense counsel review to protect top-secret national security information. It was never intended that these programs would be used to stop the constitutionally protected activities of Americans. It is very problematic when counter-terrorism resources are repurposed to crush American political opponents. I recall meetings with representatives from social media giants like Google and Facebook, where we pleaded with them to remove the accounts of suspected foreign terror recruiters. At the time, they were extremely hesitant about interfering in the free speech arena. They were uncomfortable about making a judgment call on who was a potential terrorist. They did not want to be seen as an arm of the U.S. government, yet over time, their attitude clearly changed. Now, these same social media giants close the accounts of anyone they ideologically disagree with. Consequently, supporters of international terrorism, like members of the Iranian government, have unfettered ability to post online, but people who support the right to life, oppose forced vaccines, or, dare I say, are Trump supporters, get regularly banned or suspended. I remember how libertarians used to warn against the overreach of law enforcement caused by the new clandestine national security network and the potential for abuse. Many of us experts didn't believe them, but now we see that danger coming to pass. The perilous consequence of this abuse of power is dividing our country. Though the enemy used to be just foreign actors intent to harm Americans, the new public enemy appears to be American conservatives and people who hold biblical values. Let's hope Congressional leaders will come together and investigate the miscarriages of justice and the erosion of our constitutionally protected right to religious freedom, free speech, and political opposition. For believers, though there are dark days ahead of us, we must always remember our trust and our hope is never in earthly things. Our faith and trust are only in our God, our Lord, and Savior, Jesus Christ. We are invincible until God calls us home. We all have an expiration date, and we won't live one minute more or less. That surety in God and His protection should be a great source of comfort, regardless of what happens in the world around us. "Fear not, for I am with you; Be not dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you, Yes, I will help you, I will uphold you with My righteous right hand'" (Isaiah 41:10). WASHINGTON, D.C. – America First Legal (AFL) has demanded that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General investigate blatant double standards of justice at the Biden Administration’s DOJ, which was made apparent with yesterday’s raid on former President Donald Trump’s home in Florida. Dozens of FBI agents raided President Trump’s home yesterday, not only shocking the conscience of our Republic, but clearly demonstrating the Biden Administration’s double-standard system of justice. Yesterday’s raid provides yet more evidence that partisans are comfortable abusing DOJ and FBI’s law enforcement resources for partisan gain. Other examples of DOJ’s abusive and tyrannical conduct over the last 19 months include, but are not limited to: No investigation into Hunter Biden’s laptop, which has been in the possession of the FBI since 2019 and purposefully kept under wraps, labeled as “disinformation,” and with no prosecutions for obviously unlawful conduct; Substantial evidence of public corruption, massive foreign kickbacks to President Biden and his family, including collusion with multiple foreign governments by the Biden family, including Joe Biden, his brother James Biden, and son Hunter Biden; Clear unlawful activity by the Obama-Biden FBI in colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign to propagate and disseminate the Russia collusion hoax, including obtaining warrants with the FISA court based on a dossier the FBI knew was false. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s issuance of the infamous October 4, 2021 memo that unleashed federal enforcement officers against parents speaking up at school board meetings to protect their rights to parent their children; Failing to enforce federal criminal statute 18 U.S.C. § 1507 against pro-abotion groups such as “Jane’s Revenge” for picketing and threatening the lives of Supreme Court justices outside their homes and summer homes, as well as for attacking and burning pregnancy centers. American citizens sitting in jail while awaiting January 6th-related trials, and otherwise indicted on charges to force plea deals, while the DOJ blatantly ignores and fails to prosecute violent Black Lives Matters, Antifa, and other protestors who engage in criminal actions such as burning a federal courthouse and decimating cities to rubble. Disparate treatment of Jeffrey Clark, Peter Narvarro, Roger Stone, and Paul Manafort, among others, with the purposeful intent to humiliate and intimidate not only these individuals but the American public generally; Actions by the Obama FBI against Carter Page and General Michael Flynn that the FBI knew were false. Hillary Clinton’s creation and maintenance of a private email account in violation of law, and subsequent deletion and acid-washing of 33,000 emails, including emails labeled as “top secret/special access program level,” yet facing no legal consequences whatsoever by the FBI; Inaction by the FBI regarding the illegal retention by the University of Delaware of records of Joe Biden when he was Senator. Statement from America First Legal Vice-President and General Counsel Gene Hamilton: “Joe Biden’s Department of Justice has made one thing abundantly clear: there are two standards of justice in America. One standard for political opponents of the administration, and one standard for its friends. Time and again, Attorney General Merrick Garland has either deliberately weaponized the Department, or failed to prevent his subordinates from doing so. The Department of Justice’s Inspector General has a choice: will he conduct a thorough review and leave no stone unturned in an effort to address blatant politicized activities at the Department, or will he let the broader Department and the Office of the Inspector General cement their reputations as left-leaning, agenda-driven entities? Time will tell,” Gene Hamilton said. The House voted Tuesday afternoon to establish a new special panel to probe what Republicans call the "weaponization of the federal government." The subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee would have extraordinary power to investigate any part of the federal government for perceived wrongdoing against conservatives -- the Justice Department and FBI, in particular. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is expected to take over the Judiciary subcommittee as Republicans say they are making final assignments. At a news conference Tuesday following a closed-door meeting of House Republicans, Majority Leader Steve Scalise outlined the establishment of the "weaponization of the federal government" panel as among the GOP's first priorities. "We're going to set up that Church committee to look at some of these federal agencies that are weaponizing government to go after families across this country based on their political views. That's not what the government should be doing," said Scalise, comparing the body to the so-called Church committee of the 1970s, in which Democratic Sen. Frank Church led an investigation of intelligence abuse by the executive branch. Scalise said the House will also vote on separate legislation Tuesday to create a new select committee on U.S. competition with China, which won bipartisan support. But overall, GOP leaders took the chance to tout differences between predecessors and the now-Republican-controlled House. "Not only did we get rid of proxy voting, we got rid of virtual hearings in committee," Scalise said. "We're going to be back in person again, and we're going to be having field hearings," he added, promising hearings on the immigration crisis to take place "at the border." With new rules changes, here's some of what House Republicans outlined for their first full week: What did McCarthy agree to with hard-liners? Faced with questions about a three-page addendum to the House Rules package passed Monday night, detailing other concessions McCarthy made to critics to win the speakership, Scalise and others downplayed the document they said McCarthy detailed at a closed-door GOP conference meeting earlier Tuesday but did not release publicly. "There's no addendum. I wouldn't call it an addendum. I think our speaker put it up on the screen today..." said GOP Whip Tom Emmer. "He made it very clear that there were no gavels given out. There were no deals like that that were made." ABC News reported last Thursday of an offer McCarthy made to GOP hard-liners opposing his bid for House speaker, including making it easier to bring a vote of no confidence to the floor, among other concessions. 'Weaponization of the federal government' subcommittee Despite concerns from Democrats, Scalise said the new select subcommittee on the weaponization of the federal government will serve "to protect every American's constitutional rights." In a straight party-line vote, the House voted 221-211 to establish the panel. The panel will have the authority to investigate how the federal government and private companies collect and analyze information on Americans, along with "ongoing criminal investigations" and civil liberties issues, according to the text of the resolution. The mandate could set up new fights with the Justice Department and national security agencies over sensitive records and probes -- including those involving former President Donald Trump. The panel would also get access to highly classified information typically only shared with the House Intelligence Committee. Democrats charge Republicans could use such broad new powers to disrupt ongoing probes into the Jan. 6 attack and Trump's handling of classified documents. "Jim Jordan and Kevin McCarthy claim to be investigating the weaponization of the federal government when, in fact, this new select committee is the weapon itself," New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. "It is specifically designed to inject extremist politics into our justice system and shield the MAGA movement from the legal consequences of their actions." But unlike how Republicans reacted to the Jan. 6 select committee, Democrats don't plan to boycott the panel and its hearings, a senior Democratic aide told ABC News. The committee would be made up of 15 members appointed by McCarthy, as speaker: Nine Republicans and six Democrats. Competition with China subcommittee The House also voted Tuesday afternoon 365-65 to create a select committee on the "Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party," which will aim to end critical economic dependencies on China. The select committee, which will hold hearings, investigate, and submit policy recommendations, will be run by Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis. The speaker will appoint up to 16 members to serve on the committee. Seven will be Democrats selected in consultation with Minority Rep. Hakeem Jeffries. In a speech on the floor earlier in the day, Speaker McCarthy said, "I want this committee to last beyond who's in the majority and never ever be decided that this is a partisan committee." "I've heard my colleagues on both sides say that the threat posed by Communist China is serious. I fully agree. This is an issue that transcends political parties. And creating the Select Committee on China is our best avenue for addressing it," McCarthy said. Notably, House Democrats did not whip members to vote against the new China select committee. Rescinding IRS funding Republicans are parading the party-line vote held Monday to rescind IRS funding under the Inflation Reduction Act as an example of the GOP keeping its promises post-midterms, despite the bill being unlikely to pass the Senate. "Our first bill will repeal funding for 87,000 new IRS agents, because the government should be here to help you, not go after you," McCarthy said upon taking the gavel early Saturday morning. Scalise claimed Tuesday the Congressional Budget Office said that the additional IRS agents "would be set up to go after hard-working families across this country" and "people making less than $200,000 a year," referring to an estimate from last August to swipe at President Joe Biden's campaign promise. Republicans also claimed through the midterms that some of the IRS agents would be armed, but both claims are misleading. The IRS has said it plans over the next decade to use the roughly $80 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act to update its systems after years of under-funding by Congress, and hire and train new agents, only a small fraction of whom -- in the Criminal Investigation division -- would be armed. Not all of those would be new agents. A new CBO score also found that the Republican bill passed Monday would add $114 billion to the deficit. Abortion bills In addition to the two votes on Tuesday to create new subcommittees, House Republicans teased more votes for later this week taking on abortion rights. "We're going to pass the Born-Alive Act," Scalise said, noting every Republican was a co-sponsor of the bill last Congress but lamenting that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wouldn't bring it to the floor. "In our first full week, we're going to actually bring that bill up for a vote." The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act legislation, proposed by Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mo., would force health care providers to care for a child who survives an abortion, which is exceedingly rare. Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Why U.S.A. Government CIA-DOJ-FBI-Etc. Killing Thousands Whistleblowers Dead https://rumble.com/v2ohr0w-why-u.s.a.-government-cia-doj-fbi-etc.-killing-thousands-whistleblowers-dea.html Why Weaponized The FBI, DOJ, CIA, & Congress Into Political Tools Are Killing Thousands Whistleblowers Dead ? The survival of democracy requires vibrant public spaces, both offline and online, where individuals can collaborate, organize, and go about their personal lives without fear of constant surveillance. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html Once you see this you'll have no faith in these people again! The system-serving airheads that should be tried and imprisoned for crimes against humanity like most politicians, oligarchs, globalists and most medias. So many innocent people of all age groups have died or been severely injured for life after listening to the advice of Hollywood celebrities, talk show hosts and politicians regarding the vaccine for covid-19. It’s right that medical ethics should be highly scrutinized, especially in cases like the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out where the process has been accelerated. However, it’s important not to mix up the atrocities of the past with current debates about medicine and policy. Decoding 100's Illuminati Symbolism Pyramid All Seeing Eye And 666 Hand Gesture https://rumble.com/v2s1tkm-decoding-100s-illuminati-symbolism-pyramid-all-seeing-eye-and-666-hand-gest.html Decoding 100's Illuminati Symbolism “Coraline” one eye with 666, everything becomes clear through the pyramid all seeing eye. Left eye path symbolizes clear vision, and the right eye in the occult symbolizes darkness. Horus and Lucifer has one eye. Hand signs of the Illuminati can be flashed in public by puppet world leaders and celebrities while the unsuspecting masses remain ignorant. Like Illuminati symbols, only Illuminati insiders are aware of the true meanings hidden behind the signs, hand gestures or semaphores. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, but lose his soul? Creepy Pedophile's Uncle Joe Played Out Over 33 Million Dollars Sexual Assault Claims https://rumble.com/v2rp4bc-creepy-pedophiles-uncle-joe-played-out-over-33-million-dollars-sexual-assau.html Creepy Pedophile's Uncle Joe Biden Has Been Accused 696 Times of Sexual Assault And Some Whistle blowers Are Dead Now. Where Is the #TimesUp Movement? The controversy over Joe Biden’s treatment of women, explained An old-school politician in a #MeToo world. A former staffer of Joe Biden has come forward, alleging that he sexually assaulted her while he was a Senator. She had initially approached the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund but they turned her away, citing fears over accusing politicians. This reveals the inherent contradictions of Time’s Up. UN Report Calls For Decriminalization Of Sex Between Adults/Children Age 8+Up https://rumble.com/v2qo62c-un-report-calls-for-decriminalization-of-sex-between-adultschildren-age-8-u.html UN New Legal Principles Launched On International Women’s and Trans Women Day to advance decriminalization efforts In March 2023, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of "new legal principles" that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally. Principle 16, titled "consensual sexual conduct," stated that sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual. Truth Behind Meat Production Chicken Waffle Beef Burger An Eye-Opening Exploration https://rumble.com/v2mmrac-truth-behind-meat-production-chicken-waffle-beef-burger-an-eye-opening-expl.html Narrated by Oscar-nominee James Cromwell, this powerful film takes viewers on an eye-opening exploration behind the closed doors of the nation's largest industrial farms, hatcheries, and slaughter plants -- revealing the often-unseen journey that animals make from Farm to Fridge. If this documentary moves you, please take a moment to consider if these animals lives are worth taking for merely taste. Thinking about going vegan? The Truth About the Meat Industry. ASSAULT RIFLE BAN AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES https://rumble.com/v2kzj20-assault-rifle-ban-and-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-funny-.html The AR-15/M-16 Is a regular rifle. Is it because it’s black and scary looking? Is it because it’s a semi-automatic? Is it because the leftist media says so. What’s the difference between these two rifles. The top is the AR-15/M-16. The one under it is the Ruger Mini-14/ Etc.# Guns. One is black, the other has a normal looking wooden stock. Guess what? They both shoot the same 5.56x45/.223 cartridge. They are both semi-automatic. both will fire as fast as you can pull the trigger. So, if you’re afraid of the AR-15 because it’s black and scary looking, it’s time you grew up and act like an adult. If it’s because the leftist media says so, then it’s time you start thinking for yourself. The AR-15/M-16 has the same sporting purpose as the Mini-14 / Other Guns. Hell, it has the same home defenses or sporting purpose as any rifle. Docs Worldwide Warn You to Not Take the Covid 19 Vaccine Will Kill You Dead Soon https://rumble.com/v2ksf52-docs-worldwide-warn-you-to-not-take-the-covid-19-vaccine-will-kill-you-dead.html 32 Doctors from 11 Countries warn against taking the COVID-19 Vaccine. The COVID vaccine has proven NOT SAFE nor EFFECTIVE, it has not been properly tested and should not be given to humans, the animals died! In addition, there is not a clear definition of any new disease for which it can be tested against. There has not been a virus that has been purified or shown to the cause of an illness. There is reason to believe the COVID-19 vaccine is dangerous and deadly. ‘We The People’ vs. ‘Us The People’ Q: Populists often stress democratic values by invoking the phrase “we the people,” but lately they’ve taken to using it not just as a subject but as an object as well. Thus: “We must never allow [insert villain] to trample on we the people!” A: “We the people” is a subject; “us the people” is an object. Here’s how they look in sentences: “We, the people, elect our leaders. Our leaders are elected by us, the people.” In both of those noun phrases, “the people” is an appositive. It identifies or explains the preceding noun or pronoun by using a different term (like the name in “My son, John”). We’ve written on the blog before about appositives, which are sometimes surrounded by commas, as in our examples above. An appositive never changes the case (that is, subject or object) of the pronoun it follows. That’s why the entire phrase “we the people” is always a subject and “us the people” is always an object. The words “we the people” resonate with Americans because they introduce the Preamble to the Constitution: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” If ever a phrase deserved proper handling, it’s “we the people.” It’s demeaned when misused as a grammatical object (as in, “Don’t trample on we the people!”). Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them... If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government... Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext new world order!

Government officials say that secret flights on a variety of factors, including (Over 20,000 missing children so far) because of air space restrictions and weather conditions, and that no attempt is made to hide their arrival (a lie). The more fundamental concern expressed by politicians who keep talking about “ghost flights the Biden administration sex traders and pedophile pickers look at the unattended and or unaccompanied girl 11 to 14 and some boys so no one will look for them, for the secret flights at night only to sell to sex slave traders in u.s.a. biden admin doesn’t want media attention on illegal immigration flights, its open border policies, or the results of those policies. How do we know? A security officer just said so, in an sex explosive video of secretive, dark-of-night flights transporting illegal immigrants to various points at night only throughout the U.S.A. This video merits coast-to-coast media coverage, not just to expose the administration’s stealth operations that flout the laws, but to encourage Americans and leaders at all levels of government to demand that the administration start protecting our border, our country, and our citizens. The list of lies administration officials have told regarding their handling of illegal immigration is extensive and still growing. How many times have they refused to call the historic numbers of illegal immigrants crossing the southern border a “crisis” or implausibly claimed the border is “closed”? Among the most pernicious problems to emerge in recent years is the sexual abuse of detainees. According to government documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union through the Freedom of Information Act, nearly 32,000 allegations of abuse from government sex traders and detainees in detention facilities. Because child trafficking is often linked with lucrative criminal activity and corruption, it is hard to estimate how many children suffer, but trafficking and exploitation is an increasing risk as more children around the world live in conflict. Tragically, many of the sex workers in the town are girls under age 18, some as young as 10. Many are trafficked into the town, while others are forced into the sex trade. These girls are extremely vulnerable, living their lives exposed to serious risks, including physical, sexual and psychological violence. The act - Recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring, or receipt of persons. The means - Threat or use of force, coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or vulnerability, or giving payments or benefits to a person in control of the victim. The purpose - For the purpose of exploitation, which includes exploiting the prostitution of others, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery or similar practices and the removal of organs. In the U.S., 60% of child sex trafficking victims have a history in the child welfare system. Foster children in particular are vulnerable to being victimized by child trafficking. Children in the foster care system often live in of the poorest communities in America, where Save the Children works to break the cycle of poverty and ensure that every child gets a healthy start, a quality education, and is protected. Consent – Individuals involved have consented to the smuggling. Trafficking victims either have not consented or have been coerced into consent. Exploitation – When the smuggled individual arrives at their destination, the smuggling ends. Trafficking is the continuous exploitation of a victim to generate profit for the traffickers. Transnationality – A person who is smuggled is always brought from one state to another. Trafficking can occur either within or between states. The child sex trade is booming in the United States, thanks in part to the ease and anonymity of online classified ad sites. And the average age of entry into child prostitution or pornography? Between 12 and 14 years old. “Girls as young as 11 have been identified in ads. Yes Thank You the Biden administration for sex traders and pedophile pickers look at the unattended and or unaccompanied girl 11 to 14 and some boys so no one will look for them, for the secret flights at night only to sell to sex slave traders in U.S.A. Biden admin doesn’t want media attention on illegal immigration flights at all.

America Is Largest Drug Cartels In The World and Fentanyl Alone or Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us is a potent synthetic opioid drug approved by and sold by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an analgesic (pain relief) and anesthetic. It is approximately 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin as an analgesic. Illicitly manufactured, fentanyl is added to heroin, disguising it as highly potent heroin, so users don’t realize that the heroin they’re purchasing may contain fentanyl. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was originally developed as an analgesic – or painkiller – for surgery. It has a specific chemical structure with multiple areas that can be modified, often illicitly, to form related compounds with marked differences in potency. Fentanyl’s chemical backbone (the structure in the center) has multiple areas (the colored circles) that can be substituted with different functional groups (the colored boxes around the edges) to change its potency. America Is Largest Drug Cartels In The World and is currently the majority supplier of drug for profit a so called illicit fentanyl to North America, with most, if not all of the cartel's heroin now also being mixed with fentanyl or related chemical like xylazine analogues to increase the heroin's “potency” in a more cost-effective manner. As of Jan. 2023, the U.S. Government Cartel is overall the most active drug cartel involved in flying in from china etc. and so called smuggling illicit drugs into the United States and trafficking them throughout the country by are own Food and Drug Administration. Departure of 100 Thousands Private Drug Contractors Was a Turning Point in Afghan Military’s Collapse and often military veterans who work for drug trade and private security firms. 90% opium-heroin in afganistan area left Afghanistan weeks ago and deployed elsewhere in the region or in the Persian Gulf. The Afghan troops could still do the basics of ground combat without American private contractors, and they’d even added some level of skill in repairing military vehicles. But it was the U.S.-supplied air power that gave Afghan troops their advantage over Taliban fighters, and without on-the-ground maintenance contractors, the military quickly collapsed. CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html - In 1990, a failed CIA anti-drug operation in Venezuela resulted in at least 18 ton of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and sold on the streets. The incident, which was first made public in 1993, was part of a plan to assist an undercover agent to gain the confidence of a Colombian drug cartel. How the CIA Turned Us onto LSD and Heroin Secrets of America's False War on Drugs. Through in-depth interviews with academic researchers, historians, journalists, former federal agents, and drug dealers, America's Fake War on Drugs tells true tales of how, for instance, the CIA and Department of Defense helped to introduce LSD to Americans in the 1950s. "The CIA literally sent over two guys to Sandoz Laboratories where LSD had first been synthesized and bought up the world's supply of LSD and brought it back," Lappé tells Nick Gillespie in a wide-ranging conversation about the longest war the U.S. government has fought. "With that supply they began a [secret mind-control] program called MK Ultra which had all sorts of other drugs involved." Conspiracy Revealed Our Own Government Sale Drugs To Kill US Overdose/Deaths - https://rumble.com/v2anz0m-conspiracy-revealed-our-own-government-sale-drugs-to-kill-us-overdosedeaths.html - The cover the history of drug prohibition, the rise of the '60s drug counterculture; heroin epidemics past and present; how drug policy has warped U.S. foreign policy in Southeast Asia, Central America, Afghanistan, and beyond; the bipartisan politics of prohibition; and much more. America's Fake War on Drugs features exclusive and rarely seen footage and documents how, time and time again, the government was often facilitating trade and use in the very drugs it was trying to false stamp out. The new world order adds short videos, and more information in an attempt to produce an "immersive experience" that will change how viewers think and feel about prohibition. A Dangerous New Zombie Drug is Taking Over American Streets and Million Will Die ? https://rumble.com/v2cjoog-a-dangerous-new-zombie-drug-is-taking-over-american-streets-and-million-wil.html There’s a new drug in town — and it has deadly consequences. Xylazine - otherwise known as “tranq,” “tranq dope” and “zombie drug” is wreaking havoc in major cities across the country with its devastating effects: It can literally rot the user’s skin. The substance, which seemed to first appear in Philadelphia before migrating west to San Francisco and Los Angeles, was used for cutting heroin, but, most recently, it has been discovered in fentanyl and other illicit drugs and remember you do not have to buy or use any street drugs at all ? Say No To Drugs ? - Xylazine is a non-opioid veterinary tranquillizer not approved for human use and has been linked to an increasing number of overdose deaths nationwide in the evolving drug addiction and overdose crisis. Our Own Government with Oliver North Worked With Cocaine Traffickers to Arm Terrorists Along with a Other U.S.A. leading role in the Iran/Contra scandal - in which North helped sell arms to Iran to fund the Contra War - North is also said to have employed air and sea transport companies moonlighting as drugs carriers. A series of expose articles in the San Jose told tales of a drug triangle during the 1980s that linked CIA officials in Central America, the U.S.A. Gov. Own Air Forces fly tons of drugs in and fly guns and arms out to Central America and Sold Tons of Drugs to a San Francisco drug ring and a Los Angeles drug dealer. According to the stories, the CIA and its operatives used crack cocaine--sold via the Los Angeles African-American community--to raise 100s millions dollars to support the agency's clandestine operations in Central America. Now its very funny again the CIA/FBI Our Government is Sell Drugs Again. The U.S. drug epidemic reached another terrible milestone Wednesday when the government announced that more than 100,000 people had died of overdoses between April 2020 and April 2021. It is the first time that drug-related deaths have reached six figures in any 12-month period. Overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) and psychostimulants such as methamphetamine also increased with are own government help with Mexico and China were the primary source for fentanyl trafficked by our own government and u.s. navy and u.s. air forces flights out of hong kong area into the u.s.a. by land and sea and balloons for years now per the National Center for Health Statistics 2022. President Biden on Wednesday released a statement mourning the more than 100,000 Americans who died last year from drug overdoses — without mentioning U.S.A. and China is helping us with leading role exporting fentanyl, which drove the 29 percent annual increase in deaths but lower then planned. Nearly two-thirds of deaths were caused by fentanyl and related synthetic opioids that can kill a person at extremely low doses. Fentanyl is increasingly added to non-opioid drugs such as cocaine and counterfeit prescriptions. In some areas of New York City, including the Bronx and the North Shore of Staten Island, more than 75 percent of overdose deaths involved fentanyl. “Today, new data reveal that our nation has reached a tragic milestone: more than 100,000 lives were lost to the overdose epidemic from April of last year to April of this year,” Biden said. “As we continue to make strides to defeat the COVID-19 pandemic, we cannot overlook this epidemic of loss, which has touched families and communities across the country”. There’s a new drug in town — and it has deadly consequences. Xylazine - otherwise known as “tranq,” “tranq dope” and “zombie drug” is wreaking havoc in major cities across the country with its devastating effects: It can literally rot the user’s skin. The substance, which seemed to first appear in Philadelphia before migrating west to San Francisco and Los Angeles, was used for cutting heroin, but, most recently, it has been discovered in fentanyl and other illicit drugs and remember you do not have to buy or use any street drugs at all ? Say No To Drugs ? - Xylazine is a non-opioid veterinary tranquillizer not approved for human use and has been linked to an increasing number of overdose deaths nationwide in the evolving drug addiction and overdose crisis. Studies show people exposed to xylazine often knowingly or unknowingly used it in combination with other drugs, particularly illicit fentanyl, which can cause skin necrosis.1 The Los Angeles Department of Public Health has issued a health alert that warns residents of the increased risk of overdose and death associated with xylazine. The Los Angeles Department of Public Health has issued a health alert that warns residents of the increased risk of overdose and death associated with xylazine, which is becoming more present among illicit drugs in California. Xylazine is a sedative and muscle relaxant used by veterinarians to anesthetize animals. Several years after xylazine first began appearing as an additive in illicit street drugs ― and as its use spreads nationwide ― the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says it will more closely monitor imports. The agency issued an import alert, which gives it the power to detain raw ingredients or bulk finished product if the shipments are suspected to be in violation of the law. Xylazine was first approved by the FDA in 1972 as a sedative and analgesic for use only in animals. The streets of the United States are in great distress. Over the years, the U.S. has had a dismal record in combating illegal drugs; some local news outlets in the country have even declared that the war on drugs has been lost. Another substance has recently wrecked the nation's roads and is literally eating people's flesh. The deadly effects of the substance Xylazine, also known as Tranq, are causing havoc in big cities all over the nation. According to reports, is a synthetic tranquilizer for animals that is widely used to cut opioids like heroin. The time will come in almost every teen’s life when they are confronted with drugs or alcohol. Some lucky ones may not experience this kind of peer pressure, but the unfortunate truth is that many teens will be asked by friends or classmates if they want to try alcohol or drugs. The drug has depressant side effects, including extreme drowsiness and respiratory distress, which are characterized by use and result in the videos of individuals who are unable to stand. Check out the video below that was shared by a twitter user last year; it contains disturbing content, so use your caution. The fact that this drug has "zombie-like" affects is what is most concerning. The main problem with the drug is that there is little possibility of recovery from an overdose. The most popular overdose reversal medication, naloxone or Narcan, is ineffective against humans, rendering Xylazine lethal. NewYork Post reports that Xylazine first emerged in Philadelphia before moving to San Francisco and Los Angeles shortly after. Right now, the scenario in the United States is worrying. According to federal reports, one person in America dies from a drug overdose every five minutes, not just from this substance but from all drugs combined. The government needs to move quickly to halt the supply. It's important to know the truth about drugs and alcohol, not just what you hear from your friends. Check out our Myths and Facts page to make sure you know the facts about drugs and alcohol. Respect yourself and your family by not causing harm to your body. Experts are warning the world needs to be prepared for people across the globe becoming addicted to ’zombie heroin’. Various forms of a flesh-eating drug dubbed ‘Krokodil’ have already been used around across much of eastern Europe since 2001. The vile substance – made by mixing gasoline, paint thinner, alcohol and codeine – is injected directly into a person's veins and has a similar effect as heroin. It was given its name because it appears to turn users into crocodiles, with their skin turning green and bumpy before it eventually rots away and falls off. Other forms of the “kitchen chemistry” drug exist too. In the Czech Republic, addicts have been known to inject Pervitin – a mix of pharmaceutical drugs, gasoline and industrial chemicals – directly into their veins. And in Greece, Boltushka, which is called the “drug of the poor”, is made of vinegar, prescription pills and potassium permanganate. The use of them has been a major growing problems in the poverty-filled, former Soviet bloc countries. In 2012, it was estimated around 100,000 people in Russia had used Krokodil alone, although that’s expected to be much higher now. But despite being used widely in eastern Europe, the UK had remained a mostly Krokodil-free zone, with just a handful of cases reported, including a Romanian woman going to hospital with gangrene skin wounds in September 2013. However, in a review published this month in the Harm Reduction Journal, health professionals across the world are warned it’s “probable” they’ll need to treat people for the horrific consequences of taking these noxious mixtures. It urges policy-makers around the world to be responsive as "homemade drug use in countries outside of Eastern Europe may be probable for reasons such as the current global economic climate and the effects of resulting austerity measures on vulnerable communities". The possibility of the toxic form of the drug making its way around the globe is even more worrying as not only Krokodil 10 times stronger than heroin, but estimated to be 64 million people worldwide using amphetamines', opiates and cocaine who could turn to newer substances to get their highs. The report says the potentially massive problem is made worse because of worldwide increased access to the Internet, which people can use to offer tips on cooking and consuming the homemade drugs. According to the review, increased usage is sucha horrifying prospect, it needs "drug user and online surveillance" to be set-up to stem the flow of drug recipes being shared. It adds: "Countries outside of Eastern Europe should be well-informed about these grave public health concerns. "A variety of opioid and stimulant syntheses are described in detail on the Internet, and the precursors and reactants are readily available. "This may lead to such harmful substances emerging in unexpected settings." According to a new report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that came out today, drug overdose deaths rose by almost 30% in the United States during 2020, making it the highest number ever recorded. More than 93,000 people died from drug overdoses in 2020, data from the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics tells us. That’s an increase of 29.4% from the 72,151 deaths projected for 2019. “Overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) and psychostimulants such as methamphetamine also increased in 2020 compared to 2019. Cocaine deaths also increased in 2020, as did deaths from natural and semi-synthetic opioids (such as prescription pain medication),” the NCHS said in a statement. This is the highest number of overdose deaths ever recorded in a 12-month period, and the largest increase since at least 1999,” Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), part of the National Institutes of Health, said in a statement. “These data are chilling. The COVID-19 pandemic created a devastating collision of health crises in America.” Similar to recent years, most of the deaths were due to inappropriate use of opioids. NCHS data shows that overdose deaths from opioids rose from 50,963 in 2019 to 69,710 in 2020. “This has been an incredibly uncertain and stressful time for many people and we are seeing an increase in drug consumption, difficulty in accessing life-saving treatments for substance use disorders, and a tragic rise in overdose deaths,” Volkow said. “As we continue to address both the COVID-19 pandemic and the opioid crisis, we must prioritize making treatment options more widely available to people with substance use disorders.” Making small talk with your pot dealer sucks. Buying cocaine can get you shot. What if you could buy and sell drugs online like books or light bulbs? Now you can: Welcome to Silk Road. About three weeks ago, the U.S. Postal Service delivered an ordinary envelope to Mark's door. Inside was a tiny plastic bag containing 10 tabs of LSD. "If you had opened it, unless you were looking for it, you wouldn't have even noticed," Mark told us in a phone interview. Mark, a software developer, had ordered the 100 micrograms of acid through a listing on the online marketplace Silk Road. He found a seller with lots of good feedback who seemed to know what they were talking about, added the acid to his digital shopping cart and hit "check out." He entered his address and paid the seller 50 Bitcoins—untraceable digital currency—worth around $150. Four days later the drugs, sent from Canada, arrived at his house. Sellers feel comfortable openly trading hardcore drugs because the real identities of those involved in Silk Road transactions are utterly obscured. If the authorities wanted to ID Silk Road's users with computer forensics, they'd have nowhere to look. TOR masks a user's tracks on the site. The site urges sellers to "creatively disguise" their shipments and vacuum seal any drugs that could be detected through smell. As for transactions, Silk Road doesn't accept credit cards, PayPal , or any other form of payment that can be traced or blocked. The only money good here is Bitcoins. Saying no to drugs and alcohol can be hard. There’s no denying that. However, with the right methods and mindset — it’s highly doable. That’s probably why everyone loves real-world examples. Learning how other people face addiction and recovery challenges can provide a valuable guiding light for you. Doing something new or difficult is so much easier if you have concrete, tried-and-true strategies you can leverage. Saying no to harmful substances is not an insurmountable task. With some seedling ideas for inspiration, repetition, and encouragement from your support network — it will get easier and come more naturally. Have courage and just stick with it! Bear in mind that finding your confidence, establishing your voice, and becoming your own advocate for your well-being are acquired skills. They don’t come naturally to most people (even if it appears that way!). The vast majority of people — including those who aren’t in recovery — spend a lifetime working to build up the skills over time. You don’t walk into a gym one day and instantly lift the biggest barbell there. You have to dedicate yourself to a routine of showing up and gradually increasing the amount of weight you can press. It’s the same thing with saying no to drugs and alcohol. You might start out having a hard time saying it. It could come out weakly and inelegantly. But, with repetition, it’ll start coming out strong. You can try out a variety of ways to articulate the message — No! — in front of a mirror, with your family and friends, in a support group. You can even record yourself and watch the playback, make adjustments, and repeat. Sometimes, you don’t know you’ve walked into a hornet’s nest until you’re in the middle of it. You need to be ready to triumph over these surprises and uncertainties. A little time and effort spent on advanced preparation might do the trick. The idea with this technique is to have your Plan B (and C and D) laid out. This could mean you have another activity you can suggest if the gang’s original itinerary is a bar hop. It could mean that you have an exit strategy in place for when being in the throes of that concert crowd becomes too much to handle. Never underestimate the value of your family, friends, support group members, and healthcare team! They love and care about you, possibly more than you realize. Most probably, they want to support you as much as they can. They want you to succeed and find a place of wellness. Take advantage of this. Lean on your people when you feel like you could use that extra bit of “external confidence boost.” This isn’t to say that you should let them act on your behalf. To the contrary, actually. You need to maintain agency over yourself, but your network may be able to facilitate you saying no to drugs and alcohol. They can show solidarity by rejecting substances as well. They can lend an ear or a shoulder when you want to talk or cry. Chances are, if you keep yourself occupied, you won’t have time to be preoccupied with drugs and alcohol. When substances are less central to your life, they might release some of their hold on you. This can make it easier to say no and may reduce your encounters with them in the first place. When confronted with drugs or alcohol, taking a beat to remember why you’re in recovery can be incredibly powerful. Hit the pause button by taking a deep breath before responding. During that moment, visualize all reasons why you’re seeking sobriety. Maybe it’s your personal physical and mental well-being, maybe it’s your child who looks up to you, maybe it’s the career or lifestyle you’re working so diligently to attain. It could be any or all of these things, or something else entirely. Staying focused can be clarifying and help you prioritize what matters most to you and why they’re worth saying no to alcohol and drugs for. Making up excuses as to why you “can’t” accept the drugs or alcohol that are being shoved in your face is completely legitimate. These are small white lies that are in your true best interest. These are not giant lies intended to deceive everyone, yourself included, for unsavory or unhealthful purposes. The key is to make it believable yet as vague as possible. Here is some we’ve heard used and that might be a good jumping-off point for you: I can’t — my parents would kill me. No thanks. I have to drive home in a little while. I can’t; I’m on antibiotics. Sorry, I’ve got an early day/exam/track meet/etc. ahead of me. No, I’m good. I’m meeting up with my family later. How Drugs Can Kill and How to Stop Them Drugs can relieve pain and cause feelings of pleasure. But they are also dangerous. At high doses, drugs can disrupt essential body functions, leading to overdose. In 2013, poisoning (largely due to drug overdose) overtook motor vehicle accidents as the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. It’s not just people with substance use disorders who are at risk. Anyone can overdose—including first-time and occasional users. But overdoses don’t have to be fatal. And they can be prevented altogether. Read on to learn what happens in the body during an overdose, key tips for prevention, and what to do if you witness an overdose. Opioids top the list of drugs that cause overdose-related deaths. Opioids bind to receptors in the area of the brain that controls breathing, blocking the signals that tell the body to inhale and exhale. If the dose is too high, breathing stops altogether, quickly leading to death. Opioids are particularly dangerous because tolerance to the drug’s effects builds at different rates in different areas of the brain. In areas that feel pain or pleasure, tolerance builds after as few as 2–3 doses. But tolerance to opioids’ effects on breathing builds more slowly. Over time, the dose needed to relieve pain or cause pleasure comes closer to a lethal dose. Tolerance is also lost quickly. Many overdoses happen when a person stops drug use for a time, then starts again with the same dose they used before. Beginning around 2010, synthetic opioids designed for use in hospitals became more broadly available in illegal markets. By 2016, they were the most common drug in overdose-related deaths in the US. These drugs are fast-acting and extremely potent. Compared to morphine, fentanyl is 50–100 times more powerful, and carfentanil is thousands of times more powerful. Too often, users take more of the drug than the mean to. Prevention Talk to your doctor. Ask questions and be upfront about personal risk factors. Follow your prescription instructions. Anyone who uses opioids regularly, or who is close to someone who does, should keep naloxone* around. Discuss an overdose plan with family, friends, and partners—including how to use naloxone. Know what you’re taking. What looks like a prescription pill or is sold as one substance may contain a powerful synthetic opioid What to do for an Overdose Try to wake the person up. Loudly call their name or rub your knuckles on their sternum. Check their eyes; pinpoint pupils are a telltale sign of opioid overdose. Give naloxone, if available. Call 9-1-1, even if you’ve given naloxone. It can wear off before the opioids do. Perform rescue breathing. *Naloxone is a medication that blocks the effects of opioid drugs. It restores breathing and saves lives. From 1996 to 2014, naloxone was used by everyday people to reverse more than 26,000 overdoses in the United States. Many overdoses involve more than one drug—and usually it’s two or more legal ones. In most of these cases no single drug is present at a lethal dose. It’s the combined effect of the drug cocktail that makes it dangerous. Alcohol and opioids are an especially deadly combination. Both act in the brainstem to slow breathing, but they act through different mechanisms. Normally, neurons in the brainstem receive a balance of excitatory and inhibitory signals, which keep us breathing at an appropriate rate. Alcohol acts by decreasing excitatory signals and increases inhibitory signals. Opioids add to the effect by making neurons less responsive to excitatory signals. In combination, alcohol and opioids strongly suppress breathing. Without oxygen, organs and tissues are damaged. Usually, the brain is affected first, and the damage may not be reversable. Prevention Avoid mixing drugs. Know your body. Trust your own experience rather than trying to match friends’ drinking habits. What to do for an Overdose Call 9-1-1. Try to keep the person conscious and sitting up. Turn an unconscious person on their side so they don’t choke on vomit. Stay with the person. They might not “sleep it off.” Unless drugs come straight from a pharmacy, it can be hard to know what you’re getting. Substances sold as one drug may contain a substitute that is cheaper or more available. And when you don’t know what drug or drugs someone has taken, an overdose becomes more complicated. Some examples of substitutions: "Bath salts" and related drugs (known as synthetic cathinones) are often sold as or added to ecstasy, cocaine, or methamphetamine. Illegally manufactured fentanyl (an opioid) is often sold as or added to heroin or cocaine, pressed into counterfeit prescription pills, and even added to marijuana. Marijuana is sometimes "enhanced" with PCP. Substances sold as MDMA (ecstasy) often contain the related drug MDA, amphetamines, methamphetamine, or other stimulants. Drugs substituted with powerful synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, are especially dangerous. Since the amount needed for a dose is so tiny, these drugs are hard to work with and measure. People putting the doses together may use too much or distribute it unevenly, making doses inaccurate or inconsistent. It’s easy to take a lethal amount without realizing it. Nicotine is a drug found in tobacco products (including cigarettes), and added to patches, gum, and liquid for e-cigarettes (taken by vaping). Most nicotine overdoses happen in children, because they are sensitive to smaller amounts of the drug. It’s very rare to overdose on cigarettes—though the wrong combination of nicotine patches, nicotine gum, and cigarettes can be dangerous. More recently, however, vaping has made nicotine overdose much more common. Nicotine binds to a family of receptors located all around the body, including in the brain, nerves, organs, and muscles. That’s why nicotine can affect many body functions. Most often, nicotine causes excitatory signals. As the level of nicotine increases, so do signs of poisoning like shaking, nausea, and vomiting. At high doses, nicotine can cause seizures and irregular heartbeat. When nicotine reaches a very high level, the effect of the drug changes. It now causes inhibitory signals. A lethal dose of nicotine can paralyze muscles. A person may have a heart attack or stop breathing. Prevention Keep nicotine gum and liquid nicotine (for e-cigarettes) up and away from children. Young children may think it’s candy. Understand the instructions and dosage of your products. What to do for an Overdose If you suspect an overdose, call the American Association of Poison Control Center 1-800-222-1222. Call 9-1-1 if the person is unconscious, can’t breathe, or has a seizure. nicotine From 2010 to 2014, the number of monthly calls to poison control involving e-cigarettes rose from one to 215. 51% involved children. Stimulants include cocaine, methamphetamine, and MDMA (ecstasy). They increase the levels of not only dopamine, but also norepinephrine. Norepinephrine increases a person’s overall activity. Their heart rate and blood pressure increase, and their blood vessels narrow. At high levels, stimulants can cause heart attack, overheating (hyperthermia), and brain damage. Even after a low dose of cocaine, a person is 24 times more likely than normal to have a heart attack. The “club drug” ecstasy is often used in hot, overcrowded conditions. This adds to the risk of overheating—the most common result of an ecstasy overdose. Prevention A healthy body equals better heart health. Try to eat, sleep, exercise, and stay hydrated. Syringe and needle exchange programs provide sterile supplies to prevent the spread of diseases like HIV and hepatitis. What to do for an Overdose Move an overheated person to a cool location. Give them water or a sports drink (do not do this if they had a seizure). Encourage the person to take deep breaths. If the person is unconscious, can’t breathe, or has a seizure, call 9-1-1. Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://rumble.com/v2dye2c-covid-19-blood-and-non-vaccines-blood-and-secret-pedophiles-blood-bank-u.s..html https://rumble.com/v2cjoog-a-dangerous-new-zombie-drug-is-taking-over-american-streets-and-million-wil.html https://rumble.com/v2auj9m-a-organ-donor-card-will-get-you-killed-very-fast-as-a-doctors-will-sell-you.html https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html https://rumble.com/v2anz0m-conspiracy-revealed-our-own-government-sale-drugs-to-kill-us-overdosedeaths.html https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html https://rumble.com/v2a7zkq-these-most-dangerous-conspiracy-theory-in-the-world-that-turned-out-to-be-t.html https://rumble.com/v2a7ugy-top-secret-government-conspiracy-revealed-government-secrets-and-cover-ups-.html https://rumble.com/v2a7kly-i-kill-you-is-it-china-russia-who-its-your-own-u.s.a.-government-who-kill-y.html https://rumble.com/v2a7c7q-ten-of-thousands-killed-by-u.s.a.-government-i-want-your-guns-killed-millio.html https://rumble.com/v2a5yvw-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true-u.s.a.-government-lies-again.html https://rumble.com/v29orjq-welcome-to-the-satellite-hoax-man-excellent-music-an-video-from-flat-earth-.html https://rumble.com/v28zp34-fast-and-furious-how-it-went-down-about-122000-firearms-sold-over-10000-peo.html https://rumble.com/v28z52a-agent-killed-in-fast-and-furious-gun-operation-and-1000-more-now-dead-2022.html https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html

Drug overdoses now kill more than 100,000 Americans a year — more than vehicle crash and gun deaths combined. Our Own Government Sale Drugs To Kill US Overdose/Deaths. Researchers think LSD flashbacks may happen during times of increased stress. Project MK-Ultra, the code name given to a Central Intelligence Agency program that began in the 1950s and lasted through the 1960s, is sometimes known as part of the CIA’s “mind control program and the Central Intelligence Agency Sold over 6 Millon+ Hit of Acid to the u.s.a. People in the 1950 thur 1973 These government acid experiments—which also sold millon's of hits or tabs of acid involved dozens of universities, pharmaceutical companies and medical facilities—took place throughout the 1950s and 1960s, before LSD was deemed too unpredictable to use in the field. When Project MK-Ultra became public knowledge in the 1970s, the scandal resulted in numerous lawsuits and a congressional investigation headed by Senator Frank Church. After volunteering to take part in Project MKUltra as a student at Stanford University, Ken Kesey, author of the 1962 novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, went on to promote the use of LSD. In the early 1960s, Kesey and the Merry Pranksters (as his group of followers were called) hosted a series of LSD-fueled parties in the San Francisco Bay area. Kesey called these parties “Acid Tests.” Acid Tests combined drug use with musical performances by bands including the Grateful Dead and psychedelic effects such as fluorescent paint and black lights. Both psychology professors at Harvard University, Timothy Leary and Richard Alpert administered LSD and psychedelic mushrooms to Harvard students during a series of experiments in the early 1960s. At the time, neither of these substances (Gov. Sales of over 6 Millon hits of acid) were illegal in the United States. (The U.S. federal government didn’t outlaw LSD until 1968.) Leary and Alpert documented the effects of the hallucinogenic drugs on the students’ consciousness. The scientific community, however, criticized the legitimacy of the studies which Leary and Alpert conducted while also tripping. Both men were eventually dismissed from Harvard but went on to become symbols of the psychedelic drug and hippie counterculture. Paraquat Pot: The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical In The 1980s When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. Our Own Government with Oliver North Worked With Cocaine Traffickers to Arm Terrorists Along with a Other U.S.A. leading role in the Iran/Contra scandal - in which North helped sell arms to Iran to fund the Contra War - North is also said to have employed air and sea transport companies moonlighting as drugs carriers. A series of expose articles in the San Jose told tales of a drug triangle during the 1980s that linked CIA officials in Central America, the U.S.A. Gov. Own Air Forces fly tons of drugs in and fly guns and arms out to Central America and Sold Tons of Drugs to a San Francisco drug ring and a Los Angeles drug dealer. According to the stories, the CIA and its operatives used crack cocaine--sold via the Los Angeles African-American community--to raise 100s millions dollars to support the agency's clandestine operations in Central America. Now its very funny again the CIA/FBI Our Government is Sell Drugs Again. The U.S. drug epidemic reached another terrible milestone Wednesday when the government announced that more than 100,000 people had died of overdoses between April 2020 and April 2021. It is the first time that drug-related deaths have reached six figures in any 12-month period. Overdose deaths from synthetic opioids (primarily fentanyl) and psychostimulants such as methamphetamine also increased with are own government help with Mexico and China were the primary source for fentanyl trafficked by our own government and u.s. navy and u.s. air forces flights out of hong kong area into the u.s.a. by land and sea and balloons for years now per the National Center for Health Statistics 2022. President Biden on Wednesday released a statement mourning the more than 100,000 Americans who died last year from drug overdoses — without mentioning U.S.A. and China is helping us with leading role exporting fentanyl, which drove the 29 percent annual increase in deaths but lower then planned. Nearly two-thirds of deaths were caused by fentanyl and related synthetic opioids that can kill a person at extremely low doses. Fentanyl is increasingly added to non-opioid drugs such as cocaine and counterfeit prescriptions. In some areas of New York City, including the Bronx and the North Shore of Staten Island, more than 75 percent of overdose deaths involved fentanyl. “Today, new data reveal that our nation has reached a tragic milestone: more than 100,000 lives were lost to the overdose epidemic from April of last year to April of this year,” Biden said. “As we continue to make strides to defeat the COVID-19 pandemic, we cannot overlook this epidemic of loss, which has touched families and communities across the country”.

These Most Dangerous Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True - 1. The CIA has a special gun that shoots dissolvable darts that leave no trace and cause people to get a heart attack. It was dismissed as a conspiracy theory before the gun actually turned out to be true during a trial where it was demonstrated by CIA operatives. 2. You know the whole “birds aren’t real” conspiracy theory? Well, it’s funny because there was a thing in the 1960s called Project Acoustic Kitty where the CIA wanted to put microphones and transmitters inside of cats and use them to spy on the Soviets. It cost about $20 million and was a huge failure and allegedly the first cat they wired was hit by a car and killed very soon after they let it go. Now I’m not saying that birds are being used to spy on us, but it’s crazy to think that the government did actually try something like that. 3. Planned Obsolescence by mobile phone companies. People suspected their phones were being slowed down on purpose when a new phone arrived. 4. Your phone is listening to you even when you aren’t using it. Case and point, my friend was telling me, in person, about some alternative to PayPal she found. This same company was then advertised to me later that day despite my never looking it up. It’s not even available in my country. 5. MK-ultra. The government was running massive mind control experiments through American universities. Further, the CIA would kidnap people, load em up with LSD and torture them under this program. They even ran illegal brothels to kidnap the johns. The victims wouldn’t talk because they’d have to admit they were cheating on their wives. The only reason we know about it is due to FOIA requests and the fact that someone forgot to destroy or hide the documents. And no one fucking talks about it. No one went to prison for it. It’s very likely that the Unabomber was pushed to his mental breaking point under the auspices of this program and lead to his targeting of universities. The FBI also ran illegal surveillance through COINTEL PRO and used it to suppress the black panthers, harass social activists, run illegal wire taps, and follow around public figures. And no one fucking talks about it. Hell it’s legal now under the patriot act. AND NO ONE FU*KING TALKS ABOUT IT. 6. That the NSA is basically storing and spying on everything sent across the internet. Then Snowden came out and told us how they were doing it and suddenly Google etc started encrypting all their inter-server communications and https was universally pushed, hard. He’s a fu*king true blue American hero who should be celebrated as such. 7. My father, who I previously thought was insane, was convinced the meds the military used to prevent malaria caused serious and permanent behavioral health issues. 30 years later, I was prescribed a different malaria med as a preventative before a trip, and I jokingly mentioned my father’s theory to the doc. “Mefloquine? Yeah, that’s actually true. That’s why we switched to this one.” 8. My grandfather for years told everyone his well water was poisoned. Everyone thought it was one of his (many) delusions. Eventually one of my uncles tested the water from his well and it turns out it was unsafe to drink. 9. Michael Jordan apparently sold so much that when he retired the NBA started losing profits. They started building stars like Kobe. They paired him up with Shaq in LA to recapture the glory days and get that Hollywood money. It’s also one of the reasons that New York never wins because win or lose, New Yorkers shell out money for the Knicks. The Spurs, being in a small market, were pushed to championships because of their international appeal. Miami was rumored to be the next Hollywood due to lax tax laws and it being a similar party city which is why the first manufactured super team was formed there. Of course there was also the Laker-Hornets trade that was vetoed by the NBA which would fuck the Hornets out of a solid trade (Lamar Odom, Kevin Martin, Luis Scola, Goran Dragic). David Stern said it was to protect the Hornets but they ended getting less for CP3 (Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon, Al Farouq Aminu and an unprotected 1st round pick). This seemed to be done to tank the Hornets, which the NBA owned at the time. 10. Not really a conspiracy but the author of Hunt for Red October got the story of submarines so accurate that the department of defense investigated him thinking he was a spy. 11. The Gulf of Tonkin incident (Vietnamese: Sự kiện Vịnh Bắc Bộ), also known as the USS Maddox incident, was an international confrontation that led to the United States engaging more directly in the Vietnam War. It involved one real and one falsely claimed confrontation between ships of North Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. The original American report blamed North Vietnam for both incidents, but the Pentagon Papers, the memoirs of Robert McNamara, and NSA publications from 2005, proved material misrepresentation by the US government to justify a war against Vietnam. 12. Colombia’s government and high rank military officials killed farmers and poor people just to get personnel promoted and support from people. The bodies had uniforms just like the ones guerrilla soldiers used to wear. People started noticing that something was wrong with these ”guerrillero bodies” when the boots in some of the bodies were backwards and a lot of people went missing from villages. 13. This is on a lighter note but in 2013 (during the twerking craze), there was a viral video which feature a girl named Caitin Heller twerking against a doorway. When someone opens the door, Heller then falls on a table with a candle thus setting her on fire. Not only was it being shared online but news media like CNN were picking up on the story. While people were having conspiracy theories that this video may be fake, those people were often mocked. Eventually, Jimmy Kimmel came out and revealed that the video was fake and Caitlin Heller was actually a stuntwoman named Daphne Avalon. 14. Watergate. It started out as a conspiracy theory, but gained enough evidence to tun into the scandal that we all know today. 15. Drug money is used to rig elections and train brutal, corporate-sponsored dictators around the world. 16. The sugar industry buying researchers to muddy the waters in regards to diet. Coke has paid for these studies to say that sugar is not harmful to the general populace but it generally is. The way that food is processed to hell and back is detrimental to humanity. I’m not innocent of enjoying sugar but the way our food is treated is a huge problem. 17. All FIFA World Cups were purchased from 1998 through 2014. When I know that in 2002, I heard about who would win each year. And it happened! 18. Systematic Pedophilia in the catholic church. It was an open secret that for whatever reason was suppressed by the church, its members and even its victims. 19. CIA putting LSD in the water supply. Except it was only a handful of extremely small (<800 pop.) towns in the American Southwest, and the outcome was not, “we have a mind control serum,” but instead, “that deeply troubled a lot of rural elderly people, who had no idea what was happening to them.” 20. Operation Northwoods. The Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans to create terrorist acts on US soil to drum up support for a war and invasion of Cuba in the 1960s. President Kennedy rejected the plan, which included: innocent Americans being shot dead on the streets; boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington D.C., Miami, and elsewhere; people being framed for bombings they did not commit; and planes being hijacked. 21. Jeffrey Epstein was killed and if you think the cameras broke both guards fell asleep and he hung himself you’re an asshole. 22. Playing football causes brain damage. They knew since the 80s but it was becoming such a juggernaut that they climate change denier’d it. 23. My grandfather was afraid of moving into a nursing home or living alone, he was convinced people working in elderly medical care were out to get him. A few years later a local nurse is in the news as a serial killer who believed she was doing the right thing ending lives early. Around the same time a home visiting nurse, who was supposed to help him, got frustrated and hit him, so I removed her from the house which was something he wouldn’t have been able to do. After reporting that nurse everywhere she was still doing home visits for an acquaintance (until I told him too). 24. Ernest Hemingway believed he was being followed by the FBI. It was passed off as paranoid delusions by the medical community and the world at large. But the freedom of information act revealed that Hemingway was an amateur agent in Cuba during the war, but also seen as a potential communist sympathizer by the FBI, who did later follow him. It played a major role in his suicide, though obviously there were many other factors. 25. Political decisions (and frankly, any big decision) are not made by YOU and only you. As it has been proven again and again and again and again, the moment you log into any social media, open a newspaper, look outside or watch tv, your view begins to be manipulated by others. Even if you think you’re above that, you’re not. We’ve all speculated this, but now we know for a fact, our decisions are manipulated and there is no way to stop that. 26. Operation Condor. The USA financed with money and weapons military groups in all South America, to prevent the communism or socialism to impose in any country on the continent. It turns out that they began to establish dictatorships that in some cases lasted for decades, disappearing tens of thousands of people against the regime. One of the most widely known case is Pinochet in Chile and Videla in Argentina. 27. The CIA kickstared the crack epidemic that devastated many US black urban areas in the ’80s in order to pay for death squads in Central America. There was an investigative series in the mid-90s written by a journalist named Gary Webb in the San Jose Mercury News where he chronicled the CIA’s trafficking of cocaine on behalf of the anti-Communist Contras in Nicaragua. This got picked up by several other larger newspapers and prompted several official government investigations. The paper got pushback which eventually led to them retracting parts of the investigative series and the official government reports whitewashed the entire thing and Gary Webb resigned in disgrace. He would later ‘kill himself’ in 2004. 28. The Business Plot: the 1930s robber barons attempted a violent overthrow of FDR’s government, with the intention of installing fascism. Smedley Butler, the man they had hoped would lead their coup, exposed them, making them look ridiculous and leading to a coverup (but nonetheless rendering the plot a failure). They destroyed his career, which never recovered, and he died in obscurity in West Chester, Pennsylvania. There’s a good chance that we would have seen a fascist/Nazi takeover of the country had one man not sacrificed his career to prevent it. Despite his heroism, few people today know his name. 29. Governments and corporations are actually spying on us. 30. I lived in Oregon in the 70’s and 80’s. Everyone always talked about how the Evergreen Airport was used by the CIA but they always denied it. The truth finally came out and the airport ended up closing afterwards. 31. Paraquat Pot: The True Story Of How The US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical In The 1980s When people talk about “killer weed,” that’s typically understood to mean really good weed. But due to US government policies that started in the 1970s and extended through most of the 1980s, marijuana fields were being sprayed with a chemical that can actually kill you. The chemical, known as “paraquat,” is an herbicide sprayed over marijuana fields in Mexico in the 1970s—with the aid of US money and US-provided helicopters—and over marijuana fields in Georgia in the 1980s under the direction of the Reagan Administration. But normally, anything poisonous enough to kill plants is also toxic enough to kill humans, and that is the case with paraquat. Paraquat is an organic acid that is used as an herbicide. It kills green plant tissue on contact. • When sprayed on plants, paraquat is tasteless and odorless and invisible. In other words, you wouldn’t be able to tell if the weed you were smoking had been sprayed with paraquat. • As far as breathable poisons go, the government has placed paraquat in Toxicity Category I—the highest possible level. • Due to the fact that it is cheap and available, liquid paraquat is frequently used in suicides throughout much of the Third World. • In humans, exposure to paraquat has been linked to the development of Parkin’s disease. • Depending on the dose and the method of ingestion, paraquat can either be immediately fatal or can lead to kidney, liver, lung, and heart failure for up to 30 days after exposure. • Tests performed in 1977 demonstrated that combusted paraquat caused damage to the lungs of laboratory rats. • In 1978, after years of attempting to reassure Americans that smoking paraquat-tainted marijuana was safe, US Secretary of Health Education and Welfare Joseph Califano announced that new tests found that heavy smokers of tainted weed could develop irreversible lung damage and that even moderate users could develop “clinically measurable damage.” 32. 1920 Poisoned Alcohol In 1926, the federal government poisoned alcohol to curb consumption during Prohibition; by the time Prohibition ended in 1933, an estimated 10,000 people had died from this poisoning. ... When the manufacture and sale of alcohol was illegal between 1920 and 1933, regulatory agencies encouraged. As if Americans hadn't accumulated enough dark suspicions about their government over the past 50-odd years, along comes an Internet factoid holding that the United States government intentionally (and fatally) poisoned more than 10,000 of its own citizens between 1926 and 1933: To sell the stolen industrial alcohol, the liquor syndicates employed chemists to "renature" the products, returning them to a drinkable state. The bootleggers paid their chemists a lot more than the government did, and they excelled at their job. Stolen and redistilled alcohol became the primary source of liquor in the country. So federal officials ordered manufacturers to make their products far more deadly. By mid-1927, the new denaturing formulas included some notable poisons—kerosene and brucine (a plant alkaloid closely related to strychnine), gasoline, benzene, cadmium, iodine, zinc, mercury salts, nicotine, ether, formaldehyde, chloroform, camphor, carbolic acid, quinine, and acetone. The Treasury Department also demanded more methyl alcohol be added—up to 10 percent of total product. It was the last that proved most deadly. It wasn't just the violent Prohibition-era gang wars that were dangerous to Americans drinking homemade moonshine and bathtub gin. According to the Dec. 26, 1922 edition of the New York Times, five people were killed in the city on Christmas Day from drinking "poisoned rum." That was only the beginning. By 1926, according to Prohibition, by Edward Behr, 750 New Yorkers perished from such poisoning and hundreds of thousands more suffered irreversible injuries including blindness and paralysis. On New Year's Day 1927, 41 people died at New York's Bellevue Hospital from alcohol-related poisonings. Oftentimes, they were drinking industrial methanol, otherwise known as wood alcohol, which was a legal but extremely dangerous poison. One government report said that of 480,000 gallons of liquor confiscated in New York in 1927, nearly all contained poisons.

Almost everyone knows that the United States government sometimes operates in the shadows, but have you ever heard of how the U.S. government poisoned alcohol during prohibition? This event costed 10,000+ dead people their lives perished from such poisoning and hundreds of thousands more suffered irreversible injuries including blindness and paralysis . When the manufacture and sale of alcohol was illegal between 1920 and 1933, regulatory agencies encouraged measures making 60 Million Gallons industrial alcohol undrinkable, including the addition of lethal chemicals. (The government did not poison supplies of alcohol meant for human consumption, nor did it intentionally aim to kill those who drank the tainted products.) This Statement Above From U.S.A. Is Not True... U.S. Government Did Purposely Poison and Done It On Purpose To Ten's of Million U.S. Americans Citizens During Prohibition 60 Million Gallons A Year Stolen Industrial Alcohol... Stolen Really ? How by a model T or A car or maybe by chain drive or worm drive truck ? To Sell 60 Million Gallons the stolen industrial alcohol, (Stolen?) the liquor syndicates employed chemists to "renature" the products, returning them to a drinkable state. The bootleggers paid their chemists a lot more than the government did, and they excelled at their job. Stolen and redistilled alcohol became the primary source of liquor in the country. So federal officials ordered manufacturers to make their products far more deadly. By mid-1927, the new denaturing formulas included some notable poisons—kerosene and brucine (a plant alkaloid closely related to strychnine), gasoline, benzene, cadmium, iodine, zinc, mercury salts, nicotine, ether, formaldehyde, chloroform, camphor, carbolic acid, quinine, and acetone. The Treasury Department also demanded more methyl alcohol be added—up to 10 percent of total product. It was the last that proved most deadly. It wasn't just the violent Prohibition-era gang wars that were dangerous to Americans drinking homemade moonshine and bathtub gin. According to the Dec. 26, 1922 edition of the New York Times, five people were killed in the city on Christmas Day from drinking "poisoned rum." That was only the beginning. By 1926, according to Prohibition, by Edward Behr, 750 New Yorkers perished from such poisoning and hundreds of thousands more suffered irreversible injuries including blindness and paralysis. On New Year's Day 1927, 41 people died at New York's Bellevue Hospital from alcohol-related poisonings. Oftentimes, they were drinking industrial methanol, otherwise known as wood alcohol, which was a legal but extremely dangerous poison. One government report said that of 480,000 gallons of liquor confiscated in New York in 1927, nearly all contained poisons. It was Christmas Eve 1926, the streets aglitter with snow and lights, when the man afraid of Santa Claus stumbled into the emergency room at New York City's Bellevue Hospital. He was flushed, gasping with fear: Santa Claus, he kept telling the nurses, was just behind him, wielding a baseball bat. Before hospital staff realized how sick he was—the alcohol-induced hallucination was just a symptom—the man died. So did another holiday partygoer. And another. As dusk fell on Christmas, the hospital staff tallied up more than 60 people made desperately ill by alcohol and eight dead from it. Within the next two days, yet another 23 people died in the city from celebrating the season. Frustrated that people continued to consume so much alcohol even after it was banned, federal officials had decided to try a different kind of enforcement. They ordered the poisoning of industrial alcohols manufactured in the United States, products regularly stolen by bootleggers and resold as drinkable spirits. The idea was to scare people into giving up illicit drinking. Instead, by the time Prohibition ended in 1933, the federal poisoning program, by some estimates, had killed at least 10,000 people. The intent of Prohibition was to deter the consumption of alcohol, which was seen as unhealthful and a public nuisance. Not only would that prove nearly impossible to achieve, but the government’s zeal to block the consumption of industrial alcohol would lead to the unintentional but disastrous poisoning, paralysis and deaths of thousands of drinkers at the hands of bootleggers. And in 1930, a pair of men in Boston would concoct an illegal and toxic alcoholic beverage, “Ginger Jake,” that was responsible for crippling up to 100,000 people across America. The Volstead Act contained two significant exceptions to its ban on the sale of alcohol – liquors dispensed by doctors as prescription medicine (typically whiskey and other hard liquor) and liquors produced and used for religious sacraments (usually wine) by priests, rabbis and ministers. Section 7 of the Volstead Act permitted alcoholic beverages as a treatment by a doctor who “in good faith believes that the use of such liquor as a medicine by such person is necessary and will afford relief to him from some known ailment.” The law also left itself open to misuse by letting doctors prescribe alcohol even if they could not physically examine the patient, as long as their off-site diagnosis was based “upon the best information attainable.” That Volstead made the exception for doctors to prescribe and pharmacists to dispense “medicinal liquor” as therapy for the sick went against even the prevailing view of the medical profession at the time. In 1917, the American Medical Association issued a declaration stating that alcohol had no “scientific value” as a tonic or stimulant for healing and “should be further discouraged.” Still, the dubious and outdated view of alcohol as a remedy — a tradition going back thousands of years — was codified in the law and would prove lucrative for both doctors and druggists and an excuse for “patients” to score booze from 1920 to the end of Prohibition in 1933. Volstead specified that doctors had to obtain a permit from the U.S. Treasury Department to prescribe alcohol, which was manufactured for pharmacies by government-approved distilleries. The department issued pads of numbered and watermarked forms to doctors who could then sign prescriptions allowing patients up to one pint of liquor (usually whiskey) every 10 days. The medicine was costly – the patient had to pay about $3 ($37.50 in 2016 dollars) to the doctor for the diagnosis and another $3 to the pharmacist. Volstead specifically prohibited refills (although not separate prescriptions) and made druggists write in a date that “canceled” the prescription immediately after filling it. Doctors typically prescribed one ounce of whiskey to adults (less for children, who also were treated with liquor) every few hours for maladies with formal names such as “la grippe” (the flu), “coryza” (the common cold) and “pharyngitis” (sore throat) but also for serious ailments such as high blood pressure, heart disease, depression, tuberculosis and cancer, with the rationale that liquor promoted digestion and physical vigor. The legal exemption led to a windfall for doctors and pharmacists. Even the AMA, just two years after Prohibition started, rescinded its objection to the medicinal value of liquor, endorsing it as a treatment for a laundry list of nearly 30 ailments. For the Walgreens drug company of Chicago, the popularity of medicinal alcohol sent profits through the roof – the chain grew from 20 drugstores in 1920 to 525 stores across the country in 1929. But Walgreens to this day insists its rapid growth was due to a combination of effective management, its tasty brand of ice cream made in Chicago served in its stores’ soda fountains, and specifically the invention of the malted milkshake by its employee, Ivar “Pop” Coulson, in 1922. For years before Prohibition, industrial-grade (and undrinkable) alcohol was used in factories as a solvent and cleaning fluid, and to manufacture detergent, flavoring extracts and perfumes. Alcohol had been subject to excise taxes as a beverage in the United States until 1906, when a process borrowed from Europe added “denaturants,” or substances that made grain-based (ethyl) alcohol taste or smell bad, to deter its use in drinks. The “denatured” alcohol could then be used, tax free, in manufacturing. By the start of Prohibition in 1920, tens of millions of gallons of denatured ethyl alcohol were made for industrial use and considered legally exempt by the U.S. government because it contained toxic additives rendering it dangerous to drink. The alcohol was denatured by mixing it with wood (methyl) alcohol, a harmful liquid that could cause blindness or death if ingested. But bootleggers started using denatured industrial alcohol disguised as whiskey – what would be called “rotgut” for its effect on the drinker’s internal organs – even in the months before Prohibition took effect. The magazine Literary Digest, in its January 10, 1920 issue, reported that scores of people had recently died, including 57 in Hartford, Connecticut, and hundreds of others blinded after drinking “alleged whiskey” containing wood alcohol. Authorities arrested some bootleggers after tracing the tainted alcohol to New York City. By about 1922, supplies of authentic whiskey distilled prior to Prohibition, and targeted for theft by bootleggers, were gone. With industrial alcohol being made on a large scale, bootleggers starting hijacking it, figuring they could redistill and sell it as drinkable alcohol. By 1923, the Treasury Department’s Prohibition Bureau was already focused on preventing organized crime from reconditioning industrial alcohol for sale to drinkers. The government instructed makers of the industrial-use liquid to denature it by adding four percent wood alcohol, poisonous to humans in very small amounts. But bootleggers nonetheless succeeded in stealing large quantities to recondition it into cheap booze for unsuspecting drinkers, often those in the lower classes who could not afford high-quality liquor. The government reported that by the mid-1920s, about 90 million gallons of alcohol for industrial use had been distilled nationally with about 6 million reserved for medical and research purposes and the rest meant for hundreds of commercial businesses. However, the government estimated that bootleggers had grabbed about 10 million gallons. Bootleggers, knowing full well it contained wood alcohol, attempted to remove the toxins by boiling the grain and wood alcohol mixture in illegal stills. The wood alcohol boiled and started to evaporate into a condenser at 151 degrees Fahrenheit, while it took 173 degrees to boil the grain liquid. Some of the poisonous wood liquid evaporated but as the public would later learn, it was not chemically possible to take out all the wood alcohol. Even a small amount of wood alcohol remaining, if ingested, attacked the nervous system, for instance, the optic nerve, causing blindness. In the mid-1920s, bootleggers sold large amounts of the poisonous alcohol mixed with other liquids, represented it as whiskey and other beverages, and people started dying. In New York in 1926, about 750 perished after imbibing the wood alcohol-laced bootlegged liquor. That New Year’s Eve, as people drank in 1927, many jammed Bellevue Hospital on New Year’s Day and 41 died. Hundreds more New Yorkers died later that year. In Philadelphia, 307 died that January, and 163 in Chicago. About 15,000 people were reported poisoned in just one county in Kansas. Up to 50,000 people may have died from the repurposed industrial alcohol nationwide and thousands of others were stricken by crippling paralysis. In 1927 in New York alone, of the 480,000 gallons of liquor seized by Treasury’s Prohibition agents, 98 percent contained poisonous additives, and liquor seized from 55 of the city’s speakeasies proved to contain traces of wood alcohol. Critics, including anti-Prohibition “wets,” blamed the deaths and injuries on reckless government policies, such as the absence of warning labels on containers of industrial alcohol. Dr. Nicolas Murray Butler of Columbia University accused the U.S. government, which approved the wood alcohol denaturant, of “legalized murder.” The government acted by passing a new law lowering the maximum wood alcohol content in industrial alcohol to two percent. In the weeks after the disaster in 1927, J.M. Doran, head chemist for the Prohibition Bureau, worked on perfecting a new, less harmful but still foul-smelling and tasting denaturant, such as kerosene. The feds later approved the addition of ingredients such as iodine, ether, nicotine and formaldehyde to try to make industrial alcohol too horrible to drink. By 1930, when the earnings of America’s bootleggers hit an estimated $3 billion, criminal distributors had for some time shifted from industrial alcohol to distilling their own raw alcohol with sugar, yeast and other ingredients, producing yields considered good enough and safe to drink. But also that year, another national wave of alcohol poisoning loomed, this time without government involvement. In 1928, a pair of Boston bootleggers, brothers-in-law Harry Gross and Max Reisman, began manufacturing a version of Jamaica Ginger, a popular patent medication used for stomach ailments, colds and malaria. Jamaica Ginger, often called “Ginger Jake,” had been manufactured since the 1860s and drank recreationally in dry counties and states even before federal Prohibition. Alcohol-based medicinal tonics such as Jamaica Ginger were obtainable legally during Prohibition, but only if manufacturers added a high percentage of bittering agents, such as ginger oleoresin, to discourage people from drinking them. Gross and Reisman sought to produce something that mimicked the chemical effects of oleoresins without effecting the taste. The men added as adulterant the chemical tri-ortho-cresyl phosphate, known as Lindol. The odorless, tasteless chemical was a plasticizer used to make celluloid film and explosives. Gross and Reisman said they were assured by the manufacturer that Lindol was safe. The men circulated about 1,000 gallons of the stuff from 1929 to 1930. It was shipped into Rhode Island and Georgia and eventually sold from coast to coast. But Lindol proved to be toxic to nerve cells, causing paralysis — mostly permanent — below the waist. It quickly produced an epidemic of damage to the legs of drinkers. From 35,000 to 100,000 people were afflicted with a pronounced, slow limp called “jake leg” or “jake walk.” Many of the injured were poor, immigrants or African-Americans. Gross and Reisman were prosecuted not under the Volstead Act but the Agriculture Department’s food and drug laws for producing a fake product. Both were convicted of felony crimes and sentenced to two years in prison. Gross went to prison but Reisman’s sentence was suspended. For decades to come, those with “jake leg” could be seen limping and begging on the streets of large cities. But they received little sympathy as many believed what happened to them was their own fault.

As a teen, I talked to my American great great grandfather as he shared good history and bad horrifying stories of 2 great wars and other small war and old massacre of his family and friends and other with story of genocide etc. Within the past years, I have stood amidst human remains in the killing fields of Cambodia, at a mass grave where hundreds of thousands are buried all over the world, at memorials in Germany and Poland to the millions killed in the Holocaust, and in the streets of new world order where the scars of ethnic cleansing remain. At each of these sites, I asked myself, “What were the conditions that led to these horrific moments in human world history ?” Mass atrocity and genocide targeting particular groups for oppression or extinction requires a set of preconditions that dehumanize people and legitimize their abuse. In every example of genocide, including the systemic massacre of Native Americans and Indigenous peoples and the enslavement of Africans by Africans, by whites and other world governments first carried out a systematic propaganda campaign. The rhetoric that preceded these atrocities spread hatred and bigotry, dividing society into an “us” threatened by the very existence of a “them.” These politics of dehumanization and division were strategies employed in the Holocaust, in the genocides in Armenia, the Balkans, Cambodia, and Rwanda, in the colonization of India and South America, during apartheid in South Africa, and, today, in Darfur, and against the Yezidis as well as other ethnic and religious minorities in Iraq and Syria. These examples illustrate the extent to which power-obsessed leaders will go to gain and hold power. Within the past two years, the new world order campaign/administration has employed these same tactics to seize power in the United States and other area, using dehumanizing rhetoric against Asians, Whites, Muslims, Immigrants, Women, Jews, Mexicans, African-Americans, Latinos/as, the LGBT community, the Pope, the press, the United Nations, intellectuals, educators, environmentalists, political opponents, comedians, and others. new world order and other associates have used the discredited rhetoric of the “Clash of Civilizations” to frighten Americans into believing their lives are threatened by those “others” who look or pray or talk differently than they do. They have manipulated the grief of white-black-brown-yellow Americans disillusioned by their failure to achieve the American dream, whipping up a frenzy of fear and hatred of targeted “others” through propaganda machines masquerading and false news sources. This was also the situation in the world, in the other county, in Cambodia, in Germany and Poland, and in Rwanda before the killing started. I imagine it was also hard for people in those countries to believe that such rhetoric would lead to the horrors that followed. At the Genocide Memorial, my Tartaria friend who had witnessed her husband and children and nearly a million fellow people murdered in the chaos of homicidal rage asked me, “How could a country as great old America can be, where people from all over the world have come to live together, select such a new world order leader? He is saying the same things world leaders said before the genocide began.” I do not know what lies in the hearts of members of the new world order administration. I am sure that there are good and honorable people there. But I do know that the rhetoric and the strategies being employed - especially by the good and bas President in the past- fulfill the criteria necessary to prepare the ground for mass atrocity and even genocide. If we fail to stop it, America may be the next exhibit in the Genocide Memorial in the new world order. It will tell the story of a despotic leader who sowed seeds of fear and hate, inciting extremist groups to violent action against fellow citizens. And how the new government promoted division, silenced voices of dissent, attacked the false press, eroded human rights, and ultimately set the stage for horrible atrocities which future historians will call the Great American Genocide from 1776 to 2023 Now. Indians as inferior. 1500- Settlers brought over diseases such as yellow fever, measles, smallpox, typhoid, and influenza to the Native American. 1513- Ponce de Leon fought with Calusa indians while on his expedition. 1524- Italians kidnapped a Native American boy to bring back to Europe. 1528- Panfilo de Narvaez claimed Florida for Spain. 1539- Hernando de Soto started exploring the south-eastern parts of North America. 1540- Francisco Vázquez de Coronado fought Zuni Pueblo Indians while exploring the south-western parts of North America. 1541- Coronado started the Tiguex War by exploring present day Kansas and New Mexico areas. 1542- Spanish Emperor Carlos V ended the legislature that allowed Indian slave labor. 1585- 108 people came and established a colony on Roanoke Island 1607- Jamestown was founded. 1614- The Mayflower arrived in Plymouth. 1622- Powhatan Confederacy was established between the Native Americans and colonists. The first uprising in an English, European colony by Native Americans. 1638- The Pequot Wars occurred between the Pequot Indians and a group of colonists. 1640- The Iroquois Wars began. 1655- The Peach Tree War began between allied tribes of Native Americans and settlements around the area. 1680- The Pueblo Indians resulted against the Spaniards. 1698- The French and Indian War began. Iroquois Indians allied with the French to fight Great Britain. 1711- The Tuscarora War began between the Tuscarora Indians and the settlers in North Carolina. 1722- Iroquois Indians gave up their land in exchange for land in the East. 1764- Pontiac, the Chief of the Ottawa tribe, led a rebellion against the British. 1776- The Cherokee Indians helped out in the Revolutionary War. 1811- Creek Wars between the Creek Indians and a group of armed men led by Andrew Jackson. 1817- The First Seminole Wars began because the Seminole Indians tried to defend runaway slaves and the land they lived on. 1830- The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress. 1832- Black Hawk War was started by Sauk and Fox Indians trying to take back their lands. 1838- Cherokee, Chocktaw, Creek, Seminole, and Chicksaw Indians were forced to walk along the Trail of Tears. 1854- Sioux Wars led by Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse. 1855- The Third Seminole War. 1862- The Homestead Act was passed by Congress, which allowed settlers to live in the Great Plains. 1887- Congress passed the Dawes General Allotment Act, which allowed them to sell Indian land to settlers. 1890- The Wounded Knee Massacre occurred. 1907- The First Native American Senator, Charles Curtis, was elected. 1969- It was declared that Indians were US citizens. At the time of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, about 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry lived on the US mainland, mostly along the Pacific Coast. About two thirds were full citizens, born and raised in the United States. Following the Pearl Harbor attack, however, a wave of anti-Japanese suspicion and fear led the Roosevelt administration to adopt a drastic policy toward these residents, alien and citizen alike. Virtually all Japanese Americans were forced to leave their homes and property and live in camps for most of the war. The government cited national security as justification for this policy although it violated many of the most essential constitutional rights of Japanese Americans. Both the Office of Naval Intelligence and the Federal Bureau of Investigation had been conducting surveillance on Japanese Americans since the 1930s. After the Pearl Harbor attack, these two agencies, plus the Army’s G-2 intelligence unit, arrested over 3,000 suspected subversives, half of whom were of Japanese descent. As far as the agencies were concerned, the remaining Japanese American population did not pose a significant threat to national security. The public, however, was not convinced. Japanese victories in Guam, Malaya, and the Philippines helped fuel anti-Japanese-American hysteria, as did a January 1942 report claiming that Japanese Americans had given vital information to the Japanese government ahead of the Pearl Harbor attack. Many Pacific Coast citizens worried that local Japanese Americans might help the Japanese military launch attacks in their region. Walter Lippmann, a journalist whose columns were carried by newspapers across the United States, argued that the only reason Japanese Americans had not yet been caught plotting an act of sabotage was that they were waiting to strike when it would be most effective. Another influential columnist, Westbrook Pegler, put it more bluntly: “The Japanese in California should be under armed guard to the last man and woman right now and to hell with habeas corpus until the danger is over.” Despite the growing public pressure to act, government officials were uneasy about incarcerating Japanese Americans, especially those who were citizens, without a clear reason. Neither Attorney General Francis Biddle nor Secretary of War Henry Stimson believed the removal would be wise or even legal. Military leaders, however, as high up as Assistant Secretary of War John J. McCloy, insisted that this policy was absolutely necessary to ensure public safety on the Pacific Coast. Between the public demand for action and pressure from the military, Biddle buckled and told Stimson he would not object to a wholesale removal of Japanese Americans from the region. Stimson advised Roosevelt accordingly, and on February 19, 1942, the President signed Executive Order 9066, which directed the War Department to create “military areas” that anyone could be excluded from for essentially any reason. The new order gave the military the authority it needed to remove individuals of Japanese descent from the Pacific Coast, but where would they go? Federal officials hoped that these individuals might be able to find work as farm laborers, but many state and local authorities made it clear they did not want Japanese Americans moving into their areas. The governors of Montana and Wyoming feared it would spark racial violence. “Our people cannot tell an American-born Japanese from an alien,” said Montana Governor Sam C. Ford. “When casualty lists start coming in…I fear for the safety of any Japanese in this state.” Idaho’s Attorney General, Bert Miller, was less sympathetic. “We want to keep this a white man’s country,” he said. “All Japanese [should] be put in concentration camps for the remainder of the war.” In the end, the newly created War Relocation Authority did move Japanese evacuees into a series of “relocation centers” for most of the rest of the war. Families were given only a few days to dispose of their property and report to temporary “assembly centers,” where they were held until the larger relocation centers were ready to receive them. Living conditions in these makeshift camps were terrible. One assembly center established at Santa Anita Park, a racetrack in southern California, housed entire families in horse stalls with dirt floors. The more permanent relocation centers were not much better. The War Relocation Authority established 10 of these camps, mostly located in the West, although two were located in Arkansas (which later consolidated to one in Rohwer, Arkansas). The Army-style barracks built to house the evacuees offered little protection from the intense heat and cold, and families were often forced to live together, offering little privacy. The residents were not required to work, but the guard towers and barbed-wire fences surrounding the camps denied them the freedom to move about as they pleased. Despite these conditions, the incarcerated Japanese Americans did what they could to make the camps feel as much like home as possible. They established newspapers, markets, schools, and even police and fire departments. At the Rohwer War Relocation Center in southeastern Arkansas, Japanese American high school students had their own band, sports teams, clubs, and activities like senior prom and student council. Flipping through the pages of the school’s yearbook, however, the makeshift barracks of wood and tar paper, the guard towers, and the barbed-wire fences visible in the photos are an obvious reminder that the experiences of these students were anything but normal. In 1943, the War Relocation Authority subjected all Japanese Americans in the camps to a loyalty test, in which they were asked to reject allegiance to the Japanese emperor and assert whether they were willing to serve in the US military. Many of the camp residents, especially those who were American citizens, were deeply offended by the government’s obvious suspicion that they might still be loyal to Japan. About 8,500 of these people, mainly second-generation Japanese American men, answered “no” to both questions, often in protest. All of these so-called “no-no” residents were labeled as disloyal, were separated from their families, and were sent to the relocation center at Tule Lake, California. Segregating the so-called “disloyal” Japanese Americans from the “loyal” ones only made the relocation program even harder to justify. If the government had taken steps to identify and remove the “disloyal” Japanese Americans, why was there a need for any of the others to remain in the camps? Washington officials like Attorney General Biddle and Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes urged President Roosevelt to end the relocation program as soon as possible, while several of the camp residents themselves challenged the program in court. Roosevelt hesitated, fearing a political backlash, but in December 1944 his administration declared the period of “military necessity” for relocation over, and officials began allowing Japanese Americans back into the Pacific Coast region. The Japanese American relocation program had significant consequences. Camp residents lost some $400 million in property during their incarceration. Congress provided $38 million in reparations in 1948 and forty years later paid an additional $20,000 to each surviving individual who had been detained in the camps. The Japanese American community itself was also transformed by this experience. Before the war, most Japanese Americans adhered closely to the customs and traditions enforced by their oldest generation (called Issei), which often deepened their isolation from mainstream American society. The experience of living in the camps largely ended this pattern for second-generation Japanese Americans (called Nisei), who after the war became some of the best-educated and most successful members of their communities. The United States at War: A list of wars (italic) and of military combat that for some reason isn’t called a war (non-italic) that does not attempt to include every war and combat against Native Americans: 1774-1883 Shawnee, Delaware 1776 Cherokee 1777-1781 Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) 1780-1794 Chickamauga 1790-1795 Miami Confederacy 1792-1793 Muskogee (Creek) 1798-1801 France 1801-1805 Tripoli 1806 Mexico 1806-1810 Spanish, French privateers 1810 Spanish West Florida 1810-1813 Shawnee Confederacy 1812 Spanish Florida 1812-1815 Canada (Great Britain) 1812-1815 Dakota Sioux 1812-1815 Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) 1813 Spanish West Florida 1813-1814 Marquesas Islands 1813-1814 Muskogee (Creek) Confederacy 1814 Spanish Florida 1814-1825 Pirates 1815 Algiers 1815 Tripoli 1816 Spanish Florida 1817 Spanish Florida 1817-1819 Seminole 1818 Oregon (Russia, Spain) 1820-1861 African Slave Trade Patrol 1822-1825 Cuba (Spain 1824 Puerto Rico (Spain) 1827 Greece 1831-1832 Falkland Islands 1832 Sauk 1832 Sumatra 1833 Argentina 1835-1836 Peru 1835-1842 Seminole 1836 Mexico 1836-1837 Muskogee (Creek) 1838-1839 Sumatra 1840 Fiji Islands 1841 Samoa 1841 Tabiteuea 1842 Mexico 1843 China 1844 Mexico 1846-1848 Mexico 1847-1850 Cayuse 1849 Turkey 1850-1886 Apache 1851 Johanna Island 1851 Turkey 1852-1853 Argentina 1853-1854 Japan 1853-1854 Nicaragua 1853-1854 Ryukyu, Ogasawara islands 1854-1856 China 1855 Fiji Islands 1855 Uruguay 1855-1856 Rogue River Indigenous Peoples 1855-1856 Yakima, Walla Walla, Cayuse 1855-1858 Seminole 1856 Panama (Colombia) 1856-1857 Cheyenne 1857 Nicaragua 1858 Coeur d’Alene Alliance 1858 Fiji Islands 1858 Uruguay 1858-1859 Turkey 1859 China 1859 Mexico 1859 Paraguay 1860 Angola 1860 Colombia 1862 Sioux 1863-1864 Japan 1864 Cheyenne 1865 Panama (Colombia) 1866 China 1866 Mexico 1866-1868 Lakota Siouw, Northern Cheyenne, Northern Arapaho 1867 Formosa (Taiwan) 1867 Nicaragua 1867-1875 Comanche 1868 Colombia 1868 Japan 1868 Uruguay 1870 Hawaii 1871 Korea 1872-1873 Modoc 1873 Colombia (Panama) 1873-1896 Mexico 1874 Hawaii 1874-1875 Comanche, Apache, Arapaho, Cheyenne, Kiowa 1876-1877 Sioux 1877 Nez Perce 1878 Bannock (Banna’kwut) 1878-1879 Cheyenne 1879-1880 Utes 1882 Egypt 1885 Panama (Colombia) 1888 Haiti 1888 Korea 1888-1889 Samoa 1889 Hawaii 1890 Argentina 1890 Lakota Sioux 1891 Bering Straight 1891 Chile 1891 Haiti 1893 Hawaii 1894 Brazil 1894 Nicaragua 1894-1895 China 1894-1896 Korea 1895 Panama (Colombia) 1896 Nicaragua 1898 Cuba (Spain) 1898 Nicaragua 1898 Philippines (Spain) 1898 Puerto Rico (Spain) 1898-1899 China 1899 Nicaragua 1899 Samoa 1899-1913 Philippines 1900 China 1901-1902 Colombia 1903 Dominican Republic 1903 Honduras 1903 Syria 1903-1904 Abyssinia (Ethiopia) 1903-1914 Panama 1904 Dominican Republic 1904 Tangier 1904-1905 Korea 1906-1909 Cuba 1907 Honduras 1909-1910 Nicaragua 1911-1912 Honduras 1911-1914 China 1912 Cuba 1912 Turkey 1912-1933 Nicaragua 1914 Dominican Republic 1914 Haiti 1914-1919 Mexico 1915-1934 Haiti 1916-1924 Dominican Republic 1917-1918 World War I (Europe) 1917-1922 Cuba 1918-1920 Russia 1918-1921 Panama 1919 Dalmatia 1919 Turkey 1919-1920 Honduras 1925 Panama 1932 El Salvador 1941-1945 World War II (Europe, North Africa, Asia/Pacific) 1946 Trieste 1947-1949 Greece 1948-1949 Berlin, Germany 1950 Formosa (Taiwan) 1950-1953 Korea 1953-1954 Formosa (Taiwan) 1955-1975 Vietnam 1956 Egypt 1958 Lebanon 1962 Cuba 1962 Thailand 1962-1975 Laos 1964 Congo (Zaire) 1965 Dominican Republic 1965-1973 Cambodia 1967 Congo (Zaire) 1976 Korea 1978 Congo (Zaire) 1980 Iran 1981 El Salvador 1981 Libya 1981-1989 Nicaragua 1982-1983 Egypt 1982-1983 Lebanon 1983 Chad 1983 Grenada 1986 Bolivia 1986 Libya 1987-1988 Iran 1988 Panama 1989 Bolivia 1989 Colombia 1989 Libya 1989 Peru 1989 Philippines 1989-1990 Panama 1990 Saudi Arabia 1991 Congo (Zaire) 1991-1992 Kuwait 1991-1993 Iraq 1992-1994 Somalia 1993-1994 Macedonia 1993-1996 Haiti 1993-2005 Bosnia 1995 Serbia 1996 Liberia 1996 Rwanda 1997-2003 Iraq 1998 Afghanistan 1998 Sudan 1999-2000 Kosovo 1999-2000 Montenegro 1999-2000 Serbia 2000 Yemen 2000-2002 East Timor 2000-2016 Colombia 2001 – Afghanistan 2001- Pakistan 2001- Somalia 2002-2015 Philippines 2002- Yemen 2003-2011 Iraq 2004 Haiti c2004- Kenya 2011 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2011-2017 Uganda 2011- Libya c2012- Central African Republic c2012- Mali c2013-2016 South Sudan c2013- Burkina Faso c2013- Chad c2013- Mauritania c2013- Niger c2013- Nigeria 2014 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2014- Iraq 2014- Syria 2015 Democratic Republic of the Congo c2015- Cameroon 2016 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2017- Saudi Arabia c2017 Tunisia 2019- Philippines

You are worth more money to me if you are dead for your body parts to sell on the black market and organ harvesting is a rampant trade in human organs, involving collusion between organized criminals and corrupt doctors, police, jails, government and medical administration staff. We dive into the body trade and see the ways it operates and the risks involved for the desperate people at both ends of the deal, in what is an unregulated and often perilous market. How much does an organ transplant cost in the US ? Get ready to see some large numbers for the average charges of an organ transplant in 2020 dollars. The most common transplant – cornea – averages $32,500 in estimated billed charges. Kidney transplant estimated at $442,500 for the entire process, including surgeon fees and drugs. Costs are calculated from 30 days pre-transplant, to 6 months post-transplant discharge. Summary table of cost breakdown is shown. The detailed report shows autologous bone marrow transplant at $471,600, bone marrow-allogenic at $1,071,700 (up 20% since 2017), liver transplant at $878,400, and heart transplant at $1,664,800. Multiple organ transplants easily top an estimated $1 million, or $2.6M for heart-lung or kidney-heart.) By Transplant Living, a project of the nonprofit United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), organization that maintains the national Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) under contract with HRSA. Report by Milliman was published January 2020. What’s if my doctor or other doctor is to deny a patient proper care if they knew she or he signed up as an organ, tissue and cornea donor? Yes i will deny care so i may sell your body parts very fast. I'm looking for the unattended and or unaccompanied younger person the most to age 36. So no one will look for you or looking for them. I will tell the authority that you bleed to death or your bodily experience a total bleeding out before care. Yes It’s a deeply rooted concern that anyone personally or professionally connected to donation hears on a regular basis—from a broad range of ages and cultures. Some skeptics cite this as the reason they choose not to join the more than 3.5 million people in the donate life registry. Ha ha ha suckers With countless myths, fears and personal reasons, people unnecessarily rule themselves out all the time. But no other factor hints so directly at a disturbing version of donation—the trading of one life for another, which is not anyone’s MO. Picture it: It’s the Hollywoodized interpretation of an emotionally conflicted medical professional letting a patient’s life slip away to make sure a [insert family member here] receives the heart transplant they so desperately need. We get it—it’s suspenseful and compelling. That’s the point. Movies and television shows get more viewers with some drama and a tug at your heartstrings—accuracy tossed out. In this context, entertainment supports an urban legend, and the fear it perpetuates actively prevents the lifesaving gift of life. Organ donation means giving part of the body (organ) to a person with end stage organ disease who needs a transplant. The organs that can be donated by you or taken by force if need and maybe rape you too. (laugh out loud) for transplantation include kidney, liver, heart, lungs, and small bowel and tissues such as corneas, heart valves, skin and bone. Tissue means a group of cells performing a particular function in the human body such as bone, skin, cornea of the eye, heart valve, blood vessels, nerves and tendon etc. Living Donor Organ Donation: A person during his life can donate one kidney, a portion of pancreas and a part of the liver. Deceased Donor Organ Donation: A person can donate multiple organs and tissues after (brain-stem/cardiac) death. Organ Transplantation and Donation is permitted by law, and covered under the “Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994”, which has allowed organ donation by live & Brain-stem Dead donors. In 2011, amendment of the Act also brought in donation of human tissues, thereby calling the Amended Act “Transplantation of Human Organs & Tissues Act 2011”. The Government of India has also started a National Organ and Transplant Program (NOTP), under which patients below the poverty line are supported for the cost of transplant as well as cost of immunosuppression after transplant for one year. A black market, underground economy, or shadow economy is a clandestine market or series of transactions that has some aspect of illegality or is characterized by noncompliance with an institutional set of rules. If the rule defines the set of goods and services whose production and distribution is prohibited by law, non-compliance with the rule constitutes a black market trade since the transaction itself is illegal. Parties engaging in the production or distribution of prohibited goods and services are members of the illegal economy. Thanks ! Organ Donor See You Soon ? Yes Not Everyone Is Bad ? Ha ha ha - Really ? Money Talks You Know ! P.S. Hope This True Video & Text Will Save Someone Life and So Be Safe !

Pedophiles Things You Ought To Know About All Secretary Of Homeland Security Secret Dept. Of Pedophile's Club Head Alejandro Mayorkas And Millions Of Other Child Pedophile Sex Crimes Today As Planned By U.S.A. In The First Place. So in a letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Senator Rick Scott and 100s of other again demanded that Secretary Mayorkas resign following him repeatedly lying to both the American people and to Congress while under oath. For months, Secretary Mayorkas has falsely claimed that the southern border is “closed,” despite in the last 20 years After 9/11 there being nearly 26.8 million illegal immigrant apprehensions and got a ways all so under his failed leadership—the highest number ever on record. Reports Suggest That Pedophile's Alejandro Mayorkas and Others in the federal government has been unable to track 85,000 ages 11 to 16 years old migrant children sex slaves mostly girls who have been sold by U.S.A. Government as Sex Slaves and released into the United States since 2021. Some of these children may have been forced into sex labor in the U.S., and concerns have been raised about the welfare of these children. A first-term House Republican is leading 75 other lawmakers in demanding transparency from the Biden administration. A New York Times report found that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) could not reach more than 85,000 children after being placed with sponsors and lost "immediate contact" with one-third of the children. Senator Hawley has demanded that the FBI launch a full-scale effort to locate missing migrant children. Dear Secretary Homeland Security Secret Dept. Of Pedophile's Alejandro Mayorkas: On September 21, 2021, during your testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on “Threats to the Homeland: Evaluating the Landscape 20 Years After 9/11,” you lied under oath that America’s southern border is “closed”. In that same hearing you also said, “DHS continues enforcing our immigration laws and responsibly managing our border…” and “The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to stemming the flow of irregular migration and comprehensively addressing the long-standing challenges that drive this migration.” Furthermore, when asked about details or data related to border security and immigration enforcement you evaded answering questions. These false statements and evasive answers are unacceptable. The American people deserve honesty, full transparency and to know what is happening at the border. Month after month, data released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) prove your assertions of a secure border are completely false. Nearly 1.7 million crossings have occurred throughout the 2021 fiscal year—the highest number of crossings in history. I believe it is time to admit your inability to properly execute the duties required of your position and immediately resign your post as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). President Biden inherited the most secure southern border the United States has seen in decades. During your confirmation hearing in January, I asked if you would follow and enforce all immigration laws to ensure the security of the border was not compromised. Although you committed to do so at the time, this has clearly not been the case. During your brief tenure to date as DHS Secretary, you have dismantled and obstructed the enforcement of our immigration laws. As a result, our southern border is being overrun. Rather than working to arrest and deter illegal border crossings, your policies have promoted illegal immigration by eliminating the consequences for unlawfully crossing our nation’s southern border. These include the Migrant Protection Protocols program (MPP) and Asylum Cooperation Agreements (ACAs) with Northern Triangle countries. You reinstated the dangerous policy of “catch and release,” have halted all border wall construction and directed the department to not fully enforce Title 42 during a pandemic, which is an important authority to help contain the spread of COVID-19. All of these policies worked and had proven to help keep American families and communities safe by controlling the flow of illegal immigration, human trafficking and drug smuggling across our southern border. “The truth is that human trafficking and sex slaves is the number one business for Pedophile's Alejandro Mayorkas and the U.S. politics and policies of open borders is great and have not failed the American People Great Demand for Sex Slave. Our broken system is working great as planned to get more sex slaves and endures, and the ongoing humanitarian and security crisis at our Southwest Border leaves many minors and families at extreme risk of being exploited by traffickers, human smugglers, gangs, and other nefarious actors seeking to profit at their expense as planned,” said Secretary of Homeland Security Secret Dept. Of Pedophile's Alejandro Mayorkas. “Activist courts, congressional inaction, and criminals intent on breaking our laws stand in the way of confronting illegal and uncontrolled migration threatening our safety and security. What was a crisis, is now a full-fledged emergency.” Pedophile's Alejandro Mayorkas Said: How to get a top government job is easy to get if you really want one... So like me... All you have to do to get a high paying job is to have Sex and Rape a very young Child on film or video and later kill the baby, kids, or children's (boy or girl is my choose) and adding Pedophile's Alejandro Mayorkas now i can be black mail and go to jail if i do not do or work as told... So Now I'am Part Of Homeland Security Secret Pedophile's Club Now. Your refusal to continue these polices not only defies logic, it has resulted in true harm to the American people as planned in the first place. Over the last nine months, an unprecedented as planned and hope for larger amount of illegal drugs, including massive amounts of extremely deadly fentanyl as planned, have poured into the U.S., 26,000,000 illegal aliens have been released into the interior, and there have been an estimated 4,000,000 more illegal border crossings that evaded arrest and detention. Through your purposeful disregard for border security as planned and lack of immigration enforcement to get more sex slaves, you have not failed to faithfully execute your oath of office as planned. You have facilitated and strengthened the savage cartels who are working with the U.S.A. as planned that smuggle and traffic vulnerable migrants and threaten the lives of women and children sex workers as planned. Regardless of politics or ideology, above all, you work for the American people first. Now, the American people can no longer afford to wait for you to do your job. Your total lack of transparency and inability to follow basic protocols to secure the border and keep families safe is astonishing and it’s time for new leadership at DHS. Sincerely, He could be your neighbor, your babysitter, your youth minister, your grocery check-out guy, your best friend’s husband. He could be anyone you know. Not exactly a big, flashing sign that says "alleged pedophile" around this guy’s neck, is there? The fact that a Bush Administration Department of Homeland Security Official was arrested yesterday for attempting to solicit sex from a 14-year-old girl over the internet is a shock for some people. But it shouldn’t be. The fact that this arrest also happened on the day that Justin Berry was testifying about his abuse at the hands of internet sexual predators before Congress makes this all the more horrid, in my mind — the juxtaposition between Brian Doyle and Justin Berry is just painful when you read the news articles side by side. Taylor has a fantastic article about this — it’s a tough read, but a necessary one to understand the mindset behind this sort of behavior. Warning: I’m going into a bit of detail below, and I didn’t want it to come as a shock for anyone. Know what you face — and face it head on. I’ve prosecuted a number of pedophiles in my time, as well as participating in ongoing probation supervision for already-convicted sexual predators, and there is one thing about which I am absolutely certain: you can never cure a pedophile. You can work with them, you can do aggressive therapy to help them control urges, you can do any number of things which require them to limit contact with children and porn and what-have-you, but there is no cure. Most pedophiles that I’ve had to deal with in my legal career were molested themselves as children. A lot of them grew up in families where they were routinely molested by a parent or step-parent so that they grow up thinking this sort of behavior is normal. Not every person who is sexually molested becomes a pedophile — and I wish I knew where that switch gets flipped for some people and not others. But ultimately it is all about power and/or the thrill of the hunt, depending on the pedophile. Controlling your victim becomes everything. And almost every pedophile that I’ve ever had the misfortune of supervising or prosecuting had a long, long history of being a sexual predator. Most pedophiles don’t just molest one child (as if that weren’t bad enough). I attended a prosecutor’s seminar on sexual predators when I was working, and was told that the average pedophile has hundreds (yes, hundreds) of victims over a lifetime. Brian Doyle was sloppy — which means on some level he wanted to get caught. He allegedly informed the undercover cop posing as a 14 year old that he worked for the DHS. He gave her his cell phone number — a phone issued by the Department of Homeland Security. He was chatting, online, with the undercover officer from his home in Maryland when officers arrived at his home to arrest him. Here’s what’s in store for Mr. Doyle: his computer will have been seized by those police officers. They will comb through the hard drive of that computer for every, single chat in which he ever participated with a child. If there are more, they will track down every one of those children that they can to determine whether or not they have had sexual relations with him. They will comb through the hard drive for any child pornography that may exist thereon — and he faces federal criminal charges if there is any (and there likely is, considering that’s a fairly usual find in this type of case). There is a criminal count for each, individual picture. There are definitely Florida state charges — since this was a Florida state investigation/sting that caught Mr. Doyle. I know you are sitting there at your computer thinking "ewwww," and you are right to do so, but you have to face the fact that this sort of thing goes on — every day, all over this country — before you understand the need to be vigilent in protecting your own children from these sorts of predators. These are seasoned cops, though, who knew to catch him online while they did the arrest — so they had a contemporaneous record and could verify immediately that his prints were on the keyboard from the chatting, giving him no loophole argument for getting around the charges. If there is child pornography on his computer, the authorities will try to trace back every single photograph to its origins to determine who took them, who was involved in the production, the distribution, the planning — every single aspect of this will be investigated as fully as it can be, to the extent that you can trace this sort of thing back. And let me tell you, be grateful if you have never had to view child pornography in either photo or video form. I still have nightmares sometimes about cases that I worked as a prosecutor, worrying about the children that we could never identify. It is tough, gritty, gut-wrenching work. And thank god for the police officers and FBI agents who do it. But you can’t just depend on police officers to take care of all of this. One of the biggest cases our local police were ever able to crack open came as a result of a tip from a food delivery service fellow who thought it was weird that an old guy, who lived all by himself, bought multiple boxes of popsicles all the time — and always had a slew of kids in his impoverished neighborhood hanging out at his house. Guess who was using all those popsicles to lure and groom local neighborhood kids…for years. We do things backwards in this nation — and how we deal with pedophiles is one of them. A sexual predator has the potential to crush the lives of hundreds of victims over a lifetime. A child’s life is changed in the instant that he or she is molested — and the lives of every person around them for the rest of their lives are changed as well. Studies have consistently shown that one in every four children in this country will be sexually molested — one in four — either by a stranger or, more commonly, by a family member or family friend. The next time your kids have friends over to your house, just think about that one in four number for a minute and realize its implications. We have to be smarter and do better with this sort of crime — because it ripples outward on so many, horrible levels over the lifetime of the survivor. If your child begins to act furtive, secretive, hide their online activity from you, spend an inordinate amount of time IM-ing and trying to hide it, no longer spending time with other kids, disappearing from the house at odd hours, shying away from your hugs or any touch, gets very jumpy — anything along those unusual lines, you should try to keep a close eye on why the changes occur. (Sure, teenagers especially, can be a bit jumpy behaviorally, but there you are.) Check your caller ID — if there are repeat calls from a particular number — out of state or locally — that you don’t recognize, ask about it. One of the biggest questions in my mind on this was how this was happening repeatedly with a Department of Homeland Security official who was using his work cell phone to perpetrate this? The WaPo had this as well: Another Homeland Security official — Frank Figueroa, special agent in charge of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Tampa — faces trial this week on charges of exposing himself to a teenage girl last year at a mall. Figueroa, who has been suspended, pleaded not guilty. What in the hell is going on at the Department of Homeland Security? These are the people who are supposed to be protecting us, right — instead, it looks like we have to protect our children from them. Background check, anyone? Secret Pedophile's Watch Child Beauty Pageant Glitter Girls Age 4 Thru 8 Yrs. Old https://rumble.com/v36e1uw-secret-pedophiles-watch-child-beauty-pageant-glitter-girls-age-4-thru-8-yrs.html A child beauty pageant is a beauty contest featuring contestants starting at age 4 to under 16 years of age. Competition categories may include talent, interview, sportswear, casual wear, swimwear, western wear, theme wear, outfit of choice, decade wear, and evening wear. Depending on the type of pageant system (glitz or natural), contestants may be found wearing anything from makeup to fake teeth, known as flippers, as well as elaborate hairstyles and custom-designed fitted outfits to present their routines on stage. Sexualization in child beauty pageants has been the topic of controversy and debate. Since all contestants for child beauty pageants are minors, there are concerns regarding the potential long-term negative impacts early sexualization can have on these children's psyche. The negative impacts can affect the contestant's self-esteem and relationship with their own bodies throughout their lives due to hyper-fixation on achieving professional adult aesthetics at a young age. In more extreme cases, the psychological impacts of early sexualization in pageants can lead to various psychological disorders such as depression, anxiety disorder, and various eating disorders. However, there is also support of children competing in beauty pageants due to the way they challenge children to have more confidence in order to be able to compete successfully in these pageants. Bikini contests of minors Miss Tanguita, which translates as "Miss Little Thong", is held in Barbosa, Santander, Colombia as an annual part of the "del Rio Suarez" Festival. Activists say that the competition, though legal, abuses the human rights of minors. A leading transgender health association has lowered its recommended minimum age for starting gender transition treatment, including sex hormones and surgeries. The World Association for Transgender Health said hormones could be started at age 8, two years earlier than the group’s previous advice, and some surgeries done at age 12 or 15, a year or so earlier than previous guidance. The group acknowledged potential risks but said it is unethical and harmful to withhold early treatment. The association provided The Associated Press with an advance copy of its update ahead of publication in a medical journal, expected later this year. The international group promotes evidence-based standards of care and includes more than 7,600 doctors, social scientists and others involved in transgender health issues. In A Secrets Meeting Per U.S.A. New Sharia Law Rules 2022 and Kids Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Rules 2023 Kids Can Now Start At Age 8 Yrs. Old Puberty Blockers Drugs Per President Joe Biden's Administration has confirmed that the legal age of consent for sex and marriage will be lowered to 8 yrs old starting February 16th. 2023 During a speech Tuesday afternoon, Biden stated ‘We have to do it... The age, the kids, they should be about this old.’ He then held up a gesture suggesting the historic decrease. New World Order Plan To Control Secret Evidence Revealed Death UN 21 Agenda U.S.A. Per Biden Saying 42 U.S. Code Chapter 21B - RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION Satan Worship and Child Sacrifice Law and Secret Pedophile's Rules - Freedom of religion is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits laws establishing a national religion or impeding the free exercise of religion for its citizens. While the First Amendment enforces the “separation of church and state” it doesn’t exclude religion from public life. From the colonial era to present, religion has played a major role in politics in the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court over the years has ruled inconsistently on matters of religious freedom, such as the display of religious symbols in government buildings. Child sacrifice is the ritualistic killing of children in order to please or appease a deity, supernatural beings, or sacred social order, tribal, group or national loyalties in order to achieve a desired result. Ritual Child Sacrifice Is Alive and Well in 21st Century America In this nation, children's body parts are sacrificed for witchcraft and food too. Puberty is the process (a series), of physical changes where a child's body matures into an adult and becomes sexually able to reproduce. Puberty is started by hormonal signals from the brain to the gonads. For females the ovaries and for males the testes. Adolescence refers to a period of time where there is a physiological and physical development which takes place in between childhood and adulthood. Puberty is relevant in an adolescents life as it is the time where adolescents begin to explore for an identity and become an adult. Puberty is the beginning of profound changes in adolescents drive, motivation, physiology and their social life. All of these changes will continue to develop throughout the adolescents life. Social and emotional changes contribute to major differences in a child and adult. Physical and emotional changes of female puberty do not always happen together. Sometimes female's mature emotionally before any physical changes happen. Social and emotional changes are signs that show that you are forming an independent identity, are maturing and beginning to learn how to be an adult. Some social changes you may experience puberty when you are around 9 to 11 years old so age of consent for sex and marriages need to be 8 yrs. old under sharia law and rules and per freedom of religion is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (age very's) are: Searching for an identity; Children and adolescents are busy figuring out where they fit in the world. This search is often influenced by gender, peer group, cultural background as well as family expectations. Seeking independence; This is very likely to influence your decisions you make and the relationships that you have with family and friends. Seeking responsibility; This can take place at home and at school Looking for new experiences; The nature of teenage brain development means that teens are likely to try and seek new experiences and engage in more risk-taking behavior. But teenagers are still developing control over their impulses. Thinking about 'right' and 'wrong' more often; You will start to develop stronger individual sets of values and morals. You will also learn that there are responsibilities for your own actions, decisions and consequences. You will question more things such as words and actions. Words and actions can help you develop a sense of right or wrong. This is influenced by friends, behavior, sense of self and self-esteem start to develop. You may also begin to explore a sexual identity; you may begin to have a romantic relationship or go on dates. These are not always necessarily intimate relationships though. For some children and adolescents intimate or sexual relationships don't occur until later on in your lifetime and communicate in different ways. For example the internet, mobile phones and social media can also influence how you communicate with your friends and learn about the world. Some emotional changes you may experience when you are around 9 to 11 years old so age of consent for sex and marriages need to be 8 yrs. old under sharia law and rules and per freedom of religion is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (age very's) are: Showing strong feelings and intense emotions at different times.; Your moods may seem unpredictable. These emotional ups and downs are easily lead to conflict. Your brain is still learning about how to control and express different emotions in a mature way. Sensitive; You may become sensitive to your emotions. Children and adolescents get better at reading and processing other people feelings and emotions as they mature. While you are developing these types of skills, you can sometimes misunderstand body language or facial expressions. Self-conscious; You can become more self-conscious. Especially about physical appearance and changes. Teenage self-esteem is often affected by appearance or about how young people think they look. As you develop you may compare your bodies to your friends, peers as well as celebrities. 'Bulletproof' stage of thinking; You may go through a 'Bulletproof' stage of thinking or acting where you act as if nothing bad could happen to you and your decision making skills are still developing at this stage. You are still learning the consequences of your actions. True Pedophile's Blood Killings Story Behind Joe-Hunter Biden’s Laptop and Nearly 13K photos from Hunter Biden's laptop hit the web 'Truth and Transparency' Nudity and private information — like Social Security and credit card numbers — redacted from photos. A trove of photos from Hunter Biden's laptop has been made available to the public through a new website that launched Thursday. The website's will now house almost 10,000 photos spanning from 2008 to 2019 and took months to complete, Garrett Ziegler, the founder of nonprofit Marco Polo, told Fox News Digital. P.S. Photo of man hanging by his ball is one of the Biden son's missing 3,000 Photo's Are Still Missing Now From CIA-FBI-DOJ The Death and Rape and Child Killing Photos Are Also Missing Now! "It's taken us a couple of months to, one, go through the photos, about 10,000 of them, and redact the genitalia on the photos," Ziegler, a former Trump White House aide, said of the contents found on the laptop once owned by President Biden's son. "The number one thing we're about… is truth and transparency," he said. "If the American people want to know what their first family is like, they're going to get it. And we're not going to be taking out photos that paint the Bidens in a good light." Ziegler also noted that several photos containing private information were redacted — including images containing Social Security numbers, banking information and credit card numbers. Additionally, multiple nude photos of Hallie Biden, the widow of Beau Biden, were redacted. Of the many photos found on the laptop, Ziegler provided Fox News Digital with two never-before-seen photos from the laptop. One photo showed Hunter Biden cozied up to his then-lover Zoe Kestan in 2018. The other image — featuring an array of drugs and a condom wrapper sitting on a table — was from a text message conversation Hunter had with Hallie Biden — the widow of Beau Biden and former lover of Hunter Biden — the same year. Providing further insight on the type of content viewers can expect on the website, Ziegler said some content that does not carry "news value" will not be featured. "There are, for example, screenshots of Candy Crush games where we are fairly confident in saying there's absolutely no news value to those," he said. "So it's going to be, I would say, 98% of the photos on the device, around 10,000 in total, although it'll be slightly less than that." "It's going to be a completely authentic recounting of the photos on the device," Ziegler added. Ziegler promised that there won't be any genitalia visible on the site and insisted that the photo project — which will display the images chronologically — covers a "large swath" of the first family's life and includes an array of photos. He also made clear that it is not a "hit job" against the Biden family. "There's a picture of a letter that Hunter's daughter, Finnegan, wrote to, I assume, troops stationed overseas, like in Iraq and Afghanistan," he said. "It's an adorable letter. Finnegan's around 9 years old at the time, and it definitely paints the Bidens in a good light." "We're not Republican activists. None of us are registered Republicans," he continued. "In fact, I loved and still love Trump precisely because he wasn't a standard Republican. So this is not a hit job. We're going to keep all the photos that paint the Bidens in a good light and keep all the photos that paint the Bidens in a bad light. The American people can judge for themselves what they think about their first family through this." Describing the effort as "the most thorough exposé of any American first family while they're in office in the history of America," Ziegler said the types of photos that will be shared to the website are photos that typically "only become available once the presidential archives are open and those photos only detail his time in the Oval while he was the president." Ziegler also said the website will use a "photo viewing app that will allow users to view the metadata in the photos." "They're going to be able to see where the photo was taken, what time it was taken, if it has latitude and longitude coordinates attached to it," he said. "They're going to be able to see if it has metadata like aperture, lighting." Following the launch of the website, Marco Polo shared a tweet early Thursday morning that noted the website's servers were "under heavy stress." "Our servers are under heavy stress and we are working to get it fully functional and secured," the group wrote. "Incredible engagement already in the first couple hours." Ziegler also noted that videos from the laptop will be available for public viewing at a later date. Describing why it will take longer for the videos from the laptop to be uploaded to the site, Ziegler said his team has to use AI tools to assist with censoring portions of the videos because "there's so much pornography." Ziegler said there are "several" questionable photos in particular that he believes reporters should take a look at. The White House and Hunter Biden's attorney did not respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment. The FBI going to such great lengths to give positive cover for the Bidens makes me wonder why . If the whistleblowers statements are even close to being true the country is in real trouble . The FBI hide evidence of crimes and charge innocent people of crimes all to sway an election to a preferred candidate . Where is the honor , integrity and respect for the job . We should never convict another person when the FBI charges them with lying to them . The goal of this post is to raise awareness of rich pedophile's and on the sick perversions and corruption running deep in the Bill and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and Biden Family's with help from Disney, Branson, Epstein, Gates, and global elite and the political/showbiz world. This post isn't meant to promote porn/child porn. sexual photos of minors were found on the laptop of Joe Biden's killing kids having sex in china and son Hunter Biden and Bill and Hillary Clinton killing children in chinese's sex den's party and other place's all over the worlds. Disney Pedophile's Billionaire-Backed Sex Trafficking Cult Partied With Richard Branson on His Private Island and It’s also worth noting that former President Obama vacationed with Branson on Necker Island last year. Moreover, convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein had Branson and Bill Clinton listed among his contacts in his “little black book,” and his private island known as “Orgy Island” is less than 40 miles away from Necker Island within the Virgin Islands cluster. Disney Pedophile's Branson Necker Island 40 Miles To Epstein Orgy Island Global Elite - https://rumble.com/v2dim5k-disney-pedophiles-branson-necker-island-40-miles-to-epstein-orgy-island-glo.html - CIA Director Pompeo Oversees Capture Of UN Pedophile Who Leaked Video Of Hillary Clinton Killing Child (True ?) What is the real world evidence and sources for these words that I've seen shared so much? Podesta’s email account was hijacked and the hackers took his entire private library of emails. This sucked hard for Podesta because the hackers had tons of high ranking-sensitive information. From October through November 20,000+ pages of emails were uploaded to wiki-leaks. Pedophile and A Pizza Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Evidence ** GRAPHIC ** - https://rumble.com/v2bbfv2-pedophile-and-a-pizza-secret-human-trafficking-and-child-sex-ring-evidence-.html - Adrenochrome | C9H9NO3 | CID 5898 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety Does adrenochrome exist at all ? Yes. The employee that spoke to bloomberg said when epstein would visit the property, he would walk around. Business insider, from bill clinton to naomi campbell: Every celebrity named in jeffrey epstein files. The viral post claims gates traveled to epstein's private caribbean island, little st. Name found in epstein's black book and on epstein's private jet log. In a bombshell ruling, a federal judge has ordered dozens of documents that could expose the identities of Jeffrey Epstein’s associates related to visits to his Little St. John island in the Caribbean. In a ruling that came late last Friday, Judge Loretta Preska of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled the public interest in the documents outweighs the right to privacy. Epstein sex scandal, Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case, $105 million, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein Guests, victims sue Jeffrey Epstein's estate, abuse claims, Jeffrey Epstein Connection, Jeffrey Epstein victim, claims, sex tapes, the pedophiles, wealthy associates, Prince Andrew Epstein, US politics, Epstein's death, Jeffrey Epstein, Celebrity Guest List, Virgin Islands sex trafficking, $105 million Settlement, Jeffrey Epstein settlement reached, Epstein List, Epstein flight logs, Little St James Island, guest List, Jeffrey Epstein estate reaches settlement, Jeffrey Epstein's Estate, US Virgin Islands, Epstein estate, Rumble, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, Google, Duck Duck go, Truth Social, Epstein Island Vistor List, epstein island guests, jeffrey, epstein, lolita express, Epstein passenger list, pedophile island, sexual predators, perverts, Donald J. Trump, Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Donald J. Trump, Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Chelsea Handler, Ben Affleck, Phil Collins, The Queen, Betty White, Violinist Itzhak Perlman, John Legend, Cher, Lady Gaga, Madonna, John Cusack, Jim Carrey, Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey, Steven Tyler, Richard Branson, Naomi Campbell, Charlie Sheen, Prince Philip, Ellen DeGeneres, Pharell Williams, Christy Teagan, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Jay Z, Beyonce Knowles, Eminem, Marshall Mathers, Alex Baldwin, Meryl Streep, Will Ferrell, Seth Green, Will Smith, Jada Pinkett Smith, Hollywood Celebrities, U.S. Sen. John Glenn, Former Senate majority leader George Mitchell, Quinton Terentino, Robert Downey Jr, Nadia Bjorlin, Catherine Hudson, Gwen Stefani, James DeFranco, Anderson Cooper, Demi Moore, Stephen Colbert, Wanda Sykes, Michelle Wolfe, Bill Murray, James Gunn, Kathy Griffin, Katy Perry, Brian Afleck, and 1,000's more Pedophile's. UN Report Calls For Decriminalization Of Sex Between Adults/Children Age 8+Up https://rumble.com/v2qo62c-un-report-calls-for-decriminalization-of-sex-between-adultschildren-age-8-u.html UN New Legal Principles Launched On International Women’s and Trans Women Day to advance decriminalization efforts In March 2023, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of "new legal principles" that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally. Principle 16, titled "consensual sexual conduct," stated that sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual. https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/8-MARCH-Principles-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf U.S. Government Is Selling Child Pornography and False Charges Against U.S. Citizens https://rumble.com/v2gonq2-u.s.-government-is-selling-child-pornography-and-false-charges-against-u.s..html I Was Raped By Politicians, Your Fathers Your Mother Other Family Members and U.S. Government Is Selling My Photos XXX Child Pornography (also called CP, child sexual abuse material, CSAM, child porn, or kiddie porn) is pornography that is unlawfully to some and not-unlawfully to other global elite who exploits children for sexual stimulation. It may be produced with the direct involvement or sexual assault of a child (also known as child sexual abuse images) or it may be simulated child pornography. Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts. Secrets Meeting Biden Said New U.S.A. Laws Coming Age of Consent Is To Be 8 Yrs. Old https://rumble.com/v2j9os4-secrets-meeting-biden-said-new-u.s.a.-laws-coming-age-of-consent-is-to-be-8.html In A Secrets Meeting Per U.S.A. New Sharia Law Rules 2022 and Kids Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy Rules 2023 Kids Can Now Start At Age 8 Yrs. Old Puberty Blockers Drugs Per President Joe Biden's Administration has confirmed that the legal age of consent for sex and marriage will be lowered to 8 yrs old starting February 16th. 2023 During a speech Tuesday afternoon, Biden stated ‘We have to do it... The age, the kids, they should be about this old.’ He then held up a gesture suggesting the historic decrease. Puberty typically starts between the ages of 8 and 13 for girls and AFABs and New Age of Consent, specifically one young person's question about whether or not to wait until she reaches to have sex, is complicated. There are many nuances to the law depending on where you live and the law itself can be harmful when it's intent is to help. Social media users are sharing screenshots of articles claiming Joe Biden has lowered the age of sexual consent to 8 years by laws. Over the last week, social media users have been pushing claims that President Joe Biden had lowered the age of sexual consent to 8 years. Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html Once you see this you'll have no faith in these people again! The system-serving airheads that should be tried and imprisoned for crimes against humanity like most politicians, oligarchs, globalists and most medias. So many innocent people of all age groups have died or been severely injured for life after listening to the advice of Hollywood celebrities, talk show hosts and politicians regarding the vaccine for covid-19. It’s right that medical ethics should be highly scrutinized, especially in cases like the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out where the process has been accelerated. However, it’s important not to mix up the atrocities of the past with current debates about medicine and policy. Left Wing Vs. Right Wing Yes Two Wings of the Same Bird All Politicians Are Corruption https://rumble.com/v2k15za-left-wing-vs.-right-wing-yes-two-wings-of-the-same-bird-all-politicians-are.html The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Most Bizarre Sexual Deviations In The World Of Pedophile's Politicians And Celebrities https://rumble.com/v2qly46-most-bizarre-sexual-deviations-in-the-world-of-pedophiles-politicians-and-c.html Sexual Disorder is a type of Personality Disorder that may be further divided into Sexual Dysfunction and Sexual Deviations. In Sexual Dysfunction there is a reduction or total loss of sexual capacity, which includes frigidity in females, and premature ejaculation and impotence in males. Sexual Deviation involves sexual interest directed primarily towards objects other than people of the opposite sex, towards objects not usually associated with sexual intercourse, or towards sexual intercourse performed under bizarre circumstances. This video lists and describes the 10 most bizarre Sexual Deviations in the world. TIMESTAMPS:- 0:00 Ten Bizarre Sexual Deviations - 0:29 Beastiality - 1:11 Exhibitionism - 1:46 Fetishism - 2:11 Homosexuality - 2:51 Incest - 3:42 Masochism and Sadism - 4:19 Pedophilia - 4:46 Transvestism - 5:28 Voyeurism Sexual perversion is an old-fashioned diagnostic term that served as a label for sexual activities considered outside the norm of heterosexual sexual desire and activity. This norm was defined as coitus with a person of the opposite sex with the aim of achieving orgasm through genital penetration. Any other type of sexual activity, regardless of the sex of the participants, was traditionally considered perverse. Human Meat Project - New Shake 'N Bake Fetus - Campbell Cream of Fetus Soup? https://rumble.com/v2qkf5y-human-meat-project-new-shake-n-bake-fetus-campbell-cream-of-fetus-soup.html Welcome to the Human Meat Project, we are the human meat donation program. By donating bodies for human consumption, we are taking action to solve overpopulation, which leads to climate change and the greenhouse effect caused by the mass farming of livestock animals in order to feed the world. How About A New Shake 'N Bake Kitty Flavors - Like Aborted Fetus ? or Campbell Cream of Fetus Soup If you have a craving for Aborted Fetus Soup, then we’ve got some bad news for you. An Oklahoma Senator, Ralph Shortey, has now outlawed “the manufacture or sale of food or products which use aborted human fetuses.” Pedophile's Eating Alive And Aborted Baby And Young Kids Too Rejuvenating Potion https://rumble.com/v2q0z7u-pedophiles-eating-alive-and-aborted-baby-and-young-kids-too-rejuvenating-po.html Planned Parenthood Kills Them and Then Sells Their Organs. Which is Worse? Planned Parenthood Is Largest Food Suppliers Human Meat In The World Today. "You Are What You Eat." Most of us have likely heard this saying before and are familiar with its simple and sensible meaning. When we were younger, this adage taught us (hopefully) to take care of what we put into our bodies because the food we eat can have a direct affect on our health as a whole. Selling Human Meat Per Planned Parenthood Rules All Sell At Cost/Lost For Non-Profit Organization. Federal law prohibits the commercial sell of human meat and trafficking of fetal tissue for profit and carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $500,000 fine. (Key Word Is (( 4 Profit )) Per Federal Law and Pedophile's Eating Alive And Aborted Baby and Kids... Is O.K. If Only Sell Human Meat Is At Cost or At A Lost. P.S. Planned Parenthood Only Sell Human Meat At Cost/Lost... After Paying All Employee Hourly Wages and Other Cost To Run A Not-For-Profit Organization. Lab-Grown And Real Human Meat Was FDA Approved Cannibalism A Sprit Cooking https://rumble.com/v2mnkmi-lab-grown-and-real-human-meat-was-fda-approved-cannibalism-a-sprit-cooking.html There is something deeply disquieting about cannibalism. Motives and technicalities do not matter; eating human flesh is now universally considered revolting, whatever the circumstances. However, if we trust a long line of anthropologists and ethnographers, this has not always been the case in all parts of the world and is therefore not self-evident. Stripped of all cultural context and psychological connotations and in purely detached terms, the act of cannibalising a corpse might be considered a victimless crime, the victim of the act being a lifeless body destined to decay anyway. And yet, cannibalism is instinctively perceived in virtually all cultures today as grisly violence and, more than that, a violation of all that makes us human. It is probably this perception that led some scholars to question whether human beings could ever have engaged in such practices, except in the most wretched conditions. Truth Behind Meat Production Chicken Waffle Beef Burger An Eye-Opening Exploration https://rumble.com/v2mmrac-truth-behind-meat-production-chicken-waffle-beef-burger-an-eye-opening-expl.html Narrated by Oscar-nominee James Cromwell, this powerful film takes viewers on an eye-opening exploration behind the closed doors of the nation's largest industrial farms, hatcheries, and slaughter plants -- revealing the often-unseen journey that animals make from Farm to Fridge. If this documentary moves you, please take a moment to consider if these animals lives are worth taking for merely taste. Thinking about going vegan? The Truth About the Meat Industry. What is left out of our food labels? Behind the cow industry are disturbing secrets you are not supposed to know. Supermarket beef has become an industrialized, unnatural product laced with lies beyond the labels. What actually happens to that meat before it reaches grocery store shelves? In this blog I’ll unveil the dirty truth behind the cattle slaughter process everyone needs to hear. 600 Billion Dollars Poison Ingredient Making Your Food Toxic To Eat Processed Food https://rumble.com/v2mesq8-600-billion-dollars-poison-ingredient-making-your-food-toxic-to-eat-process.html Nina deserves a lot more accreditation on this video, she was one of the first people to shed light on the problems with seed oils and the history of how they came to be. Top Ten Toxic Food Ingredients in Processed Food - Any food that has been canned, dehydrated, or had chemicals added to it is a processed food, and these foods make up about 60 percent of the average American diet. - Most of us don't think of the food we eat as poison, but some of the ingredients commonly found in processed foods can be considered toxic. By "toxic," I mean chemicals or highly processed ingredients that aren't good for you or can cause harm to your health. I'm talking about refined grains, trans fats, high fructose corn syrup, and all the other artificial junk you can't even pronounce on the ingredient lists. ASSAULT RIFLE BAN AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - FUNNY https://rumble.com/v2kzj20-assault-rifle-ban-and-the-supreme-court-of-the-united-states-funny-.html The AR-15/M-16 Is a regular rifle. Is it because it’s black and scary looking? Is it because it’s a semi-automatic? Is it because the leftist media says so. What’s the difference between these two rifles. The top is the AR-15/M-16. The one under it is the Ruger Mini-14/ Etc.# Guns. One is black, the other has a normal looking wooden stock. Guess what? They both shoot the same 5.56x45/.223 cartridge. They are both semi-automatic. both will fire as fast as you can pull the trigger. So, if you’re afraid of the AR-15 because it’s black and scary looking, it’s time you grew up and act like an adult. If it’s because the leftist media says so, then it’s time you start thinking for yourself. The AR-15/M-16 has the same sporting purpose as the Mini-14 / Other Guns. Hell, it has the same home defenses or sporting purpose as any rifle. Why Is A Tyrannical U.S.A. Government Helping Mass Shootings Deadliest Gun Killings Now. The Real Number Now Are Over 1 Million Guns Sold Without Any Back Ground Check Now as Dec. 31 2022 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives- Sold To The Drugs Cartels - any criminal organization with the intention of supplying sex worker and drug trafficking and guns etc. operations and also Remember The Taliban takes control of Afghanistan - there is a big concern emerging. $85 billion worth of military guns and equipment left by the Americans is now under Taliban's control. As of Dec 31 2022 Sold Over 5 Million Weapons To 1000s sex/drug cartels all over the world Now... bang bang you're dead ! In the United States, a red flag law is a gun violence prevention law that permits a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who they believe may present a danger to others or themselves. A judge makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. It’s impossible to separate the traffic in humans, the traffic in drugs and guns, and the ambitions. They are all part of the same picture. any criminal organization with the intention of supplying drug trafficking operations. Good Luck With This One ? Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead and kids too. so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. https://rumble.com/v28zp34-fast-and-furious-how-it-went-down-about-122000-firearms-sold-over-10000-peo.html With few exceptions for human trafficking and pedophile and gangs and sex and drug cartels and any and all criminal organization. All State law requires people to meet certain criteria before they can carry, possess, or dispose of a firearm. These qualifying factors include the following: Be a citizen of the United States. Be at least 21 years old, except for honorably discharged individuals from either the New York National Guard or the United States Military. Be of good moral character. Never had a guardian appointed based on incapacity, mental illness, subnormal intelligence, or other condition or disease. Never had a handgun license revoked. Never civilly confined in a secure treatment facility. Never convinced in all state or anywhere else of a felony or “serious offense.” The definition of “serious offense” includes acts like aiding in an escape from prison, child endangerment, disorderly conduct, illegally using a dangerous weapon, making burglar instruments, rape, receiving stolen property, sodomy, and unlawfully entering a building. Never discharged from the military under dishonorable conditions. Never involuntarily committed to a facility under the Department of Mental Hygiene’s jurisdiction. Not be a fugitive from justice. Not be an addicted or unlawful user of any controlled substance. Not have a domestic violence restraining order filed against you. Not illegally in the United States or admitted into the United States under a non-immigrant visa. Not present any other “good cause” for denial of the license. These are some of the most common reasons why people in New York are denied gun permits. Also, you will likely be required to complete a gun safety class before obtaining a firearm permit. P.S. Remember... The Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. and It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government Now! The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2008. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. For some reason, we don’t think “Gun Control” is the ‘real’ issue. It’s a great distraction and it causes division among the citizens. We think the Government is secure in their knowledge of their ‘new’ crowd control devices, that we know about, and their “Frequency and Earthquake Weapons” they think we don’t know about. We will be exploring their ‘new’ capabilities soon in greater detail. Yes We The People Of The New World Order Thank You!

The truth is stranger than fiction. For this list, we’ll be going over the strangest and most famous conspiracy theories that were actually conspiracy facts. Our countdown includes Roswell Cover-Up, The FBI Spied on Political Activists, Watergate Scandal, and more! Is there a theory you once believed that you now realize was a load of baloney? Tell us in the comments! Perhaps one of the most shocking conspiracy theories that turned out to be true was a CIA program called MKUltra, which had the stated goal of developing biological and chemical weapons capability during the Cold War. In 1963 the government I pay taxes to killed my president. In 2001, they terrorized my land and passed the Patriot Act to spy on me. In 2020 they released a virus on me then tried to force me to take a deadly vaxx. They print money constantly to steal my dollar. It's not democracy, it's dictatorship? The term “conspiracy theory” refers to a theory or explanation that features a conspiracy among a group of agents as a central ingredient. Popular examples are the theory that the first moon landing was a hoax staged by NASA, or the theory that the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center were not (exclusively) conducted by al-Qaeda, but that the US government conspired to let these attacks succeed. Conspiracy theories have long been an element of popular culture; and cultural theorists, sociologists and psychologists have had things to say about conspiracy theories and the people who believe in them. This article focuses on the philosophy of conspiracy theories, that is, on what philosophers have had to say about conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories meet philosophy when it comes to questions concerning epistemology, science, society and ethics. After giving a brief history of philosophical thinking about conspiracy theories in section 1, this article considers in more detail the definition of the term “conspiracy theory” in section 2. As it turns out, the definition of the term has received a lot of attention in philosophy, mainly because the common usage of the term has negative connotations (as in, “It’s just a conspiracy theory!”), raising the question whether our definition should reflect these. As there is a great variety of conspiracy theories on offer, section 3 considers ways of classifying conspiracy theories into distinct types. Such a classification may be useful when it comes to identifying possible problems with a conspiracy theory. The main part of this article, section 4, is devoted to the question when one should believe in a conspiracy theory. In general, the philosophical literature has been more positive about conspiracy theories than other fields, being careful not to dismiss such theories too easily. Hence, it becomes important to come up with criteria that one may use to evaluate a given conspiracy theory. Section 4 provides such a list of criteria, distilled from the philosophical literature. Turning from questions about belief to questions about society, ethics and politics, section 5 addresses the societal effects of conspiracy theories that philosophers have identified, also asking to what extent these are positive or negative. Given these effects, the last question this article addresses, in section 6, is what, if anything, we should do about conspiracy theories. Answering this question does not, of course, depend on philosophical thinking alone. For this reason, section 7 briefly mentions some relevant work outside of philosophy.

Global Slavery Indexestimates that 45.8 million people are currentlyenslaved in some form. Modern slavery consists of human trafficking for physical labor or sex. The victims include women, young girls and boys, and LGBTQ youth, who are often coerced into prostitution. We may think modern slavery only takes place in faraway lands, but it’s happening right here, right now. According to the U.S. Department of Justice and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, Long Island and New York City are in the top 20 locations for sex trafficking in the U.S. Most recently, three Long Islanders were charged with human trafficking and child prostitution. Long Island’s access to transportation (airports, rail roads, boats) and its dense population make it easier to target and move people unnoticed. What most see as a disgusting and illegal act is a lucrative business for others. Sex trafficking generates approximately $9.5 billion annually in the U.S. alone. The most common form of human trafficking (79%) is sexual exploitation. The victims of sexual exploitation are predominantly women and girls. Surprisingly, in 30% of the countries which provided information on the gender of traffickers, women make up the largest proportion of traffickers. In some parts of the world, women trafficking women is the norm. The second most common form of human trafficking is forced labour (18%), although this may be a misrepresentation because forced labour is less frequently detected and reported than trafficking for sexual exploitation. Worldwide, almost 20% of all trafficking victims are children. However, in some parts of Africa and the Mekong region, children are the majority (up to 100% in parts of West Africa). Although trafficking seems to imply people moving across continents, most exploitation takes place close to home. Data show intra-regional and domestic trafficking are the major forms of trafficking in persons. Trafficking is a problem that affects virtually every country of the world. Generally, the flow of trafficking is from less developed countries to industrialize or towards neighboring countries with marginally higher standards of living. The main reason thereof is poverty, illiteracy, cultural practice of the society, which turns women and children into patented and saleable commodities. Among the third world countries are geographically and economically backward. Low yielding agricultural lands, lack of literacy, no alternate source of employment resulting economic hardships and no improvement in living standard mark the rural scenarios of this region. These circumstances provide an ideal environment for the genesis of prostitution, perversion and crime. Besides poverty, survival compulsion and shady dealings made by shaming parsimonious aunts, uncles, neighbors and other family members opt a person to choose prostitution as the profession. This leads to a life of glamour and luxury. Thus, poverty alone is not the cause of prostitution any more . The institutionalization of prostitution as integral part of the tourism industry today is indeed a matter of concern for all nations. Professional call girls operate at various levels depending upon the paying potentials of the customers. In the context of Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, such sex workers mostly come from very poor families. The extent of their penury is such that they have nothing other than their body to sell to earn two meals for the family. All countries believe that trafficking of people, especially women and children for prostitution and forced labor is one of the fastest growing national and international criminal activities. Human trafficking is growing daily plugging the globe. In one hand the sickening sex industry is flourishing because of its clandestine and lucrative nature and on the other hand it has to be dealt with wider and stern laws with its effective enforcement. Meanwhile the government so concerned has to combat with these problems, protect the rights of victims and rehabilitate them into the community. For the fulfillment of the said purpose there requires wide vision, close understanding, cooperation, and honest commitment of nations. Sex trafficking laws assume that all underage sex workers are exploited young girls who have been forced into such work by a vicious pimp. But does this actually reflect the experience of most young, domestic sex workers? Using ethnographic research from Atlantic City and New York City, New World Order find that underage sex workers have much more agency in their relationships with pimps than many assume, and that sex trafficking discourses may serve to further alienate them from organizations to assist them. The authors call for academics and policy makers alike to set aside their ideological positions about sex work and to seek a deeper understanding of young people in commercial sex markets. Many recent public policy discussions about prostitution, especially underage prostitution, invoke disturbing narratives of hyper-violent, predatory pimps luring and coercing young girls into sex slavery. However, three recent studies of underage sex workers and pimps/market facilitators in New York and New Jersey call into question these assumptions. First, these public narratives overestimate the role of pimps in street sex markets; second, they overemphasize the impact of the initial recruitment stage on subsequent practices; and third, they mask or simplify the difficult and complex choices and contingencies faced by minors who sell sex. The studies find that there is in fact no prototypical pimp and relationships are more flexible, dynamic, and particular to the individuals involved than has been previously imagined. These questions are not merely academic, since they have driven more than a decade of major changes in public policy concerning sex work. In 2000, the U.S. Congress passed the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), which served as a model for similar legislation internationally. Many of these sex trafficking laws reclassified all individuals under the age of 18 who trade sex for money as victims of trafficking and anyone “aiding, abetting, or benefitting” from such prostitution as sex traffickers (with the ensuing enhanced penalties and prosecution). In fact, the most recent statistics suggest that over 2/3 of the accused traffickers in the United States are African American men, raising serious concerns about possible racial bias in the positioning and implementation of the law. Instead of the traditional view of local pimps as simply criminal operators, they became part of a dangerous new global class of traffickers. These radical legal shifts were largely motivated by anecdotal evidence of harrowing stories of coercion and victimization that were unrepresentative of the experiences of the young sex workers who were studied. To empirically test these narratives, in three separate studies data was collected from active pimps, underage prostitutes, and young adult sex workers in New York and New Jersey. The first New York study involved a statistically valid sample of the largest dataset ever gathered in the field in the United States on minors working in the sex trade. The second was an intensive community study that holistically explored street prostitution markets in Atlantic City, New Jersey, between 2010 and 2012, including pimps, street hustlers, sex workers, customers, local businessmen, and various third parties. The third study involved a sample of eighty five male pimps in New York City, some of whom worked exclusively with minors. In all three studies we found that recruitment into sex work by pimps is far less common than is presupposed in TVPA discussions and other popular depictions. Pimps played a small role in both initiation and more generally in the operations of street prostitution markets in both New York and Atlantic City. This was particularly the case for minors, who generally earned less than sex workers over 18, and were therefore less interesting to pimps. Roughly half of our respondents in New York and the vast majority in Atlantic City did not know a full-time pimp at the time of their interview. Only about 10 percent of sex workers 16 to 24 years of age in Atlantic City were minors, of whom only two had a professional pimp. Those who self-identified as having a pimp typically described relationships that were more mutual and easier to leave than the stereotypes suggest. There are, of course, violent and otherwise abusive pimps: approximately 5 percent of the pimps in the pimp study described such an approach to pimping. Among the 14 percent of female sex workers in the New York Sex study who had pimps, we estimate that approximately 10–15 percent faced such systematic abuse. In Atlantic City we were able to identify three such relationships between a young sex worker and a pimp. These findings suggest that roughly 2 percent of all the sex workers whom we interviewed, across both cities, were in a relationship with a predominantly abusive, violent pimp. Overall, though, we found a clear pattern of increasing, rather than decreasing, levels of young sex workers’ autonomy over time. As the sex workers in our survey became more experienced, more mature, and more accustomed to the dangers of customers and law enforcement, their pimp’s authority typically receded and a more equal relationship developed, or the sex worker simply left the pimp. Similarly, most of the pimps whom we met were realistic about the limits of their authority and did not want to lose the source of their livelihood. At all levels, pimps were constantly faced with the danger of being abandoned for another pimp, an escort agency, or independent work. We recognize that situations of oppression and captivity do exist among this population, and we have identified a few in our findings. However, they were rare enough in a statistically representative sample in New York City and an intensive ethnographic census in Atlantic City to question the degree to which the dominant narratives of underage sex trafficking and resultant policies can protect the majority of vulnerable youth engaged in commercial sex markets. In one study, only 2 percent reported that they would ever go to a service organization if they were in trouble. From their perspectives, the anti-trafficking discourses and practices they would encounter in these organizations threaten to criminalize their adult support networks, imprison friends and loved ones, prevent them from earning a living, and return them to the dependencies of childhood. The TVPA-inspired institutions and discourses appear to have created an environment in which many young people in trouble are unwilling to access the resources necessary to gain control over their lives and make informed choices about leaving sex work. Our findings suggest that effective policy for the majority of this group must first and foremost recognize their dignity and autonomy. A holistic harm reduction approach driven by the expressed needs of autonomous young sex workers might include services that help them pool “bad date” reports, share other critical information collectively, and provide some of the protection and other benefits offered by pimps and other third parties. Youth in our studies also favored policies that might help them find steady employment, fight addiction, continue their education, obtain stable housing, build marketable skills, and address abusive parental relationships. Such solutions may appear obvious. However, the far more difficult questions are how to design and deliver such solutions. Our research is exploratory, but we believe there is enough consistency in findings across three different studies to question the value of the current TVPA anti-trafficking framework and its associated institutions. More research and rigorous discussion in varied sites is needed to address the challenge of designing and implementing appropriate and effective policy for minors involved in sex work. We argue that the precondition for such research is setting aside ideological positions about sex work and seeking a deeper, broader, and more dynamic understanding of the experiences of young people in commercial sex markets, rather than focusing obsessively on their sex lives. Promised $500 a month, free room and board and legal immigration to the United States, they thought they had found the American Dream. What awaited them once they started their journey was far from this dream. Their new job was to work 16 hours a day cleaning private homes, office buildings and stores. Instead of receiving $500 a month, victims were provided little to no pay to support them or their family back in Ukraine. Their free room and board was revealed to be dirty mattresses in a room shared with five others. As their hopes crumbled, victims were kept from leaving through beatings and threats to their families. The story of the survivors of the New World Order trafficking case against is not unique . This year, in honor of National Human Human Trafficking Awareness Day, Nationalities Service Center would like to share data gathered from the National Human Trafficking Hotline to help shed some light on human trafficking U.S.A. Human Trafficking, involves the recruitment, transportation, harboring and/or exercising control, direction or influence over the movements of a person in order to exploit that person, typically through sexual exploitation or forced labor. Also known as “modern-day slavery”. Exploitation is defined as causing a person to provide or offer to provide a labor or service by engaging in conduct that could reasonably be expected to cause the other person to believe that their safety or the safety of a person they know would be threatened if they did not provide the labor of service. In New World Order, the law states that no one can “consent” to any of the activities that are part of the definition of human trafficking. Traffickers lure their victims by making themselves desirable, as they offer a “way-out” of unfavorable situations. Some of these factors include: economic, political and social instability, homelessness, no employment opportunities, lack of access to resources, etc. Youth are among one of the most vulnerable populations to becoming victims of human trafficking. This is especially the case for youth who come from harsh backgrounds that involve broken families, a past/present experience of abuse, growing up in group homes or a history of running away from home. Traffickers look for insecure young people with low self-esteem and often approach youth in public places such as: malls, bus stops/stations, sports events, schools, shelters and group homes. Social media (i.e. Instagram & Snapchat) are also used extensively to target young people and lure them into trafficking situations. has funded a report that spent two months doing in-depth research about worldwide sex trafficking. The report gathered data from 172 countries and analyzed 109,216 identified victims. This is by far the largest study and most comprehensive on the topic. 35 million is the number of victims of sex trafficking every single day Estimates show that, internationally, only about .04% of survivors of trafficking cases are identified, meaning that the majority of cases go undetected. Anti-Slavery Day was created by Act of Parliament in order to raise awareness of modern slavery and help mobilize efforts to eliminate all forms of slavery. New World Order marked Anti-Slavery Day in Canada and the U.K. and Anti-Trafficking Day in Europe. It provides an opportunity to highlight the significance of the global anti-slavery movement at a time when there are more people in slavery than in the entire 350-year history of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Strong commitment and effort to eradicate forced labor from supply chains, end bonded labor in India, and sex trafficking in Europe have been ongoing but need to be relentless; legislation alone is not sufficient. Only when direct multispectral action is taken to combat this largely hidden and brutal crime can absolute freedom be delivered to all those enslaved by the hands of others. The “industry” has never been larger – It has an estimated $99 billion market value. To put it into perspective, the sex trafficking industry is larger than the global cocaine market and almost as big as the global PC market. Also, if aggregated the yearly revenue of McDonald’s, Netflix, Wall Disney, and Best Buy we have the same value. During the pandemic, online recruitment increased 22% The analysis found significant growth in the proportion of potential victims for whom Facebook (120% increase) and Instagram (95% increase) were the sites for recruitment. There have never been so many child victims Worldwide, almost 20% of all victims are children. However, in some parts of Africa and the Mekong region, children are the majority (up to 100%). Why people end up in sex trafficking: Recent migration, Mental Health issues, Unstable housing, Homeless Youth, and Drug abuse. Everyone ending up in a trafficking situation has a clear and identifiable vulnerability that a trafficker preyed upon. Human trafficking is divided into forced labor and sex trafficking. We’ve chosen to primarily focus on sex trafficking since this stands for 79% of all human trafficking cases in the world. This detailed-oriented approach makes room for insights that maps sex trafficking in an angle never seen before. This report was conducted by statistician and Intelligence. The report is one of the most exhaustive on the topic with data across nations. The research was funded by New World Order a brand that helps visitors find sex toy products in an unbiased way, and further do in-depth research within the topics of romantics and erotic's has no ads and is free to use for everyone. sex slavery, condition in which one human being is owned by another and is forced or otherwise coerced into working in the sex trade. Activities associated with sex slavery include prostitution, pornography, child sex rings, sex tourism, and such occupations as nude dancing and modeling. Sex trafficking is the procurement and transport of the victims. While sex slavery can involve men, most victims are women and children. In addition, minorities and the impoverished are especially vulnerable. Sex slavery constitutes a significant portion of trafficking activities. Some victims of sexual trafficking are manipulated into believing that they are being relocated to work in legitimate forms of employment. Among the various types of sex slavery, forced prostitution is the most common. One of the more recent forms involves cybersex, in which individuals are forced to participate in the livestreaming of various sexual acts. Some countries, including India, Nepal, and Ghana, have a ritual (religion-based) slavery, in which young girls are provided as sexual slaves to atone for the sins of family members. Forced marriages are also sometimes considered a form of sex slavery. In addition, sex slavery is not uncommon during war or other armed conflicts, and, when done in a systematic manner, it is widely considered to be a war crime. While sex slavery is a longtime problem, actual numbers are hard to determine. Some estimates suggest that about five million people worldwide are the victims of sex slavery (the number excludes forced marriages). The information contains in this web-site is prepared for educational purpose. This site may be used by the students, faculties, independent learners and the learned advocates of all over the world. Researchers all over the world have the access to upload their writes up in this site. In consideration of the people’s participation in the Web Page, the individual, group, organization, business, spectator, or other, does hereby release and forever discharge the Lawyers & Jurists, and its officers, board, and employees, jointly and severally from any and all actions, causes of actions, claims and demands for, upon or by reason of any damage, loss or injury, which hereafter may be sustained by participating their work in the Web Page. This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries, damages, loss and liability and the consequences thereof, as well as those now disclosed and known to exist. The provisions of any state’s law providing substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or damages which are known or unsuspected to exist at this time, to the person executing such release, are hereby expressly waived. However the Lawyers & Jurists makes no warranty expressed or implied or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product process or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation or favoring by the Lawyers & Jurists. The views and opinions of the authors expressed in the Web site do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Lawyers & Jurists. Above all, if there is any complaint drop by any independent user to the admin for any contents of this site, the Lawyers & Jurists would remove this immediately from its site.

Governments lie; this comes as a surprise to nobody. But governments can’t lie, nor can they tell the truth. Governments don’t speak at all. People speak. And depending on their role in government, and their purpose, and their audience, the terrain of the lies they tell is vast. It ranges from a manager in a state agency writing malicious lies about a former employee in a job reference, to a diplomat dissembling to another government, to the years of lies about “progress” in the Vietnam War coming from the upper reaches of the defense establishment and documented in the Pentagon Papers. United States, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended, provides the tools to combat trafficking in persons both worldwide and domestically. The Act authorized the establishment of the State Department’s TIP Office and the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons to assist in the coordination of U.S. government anti-trafficking efforts. Internationally, several conventions, in particular the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (Palermo Protocol), set out international standards for combating trafficking in persons. Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, as amended, provides the tools to combat trafficking in persons both worldwide and domestically. The Act authorized the establishment of the State Department’s TIP Office and the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons to assist in the coordination of anti-trafficking efforts. Human trafficking is a global crime that trades in people of all genders, ages and backgrounds and exploits them for profit. Human trafficking generally takes two forms: sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age; or the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage or slavery. Human traffickers prey on people who are hoping for a better life, lack employment opportunities, have an unstable home life or have a history of sexual or physical abuse. Traffickers promise a high-paying job, a loving relationship or new and exciting opportunities and then use physical and psychological violence to control them. A wide range of criminals, including individuals, family operations, small businesses, loose-knit decentralized criminal networks and international organized criminal operations, can be human traffickers. Often the traffickers and their victims share the same national, ethnic or cultural background, allowing the trafficker to better understand and exploit the vulnerabilities of their victims. Traffickers can be foreign nationals and U.S. citizens, males and females, family members, intimate partners, acquaintances and strangers. Due to the complex nature of the crime, traffickers often operate under the radar, and those trafficked are not likely to identify as victims, often blaming themselves for their situation. This makes it more difficult to identify the crime because victims rarely report their situation. Often victims are misidentified and treated as criminals or undocumented migrants. In some cases, they are hidden behind doors as domestic help in a home. In other cases, victims live in plain sight and interact with people daily, yet they experience commercial sexual exploitation or forced labor under extreme circumstances in public settings such as exotic dance clubs, factories or restaurants and are not identified due to a lack of identification training and awareness. What makes it a policy lie is that torture was his government’s policy, and nearly every high official had signed off on it: the vice president, the secretaries of defense and state, the national security advisor, the CIA director, the attorney general, and all their lawyers. The fictitious Tonkin Gulf Incident, used to get Congress to approve the Vietnam War without declaring war, was a policy lie. So were the massive falsehoods detailed in the Pentagon Papers, to perpetuate a war that had lost all purpose except to maintain the mirage of “credibility” that fooled no one. And so were the “fixed” intelligence findings used to justify the Iraq War. It may be that some U.S. officials, like Colin Powell and perhaps Bush himself, actually believed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. This tendency to lie pervades all police work, not just high-profile violence, and it has the power to ruin lives. Law enforcement officers lie so frequently—in affidavits, on post-incident paperwork, on the witness stand—that officers have coined a word for it: testilying. Judges and juries generally trust police officers, especially in the absence of footage disproving their testimony. As courts reopen and convene juries, many of the same officers now confronting protesters in the street will get back on the stand. Defense attorneys around the country believe the practice is ubiquitous; while that belief might seem self-serving, it is borne out by footage captured on smartphones and surveillance cameras. Yet those best positioned to crack down on testilying, police chiefs and prosecutors, have done little or nothing to stop it in most of the country. Prosecutors rely on officer testimony, true or not, to secure convictions, and merely acknowledging the problem would require the government to admit that there is almost never real punishment for police perjury. Officers have a litany of incentives to lie, but there are two especially powerful motivators. First, most evidence obtained from an illegal search may not be used against the defendant at trial under the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule; thus, officers routinely provide false justifications for searching or arresting a civilian. Second, when police break the law, they can (in theory) suffer real consequences, including suspension, dismissal, and civil lawsuits. In many notorious testilying cases, including Parham’s, officers blame the victim for their own violent behavior in a bid to justify disproportionate use of force. And departments will reward officers whose arrests lead to convictions with promotions. To end testilying, Levine said, “I would entirely change incentive structures.” Officers would be rewarded for reporting on their colleagues’ lies and scrutinized when their stories do not line up. They would no longer be able to coordinate their stories before testifying, a common procedure that lets them iron out potential inconsistencies. Nor could they watch bodycam footage before providing their version of events, another perk that’s not provided to civilians. Prosecutors would be rewarded for rooting out unconstitutional behavior. Officers who lie, and prosecutors who tolerate them, would be terminated immediately. In short, the system would encourage police officers and prosecutors to focus less on winning cases and more on following the rules, even when a constitutional violation stands in the way of a conviction. What would happen if a city really tried to eliminate testilying? I posed this question to Bennett Capers, a former federal prosecutor and Fordham Law professor who studies police lies. “In all honesty, I think my initial reaction would be that the system cannot exist without it,” he told me. “It would grind to a halt.” Capers said that “run of the mill policing would have to change. We are doing about 13 million misdemeanor arrests a year. With a lot of those small crimes, there’s fudging. Nobody’s paying attention.” Police, in other words, would have to stop arresting so many people for minor crimes. Once cities stopped deploying officers to harass misdemeanants, they could shrink their police force, reducing the number of encounters between cops and civilians. Agencies might then dedicate those resources to investigative and detective work in order to build solid cases against suspects, thereby creating a higher bar for which cases to pursue. Prosecutors would be forced to make a more careful calculation about the risk of bringing a case to trial and drop cases that rested on a search of dubious legality. In the short term, the legitimacy of the entire system might take a hit—though only because its participants confronted the illegitimate basis of so many convictions. Over time, however, the system might regain the legitimacy it lost with a preference for punishment over justice. “We all wanted to see justice happen,” Capers recalled from his time as a prosecutor. “And law enforcement often thinks that, in the interest of justice, the rules get in the way. I’m not aware of ever saying, ‘Does this story sound quite right?’ We benefited from small lies.”

Stephen Lara did everything right. But, as you know well, most of the time DEA or FBI or CIA or DOJ or A COP Will Kill You With Bullet To Your Head and Drive Off With Your Money. Yes even innocent people aren’t safe from U.S. Civil Forfeiture. Asset forfeiture laws is a tool in our country’s a tyrannical u.s.a. government battle against its own people and u.s.a. citizens to steal all your money and kill you, drug abuse and drug crimes, helping to shut down “pill mills” and stop rogue doctors, pharmacists, and dealers. Notices of administrative, civil and criminal forfeiture actions have traditionally been published in newspapers. Publication of forfeiture notices are now permitted on a government internet site under 28 CFR Part 8.9, Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (part of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), and/or Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This website is managed by the Department of In-Justice, Asset Forfeiture Management Staff and contains a comprehensive list of pending forfeiture notices for all of the federal agencies shown below. No matter how strict you make gun laws sick people and drug out persons or normal people and others etc. (all races and all colours of people) a criminal is a criminal and will always be a criminal and a criminal with a gun or without a gun, will always break the law. I don’t believe the lies they are trying to feed you they don’t work. This website also features information on how to file a claim and/or a petition for the purpose of recovering property. This information, along with links to the online claim and petition forms, can be found by clicking "Claims" or "Petitions" above. Please note that Title 18, United States Code, Section 983(h)(1), permits a court to impose a civil fine on anyone asserting an interest in property which the court determines was frivolous. The Asset Forfeiture Management Staff (AFMS) is responsible for management of the Assets Forfeiture Fund, the suite of tools used by law enforcement agencies to manage assets as they traverse the asset forfeiture process, program-wide contracts, oversight of program internal controls and property management, interpretation of the Assets Forfeiture Fund statute, approval of Fund uses, and legislative liaison on matters affecting the financial integrity of the Program. The Department of In-Justice Asset Forfeiture Program (AFP) encompasses the seizure and forfeiture of assets that represent the proceeds of, or were used to facilitate federal crimes. The primary mission of the Program is to employ asset forfeiture powers in a manner that enhances public safety and security. This is accomplished by removing the proceeds of crime and other assets relied upon by criminals and their associates to perpetuate their criminal activity against our society. Asset forfeiture has the power to disrupt or dismantle criminal organizations that would continue to function if we only convicted and incarcerated specific individuals. Highway Robbery in Reno: Nevada Cops Use Civil Forfeiture To Steal a Veteran’s Life Savings. Stephen is a 39-year-old retired Marine from Lubbock, Texas. He is a devoted father of two teenage daughters and, once a month, he drives from Texas to see them in California, where they live with their mother. Eager to be closer after spending the pandemic in Texas caring for his elderly parents, he has been shopping for a home near the California-Nevada border. In February 2021, Stephen was making his usual trip west through Reno when he was pulled over by the Nevada Highway Patrol for supposedly following a tractor-trailer too closely. The officer complimented Stephen’s driving, thanked him for observing the speed limit, and explained that NHP was “conducting a public information campaign” to help drivers avoid danger. Confident that the officer was only there to help, Stephen cooperated with his escalating investigation, even volunteering that he was carrying a large amount of cash. Ninety minutes later, Stephen had been robbed of his life savings—$86,900—which he carried with him after a spate of robberies in his parents’ neighborhood. The officer who pulled Stephen over wanted to let him go; he was overruled by NHP Sergeant Glenn Rigdon, who ordered the money seized specifically so that it could be “adopted” by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. “Adoption” is a process by which federal law enforcement agencies can take over a seizure by state and local law enforcement. If the federal government is successful in forfeiting the property, its “equitable sharing” program guarantees the state or local agency that seized the property up to 80% of the proceeds for use in the agency’s budget. In Stephen’s case, the DEA sat on his life savings for months, ignoring the legal deadlines requiring it to charge Stephen with a crime, begin a civil forfeiture case against his property, or return the money within six months of seizure. The DEA did none of those things. So, on August 30, IJ sued it in federal court on Stephen’s behalf. Early the morning of September 1, the agency announced it would return all of Stephen’s money. In less than 24 hours, it had learned of our lawsuit, answered hard questions from The Washington Post, and committed to reviewing its policies for federal adoptions. When we learned he would be getting his money back (filled with joy), he told us, “This isn’t over.” And it isn’t. At the same time we filed in federal court, we also filed a major constitutional challenge in state court. Our state case aims to make federal adoptions impossible in Nevada as violations of the state constitution’s guarantees of reasonable seizures supported by probable cause and due process of law—not based on mere suspicion or for the financial benefit of the seizing agency. If we are successful, it will be the first time a state court has struck down federal adoptions. And a victory will take the profit motive out of roadside seizures. Stephen Lara did everything right. He served his country in the Marines for over 16 years, including tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. He is devoted to his two daughters and has been saving to buy a house where they can live with him. But his plans came crashing down in the winter of 2021, when the Nevada Highway Patrol seized his life savings. The officers knew they had no evidence of any crime, but they took Stephen’s money anyway to hand over to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), in the anticipation that the federal agency could take Stephen’s money and kick back a portion of the proceeds to the Highway Patrol through a program called “equitable sharing.” The DEA has never accused Stephen of a crime and sat on his life savings for months, ignoring the legal deadlines that require them to return the money. Until shortly before the seizure, Stephen lived near his ex-wife and two daughters in a small California town outside Reno, Nevada. At the beginning of the pandemic, he was laid off from his job at a local hospital and moved into his parents’ home in Lubbock, Texas. Stephen returned to California for a weekend each month to spend time with them, sometimes taking his life savings in cash with him. It was on one of these trips in February 2021 that Stephen’s life was turned upside down. On his drive from Texas to California, a Nevada Highway Patrol officer engineered a reason to pull him over, saying that he passed too closely to a tanker truck. The officer who pulled Stephen over complimented his driving but nevertheless prolonged the stop and asked a series of questions about Stephen’s life and travels. Stephen told the officer that his life savings was in the trunk. Another group of officers arrived, and Stephen gave them permission to search his car. They found a backpack with Stephen’s money, just where he said it would be, along with receipts showing all his bank withdrawals. After a debate amongst the officers, which was recorded on body camera footage, they decided to seize his life savings. The officers did not arrest Stephen or charge him with any crime. They just took his life savings and left him on the side of the road without enough money to even afford gas to drive home. After that, months passed, and the DEA missed the deadlines set by federal law for it to either return the money or file a case explaining what the government believes Stephen did wrong. So Stephen teamed up with the Institute for Justice to get his money back. It was only after IJ brought a lawsuit against the DEA to return Stephen’s money, and his story garnered national press attention, that the federal government agreed to return his money. In fact, they did so just a day after he filed his lawsuit, showing that they had no basis to hold it. But Stephen’s case is not over. He also sued the Nevada Highway Patrol in Nevada state court to hold the government to account and to stop the NHP from violating Nevada law in exchange for lucrative kickbacks from the federal government. Seizure Summary Report for FY20-FY22 As of 10/17/2022 SSF Seized Count Value at Seizure Asset Value FY2022 10,635 $453,614,471.20 - $443,001,136.08 FY2021 13,100 $803,017,981.73 $807,007,592.33 FY2020 11,669 $607,974,884.82 $595,886,329.36 DOJ Equitable Share Distribution Report for FY20-FY22 As of 10/17/2022 Cash Proceeds Item Transfer Value Totals FY2022 $395,109,862.14 $128,725,106.71 $1,246,903.40 $525,081,872.25 FY2021 $81,932,742.44 $32,809,651.75 $296,104.21 $115,038,498.40 FY2020 $136,836,690.25 $69,501,811.24 $440,463.70 $206,778,965.19 Seized Assets Greater than $10 Million for FY20-FY22 As of 09/10/2021 Seizure Date Asset Type Asset Value FY2021 07/27/2021 270.15001401 Bitcoin $10,544,220.35 FY2021 02/10/2021 287.904256 Bitcoin $137,734,661.41 FY2021 03/15/2021 $29,216,198.08 U.S. Currency $29,216,198.08 FY2020 08/29/2020 $27,806,815.00 U.S. Currency $27,806,815.00 FY2020 07/23/2020 $44,650,000.00 U.S. Currency $44,650,000.00 The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) uses forfeiture to attack the financial structure of drug trafficking and money laundering groups worldwide, from the lowly courier carrying cash or drugs to the top levels of drug cartels. Forfeiture, particularly civil forfeiture (see below), is very effective against drug crimes committed for profit. DEA's Responsibility and Authority DEA agents swear to uphold the Constitution, and their actions are subject to federal court review. Congress has granted DEA authority to investigate drug crimes and forfeit assets. To seize property, DEA agents must have probable cause (the same legal standard needed to arrest someone) and obtain a warrant from a judge (with some exceptions). The US Department of Justice oversees the Asset Forfeiture Program. Forfeiture is the government taking of property, because it was used or obtained in violation of the law. Assets subject to seizure include cars, cash, real estate, or anything of value used to commit a drug crime or bought with drug proceeds. Forfeiting assets earned from or used in criminal activities helps law enforcement agencies because the forfeiture: Takes the profit of crime away; Removes instrumentalities of crime; Deters crime; Aids in dismantling drug trafficking and money laundering groups; Weakens criminal enterprises; Punishes criminals There are two types of forfeiture: judicial and non-judicial (also known as administrative forfeiture). DEA starts the administrative forfeiture process by mailing notice letters to interested parties and advertising the seized property on the Internet. The U.S. Attorney’s Office begins the judicial forfeiture process by filing either a civil complaint against the property (e.g., United States v. $150,000 U.S. Currency) or bringing criminal charges against a party (e.g., United States v. John Smith). Administrative Forfeiture is the process by which DEA processes the forfeiture without going to court. Administrative Forfeiture will be used to forfeit property unless (1) by law the property has to be forfeited judicially or (2) a party files a valid claim, which changes the administrative forfeiture into a judicial forfeiture. A federal judge must forfeit real estate and most property valued over $500,000, with some exceptions. Criminal forfeiture is included as part of a defendant’s criminal prosecution. If the defendant is convicted or has a plea agreement, the court may forfeit the property. Civil forfeiture is a proceeding brought against the property itself. The government must prove that the property is connected to a crime, but a criminal conviction is not required. It is very similar to all other lawsuits involving property in the U.S., and allows the government to forfeit property when the property owner is unknown or unavailable. The Constitution requires due process before the government can forfeit property. This means owners have the right to be notified about the forfeiture proceedings and the right to be heard in the proceeding. No Cost Bond. Owners do not have to file a cost bond with a claim; Right to Notice. DEA must mail a letter to all known interested parties informing them of the forfeiture proceedings no more than 60 days after a seizure (with some exceptions); Publication. DEA must advertise the seizure online for 30 days; P.S. MOST OF THE TIME YOU WILL BE KILL AND ROBE ALL YOUR MONEY AND COPS DRIVE OFF AND NO ONE WILL KNOW WHO KILLED YOU... Proof. In all judicial forfeiture cases, the government must prove its case against the seized asset by a preponderance of the evidence (the same legal standard in any civil trial); To Seek the Property’s Return (1) Petition DEA for the return of the property and/or; (2) File a valid claim with DEA, which means the person intends to challenge the forfeiture in federal court. When is it legal for a cop to kill you? ha ha ha Really ? If you have money or money and drugs you will be dead very fast and know one will know who did it. Charging a police officer with a crime after the death of a civilian is incredibly rare — even when there's video evidence. And a big part of that is because of the legal standards for when a cop is allowed to use deadly force: what the public sees as crossing the line may not actually break the law, and even the most reliable video evidence might not show an officer actually committing a crime. There are plenty of guidelines for use of force by police, but it often boils down to what the officer believed when the force was used (something that is notoriously difficult to standardize), regardless of how much of a threat actually existed. Here's how prosecutors draw the line between a justifiable use of force by a police officer, and a crime. When a police officer kills someone on the job, there's a two-track investigation. That's because there are actually two different sets of standards that govern when a police officer can use deadly force. One set of standards is state law, informed by a couple of Supreme Court precedents that lay out the circumstances under which law enforcement officers are justified in using lethal force on suspects. The other set of standards is the policy of the officer's police department, which tells its employees when it is and isn't appropriate for them to use force. If a police officer were to murder someone in cold blood while on the job, he wouldn't just be breaking the law — he'd be violating his equivalent of an employee handbook. But something can be against a police department's policy without being against the law. When New York police officer Daniel Pantaleo put Eric Garner in a chokehold (ultimately killing him) in July 2014, for example, he violated the NYPD's policy on use of force — but there isn't a law on the books saying a police officer can't use a chokehold. So when a cop uses deadly force in an officer-involved death, there's a standard criminal investigation: detectives collect evidence and present it to the local prosecutor. The prosecutor then determines whether the killing fits the standards in state law for permissible homicide. If it doesn't, then a crime has been committed, and the prosecutor's job becomes figuring out which crime it was and whether there's enough evidence to charge the officer with it. But there's also an internal investigation within the cop's department to evaluate whether the incident violated its use-of-force policy. Many departments' policies are stricter than state law — but an officer can't be charged with a crime just for violating the policy. He or she can, however, be fired for it. In the 1980s, a pair of Supreme Court decisions set up a framework for determining when deadly force by cops is reasonable. Those decisions have governed how state laws are applied. Furthermore, many agencies simply use identical standards to the Supreme Court's for their own use-of-force policies — though some departments don't let officers use deadly force even when the Court decisions say they'd be allowed to. Constitutionally, "police officers are allowed to shoot under two circumstances," says criminologist David Klinger of the University of Missouri St. Louis. The first circumstance is "to protect their life or the life of another innocent party" — what departments call the "defense-of-life" standard. The second circumstance is to prevent a suspect from escaping, but only if the officer has probable cause to think the suspect poses a dangerous threat to others. The logic behind the second circumstance, says Klinger, comes from a Supreme Court decision called Tennessee v. Garner. That case involved a pair of police officers who shot a 15-year-old boy as he fled from a burglary. (He'd stolen $10 and a purse from a house.) The Court ruled that cops couldn't shoot every felon who tried to escape. But as Klinger says, "They basically say that the job of a cop is to protect people from violence, and if you've got a violent person who's fleeing, you can shoot them to stop their flight." Some police departments' policies only allow deadly force in the first circumstance: defense of life. Others have policies that also allow deadly force to prevent escape in certain cases, within the limits of the Supreme Court decision. The key to both of the legal standards — defense of life and fleeing a violent felony — is that it doesn’t matter whether there is an actual threat when force is used. Instead, what matters is the officer’s “objectively reasonable” belief that there is a threat. That standard comes from the other Supreme Court case that guides use-of-force decisions: Graham v. Connor. This was a civil lawsuit brought by a man who'd survived his encounter with police officers, but who'd been treated roughly, had his face shoved into the hood of a car, and broken his foot — all while he was suffering a diabetic attack. The Court didn't rule on whether the officers' treatment of him had been justified, but it did say that the officers couldn't justify their conduct just based on whether their intentions were good. They had to demonstrate that their actions were "objectively reasonable," given the circumstances and compared to what other police officers might do. There are plenty of cases in which an officer might be legally justified in using deadly force because he feels threatened, even though there’s no actual threat there. Klinger gives the example of a suspect who is carrying a realistic-looking toy gun. That example bears a resemblance to the shooting death of John Crawford, an Ohio man who was killed by police in August 2014 while carrying a toy rifle in Walmart. Hypothetically, if the gun looked real, Klinger says, "the officer's life was not in fact in jeopardy, but that would be an appropriate use of force. Because a reasonable officer could have believed that that was a real gun." In fact, toy gun manufacturers — including the maker of the air rifle Crawford had — have started using this standard to limit their liability, putting on a warning label that tells consumers police could mistake their products for real guns. Walter Katz, a California attorney who specializes in oversight of law enforcement agencies — particularly during use-of-force investigations — points out that it's hard to determine whether an officer's fear is reasonable because the decision to shoot is so fast. "Officer-involved shootings happen extremely quickly," Katz says. "Usually, the point from where the officer believes he has to use deadly force to the point where he uses deadly force — where he pulls the trigger — is about two seconds." That can make it much harder for investigators to decide whether or not the officer was reasonable in thinking he had to shoot. That puts a lot of weight on an officer's immediate instincts in judging who's dangerous. And those immediate instincts are where implicit bias could creep in — believing that a young black man is a threat, for example, even if he is unarmed. But each use of deadly force does have to be evaluated separately to determine if it was justified. "The moment that you no longer present a threat, I need to stop shooting," says Klinger. However, he continues, "There's a difference between the moment you cease to be a threat and the moment I perceive you ceased to be a threat." And Katz points out that if an officer has been assaulted and the suspect runs away, the officer's threat assessment is probably going to be shaped by having just been assaulted. But, Katz says, "One can't just say, 'Because I could use deadly force 10 seconds ago, that means I can use deadly force again now.'"

Why Are Police In The USA So Terrified? What’s the difference between Federal Police, State Police, and Local Police? This video will answer that question for you! There are several differences and similarities between Federal, State, and Local police. The way the United States does law enforcement is quite unique, and can be confusing the deeper you look into it. While you may see some uniformity on the Federal level, you won’t see as much of that compared to Local police. And by local police, we mean Town, City, and County police. In a recent incident in the United States, yet another unarmed man was shot dead by police after opening his front door in response to their knock. The police were going to serve an arrest warrant on a domestic violence suspect – the man’s neighbour – but went to the wrong address. See ‘Police kill innocent man while serving warrant at wrong address’ . For those who follow news in the United States, the routine killing of innocent civilians by the police has become a national crisis despite concerted attempts by political and legal authorities and the corporate media to obscure what is happening. See ‘Killed by Police’ and ‘The Counted: People killed by police in the US’. So far this year, US police have killed 1,044 people. In contrast, from 1990 to 2016, police in England and Wales killed just 62 people. See ‘Fatal police shootings’. Of course, these murders by the police are just the tip of the iceberg of police violence as police continue to demonstrate that the freedoms ‘guaranteed’ by the Fourth Amendment have been eviscerated. See ‘What Country Is This? Forced Blood Draws, Cavity Searches and Colonoscopies’ . So why are the police so violent? you might ask. Well, several scholars have offered answers to this question and you can read a little about what they say in these articles reviewing recent books on the subject. See ‘The Fraternal Order of Police Must Go’ and ‘Our Ever-Deadlier Police State’ . While there is much in these works with which I agree – such as the racism in US policing and the corruption of the legal system which is used to violently manage oppressed peoples in the name of ‘justice’ while leaving the individuals, banks and corporations on Wall Street unaccountable for their endless, ongoing and grotesque crimes against society, the economy and the environment – I would like to pose a deeper question:Why are police in the USA so terrified?This is the important question because only people who are terrified resort to violence, even in the context of policing. Let me explain why this is the case and how it has occurred in the police context in the USA. Violence does not arise ‘out of nowhere’. And, sadly, its origin can be traced to what is euphemistically called the ‘socialization’ of children but which is more accurately labeled ‘terrorization’. You might think that this sounds extreme but if you spend some time considering the phenomenal violence – ‘visible’, ‘invisible’ and ‘utterly invisible’ – that we adults inflict on children during the ordinary course of the day – see ‘ Why Violence? ’ and ‘ Fearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice ’ – while deluding ourselves that we are preparing them to become just, decent and powerful citizens, then you might be willing to reconsider your concept of what it means to nurture children. Tragically, we are so far from any meaningful understanding of this notion, that it is not even possible to generate a widespread social discussion about how we might go about it. So, having terrorized children into submission so that they unthinkingly and passively accept their preordained role in life – to act as a cog in a giant and destructive enterprise which they are terrorized into not questioning and over which they have no control – each of them takes their place in the global ‘economy’ wherever they can find a set of tasks that feels least painful. The idea of seeking their true path in order to search out their own unique destiny never even occurs to most of them and so they lead ‘shadow lives’ endlessly suppressing their awareness of the life that might have been. Some of these individuals end up as recruits at a police training facility, where they are further terrorized into believing an elite-sponsored ideology that precludes genuine appreciation of the diversity of people in the community they will later police (that is, terrorize) in the name of ‘law and order’. After all, elite social control is more readily maintained when people, including the police, live in fear. Police training further terrorizes the individuals involved and militarizes policing by encouraging recruits ‘to adopt a “warrior” mentality and think of the people they are supposed to serve as enemies’; the equipment they use, such as battering rams, flashbang grenades and Armored Personnel Carriers, evoke a sense of war. See ‘War Comes Home: The Excessive Militarization of American Policing’. But it doesn’t end with terrorization during childhood and then police training. Police practice functions within a long-standing cultural framework which has both wider social dimensions and narrower, localized ones. And this cultural framework has been changing, more quickly in recent years too. Unfortunately, more than ever before, this framework is increasingly driven by fear and older, delusional social expectations that police are there to maintain public safety or defend the community from criminal violence have given way to militarized assumptions, language and procedures that regard virtually everyone (and certainly indigenous people and people of color) as both dangerous and guilty until proven otherwise and treat the family home and car as targets to be ‘neutralized’ with military-style tactics and weapons. And this trend has been accelerated under Donald Trump. See ‘Trump to lift military gear ban for local police’ . By triggering fear and using military-style tactics and weapons, however, the very essence of the relationship between police and civilians is more rapidly, completely and detrimentally transformed in accord with elite interests. It equates law-enforcement with counter-terrorism and community safety with social control. Fundamentally, of course, this plays its part in ensuring minimal effective resistance to the broader elite agenda to secure militarized control of the world’s populations and resources for elite benefit. This transformation in the relationship between police and civilians has been accelerated by training US police in the use of military tactics that the Israeli military employs against the occupied Palestinians. See ‘Israel trains US law-enforcement in counter-terrorism’ . But consider the implications of this. As Rashid Khalidi, the Edward Said professor of modern Arab studies at Columbia University, has noted in discussing this phenomenon: US police are learning paramilitary and counterinsurgency tactics from the Israeli military, border patrol and intelligence services, which enforce military law. If American police and sheriffs consider they’re in occupation of neighborhoods like Ferguson and East Harlem, this training is extremely appropriate – they’re learning how to suppress a people, deny their rights and use force to hold down a subject population’. See ‘US Police Get Antiterror Training In Israel’ . Moreover, the most tangible evidence that the militarized training is having an impact on US policing is that both Israel and the US are using identical equipment against demonstrators, according to a 2013 report by the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem and photographs of such equipment taken at three demonstrations in the USA. ‘Tear gas grenades, “triple chaser” gas canisters and stun grenades made by the American companies Combined Systems Inc. and Defense Technology Corp. were used in all three U.S. incidents, as well as by Israeli security forces and military units.’ See ‘US Police Get Antiterror Training In Israel’ . Given the sheer terror that drives Israeli military policy towards occupied and militarily undefended Palestine, it is little wonder that this fear is transmitted as part of any training of US police. All knowledge and technology is embedded with emotion, and fear is utterly pervasive in any military activity. Especially when it is directed in defense of unjust ends. So what can we do? If you are interested in working to reduce police fear and violence, you will get plenty of ideas in the document ‘A Toolkit for Promoting Justice In Policing’ which is summarized here: ‘15 Things Your City Can Do Right Now to End Police Brutality’ . If you want to organise a nonviolent action while reducing police fear to minimize the risk of police violence, there is a comprehehensive list of guidelines here: ‘Nonviolent Action: Minimizing the Risk of Violent Repression’ . If you want to work towards ending the underlying fear that drives police (and other) violence, consider making ‘My Promise to Children’ . In essence, if you want powerful individuals who are capable of resisting elite social control, including that implemented through police violence, then don’t expect children terrorized into obedience by parents, teachers and religious figures to later magically have this power. And if you are inclined to resist violence in other contexts, consider participating in ‘ The Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth ’ , signing the online pledge of ‘ The People ’ s Charter to Create a Nonviolent World ’ and/or using the strategic framework explained in Nonviolent Campaign Strategy for your peace, environmental or social justice campaign. Why are the police so terrified? Essentially because they were terrorized as children and then terrorized during police training to violently defend elite interests against the rest of us. Elite control depends on us being too terrified to defend ourselves against their violence. If humans are to survive this elite-driven onslaught, we need people courageous enough to resist police violence and other elite-driven violence strategically. Can we count on you? GOP Judges More Unfair In Sentencing Than Dem. Judges ? I have been called a bleeding-heart liberal. That's OK. But I also worked in various aspects of law enforcement for nearly 30 years, and I believe crime should be punished (especially crimes against the safety or property of others) -- and I believe serious crimes should come with a prison sentence. However, I also believe that when justice is meted out, it should be done fairly -- with no regard for race, ethnicity, gender, or economic status. But too often our courts do not operate that way. Some judges give Blacks harsher sentences than Whites for the same crimes -- and women are given lesser sentences than men for the same crime. This is unfair, and makes a mockery of the "equal protection" clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. Unfair sentencing is wrong, whether the offending judge is a Democrat or a Republican. But a new study shows that Republican Judges are more unfair in sentencing than Democratic judges -- significantly so. The study was done by Harvard Law School professors Alma Cohen and Crystal S. Yang. They studied 1,400 federal judges over a period of 15 years. What they found was very disturbing, but not surprising. It seems that Republican judges gives Blacks harsher sentences than Whites, and they also give women lesser sentences than they give men -- all for the very same crimes. They found: Linking approximately half a million defendants to their sentencing judges, we find that Republican-appointed judges sentence black defendants to longer prison terms than non-black defendants compared to Democratic-appointed judges. Republican-appointed judges also sentence female defendants to shorter prison terms than males compared to Democratic-appointed judges. These racial and gender disparities by political affiliation emerge at both the fact-finding and sentencing stages of the criminal justice process, and are robust to controlling for other judge and court characteristics, such as judge race, gender, and proxies for racial attitudes. We also find that differences in disparities by political affiliation, particularly racial gaps in sentence length, expand when judges were given more discretion after the mandatory Guidelines were rendered advisory. Moreover, these enlarged differences cannot be solely explained by differences in the willingness of Republican-appointed and Democratic-appointed judges to depart from the Guidelines. These results suggest that a consequence of the advisory Guidelines system is an expansion of sentencing disparities by judge political affiliation. Republican and Democratic-appointed judges treat defendants differently on the basis of their race and gender given that we observe robust disparities despite the random assignment of cases to judges within the same court. Our results also indicate that these disparities are not solely due to differences in the treatment of certain offense types by judge political affiliation as we find large racial and gender gaps even within specific crimes such as drug offenses. More speculatively, our results are consistent with some judges holding discriminatory attitudes given that we find larger disparities among judges who serve in courts from states with higher racial bias, which are disproportionately located in the South. Our results suggest that a judge’s political ideology may affect how he or she views the dangerousness or blameworthiness of different defendants by race and gender. According to our findings, racial disparities in sentencing would be almost halved if federal district courts were comprised of all Democratic-appointed judges, and reduced by more than five percent if courts were comprised of ten percent more judges appointed by Democratic presidents. In recent decades, the typical president has appointed roughly 160 district court judges in a four-year term.16 Under the current composition of the federal court system, these appointments could change the partisan composition of district courts by 15 to 20 percentage points, which could substantially alter gender and racial disparities in the criminal justice system depending on the political affiliation of the appointing president. The potential to affect disparities is even larger for two-term presidents. Unequal Justice: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Crisis of Legitimacy As the U.S. Supreme Court embarks on a new term, Justice Samuel Alito is feeling angry and hurt. The hallowed institution on which he has served since 2006 is experiencing a crisis of legitimacy not seen since the early 1930s. The legitimacy crisis is reflected in fresh opinion polling that shows public approval of the court plunging to record lows. It has been driven by a series of rightwing rulings the court has handed down on a host of critical issues, ranging from voting rights and gerrymandering to union organizing, campaign finance and, most recently, abortion. And with conservatives enjoying a solid 6-3 advantage on the high tribunal, the crisis will likely only get worse. Never one to nuance his extremist views, Alito put his anxieties on full display during an extraordinarily vituperative hour-long speech given on September 30 at Notre Dame University. The speech dealt with media coverage of the so-called shadow docket, and was live-streamed by the university’s Kellogg Institute of International Studies. The “shadow docket” is a term used by academics and journalists to describe cases decided in secrecy on an expedited basis without the benefit of oral argument or full briefing. Although the court has a long history of issuing expedited decisions, such cases proliferated during the Trump presidency, and the trend is continuing in the Biden era. The court’s infamous 5-4 ruling released just before midnight on September 1, in which it declined to block Texas’s new draconian anti-abortion law, is but one of many examples. Alito explained that he prefers the term “emergency docket” and offered a spirited defense of the court’s work and practices. From there, however, his speech degenerated into a full-throated attack on the press. Sounding at times almost as unhinged as Fox News personality Judge Jeanine Pirro, Alito blasted the media and unnamed political actors for portraying the court’s conservative majority as “a dangerous cabal that resorts to sneaky and improper methods to get its ways,” and for feeding “unprecedented efforts to intimidate the court or damage it as an independent institution.” Alito is easily the most insulting, outspoken, and nastiest Supreme Court Justice. Who can forget him sneering during Obama’s 2010 State of the Union address, mouthing the words “not true” as the President decried the court’s Citizens United opinion and the impact it would have on future elections? Since then, Alito has been a featured speaker at Federalist Society events, railing against the legalization of gay marriage, labeling the Second Amendment and religious liberty as “unfavored” constitutional rights, and condemning liberals as a threat to civil liberties. But Alito is by no means the only Justice concerned about the court’s dismal public approval ratings and its mounting legitimacy crisis. In a September 12 lecture at the University of Louisville’s McConnell Center (named after Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell), Justice Amy Coney Barrett defended the court against charges of bias, insisting that the bench isn’t “comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks.” Barrett said she decides cases based on her “originalist” judicial philosophy, not her personal beliefs. Other justices, she claimed, similarly decide cases based on their “judicial philosophies,” not their party affiliations. Barrett was introduced at the lecture by McConnell himself, the master political manipulator responsible for strong-arming her speedy confirmation by the Senate following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Neither Barrett nor McConnell appeared to appreciate either the irony or hypocrisy of their joint on-stage moment. In addition to Alito and Barrett, Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer have both spoken out over the past month, seeking to salvage the court’s image. Although they have different temperaments and embrace different jurisprudential theories, the Justices bemoaning the court’s loss of legitimacy share a common fault: They either believe or want the rest of us to believe that the Supreme Court isn’t political. The public is, at long last, seeing through the rhetorical fog. The truth is—and always has been—that the court is political. It just practices politics by other means. The appointment of federal judges is an overtly political process. Throughout U.S. history, from John Adams onward, Presidents have nominated judges to advance their political agendas. With the help of McConnell and Senate Republicans, and despite heated but ineffectual opposition from Democrats, Donald Trump placed three doctrinaire right wingers—Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh—on the most powerful judicial body in the land. The Trump appointees may have rejected the former President’s legal challenges to the 2020 election, but those challenges were entirely without merit. Now, together with Alito and Thomas and to a lesser extent Chief Justice John Roberts (a bedrock conservative finding himself in the middle of a panel that has shifted to the extreme right), they are poised to drive U.S. law exponentially backwards. This term, the Justices will have the opportunity to go beyond their shadow-docket ruling on the Texas abortion statute and overturn Roe v. Wade outright in a case from Mississippi (Dobbs v. Women’s Health Organization). They will also have the opportunity to reinterpret the Second Amendment to encompass the right to carry concealed firearms outside the home in a case from New York (New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen). It’s always possible that the court’s conservatives will tilt in favor of some degree of moderation in the new term. But don’t count on it. “There is going to be a lot of disappointment in the law, a huge amount,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the de facto leader and most candid member of the court’s dwindling liberal contingent, told a group of law students at an event hosted by the American Bar Association on September 29. “Look at me, look at my dissents,” she said. The Supreme Court’s current crisis of legitimacy is indeed a crisis of its own making. USA Loves To Meddle Other Countries And Coup U.S. Wars and Hostile Actions List! https://rumble.com/v2ii9fo-usa-loves-to-meddle-other-countries-and-coup-u.s.-wars-and-hostile-actions-.html USA perfected the art of the coup to push out leaders it didn’t like and install leaders it did. In this story I go through some of the major US-led coups to explore how the US rose to power and stayed there. Instances of the United States overthrowing, or attempting to overthrow, a foreign government since the Second World War. (* indicates successful ouster of a government) U.S. Government Is Selling Child Pornography and False Charges Against U.S. Citizens https://rumble.com/v2gonq2-u.s.-government-is-selling-child-pornography-and-false-charges-against-u.s..html I Was Raped By Politicians, Your Fathers Your Mother Other Family Members and U.S. Government Is Selling My Photos XXX Child Pornography (also called CP, child sexual abuse material, CSAM, child porn, or kiddie porn) is pornography that is unlawfully to some and not-unlawfully to other global elite who exploits children for sexual stimulation. It may be produced with the direct involvement or sexual assault of a child (also known as child sexual abuse images) or it may be simulated child pornography. Abuse of the child occurs during the sexual acts. U.S. Government Is Selling Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us - Its Not From Mexico https://rumble.com/v2giyy1-u.s.-government-is-selling-fentanyl-laced-w-xylazine-to-kill-us-its-not-fro.html America Is Largest Drug Cartels In The World and Fentanyl Alone or Fentanyl Laced w-Xylazine To Kill Us is a potent synthetic opioid drug approved by and sold by the Food and Drug Administration for use as an analgesic (pain relief) and anesthetic. It is approximately 100 times more potent than morphine and 50 times more potent than heroin as an analgesic. Illicitly manufactured, fentanyl is added to heroin, disguising it as highly potent heroin, so users don’t realize that the heroin they’re purchasing may contain fentanyl. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was originally developed as an analgesic – or painkiller – for surgery. It has a specific chemical structure with multiple areas that can be modified, often illicitly, to form related compounds with marked differences in potency. Tyrannical Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Act and Propaganda Administration https://rumble.com/v2fpmoy-tyrannical-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court-act-and-propaganda-admin.html Secret Courts History of Intrigue and Abuse and over 800s of million dollars in pay off to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Judges so far. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which approved the National Security Agency's collection of U.S. citizens' telephone records, is just one of history's many secret courts. The fundamental premise behind secret courts like the FISC is that some decisions cannot be made in public without jeopardizing a critical national interest, such as security, defense or government administration. CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html In 1990, a failed CIA anti-drug operation in Venezuela resulted in at least 18 ton of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and sold on the streets. The incident, which was first made public in 1993, was part of a plan to assist an undercover agent to gain the confidence of a Colombian drug cartel. How the CIA Turned Us onto LSD and Heroin Secrets of America's False War on Drugs. Through in-depth interviews with academic researchers, historians, journalists, former federal agents, and drug dealers, America's Fake War on Drugs tells true tales of how, for instance, the CIA and Department of Defense helped to introduce LSD to Americans in the 1950s. "The CIA literally sent over two guys to Sandoz Laboratories where LSD had first been synthesized and bought up the world's supply of LSD and brought it back," Lappé tells Nick Gillespie in a wide-ranging conversation about the longest war the U.S. government has fought. "With that supply they began a [secret mind-control] program called MK Ultra which had all sorts of other drugs involved." Drug Enforcement Administration - Will Kill You - This Man Is Lucky - Most Time Dead https://rumble.com/v2ffnam-drug-enforcement-administration-will-kill-you-this-man-is-lucky-most-time-d.html Stephen Lara did everything right. But, as you know well, most of the time DEA or FBI or CIA or DOJ or A COP Will Kill You With Bullet To Your Head and Drive Off With Your Money. Yes even innocent people aren’t safe from U.S. Civil Forfeiture. Asset forfeiture laws is a tool in our country’s a tyrannical u.s.a. government battle against its own people and u.s.a. citizens to steal all your money and kill you, drug abuse and drug crimes, helping to shut down “pill mills” and stop rogue doctors, pharmacists, and dealers. Thousand's Dead In U.S.A. Now & Shot In Head By Police & Civil Asset Forfeiture Abuse https://rumble.com/v2fjx2g-thousands-dead-in-u.s.a.-now-and-shot-in-head-by-police-and-civil-asset-for.html New Proof That Police Use Civil Forfeiture To Take From Those Who Can’t Fight Back Nassir Geiger spoke with the wrong person at the wrong time and it cost him hundreds of dollars and his car. Nassir was a victim of Philadelphia’s predatory civil forfeiture scheme that operated from a shady “courtroom” at City Hall. For years, police and prosecutors seized cash, cars and even homes and then took the property for themselves. Worse still, new data show that the police preyed on people in minority and low-income areas—in other words, people who could least afford to fight back. Why Is A Tyrannical U.S.A. Government Helping Mass Shootings Deadliest Gun Killings https://rumble.com/v2fc062-why-is-a-tyrannical-u.s.a.-government-helping-mass-shootings-deadliest-gun-.html No matter how strict you make gun laws sick people and drug out persons or normal people and others etc. (all races and all colours of people) a criminal is a criminal and will always be a criminal and a criminal with a gun or without a gun, will always break the law. I don’t believe the lies they are trying to feed you they don’t work. On average in the United States, more than 110 people are killed from guns and more than 200 are shot and wounded each day. Additionally, 19 mass shootings take place in the U.S. each year from 2009 to 2020, with 947 wounded by gunfire and 1,363 fatally shot. In this video, we're going to take a look at the The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” History of Deadliest Prison and Street Gangs United States and Your Gun Right Laws https://rumble.com/v2etrk0-history-of-deadliest-prison-and-street-gangs-united-states-and-your-gun-rig.html No matter how strict you make gun laws a criminal will always be a criminal and a criminal with a gun or without a gun, will always break the law. I don’t believe the lies they are trying to feed you they don’t work. In this video, we're going to take a look at the history of gangs and the deadliest street gangs in the world. We'll explore the role gangs have played in different parts of history, and we'll look at some of the most notorious prison gangs in the world. Outrageous Police Killing's Misconduct Police Brutality and Public Trust Is Now Gone! https://rumble.com/v2eeblc-outrageous-police-killings-misconduct-police-brutality-and-public-trust-is-.html You can truly grieve for every officer who has been lost in the line of duty in this country and still be troubled by cases of police overreach. Those two ideas are not mutually exclusive. You can have great regard for law enforcement and still want them to be held to high standards. This is a compilation video containing 10 incidents involving police officers, which had all been previously reported by various media outlets. This video is not created to elicit negative views towards the police in general. The purpose of this compilation is purely informative. This video does not contain any paid promotion and it is not monetized in any way. We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights https://rumble.com/v2d7y7w-we-the-sheeple-people-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-a-real-bill-of-st.html The Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. As passed by the Congress: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. U.S. Supreme Court: District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), “Right to bear Arms” is “clearly an individual right, having nothing whatsoever to do with service in the militia” and that it is a “Right” not to be disarmed by the Government and was not the granting of a new ‘right to have arms’. “The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting….It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” State Militia’s are completely separate from the Citizen’s Inherent Right ‘to bear Arms’. The “Right to bear Arms” is not a State Issue, it’s a Federal Issue. No State Law can override the Federal United States Constitution. 76 Million Gun Owners, Gun Culture, and 2nd Amendment Laws, Red Flags, U.S. Gangs https://rumble.com/v2cuu12-76-million-gun-owners-gun-culture-and-2nd-amendment-laws-red-flags-u.s.-gan.html Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. What is Martial law in the US ? Habeas corpus ? Insurrection Act of 1807 ? NWO ? https://rumble.com/v2cfl0c-what-is-martial-law-in-the-us-habeas-corpus-insurrection-act-of-1807-nwo-.html The martial law concept in the United States is closely tied to the right of habeas corpus, which is, in essence, the right to a hearing and trial on lawful imprisonment, or more broadly, the supervision of law enforcement by the judiciary. The ability to suspend habeas corpus is related to the imposition of martial law. Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" There have been many instances of the use of the military within the borders of the United States, such as during the Whiskey Rebellion and in the South during the Civil Rights Movement, but those acts are not tantamount to a declaration of martial law. Deployment of troops does not necessarily mean that the civil courts cannot function, which is one of the keys, as the US Supreme Court noted, to martial law. In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions that were handed down between the American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids US military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. Federal Emergency Management Agency Death Camp's Purchase 30,000 Guillotines https://rumble.com/v2cfd3c-federal-emergency-management-agency-death-camps-purchase-30000-guillotines.html Executive Orders associated with FEMADC that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Why Did the U.S. Government Recently Purchase 30,000 Guillotines? The use of guillotines for “governmental purposes” was lobbied for and passed in the U.S. Congress The information we received is that 15,000 are currently stored in Georgia and 15,000 in Montana Are the beheadings by Muslim's and Others today meant to desensitize us against U.S. Government beheadings in the future? Rex 84 FEMADC’s Blueprint for Martial Law in America and A Police State America. https://rumble.com/v2cf4yu-rex-84-femadcs-blueprint-for-martial-law-in-america-and-a-police-state-amer.html F.E.M.A.D.C. (Federal Emergency Management Agency Death Camp's) is a cover for a secret "continuity of government" plan in case the American people ever rebelled, that was exposed publicly by Congressman Jack Brooks. It is designed to give all control of government and states over to the president and FEMADC, suspend the constitution. Readiness Exercise 1984 (Rex 84) was an armed forces exercise conducted on behalf of the United States federal government to test our military's ability to detain large numbers of American citizens in case of civil unrest or national emergency. The military exercise anticipated civil disturbances, major demonstrations and strikes that would affect continuity of government. United States Military and American Genocide A Brutal and Savage Massacre History https://rumble.com/v2bsonc-united-states-military-and-american-genocide-a-brutal-and-savage-massacre-h.html As a teen, I talked to my American great great grandfather as he shared good history and bad horrifying stories of 2 great wars and other small war and old massacre of his family and friends and other with story of genocide etc. Within the past years, I have stood amidst human remains in the killing fields of Cambodia, at a mass grave where hundreds of thousands are buried all over the world, at memorials in Germany and Poland to the millions killed in the Holocaust, and in the streets of new world order where the scars of ethnic cleansing remain. At each of these sites, I asked myself, “What were the conditions that led to these horrific moments in human world history ?” New World Order Plan To Control Secret Evidence Revealed Death UN 21 Agenda U.S.A. https://rumble.com/v2bivd0-new-world-order-plan-to-control-secret-evidence-revealed-death-un-21-agenda.html Speaker Pelosi's said her laptop had over 18,000+ documents and over 368,000+ pages of emails that were uploaded to who? or hacked by who? before shy got back to her office during the Jan. 6 insurrection. Riley June Williams, 22 was found guilty of six federal counts in November of 2022. Democrats woman of house wearing all white at state of the new world order speech rather than Republicans with red shoe lace who are the true saviors of the new world order and other civil liberties. A laptop stolen from the offices of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during the U.S. Capitol attack has not been recovered from the home or car of a Pennsylvania woman accused of helping steal it, the woman’s lawyer said Tuesday. Yes its still missing or sold to who ? Your Right to Remain Silent A New Answer to an Old Question - Do Not Talk ? O.K. https://rumble.com/v297voe-your-right-to-remain-silent-a-new-answer-to-an-old-question-do-not-talk-o.k.html Don't Talk to the Police Ever! Fifth Amendment "Right To Remain Silent," When a witness is summoned to testify before a grand jury or at a judicial or legislative proceeding, the lawyer for the witness frequently concludes that it may be in the client's best interest to assert the Fifth Amendment "right to remain silent," at least with respect to certain topics. The lawyer will often give the witness a card to read aloud when asserting that privilege. But precisely what words should the lawyer advise the client to read when invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege? For more than 100 years, lawyers have shown surprisingly little imagination or ingenuity, advising their clients to state in almost exactly these words: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer on the grounds that it may tend to incriminate me." This article explains why that unfortunate language is never in the best interests of the witness, and why it naturally tends to sound to most listeners as if the witness is somehow admitting that he cannot tell the truth without confessing that he is guilty of some crime. The article also points out that this archaic invocation is not required by either the language or the theory of the Fifth Amendment, nor by the most recent controlling Supreme Court precedents. The article concludes with a suggestion for an entirely new formulation for invoking the privilege, one which gives greater protection to the rights of the witness and also more faithfully captures what the Supreme Court of the United States has written about the nature of this precious constitutional privilege. Keywords: Fifth Amendment, self incrimination, right to remain silent Your Right to Remain Silent A New Answer to an Old Question - Do Not Talk ? O.K. Don't Talk to the Police Ever! Fifth Amendment "Right To Remain Silent," When a witness is summoned to testify before a grand jury or at a judicial or legislative proceeding, the lawyer for the witness frequently concludes that it may be in the client's best interest to assert the Fifth Amendment "right to remain silent," at least with respect to certain topics. The lawyer will often give the witness a card to read aloud when asserting that privilege. But precisely what words should the lawyer advise the client to read when invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege? For more than 100 years, lawyers have shown surprisingly little imagination or ingenuity, advising their clients to state in almost exactly these words: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer on the grounds that it may tend to incriminate me." This article explains why that unfortunate language is never in the best interests of the witness, and why it naturally tends to sound to most listeners as if the witness is somehow admitting that he cannot tell the truth without confessing that he is guilty of some crime. The article also points out that this archaic invocation is not required by either the language or the theory of the Fifth Amendment, nor by the most recent controlling Supreme Court precedents. The article concludes with a suggestion for an entirely new formulation for invoking the privilege, one which gives greater protection to the rights of the witness and also more faithfully captures what the Supreme Court of the United States has written about the nature of this precious constitutional privilege. Keywords: Fifth Amendment, self-incrimination, right to remain silent. Why You Should NEVER Talk to the Police. Period. “The police are at my door. They want to talk to me. They told me I am not a suspect. I did absolutely nothing wrong. I have nothing to worry about. They can’t arrest me or do any harm to me if I did nothing wrong, right?” Wrong. “But I committed no crime. Took nobody’s life. I didn’t even see anything criminal happen. I don’t know anyone who may have been there. I was 173 miles away when it happened. I don’t know any of the facts except from what others told me. I cannot possible be harmed, right?!” Again, I am sorry to tell you, but you’re wrong. What people do not realize is what they don’t know actually can hurt them. If you don’t believe me, listen to the words of former United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, “[A]ny lawyer worth his [or her] salt will tell the [client] in no uncertain terms to make no statement to the police under any circumstances.” Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949) (emphasis added). Let us look at the situation a little more closely. If the police ever ask you to come in to the station “just to chat” or are stopping by “because they only have a couple questions for you” — that means one of two things: You are a suspect; You are a possible suspect. Does that clear the picture up? I sure hope so. There is absolutely no reason for the police to want to have any discussion with you unless they know something that you (probably) don’t. May be your name was mentioned during a discussion with another potential suspect, or perhaps someone is trying to frame you, or, worse yet, you look like the person who was present on the scene and an eyewitness made a mistake in identity. This kind of thing happens all the time. And innocent people end up in custody as a result. There is no reason to talk to the police especially if you’re innocent. There is no reason to talk to the police; especially if you’re innocent. Here are the top ten reasons why you should not talk to the police:* REASON #1: Talking to the police CANNOT and WILL NOT help you. Talking to the police cannot make any difference. Nobody can “talk their way out of” an arrest. No matter how “savvy” or intelligent you think you might be, you will not convince them that you are innocent. And any ‘good’ statements that may help you that you tell the police cannot be introduced into evidence because of hearsay rules. It’s a lose-lose situation; don’t talk to the police. REASON #2: Even if you’re guilty, and you want to confess and get it off your chest, you still shouldn’t talk to the police. There is plenty of time to confess and admit guilt later. Why rush the inevitable? First, hire an attorney. Let them do their work, and may be you will win your case. It is much harder to win when there is a confession. For example, do you know what happens if the cop cannot be located and there is no confession? The case gets dismissed! (It’s not a universal rule, but it’s more common than you might think.) Don’t talk to the police. REASON #3: Even if you are innocent, it’s easy to tell some little white lie in the course of a statement. When people assert their innocence, they sometimes exaggerate their statements and tell a little white lie on accident. That same lie could be later used to destroy your credibility at trial. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #4: Even if you are innocent, and you only tell the truth, and you don’t tell any little white lies, it is possible to give the police some detail of information that can be used to convict you. If you make any statement — it could later be used against. E.g. “I did not kill the guy. I was not around the area when it happened. I don’t have a gun. I never owned a gun. I never liked the guy, but, hell, who did?” Bingo. We just found your incriminating statement: “I never liked the guy.” Don’t talk to the police. REASON #5: Even if you were innocent, and you only tell the truth, and you don’t tell any little white lies, and you don’t give the police any information that can be used against you to prove motive or opportunity, you still should not talk to the police because the possibility that the police might not recall your statement with 100% accuracy. Nobody has a perfect memory. That includes law enforcement. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #6: Even if you’re innocent, and you only tell the truth, and your entire statement is videotaped so that the police don’t have to rely on their memory, an innocent person can still make some innocent assumption about a fact or state some detail about the case they overheard on the way to the police station, and the police will assume that they only way the suspect could have known that fact or that detail was if he was, in fact, guilty. If you overhear a fact from someone else and later adopt it as your own, it can be used to crucify you at trial. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #7: Even if you’re innocent, and you only tell the truth in your statement, and you give the police no information that can be used against you, and the whole statement is videotaped, a suspect’s answers can still be used against him if the police (through no fault of their own) have any evidence that any of the suspect’s statements are false (even if they are really true). Honest mistakes by witnesses can land you in jail. Why take the risk? Don’t talk to the police. REASON #8: The police do not have authority to make deals or grant a suspect leniency in exchange for getting as statement. Law enforcement personnel do not have authority to make deals, grant you immunity, or negotiate plea agreements. The only entity with that authority is the County or Commonwealth Attorney in state court and the U.S. Attorney in federal court. The officers will tell you they do, but they are lying. They have a carte blanche to lie. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #9: Even if a suspect is guilty, and wants to confess, there may be mitigating factors which justify a lesser charge. You may be accused of committing one offense when, in fact, you are guilty of a lesser offense. By confessing to the higher offense, you are throwing away bargaining chips. The prosecutor can try the case with your confession to the higher offense. There is no reason to confess. Don’t talk to the police. REASON #10: Even for a completely honest and innocent person, it is difficult to tell the same story twice in exactly the same way. If trial is the first time you tell your story, then there is no other statement by you to contradict any of your facts. However, if you have told your story twice, once at trial, and once to the police, you are probably going to mess some facts up. It’s human nature. A good cross examination by a prosecutor will tear you apart. Don’t talk to the police. *Taken from a video lecture by Professor Dwayne. The video is reproduced in full below. https://rumble.com/v297voe-your-right-to-remain-silent-a-new-answer-to-an-old-question-do-not-talk-o.k.html Many years ago, in the then-peaceful suburbs of where we lived on Long Island, NY, my across-the-street neighbor, an older woman, came running to our house in a panic, saying that her house had been robbed! My father — meaning well — impulsively then ran to & and inside her house, to, I guess, see what he could see. In the meantime, my mother called the local police, who showed up at the neighbor’s house minutes later — and promptly ARRESTED MY FATHER. We (my mother and the neighbor, and certainly my father) tried to explain to the police that my father was innocent. But it was only HOURS LATER that the police released (and did not charge) my father. During those few hours — as well as afterward — my mother, my sister, and I and the neighbor, were debating whether we should files charges against the police for a wrongful arrest/detainment of my father — but we ultimately decided against it, and opted for diplomacy — because, as we reasoned, (a) the police may have had what they had thought was a VALID REASON to arrest my father (although they COULD HAVE come over to OUR house to talk to the neighbor — which they did NOT do!), and (b) it would be better to maintain GOOD RELATIONS with the police than have them “hold a grudge” against us.

Following any major gun violence incident in America, a debate is sparked between two fundamentally opposed sides that eventually fades away with little or no significant policy changes. It seems inevitable then that parents will look outside of American borders for safer alternatives. Each time the gun control debate is reignited, the same actors voice the same arguments for and against expanding gun control legislation. While this battle ensues, parents around the country hug their kids a bit tighter, thinking of the children who did not come home from school that day. Each day we inch closer to a reality in which school shootings are taken for granted. Rather than being tragic and extraordinary circumstances, school shootings fall into the same category as a tornado: an unfortunate and periodic occurrence that can only be prepared for, not prevented. The most recent solutions to the problem of school shootings are bullet-proof backpacks and armed teachers. When will parents decide that enough is enough? Parents do have another option for keeping their children safe: they can choose to leave and educate their children elsewhere. It is quite remarkable that this option has yet to enter the public consciousness (though it is not surprising, given that the national response to a mass shooting has solidified into a routine). There are plenty of countries around the world where a school shooting has never taken place. There are even more where it has only happened once or twice. America is the only place where school shootings happen on regular basis. Will American parents make the decision to leave their homeland in order to secure a safer life for their children? The answer short answer is probably not. Embedded into the American psyche is that the nation is a “Land of Immigrants”: for generations people from all corners of the globe have immigrated to America in search of the American Dream. Rarely do people leave. So secure are American citizens within their borders that less than half have valid passports, most of which are used for travel to Canada and Mexico. Inherent in the national psyche is that Americans are living their best life. Many people will acknowledge that other countries may do particular things better or more efficiently than they are done in America (healthcare, gun control, infrastructure, finance, etc.), but that nowhere does everything better. This attitude, combined with a national narrative of suffering and sacrifice borne by millions of immigrants who left everything behind in search of a better life virtually guarantees an unwillingness to leave, no matter how hard things get. Nevertheless, let us explore what a new wave of gun safety migration might look like for safe haven states like Australia. The policies Australia created following the Port Arthur massacre in 1996 frequently appear as evidence for both sides of the gun control debate. For those looking to limit public access to weapons, Australia is touted as a success story, in which law-abiding citizens were willing to give up their weapons following a national tragedy. On the other hand, this state-mandated intrusion on personal freedom is precisely the danger that gun advocates warn against (never mind that Australia’s policies have actually worked). Sadly, Australia has little voice in the matter; Malcolm Turnbull declined the invitation to advise President Trump on gun control at a recent press conference. Meanwhile, countries around the world are tightening immigration requirements and pursuing controversial policies in the name of border protection. Fears include accepting terrorists posing as refugees, overburdened social welfare systems to which migrants do not contribute and dilution of the existing national culture. Those fleeing gun violence are perhaps akin to economic migrants, rather than refugees. This bodes well for assimilation in a new country, but immigration of this sort is nevertheless impeded by policies that are becoming ever stricter. For parents in search of safe schools, the decision to leave America would be deliberate. In this aspect, they are far luckier than emigrants whose choices are forced by immediate financial or social stressors. Those who choose to leave are likely well-off and would not put significant strain on the social welfare system of the accepting nation. Australia is particularly poised to be the gun-free haven of choice for fleeing Americans. The two states share a language, common history and much popular culture, making assimilation easy. An excellent, internationally competitive education system (in which only three people have ever died in school shooting incidents) ensures that parents would not have to sacrifice quality for safety. While it is possible that a small influx of Americans into Australia would create closer ties and build good-will, it is equally likely that immigration in great enough numbers would cause animosity between the two states. Perhaps the idea to leave America will never occur to American parents. Children will continue to be killed, each incident slowly desensitizing parents to the tragedy they may one day face. Or perhaps the recent shooting in Parkland, Florida will be the catalyst for meaningful policy change to occur. As with any sweeping policy transformation in America, there is rarely one single incident that drives change. Rather it is the momentum built up by a series of events that forces the public to confront long-held practices and beliefs. The sooner this happens with gun control, the safer American schoolchildren will be. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Fla. – In the wake of the deadly shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the question on everyone's mind is how to keep students safe. Amid the discussion on gun control, sales of bulletproof backpacks have spiked nationwide. "Schools, churches, people just going to work every day -- now any infrastructure that has people is a target," Ron Weaver, CEO of Eastern Beacon Industries, said. Backpacks, sling bags and laptop bags, weighing as little as 3 pounds are now able to withstand rifle fire, like from the gun used inside the Parkland high school where 17 people died in a mass shooting Feb. 14. Weaver showed his newest products at the Miami-Dade police vendor show Thursday. "You have to take the backpack off and you flip it around and you deploy it. You have two plates," Weaver said. "We're trying to look at the best product we can possibly get for our officers to better serve our community," Miami-Dade police Capt. Mario Knapp said. Knapp said the department has been adding tools for active shooters for four years now. But Weaver, a retired Los Angeles police officer, is seeing a surge in parents wanting his products, which he said offer more protection than most bullet-resistant bags on the market. "They put the 38 protection, which will stop a handgun, but you know, six out of the last 10 active shooters has been rifles," he said. Local 10 News reporter Amy Viteri watched as several shots were fired into one of the bags. No bullet made it through. If you look at the bag, you can see bullet holes in the fabric. But if you take out the plate, the heat of the bullet actually penetrates the plate, which trapped them inside. Weaver calls the bag a defensive tool, regardless of what happens with gun laws. "I think the days of ignoring it are done," he said. "You have to address it. You have to have the training. You have to think of the worst-case scenario." What is the Real Problem with Gun Violence in America? Gun violence is tragic, and all too familiar now. It has become akin to a political battle drill: a sociopathic individual armed with a gun enters a public place where people should be able to go and spend quality time and begins shooting, leaving a body count and a nation mourning yet another indescribable loss…then the wagons begin to circle. And once again, the national debate begins. Sadly, though, it usually does look more like a debate and less like a conversation. It looks even less like problem resolving. Today in America, we need more conversation and less debate. I am going to say something now that will not make me any points with our readership: guns are a part of the problem. Yeah, I said it. I make that statement as a free American gun owner who has guns in his home for self-protection. As a 20-year police veteran who has carried at least one firearm every day for most of his adult life. As a husband and father who has armed his wife for her protection and taught his sons and daughters how to shoot and safely handle firearms. Most importantly, I say this as an American veteran who values his rights under the 2nd Amendment. Now, before you start flaming me and sending nasty emails complaining about me, let me explain my statement. Guns are a part of the problem in these all too common mass shootings, they are not THE problem. The reality is, that the gun is the easiest, most lethal, and most effective way to kill a bunch of people in a short period of time. The average, untrained (or minimally trained) person would not be able to do this much damage with a knife or a bat. It could happen with explosives, but that requires a certain level of knowledge and resources. It is also easier to blow yourself up in your garage bomb lab than it is to shoot yourself. I don’t want to ban guns or repeal the 2nd Amendment. I just want to acknowledge that the gun is a lethal weapon and part of the problem with mass murders in America. It’s a pretty big problem with criminal violence, suicide, and domestic violence also. Mental illness is a problem, too. I don’t have a degree in psychology or psychiatry, but I’m comfortable making this statement: Normally functioning, well-adjusted individuals do not kill multiple people for their own entertainment or political benefit. Unless you are a soldier in a combat zone or defending a life, this is not something you do…even if you play violent video games while watching violent movies and listening to violent music like Marilyn Manson and Ozzie Osbourne. We have a mental illness problem in our country. It is something that we need to address somehow. Racism is not over. Yes, we have a black president. Before that, Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice held the two highest political positions ever held by black people in America. Black and Hispanic people have made incredible strides forward in America. That doesn’t mean life is all flowers and happiness for minorities. Racism still exists. It is undeniable. So, what’s the answer? I don’t know because the answer is complicated. But I know what the answer isn’t. The answer is not to try to cram these myriad and complex issues into a single, easily categorized box that fits your particular political view. The answer is not to dismiss those with differing viewpoints out of hand as racists, idiots, low information voters, gun nuts, hippies, race-baiters, or liberal hippies, although those labels might fit certain people. The answer is not to ignore studies, evidence, or information that does not support your point of view. Nor is the answer to cherry-pick information that supports your point of view to the exclusion of all others. Wouldn’t it be better to look at the information presented to you and find the flaws while acknowledging the truths? Then do the same thing to the data that supports your position. I’m pretty sure they call that thinking….yes; I’m positive that is what it’s called. I don’t the answer, but I think I know how we get to the answer. We get the answer by coming together and trying to solve the problem. I don’t mean come together as hippies, Kumbaya-singing way, but by bringing people (preferably professional people) to the table and trying to find a way to solve this issue. Gun rights advocates, Constitutional scholars, mental health professionals, civil rights leaders, and law enforcement leaders, just to name a few. Then listen to each other. Actually listen. Don’t over each other like a panel on a 24-hour news channel. Don’t just quietly wait until you have a chance to talk. Listen. Hear. Understand. Would this solve the problem? It might. It might not. These are complex issues that require complex solutions. But it would do more for America than what we’re doing now, which is pointing fingers and putting our heads in the sand. 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Most U.S. Citizen Have the Right to Protect Themselves As an Oakland Police Officer, I was of the opinion that Law Abiding Citizens that are properly trained have the right to have guns. As recently as 2010 the City of Chicago had an ordinance banning handguns in your home. The United States Supreme Court disagreed. They ruled, pursuant to the 2nd Amendment, every law-abiding citizen had the right to protect their home by having handguns in his/her home. [Mc Donald v. City of Chicago]. The case is particularly noteworthy for a few reasons. Firstly, it reaffirmed that the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and its relatively simple wording – “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” – still holds true into the modern era. Secondly, it showcased that without constant legal vigilance, the Second Amendment could be dismantled by the efforts of lower courts. The Second Amendment allows law-abiding citizens, no matter where in the country they live, to bear arms. However, each state does have its own specific rules and regulations regarding the right to own, carry, and use firearms. In order to keep the Second Amendment impenetrable from lower court attempts to subvert its power, it is important for all gun owners to get familiarized with the laws of their state and always abide by them. Illegal gun ownership behaviors and actions will only fuel the arguments against the Second Amendment’s importance. The average gun owner in America has the right to: • Own most types of firearms with the correct permits. • Carry a concealed firearm with the right licenses/permits. • Enter a public space with a firearm with appropriate permits. • Use a firearm in self-defense when immediate severe harm or death is imminent if no defensive action is taken. • Hunt. You should always double-check your state’s own gun laws before purchasing, carrying, or using a firearm for the first time. There could be specific nuances in the law that place unusual restrictions on your Second Amendment rights. Even unknowingly violating the law can lead to serious weapons charges that carry heavy penalties, such as incarceration, steep fines, and the removal of gun ownership rights for many years or permanently. The Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms One of the most hotly debated parts of the Constitution, the Second Amendment is a single sentence that leaves a lot open to interpretation. Passed in 1789 along with nine other amendments known as the Bill of Rights, it prevents the government from infringing on “well regulated Militias.” What this means, is up for debate. The Supreme Court released very few groundbreaking opinions on the topic until 2008 when they found the Second Amendment does in fact protect an individual right to bear arms. What the Second Amendment Says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Frequently Asked Questions What was the original intent of the Second Amendment? Many historians agree that the primary reason for passing the Second Amendment was to prevent the need for the United States to have a professional standing army. At the time it was passed, it seems it was not intended to grant a right for private individuals to keep weapons for self-defense. What does the right to bear arms really mean? The right to bear arms generally refers to a person’s right to possess weapons. Over the years, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution’s right to bear arms as an individual self-defense right, making it very difficult for Congress to regulate guns. What is a Second Amendment sanctuary? Second Amendment sanctuaries are cities, towns, and counties that resist state and federal gun laws. They adopt formal resolutions either declaring support for Second Amendment rights or withhold support for the enforcement of gun laws. In most cases, this means the local government will not enforce gun laws they don't agree with - such as bans on bump stocks, assault weapons, and high-capacity magazines. However, many legal experts say sanctuary resolutions have no legal authority, and challenges in the courts are likely to follow. The Second Amendment in Practice United States Library of Congress, The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation For over 200 years, despite extensive debate and much legislative action with respect to regulation of the purchase, possession, and transportation of firearms, as well as proposals to substantially curtail ownership of firearms, there was no definitive resolution by the courts of just what right the Second Amendment protects. The Second Amendment is naturally divided into two parts: its prefatory clause (A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State) and its operative clause (the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed). To perhaps oversimplify the opposing arguments, the states’ rights thesis emphasized the importance of the prefatory clause, arguing that the purpose of the clause was to protect the states in their authority to maintain formal, organized militia units. The individual rights thesis emphasized the operative clause, so that individuals would be protected in the ownership, possession, and transportation of firearms.1 Whatever the Amendment meant, it was seen as a bar only to federal action, not state2 or private3 restraints. One of the Second Amendment cases that the Court has heard, and until recently the only case challenging a congressional enactment, seemed to affirm individual protection but only in the context of the maintenance of a militia or other such public force. In United States v. Miller,4 the Court sustained a statute requiring registration under the National Firearms Act of sawed-off shotguns. After reciting the original provisions of the Constitution dealing with the militia, the Court observed that [w]ith obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpreted with that end in view.5 The significance of the militia, the Court continued, was that it was composed of civilians primarily, soldiers on occasion. It was upon this force that the states could rely for defense and securing of the laws, on a force that comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense, who, when called for service . . . were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time.6 Therefore, [i]n the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than 18 inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument. Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.7 After that decision, Congress placed greater limitations on the receipt, possession, and transportation of firearms,8 and proposals for national registration or prohibition of firearms altogether have been made.9 Miller, however, shed little light on the validity of such proposals. Pointing out that interest in the character of the Second Amendment right has recently burgeoned, Justice Thomas, concurring in the Court’s invalidation (on other grounds) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, questioned whether the Second Amendment bars federal regulation of gun sales, and suggested that the Court might determine at some future date . . . whether Justice Story was correct . . . that the right to bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic.’10 It was not until 2008 that the Supreme Court definitively came down on the side of an individual rights theory. Relying on new scholarship regarding the origins of the Amendment,11 the Court in District of Columbia v. Heller12 confirmed what had been a growing consensus of legal scholars—that the rights of the Second Amendment adhered to individuals. The Court reached this conclusion after a textual analysis of the Amendment,13 an examination of the historical use of prefatory phrases in statutes, and a detailed exploration of the 18th century meaning of phrases found in the Amendment. Although accepting that the historical and contemporaneous use of the phrase keep and bear Arms often arose in connection with military activities, the Court noted that its use was not limited to those contexts.14 Further, the Court found that the phrase “well regulated Militia” referred not to formally organized state or federal militias, but to the pool of able-bodied men who were available for conscription.15 Finally, the Court reviewed contemporaneous state constitutions, post-enactment commentary, and subsequent case law to conclude that the purpose of the right to keep and bear arms extended beyond the context of militia service to include self-defense. Using this individual rights theory, the Court struck down a District of Columbia law that banned virtually all handguns and required that any other type of firearm in a home be dissembled or bound by a trigger lock at all times. The Court rejected the argument that handguns could be banned as long as other guns (such as long-guns) were available, noting that, for a variety of reasons, handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home.16 Similarly, the requirement that all firearms be rendered inoperable at all times was found to limit the core lawful purpose of self-defense.17 However, the Court specifically stated (albeit in dicta) that the Second Amendment did not limit prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, penalties for carrying firearms in schools and government buildings, or laws regulating the sales of guns.18 The Court also noted that there was a historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons that would not be affected by its decision.19 The Court, however, declined to establish the standard by which future gun regulations would be evaluated.20 And, more importantly, because the District of Columbia is a federal enclave, the Court did not have occasion to address whether it would reconsider its prior decisions that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. The latter issue was addressed in McDonald v. Chicago,21 where a plurality of the Court, overturning prior precedent, found that the Second Amendment is incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment and is thus enforceable against the states.22 Relevant to this question, the Court examined whether the right to keep and bear arms is fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty23 or deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition.24 The Court, relying on historical analysis set forth previously in Heller, noted the English common law roots of the right to keep arms for self-defense25 and the importance of the right to the American colonies, the drafters of the Constitution, and the states as a bulwark against over-reaching federal authority.26 Noting that by the 1850s the perceived threat that the National Government would disarm the citizens had largely faded, the Court suggested that the right to keep and bear arms became valued principally for purposes of self-defense, so that the passage of Fourteenth Amendment, in part, was intended to protect the right of ex-slaves to keep and bear arms. While it was argued by the dissent that this protection would most logically be provided by the Equal Protection Clause, not by the Due Process Clause,27 the plurality also found enough evidence of then-existent concerns regarding the treatment of black citizens by the state militia to conclude that the right to bear arms was also intended to protect against generally-applicable state regulation. The Supreme Court's Blockbuster Second Amendment Ruling: What the Court Resolved and What it Left Open Before adjourning for the summer yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled, 5-4, that the Second Amendment protects a personal right to possess firearms for, among other purposes, self-defense. Accordingly, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court invalidated a D.C. law that bans private handgun possession and requires long guns (rifles and shotguns) to be stored either disassembled or under trigger lock. The majority opinion by Justice Scalia—joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito—expressed no doubt that the Second Amendment was originally understood to recognize a personal right (that is, not simply a right to use a gun while part of a militia). The opinion finds nothing but confirmation of that reading in the post-enactment history of the Amendment, at least until recent decades. Indeed, Justice Scalia uses variants on the word “clear” over a dozen times to describe the language or public understandings of the Second Amendment. Meanwhile, in dissent, Justice Stevens—joined by Justices Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer—also thought the meaning of the Second Amendment was clear, although they thought it clearly did not protect the possession or use of firearms outside the context of military service. It is thus likely that both the majority and dissent are wrong, at least in one sense: If the Supreme Court divides 5-4, then whatever else one says about the answer to the question it resolved, one can hardly say it was clear. Equally unclear are the consequences of the decision. In response to a separate dissent by Justice Breyer, Justice Scalia acknowledged that his opinion left unresolved important questions about the circumstances under which the Second Amendment permits firearms restrictions. Indeed, Justice Scalia practically invited new litigation over the scope of the Second Amendment. After questioning a key premise of Justice Scalia’s opinion, this column addresses two questions left open by the Heller decision: first, its applicability to states and localities; and second, its applicability to handgun possession outside the home. How the Majority Read the Second Amendment The Second Amendment provides: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Much of the debate over the meaning of the Amendment has centered on the relation between the prefatory language about the militia and the substantive provision concerning the right to keep and bear arms. In his majority opinion, Justice Scalia contended that the substantive language most naturally protects a personal right to possess and carry weapons, and that the prefatory language, properly understood, reinforces that conclusion. The Framers, he said, were worried that the federal government might disarm the population, and so they protected the unorganized militia—a term referring, at the time, to able-bodied adult white men—by protecting a right to private possession and ownership of firearms. Although the purpose recited by the Second Amendment had to do with resisting federal encroachments on the militia, Scalia reasoned, the substance of the right was broader, and remains so. Justice Scalia’s analysis of the relation between the two clauses of the Second Amendment is fundamentally originalist. He wants to know how the relation between the prefatory language and the keep-and-bear-arms language would have been understood by Americans in 1791. Although he does discuss the views of Americans later, in the Nineteenth Century, he does so primarily to show that the original understanding (as he perceives it) did not change. In a striking passage, Justice Scalia admits that his reading of the Second Amendment may make little sense today. “Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security, and where gun violence is a serious problem,” Justice Scalia acknowledges. He continues: “That is perhaps debatable, but what is not debatable is that it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.” Can Constitutional Provisions Become Obsolete? But why not? Doctors at the time of the Founding believed that bleeding patients was an efficacious treatment for many ailments. Suppose that they had managed to insert into the Constitution the following provision: “The purging of ill humours, being necessary to the health of the human body, the right of the people to be bled by physicians, shall not be infringed.” Today we know that infectious disease is caused by micro-organisms, rather than by an imbalance of humours, and also that, with some notable exceptions, bleeding is generally quite harmful. Would we really want to say that a medical quack has a constitutional right to insist on bleeding her patients? Indeed, we need not even struggle to concoct hypothetical cases. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution empowers Congress to “coin money” and “regulate the value thereof,” but does not authorize the printing of money not backed by precious metal, and the Constitution expressly denies that power to the states. One reading of the Constitution thus would make U.S. currency—which is not convertible into gold—invalid. However, in the late Nineteenth Century, in the Legal Tender Cases, the Court upheld the government’s issuance of paper money. The Court said that the grant to Congress of the power to coin money did not negate an implied power to print paper money, which could be seen as necessary and proper to implementing other expressly granted powers. That is a legitimate argument—in much the same way that the arguments offered by the dissent for a military-focused reading of the Second Amendment are legitimate—but in both circumstances, one senses that something else is driving the conclusion: In the Legal Tender Cases, the majority understood that while the Founders may have thought that the power to print paper money could only lead to runaway inflation, a modern economy can benefit enormously from the government’s responsible exercise of the power to expand the money supply. Likewise, the dissenters in Heller understood that widely available handguns could lead to havoc. Justice Scalia is technically right: The Court lacks the power to declare a constitutional provision extinct. It does, however, have the power to construe a constitutional provision sensibly in light of modern circumstances. That is exactly what the Court did in the Legal Tender Cases, and what the dissenters believed they were doing in Heller. If Justice Scalia and the other Justices in the majority thought otherwise because they believe that widely available handguns make people safer—a view taken by gun rights groups—then they should have said so forthrightly. What About the States? The District of Columbia argued to the Court in Heller that even if the Second Amendment protects a personal right of armed self-defense, that right can have no application in the District because, as a federal territory, there is no state militia to be protected there. Because the Court rejected the notion that the militia clause of the Second Amendment limits the substantive clause, it dismissed this argument entirely. The Court did, however, leave open the question of whether the Second Amendment applies against the states or only against the federal government. As I discussed in an earlier column on the Heller case, two Nineteenth Century cases held that the Second Amendment does not limit the States, but those cases preceded the modern doctrine applying other provisions of the Bill of Rights against the States under the Fourteenth Amendment. In Justice Scalia’s Heller opinion, he discusses the Nineteenth Century cases—United States v. Cruikshank and Presser v. Illinois—but only for the purpose of arguing that these decisions are consistent with reading the Second Amendment as protecting a private right of armed self-defense. He does not say whether they continue to bar application of the Second Amendment to the States. Consequently, states and municipalities that have enacted very restrictive gun laws will likely now face challenges under the Second Amendment. The lower courts will be required to reject these challenges, because the Supreme Court has said that only it can officially overrule its prior precedents; even if a lower court is confident the Court is poised to overrule a precedent, that court must still follow the precedent in the case before it, and then let that case or another like it make its way to the high Court so the overruling can occur. Here, when one of these cases eventually reaches the Supreme Court, it seems likely that the members of the Heller majority would indeed hold that Cruikshank and Presser have been superseded by Heller. The test the Court applies for determining whether a provision of the Bill of Rights applies against the States via the Fourteenth Amendment has been framed in a variety of ways. In the 1968 case of Duncan v. Louisiana¸ the Court recited the various formulations of the test with respect to rights protected by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, and then summarized the incorporation issue as turning on whether a procedural protection “is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.” Translating that test into the Second Amendment context, the incorporation question would be whether a right to possess and carry firearms for personal use is fundamental to the American scheme of liberty. Given the Heller majority’s understanding of the relevant history, the answer would likely be yes. What About Carrying Guns Outside the Home? In his majority opinion, Justice Scalia went out of his way to state that the Second Amendment right of armed self-defense is not absolute. He provided what he himself termed a non-exhaustive list of permissible regulations: restriction on firearms possession by felons and the mentally ill; restrictions on possession in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings; and conditions on sales. He also indicated that the government may ban categories of weapons, such as machine guns, that are not “in common use,” and suggested that licensing laws may be permissible. The Heller majority opinion summarized its holding in this way: “the District's ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.” Although this statement of the case’s holding twice refers to the “home,” tellingly, the District laws challenged in the Heller case are not limited to the home. Thus, the opinion leaves open the question of whether a law like the District’s could be applied to those private citizens who seek to carry guns in public. Justice Scalia’s majority opinion favorably cites cases upholding laws that prohibited carrying a concealed weapon, but does not say whether a state or municipality could ban the carrying of handguns altogether. That issue could well be presented by, for example, a challenge to New York City’s law, which requires a license to carry a handgun. A visitor from New Jersey who brings his handgun into New York City thereby violates the law. Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association has already expressed interest in challenging gun-possession restrictions in Chicago and San Francisco. Do state and local laws forbidding the carrying of guns violate the Second Amendment? The Heller opinion does not say, but its logic implies a right to carry handguns in public. The majority interprets “bear arms” to mean “carry a weapon,” and nothing in the text of the Second Amendment as thus construed suggests that the right would be limited to the home. The Policy Issue Whether it is wise policy to permit law-abiding citizens to possess handguns in their homes or elsewhere is a hotly contested question. Gun control advocates point to statistics showing that guns make the people who possess them less, rather than more, safe. Gun rights groups point to data that, they say, prove the efficacy of armed self-defense. Our usual method for resolving policy questions based on empirical disagreement is robust debate followed by legislative action. And it is clear from the relatively weak gun control laws in the United States that, in most jurisdictions, the people have concluded that guns should be legal. There are exceptions, however -- notably including some of the urban areas that have experienced the worst gun violence in recent years. Yesterday’s decision may have the eventual consequence of removing strict gun control laws from the list of options available to local elected officials. If so, and if the gun control advocates turn out to have the better of the empirical argument, then the Court’s decision in Heller “will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.” Those are not my words. That is what Justice Scalia had to say in dissent earlier this month in Boumediene v. Bush. He then added that sacrificing American lives “would be tolerable if necessary to preserve a time-honored legal principle vital to our constitutional Republic.” No doubt Justice Scalia believes that a personal right to armed self-defense is such a principle, but then, the majority in Boumediene thought that the availability of habeas corpus is also a time-honored legal principle. McDonald v. City of Chicago Case Summary In 2010, the Supreme Court was asked to determine the scope of gun rights for individuals under the Second Amendment. They found that an individual's Second Amendment rights are enforceable against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. In other words, they determined that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" applied to individuals and not just citizen militias. Most importantly, the court concluded that these protections were enforceable against state governments, not just the federal government. Background of McDonald v. City of Chicago In 1982, the city of Chicago passed a law that banned new handgun registrations and required all firearms to be registered. The law effectively barred most private citizens from owning handguns. It stood for nearly thirty years until a new Supreme Court finding opened the door for a challenge. Essentially, the decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago would not have happened without District of Columbia v. Heller. When deciding District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008, the Supreme Court found that the Second Amendment protected individuals' right to possess and carry weapons. Specifically, the court's decision established that: "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." The Heller decision struck down a District of Columbia law prohibiting residents from possessing firearms, including handguns, in their homes. Anticipating this result, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed their lawsuit the same day the Heller decision was announced. They alleged that Chicago's firearm law violated this individual right to bear arms. The named plaintiff, Otis McDonald, was a 76-year-old Oak Park resident and retired maintenance engineer. He was an experienced hunter and legally owned several hunting rifles, but he felt growing concerns about safety in his neighborhood warranted owning a handgun. However, doing so was illegal under Chicago's gun ordinance. The federal district court rejected McDonald's claims that the ban was unconstitutional, noting that prior Supreme Court cases had explicitly refrained from deciding whether the Second Amendment applied to the states. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision, relying on three 19th-century cases that interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment's privileges and immunities clause. The Supreme Court had already decided in Heller that the federal government could not infringe on an individual's right to keep and bear arms. So the crucial question in McDonald v. Chicago was: Does the Second Amendment apply to state and local governments? The Majority Opinion The McDonald decision was a close one, with a 5-4 majority. Justice Samuel Alito, Jr. wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas wrote their own concurring opinions. In previous cases, the Supreme Court declined to extend Second Amendment protections to the states. However, the majority in McDonald v. Chicago concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. This line of reasoning relies on the legal doctrine of "selective incorporation," discussed below. Interestingly, the court had to reject the plaintiff's central argument - that an individual's right to bear arms is essential to a civilized legal system - because prior Supreme Court cases reached the opposite conclusion. Instead, Justice Alito reasoned that the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause prohibits states from infringing on protections from the Bill of Rights, including the right to bear arms. The right of individuals to keep and bear arms for self-defense, the majority reasoned, was essential to the American "scheme of ordered liberty and system of justice." Therefore, Chicago's handgun ban was unconstitutional. "The right to bear arms must be regarded as a substantive guarantee," Justice Alito wrote, "not a prohibition that could be ignored so long as the States legislated in an evenhanded manner." However, the Supreme Court acknowledged in Heller that an individual's right to bear arms has its limits. It doesn't necessarily give someone the right to keep and carry any weapon they choose for any purpose. It was easy for the majority to rationalize an individual owning a handgun for self-defense, but they conceded that certain individuals should not own firearms. States can also still limit where guns can be carried. Bans on weapons in schools and government buildings, for example, are allowed. What Is Selective Incorporation? The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, also known as the Bill of Rights, originally only applied to the federal government. Selective incorporation is a legal doctrine the Supreme Court has used to apply those protections to state governments. They do this using the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Supreme Court uses selective incorporation to apply certain constitutional protections to the states rather than whole amendments. At this point, selective incorporation has been used to extend nearly the entire Bill of Rights to actions by state governments. Dissents Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and John Paul Stevens dissented. Justices Breyer and Stevens wrote separate opinions to outline their arguments against the majority's decision. In his dissent, Justice Breyer argued that historical analysis in Heller was flawed, saying that it was unclear whether the writers of the Constitution intended for there to be a "private armed self-defense right." Instead, he proposed that the Supreme Court should consider the broader goals of the Constitution, such as: Fostering equal respect for individuals Maintaining a democratic form of government Creating well-functioning institutions based on the separation of powers Justice Breyer concluded, and Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor agreed that the states would not have to recognize an individual right to bear arms under this framework. Justice John Paul Stevens filed his own dissent on his very last day as a Supreme Court justice, arguing that the majority misunderstood the scope and purpose of the standards used in previous cases. Using a strictly historical approach to determine whether the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated gun rights, in his view, was untenable. "The question we should be answering," he wrote, "is whether the Constitution guarantees individuals a fundamental right, enforceable against the States, to possess a functional, personal firearm, including a handgun, within the home." This would be a much harder question to answer. But according to Justice Stevens, the problem of whether the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment had been resolved in the 19th century. The way he saw it, the majority was overturning 137 years of precedent by deciding that the privileges and immunities clause included protecting gun rights from infringement by state governments. Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. As passed by the Congress: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. U.S. Supreme Court: District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), “Right to bear Arms” is “clearly an individual right, having nothing whatsoever to do with service in the militia” and that it is a “Right” not to be disarmed by the Government and was not the granting of a new ‘right to have arms’. “The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting….It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” State Militia’s are completely separate from the Citizen’s Inherent Right ‘to bear Arms’. The “Right to bear Arms” is not a State Issue, it’s a Federal Issue. No State Law can override the Federal United States Constitution. The Preamble to The Bill of Rights Congress of the United States. Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution. Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the “Bill of Rights.” – Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. – Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. – Amendment III No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. – Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. – Amendment V No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. – Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. – Amendment VII In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. – Amendment VIII Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. – Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. – Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. AMENDMENT XVI Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratified February 3, 1913. Note: Article I, section 9, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 16. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. The Government does this Gun Control bit every year since 2009. And every year at least 10 million new guns are added to the 350 million we already have. At the N.W.O. we don’t get it. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The first semi-automatic rifle was introduced in 1885, the first semi-automatic pistol in 1892, and the first semi-automatic shotgun in 1902. Semi-automatics account for about 20 percent of the 300 million privately-owned firearms in the United States and the percentage is quickly rising, because semi-automatics now account for about 50 percent of all new firearms bought annually. A semi-automatic rifle or semi-automatic pistol is an autoloading rifle or semi-automatic pistol that fires a single cartridge with each pull of the trigger, and uses part of the fired cartridge's energy to eject the case and load another cartridge into the chamber. For comparison, a single shot, derringer pistol and a bolt-action rifle requires the user to cycle the bolt manually before they can fire a second time, and a fully automatic rifle or pistol fires continuously until the trigger is released. This is called a Fully Automatic Sub Machine Guns. What’s the Difference ? Machine Gun vs. Submachine Gun... Submachine guns use handgun ammunition. Machine guns use rifle ammunition. If a gun-toting character pulls the trigger and holds it there while the business end goes bang-bang-bang, then there's an excellent chance that firearm is a submachine gun or a machine gun. So AR-15 and AK-47 Etc. Are Not Assault Weapon At ALL... Yes I Repeat Are Not Assault Weapon... So AR-15 and AK-47 & Other Guns Are and Fire Semi-Automatic Only The Same For 140 Years! Here’s a quick cheat sheet to avoid some easy pitfalls with this terminology. AR-15: Nope, the AR-15 isn’t a submachine gun or a machine gun. It’s not even an assault rifle. Read more about AR-15s here. Assault Rifle: Many, but not all, machine guns (not submachine guns) are assault rifles. If it meets the criteria in this post, then you’re good to go. Assault Weapon: Don’t use this term. At best, it’s vague. At worst, it introduces something politically loaded for no good reason. Read up on assault weapons in this post. Fully Automatic Pistol/Fully Automatic Handgun/Fully Automatic Rifle: Even though they’re technically correct, I’ve not heard of “fully automatic pistol” or “fully automatic handgun” being used all that often. “Submachine gun” or “machine pistol” are the better bets. “Fully automatic rifle,” on the other hand, is a solid substitute for “machine gun.” Machine Rifle: It’s tempting to use this term given machine guns use rifle ammunition, but writing in a “machine rifle” will probably win you a doofus award. Don’t be a doofus. Just write “machine gun.” Referring to a “Submachine Gun” as a “Machine Gun” Upon Second Reference: I think this works. If a character is using a submachine gun on the first reference, and you call it a “machine gun” on the second reference as an abbreviated form, that’s kosher. Just don’t call it a corn dog. It’s not a corn dog. Sub-Machine Gun vs. Submachine Gun: Pick one style and stick with it. I think “sub-machine gun” looks funky, and not in the good way like when I dance at wedding receptions. “Submachine gun” is the better of the two. Submachine Pistol: Even though they fire handgun ammunition, substituting in “submachine pistol” for “submachine gun” is just too weird for this planet (and your fiction). However, “machine pistol” is a thing, and is covered a little later in this post. Tactical Rifle: A good, but probably not great, catch-all for any military-esque, shouldered firearm. If you’re going for a generic depiction, pick submachine gun or machine gun and stick to it. Synonym for Gun A weapon is anything that is designed to, or is used to, cause damage to a person or animal. Gun is a category of weapons that have barrels and accelerate a projectile of some kind with an explosive. Also called firearms. Some weapons with similar forms are also called guns even though they do not use an explosive or a projectile. Yes Tyrannical Government Gun Control Is The U.S.A. Now ? See and Read About Operation Fast and Furious, the largest gunwalking probe, the ATF monitored the sale of about 122,000+ firearms sold, of which only 710 were recovered as of February 2012. A number of straw purchasers have been arrested and indicted; however, as of October 2022 over 10,000 people dead so far none of the targeted and killed. Yes Right Now Our Tyrannical Government U.S.A. Is Sell Guns To Gangs Right Now. Red Flags Laws and U.S. Gangs... Back Ground Check's - Ha ha ha Really... You Are Being Funny Now, See Video (Fast & Furious) How it went down. https://rumble.com/v28zp34-fast-and-furious-how-it-went-down-about-122000-firearms-sold-over-10000-peo.html The Real Number Now Are Over 1 Million Guns Sold with Out Any Back Ground Check Now as Dec. 31 2022 by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives- Sold To The Drugs Cartels - any criminal organization with the intention of supplying Sex Worker and drug trafficking and guns etc. operations and also Remember The Taliban takes control of Afghanistan - there is a big concern emerging. $85 billion worth of military guns and equipment left by the Americans is now under Taliban's control. As of Dec 31 2022 Sold Over 5 Million Weapons To 100s drug cartels all over the world Now... bang bang you're dead ! As passed by the Congress: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. U.S. Supreme Court: District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), “Right to bear Arms” is “clearly an individual right, having nothing whatsoever to do with service in the militia” and that it is a “Right” not to be disarmed by the Government and was not the granting of a new ‘right to have arms’. “The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting….It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” State Militia’s are completely separate from the Citizen’s Inherent Right ‘to bear Arms’. The “Right to bear Arms” is not a State Issue, it’s a Federal Issue. No State Law can override the Federal United States Constitution. In the present world, there are many criminal organizations and gangs known for their brutality and violence, which is the most discussed topic all around the world. So, today we are going to uncover some of those gangs in this video about the most dangerous gangs in the United Sates Most Dangerous Gangs In The United States and Overseas.

Do you believe in the unbelievable? For this list, we’ll be looking at the craziest and most well-known conspiracy theories that were actually investigated by an institutional body. Our countdown includes Princess Diana, Jimmy Hoffa’s Disappearance, Adolf Hitler’s Death, and more! Do you buy into any of these conspiracies? Why or why not? Is the U.S. Government Oppressing You? Contrarily, the U.S. government IS oppressing you, the U.S. government has been oppressing you for a long time, and the U.S. government will continue oppressing you well into the future. Is It China ? Russia ? Who ? - isn't: Its Your Own Government Who Kill You Who - Turning your children gay Who - Stealing your elections Who - Labeling parents domestic terrorists Who - Censoring you on social media Who - Claiming Antifa is just “an idea” Who - Prosecuting former President Donald Trump Who - Prosecuting thousands of Trump voters Who - Pumping billions of your tax dollars into Ukraine Who - Destroying the U.S. economy Who - Increasing your gas and grocery bills Who - Canceling your banking services Who - Pizzagate code words etc. Who - Children being trafficked Who - Private Pedophile Islands In 1963 the government I pay taxes to killed my president. In 2001, they terrorized my land and passed the Patriot Act to spy on me. In 2020 they released a virus on me then tried to force me to take a deadly vaxx. They print money constantly to steal my dollar. It's not democracy, it's dictatorship? A U.S. conservative blaming China for their problems is the equivalent of a U.S. liberal blaming Russia for their problems. Its easy to blame others for your own problems. We have all done it. But it is time to grow up and face the music. China, Russia, or any other country isn’t oppressing you, its your own government. We aren't dealing with “Chinese style communism” or “marxism” or “communism,” in general, and we’re definitely not dealing with “fascism.” The U.S. is dealing with an entirely new kind of beast; Western Neo-Liberalism Therefore, the next time someone blames China for something happening in the U.S. — or even the next time someone posts a video of something the Chinese government is doing to their own people, remember: It isn’t the Chinese government that is oppressing you, and pretending that it is is just avoiding the harsh reality of the situation at hand. Bohemian Grove: The Rich, the Powerful, and the Giant Stone Owl The mysteries surrounding the Bohemian Grove in Mont Rio, California, have been a favorite topic amongst conspiracy theorists for many years. The stories usually involve rich and powerful men meeting in the woods every year where they engage in pagan rituals and worship a giant stone owl. The owl reportedly plays voice recordings of member Walter Cronkite. Sounds pretty kooky right? Well, it turns out that CBS, NBC and ABC have confirmed the existence of the Grove. The Bohemian Club was formed in 1872 and quickly received attention and funding from wealthy businessmen. In 1942, the Grove hosted a meeting for the Manhattan Project that led to the creation of the atomic bomb. While it’s true that the most powerful men in the world come here and perform strange rituals in front of a giant owl, its mostly just a place for powerful men to behave like drunken frat boys. Operation Northwoods: How to Wage War on Cuba The U.S. government was involved in several crazy conspiracies during the 1950s and 1960s. Operation Northwoods was probably the nuttiest of them all. In 1962, the CIA planned to stage terrorist attacks on American citizens and military targets in Miami and Washington, blame it on the Cuban government and convince the American public to wage war on Cuba, which had, under the direction of Fidel Casto, recently become communist. The plan involved killing innocent people and soldiers, blowing up U.S. ships and Cuban refugee boats, hijacking airplanes and planting phony evidence to implicate the Cuban Government. Operation Northwoods was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and presented to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, before President John F. Kennedy rejected it. Of all of the great things JFK is remembered for, we should be most thankful that he had the power to stop this buffoonery. Operation Paperclip: Nazi Scientists Find Employment in America In 1945, the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency was given authorization to offer over 1,500 German scientists, technicians, and engineers from Nazi Germany and other countries employment in America. President Truman agreed to the program with the explicit instructions that it only includes those who were not found “to have been a member of the Nazi party, and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism.” This meant that Wernher von Braun, Arthur Rudolph, and Hubertus Strughold, who were listed as a “menace to the security of the Allied Forces,” would not be allowed to find new employment in America. The Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency decided these men were of vital importance to the development of the U.S. rocket program, created false employment and political biographies for the scientists and completely destroyed all evidence connecting them to the Nazi war machine. COINTELPRO: The FBI vs. 1960s Activists The 1960s were a time of radical social change. The counterculture blossomed into a full-blown anti-establishment phenomenon that spread across much of the western world. In response to the growing counterculture, the FBI created COINTELPRO, or the Counter Intelligence Program, for the purpose of “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order.” In other words, its purpose was to illegally disrupt dissident political organizations within the United States. COINTELPRO was active between 1956 and 1971. According to FBI records, 85% of the programs resources were spent on marginalizing, infiltrating and disrupting groups, such as the women’s rights movement, the non-violent civil rights movement, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover ordered FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the activities of these movements and their leaders. Operation Mockingbird: The CIA Propaganda Machine In 1948, Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects and told to create an organization that was capable of producing propaganda and engaging in economic warfare as part of the global war against Soviet Communism. The CIA took control of the office in the 1950s and maintained a secret campaign to influence media around the world for almost 25 years. Wisner “owned” respected members of The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other media outlets. By the 1950s there were around 3,000 CIA employees and dozens of large global media outlets working to maintain a complex propaganda machine. Wisner, who was always looking for new ways to convince the public of the dangers of communism, facilitated the 1954 animated Hollywood production of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. The Church Committee exposed the conspiracy in 1975 and calculated that misinforming the world cost taxpayers $265 million a year. The Business Plot: Fascism in America In 1933, Senator Prescott Bush – father of George Bush Sr. and grandfather of George W. Bush – tried to create a military coup against President Franklin D. Roosevelt and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. The plot included wealthy businessmen from Chase Bank, Goodyear, Standard Oil, GM, and the Du Pont family. Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler was asked to lead the coup. Apparently no one did a background check before they approached him. Smedley Butler, who was a vocal supporter of FDR, gathered evidence of the conspiracy and presented it to a Congressional Committee. Everyone implicated in the plot fiercely denied any involvement and no criminal charges were ever filed. The Committee confirmed Butler’s allegations, but was satisfied with having the conspiracy stopped before it started. The people who backed the Business Plot maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany until America entered World War II. CIA Assassinations In 1975, after the Watergate scandal, Senator Frank Church helped form the precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Commonly referred to as the Church Committee, their purpose was to investigate the CIA and FBI to ensure that they were operating within the law. The Committee quickly discovered that the CIA had started a hit man business. The CIA were responsible for the assassinations of Mossadegh in Iran, Allende (below) in Chile, as well as other leaders and revolutionaries in Central and South America, Africa, the Middle East and Eastern Asia. They made their assassinations appear like car accidents, suicides, cancers, and heart attacks. When their declassified “Heart Attack Gun” wasn’t necessary, they would just shoot their targets with actual bullets. While all of this is part of the congressional record, it’s still common for people to laugh this one off as a nutty conspiracy theory. Operation Snow White: The Church of Scientology Versus The U.S. Government During the 1970s, 5,000 covert agents from L. Ron Hubbard’s Church of Scientology conspired to perform the largest infiltration of the U.S. government in American history. The church infiltrated 136 organizations including the IRS, the DEA, foreign embassies and other government agencies. They installed wiretaps and stole hundreds of documents with the hopes of protecting their church and from paying millions of dollars in taxes. The U.S. government fought back. In July of 1977, the FBI organized a raid of various Scientology locations involving 156 agents. The raid uncovered the group’s illegal actions against the government as well as additional conspiracies against other perceived enemies of the church. On December 6, 1979, Operation Snow White ended when Mary Sue Hubbard, wife of L. Ron Hubbard, and 10 other high-ranking Scientologists received five-year prison sentences. L. Ron Hubbard remained an “unindicted co-conspirator” and spent the rest of his life in hiding. The 1990 Testimony of Nayirah In October of 1990, a 15-year-old girl named Nayirah offered testimony to the U.S. Congress stating that she had witnessed Iraqi soldiers taking 15 Kuwaiti babies out of incubators and leaving them on the floor to die. This testimony aired on about 700 television stations throughout the United States. President George Bush Sr. repeated the story at least 10 times in the following weeks in an attempt to sway public opinion towards supporting the Gulf War. The problem is that the events described by Nayirah were a complete fabrication. The CIA requested that Nayirah receive acting lessons before she testified. It was also discovered that Nayirah was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. who worked with the Kuwaiti government to promote U.S. involvement in the Gulf War. In response to these findings, Amnesty International accused the Bush administration of “opportunistic manipulation of the international human rights movement.” MKUltra: the CIA Mind-Control Project It’s the 1950s and Communist spies are everywhere. The cold war is heating up and it looks as though the Soviet Union might gain the upper hand on American Democracy. What would you do? With the hopes of discovering a “truth serum,” the CIA decided they needed to secretively dose unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens with LSD, and then interrogate and occasionally torture the participants. The CIA paid hospitals, prisons and universities for their participation and their silence. In 1973, CIA director Richard Helms ordered that all documents related to MKUltra be destroyed. While the conspiracy was eventually uncovered, nobody involved in the project “remembered” the details and a complete timeline of events remains incomplete. Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment In 1932, the U.S. Public Health Service conspired with the Tuskegee Institute to create a phony syphilis treatment program. The experiment, which involved lying to almost 400 African-American men who had been diagnosed with syphilis, was initially only supposed to last six months. It took until 1972 before the public became aware of the research and the government was forced to investigate and shut the program down. For 40 years these 400 men were often given dangerous chemicals and offered painful and unnecessary medical procedures under the guise of actual treatment. The fact that penicillin had become a known cure for syphilis was hidden from the patients so that the researchers could learn more about the disease. A government panel eventually deemed the study “ethically irresponsible” and in 1974, a class action suit was settled out of court for $10 million with lifetime health benefits for the surviving participants. There are plenty of conspiracy theories out there that help fuel the imaginations of the truly paranoid; NASA faked the moon landing, Paul McCartney has been dead since 1967, 9/11 was an inside job, and hybrid lizard humanoids are the real rulers of planet Earth. While it might be difficult to disprove the existence of our lizard overlords, most of these conspiracy theories fall apart with even a small amount of research. Here is our list of unbelievable conspiracy theories that are actually true.

Sex tourism is the practice of traveling to foreign countries, often on a different continent, with the intention of engaging in sexual activity or relationships in exchange for money or lifestyle support. It predominantly operates in countries where sex work is legal but there are countries where laws prohibit it. Human trafficking occurs on an international, national, and local level. Whether you live in a small town or a large city, human trafficking can be happening in your own backyard or apartment building. Human trafficking uses force, fraud, and/or coercion for the purpose of sexual exploitation or forced labor. Contrary to popular belief, as defined by law, human trafficking does not necessarily involve moving people across borders. There are many millions of victims worldwide, with estimates of 600,000 to 800,000 people being trafficked in the U.S. alone. Traffickers are able to exploit their victims in various ways, such as through sex work, forced labor, or organ removal and selling. Sex trafficking, in particular, is a multi-billion dollar industry, where the world is its market. Human beings who are trafficked get treated as disposable, humans become comparable to raw materials that can be bought and/or sold. Human Trafficking is a hidden crime and greatly under-reported. Within the U.S., women, men, and children fall prey to traffickers who often threaten their lives and those of their families and isolate victims making it impossible for them to escape. Many victims trafficked in the U.S. do not speak or understand English and are unable to communicate to ask for help. Sex Trafficking: Victims of sex trafficking can be found working in massage parlors, brothels, strip clubs, escort services, and on the streets. They are often children or teenagers lured by false promises and, ultimately, forced into prostitution. Labor Trafficking: Victims of labor trafficking can be found in both domestic and non-domestic situations, in various jobs, such as; nanny and maids, in factories, janitorial jobs, restaurants, hair and nail salons, in street sales, and on farms and construction sites. The victims are trapped into a cycle of debt, forced into involuntary servitude, debt bondage and slavery. Minors: More than 50% of victims worldwide are estimated to be under the age of 18. Under U.S. law, any person under 18 involved in the commercial sex industry is considered a Human Trafficking victim. Recognizing the Signs of Human Trafficking Person carries around keys for hotel rooms; Person seems to be under the control of another person; Person seems to be under continual surveillance; Person has all contacts controlled and monitored; Person doesn’t manage his/her own finances; Person does not possess own ID or travel documentation and lies about age; Person works excessively; Person lives in poor or cramped conditions, such as multiple-occupation household; Person is not paid or is paid very little; Person lives with employer; Person speaks little or none of the local language; Person exhibits fear of being deported; Person is seldom alone and is not allowed privacy; Person has visible injuries such as scars, burns, lacerations, and bruises; Person has injuries around head, including the face, nose, and mouth; Person has untreated infections and sickness; Person’s appearance betrays poor health and unsanitary living conditions; Person exhibits drug use; Person exhibits compliant, fearful, panicky behavior. More than 48 million people were estimated to be victims of modern slavery in 2022 – and one in four of those were children. Those are the findings of a new report produced by the International Labor Organization (ILO), a U.N. agency focusing on labor rights, and the Walk Free Foundation, an international NGO working to end modern slavery. The report estimates that last year, 25 million people were in forced labor – made to work under threat or coercion – and 15 million people were in forced marriage. It’s impossible to know exactly how many people are living in modern slavery, and different studies have produced different estimates. One reason is that modern slavery is a hidden crime that’s difficult to identify. Another is that different studies use different definitions of slavery, with some including forced marriage, for example, and others not. In the past, two of the most widely quoted figures have been those produced separately by the ILO and the Walk Free Foundation. Sex Tourism- Top Destinations of the world These days most tourists while planning for vacation are on the lookout for places where they can explore possibilities of uninhibited sex- not necessarily with their own partners. This would include sexual encounters and sexual surprises as a way of enhancing their travel experience. Globally the sex tourism industry is billions worth billions with millions of sex workers spread across the world comprising both legal and illegal. Evidence Necessary for a Charge of Child Porn When a person commits the federal crime of child pornography as stated within the federal definition context, he or she usually does so with the specific steps as needed for a possible conviction. Presenting the important evidence within the case to the courtroom is the most important aspect of convicting a person committing these crimes in usual circumstances. The Need to Define Child Pornography When a person faces possible charges for child porn, he or she must commit the crime as stated in the federal definition or as according to the state laws regarding this matter. The individual must possess, trade, create or distribute sexually explicit images or video of a person under the age of eighteen either in his or her home, online or in another way. The person may trade through a website that police may track and apprehend others engaging in the same crime. Often, when the police officers become involved, these crimes may include at least one other person if law enforcement is able to catch him or her. The Necessary Evidence To charge the person with child pornography, the police must observe some form of evidence to proceed with the case. This necessary evidence usually exists in photos, video files or data on a computer that was once one of these two items. Even erased, corrupted or deleted files are usually retrievable by law enforcement to charge the individual with child pornography crimes. This evidence presented in the courtroom through a prosecuting lawyer is generally sufficient to seek a favorable outlook from the judge or jury panel. However, the defense may have an effective strategy to defend against the charges and evidence presented. Files containing explicit child depictions in a sexual pose, with another person of any age in a sexual manner or that exposes the privates of the youth constitutes necessary evidence. Generally, these depictions are in file format on a computer with mislabeled names. The images may even hide behind other images for those perusing the computer. It may often take special software to discover the evidence for use in a criminal proceeding against the perpetrator. Depending on the intention of the person that possesses these files, he or she may have a valid defense in the courtroom for these images or video on his or her personal computing device. Accidental Child Pornography While the evidence is generally sufficient to pursue criminal charges against the individual, there are valid defenses against such crimes. Often, a valid defense that may have support is the accidental possession of child pornography. This is possible when someone downloads files that have other files embedded inside the folder or within the image. Some pictures have other pictures inside them either as an intentional harm to the individual or due to a virus or trojan infecting the computer. Some movie file may also contain sexually explicit images of all manner to include illegal photos of children. The Intentional Crime For charges to remain valid against a person with child pornography on a computer, the individual must intentionally acquire and possess the material. He or she must knowingly obtain explicit files of minors and attempt to receive, trade or distribute these images to others or to his or her own computer. The specific crime requires intentional actions and willful cooperation. Without this in the proceedings, the individual may have a valid defense against child pornography on the computer or another computing device. With little ability to track successfully, law enforcement relies on proving intention within these charges and crimes for conviction. Defense against Child Pornography and the Lawyer The most important and primary defense against these charges is a lack of knowledge or intent in acquiring child pornography on a computer. Downloading something with the graphic content attached is and remains a valid defense that the individual may successfully use. It is important to explain that possessing the content was not intentional in any way, and he or she would have deleted the material if knowledge was present. Consulting with a criminal defense lawyer is generally crucial in implementing a strategy for these crimes. Hiring a lawyer is often one of the first actions someone charged with possession or distribution of child pornography will accomplish. The lawyer will work hard to protect the rights of the client throughout the legal proceedings and engage in the use of a defensive strategy to defend against the charges to the best of his or her ability. Prosecution of Sex Crimes with Weak Evidence Many illegal sexual attacks and illegal sexual behaviors often do not happen in public areas. Therefore, many accusations are made without any witnesses to these crimes. Approaching these cases requires a dual commitment of protecting the victim who is reporting the crime and protecting the defendant’s legal rights. Severity of Conviction Conviction of either an illegal sexual attack or illegal sexual behavior often carries a very harsh punishment. Imprisonment may be for consecutive years. Additionally, the convicted may be placed on a sex offender registry. Depending on state or federal law, this may require the convicted to take polygraph tests, submit a sample of their DNA, be occasionally evaluated and monitored and be required to seek treatment. In addition to the demands of registration, a person labeled as a sex offender is often affected by a negative social stigma. Statistics Regarding Sex Crimes The number of cases being reported for illegal sexual attack and behavior has not steadily risen or declined over the years. Various statistics with many variables show that violent illegal sexual attacks and behavior are still a great threat throughout the nation. The most condemned sexual offenders were crimes against children. Ages range from the very young to under 13 to 18 year old children. According to statistics, most convicted sex offenders are male who commit crimes against females. However, there are also crimes reported against male victims. Though the number may be lower, crimes against males must also be taken seriously. Dishonest Reporting Collections of statistical data show that there may be as many as one in four of all reports of sexual attacks that prove to be false. Evidence in an illegal sexual attack may not need to be strong in order for the prosecution to convict with juries who are sympathetic to the victim. The horror of these crimes is often enough to convince a jury or judge on the word of the victim even if very little evidence is introduced. Plea Bargains Often the alleged perpetrator will accept a bargain of a lesser degree of punishment. Sometimes a defendant may receive no jail time but still be required to register as a sex offender. Often, the defendant accepts such an agreement because the alternative may be to face a prison term in excess of ten years. Criminal defendants who accept such agreements should be certain to receive information from a person hired to protect his or her legal interests who will thoroughly describe the consequences of accepting a plea agreement. This may include information about the effect of registration, including effects on employment opportunities, living in certain areas and maintaining a social relationship with certain individuals. Examples of False Accusations Because of the strong possibility of a sex crime being falsely reported and the potential serious ramifications of a conviction based on such an accusation, it is important to be able to identify when a victim may be making a false accusation. Studies show that in some cases of divorce the alleged victim is usually a minor child coerced by another parent to give testimony of illegal sexual attack or behavior that did not occur. In seeking to gain additional time with the child or sole custody, sometimes a parent will cross that line. In other cases, the alleged victim wants to seek revenge from a sexual partner for ending the relationship or not starting one. An entire scenario is created that leads to an unwarranted arrest of an innocent party. This could also be a case of mistaken identity. There are many times that false claims are used to convict an innocent person. Factors that Determine the Degree of the Crime In many jurisdictions, sex crimes may be classified in different categories. Each degree carries with it a different potential criminal sentence. There are often many factors that affect the degree of the crime. For sex crimes, one common factor is the nature of the sexual contact or behavior, with cases involving penetration usually being considered more serious. Another factor is the age of the victim. Similarly, if the victim was mentally, physically or emotionally disabled, the classification of the crime may be more serious. The crime may fit into a more serious degree when the perpetrator uses force, including making threats, harming the victim or having a weapon at the time of the sexual attack. Legal Considerations for Child Pornography Cases Few sex crimes bring more negative connotations to mind than those related to child pornography. In our computer age where information, images, and videos can be rapidly and easily accessed, this has become a growing area of concern. Although search engines have become better at filtering out inappropriate materials, it is still possible to occasionally come into contact with these matters, either intentionally or not. Charges related to child pornography can be devastating to families and careers, even if the charges are unfounded. Most cases start with a search warrant and a seizure of equipment which may include computers, hard drives, flash drives, discs, DVR systems, DVD players, MP3 players, cameras, smartphones, tablet computers, and anything else that can be used to store, view, or play images or videos. Search warrants can be acquired when a person reports finding child pornography on a computer. The reporting person may be a family friend, a computer technician that worked on the computer, an employer, or anyone who has direct or remote access to the system. In some cases, law enforcement personnel use downloaded peer-to-peer programs to search networked computers for files that include illegal contraband. Police may find accounts and IP addresses when websites posting or promoting contraband images are shut down. Many of these sites, some which are hosted in foreign countries, charge users for access and retain records of users and/or their computer IP addresses. And, of course, computers may be searched if seized incident to an investigation for another crime, such as computer fraud or prostitution if the computer is used to post ads on bulletin board sites. So, if you are under investigation for child pornography, what should you do? First, do not make statements to police or outside persons or parties. That means no discussion with family or friends regarding the facts of the case. Anything you say can be used to support criminal charges, even if you believe they tend to show your innocence. Exercise your right to remain silent and insist on speaking to an attorney and having him or her present before you will say anything to police. Do not expect to get your computer equipment back anytime soon. Whatever is on there is there for good and now you have to deal with the consequences. If you need a computer you may wish to replace the equipment and take appropriate steps to prevent any similar problems arising in the future. Possession of child pornography is a very serious offense. It should not be taken lightly. It can result in either federal or state charges (or sometimes both) depending on the particular facts. Mere possession of child pornography is a felony in most jurisdictions, while dissemination of child pornography is an even more serious offense. Moreover, a person convicted of child pornography charges is usually required to register as a sex offender, a label which will follow him or her for the rest of his/her life. If you have been charged with possession of child pornography, there are a few distinctions to bear in mind. First, possession of regular pornography is not a crime in most jurisdictions. Only possession of child pornography would be criminal. It requires that you had an intent to possess child pornography. That means the government must prove that you had the intent to possess the image(s) and that you had reason to know of its true content and character. Second, there are many ways you may have acquired images on a computer. Simply having the images somewhere in the memory of your computer does not prove that you had the requisite intent or knowledge to possess the image. Computers may have many users, files are often cached in memory without your knowledge, etc. That means determining which user may have accessed, downloaded or disseminated contraband child pornography images may be a significant defense issue. Even a one time user of a computer may contaminate its hard drive or cache memory with contraband. That is particularly true for computer systems that share an internet connection such as wireless networks at home. Additionally, files may also be downloaded blindly without knowing specifically about their content. For example, images may be downloaded by clicking on a link without first reviewing the content of the image being downloaded. This may occur with links found in newsgroups or other internet settings. Images can also be downloaded in bulk where each image is not reviewed before the download. Two simple examples may be when a person downloads multiple images associated with a zip file or by highlighting a series of links for download from file sharing programs. Also, as hacking attacks become more prolific, someone else may take control of your computer through a “backdoor” and use it to find, download, and view child pornography without your knowledge, either to frame you or to hide their own identity. Third, several states have ruled that a person cannot be convicted of "possessing" child pornography based on merely viewing pornographic images a home computer. Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin have had similar rulings on the issue. When an image is viewed on a computer, that image is "cached" by the web browser. That means it may exist on the computer without the person ever making an attempt to download the image. Though the person may have been aware of what they were viewing, they may have been unaware that they were automatically downloaded and saved to his computer, and therefore, didn't "knowingly possess" the pornography as state law requires. Even if the person saw what the site contained and immediately left, the image would have been on their computer and that was deemed insufficient for a child pornography conviction. Finally, search warrants that are used to seize computers and other equipment with electronic storage capacity may be flawed and unsupported by requisite probable cause. When probable cause is lacking for a warrant, any evidence taken as a result of that unconstitutional seizure may be suppressed and cannot be used at trial. Often search warrants are not sufficiently specific to allow police to seize certain storage devices, but they take them anyway. In such a case, the evidence would not be allowed at trial, as it exceeded the warrant's ability to interfere with your right against illegal search and seizure. If you have been accused of possession or distribution of child pornography, you should immediately seek the assistance of a qualified, experienced criminal defense attorney. If you are actually guilty of these acts, you may also wish to consider seeking psychiatric assistance to help you overcome these impulses. Unfortunately, whether guilty or not, these charges can be devastating, so it is important to minimize the damage as much as possible by seeking the best possible assistance from professionals as soon as possible. Sex Offenders and Predators Sadly, the news is constantly filled with reports of various sex crimes, like rape, teachers having sex with underage students, and child pornography rings. Another frequent story is that of the sex offender or predator who offends again and hurts somebody. But what is the truth behind sex offenders and predators? Which crimes will result in registration? How can you find out about sex offenders near you? Just how big of a threat do these people pose? Fortunately, you will probably be happy to know that most sex offenders are not likely to be a threat to you or your family. Given recent trends to impose more and more harsh sentences against those who commit sex-based crimes, many people are required to register as sex offenders that many would not consider dangerous. A quick review of sex offender registrations in your state will probably reveal that the vast majority of registered offenders would be guilty of bad judgment more than anything else. Generally, sex offenders have committed non-violent sexual crimes, and the vast majority are those who were over the age of majority while their significant other was still a minor, and someone's parents did not approve, resulting in a statutory rape charge. Statutory rape occurs anytime a person over the age of majority has sexual contact with a person under the age of consent, even if the contact is completely consensual and even if the minor lied about his/her age. Obviously, these individuals are not likely to pose too significant of a threat as this is typically a crime of bad judgment between individuals who are not grossly distant in ages, rather than a crime of evil or malicious intent or violent behavior. So now that we have defused some of the hysteria regarding sex offenders, what does it mean to be a sex offender or predator? In most states, anyone convicted of a sex-based crime can be required to register as a sex offender or predator. This registration usually lasts for life, and follows the person from state to state should they move. The individual who is registered as a sex offender or predator must always notify the government of his or her current address and in many locations they may not live within certain distances of different public facilities, like schools, parks, or churches. Furthermore, the individual's registration information usually remains a matter of easily accessible public record, normally retrievable through a simple search of local or state law enforcement websites or a number of third party websites. Depending on the jurisdiction, virtually any sex-based crime can be required to register as a sex offender or predator. These can include rape, lewd and lascivious behavior, child molestation, statutory rape, child pornography, indecent exposure, obscenity, and (in some jurisdictions) even prostitution or solicitation for prostitution. The nature of the crime will likely usually determine whether one is an offender or a predator. The vast majority of those who must register are merely sex offenders. These are normally people who committed non-violent sexual offenses, and, as noted above, a very large majority of those are guilty of mere statutory rape. Other crimes may include indecent exposure, obscenity, possession of child pornography, and prostitution, among others. Sexual predators, on the other hand, are usually guilty of more serious sexual crimes, and generally ones in which violence or actual lack of consent are involved, like rape. Unfortunately, little is done to differentiate between the different types of crimes in which registration is required. As a result, many non-violent sexual offenders who engaged in conduct that would be unlikely to be repeated are also required to register and are confused with the more dangerous sexual predators. This can result in difficulty finding housing, employment, and a wide array of personal humiliation and embarrassment lasting for the rest of the individual's life. However, if you are concerned about locating sex offenders and predators in your area, the task is usually pretty straightforward. There are a number of private sites dedicated to this purpose, but most states also have a registration system that will provide a way to search around a given address to see how many offenders or predators may be in your area, what their addresses are, and usually provides you a photograph so you can see what they look like. Also, these sites usually provide information about what the individual's actual criminal offense was so you can determine just how bad of a threat (if any) these people may pose to your or your family. Obviously, a large part of this article has been dedicated to trying to remove a lot of the sensationalism from sex offenders. But, if you find you do have a sexual predator living near you, you may have reason to be concerned. Obviously, forewarned is forearmed, but this should not be taken to an extreme. An unintended side effect of the registration of sex offenders and predators has been to incite violence against these individuals. While it may be wise to keep an eye on someone who has previously been convicted of a violent sexual offense, it is not okay to take the law into your own hands by attacking this person, defacing their property, or threatening them in any way. For more information about what to do if a sex offender moves into your neighborhood, you may wish to speak with a real estate attorney or, if you live in a community association, someone familiar with community association law or the policies of your community, like a board member, attorney, or property manager. What Legally Makes It Child Pornography ? Child pornography is a crime that deals with some of the harshest and most serious laws that a person can face. Regardless of the specifics of the event or material involved, the first offense is met with heavy punishment, and subsequent offenses result in even harsher criminal sentences. There are officially two types of material considered child pornography, simulated, or digitally generated, and pornography produced with the direct involvement of the minor. With the production of child pornography other charges may be included, such as child abuse, and many other laws may come into play during the case. Defining Child Pornography Pictures of child pornography are not secure under First Amendment rights and are unlawful items under federal law. Though there are only two types of child pornography, those categories include several forms of material and media. Under federal law, any visual portrayals of sexually explicit behavior involving a minor are considered child pornography. Visual illustrations containing child pornography are deemed illegal under federal law. These may include photographs, videos, digital downloads, images produced to depict an actual minor, undeveloped film and video and electronically stored data. Sexual activity is not needed in the image to be considered pornography. The images may contain a nude picture of a child that is deemed sexually suggestive and be considered illegal. Child pornography under federal law is the disregard for age of consent for sexual activity in a given state. Some states consider age of consent to be younger than 18 years old, but when child pornography is concerned, any depiction of a minor under the age of 18 engaging in sexually explicit conduct is unlawful. Laws Controlling Child Pornography The specific kind of charge varies depending on the situation and severity of violation. Not all cases are charged as federal cases; however, all cases involving the internet will be covered under federal law. States may file charges against a suspect in addition to federal charges. Penalties may vary based on various actions regarding the creation, possession or distribution of child pornography. This includes any activity related to the categories of filming or photography, storing on a computer hard drive, DVD or hard copies and the distribution and sale of the material through any and all means. Any acts that affect interstate or foreign commerce such as delivering items through the United States mail or across state or international lines will be considered a federal offense. Federal jurisdiction applies similarly when the Internet is used to transfer pornographic images or videos of minors across state lines. This standard is so strict that, even if the pornographic depictions themselves did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be involved if the materials used in the transfer, such as the computer used to download the copy or the CD Rom used to store the material, originated or up to that time moved in interstate or foreign commerce. If there is the smallest connection at all, federal laws can be implicated. Included in the international control of child pornography production is Section 2260 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This particular section proscribes any persons outside of the United States to competently generate, assemble, transport, distribute or allot child pornography with intent to import or spread the pornographic depictions into the United States. Section 2251 of Title 18 of the United States Code makes it illegal to influence, encourage, entice or pressure a minor to participate in sexually explicit behavior for purposes of the production of pornographic material. Any attempts to violate these laws may be considered an offense, even if the offender did not succeed in fully creating the material. Section 2251A of Title 18, specifically states that any parent, legal guardian or other individual in care of the youth cannot buy, sell or relegate custody of that minor for the purposes of making child pornography and will be punished fully under federal law. A person may be charged under both state and federal law without violating double jeopardy prohibitions. State laws vary from federal law, but they often contain similar language regarding federal charges. Contact a Lawyer The production, possession or distribution of child pornography is a serious crime. If there is any evidence that someone is committing an act that is connected to child pornography, it is best to contact the police or a lawyer. If an individual is charged, a lawyer should be sought immediately. Statute of Limitations for Child Pornography Statutes of limitations are a set of regulations governing the amount of time after a cause of action arises by which the case must be brought or be barred from being heard by the court. Statutes of limitations apply to a wide range of cases, including civil causes of actions like breach of contract claims and tort claims. However, statutes of limitations can also apply in the criminal context. These statutes usually run from the date when the offense was committed and last for a certain number of years. If a person committed a crime but the statute of limitations has expired, the prosecution is usually barred from prosecuting the case. Reasons for Statutes of Limitations The rationale behind having a statute of limitation is that it allows a judicial body to make a decision within a reasonable length of time. Additionally, statutes of limitations help ensure that cases are brought when the memory of witnesses is fresher and the evidence is more reliable. Deviations from the Standard Statute of Limitations In some circumstances, the statute of limitations can be extended past the standard statute of limitations. One such reason for this deviation is when the victim is a minor. Therefore, in cases involving sexual abuse of a minor, the statute of limitations may be subject to an extension based on the child reaching the age of majority. Guidelines For many non-capital offenses, the federal statute of limitations is five years from the date when the crime was committed. Some states have shorter statutes of limitations. In this situation, a person who is not charged under state law because the statute of limitations has expired can still be charged under a federal charge with a longer statute of limitations. In contrast, some state statutes of limitations are longer than a comparable federal charge. Some states have statutes of limitations for three or four years. Others have statutes of limitations for seven years. In some instances, there is no applicable statute of limitations, allowing the prosecuting body to bring forth charges at any time during the defendant’s lifetime. Criminal Punishments Child pornography charges are some of the most serious and highly punishable. Maximum sentences may be life sentences. Additionally, criminal penalties are usually higher for second or subsequent offenses than they are for a first offense. However, even first time offenders can face serious criminal punishments. First time offenders of producing child pornography can face punishments under federal law of 15 to 30 years in prison and fines. Being convicted of transporting child pornography can result in a criminal sentence of 5 and 20 years in prison and fines. When criminal defendants are facing sentencing, a number of factors are considered, including any prior criminal history, the nature of the offense and circumstances surrounding the charge. In child pornography cases, some of the factors that can affect a sentence include whether the images in question are considered violent or sadistic, the number of photos that were produced and whether the minor suffered sexual abuse. Some conditions may result in aggravated charges, such as if the images contained brutal elements or sexually attacked the victim. When a criminal defendant convicted of a child pornography is released, he or she is usually required to register as a sex offender. There may be additional conditions imposed upon him or her, including not living in a residence with children, staying a certain number of feet away from a school or daycare center and keeping the authorities updated with his or her current contact information. Legal Assistance Individuals who are facing charges for child pornography often decide to contact a criminal defense lawyer to protect their legal rights and build a defense. Victims or their families may wish to talk to a lawyer to learn about their rights and about how any statutes of limitations can affect the case. Nuances in statutes of limitations can be complex and require a careful legal analysis. Federal Sex Crimes Explained Many states have specific laws that prosecute sex crimes in a harsh manner. In some instances, these same crimes are prosecuted as federal cases as well. These tend to be the more aggravated crimes among those also tried state-side. Convictions with one or both cases may lead to severe punishments in jail or prison and fines. When sex crimes are committed in most states, sex offender registration is mandatory. If a double conviction occurs, extensive jail or prison years may be issued along with fines and other penalties, depending upon how severe the sexual crimes committed were. In federal crimes, mandatory guidelines may be used for sentencing convicted offenders. State and Federal Courts with Sex Crimes State and federal courts may be tasked with trying criminal defendants for sex crimes. However, some sex crimes cross certain boundaries, implicating state and federal crimes. While state courts are local to the county or city the crime is committed in, federal courts are established by the United States Constitution. State courts have varying laws for each state and possess enough power to convict and sentence criminals to whichever appropriate punishment fits the broken law. These courts typically handle family disputes, theft of funds, theft of good, general theft, broken contracts and related claims. Other such cases including criminal, antitrust, bankruptcy and other crimes at an elevated level are often out of state jurisdiction. At the federal level, crimes that states cannot try are completed with guidelines in sentencing issued by an agency that oversees these guidelines. State and Federal Involvement Most criminal cases concerning offenses that violate laws set forth by the state are heard and tried in a state court. However, if a federal law has been broken, these cases are sent to a federal court. When both state and federal laws are connected in the crime committed, both state and federal courts may try the offender. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that facing criminal conviction for state and federal charges is not in violation of a person’s freedom from double jeopardy. What is a Federal Crime? When a crime is committed that violates federal legislation, it is considered a federal offense. Though many crimes considered criminal and not just civil are tried in the states associated with the crime, any federal offense committed against the legislation or federal law is prosecuted in a federal court. Some crimes committed start out as state crimes but are elevated to federal crimes when certain factors are incorporated. Some sex crimes when aggravated become federal level due to the severity or additional aspects related to the initial crimes. Conviction brings mandatory minimum sentencing with potential for enhancements that increase sentence minimums and fines along with other potential penalties. After prison terms have ended, the person usually has a probation period or parole. Sex offender registration is frequently obligatory at the federal level, but if it does not apply, the state may automatically require this penalty. National Sex Registration For those that must comply with sex offender registration at a national level, many characteristics of the convicted offender are available to the public through online searches. These usually include the convicted person’s name, address of residence, a headshot picture and descriptions of all sexually committed offenses. These are all posted publicly within the registry. Anyone with access to the internet who knows the website is able to peruse the registry to find offenders in his or her local community. The registration often lasts years, but it may keep data until the offender’s life ends. The registration may limit and restrict housing, job searches, areas the offender may come in contact with and interactions with whichever type of person he or she offended. This often includes restrictions related to proximity to schools, parks, housing communities and some public entertainment areas may be restricted by a certain distances. Other Punishments for Sex Crimes When conviction of a federal sex crime occurs, the offender may be required to attend a federal medical center as part of the conditions of his or her sentence or release. Mandatory visits to the Federal Bureau of Prisons Facility are required by some when crimes fit the needs. The facility is set up to treat the terminally ill, mentally ill and sexual offenders. Those that must attend this facility are enrolled in the residential Sex Offender Treatment Program or the Sex Offender Management Program. These intensive treatment programs are designed to assist sex offenders with their internal issues involving what caused them to commit the sex crime. Common Types of Federal Sex Crimes Most crimes that involve children are cases tried at a federal level. These may include sexual assault, possession of child pornography, rape or sharing child pornography with others to varying degrees. Other federal sex crimes may be aggravated sexual abuse, offenders with multiple offenses, exploitation of children in a sexual manner, human trafficking, abusing a minor sexually, when death is the result of sexual abuse, when children are purchased or sold for sexual purposes and other related crimes. When a person’s sexual crimes cross state lines, federal charges are often implicated. Internet Sex Crimes Sex crimes are prevalent in each state to varying degrees. Of these, many offenders are convicted of crimes involving interactions through the internet. Some use profiles to capture the attention of specific people, while others create or distribute illegal content such as child pornography. While many feel safe cruising the internet while believing they are anonymous, many are unaware of just how watched some are when browsing online. Not all internet crimes may be discovered, but those that are may be harshly penalized when convicted. Accusations Cause Difficulty Accusations of sex crimes may cause a loss of reputation, social damage beyond repair, ruination of relationships and other related problems. The very accusation may be the foundation for charges in some states, potentially leading to conviction. Accusations of these severe crimes often cause others to lose faith in the accused individual. Some relationships may fail because allegations are believed even though the defendant has not even been convicted. Those in the community the alleged criminal resides in may treat him or her with prejudice based on the accusations alone. Sex Crimes are an Illegal Activity Various activities online are illegal. To be an internet sex crime, any activity conducted through use or aided by the internet must be involved. This may include possession or distribution of child images or video of a sexual subject or manner, attempting to entice or encourage a minor’s interactions in a chat room or sending provocative photos or video to a minor. Requesting these may incur additional charges of possession of child pornography as well. These crimes are often complicated with charges at both a state and federal level. Crimes of Child Pornography When sex crimes are committed online, these often include charges involving the collection of visual depictions of minors or those that have graphic images of sexual contact or nakedness. Downloading or distributing these images across state lines causes these offenses to be upgraded to the federal level. This may be through server exchanges, transport via routers or even movement with conventional vehicles. Penalties for these crimes are often harsh with potential additional punishments added on based on the factors of the crime involved. The amount of photos, depictions, age and various similar factors are included in sentencing determination. Online Inducement and Requests Luring minors online through enticements with the intent of committing the crime of sexual abuse is a second-degree crime in many states. The minor must be under the legal age of the state, which is usually eighteen. Often prosecution must prove that the perpetrator was soliciting someone under the age of eighteen, some type of attempt was made to entice the youth and intention of committing a crime with the minor was in place. This also involves the use of the internet in the crime. Penalties through conviction may lead to a prison stay of at least five years. Sex offender registration is a likely possibility if the state requires this. When defending against these charges, the intent behind actions must be proven. Sex Offender Registration As with most sex crimes, sex offender registration is required in most states. Any sex offender must register based on the stipulations in the state the crime was committed in and submit various identifying information for the registration. Depending upon the state and crime, registration may be for years or for life. Additionally, sex offenders are often required to register their residence when they move into a new state. Megan's Law There are variations of Megan’s Law in every state, but guidelines may differ depending upon certain factors. These guidelines are to administer how the sex offender’s information is permitted for viewing by public individuals. Some states have registration through a database with public access, but others have internet registration accessible only to a few. Notifications of sex offenders are often made available to the community he or she will become a part of. Some states such as New Jersey have regulations on how sex offenders must adhere. This may require those registered to avoid specific towns or areas that ban those with registration. This may additionally ban special areas where sex offenders with a history of crimes against children might run into such young people. Finding a Lawyer for Internet Sex Crimes If accused, it is best to find a lawyer that has knowledge about sex crimes. With internet involvement, the lawyer should be well-versed with how to access and use the internet and how these instances apply to these cases. Defenses to Possession of Child Pornography Possession of child pornography is a serious crime with potential harsh punishments based on state and federal charges. It is common for such charges to involve a federal investigation that turns up multiple forms of prohibited conduct. Some cases involve celebrities or respected members of the community. Being charged with such a crime can have a significant impact on a person’s professional and personal relationships. However, there may be many defenses that are available to someone facing this type of charge. Some common charges include: Defendant Is Not in Possession One common defense is that the prohibited material does not belong to the defendant. This defense may be raised when the content is found on a computer that is shared, such as a work computer. Someone else may download the content and then accuse the defendant of doing it. This defense may also arise if an angry spouse, disgruntled employee or other individual who is after the defendant downloads the content in an attempt to frame the defendant. The person who plants this prohibited conduct may then tip off police as to its existence. A criminal defense lawyer can help establish this defense such as by having a computer forensic expert show how and when the content in question was downloaded or by establishing that it was not possible for the defendant to download the material. The Content In Question Is Not Child Pornography In order to be considered child pornography, the content must meet a specific definition. This content is typically that depicting naked children or sexually explicit content featuring children. If the content does not include children, it cannot be considered child pornography. There is also content that is exempted by the Motion Picture Association of America, such as specific drawings or films. Additionally, content that serves an educational or scientific purpose may not be considered child pornography. Unintended Possession Another possible defense to child pornography possession charges is that the possession was not intentional. This defense can arise if someone accidentally receives child pornography through email or accidentally clicking on something on a website. Simply by going to certain websites due to a typographical mistake in the web address can result in such content immediately downloading. A criminal defense lawyer can help establish this defense by showing the limited time that a person spent on a particular website. Another defense of this nature may arise when the defendant intended to view pornographic material but did not intend to view that depicting children. Illegal Search In some cases, the defendant may be able to raise a defense not based on his or her actual innocence but based on procedural errors that were made in the process in violation of his or her constitutional rights. For example, the defendant may be able to successfully argue that the incriminating evidence was illegally seized by police. This defense may arise if the warrant was illegally obtained because the law enforcement officer who obtained the warrant lied in order to get it. In other situations, police may have went beyond the scope of the warrant, such as by searching locked boxes or computers that were not specifically named in the search warrant. Psychological Addiction Caused It This defense may be used to help minimize the sentence that the individual receives if convicted. While this will not usually result in a dismissal of the charges, it may held the defense receive a sentence involving a treatment program instead of incarceration. Entrapment Entrapment occurs when police operate a sting operation in which they arrest a person after encouraging him or her to commit a crime that the defendant otherwise would not have committed. Once the defendant completes the transaction to purchase or download child pornography, police arrest the defendant. This defense may arise when the defendant purchases content that was not clearly child pornography or labeled with an ambiguous title. Legal Assistance Individuals who are suspected of violating possession of child pornography laws may wish to contact a criminal defense lawyer. He or she can explain the defendant’s rights. Additionally, he or she can discuss defenses that may apply to the case depending on the particular circumstances involved and work to protect the defendant’s constitutional rights. Potential Problems of Laws Like Jessica’s Law Sex offenders are often viewed as some of the worst offenders. This often leads to unfair treatment at trial and abuse within prison walls. Jessica’s Law, annotated at Texas Penal Code 21.02, is a prime example of the danger that can exist when sex offenders are treated differently than other types of offenders. What Is Texas Penal Code 21.02? This law is titled “The Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child.” The law states that an individual is guilty of committing this offense if he or she commits two or more acts of sexual abuse within 30 or more days. This is computed if there are any offenses toward any child, not just the victim in question at the moment. The law applies if the offender is 17 or older and the victim is younger than 14. It was enacted in 2007 and is a version of Jessica’s law but is a Texas state law. In particular Search For Legal Articles the law was enacted a year after a Texas judge had a case in which a child victim testified to being abused more than 100 times by the same perpetrator. The judge stated that a new penal statute should be implemented that focused on a continuing course of conduct. Constitutional Challenges Jessica’s Law and similar laws across the country have encountered several constitutional challenges. One source of contention is that these types of laws tend to result in a harsher punishment when compared to nearly any other felony in the state. Another source of contention is that some of the crimes that can result in being prosecuted under Texas Penal Code 21.02 do not require a unanimous jury verdict, including aggravated kidnapping with the intent to sexually abuse the victim, sexual assault, sexual performance by a child, indecency with a child and aggravated sexual assault of a child. The jury is only required to determine whether the defendant committed two or more acts listed in the statute and are told that they do not have to have to base this determination off of a unanimous finding to this effect on the predicate offenses. However, this issue is complex as some appellants have successfully argued that a jury must decide every element of a crime charged in a unanimous manner. In one such challenge, the United States Supreme Court held that the jury has to unanimously decide that a defendant committed a series of violations based on a different offense as well as which particular violations made up the necessary continuing series. The Court specifically stated that each violation was considered a separate element under a particular statute, so the jury was required to agree unanimously about these separate predicate offenses. The Texas appeals court has interpreted the United States Supreme Court holdings and rhetoric in a different manner. In particular, the courts have focused on the Supreme Court’s exception that states that if the criminal statute includes a single element as a series, the jury only has to unanimously agree that the defendant committed the requisite number of crimes but not the particular crimes. If each crime is not considered a separate element, then the court reasons that the jury only has to find that the requisite number of crimes were committed. In other cases, the Supreme Court has held that the jury may not have to return a unanimous verdict on every aspect of the crime, such as determining whether a murder was premeditated or felony murder. Consequences of These Laws Many such statutes include harsh criminal penalties, such as Texas’ law that includes a 25-year sentence or a maximum of a 99-year sentence with no chance for parole. Because the law contains a minimum sentence, prosecutors are not able to plea bargain a lighter sentence when the 25-year minimum is overzealous. Another concern that some have is that many cases of sexual abuse involve family members, so other relatives may be hesitant to contact authorities if this may mean that their loved one may get a life sentence. Legal Assistance Individuals who are being investigated for allegations of sexual abuse may wish to contact a criminal defense lawyer. He or she can explain the individual’s rights and the applicability of any law on the books that may impact the case, such as Jessica’s Law. He or she can also review if a constitutional challenge may be made to such a law. A criminal defense lawyer is responsible for establishing a solid defense when a client is charged with a crime. He or she may also help negotiate for a plea bargain in order to receive a reduced charge or sentence. When Teens Make Child Pornography The use of technology in the age of computers provides for the ability to create video and audio files from real-life situations to include sexual relations between one or more parties that may end in the making of child pornography. When a teen engages in this type of activity, he or she may face a juvenile criminal court or other consequences depending on the nature of the crime. It is easy to make child pornography when both possess a cell phone and are able to capture sexual relations in action. The distribution of such video is a sex crime, and the state may punish those involved with severe penalties. If the parties in the video or that send the video are young enough, the juvenile criminal system takes on the case and attempts to impress the seriousness of the actions of those that sent and took the media. However, if one party is over the age of majority for the state or there is a large gap in ages, this could lead to criminal charges of one person charged as an adult. The Self Capture Many that unintentionally create child pornography at a young age take selfies with others that are either naked or in a compromised position in the video or photo. No matter what the device taking the media, the parties could become involved in a child pornography case even if the file remains on the original device or computer of one of the targets. If law enforcement discovers the media, the parties could face criminal charges as either a minor in the juvenile criminal system before a judge or as an adult. The selfie sent to others leaves the hands of the original creator, the problem may become larger and wider than initially started with the one phone, camera or computer cam. What Child Pornography Is Child pornography is a federal offense with a defined explanation through the sexually explicit capture of video, photo or media when containing a minor. The minor’s age is relevant to the charges. While the crime goes to court on a federal level, the state determines if the person is a minor in the capture. Almost any offense through the use of the internet that involve a youth classified as a minor will constitute child pornography and the federal authorities will charge the person immediately. However, an investigation may provide the law enforcement agency with more evidence for the conviction. The consequences of involvement in child pornography normally apply mandatory sentences to the person convicted of such charges. If children engage in these crimes, the penalties may increase to the adult level depending on the nature of the content, how the media dissemination occurred and if there are any aggravating factors. Broadcasting the material online may lead to the tracking down of the culprit and charges launched against him or her even if he or she is a minor. Then, it is up to the courts to try him or her as a juvenile or an adult. Potential Consequences of Child Pornography When the parties involved in the child pornography are teens, the judge may determine that the matter requires rehabilitation rather than punishment. However, if the factors surrounding the incident are serious, he or she may decide that one or both parties should proceed as adults in the case. If adult charges lead to a criminal court case, one or both parties may face sex crimes in the courtroom. Normally, the person that distributes the media is the culprit that will go before the judge. However, if others commit the same crime, they could also face lesser or similar charges. The consequences are often serious such as jail or prison terms for a first offense. Others may need to register as a sex offender for possessing and distributing child pornography. If the person is underage and considered a minor in the state, he or she may only face juvenile criminal court. Then, the judge may determine that a different route is necessary such as rehabilitation through education and counseling programs. If that is the case, the teen may not face life-altering sentences. Child Pornography Teen Support No matter how the teen distributes the media or causes problems with child pornography, he or she generally requires the services and support of a legal professional. A lawyer to explain the matter and the seriousness of charges to include the adult criminal system. He or she will work to defend the teen in court. Does Spousal or Marital Immunity Cover Child Porn on My Home Computer ? There are instances where a court will use exemptions to spousal or marital immunity to ensure that one spouse is able to testify against the other when he or she engages in child pornography with a home computer. This provides the court the opportunity to discover the full scope of the problem and if any other culprits are part of the problem. The Exception There are many times that the prosecution or civil litigation lawyer may use exceptions to convince one spouse to testify against the other. The courts would need to examine the specific case and circumstances of the matter. If there are certain issues such as possible child pornography and the spouse was aware or knows where the information is, he or she may need to testify to help prosecution put the person away from the crime. Often, the exception will provide the opportunity to testify if the crimes occur with the child of the spouse. Then, the immunity or privilege of a spouse is not in play. The Child Pornography Case Cases of child pornography are often severe. The individual on trial will own, distribute, trade or sell images or video of graphic scenes with minors. Usually, the depictions are blatant or suggestive. Additional factors may include seriously young victims, pictures found online through certain websites that provide the data or hacked systems that may possess various pictures or video. An investigation into the matter may provide the prosecution with additional areas of proof or in helping the police or agency in discovering numerous other culprits of the same crime. Then, the prosecution may convince the spouse to forego privilege and testify against the defendant. Investigations and the Child The initial investigation into the case that leads to the arrest of the person engaging in child pornography usually uncovers images or video of the crime. However, if the prosecution and police have additional evidence, the investigation may continue until everyone is certain and satisfied that there is nothing else to find. At that point, it is important to determine how to proceed. If the spouse is cooperative with the police, he or she may also cooperate and help with the prosecution. By testifying against the spouse, the individual foregoes spousal or marital privilege and may give testimony within the courtroom. To assist the police and prosecuting lawyer, the group may show the evidence to the spouse. It is often not necessary to accomplish this if the child affected is within the family or someone that spouse knows. The injuries to the youth may also incite anger and righteous fury with the wife or husband to seek justice for the criminal activity. To could lead to the spouse providing a personal computer, additional hard drives or locations where the romantic partner would hide items. This may also include a storage unit, online access or accounts that hold information or video or camera captures of proof of the crimes. Inapplicable Immunity There are instances where the effects of child molestation or forced sexual interactions could lead to the revocation of immunity between spouses. This generally applies to cases where the child of the family is the victim and there is communication between the two spouses about the possible case or materials that may affect the strength of the case against the perpetrator. It is important to consider all factors when there is the potential to admit the testimony of the spouse. The exceptions are not often considered in these cases until the matter arises. It is at the time of the child pornography proceedings that the problem may rise to the circuit court. Federal evidence law becomes part of the case when determining if the child pornography and any sex crimes affect the spousal or marital privilege. Immunity in these matters may not exist depending on the circumstances. Communications between spouses may lack the immunity of spousal privilege if one spouse harms the other or a member of the family. However, without this, the court may have little recourse in forcing the legal partner into testifying against him or her. Legal Defense and Spousal Immunity The spouse will need a criminal defense lawyer, and the other spouse may need to communicate possible immunity factors with the legal professional if he or she does not want to testify against the spouse. The lawyer may need to work hard to determine if immunity will apply or if the court will revoke it. Showing Porn to a Minor - Is It a Crime ? The crimes connected to exposing a minor to various types of pornography involve obscenity, but this is not a specific protection within the Amendments to the United States Constitution. The local authorities may charge the individual with an area or location crime rather than a federal or state charge based on the activity. Obscenity Explained Some states may have no laws against exposing a minor to pornography, but others use the rule of obscenity. This is when, through a specific test, the individual uses visual or graphic depictions, written or even spoken words to influence or harm another person. It is illegal to transfer, distribute, trade and sell items of obscene material through federal law. The law does not prevent possession of these items, but the individual is not able to legally use mail, carriers or internet services as a means of transport. It is possible to commit a federal crime when involving obscene items. Obscenity and Minors It is a violation of federal law to distribute or expose obscene materials to minors. The individual is a minor when under the age of sixteen for federal laws. The material may include any physical or digital copy to include the use of the internet. The perpetrator may suffer various penalties under federal law when violating obscenity laws. Website owners or administrators may face possible criminal charges for misleading minors with domain names or the content in a website. The use of children’s material to entice a minor into the site is one way to violate these laws.

Per U.S.A. Government Everyone Is A Criminal Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment. Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. Per U.S.A. Government DOA-DOJ-FBI-CIA-Etc. Everyone In U.S.A. All Person And Or America Citizens Right Now Today Is A Criminal As of Oct 2023 Need To Be In Jail Or Pay $$$ Fines Now. Per all federal and local police and all government agencies. All The America People Break The Law's Average 3 Times Everyday with A Average Fine of $512 dollars a day. it add up to $512 x 365 days in a year add up to $186,880 Dollars per year in fines per every person alive today right now. also federal and local agencies issue an average of 27 rules for every law over the past decade. However, the rules issued in a given year are typically not substantively related to the current year’s laws, as agency output represents ongoing implementation of earlier legislation. Remember That Ignorance of the law is a fundamental legal principle in the US that means that if someone breaks the law, they are still liable even if they had no knowledge of the law being broken. According to a 2020 article, the more than 300,000+ laws and regulatory crimes on the federal law books serve little purpose other than inviting arbitrary enforcement by providing prosecutors the tools to charge nearly anyone every day for your life with violating some long-forgotten regulation or law and to pay the fines now or go to jail for everyone in the U.S.A.. Government Every Man, Women, & Child Is A Criminal & Need 2 Go To Jail for life. A cell phone app is a smartphone add-on that performs functions other than making a phone call, ranging from GPS map to games to medical monitoring and speeding in your car. So per GPS mapping every street and speed limits of all roads in all town and roads every place of earth we can see you every move and every person driving or moving around town by car or truck... so if you drive 30 mile per hour in a 25 miles per hour zone you get a ticket for speeding etc. your cell phone will tell your speed everyday and night too. most people will get 3-5 tickets a day. you are your brothers keeper and every cell phone in car will get a ticket for speeding and you pay your fine or go to jail. So Per U.S.A. Government Every Man, Women, & Child Confiscation of all property and all assets you have to pay all tickets and all fines every day of your life. P.S. Remember All The America People Break The Law's Average 3 Times Everyday with A Average Fine of $512 dollars a day. So per U.S.A. new land reform and confiscation all personal property to pay all new court fines was not only an economic or administrative process of taking and redistributing deeds or legal ownership of land. It was a two party system's republican and democratic parties -led to new mass movement which turned peasants (its you baby) into active participants and which pushed for political and ideological change beyond the immediate economic question of all land confiscation and ownership rights are gone. If you have a home the state will take it for the fines you own to the state now. you can stay in your old home as a renter with 3 other family to move in with you to help the homeless problem. In order for housing to be considered affordable, a family should not spend more than 30% of its income on rent. Thus, a working family needs to earn nearly $42 per hour – or roughly $87,000 per year – to afford the average rent in Los Angeles. In Los Angeles, the median rent is 46.7% or nearly half of median income. 509,404 low-income renter households in the county do not have access to an affordable home. As of July 10, 2023 - While some states are on a schedule for annual increases to eventually reach $15 an hour, 12 states still adhere to the federal minimum. Although the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 has not budged since 2009, more than 20 states have provided additional increases in 2023. Why Minimum Wage Isn’t Enough Picture this: Jane Doe is a single adult working a full-time (40 hours per week) minimum wage job. Jane wants to rent a modest one-bedroom apartment. No matter where Jane lives in America, and regardless of whether Jane lives in a state with a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage, Jane will be unable to do so. Why? Because there’s no state in America in which a person working a full-time job that pays minimum wage can afford to rent a one-bedroom apartment. This shocking fact comes from the National Low Income Housing Coalition’s recently-released report, “Out of Reach 2015.” The report analyzes the Department of Housing and urban Development’s estimated Fair Market Rent (FMR)—which is defined as the 40th percentile of rents for typical, non-substandard rental units, including the cost of utilities—in relation to wages earned in each state. The report estimates the earning necessary to rent one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments without spending more than 30 percent of a household’s total income on rent. Let’s look at how the information presented in this report might impact Jane Doe’s apartment search: To rent a one-bedroom FMR apartment, Jane would need to earn $15.50 per hour. This is more than twice the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. Even the proposed federal minimum wage of $10.10 per hour would be insufficient for Jane to rent an apartment. To a rent a two-bedroom FMR apartment, Jane would need to earn $19.35 per hour. If Jane lives in Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Virginia, or Washington, she’ll need to make over $20 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment. The average national FMR price for a one-bedroom apartment is $806 per month. That means Jane would need to work 86 hours per week in her minimum wage job to afford the cost of rent. Unfortunately for Jane, findings in the “Out of Reach” report show that her situation is unlikely to improve any time soon. Nationally, rents are rising, wages are lagging behind, and there is a limited supply of affordable housing. With all these barriers to renting an apartment, it’s easy to see how Jane might end up doubled-up with family or friends, severely burdened by the cost of her housing, or homeless. Unless we take action to increase the supply of affordable housing units (Out of Reach suggests America needs 26.1 million more units to meet demand), increase the minimum wage, and decrease the cost of rent, Jane won’t ever be able to afford her apartment. U.S.A. Government Every Man, Women, Child Is A Criminal Need Two Go To Jail Confiscation All Personal Property And Land Etc. The Confiscation Acts of 1861 and 1862 and Today Soon 2024 As the Senate met in extraordinary session from July 4 to August 6, 1861, one of the wartime measures it considered was the Confiscation Act, designed to allow the federal government to seize property, including slave property, being used to support the Confederate rebellion. The Senate passed the final bill on August 5, 1861, by a vote 24 to 11, and it was signed into law by President Lincoln the next day. Although this bill had symbolic importance, it had little effect on the rebellion or wartime negotiations. When Congress again convened in December, Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, proposed a more comprehensive confiscation bill. On December 2, 1861, Trumbull introduced the Confiscation Act of 1862 to allow for seizure of all Confederate property, whether or not it had been used to support the rebellion. Before long, however, Trumbull's bill stalled due to ideological differences over the issue of confiscation. Radical Republicans called for a vigorous confiscation bill to seize property and free slaves, but more conservative members worried about expanding the reach of the federal government while denying property owners their constitutional rights. Early in 1862, a group of moderate senators, led by Ohio’s John Sherman, produced a compromise bill that authorized the federal government to free slaves in conquered rebel territory and prohibited the return of fugitive slaves, while allowing for confiscation of Confederate property through court action. It also allowed the Union army to recruit African American soldiers. Although more aggressive than the first act, the Confiscation Act of 1862 also lacked enforcement capabilities. Loosely enforced by the Lincoln administration, the law was actively undermined by Lincoln’s successor, President Andrew Johnson. Tracking Everything Everywhere All at Once Cell phone tracking enables you to follow the movements of a person of interest. You can track someone’s location without them knowing by installing a spy app secretly on their target phone. These phone spying apps track almost all targeted phone activities like Calls, SMS messages, Google map’s location, Web history, Social Media sites like Facebook, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Telegram, etc. ... mSpy is a GPS tracker that allows you to remotely track any user’s phone activity. Asset Forfeiture Law & How to Keep Your Property asset forfeiture laws allow the government to seize (and sometimes keep) your property when there is evidence that the property was either used in the commission of a crime, or obtained by way of criminal activity. Most types of property can be seized, including: houses, boats, cars, and money. Examples of asset forfeiture in cases we handle include: police taking ownership of several kilos of cocaine in a drug possession case. the government keeping a hunting knife that was used in an assault with a deadly weapon case. Cops taking a machine that a criminal used to make a counterfeit product. In our experience, many asset forfeitures take place in: cases involving drug crimes, and cases involving organized crimes. Note that before the government can legally forfeit property in these cases, you typically have to be convicted of a crime related to the property, and the government has to comply with certain procedural rules. Our California criminal defense attorneys will highlight the following in this article: 1. What is asset forfeiture? 2. What type of property is subject to forfeiture? 3. What safeguards are there for asset holders? 4. What about asset forfeiture in California drug cases? 5. What is asset forfeiture in organized crime cases? 1. What is asset forfeiture? Asset forfeiture is when the government takes your property because it suspects the property was either: used in committing a crime, or obtained via criminal activity. Forfeiture can only occur after a civil proceeding where the government files suit against the property itself (not you as the property owner). To win the lawsuit, the government has to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the property was connected to criminal activity. Note that while the police can seize your property before you get convicted of a crime, they usually cannot forfeit it until you are convicted of a crime. In our experience, forfeiture agents can be very sloppy and often seize property that is: misidentified as the suspect’s property or found nearby the suspect’s property but belongs to a innocent party. 1.1. How assets get seized To get control over your property allegedly connected to criminal activity, forfeiture agents will typically: take physical possession of the personal property (such as drugs, cash, cars, etc.); order banks or brokers to hold your accounts so that you cannot withdraw any money; and record notices of forfeiture on your real estate to keep you from selling, transferring, or mortgaging it. Once your property is seized, you can no longer benefit from it or control it unless the court ultimately denies forfeiture and orders the property returned to you and the legal title cleared. Handcuffs on top of cash Overzealous and intimidating forfeiture agents often go unchecked and may seize more property than they are legally entitled to. 2. What type of property is subject to forfeiture? California’s asset forfeiture laws allow police officers and prosecutors to seize most types of property. Some of the most common examples we see are: a weapon such as gun that is involved in an assault with a deadly weapon case, telecommunications or computer equipment used to commit a computer crime, such as internet fraud, animals, if you are convicted of animal abuse and cruelty, vehicles used to commit a crime, such as the transport of stolen property or distributing drugs, machines used to break the law, like using a machine to make counterfeit trademarks, illegal drugs or the machinery, land or buildings used to manufacture those drugs, and any personal or real property interest acquired through a pattern of criminal profiteering activity. In short, all assets subject to forfeiture generally fall under one of the following categories: contraband involved in the illegal activity (such as narcotics or firearms), proceeds from contraband or other illegal activities (such as cash, real estate, or other things of value), exchanges, which includes cash or other property traded for (or intended to be traded for) contraband, and facilitators, which includes items used in furtherance of criminal activity (such as a getaway car). 3. What safeguards are there for asset holders? California police used to avoid state forfeiture laws by giving seized property to federal law enforcement, which has laxer regulations. Through “equitable sharing,” the feds sold the property and kept 20%, leaving local and state agencies with 80% of the proceeds. Though the passage of Senate Bill 443 in 2016 significantly restricted “equitable sharing” and closed ways that California police can overreach and get around state forfeiture laws. Additionally, the bill increases the prosecutors’ burden of proof in certain forfeiture cases so that you have to be criminally convicted for you to lose your property. Note that the feds can still seize your property based only on probable cause, which is a far lower standard than now required in most state cases. 4. What about asset forfeiture in California drug cases? In drug cases, you generally must be convicted of an “underlying or related criminal action” before the government can forfeit your: boat, airplane, or vehicle, money or securities worth up to $40,000, and any real estate (buildings and lands). There are two exceptions to the above conviction requirement: You fail to appear in your criminal case, and the government shows that the property in question is related to the crime (called a prima facie case); or Cash or securities worth more than $40,000 can be forfeited with no conviction if the government proves by “clear and convincing evidence” that the money came from – or was going to be used for – illegal drug transactions. pile of prescription drug bottles Most California forfeitures involve drugs. 4.1. Required procedures Depending on your drug case, the government has to follow one of the following procedures before it can forfeit your property: Summary forfeiture: This is where the government can forfeit the schedule I drugs marijuana, heroin, ecstasy, LSD and peyote without any procedure of any kind. Though if the government seizes marijuana, it has to give it back if you had the right to possess it legally under California’s medical marijuana laws. Administrative forfeiture: Before the police can forfeit your personal property (no real estate) worth less than $25,000, the police must give public notice of: The property’s description, appraised value, date and location of its seizure, the facts justifying its seizure, and instructions for challenging the taking. Once notice is given, we have 30 days to challenge the seizure of property. If no challenge, the police can sell the property, and keep the proceeds. If we challenge the seizure, then judicial procedures get applied. Judicial procedures: A civil trial must be held when we have challenged the seizure of your property worth less than $25,000, or a state or local law enforcement agency has seized your property worth more than $25,000. For forfeiture to occur, the government must prove that the property was used to commit a crime or bought with money gained illegally, and you (the property owner “claimant”) were not an innocent owner and knew that a crime was being committed and agreed to it. Since asset forfeiture can get very complex – and because forfeiture agents are not lawyers – we see law enforcement make procedural mistakes all the time. We have a long track record of using these errors against the government to convince the judge to return your property. 5. What is asset forfeiture in organized crime cases? For the police to forfeit property in an organized crime case, there has to be a conviction for a crime where there was a pattern of criminal behavior done for financial gain. A pattern means that you committed two or more connected crimes. Common examples in cases we handle include: child pornography, unlawful under Penal Code 311 PC, extortion, unlawful under Penal Code 518 PC, and receiving stolen property, unlawful under Penal Code 496 PC. 5.1. Required procedures For the government to legally forfeit property in organized crime cases, the prosecutor must: file a petition with the court, give a notice of the property to anyone with an ownership interest in it, and publish a notice of the property in a local newspaper (in some cases). If you have an interest in the property, we have 30 days of receiving the notice to challenge the forfeiture. Then the court will hold a hearing and permit the forfeiture if the prosecutor can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the property is subject to forfeiture. Baggies of seized drugs on the ground Depending on the case, police can seize any property tied to a crime whether or not it is owned by a criminal suspect. Government Confiscation of Gold: Understanding the Facts Many investors have heard that the U.S. government confiscated the public's gold years ago. Is it true? Is it a rumor? Could it happen again? This is an issue that comes up time and again with gold investors. Rather than speculate, we believe it's best to consider the facts. Below is a timeline that explains exactly what happened and, more importantly, how today's investors should react and what they can do to make sure they're prepared, in case it happens again. May 1, 1933 – President Roosevelt's Executive Order 6102 required U.S. citizens to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, all but a small amount of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by them to the Federal Reserve, in exchange for $20.67 per troy ounce. Under the Trading With the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, as amended on March 9, 1933, violation of the order was punishable by fine up to $10,000 ($167,700 if adjusted for inflation as of 2010) or up to ten years in prison, or both. An exception to the order was listed in section 2 (b) “Gold coin and gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate $100 belonging to any one person; and gold coins having a recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins.” Jan 30, 1934 -- The Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934 required that all gold and gold certificates held by the Federal Reserve be surrendered and vested in the sole title of the United States Department of the Treasury and changed the value of the dollar in gold from $20.67 to $35 per ounce. 1954 - In 1954 the Treasury Department amended the Gold Regulations of the original Executive Order to enable the continuance of the exemption of rare coins from the gold confiscation provisions, and they expanded the definition of "coins" with a recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins to include "gold coin made prior to April 5th, 1933 (Federal Register 4309, 4312 1954, as codified in 31 CFR Section 54.20) Aug 15, 1971 - The price of gold remained fixed from Jan 30, 1934 until August 15, 1971, when President Nixon announced that the United States would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed value, thus abandoning the gold standard for foreign exchange. Dec 31, 1974 - On December 31, 1974, with Executive Order 11825, President Gerald Ford repealed the Executive Order that Roosevelt used to call in gold in 1933. This was necessary because on the same day Congress restored Americans' right to own gold. The limitation on gold ownership in the U.S. was repealed after President Ford signed a bill legalizing private ownership of gold coins, bars and certificates by an act of Congress codified in Pub. L 93-373 which went into effect December 31, 1974. P.L. 93-373 did not repeal the Gold Repeal Joint Resolution, which made unlawful any contracts that specified payment in a fixed amount of money or a fixed amount of gold. That is, contracts remained unenforceable if they used gold monetarily rather than as a commodity of trade. Oct 28, 1977 - 1977 Congress removed the president's authority to regulate gold transactions during a period of national emergency other than war. However, the Act of Oct. 28, 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-147, § 4(c), 91 Stat. 1227, 1229 (originally codified at 31 U.S.C. § 463 note, recodified as amended at 31 U.S.C. § 5118(d)(2)) amended the 1933 Joint Resolution and made it clear that parties could again include so-called gold clauses in contracts formed after 1977. Dec 17, 1985 – President Reagan signed into law the Gold Bullion Coin act which allowed the US Mint to produce gold coins from “newly mined domestic sources”. Gold American Eagles went on to become one of the most well known gold coins. Gold Confiscation in the Future… So the question remains; could it happen again? Who knows? Of course it is possible; it has been done before and governments in times of stress simply change the laws. As you can see above, gold bullion was forced to be sold to the government in 1933. Then in 1974, that executive order was repealed. Furthermore, in 1977, Congress removed the president’s authority to regulate gold except during a national emergency of war. It is true that numismatic collector type coins were excluded in the 1933 confiscation. Whether or not they will again be excluded in any future confiscation is completely unknown. There is a logical thought process for excluding collector coins, in that the government was trying to obtain monetary control of gold bullion. The government had no interest in rare and unusual coins of special value to collectors. However, what the government has done in the past is not necessarily indicative of what they will do in the future. Bottom line – Confiscation did happen. It was repealed, but it could happen again in the future. Laws can and do change. The History of the 1964 Silver Kennedy Half-Dollar As any numismatist can tell you, a coin that's still in circulation usually isn't worth much. The Kennedy half-dollar seems to fit this bill as well. Well, not so fast! Sure, newly minted half-dollar coins aren't worth more than their face value. Earlier editions, however, could be a different story. This is particularly true when it comes to a few special varieties that remain rare today. Want to know more about the 1964 Kennedy silver half-dollar value? Read on to learn about the history of this coin and how its price has fluctuated since its inception! Historical Background The idea for the coin came within hours of JFK's assassination. Eva Adams, director of the Mint, intended for the coin to be a tribute to the president. After the funeral, the Mint and the Treasury started discussing the details. The Kennedy family served as consultants as well. The main candidates for the new coin were the quarter, half dollar, and dollar. At the time, the Peace dollar hadn't been minted since 1935. Millions of them were still in the Treasury Department vaults. Replacing all this money would've been troublesome, so the Peace dollar fell out of the race. The issue with the quarter was that it featured George Washington. Jackie Kennedy didn't want her husband to replace another president. As such, they decided to replace the Ben Franklin half dollar. Interestingly, changing the Franklin coin required an act of Congress. The law stated that the Treasury could only change coin designs that were 25 years old. The Franklin coin was only in production for 15 years. Design and Engraving Work on the new coin began less than a week after the president's death. The plan was to start producing it in January, four weeks away. The original design was the work of Gilroy Roberts, US Mint chief engraver. At first, he believed the deadline was impossible to meet. To hasten the process, he used some existing designs as the basis for the new coin. Kennedy's presidential medal was a clear inspiration. The profile sculpture made its way to the coin's obverse (heads) side. Assistant engraver Frank Gasparro sculpted the reverse (tails) side based on the Presidential Seal. On December 13, the Philadelphia Mint produced the first half-dollar trial strikes. Roberts brought them to Washington for approval. Jackie Kennedy suggested that the hair was too pronounced, which led to a slight revision. Initial Popularity The Treasury started offering Kennedy coins on March 24, 1964. They knew that the demand would be high, so they minted no less than 90 million coins. Fairly soon, it became clear that even these lofty expectations were too low. Before the banks opened, people were already waiting in droves. Lines stretched around every block where coins were available. Banks tried to respond to high demand by limiting purchases to 40 coins per person. Despite that, customers managed to deplete the initial supply of 70,000 half-dollar coins by noon that day. Recognizing the excess demand, the Mint increased its target. Still, people continued to collect the Kennedy coins as soon as they arrived. Congress had to order the Mint to keep minting 1964-dated coins into 1965. From Silver to Copper Why were Americans so dedicated to collecting these coins? Well, Kennedy's popularity was a big part of it, but there's more to the story. See, the original 1964 Kennedy half dollar was 90% silver. Due to the excess minting, the government's stockpiles of silver started running low. This led to rising silver prices, so the half-dollar became even more popular. In response to the short supply of silver, Congress passed the Coinage Act of 1965. The act allowed the addition of copper cores to silver coins. As a result, the 1965 Kennedy half dollar had its silver content dropped to 40%. As silver prices kept rising, the Treasury soon eliminated it from use in minting. By 1971, the Kennedy coins consisted almost exclusively of copper and nickel. Over the Years In the past 59 years, the design of the coin didn't change much. The only exceptions were the special editions, such as the one in 1976. Around then, the Mint announced new designs for the half-dollar and quarter. The idea was to commemorate the 1976 United States Bicentennial. The redesign featured the Independence Hall in Philadelphia. After the high mintage of the bicentennial editions, the Kennedy coins started declining in popularity. The silver boom of 1979 didn't help, as many silver coins ended up getting melted for their metal content. In 2014, the Mint issued another special edition for the half-dollar's 50th anniversary. There were three variations: clad, silver, and .999 gold. All coins are collector's items. Value of the Coin These days, it's fairly easy to find a half-dollar in good condition. To make some money on them, you'll need to have a special edition. One interesting variety is the 1964 half-dollar with accented hair. These are the proofs struck in Philadelphia, and they feature the coin's original design. There's also the 1998 matte finish coin worth a few hundred dollars. By far, the most valuable Kennedy coin is the SMS (Special Mint Set) edition. These coins feature well-defined strikes and a satin finish. The lack of contact marks indicates someone printed these coins one at a time. Nobody knows for sure how many SMS edition coins exist. That said, as the rarest non-error Kennedy coin, this edition is very valuable. In 2019, one SMS Kennedy coin set a new record by selling for $156,000. As for the original 1964 coins, their silver content makes them a bit more valuable. That said, it's hard to get more than $10 for them unless they're in perfect condition. 36th President of the United States: 1963 ‐ 1969 Remarks at the Signing of the Coinage Act July 23, 1965 Distinguished Members of Congress, ladies and gentlemen: We are gathered here today for a very rare and historic occasion in our Nation's history. Before I make some observations that I have made note of here, I want to say to the Congress again, as I do almost daily these days, in the words of the Navy--"Well done." When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the act of 1792. And that act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States. Since that time our coinage of dimes, and quarters, and half dollars, and dollars have contained 90 percent silver. Today, except for the silver dollar, we are establishing a new coinage to take its place beside the old. My Secretary of the Treasury, Joe Fowler, is a little stingy about making samples, but I have some here. Joe made sure that I wouldn't put them in my pocket by sending them over here in plastic. Actually, no new coins can be minted until this bill is signed. So these strikes, as they are called, are coins that we will never use. On one side is our first First Lady, Martha Washington. On the other, a replica of Mount Vernon. The new dimes and the new quarters will contain no silver. They will be composites, with faces of the same alloy used in our 5-cent piece that is bonded to a core of pure copper. They will show a copper edge. Our new half dollar will continue our silver tradition. Eighty percent silver on the outside and 19 percent silver inside. It will be nearly indistinguishable in appearance from our present half dollar. All these new coins will be the same size and will bear the same designs as do their present counterparts. And they will fit all the parking meters and all the coin machines and will have the same monetary value as the present ones. Now, all of you know these changes are necessary for a very simple reason--silver is a scarce material. Our uses of silver are growing as our population and our economy grows. The hard fact is that silver consumption is now more than double new silver production each year. So, in the face of this worldwide shortage of silver, and our rapidly growing need for coins, the only really prudent course was to reduce our dependence upon silver for making our coins. If we had not done so, we would have risked chronic coin shortages in the very near future. There is no change in the penny and the nickel. There is no change in the silver dollar, although we have no present plans for silver dollar production. Some have asked whether our silver coins will disappear. The answer is very definitely-no. Our present silver coins won't disappear and they won't even become rarities. We estimate that there are now 12 billion--I repeat, more than 12 billion silver dimes and quarters and half dollars that are now outstanding. We will make another billion before we halt production. And they will be used side-by-side with our new coins. Since the life of a silver coin is about 25 years, we expect our traditional silver coins to be with us in large numbers for a long, long time. If anybody has any idea of hoarding our silver coins, let me say this. Treasury has a lot of silver on hand, and it can be, and it will be used to keep the price of silver in line with its value in our present silver coin. There will be no profit in holding them out of circulation for the value of their silver content. The new coins are not going to have a scarcity value either. The mint is geared to get into production quickly and to do it on a massive scale. We expect to produce not less than 3 1/2 billions of the new coins in the next year, and, if necessary, twice that amount in the following 12 months. So, we have come here this morning to this, the first house of the land and this beautiful Rose Garden, to congratulate all of those men and women that make up our fine Congress, who made this legislation possible--the committees of both Houses, the leadership in both Houses, both parties, and Secretary Fowler and all of his associates in the Treasury. I commend the new coinage to the Nation's banks and businesses and to the public. I think it will serve us well. Now, I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th century. And to those Members of Congress, who are here on this very historic occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th century we have no idea of returning to it. We are going to keep our eyes on the stars and our feet on the ground. Note: The President spoke at 11:21 a.m. in the Rose Garden at the White House. During his remarks he referred to Henry H. Fowler, Secretary of the Treasury. As enacted, the Coinage Act of 1965 is Public Law 89-81 (79 Stat. 254). On October 30, 1965, the White House announced that circulation of the new 25-cent piece would begin on November 1. The White House release stated in part, "The new--nonsilver--quarter dollar will be added to the circulation of the traditional 90 percent silver quarter. Both the old and the new quarters are to circulate together. "Approximately 230 million pieces of the new quarter will be distributed during the week beginning November 1. Initial distribution will be backed by production that will rise from 28 million to 60 million pieces a week during November, and will be still higher thereafter." The Greatest Silver Dollar Hoard in History The greatest silver hoard in U.S. history was stored in Washington, D.C., at the U.S. Treasury. Inside the massive vaults of the U.S. Treasury were 360,000 bags of Silver Dollars and each bag contained 1,000 coins. This meant 360 million silver dollars were never distributed by the Treasury and sat for decades in the Treasury vaults. An additional 620 million silver dollars were held in banks across the United States. The American public was content with easy-to-fold paper currency; they didn’t want these big, bulky silver coins in their purses and pockets. During the 1930s and into the 1950s, the price of silver remained stable, so the demand for silver dollars in the U. S. Treasury was slim. Remember, the Treasury was redeeming their Silver Certificates for U.S. silver dollars. Each silver dollar contains a little over 3/4 of an ounce of pure silver. But as the price of silver rose, the demand from dealers and collectors increased as well. Dealers and coin collectors from across the country came to Washington to buy silver dollars at face value from the Treasury. Some lucky dealers and collectors received rare dates or in uncirculated condition, while some got coins that were only valued for their silver content. Many members of the public bought every coin they could afford in hopes of “striking it rich” by getting coins that were more valuable than their silver content. Indeed, some members of the public did receive coins worth hundreds of dollars and their stories were widely repeated. From 1958 to 1963, nearly 90 million silver dollars were purchased from the Treasury. By March 1964, nearly 26 million silver dollars were removed from the U.S. Treasury’s vaults. Later U.S. Government Sold A Total 982 million Uncirculated Morgan and Peace Dollars Sold By U.S. Treasury’s Vaults. Collecting Silver Dollars Is A Joke Because They Are Not Rare At ALL. On March 26, 1964, the Treasurer of the United States put an end to the long lines and hopeful prospects. Collectors, who were now aware of the nearly 3 million Carson City coins still unsold by the Treasury, demanded they also be sold. But they would have to wait eight years for the first General Services Administration auctions of Carson City silver dollars to begin. Silver dollars are among the most popular coins that collectors buy. These large silver coins are valuable both for their numismatic significance and their silver content. While the last circulating 90 percent United States silver dollar coins were struck in 1935, several million 40 percent silver dollars were made at the San Francisco Mint from 1971 through 1976. Since 1983, the United States Mint has struck an array of commemorative 90 percent silver dollars and in 1986 introduced the 0.999-fine American Silver Eagle bullion one-dollar coins, though none of these legal-tender pieces are intended for circulation. Here’s a brief look at all of the various silver dollars that the United States Mint has produced over the decades: Early Silver Dollars – Made from 1794 through 1803, the early silver dollar coins are highly scarce and quite expensive. Flowing Hair silver dollars, made in 1794 and 1795, represent the first design type of the silver dollar coin and cost about $2,200 and up for a specimen grading Good-4. Common examples of the Draped Bust silver dollar type, most widely recognized by the rare, multi-million-dollar 1804 Draped Bust dollar (a special presentation piece that was actually produced in 1834), cost $1,000 and up for a Good-4 specimen. The Flowing Hair and Draped Bust silver dollars were both designed by Robert Scot. Liberty Seated Dollars – Christian Gobrecht’s classic Seated Liberty design, seen on most U.S. silver denominations in the 19th century, graced the dollar coin from 1840 through 1873. These coins are very scarce in original condition and are priced at about $300 and up for a “common” Good-4 specimen. Trade Silver Dollars – These silver dollar coins, not intended for circulation in the U.S., were designed by William Barber and struck from 1873 through 1885. They were primarily produced for trade with Asia. The most common Trade dollars sell for around $150 and up in a grade of Very Good-8, and many pieces are covered by “chop marks,” or insignias that were counterstamped onto the coins by various Eastern merchants. Morgan Silver Dollars – By far the most popular silver dollar type, Morgan silver dollars (officially known as the “Liberty Head silver dollar”) were designed by George T. Morgan and were produced from 1878 through 1904, and again in 1921. Morgan dollars are commonly sold to non-collectors and junk silver investors, though their most enthusiastic market is found among hobbyists who collect one of each date and mintmark variety. While common Morgan dollars can be bought for a small premium over their current silver spot value, some Morgan silver dollars, such as the rare Carson City Mint specimens, sell for hundreds and even thousands of dollars each. Peace Silver Dollars – In 1921, Anthony de Francisci designed the Peace dollar, which shows a head of Miss Liberty similar to that on the Statue of Liberty in New York. Like Morgan dollars, Peace silver dollars have a wide collecting base, though the run of this series was much shorter. Made only until 1935, the Peace dollar is a relatively common type, with some pieces selling for a small amount over their silver spot value. Scarcer Peace dollars, such as the 1921 and 1928 silver dollars, are worth hundreds. Eisenhower Silver Dollars – Regular-issue Eisenhower dollars struck for circulation are actually made from a copper-nickel composition, though the United States Mint did make a limited number of 40 percent silver dollars in both uncirculated and proof varieties at the San Francisco Mint. These 40 percent silver Eisenhower dollars were made from 1971 through 1976, and some sell for less than $10. The Eisenhower dollar series ended in 1978 and was followed by the Susan B. Anthony dollar coins in 1979. All Susan B. Anthony dollars are made from a copper-nickel clad composition. Collecting silver dollars can be a lot of fun and doesn’t have to be an expensive venture. One of the most affordable ways to sample everything that U.S. silver dollars have to offer is to build a silver dollar type set, which would include one example of each coin mentioned above. Such a coin collecting goal would cost at least $1,700 to $2,000 and makes a beautiful assemblage of some of America’s finest and most important coins. The Truth about the UNs Agenda 2030 — What You Need to Know We live in a world of misinformation, and it is hard to sort fact from fiction—even more so when the facts are distorted. With misinformation coming our way day and night, we’ve got to decipher the truth. Once we have the actual facts, it is up to each of us to determine how it affects us and the world around us. “Agenda 2030” – the central United Nations platform for sustainable development — is a perfect case in point. It contains 17 goals that 193 member states (including the U.S.) pledged to ensure. It is a convoluted, wordy document that focuses on the idea of a global partnership to eradicate issues relating to global human rights, poverty, and the environment. Rather than just picking up on sound bites, here is the truth about Agenda 2030, straight from the original sources (The United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs). Use this information to form your own opinion. The Basics Facts of Agenda 2030 The Heads of State and Government and High Representatives met at the United Nations Headquarters in New York September 25-27, 2015, to create new global Sustainable Development Goals. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2015. You can read it in its entirety here. The 2030 Agenda has 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets. According to the UN, “All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. […] The Goals and targets will stimulate action over the next fifteen years in areas of critical importance for humanity and the planet.” In the 2030 Agenda Declaration, the UN declares, “On behalf of the peoples we serve, we have adopted a historic decision on a comprehensive, far-reaching and people-centred set of universal and transformative Goals and targets. We commit ourselves to working tirelessly for the full implementation of this Agenda by 2030.” It is important to note that Agenda 2030 was written in 2015, well before COVID-19. However, the UN has a COVID-19 Response for the Sustainable Development Goals and is pushing Agenda 2030 in the wake of the pandemic, which may explain why you are hearing about it more often now. The UN’s COVID-19 Response website says, “The pandemic is an unprecedented wake-up call, laying bare deep inequalities and exposing precisely the failures that are addressed in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on climate change. Leveraging this moment of crisis, when usual policies and social norms have been disrupted, bold steps can steer the world back on track towards the Sustainable Development Goals. This is the time for change, for a profound systemic shift to a more sustainable economy that works for both people and the planet. The Sustainable Development Goals are vital for a recovery that leads to greener, more inclusive economies, and stronger, more resilient societies.” The 5 Ps of Agenda 2030 So, what exactly does the United Nations plan to do with Agenda 2030? According to The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Primer, “At the heart of the 2030 Agenda are five critical dimensions: people, prosperity, planet, partnership and peace, also known as the 5P’s.” People: To end poverty and hunger for all. Planet: To protect the planet from degradation. Prosperity: To ensure “all human beings can enjoy prosperous and fulfilling lives and that economic, social and technological progress occurs in harmony with nature.” Peace: To foster peaceful and inclusive societies. Partnership: To strengthen global solidarity. The 17 Goals of Agenda 2030 In order to achieve the 5 Ps, 17 Sustainable Goals were created by the United Nations. Here are the goals directly from the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere. Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all. Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all. Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation. Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries. Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development. Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss. Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development. Keep in mind that each goal also contains several targets, as well. For example, Goal 2 includes, “2.1: By 2030, end hunger and ensure access by all people, in particular the poor and people in vulnerable situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious and sufficient food all year round.” Goal 16 includes, “16.9: By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.” There are 169 targets total, all of which break down goals in this way. Implementation of Agenda 2030 Lofty goals like these require lots of action, and Agenda 2030 is not lacking in calls for governments to “act.” The Agenda repeatedly refers to the Financing for Development Outcome Document as a major part of the action plan for achieving goals. While it’s hard to say how “actionable” the declarations in the Outcome Document actually are, they shine a light on the priorities and mindset of the groups writing the Agenda. Taken directly from the Document itself, these include: Expanding Taxation “We commit to enhancing revenue administration through modernized, progressive tax systems, improved tax policy and more efficient tax collection. We will work to […] broaden the tax base. […] We welcome efforts by countries to set nationally defined domestic targets and timelines for enhancing domestic revenue as part of their national sustainable development strategies and will support developing countries in need in reaching these targets.” Empowering the IMF and World Bank to Access Financial Information “To help to combat illicit flows, we invite the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the United Nations to assist both source and destination countries. We also invite appropriate international institutions and regional organizations to publish estimates of the volume and composition of illicit financial flows […] [W]e will encourage information-sharing among financial institutions to mitigate the potential impact of the anti-money-laundering and combating the financing of terrorism standard on reducing access to financial services.” Strengthening Regulations on Private Business to Achieve “Public Goals” “We will develop policies and, where appropriate, strengthen regulatory frameworks to better align private sector incentives with public goals, including incentivizing the private sector to adopt sustainable practices, and foster long-term quality investment.” Growing Services for Immigrants in Their Host Countries “We recognize the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development in countries of origin and transit and destination countries […] We will work to ensure that adequate and affordable financial services are available to migrants and their families in both home and host countries.” Footing a 100-Billion Dollar Annual Bill for “Clean Energy” “We will promote both public and private investment in energy infrastructure and clean energy technologies […] with a combined potential to raise over $100 billion in annual investments by 2020.” There are many other action items in the document. Click here to see them all. The Concern regarding Agenda 2030 If we’re being honest, there is quite a lot of mistrust when it comes to Washington or the United Nations. We have seen firsthand how FEMA has failed to save us in times of crisis. So, when looking at this giant agenda that is full of hyperbolic language, it is easy to see why some people don’t trust it. How is the UN going to “end poverty in all its forms everywhere” by 2030? It just doesn’t seem that possible given their track record. Moreover, the language used in Agenda 2030 has some worried it is presenting a “New World Order.” This is because it uses all-encompassing language, such as “for all” and emphasizes the need for a global partnership. Instead of the United States of America, people are fearful that our own current laws will cease to exist if we continue to hand U.S. sovereignty over to an international government. However, according to the United Nations, “The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are not legally binding. Nevertheless, countries are expected to take ownership and establish a national framework for achieving the 17 Goals.” Prepare Now for Agenda 2030 Issues Take time to read Agenda 2030 and the Financing for Development Outcome Document in full and form your own opinion. While the goals may seem all fine and good, we’re all familiar with the phrase, “No good deed goes unpunished.” As danger in the world grows and concern for our government handing over its independence continues, it is always important to practice preparedness. Learn basic survival skills, develop relationships with people you can trust, purchase land, stock up on food supplies, and stay aware. Don’t rely on the government or the United Nations to save the world. Learn how to save yourself, friends. UN Report Calls For Decriminalization Of Sex Between Adults/Children Age 8+Up https://rumble.com/v2qo62c-un-report-calls-for-decriminalization-of-sex-between-adultschildren-age-8-u.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230416234047/https://icj2.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/8-MARCH-Principles-FINAL-printer-version-1-MARCH-2023.pdf Back to Agenda 21 The Deliberate LIE of the story of “saving the environment” – which is actually being destroyed by these same Elitist Jews, not the population of the world – is nothing but a “cover” story to keep the people in the dark while the “Plan” proceeds at break-neck speed. After all, if people caught on to the truth of what is going on, they might make some attempt to survive! This is nothing less than blatant, RAW, Communism! And we, the people, are paying for it. Cities, towns, and states are being seduced into destroying their own rights, and the rights of their fellow Americans, by federal grants and “easy” money to implement these diabolical plans. Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn’t care less whether it’s called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department in 2009. It proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights: Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods “Balanced” means putting prostitutes, drug addicts, street people, gang members, etc. as tenants in the same buildings with middle class families. This has been going on in San Francisco for years. Upper middle class Americans bought up-scale condominiums in up-scale high rise buildings in San Francisco only to see the City give HUGE subsidies (sometimes paying as much as $4,000 per month) to put these indigent people in the same building. Their goal? To destroy the value of the condominiums owned by the upper middle class thereby destroying the largest investment they owned. The indigent people who were put in these buildings at great expense to the city would defecate in the elevators and in the hallways, leave trash everywhere, put graffiti all over everything inside and outside the building, buy and sell dope on the property, bring their thug friends into the building, and do everything possible to make the decent tenants miserable and frightened. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/publication/download_pdf/Growing-Smart-Legislative-Guidebook.pdf https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/full-report.pdf https://rumble.com/v2yky8g-this-is-un-4g3nda-21-aw4reness-is-the-first-step-in-the-r3slst4nc3-by-the-p.html Agenda 21 and 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development. It was adopted by more than 178 countries at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992.

True Titles Of Nobility Our early legislators were so concerned regarding the "still" close relationship with the British Crown hence Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which is included in the Constitution. The Titles of Nobility Amendment was proposed in 1810 and submitted to the states for ratification. By early 1812, eleven states had ratified the amendment. However, it required ratification by thirteen states to become part of the Constitution. On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811), New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it. The amendment would have stripped United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power". It was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland and passed by Congress on May 1, 1810. The amendment was intended to prevent U.S. citizens from accepting titles of nobility from foreign powers, reflecting concerns about European influence on the young republic. The amendment's text states: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Despite claims by some individuals known as "Thirteenthers" that the amendment was actually ratified and became part of the Constitution, official records and communications from the U.S. government confirm that it did achieve the necessary ratifications to become law. http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! In 1789 Senator Tristrain Dalton (MA) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for ANY American accepting a "title of nobility" (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn't passed, this was the first time a "title of nobility" amendment was proposed. 1810 - 1810 - twenty years after the original suggestion of an Amendment referring to "title of Nobility", Senator Reed proposed another "Title of Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Understanding the reasoning behind the Original 13th Amendment is very important. Even in the 1700 & 1800's, most of our federally elected representatives and senators were lawyers by profession. It is true, the principle intent of the Original 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in the government. When first reading the Original 13th Amendment, with its references to "nobility", "honour", "emperor", "king" would lead most to dismiss the amendment as a petty document carrying no weight. In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment. The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by 12: 1. Maryland (December 25, 1810) 2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811) 3. Ohio (January 31, 1811) 4. Delaware (February 2, 1811) 5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811) 6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811) 7. Vermont (October 24, 1811) 8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811) 9. Georgia (November 22, 1811) 10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811) 11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812) 12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812) 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/original-13th-amendment1.html http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf The Move to 'Restore' the 13th Amendment. If there is an aspect of the human condition that is unaddressed by the platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, adopted last month at the state convention in Des Moines, you'd have to look awfully hard to find it. Its 387 enumerated planks and principles range widely over politics, culture, and economics, from sweeping statements of belief ("America is good") to the fine nuances of agricultural policy ("We support the definition of manure as natural fertilizer") and touching on the mythical "North American Union" (against) and the gold standard (for). Even so, it's a little startling to come upon section 7.19, which calls for "the reintroduction and ratification of the original 13th Amendment, not the 13th amendment in today's Constitution." Since the existing 13th Amendment bans slavery, while the "original" one was about something else entirely, the wording might give the impression that Iowa Republicans wish to reverse emancipation, which is not at all the case, according to state GOP Communications Director Danielle Plogmann. Like many aspects of Republican politics this year, it's actually about embarrassing President Obama. But you have to wonder whether the delegates knew what they were getting into. In making common cause with "Thirteenthers," as those who seek to restore the long-lost amendment are known, the party has ventured beyond the far fringes of conspiracy theory, into a mysterious lost land without lawyers or taxes. Maybe they knew what they were doing after all. Return with us now to the tumultuous years leading up to the War of 1812, when fear of "foreign influence"—by England or France, depending on whether you were a Republican or Federalist—was a dominating issue in American politics. Jerome Bonaparte, the younger brother of Napoleon, had recently spent several years in the United States, where he married Elizabeth Patterson, the beautiful, ambitious daughter of a wealthy Baltimore merchant. In 1810, Jerome was on the throne of Westphalia, while Elizabeth was in America with their son, Jerome Napoleon. (The couple would never see each other again.) According to historian Michael Vorenberg of Brown University, having a nephew of the emperor of France growing up on American soil might have made the pro-British Federalists uneasy, or, just as likely, suggested to them a way to tie the Republicans to the French Legion of Honor, the Trilateral Commission of its day. Desiring to get out in front of the issue—or possibly seeking to score points against the Federalists, who had their own embarrassing ties to the British aristocracy—Republican Sen. Philip Reed of Maryland introduced an amendment meant to strengthen the existing "emoluments clause" in Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution. This clause reads: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." Reed's proposed amendment extended the ban from office-holders to "any citizen of the United States" and made the penalty loss of citizenship: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Reed's bill passed both houses easily, and as of Dec. 9, 1812, had been ratified by 12 states and seemed headed for adoption, at which point war intervened. Here, histories diverge. The mainstream view is that the "Titles of Nobility Amendment" (TONA) never achieved the necessary 13 ratifications—three quarters of the 17 states as of 1810—and fell further behind as more states joined the union. That ought to have been the end of it, says Jol A. Silversmith, a lawyer in private practice who has written the definitive account of the "missing amendment." And so it was until the 1980s, when a conspiracy-minded researcher named David Dodge came across an 1825 copy of the Constitution including this provision. Further research led Dodge to conclude that TONA had been ratified by Virginia no later than 1819 and was an accepted, if largely unnoted, part of the Constitution from then until its mysterious disappearance around the time of the Civil War. If you find it hard to believe that an amendment to the Constitution could have been in effect for four decades and then mysteriously excised and forgotten, well, the times were different. There was no single reference copy of the Constitution to which scribes with quill pens ceremoniously added amendments as they were ratified. Dodge claims to have turned up numerous pre–Civil War copies of the Constitution containing the missing amendment, but that doesn't add up to proof. Even Congress was confused about the status of TONA and requested clarification from President James Monroe, who turned the question over to Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, who reported that it had not been ratified. The evidence that Virginia ever did approve TONA is circumstantial, but, as Silversmith points out, it's also irrelevant, because already by April 30, 1812, with the admission of Louisiana, ratification required 14 states (of 18). To hang the argument on what Virginia may have done in 1819 assumes that adoption required ratification only by three quarters of the states in the union at the time the amendment was submitted in 1810, i.e., 13 of 17. That view has had its adherents over the centuries, but apart from its inherent illogic—surely the high hurdle the Founding Fathers erected to Constitutional amendments wasn't meant to shrink as the country grew—we now have a clear precedent that establishes the opposite. That's the 27th Amendment (on Congressional pay), which was proposed in 1789 but was deemed ratified only in 1992 when it was passed by 38 states—three quarters of 50, not of 13. In the world of the Thirteenthers, though, it's all a conspiracy, and the leading suspects are those shady characters who put "esquire" after their names. To quote the Web site Constitutional Concepts, "This Amendment was for the specific purpose of banning participation in government operations by attorneys and bankers who claimed the Title of Nobility of 'Esquire.' These people had joined the International Bar Association or the International Bankers Association and owed their allegiance to the King of England." In other words—well, we're not sure how to explain it any better, but Constitutional Concepts CEO Jim Barrus says in an e-mail that enforcement of the 13th Amendment would strike a blow against "the elected politicians who have grand plans of ruling every facet of America," and would essentially delegitimize virtually every act of the federal government since 1819. Who wouldn't want that? Naturally, most lawyers see it differently. "The esquire thing is ridiculous," says R. B. Bernstein, a professor at New York Law School and author of Amending America. "'Esquire' is not a title of nobility. Back then, they were worried about people accepting literal titles of aristocracy that convey land or privileges, things you can leave to your kids." Lawyers obviously command certain privileges, but they are not inherited. There are, of course, other implications of Thirteenthism, such as ensuring that the United States never again suffers the humiliation of having a president win the Nobel Peace Prize. That was just what the Iowa Republicans had in mind, according to Plogmann, who wrote in an e-mail that the plank "was meant to make a statement about the delegates' opinion about Mr. Obama receiving the prize." (Presumably they didn't mind if, in the process, they were also making a statement about any American scientist or writer unlucky enough to win a Nobel.) Unfortunately for them, the Department of Justice looked into whether Obama needed Congressional approval to accept the Nobel under the existing emoluments clause, and based on the meaning of "foreign state" (which would not cover the Nobel Prize Committee) concluded that he did not. But they could be playing with fire. "We're in a constitutional silly season," says Bernstein, "and whether you are of the left or the right, if you take the Constitution seriously, it's very troubling." The threat posed by the 13th Amendment is remote; as far as can be determined, no other state has followed the Iowa GOP in calling for ratification, and no bill of ratification has been introduced into the Iowa legislature. As far as their platform goes, we should all be willing to defer to Iowa Republicans on the definition of manure as natural fertilizer. So long as they keep it on the fields, where it belongs. http://www.thirdamendment.com/8SCIDLJ577.pdf The case of the missing 13th amendment to the Constitution. Republicans claimed the legitimate 13th Amendment to the Constitution was “missing.” The debate is part of a historical detective story with some surprising twists that is still taking place.The Daily Beast did a fairly extensive feature on the missing amendment in 2010, which didn’t feature a cloaked Freemason stealing the amendment because it had a secret treasure map printed on it. Instead, the debate between historians and conspiracy buffs is about an amendment that was almost ratified in 1812 that would have been the 13th Amendment, bumping back the current 13th Amendment--which was ratified on this day in 1865 and abolished slavery--to the position of the 14th Amendment. Writer Jerry Adler’s 2010 explanation of the “Thirteenthers” controversy is pretty detailed and covers both sides of the issue—which isn’t new but got a big burst of publicity thanks to the Iowa GOP’s 2010 platform. The Iowa Republicans didn’t want the current 13th Amendment banned; they just wanted the “original” one reintroduced for approval. That "missing" proposal was called the “Titles of Nobility Amendment” (or TONA). It sought to ban any American citizen from receiving any foreign title of nobility or receiving foreign favors, such as a pension, without congressional approval. The penalty was loss of citizenship. It was an extension of Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which doesn’t allow a public office holder to receive a foreign title or similar honors without the consent of Congress. Today, the idea of a constitutional controversy about the royals may seem kind of silly, but in 1812, the United States was fighting the British and had a rocky relationship with France. The fear of both nations using noble titles as bribes, along with pensions from a foreign government, was persistent. And both the Senate and the House easily passed the TONA and passed it on to the states. By late 1812, a total of 12 states had approved the 13th Amendment and ironically, it needed a 13th state to become ratified. As the War of 1812 escalated, the TONA faded away as an issue and was never ratified. Or so we think. In the 1980s, Adler says a researcher started finding copies of the Constitution from the pre-Civil War era that had TONA listed as the 13th Amendment. The premise was that Virginia’s legislature had approved the amendment in 1819, but somehow, it was never listed as accepted by the federal government. Further research revealed that President James Monroe asked his Secretary of State, John Quincy Adams, to confirm that the TONA was never ratified, which he did. A law journal article from 1999 by Jol A. Silversmith, an attorney, explains how the TONA appeared in widely published versions of the Constitution for more than 30 years, including the official United States Statutes at Large (an official compilation of laws published by the government in 1815). His well-documented article of the “missing” amendment has more than 200 footnotes and a lot of interesting stories about how the Founding Fathers couldn’t keep track of new amendments they had just passed. As the story goes, the editor of the 1815 book of statutes, John Colvin, couldn’t determine if the TONA amendment has been ratified, so he included it in the book with an explanatory note. Then, an official version of the Constitution was given to Congressional members that included the TONA as the 13th Amendment, as an apparent misprint. That triggered a request for Monroe and Adams to verify that the amendment hadn’t been ratified. The United States Statutes at Large wasn’t reprinted until 1845, so the mistake became part of textbooks, state publications, and newspapers, Silversmith said, for decades. So a whole generation of Americans lived during a time when the “phantom” 13th Amendment existed, in some publications. (And with any kind of luck, you can probably find a TONA version of the Constitution at a flea market.) Silversmith also said Virginia's Senate rejected the TONA on February 14, 1811, based upon information in its records. But an official letter or note from the Virginia legislature couldn't be found several years later. But how could the Founding Fathers and their heirs become so confused by a handful of amendments? President John Adams waited three years to acknowledge the 11th Amendment as law, and it took Secretary of State James Madison (the "Father of the Constitution") three months to recognize the 12th Amendment as an effective law. Part of the issue was the lack of a process for states to communicate to the federal government that they had voted in favor of an amendment. Also, the number of states kept changing, which added more confusion to the ratification process. Today, TONA supporters have made several legal challenges to get the “original” 13th Amendment recognized. The issue hasn’t been taken up by the Supreme Court, and Silversmith wrote that a 2005 U.S. district court ruling said that based on Article V of the Constitution, the inclusion of TONA in published documents doesn’t make it an amendment. That hasn’t kept the debate over TONA off the Internet, as there are many websites that claim it is the legitimate 13th Amendment. And there is no expiration date for the TONA amendment, which means that it can be introduced to 35 more states that didn’t vote on it originally. It may seem that preposterous that an amendment from the early 1800s could still become a law today, but the 27th Amendment was proposed in 1789 and finally approved in 1992. The Missing Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Since the ratification of the Constitution, thousands of constitutional amendments have been proposed, but only 27 have survived the process of Article V. Out of these, the most well known are the first 10, also known as the Bill of Rights. Interestingly, 12 amendments were originally proposed, including one on congressional compensation. This proposal later became our 27th amendment, which celebrates its 20th anniversary today. This amendment boasts the longest ratification process of any amendment—200 years! Under the Compensation Clause, Congress has the power to control its own salary. The Anti-Federalists and others at the state-ratifying conventions rightly objected to the danger of allowing this power. In response, James Madison proposed a compensation amendment stating that pay increases would apply only to the next Congress. It read: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.” This change allowed the voters to force Congress to justify their pay increases through an election. Both the House and Senate approved the proposal and sent it (along with 11 other proposed amendments) to the states. The states ratified only 10 of these, now known as the Bill of Rights, but the compensation amendment remained in limbo until the 1980s. In the early 1980s, a Texas undergraduate student’s term paper renewed the ratification effort. Arguing that the amendment’s ratification was still pending, the student raised support across the country on the amendment’s behalf. At the beginning of his campaign, only seven states had ratified the amendment, but thanks to his efforts, Michigan became the final 38th state to ratify the amendment in 1992. Not only do his efforts illustrate how one citizen can make a difference in the political process, but it also ensures that Congress remains accountable to the people. https://www.newsweek.com/move-restore-13th-amendment-74391 This One Also Is Most Important Video You’ll Ever Watch Today In 2025. America's Shocking True Secret Political History & Great American Real Sovereign Citizens - https://rumble.com/v5iytz9-americas-shocking-true-secret-political-history-and-great-american-real-sov.html Yes We The People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed America's Shocking True Secret Political History And As A Great American You Are The Real Sovereign Citizens Of U.S.A. Right Now America's Shocking Secret Political History. https://dn720005.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-great-american-adventure_202203/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2024 People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/playlists/ahtzhGqa5vE We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/v2ef8n2-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-and-international-maritime-admi.html As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html It was February 21, 1871 that the 41st US Congress sold out the Republic. On this date, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." Also known as the "Act of 1871." Congress, illegally acting on it's own behalf, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. Congress realizing that our country was in severe financial difficulty, cut a deal with the international bankers, in the process incurring a debt to those bankers. The international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city. The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated. The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the 1871 Organic Act. People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. THIS VIDEO IS SAFE TO WATCH but do not click or link To (( anticorruptionsociety )) Talked About In This Video At All... The U.S.A. Government Add A Computer Virus - Your Computer Has Been Locked - To Source Documents In This Video To Stop You! Thanks From The New World Order ! How Can We Stop or Start To Build An Anti Corruption Society ? A society is built on a structure that must have certain principles to stand firm and strong on the grounds of culture, ethics, and morality. In terms of the mentioned aspects, corruption is undoubtedly one evil that should be eliminated from a thriving society. Moreover, corruption is a factor in the system and exists in all cultures, but this phenomenon has only begun to be seriously discussed in the last 20 years. Several heavily pro-corruption reforms and initiatives have indeed been proclaimed effective, but still, no state so far has managed to control corruption through global support requirements. What is Corruption and Where Does it Exist ? Basically, corruption is the misuse of privileged status in any of the departments of government (judicial, executive and legislative) or in governmental or other organizations for the purpose of acquiring personal benefits that are not flagrantly unconstitutional for themselves or else. The culture of corruption, however, is in stark contradiction to the earliest stages of law-making as well as the state and had been regarded as immoral in the ancient times, negatively impacting the public institutions and the flourishing of the political structure. Oath Of Allegiance For New People's Republic Of United State Of America Act Today. - "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Arm Forces of the United States when required by law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." From: How to become a U S citizen by Sally Schreudin 5th Ed. (For what should be in an oath, read 8 U.S.C.A. §1448.) This is the oath that people take to become US citizens, the underlined clause is interesting, sounds like voluntary servitude. This gives a guide as to what has to be in an oath, the rejection of former allegiances with the pledge of fidelity to the nation of choice. No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government Today & Link To Top Info Wars Video's - https://rumble.com/v4w7sxh-no-oaths-of-office-in-the-federal-government-today-and-link-to-top-info-war.html No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government And Are Enemies Destroying US Government From Within As Planned On January 10th Of 1963, Forty Five Current Communist Goals Were Submitted To The Congressional Record. Number Thirteen Was, “Do Away With Loyalty Oaths.” Know One In U.S. Government Have Signed And Or Notarized Copy Or Certified Copy Of Their Oath Of Office For Over 60 Years Now. The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Any information you provide to the Republic for the United States of America is kept strictly private, unless you have given express written permission for any of those details to be made public. Contact details are used to keep you updated by email or other electronic message. If you provide a phone number or mailing address it may be distributed to a contact in your State for purposes of keeping you informed of local assemblies or a personal contact to answer any questions you may have about assisting with the restoration of the republic. Your information is never rented or sold or otherwise released for any purpose. The Assassination of John F. Kennedy John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, was assassinated on November 22, 1963, in Dallas, Texas. He was shot while riding in an open-top car in a motorcade through Dealey Plaza. The President was struck by multiple bullets, with one bullet hitting him in the head, causing fatal injuries. Key Dates November 22, 1963: John F. Kennedy is assassinated in Dallas, Texas November 24, 1963: Lee Harvey Oswald is shot and killed by Jack Ruby November 29, 1963: President Lyndon B. Johnson appoints the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination December 9, 1963: The Warren Commission receives the FBI’s report on the investigation 1964: The Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act are passed, partially as a tribute to Kennedy’s legacy According to the search results, the “silver standard” was defined in the Coinage Act of 1792, which created the U.S. Mint and established the dollar relative to silver, not gold. The U.S. was on a gold standard from 1879 to 1933, except for an embargo on gold exports during World War I. The country went off the gold standard on June 5, 1933, when Congress enacted a joint resolution nullifying the right of creditors to demand payment in gold. The United States officially abandoned the silver standard in 1935, when China and Hong Kong stopped using it in favor of the gold standard. However, the U.S. had already taken steps away from the silver standard earlier. In 1873, the Coinage Act removed the United States from the silver standard and transitioned to a gold standard. The U.S. officially untethered itself from the gold standard in 1933, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt took the country off the gold standard. The last ties between the dollar and gold were cut in 1971, when President Richard Nixon announced that the U.S. would no longer back the dollar with gold reserves. The U.S. Mint continued to produce silver coins, including the Morgan dollar and the Peace dollar, until 1935. However, the value of silver in these coins was no longer tied to its value as a standard for currency. The U.S. finally stopped producing silver coins in 1964, when the Coinage Act of 1965 eliminated the silver content from circulating coins. This marked the end of the U.S. silver coin standard. In summary, the U.S. had a silver coin standard from 1792 to 1873, and then again from 1878 to 1935, with a brief period of reduced silver content from 1935 to 1964. The U.S. finally eliminated silver from its coins in 1965. Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110, signed on June 4, 1963, did not demonetize silver. Instead, it authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to continue printing silver certificates during the transition period. The order allowed the Secretary to issue silver certificates if needed, as part of President Kennedy’s plan to eliminate silver certificates. The order also repealed the Silver Purchase Act of 1934 and related laws, repealed a tax on silver transfers, and authorized the Federal Reserve to issue one- and two-dollar bills, in addition to the notes they were already issuing. The Silver Purchase Act had authorized and required the Secretary of the Treasury to buy silver and issue silver certificates. Executive Order 11110, signed by President John F. Kennedy on June 4, 1963, is a topic of controversy. According to some sources, this order returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve. However, it is essential to note that the Federal Reserve is a private entity, and the U.S. government does not have the authority to issue currency without going through it. It is crucial to understand that the Federal Reserve is a central bank created by Congress to regulate the nation’s monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 granted the Federal Reserve the authority to issue Federal Reserve notes, which are the primary medium of exchange in the United States. In essence, Executive Order 11110 did not give the U.S. government the power to issue currency without going through the Federal Reserve. Instead, it returned to the Treasury Department the authority to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury. This order did not alter the Federal Reserve’s role in the monetary system. In conclusion, Executive Order 11110 did not tell a lie, but it was misinterpreted by some as giving the U.S. government the power to issue currency without going through the Federal Reserve. Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick. - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... Sept. 9/11 Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers World Trade Center - https://rumble.com/v3gu5z4-sept.-911-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-towers-world-trade-cen.html https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001. This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? - https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical - https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition - https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now - https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html CIA Mind Control and CIA Secret Experiments use of biological and chemical materials. - https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html AOC Celebrate Restarting MK-Ultra Program With Progress Psychedelics Treatment. - https://rumble.com/v3045j8-aoc-celebrate-restarting-mk-ultra-program-with-progress-psychedelics-treatm.html The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). New World Order National Anthem The Ostrich Lyrics By Steppenwolf 1968 A.C.E. ! - https://rumble.com/v3yl8xx-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html The survey indicated that 85% of troops who received an anthrax shot had an adverse reaction, a rate far higher than the 30% claimed by the manufacturer in 2000, when the survey was conducted. Sixteen percent of the survey respondents had either left the military or changed their status, at least in part because of the vaccination program. Pedophile Bill Gates Is Lying To You On Vaccine Patent Protection # WO2020060606A1 - https://rumble.com/v2bvqos-pedophile-bill-gates-is-lying-to-you-on-vaccine-patent-protection-wo2020060.html The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (brand name: Comirnaty) was granted full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in August 2021 for people ages 16 and older. It was the first COVID-19 vaccine to receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization. Gates from Hell - Like you Never Knew Him (Bill Gates) Before ? Corbett Report - https://rumble.com/v2afwv2-gates-from-hell-like-you-never-knew-him-bill-gates-before-corbett-report-w0.html The technology would enable instant tracking and access to a person’s medical history. COVID-19 Vaccines Will Kill You? Animation What Happens If You Get Coronavirus Effect - https://rumble.com/v2dt6zk-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-you-animation-what-happens-if-you-get-coronavir.html No question that the mRNA vaccines should be withdrawn with immediate effect” An independent analysis of the accumulated Yellow Card data, finally released 18 months after the first FOI request, shows unequivocal safety signals linking the mRNA vaccines to serious damage to the lymph system, the heart, and female reproduction 'Health regulator failing to keep public protected from mRNA shots' IN the UK, three Covid-19 vaccines - AstraZeneca (AZ), Pfizer (PF) and Moderna (MO) - have been used in a nationwide inoculation programmed aimed at preventing harm from the so-called SARS-CoV2 virus. COVID-X-24 Blood and Non Vaccines Blood and Secret Pedophile's Blood Bank U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dye2c-covid-19-blood-and-non-vaccines-blood-and-secret-pedophiles-blood-bank-u.s..html This is probably the key to everything. For the Vaxxed, for the Unvaxxed. Here is an explanation of the natural and synthetic parasites we are facing, and a guide to the three things you need to do to protect yourself and your family. Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell A notarized copy of a document is a certified copy of the original document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public. The notary public will typically stamp the copy with their seal and signature, indicating that they have verified the authenticity of the document and the identity of the person signing it. In some cases, a notarized copy may be acceptable as evidence in court or for official purposes, but it’s always best to check with the relevant authorities or institution to confirm their specific requirements. It’s also important to note that a notarized copy is not the same as a signed copy. A signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it, but it has not been verified or authenticated by a notary public. In summary, a notarized copy is a certified copy of a document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public, while a signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it. I am a scholar of both law and politics. Here are four important questions for readers to consider on these important concepts. What is the presidential oath of office? The presidential oath of office comes from the U.S. Constitution. It requires that the President recite the following statement upon taking office: ( “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” ) Some legal observers believe that the presidential oath reflects a unique personal duty to shield the Constitution from external and internal threats to its integrity and sustainability. It could be argued that this presidential duty extends beyond preserving the Constitution itself to preserving the constitutional governmental order that it creates, the liberties it protects, and the nation and people it serves. Can violations of the presidential oath be prosecuted or legally enforced? The Constitution may impose a duty on a particular governmental officer, in this case the president, but that doesn’t mean the president’s failure to fulfill that duty can be punished or remedied by a court. The sheriff, in other words, can’t go arrest the president for not following his oath, nor could the president be indicted for failure to uphold the oath. This isn’t an isolated instance: There’s no legal remedy through court action available for a perceived violation of a number of constitutional provisions. For example, the Constitution’s Republican Form of Government Clause requires that the “United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and … against domestic Violence.” Yet the Supreme Court has held, in a 19th century case involving a rebellion against the existing Rhode Island government, that the courts have no authority to require the U.S. government to comply with the Constitution’s Republican Form of Government Clause. The Court ruled that the question whether a state government is “republican” in nature and thus valid under the Constitution is a political choice to be made by Congress, the representative body of the states. This “political question doctrine” has also emerged as a defense to recent lawsuits claiming that President Trump violated the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause by accepting payments from foreign officials at Trump businesses. That clause prohibits government officers from accepting presents from foreign heads of state without Congressional consent. According to this argument – made in motions to dismiss the lawsuits against Trump – enforcement of the Emoluments Clause is vested in the political branches, perhaps through impeachment, rather than in a court. The same analysis would apply to alleged violations of the Presidential oath of office. The oath contains vague obligations to protect or preserve the Constitution and appears to apply those duties to the President’s honorable discretion. It seems unlikely, just as with the Republican Form of Government Clause, that a court would be the place that alleged violations would be tried. Rather, it would more properly be considered a political question to be solved by the legislature. In other words, if people feel that Trump has violated the Oath of Office, they can encourage the House to impeach him. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. We Hope This Video Is The Great Awakening In 2025 Of The American People And Is A Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2025.

Area 51, Watergate, MK Ultra - as different as these three topics may seem, they’re all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. In the world of government conspiracies, something doesn’t have to be completely outlandish to get covered up. It just has to be kind of illegal, or at least make someone in the government look bad. For instance, whether the bomb lost near Tybee Island was an armed or unarmed nuke depends on who you ask, and who you believe. For every whisper of a downed UFO, there are hundreds of real secret government projects that we’ve never heard about, and that may never be declassified. That's why it’s always interesting to read about the secrets of the government that have actually been revealed. This list of the most successful government cover-ups covers a wide range of government secrets ranging from assassination attempts to mind control. Put on your tinfoil hat, it’s time to get weird. Whether or not you want to believe it, every president (whether Democrat or Republican) has knowledge of hidden government secrets. Some of them have to do with illicit military tactics, while others involve hidden railroads and alien conspiracies. It’s entirely possible that some of the government secrets on this list are fabrications or extensions of the truth. But the scariest stories are the ones that are 100% verified and true. Check your phone for wiretaps and dig into this list of the most successful US government secrets leaked. Vote up the biggest government cover-ups, and leave us a comment full of your craziest super real conspiracy theories. Every wonder what the US government uses as their Wikipedia? While they can access the same system we can, they also have an advanced system used to collect and gather information on TOP SECRET and sensitive projects called Intellipedia. According to the government’s admission here is what Intellipedia does for them: “Intellipedia is an online system for collaborative data sharing used by the United States Intelligence Community (IC). It was established as a pilot project in late 2005 and formally announced in April 2006 and consists of three wikis running on JWICS, SIPRNet, and Intelink-U. The levels of classification allowed for information on the three wikis are Top Secret, Secret, and Sensitive But Unclassified/FOUO information, respectively. They are used by individuals with appropriate clearances from the 16 agencies of the IC and other national-security related organizations, including Combatant Commands and other federal departments. The wikis are not open to the public.” Recently, the Intellipedia files were released to the public via the Freedom of Information Act, and in the video below I delve through some of the “conspiracy” files that the government has processed over the years. Here is the breaking report… CIA Mind Control When the Cold War was at its peak, the CIA began testing the possibility of using mind control to create sleeper agents that would infiltrate communist Russia. The project went by numerous names, but the most famous was Project MK-Ultra. It involved government scientists using methamphetamine, barbiturates, LSD, and hypnosis to break down a subject and then rebuild them with very specific qualities. Needless to say, it didn't work how they wanted it to. The project was scrapped, but not before CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all documents from Project MK-ULTRA to be destroyed. The Watergate Scandal The Watergate Scandal, named after the building where much of the scandal took place, is the most well-known government scandal of them all. The basic story goes like this: Under President Nixon's orders, a group of men broke into the DNC headquarters at the Watergate complex in order to find dirt on the Democratic party that could be used in upcoming elections. The men were caught, and money that they had on them was traced back to a slush fund used by a committee to re-elect the president. Nixon did his best to cover up the scandal, and even succeeded for a while, but the entire plot unraveled when a tape was released that proved Nixon was trying to cover up the scandal. And the rest is history. The JFK Assassination It probably goes without saying that the JFK assassination is one of the biggest suspected government cover-ups ever. Whether or not you believe the numerous conspiracy theories, you probably don't think that the government was completely transparent with the American people. With theories ranging from the presence of multiple gunmen to a rogue secret service agent who accidentally shot the president, it's safe to say that we'll never know the full story of President Kennedy's end. Area 51 Area 51 has long been considered a Mecca for conspiracy theorists, and while there have been a few legit cover-ups at Area 51 (spy plane tests, the SR-71 Blackbird, etc.), the Nevada-based government site is still a hotbed of secret activity. It probably goes without saying that we'll never know exactly what's going on out there in the desert, but that won't stop people from speculating. The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on CIA Torture In 2014, the Senate Report on CIA Detention Interrogation Program was released after five years of preparation. Inside, we finally saw that the CIA had not only been using illegal interrogation techniques, but that those so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" hadn't even worked all that well. We're not sure what the government wanted to cover up more: The fact that they'd been torturing people or that it was essentially useless. The CIA Tried To Take Out Castro In the '60s, America tried to assassinate Castro SO MANY TIMES that things kind of got out of hand. So much so that when the information on our many assassination attempts (which included everything from exploding cigars to mafia hits) was declassified almost 40 years after later, it made our government look like writers for Get Smart. The My Lai Massacre The My Lai Massacre was a mass killing of around 500 unarmed civilians that took place during the Vietnam War. Initially, the massacre was reported as a routine battle. But after a helicopter gunner sent a letter to Congress asking them to investigate the incident, the story blew open. Unfortunately, many military officials still see the My Lai Massacre as collateral damage. The Iran-Contra Affair This scandal from the presidency of Ronald Reagan continues to be one of the biggest cover-ups in recent history. Initially, the Iran-Contra deal began as a way for President Reagan to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by facilitating the sale of arms to Iran. But after the sale was made, a portion of the money went to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua. Even after all of this information was released, Reagan's involvement with the deal has remained classified, and the few convictions that were handed down to lower-level government agents were either overturned or the men were pardoned by President George H.W. Bush during the final year of his presidency. The Teapot Dome Scandal In the early 1920s, the Teapot Dome scandal rocked America when it was revealed that the Secretary of the Interior had been leasing Navy petroleum reserves at super low rates without competitive bidding. The secretary was sentenced to prison for accepting bribes, but no one was ever convicted for paying those bribes. The Siege Of Waco Most people who are old enough to remember the ATF's siege on David Koresh's Waco compound know the basic premise of this affair: The government wanted to shut down a cult that was hoarding a massive amount of weapons. But the true story of the siege is way more nuanced. David Koresh and the Branch Davidians had been living peacefully in Mount Carmel for a year when the ATF set their sights on them. But thanks to a lack of planning and poor execution, the ATF ended up with a massacre on their hands. To this day, conflicting reports of what truly happened in Waco abound, and it's likely that the truth will never come out. Franklin Child Prostitution Ring This cover-up shows how depraved we can really be when we become blinded by absolute power. The Franklin Child Prostitution Ring lasted from the late '80s to the early '90s and allegedly involved members of the Republican party, including Nebraska FCU branch manager Lawrence King. Allegedly, King transported children of all ages across the country for secret "parties" where the children would be molested, beaten, and even murdered. When the ring was exposed, the witnesses were deemed not credible. But Lawrence King was given a prison term of four and a half years for embezzling funds. The Majestic 12 The Majestic 12 is the code name of a supposed secret committee of 12 scientists, military leaders, and government officials formed by President Truman in 1947 under the auspices of recovering and investigating a downed alien aircraft. The alleged cover-up came to light in the mid-'80s when a Ufologist received a mysterious envelope that contained pictures of eight pages of documents that appeared to be briefing papers describing "Operation Majestic Twelve." Bohemian Grove Bohemian Grove, while not one of the US government's most well-hidden secrets, is definitely one of its strangest. Bohemian Grove is a campsite in Northern California that you can visit any time you like, except in mid-July, when it plays host to a two-week encampment of the world's leaders. There have been theories as to what happens at Bohemian Grove. Stories range from orgies to cannibalism and even Satanic rituals. At one point, the Franklin Child Prostitution ring was even linked to the Grove. Despite multiple investigations, no one's ever truly found out what happens at the encampment. You know what they say, what happens at Bohemian Grove, stays at Bohemian Grove. The Plot To Take Out Hitler Like the many plots to take out Castro, America tried to kill Hitler so many times that you'd think we were living in an episode of Hogan's Heroes. The main plot is often referred to as the "July 20th Plot" or "Operation Valkyrie," and the aim was to use members of Hitler's own party to take him out. Then, the US would assume power from within to create peace between Germany and the Western Allies. Unfortunately, the plot failed, which led to the arrest of at least 7,000 people by the Gestapo. HAARP HAARP was an ionospheric research facility in Alaska, and the scandal surrounding it remains one of the most widely contested government cover-ups ever. Theorists debate not only the function but the necessity of having a High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Some people believe that HAARP is a secret military weapon, while others believe that HAARP technology is being used to trigger floods, major power outages, and thunderstorms. Track 61 Throughout the '40s, there was a secret railway in Grand Central station that catered to FDR and any VIPs who were deemed special enough to use the train. Chemtrails What would a discussion of government cover-ups be without the mention of chemtrails? Allegedly, the contrails left behind air crafts when they fly across the country contain biological agents that have harmful effects on the general population. Chemtrail truthers argue that normal contrails dissipate almost immediately, while the spooky chemtrails take much longer to go away (because of all the chemicals). Despite multiple debunkings and the government's denial of using contrails to dose people with... something, people still believe it's a cover-up. Project Serpo Put your tinfoil hat on for this one. Project Serpo is the name of an alleged top-secret exchange program between the United States government and an alien planet called Serpo. The planet is supposedly the home of The Greys (if you click that link, we're not responsible for the rabbit hole you'll go down), and the place where 12 members of American military personnel visited between 1965 and 1978. Since then, all of the party have perished, supposedly from the effects of high radiation levels from the two suns of the planet.

Secret Courts History of Intrigue and Abuse and over 800s of million dollars in pay off to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Judges so far. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which approved the National Security Agency's collection of U.S. citizens' telephone records, is just one of history's many secret courts. The fundamental premise behind secret courts like the FISC is that some decisions cannot be made in public without jeopardizing a critical national interest, such as security, defense or government administration. Therefore, the proceedings of a secret court are closed to the public. Court records are kept sealed; they can only be seen under specific conditions by certain people, and much of the information in secret court records may be redacted before viewing by anyone outside the court. In many secret courts, only one side of an issue is presented to the several judges sitting on the court bench. Secret court decisions are usually final and are not subject to appeal. The names of judges who preside over secret courts may or may not be known. In most cases, even the fact that a secret court exists, or has arrived at a decision on a particular issue, is not known to the public. The advantages of a secret court are its ability to make a decision quickly and without public knowledge of its proceedings. Many critics claim, however, that those same qualities undermine the legitimacy of secret courts. The Star Chamber In medieval England, the Star Chamber was a secret court named for the decorative stars emblazoned on the ceiling of the wood-paneled room in which its judges deliberated. The Star Chamber oversaw the proceedings of the local courts; it was also able to decide matters involving wealthy and powerful people whose influence made them immune to the decisions of lower judicial bodies. Over the centuries, the Star Chamber was often used to break up the power of England's land-owning elites. Punishment was swift and could be severe, though the court never condemned anyone to death. As a flexible organization with wide-ranging powers, the Star Chamber was a valuable ally to kings needing a quick and fair decision on an important matter, sometimes involving a political rival, but often involving crimes like riots, corruption and sedition. Under some rulers, however, the secretive Star Chamber abused its considerable power to oppress and punish people — often religious dissidents like the Puritans — who had no hope of appeal. Due to its excesses, the Star Chamber was abolished by Parliament in 1641. The chamber itself was dismantled some years later, though its legendary star-studded ceiling was preserved and can now be seen in Leasowe Castle in Cheshire, England. From the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA, the U.S. Army and other intelligence-gathering government entities often spied with impunity on civil-rights activists, anti-war protestors, political candidates and thousands of other citizens. To stem these abuses, the seven-member FISC was authorized by Congress in 1978. The secret court — all hearings are closed to the public and proceedings are considered classified — is responsible for reviewing search-warrant applications drafted by the National Security Agency (NSA). According to the Federal Judicial Center, "each application must contain the Attorney General’s certification that the target of the proposed surveillance is either a 'foreign power' or 'the agent of a foreign power' and, in the case of a U.S. citizen or resident alien, that the target may be involved in the commission of a crime." Presiding over the FISC is a three-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, empowered to critique the decisions of the FISC if a government agency requests a review. Until 2002, the Court of Review had never convened. With the passage of the USA Patriot Act of 2001, however, the role of the FISC changed somewhat. The Patriot Act extended the time periods during which surveillance can be conducted. The Patriot Act also increased the number of FISC judges from seven to 11; the four additional judges were appointed by conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist. No one argues against the government at FISC Court Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden has asked President for a pardon, and the ACLU, which represents Snowden in the US, agrees Established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, the court’s mandate is to approve special surveillance warrants (FISA warrants) against suspected foreign agents to be used by American federal agencies, typically the NSA or the FBI. One of eleven judges who are tapped from existing posts in the federal circuit can then grant that warrant’s approval. In the court’s history, warrants (and related orders) are approved more than 99 percent of the time. The court’s publicly accessible docket is pretty short—in fact, the website didn't even exist until recently. “I think one has to be disturbed to learn as we recently have that more than 1,800 applications and [around] more than 1,800 approvals have been made by the court,” Gary Hart, a former Colorado senator who sat on the Church Committee, told Ars. That select senatorial committee was created in the 1970s, and its recommendations paved the way for FISA and FISC. “I would be a little more comfortable if there were more rejections,” he said. “The glass half-full is that properly trained and qualified judges are hearing persuasive cases. But as a lawyer, this is not a typical judicial proceeding that we're familiar with, because there's no other side. Unlike virtually everything else [in the legal system,] it's not adversarial. The judge hears [the government’s case,] but there's nobody else to argue the other side. If you're a constitutionalist as I am, that's disturbing.” Around the time Edward Snowden got his first job in the intelligence community, I decided to leave my position as an ACLU lawyer in the hope I could make a difference by going inside America’s growing surveillance state. Surprisingly, senior intelligence officials took a chance on hiring me in a unique new office safeguarding civil liberties and privacy. I began work in June 2006. For the next seven years, I worked with a growing team of internal privacy watchdogs inside the intelligence community. We reviewed the most secret surveillance programs in government, including the major programs that Snowden later leaked. Our job was to ensure those programs had a firm basis in law and included protections for privacy and civil liberties. While I am proud of the work we did, it is fair to say that until Snowden stole a trove of top secret documents and gave them to reporters in 2013, we had limited success. It took a Snowden to spark meaningful change. The NSA’s operations are essential to national security and to international stability, but it is hard to reconcile them with the values of a free society. Snowden forced the NSA to become more transparent, more accountable, more protective of privacy—and more effective. Today, the NSA’s vital surveillance operations are on a sounder footing—both legally and in the eyes of the public—than ever before. For that, the United States government has reason to say, “Thank you, Edward Snowden.” In the last four years, there have been more significant reforms to mass surveillance than we saw in the four decades before the Snowden revelations began. Not since the post-Watergate reforms of the Ford and Carter administrations has the intelligence community faced such scrutiny. The NSA has taken painful steps to open up. The most secret of the government’s secret agencies will never be a model of transparency. Still, it has never been more transparent than it is today. Before Snowden, basic information like the number of targets of the NSA’s mass surveillance operations affected by court-ordered surveillance was a closely-guarded secret. Today, the head of the intelligence community publishes an annual transparency report that provides these and other details. Before Snowden, the NSA used a secret interpretation of the Patriot Act to amass a nationwide database of American telephone records. Congress has nowreplaced this program of bulk collection with an alternative program that leaves the data with telephone companies. Before Snowden, the secret court that authorizes intelligence surveillance never heard more than the government’s side of the argument. Now, outside lawyersroutinely appear to argue the case for privacy. Before Snowden, there was no written order, directive or policy that gave any consideration to the privacy of foreigners outside the United States. When intelligence officials asked lawyers like me about privacy, it went without saying that we were talking about American citizens and residents. Today, for the first time in history, a presidential directive requires privacy rules for surveillance programs that affect foreigners outside the United States. In an agreement with the European Union, the American government has been forced to adopt new protections for foreign data. In the next few years, the NSA’s partners in the United Kingdom will have to justify the surveillance practices of both countries in court against human rights challenges. In 2017, Congress will review PRISM—a program leaked by Snowden that allows the NSA to obtain e-mails and other communications from American technology companies. The law that provides authority for PRISM expires at the end of the year. The law also gives the NSA access to the internet backbone facilities of American telecommunications companies, in a program called “upstream collection.” Until Snowden leaked details about PRISM and upstream collection, little was known about how the law worked. Thanks to Snowden, the debate over whether and how these programs should continue will be one in which the public is reasonably well informed – unlike the debates in Congress over the Patriot Act in 2001, 2005, 2009, and 2011, over the Protect America Act in 2007, over the FISA Amendments Act in 2008 and 2012, and over the constitutionality of the FISA Amendments Act in the Supreme Court in 2013. The NSA’s new transparency about its surveillance operations showed that they were designed not to bring about a dystopian society where privacy would be abolished, but to collect intelligence vital to the national security. To be sure, Snowden’s trove of documents and the investigations that followed showed some programs were more effective than others. The same privacy board that reviewed PRISM said that the NSA’s bulk collection of American telephone records had “minimal value.” The board could find “no instance in which the program directly contributed to the discovery of a previously unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist attack.” Still, there has been remarkably little evidence of intentional abuse of the NSA’s sweeping powers for improper purposes unrelated to intelligence. None was revealed by Snowden. In response to inquiries from Congress in the fall of 2013, the NSA itself disclosed that itsinspector general had uncovered a dozen incidents over ten years in which analysts used overseas collection to spy on ex-girlfriends. As a result, the programs Snowden exposed have all survived in some form. In the case of telephone records, the NSA says that the privacy reforms adopted by Congress have actually resulted “access to a greater volume of call records” than before. Many of the NSA’s other mass surveillance programs also enjoy greater public support and legitimacy than they did before Snowden came along. As Jack Goldsmith observes wryly, “These are but some of the public services for which the U.S. government has Snowden to thank.” Edward Snowden’s actions caused great damage to national security. They should not have been necessary to achieve the sensible reforms of the past four years. That they were represents a failure of leadership by the intelligence community and the national security teams of the previous two administrations. For me, that failure is at least in part a personal one. As a privacy and civil liberties official inside the intelligence community, and later at the White House, my job was precisely to provide top officials with confidential advice about how to ensure that intelligence programs were protective of our liberties. In doing so, I made just the sort of arguments that many have said Snowden should have raised internally instead of compromising classified information. Unlike Snowden, I had direct access to the officials that could have made surveillance reform a reality—and who did so, after the Snowden leaks forced their hand. There is no way a junior NSA contractor could have accomplished more. Snowden’s critics argue that he should have made his concerns about privacy known through official channels without disclosing secrets and without breaking the law. That would have achieved nothing—even in an imaginary world in which the agency had a perfect system for protecting whistleblowers. Snowden’s concerns were not those of a traditional whistleblower. Snowden’s complaint was not that the NSA was violating its rules, but that its aggressive pursuit of its mission—even as it largely adhered to its existing rules – posed a serious risk to privacy in the digital age. If Snowden was wrong about mass surveillance being an “architecture of oppression,” he was certainly right about that, as many government officials have now acknowledged. There is an inherent tension between the values of a free society and mass surveillance. For Snowden and his supporters, the answer is easy. End mass surveillance—which is to say, most of what the NSA does. Those of us who believe that the NSA’s far-flung operations are essential to national security and global stability have the harder task of keeping mass surveillance under control. If Snowden deserves our thanks for both this round of surveillance reform and the next, it is only because the laws and institutions we created to control surveillance had become so obsolete. Intelligence agencies should not need the shock of massively damaging leak to abandon programs that are not working and refine and improve those that are. Disclosing details of classified programs should not be the most effective way to force change. It makes no sense for the United States government to pursue Snowden like a digital age Inspector Javert while at the same time admitting that his actions strengthened both our civil liberties and our national security. This is especially true because it was the intelligence community’s own shortcomings that made his reckless leak the only effective way to achieve reform. If Snowden returned to the United States today, of course, he would have to stand trial for disclosing classification communications intelligence, among other serious crimes. This will never happen. Snowden’s lawyers know he would likely be convicted and would face a lengthy prison term. Under federal sentencing guidelines, an offender with no criminal history who is convicted of disclosing “Top Secret” communications information under 18 U.S.C. § 793(d) faces a prison term in the range of 168-210 months, or 14 to 17.5 years. See U.S.S.G.M. § 2M3.2. Snowden might face a considerably longer sentence if convicted of additional charges, or as a result of sentencing enhancements. Naturally, Snowden prefers to stay abroad. The law does not allow the public interest defense that Snowden says he wants, nor should it. Permitting such a defense would encourage copycats. A Snowden wannabe might hope his lawyer could convince a credulous jury that his leaks also had some positive outcome, even if the benefits were scant. The Snowden disclosures were a unique watershed event, resulting in historic reforms. It is highly unlikely a future leak of classified surveillance information would produce such positive change. While Snowden might be enticed to return if offered a favorable plea agreement, negotiating such a deal would create poor incentives. One idea, favored by the top lawyer for the intelligence community, was for Snowden to plead guilty to a single felony charge and serve three to five years in exchange for his help undoing the damage he caused. Through his lawyer, Snowden has said he would never plead guilty to a felony. If a plea deal was ever really on the table, Snowden has less to offer every day, as the information he leaked becomes stale and the intelligence community moves on. In any event, the Justice Department rightly objects to negotiating plea agreements with fugitives, to avoid giving those who flee prosecution an advantage over those that do not. Thousands of U.S. judges who broke laws or oaths remained on the bench Today. You Can Read Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and False Propaganda Administration Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct Tyrannical Law Info. Below: SECRET CANON 1 ATTORNEY GENERAL AND PUBLIC DEFENDER 1 Prosecutorial Discretion 1(A) We hold the prudent practice of "see, hear and speak no evil" essential as related to the office of the Attorney General [secretly called the "power structure's Mafia"]. Therefore: 1(A)(i) We hold the latitude we give the Public Defender's office compensates for any inequality of justice or prosecutorial misconduct and 1(A)(ii) We ignore the practice of overcharging by the Attorney General regardless of how many are forced into false admissions or plea bargains. 1(A)(iii) We hold overcharging can assist bar members with revenue enhancement and improves efficiency by reducing demands for jury trials and we shall not consider any guidelines stating otherwise or the devastation in the lives of those so affected. 1(A)(iv) Since it is the job of the Attorney General to "get" people, any means they use to do so is acceptable since they are the will and voice of the people. 1(A)(v) If the Attorney General's Office violates laws, rules or ethics while "getting" people then let the trial process sort it out. To hell with the following: those who can't afford effective counsel, a trial or those having a Public Defender and those who get a Judge skilled in the use of judicial discretion who covers up or ignores prosecutorial misconduct citing "judicial efficiency" and the "duty of the state." 1(A)(vi) Having a bold aggressive Attorney General is of greater benefit to Society than any possible damage to individual life and liberty. 1(B) Public Defender 1(B)(i) The importance we place on justice can always be measured by the amount of resources given the Public Defender in proportion to the amount of resources given the Attorney General. 1(B)(ii) Under staffing and under funding of the Public Defender: enhances Judicial efficiency and eases the court calendar by promoting plea bargains, suicides, breakdowns, despair, fleeing etc. and can give us more bang for our buck by turning the Public Defender into an extension of the Attorney General's office and can demonstrate effective use of the "good cop (Public Defender)" "bad cop (Attorney General)" scenario and can assist members of the bar with property acquisition and other revenue enhancements. 1(B)(iii) Any uncooperative Public Defender making an issue of judicial or prosecutorial misconduct or ethics violations shall be removed as quickly as possible. SECRET CANON 2 JUDICIAL BEHAVIOR TOWARDS LITIGANTS 2(A) Confident Litigants Any litigant appearing confident can be baffled by minutia or Judicially enhanced procedural criteria. 2(B) Judicial Dominance Occasionally we encounter a litigant who doesn't know we are king. We hold the following tools effective in forcing a resistant litigant into submission: intimidation by any means condescending looks, gestures or comments expressing or instigating anger, outrage or shock obvious impatience rushing the proceedings frequent checks of the time cautionary glances toward the Bailiff appearing distressed or uncomfortable like one needing to go to the bathroom yelling the magic word "NEXT!" raising unrelated, irrelevant or confusing issues and loud bangs using the gavel. 2(C) The Need For Attorneys We shall continue to stress the need to have an Attorney without addressing the fact the overwhelming majority of Americans can not afford them. This is effective in keeping the unresourceful and ineffective at bay. 2(D) The Ultimate Authority Citizens must be continually led to believe that the Judiciary is the final or ultimate authority in our system of Government. 2(E) Practice Of Law Forbidden We shall try as best we can to confuse clarifying issues with our inability to give advice. This makes us less apt to stick our foot in our mouth. 2(F) Sincerity Of The Judiciary We shall never appear insincere when stating absurdities, untruths, mistruths or nonsense. We shall always act like the hearer is unknowledgeable, naive or unseasoned. 2(G) Judicial Fairness We shall always remember when deciding the significance of an individual to consider money, connections, power, politics and the ability to get media attention in deciding how fair we need to be. 2(H) Judicial Response To Criticism We forever hold the response to valid or invalid criticism should be indignance. 2(I) Judicial Efficiency We hold instigating outrage, frustration, anger or other emotions in litigants can be an effective tool to rid ourselves of the unwanted litigant. 2(J) Judicial Handling Of The Ignorant The client demanding Justice and the full respect of their rights shall be treated with pity and patience. 2(K) Judicial Authority Due to the authoritative nature of black robes, we shall continue to resist their removal. SECRET CANON 3 EXPERTS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY 3(A) Efficiency Of Experts We hold one of the greatest innovations for eliminating ineffective and unresourceful litigants is the ever expanding use of expert testimony. 3(B) Evolution Of Experts This innovation will reach maturity when we routinely use levels of experts on experts to testify on the validity and expertise of each expert. SECRET CANON 4 JUDICIAL AND PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION 4(A) Discretion Defined We maintain judicial and prosecutorial discretion is doing whatever we damn well please within the judicially prudent guidelines we happen to be following at the time. 4(B) Review Of Discretionary Acts We shall never promulgate awareness of the real legal issue regarding the use and review of judicial and prosecutorial discretion which is the process of reasoning used in the discretionary act's decision making process. We shall convert the process of reasoning argument into an argument regarding the validity of doing or not doing the discretionary act. SECRET CANON 5 JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT 5(A) Oversight Immunity The immunity of everyone overseeing the Judiciary must be maintained to prevent witch hunts and the overzealous from affecting the independence of the Judiciary. The Judiciary does not require the vulnerable or corrective oversight of the masses. 5(B) Judicial Objectivity We shall always remember the real symbolic reason behind the woman with the blindfold and scale. Objectivity and independence means remaining as blind as possible to wrong doing committed by the Judiciary, members of the bar, and the resourceful and effective. 5(C) Judicial Self-Evaluation To maintain the independence of the Judiciary, we hold each others rulings to be legally and factually correct regardless of the injustice that results, the facts or the law. 5(D) Judicial Opinions Of Judges To insure effective oversight of the Judiciary, we shall never criticize each other regardless of the severity of the wrong or the injustice. 5(E) Trust Us, We're Judges We hold self monitoring and absolute immunity as foolhardy, ineffective and unworkable for everyone except the Judiciary and judicial oversight committees. 5(F) Judicial Job Performance To allows us to remain unconcerned about upsetting the status quo, we shall keep the public convinced their interference will negatively affect the independence of the Judiciary making Judges afraid to do their jobs. 5(G) The Judicial Mosaic Tablet We shall forever speak of centuries of Judicial immunities as proof of Judicial immunities' necessity and effectiveness without ever mentioning Judicial wrongdoing has been around as long as Judges. 5(H) Delay = Denied We hold admission of any Judicial wrongdoing delayed is admission of Judicial wrongdoing denied. 5(I) Complete And Through Review We hold there is no judicial wrongdoing which can not be diminished by time, levels of hearings and precise dissection , categorization and delegation of related facts and responsibilities. SECRET CANON 6 JUDICIAL THOUGHT AND LEGAL REASONING 6(A) Judicial Zen 6(A)(i) We hold the logic for our legal reasoning is embodied in the following statement which is understood only by the enlightened: "Because we open a window to the outside of this room does not mean we order, allow, permission or induce any air, dust, molecules, light waves, solar radiation, atoms, or any known or unknown wave or particulate matter from outside to enter this room and are not responsible if said events occur due to the contextual basis of our decisions." 6(A)(ii) We believe in the existence of the metaphysical "third eye." This enables us to selectively avoid looking out our other two eyes. 6(A)(iii) In the beginning was our word. Our word was with God, our word IS God. 6(A)(iv) To think is to be right. 6(A)(v) There is no issue that cannot be split into parts, and there is no part that can't be considered as the whole issue. 6(B) The Dangers Of Common Sense And Factual Integration 6(B)(i) The consideration of the end result our decision has when integrated with the "outside world" can lead to decisions based on "common sense" and must be avoided. 6(B)(ii) "Common Sense" lessens the highly specialized analytical and intelligent nature of the Judiciary creating the undesirable illusion we think like the masses. 6(B)(iii) "Common sense" must not be part of legal proceedings because it cannot be objectively verified. 6(B)(iv) Large scale factual integration with realities of the outside world can negatively affect the perfection of our written word. 6(C) Judicial Self Esteem We endeavor to remain forever impressed with each other, our performance and our status irregardless of the availability or affordability of Justice. 6(D) Lip Service We hold the consideration and realities of the quality or delivery of Justice should be given lip service faithfully. 6(E) The Third Person We hold the "system" shall always be spoken of in the third person as if it operates independently from individuals. 6(F) Judicial Secret Mantra We may think but not say, "I am the closest thing to God you will ever know." 6(G) Protection Of Status Quo We shall remember "separate but equal" was around for 100 years. If we hadn't listened to the masses it might still be good law. Therefore we shall keep the shades drawn so reality won't affect or disturb the independence of our decision making process or the Status Quo. 6(H) The Written Word We hold what looks good on paper must be good. 6(I) The Primary Concern We shall never consider the end result of our decisions unless it could result in professional embarrassment, loss of status or media attention. 6(J) Public Ignorance Arrogance is how Citizens define us when they are not fully aware of the nature or scope of our position. 6(K) Judicial Discretion Judicial Discretion means we can do what we damn well please and is a great tool for denying appeals and judicial wrongdoing. 6(L) The Ultimate Truth We irreversibly hold reality must conform to our decisions. 6(M) Judicial Precision We shall forever work on perfecting the art of the polite, dignified, respectful, orderly administered and well twisted screw. 6(N) The Judicial Last Laugh As related to the Judiciary, the term "over my dead body" is not a cliche but factually correct. SECRET CANON 7 JURIES AND JURY TRIALS 7(A) Constitution Typo We hold the right in the Constitution to jury trials in civil matters is a typo. 7(B) Evidence Seen By Jury We hold the illusion of justice can be created by thoughtful selection of the evidence seen by the Jury. 7(C) Evolution Of Jury Trials Except for criminal matters for the wealthy, we secretly maintain the elimination of jury trials and continue searching for ways to get that goddamn Constitution out of our way. 7(D) Jury Nullification We shall remember to act outraged at any mention of the vulgar practice called Jury Nullification. 7(D)(i) Judicial View On Jury Nullification And Instruction We hold the public does not have the intellectual sophistication to handle the power that comes with jury nullification. This power should only be in the hands of the Judiciary. 7(D)(ii) Jury Instruction In our continuing efforts to protect the public we must continue to "persuade" juries, via involuntary neurological suppression, into believing: 7(D)(ii)(1) they can only do what we say and 7(D)(ii)(2) they are not allowed to vote their conscience and 7(D)(ii)(3) they should only vote regarding facts and judicially selected evidence, not facts and the law. 7(E) Jury Selection We must continue to use the word "random selection" when describing the jury selection pool since "random selection" can mean a non specific selection of any group. SECRET CANON 8 JUSTICE 8(A) The Value Of Justice We forever hold Justice as the precious and proper administration of laws filtered by legal analysis and unaffected by the end result, even when the end result is the improper administration of laws. 8(B) The Privilege Of Justice We hold Justice to be more of a privilege than a right. As a result, Justice should never be dispensed casually, freely or indiscriminately. 8(C) Appeals Insure Justice We hold a denial of justice is an impossibility due to everyone's right of appeal. We hold this to be true irregardless of a litigant's time, money or resources. 8(D) Justice For All We hold Justice is for all , but only after first deciding which standard of law we will apply, the "spirit of the law" or the "letter of the law" and after; 8(D)(i) the exact terminology and the exact questions are used to describe the injustice in the exact manner we require at the time and 8(D)(ii) said terminology is precisely used with other precise terminology in the exact manner we happen to be requiring at the time and 8(D)(iii) the exact form is used in the exact manner we happen to be requiring at the time and 8(D)(iv) said form is exactly prepared with other exactly prepared forms which we are requiring at the time and 8(D)(v) time requirements are exactly followed with respect to a host of issues that we happen to be requiring at the time and 8(D)(vi) all tools of eliminating litigants have been judiciously attempted such as overcharging, plea bargain, premature dismissals, expert testimony, res judicata,etc. and 8(D)(vii) we can't possibly find a way to use the great catch all "judicial discretion" to eliminate a litigant and 8D(viii) we have made litigants go through as many possible steps as we can conjure up irregardless of the litigant's time or financial resources and 8(D)(ix) any other judicially prudent, meticulous and painstaking attempt at finding a reason to avoid granting Justice unnecessarily. 8(E) Due Process Defined First, decide how we want the case to go. Second, formulate a legal logic to support our decision. Third, manipulate, dissect or eliminate the facts and evidence to support our decision. Then the rubber stamp doctrine of "judicial discretion" will prevent most decisions from being overturned SECRET CANON 9 LAW 9(A) The Nature Of Law We hold the nature of the law similar to "silly putty". We may bend, stretch or reshape the law to say what fits our purpose. 9(B) The Flexibility Of Law We hold the law is like the Bible, it can be made to say anything we want with enough quotes, viewpoints and cross references. 9(C) The Standards Of Law The "letter of the law" and the "spirit of the law" are two different legal standards of Justice and the Law. We may choose the standard that suits our fancy. 9(D) The Equal Application Of Law We hold the law must always be equally applied, depending on the circumstances and the litigant. 9(E) No One Above The Law We hold no one is above the law. [Tee hee hee, wink wink] SECRET CANON 10 ON AND OFF THE RECORD 10(A) Purpose Of Back Room Meetings We will make ample use of back room meetings to keep litigants in the dark. They can not and should not see or understand the process of litigation. 10(B) Back Room Meetings Enhance Justice 10(B)(i) We hold injustice can not result from back room meetings because if wrongdoing occurs, clients can sue their Lawyers for malpractice. 10(B)(ii) To avoid complications, we avoid mentioning or considering the resources required for or the near impossibility of finding a lawyer to sue another lawyer. 10(C) Health Benefits Of Back Room Meetings We hold the practice of moving to and from back room meetings can assist with circulation, constipation, rectal itch, gaseous emissions, breathing and caloric consumption. 10(D) Back Room Meetings Are Open Court We shall go off the record as much as possible being careful to maintain the illusion of "open court." 10(E) The Unmentionable Contract We prefer clients not be present in back room meetings while never mentioning we hold the client to whatever their lawyer agrees to in these meetings. 10(F) Accuracy Of Record We resist new equipment that transcribes immediately. We prefer to have the option of making corrections to insure accuracy before the record is transcribed. 10(G) Consequences Of Clients At Back Room Meetings We hold a client's presence at back room meetings can result in inappropriate evaluations of Judicial and Attorney conduct and expertise. SECRET CANON 11 PRO SE'S, THE POOR AND INDIGENTS 11(A) The Protection Of The Public 11(A)(i) We hold the need to protect the public from the dangers of self representation far outweighs the fair impartial administration of Justice. To protect the public from the dangers of self representation we shall: 11(A)(i)(1) approach the Pro Se, poor or indigent's complaint from this objectively protective and compassionate position, "Is there anyway I can deny this petition?" 11(A)(i)(2) use Judicially prudent unbiased techniques to intimidate, frustrate, anger, nit pick, postpone, play with or in any other way rid ourselves of a Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant. 11(A)(i)(3) assist the Pro Se, poor or indigent in a resolution by bending or ignoring the rules on ex parte communications. 11(A)(i)(4) nurture an unfriendly environment in a dignified and polite manner. 11(A)(i)(5) minimize or ignore Judicial, Court or Attorney errors while magnifying any errors of the Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant. 11(A)(i)(6) politely move on to the next case before the Pro Se, poor or indigent is finished. This will assist eliminating them later with arguments such as Res Judicata. 11(B) Disposition Before Written Decisions 11(B)(i) It is best to be rid of a Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant before having to render a decision requiring written legal analysis. 11(B)(ii) If forced to render a written opinion on a Pro Se , poor or indigent case, we will stick to or switch to the arguments that validate our desired position. 11(B)(iii) In Pro Se poor or indigent cases, we prefer unpublished opinions. This makes it easier to perpetuate non sequiturs and pseudo-justice while maintaining the illusion of due process. 11(C)(iv) We hold "giving the dog a bone" occasionally is good practice and gives us some ammunition when our integrity is questioned. 11(C) The Superiority Of Bar Members When dealing with a Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant, we shall always give credence to members of the Bar's arguments, regardless of how absurd or off point they are. 11(D) The Superiority Of The Status Quo In cases involving the system, member of the bar or the status quo versus the Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant make sure the system, member of the bar or the status quo prevail regardless of how you must ignore or pervert the issues . 11(E) Irrebuttable Presumption Of Pro Se Ignorance We hold the Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant does not or can not understand the complex issues of litigation. 11(F) Methods For Smart Alec Pro Se, Poor Or Indigent Litigants If a Pro Se, poor or indigent does understand the issues we shall: 11(F)(i) repeatedly bait them to go off point or 11(F)(ii) convince them they don't understand or 11(F)(iii) diligently look for and focus on a point they don't understand clearly or 11(F)(iv) continue until they err, running with the error to make a touchdown. 11(G) Attitude Toward Naive Pro Se, poor or indigent Litigant We shall always take a patient but condescending attitude with a Pro Se, poor or indigent litigant that is so naive as to demand and expect fair, impartial Justice and the law applied as written. 11(H) The Inability To Practice Law Our inability to give legal advice or advocate is restricted to Pro Se, poor or indigent litigants, not members of the bar, the fictitious corporate person or the State. 11(I) The In Forma Pauparis Hearing We hold when questioning a litigant attempting to file In Forma Pauparis regarding what they own to never reveal the legal definition of "own" is to have and hold title. This effectively eliminates the unresourceful and ineffective and our ass is covered. 11(J) The Judicial Nightmare The nightmare of having the public believe they have a chance of receiving justice without a lawyer must be avoided at all costs. The Courts are best operated as a "members only" organization. SECRET CANON 12 PUBLIC AND THE MEDIA 12(A) Appeasing The Public 12(A)(i) Exemplifying one case where the system worked can cover a multitude of sins. 12(A)(ii) Occasional written opinions regarding concern about justice for the poor are effective in perpetuating the myth that we are continually and aggressively working on this issue. 12(A)(iii) When all else fails, schedule future hearings. 12(B) Handling Of Liability We hold where liability of the privileged, the system or the status quo is involved, admission of wrong doing or error causes more harm than good. However, occasionally throwing the dog a bone can cover a multitude of sins. 12(C) Objective Public Image Maintained We will continue to resist equipment in legal proceedings that can record emotion, attitude or personality traits which can affect the course of proceedings. 12(D) High Profile Trials High profile trials are an opportunity to show Americans the way the system should work. This is advantageous to the overwhelming majority of Americans who would never see it otherwise. This also minimizes complaints of the non-existence of an effective judicial system. 12(E) The Priority Of The Public Trust We hold the public trust must be maintained regardless of how we have to lie, cheat or steal to maintain it. 12(F) Media Focus and Public Attention We hold hearings on any judicial wrongdoing should never be conducted when media attention or public awareness is high. 12(G) Judicial Verbal Equivalents To The Finger When dealing with the public and the media, we shall never forget the power of the statements, "You don't understand the intricacies and operations of law" and "It would be inappropriate for me to comment" and "Many times Judges have knowledge of details not known by the public." SECRET CANON 13 RULES AND PROCEDURES 13(A) Value Of Justice We hold Justice should always be fought for, never freely handed out. 13(B) The True Essence Of Procedure We shall strive to find the breaking point in each individual. 13(C) Productivity To create the illusion of productivity we shall forever hold Justice in front of litigants like a carrot on a stick. 13(D) Administration Of Justice We hold the selective and selectively meticulous application and adherence to rules and procedure can be used to override the administration of Justice if the administration of Justice requires it. 13(E) The Obstacle Course Objective We shall always remember the amount of Citizens we have to deal with is contingent on the number of hoops we require they go through. 13(F) Time Of The Essence We shall remember time is on our side and the passage of time can create the illusion of thoroughness. 13(G) Due Process We hold the term "due process" can imply the payment of money. SECRET CANON 14 THE SUPREMACY OF THE CORPORATE PERSON 14(A) The Corporate Person v. The Individual 14(A)(i) The fictitious Corporate person shall be held in higher esteem than the individual. 14(B)(ii) We hold individuals are better represented by a corporate entity. This is more efficient and results in fewer demands for Rights or Justice. SECRET CANON 15 LYING AND TRUTH TELLING 15(A) The Ethics Of Lying 15(A)(i) To maintain the ethical nature of legal proceedings, the word "lie" is considered vulgar as related to statements from the Judiciary or members of the bar. 15(A)(ii) We shall use terms like misspoke, spoken in error, inadvertent utterance, involuntary neurological transmission, spontaneous somnambulistic manifestation or some terminology denoting non deliberate intent when describing the statements in question. 15(A)(iii) We hold the near impossibility of the existence of the lie because objective reality can have countless varied creative interpretations and constructive descriptions. Calling another's view of objective reality a lie shows a lack of intelligence, creative viewpoints and critical thinking skills. 15(B) The Ethics Of Truth 15(B)(i) We hold truth is that which is least damaging to the status quo. Nevertheless, the status quo is clearly not in American interests. Snowden’s exile in Russia is a continuing embarrassment. Snowden has become a potent symbol for privacy and civil liberties, human rights, and an open internet in which surveillance operations are controlled by law. His presence in Moscow is a gift to Vladimir Putin, allowing the Russian president to cynically pose as a defender of digital human rights. Every time Snowden makes a virtual appearance before his admirers, the unspoken message is that he has been forced to seek asylum because the United States opposes these values. The message is no less effective for being false and unfair. By contrast with a trial or a plea agreement, a pardon is an unreviewable act of discretion by the president. Presidents have used them not only to correct injustices, but also when the broader interests of the nation outweigh the importance of punishing a crime even where some punishment is clearly deserved. Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon to help the country move beyond Watergate. Jimmy Carter pardoned draft dodgers to close the chapter on the Vietnam War. Pardons are exceedingly rare. A pardon sets no precedent and so creates no incentives. Future leakers could not count on one. Even if Snowden does not deserve a pardon for what former Attorney General Eric Holder called his act of “public service,” we should give him one and move on. We are the good guys. It is time for the world to know it again.

You can truly grieve for every officer who has been lost in the line of duty in this country and still be troubled by cases of police overreach. Those two ideas are not mutually exclusive. You can have great regard for law enforcement and still want them to be held to high standards. This is a compilation video containing 10 incidents involving police officers, which had all been previously reported by various media outlets. This video is not created to elicit negative views towards the police in general. The purpose of this compilation is purely informative. This video does not contain any paid promotion and it is not monetized in any way. These poll figures on police from 50 years ago provide a startling glimpse at the rise of the modern American police state. Not quite half a century ago, and following the summer riots in Detroit and other cities across the U.S. no less, most Americans trusted and respected the police. Nearly eight out of 10 adults responded they had a “great deal” of respect for police. In fact, only 6% of the 1,626 people polled across the country said they believed police brutality even existed at all. That figure had actually gone down from 9% on a prior poll in 1965, while the percent of people who claimed to have a “great deal” of respect for police rose from 70% in 1965 to 77% at the time of the 1967 poll. This means that the declarations of martial law and police response to and presence following the summer riots actually strengthened Americans’ views of police, not the other way around. In fact, only 4% of 1967 Gallup respondents said they had “hardly any” respect for the cops. Now compare that with how people feel and what’s going on today. In a 1999 Gallup Poll, 38% of Americans answered not only that they believe police brutality exists, but that they specifically believed incidents of police brutality had actually occurred in their area. Nearly a third (27%) responded that they personally felt they had been treated unfairly by police. By that time, 64% responded they had a “great deal” of respect for police, down 13% from the 1967 figures. The following year in 2000, only 60% said they had a “great deal” of respect for police. While not exactly the same poll, Gallup asked people in 2015 how much “confidence” they had in the police just this past June. Only 25% said “a great deal,” which Gallup noted was the lowest since 1993. In other words, Americans’ confidence in police hit a 22-year low. Wonder what it would be if they specifically asked Americans about police respect these days. Hardly a day goes by in recent years by that someone isn’t (or multiple someones aren’t) shot and killed by police in this country. Because a database was never properly kept on these killings, we’ll never be able to properly compare these figures with those from 50 years ago… but just judging on the poll numbers above, it isn’t hard to take a guess at how much less death by cop there used to be in America. Dealing with the problem of police being afraid to be afraid. With current police practices, one only need to be on the phone in your own home to be killed by police. I was almost killed by 2 Rhode Island state troopers. They purportedly came to the wrong address and, seeing me through the window, THOUGHT my phone was a gun. Having no gun, I also didn't comply with orders to drop the "gun" being clueless as to who they were talking to. Given current practices, deadly police force was allowed TWICE because: 1. they THOUGHT I had a gun and 2. I refused to follow a command when they had a "fear" of their life. A cops "belief" that their life is in danger, even when it is not, is all that is necessary to kill you and get away with it. Do you see the problem yet? -- from the author of this document. Either The Policing Problem Is Dealt With Effectively Or America Will Continue Being At War With Police Killing's and Brutality and Public Trust Is Now Gone! Watch almost any cop show or movie and you will see a consistent theme. The "good" cop has to "cross the line" for the "greater good." The fact the line was crossed and Citizens were abused, killed or violated gets lost in the "effectiveness", the end result of the police action (the arrests, the accolades and the awards). Many, if not most cops reach this point - the point where they must pretend to not see wrongdoing. The problem with America in general, but especially in the areas of justice or law enforcement, is this - "being effective" (getting a result) trumps the law, justice, Constitutional rights and morality. Cops discover to be "good", they have to be bad or ignore the bad some or all of the time. The outlets for "effective" policing (getting results with secondary or no consideration of law, justice, Constitutional rights or morals) is, for the most part, institutionalized racism (see report) and oppression of the poor. (see report) Visit any of our courts or prisons and this will become painfully clear. See Seven Reasons Police Brutality Is Systemic, Not Anecdotal "In the real world, cops are far from independent agents, Rather, they act within the constraints of a very powerful organizational culture that significantly influences and constrains their judgements and conduct. For similar reasons, viewing police brutality as a string of unrelated incidents belies reality. Police officers who misbehave are often part of a larger pattern of misconduct involving multiple incidents and multiple actors. Such patterns cannot be attributed solely to the misbehaving individuals. Individual officers are behaving as their departments have trained them to behave--whether explicitly or implicitly--and the organizational culture that cultivated and sustained them must also bear some responsibility." -- Barbara E. Armacost, Organizational Culture and Police Misconduct, 72 George Washington University Law Review 453, 476 (2004). Another way of saying that is "When Black Lives Matter, All Lives Matter. " Every civilized society needs structure and enforcement. This article is not anti-police; it is against excessive and unnecessary abuses and killings by police. Our Constitution was intended to protect us from abuses of government and law enforcement. The Constitution is now disregarded routinely for "effectiveness" at the expense of Law, justice, Constitutional rights and morality. What "works" has become more important than what is right. Today if you get charged, unless you have money, your innocence, if you are innocent, is irrelevant. More likely than not your lawyer and the prosecutor will work in collusion to force you into a plea which is always a guilty plea on some level. Resist that and they will throw the kitchen sink at you with threats and multiple charges with lengthy sentences. All this is done in the name of "judicial efficiency." Our Constitutional rights are being eroded. Couple that with policing that is more concerned with getting results with secondary or no consideration of law, justice, Constitutional rights or morals. Add to that the inherent tendency ALL of us have to abuse power (yes, YOU!) and we have the mess we have today. Give cops the rules of "effective" policing as defined here coupled with the inherent human weakness to abuse power to people who, for the most part, start policing in their twenties and you have some of the reasons for the insanity we have today. Cops are killing with impunity, guns come out for practically any reason imaginable, SWAT teams are used to serve warrants, militarizing of police, police using weapons of war against peaceful protestors, escalating the situation upon arrival, etc. Abusing power comes easy. Learning not to abuse power takes a lifetime. Terrorism And Tyranny Is NOT Policing! When the Ferguson police opened fire on peaceful protesters with 3 weapons of war, why wasn't THAT called rioting? Every American needs to watch the shocking, full video of this pathetic assault. Why wasn't the countless videos we have of police pointing guns at peaceful protesters "inciting a riot?" In some areas policing has become more about terrorism and tyranny instead of policing. The response to the uprisings in Ferguson regarding systemic abuses and racism added to the death of Michael Brown and Eric Garner in New York and countless others along with the ensuing nationwide protests brought many police chiefs to the media level with one basic message: SUBMIT AND OBEY AND ALL WILL BE WELL First of all, when, in ANY of the world's history, did anything good come of it when the primary message of the enforcement arm of governments is for their people to SUBMIT AND OBEY? CHECK YOUR HISTORY! Second of all, submitting to police usually is the PRELUDE to the beating and, in many cases, your death. We now have COUNTLESS videos and deaths attesting to these facts. Submitting to police does NOT mean "all will be well" at all. Three Things Must Change Immediately Police Misconduct This pathetic, insane legal "reasoning" that cops can kill when scared, even when the fear is all in their head, must cease NOW. Cops are taught to view your humanity as resistance to their authority. The insanity of having cops classify every normal human reaction (pain, fear, emotion, mental or physical problems, inability to comply, a twitch, a turn etc.) as resistance to their authority requiring the use of physical or deadly force must cease NOW. The total, insane corruption of the legal process in handling complaints and deaths caused by police must change NOW. If you don't see the logic or necessity of these 3 changes (like the guy on the left) you need your head examined. Denying the above SANE solutions shows either that power has gone to your head, you are a blind non-thinking follower or you are reality challenged. You have forgotten what the Constitution is. Your thinking is dangerous to any sane, civilized society regardless of what your position in society is. Do you really believe as Citizens in the United States of America that we should have cops that can kill us out of fear even when the fear is all in their head? that we should have cops that can disregard our humanity and view it as resistance to their authority? that we should continue having a corrupt legal process when dealing with abuses and deaths caused by cops? Anyone thinking this is what this country should have is totally irrational. And to have people in power and/or wearing a badge and a gun that think this way is downright dangerous. The pathetic, insane legal "reasoning" that cops can kill when scared, even when the fear is all in their head. Cops will routinely state they are putting their lives on the line every day. Yet, if they can kill when scared, even when that fear is all in their head, they are NOT putting their lives on the line at all. Every Citizen is putting THEIR lives on the line every day when around a cop. How is your life in danger when you can shoot out of fear, even when the fear isn't based on an actual threat? 21st Century policing has put every Citizen in danger of their lives daily with this pathetic legal reasoning that cops can kill out of fear - whether reality based or not. Cops are told to kill and ask questions later. And remember, cops are trained to shoot for one reason only - to kill. One police chief was quoted as saying, "If someone fails to obey the command of an officer they should be shot." Another chief responding to a killing of a kid with a toy gun said, "We expect obedience." The time given in the video for obedience was about 2 seconds. Another police chief stated, "Don't obey an officer's command and ANYTHING can happen." So, "Resistance" (which could be a twitch, a turn, anything at all) is cause for death without trial? The facts are some cops have been killing when their life is not in danger at all! A cop killed a mentally ill kid whose mother had called because he was suicidal. Despite their being no one else in the house and the cop being a distance from the boy and able to step back, killed him as soon as the mentally disturbed kid took a step toward the cop. Citizens have been killed with the cops being yards away and in no danger of their life whatsoever...yet these killings are considered good shoots. Not obeying a command can now be justification for an instant execution...even if you are deaf, mute or blind and regardless of whether you are frozen from terror, mentally or physically sick or unable to comply. THIS IS INSANITY! Citizens have been killed for having no gun, toy guns, because the cop THOUGHT they had a gun, having a water hose, having a game controller, acting "strange", moving too quick, moving too slow, turning too quickly, going for credentials the police asked for and for many other non life threatening reasons A Citizen recently almost lost his life because he pointed a banana in his hand...that's right, a banana! A strategic retreat or de-escalation is now considered cowardice by many of today's police. Control or kill is the name of the game. This isn't policing. This is police being at war with America as their battlefield. All a cop has to say is, "I was in fear of my life" and he can get away with almost anything, including murder! The insanity of having cops classify every normal human reaction (pain, fear, emotion, mental or physical problems, inability to comply, a twitch, a turn etc.) as resistance to their authority. Like soldiers at war on a battlefield, many cops disregard the humanity of American Citizens. Move too quick? SHOOT OR BEAT! Move too slow? SHOOT OR BEAT! Turn too fast, have a handicap, have a mental problem, confused, scared to death? NO MATTER - SHOOT OR BEAT! ANYTHING besides rapid and total submission to their authority is considered "resistance" requiring the use of physical or deadly force. Any exercise of Constitutional rights causes many cops to view you as an enemy of the state. Those that don't believe this either haven't had it happen to them or haven't been paying attention to the endless flow of news stories that continue to surface almost daily. Cops appear willfully clueless regarding normal human reactions when a Citizen faces aggression, a threat to their life and/or the sight of a gun. Cops can kill when scared, even when the fear is all in their head. But the American Citizen is supposed to act with rapid and total submission when faced with aggression, it is clear their life is in danger, death or bodily injury seems imminent or when they see a gun. Normal human reactions to any of these life threatening behaviors might include freezing, panic, charging at or trying to remove the threat in a last ditch attempt to save their lives, running, irrational behavior, etc. NO ONE knows how Citizens will react to aggression or threats to their life until it happens. Cops get to react by killing or beating. Their humanity seems to be all that matters. Should Our Right To Life End Due To Nervous, Scared or Overly Agressive Cops? The Citizen doesn't? Perhaps he wasn't being clear but this came across as arrogant and elitist. I had a problem for a while where I could not get on my knees. This would be viewed by some cops as a green light for abuse or even my on the spot execution had I been given an order to get on my knees. I could go on for an hour about people beat and killed for having legitimate reasons to not respond to a command. Americans are no longer Citizens. They are treated like enemy combatants on a battlefield. Our humanity is irrelevant. The totally insane corruption of the legal process in handling complaints and deaths caused by police. Systemic Racism, Abuse & Oppression Of The Poor: It stands to reason that the race disparity regarding police abuse, arrests and killings must be stopped. Likewise, the oppression of the poor by communities trying to finance themselves via excessive enforcement of petty crimes and traffic violations has to stop also. But the goal of the reforms we seek is not to have "equal opportunity and racially neutral" police beatings, killings and petty enforcement. We want all unnecessary and unreasonable enforcement, beatings and killings stopped. What good will the laudable goals of having a police force staffed to reflect the race of the community and have them all trained in racial sensitivity yet still have them kill, beat and enforce unjustly and with impunity? Unreasonable Legal "Reasoning": The law today can be likened to Silly Putty - creative interpretations abound. Like Silly Putty, law is stretched in all directions and can be bounced from the "spirit" of the law to the "letter" of the law resulting in differing legal opinions despite similar circumstances. In this case it is ruled a cop can be confused on traffic laws opening the door to more harassing police stops. (Whatever happened to "ignorance of the law is no excuse?") There was a recent change to the 5th amendment reducing incentives for cooperating with police and practically making it necessary to invoke the 5th when having ANY encounter with police. Also see this timeline for some historical rulings on the 5th. Think it is a cops job to protect? Think again. Read about the special treatment some police with a much higher rate of domestic abuse receive Read about the special treatment some police receive when caught driving drunk. Rhode Island Law § 12-7-10 Resisting legal or illegal arrest is an open door to have an officer make up a reason to arrest you and needs to be clarified. Also see below where rampant lying, testilying and perjury committed by police is routinely winked at by police, judges, lawyers and prosecutors. The Grand Jury Process: To have prosecutors that have ongoing working relationships, and perhaps even friendships, with police handle the grand jury process is a pathetic joke. Any death of a Citizen at the hands of police, unless the verifiable circumstances clearly justify it, should be handled by an independent prosecutor and/or a trial process should commence. The Blue Wall Of Silence: (also called Blue Code or Blue Shield) The common mantra that most cops are good is true but MUST be tempered with this fact - most cops also will not report misconduct of their departments resulting in all police departments being complicit with wrongdoing. This MUST change. Special Bill Of Rights: Many areas have a special bill of rights for police making it harder to discipline or get rid of bad cops. Most all cops have unions and civil remedies available to them and these bills have to be either drastically altered or eliminated. James Vincent, President of the Providence branch of the NAACP said, "Right now there's a policeman's bill of rights that some officers use to protect themselves from being punished...There's a tiny minority of police officers, I call them bad apples, who feel they can do whatever they want." No Citizen Oversight: We need Citizen involvement regarding oversight and complaints against police. The secrecy must stop. Police would laugh at any Citizens saying they can police themselves yet insist they be allowed to do just that. Lying, Testilying And Perjury: While cops are allowed to lie under certain circumstances (See Can Cops Lie?), false reports, lies, testilying and perjury are an epidemic in policing and cause immeasurable suffering affecting countless lives. Some cops seem to think they have a green light to lie about everything. We have countless examples of cops lying about the law, lying to take a stop to the next level, lying saying it is illegal to film them etc. Police lie so much the legal profession calls it testilying. Given the importance of truth in policing added to the fact lives can be drastically and negatively affected by lying cops, all cops should be prosecuted, punished, fired and and/or personally sued for lying, whatever is appropriate for the situation. The current attitude in the legal system to the systemic problem of lying, perjuring cops is, "So what?" Add that to the problem of cops planting evidence...do you see the problem YET? One way to protect against police misconduct is cop cams. Read Cops, Lying, Testilying And Perjury to see how prevalent this problem is. Erosion Of Civil Rights: Slowly but surely our government, case law and the US Supreme Court are chipping away at civil rights by carving out more and more exceptions to them. This has opened the door for a lot of the police misconduct that has given rise to the latest uprising. A prime example of what happens when civil rights erode was the stop and frisk practices in New York. Unconstitutional - The War on Our Civil Liberties ? So America, DO THE MATH. First we have police able to kill when afraid even when the fear is all in their head. Add that to training that teaches them to disregard normal human reactions and consider them as resistance to their authority. Add special bills of rights making it hard to get rid of wrong doers. Add the Blue Wall Of Silence and a legal system that considers rampant perjury of cops as inconsequential. Add to that prosecutors who work and are friendly with police being in charge of prosecuting their wrongdoing and all the other things mentioned in this article. DO YOU SEE THE PROBLEM YET? WAKE UP AMERICA !! You may be fortunate to live in an area where there is very little police misconduct. If you are rich, white or live in certain areas it is very easy to pretend, deny or imagine that all these things in this article aren't true. Well, they are true and we need to wake up FAST. You may think, "The cops I know would never do this." You may be right. Thank God most cops DON'T do these things. But, do you want a system in place that ALLOWS for the misconduct and killings addressed here? Do you want them to be able to conduct themselves in the manner described here? THAT is what we have now and THAT is why changes are long overdue. A Citizenry and law enforcement that are mutually cooperative is essential to any civilized society. Individual rights and liberties are equally essential. This article is not intending to encourage being uncooperative with law enforcement. We encourage all Citizens to assist in any way they can to contribute to a healthy, safe, civilized society. Given that, this article is written because of two very harsh realities: Eroding civil rights and a badly broken justice system and Law enforcement that sometimes act outside of the public interest and with disregard for constitutional law and individual rights This article is trying to strike a healthy balance regarding police encounters It is unfortunate that sometimes an encounter with the police can turn into a nightmare. While we all hope police are properly trained, we are at a point where we have to educate the public on how to deal with some police officers that may be nervous, irrational or overly aggressive. Know your rights, be respectful and stay calm. The following information is NOT legal advice as no one involved with this website is an attorney. Nothing here should be construed or relied on as legal advice. However, this is information that is commonly said by attorneys and public safety officials on the media level. A note to those that are police officers: While many say they became police officers because they wanted to help people, the reality is most became police officers because they wanted power over people. This desire for power over others is, in and of itself, enough to make anyone dangerous. Human beings have an inherent weakness towards the abuse of power. Don't think you are immune...you are not. Regarding Police Encounters In Routine Traffic Stops Once you become aware you are being told to pull over, wave and let the police know via hand gestures that you acknowledge them without speeding up. Don't cause an accident or endanger by trying to stop too quickly, drive erratically or pull over in a bad spot. Give hand gestures if necessary that you are driving ahead to pull over. Stop slowly and safely. Stopping too quickly or driving irrationally to attempt to pull over is a common problem with routine traffic stops. If it is an unmarked car and you believe you are in danger, you can call on a cell phone to tell the local police you are unsure who is trying to get you to stop so they can communicate this to the officer. Once stopped, if it is dark, immediately turn on your interior lights. Turn off the engine, roll down the window and keep your hands on the wheel of the car where they can be seen. If asked to get something say something like, "I have to go into my glove compartment [or reach into a pocket], can you please shine your light here." Do not get out of the car unless told to. Regarding More Serious Police Encounters: First - Remember These Two Lines: I am going to remain silent. I want to see a lawyer. I do not consent to this search. When dealing with the police, keep your hands in view and don't make sudden movements. Avoid movement that would put you behind them. Nervous cops are dangerous cops. Also, never touch the police or their equipment (vehicles, flashlights, animals, etc.) - you can get beat up and charged with assault. The police do not decide your charges; they can only make recommendations. The prosecutor is the only person who can actually charge you. Remember this the next time the cops start rattling off all the charges they're supposedly "going to give you." Interrogation isn't always bright lights and rubber hoses - usually it's just a conversation. Whenever the cops ask you anything besides your name and address, it's legally safest to (respectfully) say these Magic Words: "I am going to remain silent. I want to see a lawyer." This invokes the rights which protect you from interrogation. When you say this, the cops (and all other law enforcement officials) are legally required to stop asking you questions. They probably won't stop, so just repeat the Magic Words or remain silent until they catch on. Remember, anything you say to the authorities can and will be used against you and your friends in court. There's no way to predict what information the police might try to use or how they'd use it. Plus, the police often misquote or lie altogether about what was said. So say only the Magic Words and let all the cops and witnesses know that this is your policy. Make sure that when you're arrested with other people, the rest of the group knows the Magic Words and promises to use them. One of the jobs of cops is to get information out of people, and they usually don't have any scruples about how they do it. Cops are legally allowed to lie when they're investigating, and they are trained to be manipulative. The only thing you should say to cops, other than identifying yourself, is the Magic Words: "I am going to remain silent. I want to see a lawyer." Here are some lies they will tell you: "You're not a suspect - just help us understand what happened here and then you can go." "If you don't answer my questions, I'll have no choice but to arrest you. Do you want to go to jail?" "If you don't answer my questions, I'm going to charge you with resisting arrest." "All of your friends have cooperated and we let them go home. You're the only one left." Cops are sneaky buggers and there are lots of ways they can trick you into talking. Here are some scams they'll pull: Good Cop/ Bad Cop: Bad cop is aggressive and menacing, while good cop is nice, friendly, and familiar (usually good cop is the same race and gender as you). The idea is bad cop scares you so bad you are desperately looking for a friend. Good cop is that friend. The cops will tell you that your friends ratted on you so that you will snitch on them. Meanwhile, they tell your friends the same thing. If anyone breaks and talks, you all go down. The cops will tell you that they have all the evidence they need to convict you and that if you "take responsibility" and confess the judge will be impressed by your honesty and go easy on you. What they really mean is: "we don't have enough evidence yet, please confess." Jail is a very isolating and intimidating place. It is really easy to believe what the cops tell you. Insist upon speaking with a lawyer before you answer any questions or sign anything. The Golden Rule: Never trust a cop. The police do not have to read you your rights (also known as the Miranda warnings). Miranda applies when there is: (a) an interrogation (b) by a police officer of other agent of law enforcement (c) while the suspect is in police custody (you do not have to be formally arrested to be "in custody"). Even when all these conditions are met, the police intentionally violate Miranda. And though your rights have been violated, what you say can be used against you. For this reason, it is better not to wait for the cops to tell you your Miranda rights. Know what your rights are so you can invoke them by saying the Magic Words, "I am going to remain silent. I want to see a lawyer." If you've been arrested and realize that you have started answering questions, don't panic. Just re-invoke your rights by saying the Magic Words again. Don't let them trick you into thinking that because you answered some of their questions, you have to answer all of them. There are three basic types of encounters with the police: Conversation, Detention, and Arrest. The "conversational" encounter: When the cops are trying to get information, but don't have enough evidence to detain or arrest you, they'll try to weasel some information out of you. They may call this a "casual encounter" or a "friendly conversation". If you talk to them, you may give them the information they need to arrest you or your friends. In most situations, it's better and safer not to talk to cops. The detention encounter: Police can detain you only if they have reasonable suspicion (see below) that you are involved in a crime. Detention means that, though you aren't arrested, you can't leave. Detention is supposed to last a short time and they aren't supposed to move you. During detention, the police can pat you down and go into your bag to make sure you don't have any weapons. They aren't supposed to go into your pockets unless they feel a weapon. If the police are asking questions, ask if you are being detained. If not, leave and say nothing else to them. If you are being detained, you may want to ask why. Then you should say the Magic Words: "I am going to remain silent. I want a lawyer" and nothing else. A detention can easily turn into arrest. If the police are detaining you and they get information that you are involved in a crime, they will arrest you, even if it has nothing to do with your detention. For example, if someone gets pulled over for speeding (detained) and the cop sees drugs in the car, the cops will arrest her for possession of the drugs even though it has nothing to do with her getting pulled over. Cops have two reasons to detain you: 1) they are writing you a citation (a traffic ticket, for example), or 2) they want to arrest you but they don't have enough information yet to do so. The arrest: Police can arrest you only if they have probable cause (see below) that you are involved in a crime. When you are arrested, the cops can search you to the skin and go through you car and any belongings. By law, an officer strip searching you must be the same gender as you. If the police come to your door with an arrest warrant, go outside and lock the door behind you. Cops are allowed to search any room you go into, so don't go back into the house for any reason. If they have an arrest warrant, hiding won't help because they are allowed to force their way in if they know you are there. It's usually better to just go with them without giving them an opportunity to search. Reasonable suspicion must be based on more than a hunch - cops must be able to put their suspicion into words. For example, cops can't just stop someone and say, "She looked like she was up to something." They need to be more specific, like, "She was standing under the overpass staring up at some graffiti that hadn't been there 2 hours ago. She had the same graffiti pattern written on her backpack. I suspected that she had put up the graffiti." Cops need more proof to say they have a probable cause than to say they have a reasonable suspicion. For example, "A store owner called to report someone matching her description tagging a wall across the street. As I drove up to the store, I saw her running away spattered with paint and carrying a spray can in her hand." Never consent to a search! If the police try to search your house, car, backpack, pockets, etc. say the Magic Words: "I do not consent to this search." This may not stop them from forcing their way in and searching anyway, but if they search you illegally, they probably won't be able to use the evidence against you in court. You have nothing to lose from refusing to consent to a search and lots to gain. Do not physically resist cops when they are trying to search because you could get hurt and charged with resisting arrest or assault. Just keep repeating the Magic Words so that the cops and all witnesses know that this is your policy. Be careful about casual consent. That is, if you are stopped by the cops and you get out of the car but don't close the door, they can search the car and claim that they though you were indicating consent by leaving the door ajar. Also, if you say, "I'd rather you didn't search," they can claim that you were reluctantly giving them permission to search. Always just say the Magic Words: "I do not consent to this search." If the cops have a search warrant, nothing changes - it's legally safest to just say the Magic Words. Again, you have nothing to lose from refusing to consent to a search, and lots to gain if the search warrant is incorrect or invalid in some way. If they do have a search warrant, ask to read it. A valid warrant must have a recent date (usually not more than a couple of weeks), the correct address, and a judge's or magistrate's signature; some warrants indicate the time of day the cops can search. You should say the Magic Words whether or not the search warrant appears correct. The same goes for any government official who tries to search you, your belongings, or your house. Undercover cops sometimes infiltrate political organizations. They can lie about being cops even if asked directly. Undercover cops can even break the law (narcs get hazard pay for doing drugs as part of their cover) and encourage others to do so as well. This is not legally entrapment. The essence of the Magic Words "I'm keeping my mouth shut until I talk to a lawyer" not only applies to police but also to the FBI, INS, CIA, even IRS. If you want to be nice and polite, tell them that you don't wish to speak with them until you've spoken with your lawyer, or that you won't answer questions without a lawyer present. If you are being investigated as a result of your political activity, you can call the National Lawyers Guild at (415) 582-1055; they will help you find a lawyer you can talk to. Whenever you interact with or observe the police, always write down what is said and who said it. Write down the cops' names and badge numbers and the names and contact information of any witnesses. Record everything that happens. If you are expecting a lot of police contact, get in the habit of carrying a small tape recorder and a camera with you. Be careful - cops don't like people taking notes, especially if the cops are planning on doing something illegal. Observing them and documenting their actions may have very different results; for example, it may cause them to respond aggressively, or it may prevent them from abusing you or your friends. People deal with police in all kinds of circumstances. You must make an individual decision about how you will interact with law enforcement. It is important to know your legal rights, but it is also important for you to decide when and how to use them in order to best protect yourself.

The USA has long facilitated regime change to support its own strategic and business interests. A sovereign nation is a nation that has one centralized government that has the power to govern a specific geographic area. Also A Sovereignty Nation or Government is the power of a state to do everything necessary to govern itself, such as making, executing, and applying laws; imposing and collecting taxes; making war and peace; and forming treaties or engaging in commerce with foreign nations. Throughout its history, the United States has used its military and covert operations to overthrow or prop up foreign governments in the name of preserving U.S. strategic and business interests. United States signed some 368 treaties with various Indigenous people across the North American continent. The treaties were based on the fundamental idea that each tribe was an independent nation, with their own right to self-determination and self-rule. But as white settlers began moving onto Native American lands, this idea came into conflict with the relentless pace of westward expansion—resulting in many broken promises on the part of the U.S. government. So On the 17th of April, 1961, a bridge of Cuban exiles landed on the coast of the Bay of Pigs. Their aim was to instigate a popular uprising and to overthrow the revolutionary government of Fidel Castro. The attempt was a dismal failure. This film traces the course of events from March, 1960, when recruiting for a Cuban exile force started, up to and including the invasion itself. In the process it examines such aspects as the role of the C.I.A., the attitude of President Kennedy and the reasons for failure. (U.S.A. - N.B.C. Television, made by N.B.C. News, edited and distributed by Encyclopedia Britannica Films, B&W live action 1964) U.S. intervention in foreign governments began with attacks on and displacement of sovereign tribal nations in North America. In the 1890s, this type of imperialist activity, fueled by the idea of Manifest Destiny, expanded overseas when the U.S. overthrew the Hawaiian Kingdom and annexed its islands. As America annexed more overseas territories for its empire, it began to intervene frequently in other countries’ governments—particularly those in its backyard. “During the early 20th century, the United States intervened relentlessly in the Caribbean Basin,” says Stephen Kinzer, a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs at Brown University and author of Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq. After World War II, the United States began using the newly established Central Intelligence Agency to overthrow governments all over the world in a more covert manner. U.S. leaders rationalized many of these interventions as necessary for preventing the spread of communism according to the Cold War domino theory. Similarly, 21st-century leaders would later defend U.S. Middle East interventions as necessary for fighting terrorism. 1893: Hawaii In January 1893, a small group of white business and plantation owners, with the support of a U.S. envoy to Hawaii (Native spelling: Hawai'i), led a coup d'état that ousted the Hawaiian monarch Queen Liliʻuokalani from power. This came six years after the Queen's predecessor, her brother King David Kalakaua, was forced to sign a new constitution at gunpoint that stripped him of most of his powers and shifted them to members of the white planter class. The coup leaders immediately pushed for the U.S. to annex Hawaii, which it did in 1898. The islands remained a U.S. territory until 1959, when Hawaii became America's 50th state. In 1993, a century after the coup, the U.S. government formally apologized to Native Hawaiians for overthrowing their monarchy and annexing 1.8 million acres of land “without the consent of or compensation to the Native Hawaiian people…or their sovereign government.” 1933: Cuba In 1898, the same year the U.S. annexed Hawaii, its victory in the Spanish-American War also gave it control of Guam, Puerto Rico and the Philippines as U.S. territories, as well as an excuse to begin a military occupation of Cuba. After President Theodore Roosevelt asserted America's right to intervene militarily in Latin America in 1904-5, the U.S. began to do so more frequently in the Caribbean Basin countries, including the Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, Mexico, Haiti, Honduras—and Cuba. After recognizing Cuba as an independent nation in 1902, the U.S. withdrew its military from the country with the caveat that it would still intervene militarily to protect American interests in the future. Over the next three decades, the U.S. frequently invaded Cuba and other Caribbean countries in the so-called “Banana Wars,” to help quash labor strikes and revolutions that threatened U.S.-owned sugar, fruit and coffee businesses. In 1933, it backed military leader Fulgencio Batista’s coup to overthrow the Cuban government. After Fidel Castro violently ousted Batista and established the Western hemisphere’s first communist regime, President John F. Kennedy attempted to overthrow Castro’s government in the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion. This failed coup not only represented America’s ongoing imperialist attitude toward its southern neighbors; it also showcased a newer interventionist arm: the CIA. 1953: Iran After the United States established the CIA in 1947, it began to use the agency to overthrow or prop up foreign governments in a much more covert way. Before WWII, the United States didn’t try to hide its interventions in foreign governments. But with the onset of the Cold War, the United States became much more concerned about hiding its actions from the Soviet Union, Kinzer says. “In the 1950s, at the height of the Cold War, it was a priority for President Eisenhower and [Director of Central Intelligence] Allen Dulles to assure that America always had plausible deniability,” he says. “Eisenhower was probably the last president who believed that you could do these things and nobody would ever find out.” In 1953, the CIA orchestrated a coup of Iran’s democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, in order to consolidate power with Iran’s shah (or king), Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Declassified CIA documents claim the coup—known internally as Operation Ajax—was designed to prevent possible “Soviet aggression” in Iran, but Iranian-American historian Ervand Abrahamian has argued the real motivation had more to do with securing U.S. oil interests. 1954: Guatemala In 1954, the CIA orchestrated another coup of a democratically elected leader: Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz. The CIA coup, code-named Operation PBSuccess, replaced the president with military dictator Carlos Castillo Armas in the name of stopping the spread of communism. However, the CIA’s main motivation for ousting Árbenz was the fear that his land reforms would threaten the interests of the American-owned United Fruit Company, which owned 42 percent of the nation’s land and paid no taxes. High-ranking officials in the Eisenhower administration had close ties to the company: Secretary of State John Foster Dulles had worked for United Fruit’s U.S. law firm, and his brother, CIA director Allen Dulles, sat on its board. The CIA continued toppling Latin American governments; in the first year of the Kennedy administration, it backed an assassination in the Dominican Republic and, under Lyndon B. Johnson, it executed a 1964 coup in Brazil. 1960-1965: Congo In 1960, the Republic of the Congo (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) declared its independence from Belgium and democratically elected its first prime minister, Patrice Lumumba. Shortly after he assumed power, President Joseph Kasavubu pushed him out of office amid a Belgian military invasion. Worried that the ensuing unrest provided fertile ground for Soviet incursion, the CIA encouraged and assisted attempts to kill Lumumba, arguing he was a communist leader akin to Castro. The CIA helped facilitate Lumumba’s capture in 1960 and assassination in 1961. This action precipitated the Congo Crisis (1960–1965), a period in which military leader Mobutu Sese Seko consolidated power in the country. In 1965, the CIA supported Mobutu’s coup to take over the Republic of the Congo in the name of preventing the spread of communism. Mobutu became a dictator who ruled the country until 1997. 1963: South Vietnam The Pentagon Papers, chock full of damning revelations about America’s war in Vietnam, caused a sensation when The New York Times published them in 1971. One revelation was that the CIA had funded and encouraged the 1963 coup against, and assassination of, the president of South Vietnam, Ngo Dinh Diem. By 1963, the United States had sent thousands of U.S. soldiers to Vietnam to fight the northern communist government led by President Ho Chi Minh. The U.S. initially supported Diem because he was fighting the north. However, Diem’s persecution of Buddhists made him an unpopular ruler, leading the Kennedy administration to doubt Diem’s ability to win the war. The coup and Diem’s assassination took place in early November 1963, just a few weeks before Kennedy’s assassination. 1973: Chile When Chile elected socialist ​​Salvador Allende as president in 1970, U.S. President Richard Nixon originally wanted to block him from taking office, or else mount a coup soon after Allende became president. On Nixon’s orders, the CIA began supporting different Chilean groups plotting to overthrow the new socialist president. In 1973, military leader Augusto Pinochet staged a coup that ousted Allende. Pinochet assumed his dictatorship the following year, ruling as Chile’s president until 1990. Whether the CIA was directly involved in Pinochet’s coup is still contested. However, the agency’s support of earlier coup plots contributed to political instability that Pinochet took advantage of to seize power. In a transcribed phone conversation between Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger about Pinochet’s coup, Kissinger complained that the U.S. media wasn’t celebrating the coup, complaining that “in the Eisenhower period, we would be heroes.” “Well, we didn't—as you know—our hand doesn't show on this one,” Nixon responded. Kissinger clarified, “I mean we helped them…created the conditions as great as possible.” 1981-90: Nicaragua The United States has a long history of meddling in Nicaragua. Between 1912 and 1933, the U.S. military occupied the country. Between 1981 and 1986, President Ronald Reagan’s administration secretly and illegally sold arms to Iran in order to fund Contras, a group the CIA had recruited and organized to fight the socialist Sandinista government led by Daniel Ortega. In 1986, details of the Iran-Contra Affair became public, resulting in congressional investigations. Ortega’s Sandinista government ended in 1990 with the election of opposition candidate Violeta Chamorro as president amid reports that the United States had provided funding to help her win. 2001: Afghanistan When the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001, it established an interim government led by Hamid Karzai to replace the warring Taliban government and the oppositional Northern Alliance. Karzai’s rule continued in 2002, when he became head of Afghanistan’s transitional government, and in 2004, when he became president of the U.S.-backed Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. He was succeeded in 2014 by Ashraf Ghani. Ghani was president until the Taliban retook power in 2021, when the U.S. formally ended its war in Afghanistan. 2003: Iraq In 2003, the United States invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein’s government. As in Afghanistan, the U.S. attempted to establish an interim, transitional and more permanent government. The United States formally ended its war in Iraq in 2011. Since then, the country’s government structure has remained in flux. Foreigners Were Target in China's Bloody Boxer Rebellion of 1900 In August 1900, after nearly two months of the siege, thousands of allied American, British, Russian, Japanese, Italian, German, French and Austro-Hungarian troops moved out of northern China to take Beijing and put down the rebellion, which they accomplished. Who exactly were the Boxers? They were members of a secret society made up mostly of peasants in northern China known as I-ho-ch'uan ("Righteous and Harmonious Fists") and were called the "Boxers" by the Western press; members of the secret society practiced boxing and calisthenic rituals that they thought would make them impervious to bullets and attacks, and this led to their unusual but memorable name. At the end of the 19th century, Western countries and Japan had major control over economic policies in China and had significant territorial and commercial control in northern China. The peasants in this area were suffering economically, and they blamed this on the foreigners who were present in their country. It was this anger that gave rise to the violence that would go down in history as the Boxer Rebellion. Beginning in the late 1890s, the Boxers began attacking Christian missionaries, Chinese Christians and foreigners in northern China. These attacks eventually spread to the capital, Beijing, in June 1900, when the Boxers destroyed railroad stations and churches and laid siege to the area where foreign diplomats lived. It is estimated that that death toll included several hundred foreigners and several thousand Chinese Christians. The Qing Dynasty's Empress Dowager Tzu’u Hzi backed the Boxers, and the day after the Boxers began the siege on foreign diplomats, she declared war on all foreign countries that had diplomatic ties with China. Meanwhile, a multinational foreign force was gearing up in northern China. In August 1900, after nearly two months of the siege, thousands of allied American, British, Russian, Japanese, Italian, German, French and Austro-Hungarian troops moved out of northern China to take Beijing and put down the rebellion, which they accomplished. The Boxer Rebellion formally ended in September 1901 with the signing of the Boxer Protocol, which mandated the punishment of those involved in the rebellion and required China to pay reparations of $330 million to the countries affected. The Boxer Rebellion weakened the Qing dynasty, which was the last imperial dynasty of China and ruled the country from 1644 to 1912. It was this dynasty that established the modern territory of China. The diminished state of the Qing dynasty after the Boxer Rebellion opened the door to the Republican Revolution of 1911 that overthrew the emperor and made China a republic. The Republic of China, including mainland China and Taiwan, existed from 1912 to 1949. It fell to the Chinese Communists in 1949, with mainland China officially becoming the People's Republic of China and Taiwan the headquarters of the Republic of China. But no peace treaty has ever been signed, and significant tensions remain. Philippine Insurrection, 1899 to 1902 After the Spanish-American War (1898), the Philippines were given to the US. President McKinley felt Germany would take over the Philippines if the US did not. Many Filipinos wanted independence, and fighting began in 1899 and continued until 1902. Philippine–American War 1902 On June 2, 1899, the First Philippine Republic officially declared war against the United States. The Philippine President Emilio Aguinaldo was captured on March 23, 1901, and the war was officially declared ended by the American government on July 2, 1902, with a victory for the United States. The US conquest of the Philippines, 1898-1902 Filipino casualties on the first day of the war An account of the American takeover of the Philippines, beginning with the US defeating Spain, and ending with it brutally suppressing Filipino resistance. Philippine-American War, war between the United States and Filipino revolutionaries from 1899 to 1902, an insurrection that may be seen as a continuation of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish rule. It began after the United States assumed sovereignty of the Philippines following the defeat of Spain in the Spanish-American War. Although an end to the insurrection was declared in 1902, sporadic fighting continued for several years thereafter. There had been numerous quasi-religious uprisings in the Philippines during the more than 300 years of colonial rule, but the late 19th-century writings of José Rizal and others helped stimulate a more broad-based movement for Philippine independence. Spain was unwilling to reform its colonial government, and armed rebellion broke out in 1896. Rizal, who had advocated reform but not revolution, was shot for sedition on December 30, 1896; his martyrdom fueled the revolution, led by the young general Emilio Aguinaldo. Another movement for independence from Spanish rule was underway in Cuba, meanwhile. In March 1898, following the destruction of the USS Maine in Havana a month earlier, the United States sent an ultimatum to Spain demanding it accept U.S. arbitration and eventually relinquish its control of Cuba. In preparation for the likelihood of war against Spain, Assistant Secretary of the Navy Theodore Roosevelt placed the U.S. Asiatic squadron in Hong Kong on alert. When war was declared in April, Commodore George Dewey sailed from Hong Kong and defeated the Spanish fleet in Manila Bay on the morning of May 1, but he could not occupy Manila until ground troops arrived three months later. In the meantime, on June 12, the Filipinos declared independence and proclaimed a provisional republic with Aguinaldo as president. Within days, on the other side of the Pacific, the American Anti-Imperialist League had begun to take shape. This organization, which opposed American involvement in the Philippines, grew into a mass movement that drew support from across the political spectrum. Its members included luminaries such as social reformer Jane Addams, industrialist Andrew Carnegie, philosopher William James, and author Mark Twain. On August 13 Manila fell after a bloodless “battle.” Spanish Gov. Fermín Jáudenes had secretly arranged a surrender after a mock show of resistance to salvage his honour. American troops were in possession of the city, but Filipino insurgents controlled the rest of the country. The Treaty of Paris(1898), signed by representatives of Spain and the United States in December, transferred Philippine sovereignty from Spain to the United States. But the leaders of the nascent Philippine Republic, who were in actual control of the entire archipelago except Manila, did not recognize U.S. sovereignty over the islands. The United States, meanwhile, rejected Filipino claims of independence. Conflict was inevitable. On the night of February 4, 1899, shooting erupted on the outskirts of Manila. Morning found the Filipinos, who had fought bravely, even recklessly, defeated at all points. While the fighting was in progress, Aguinaldo issued a proclamation of war against the United States. Anti-imperialist sentiment was strong in the United States, and on February 6 the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty that concluded the Spanish-American War by a single vote. U.S. reinforcements were immediately sent to the Philippines. Antonio Luna, the ablest commander among the Filipinos, was given charge of their military operations but seems to have been greatly hampered by the jealousy and distrust of Aguinaldo, which he fully returned. Luna was murdered, and on March 31 the rebel capital of Malolos was captured by U.S. forces. In March 1900 U.S. Pres. William McKinley convened the Second Philippine Commission to create a civil government for the Philippines (the existence of Aguinaldo’s Philippine Republic was conveniently ignored). On April 7 McKinley instructed commission chairman William Howard Taft to “bear in mind that the government which they are establishing is designed not for our satisfaction, or for the expression of our theoretical views, but for the happiness, peace, and prosperity of the people of the Philippine Islands.” While nothing explicit was said about independence, these instructions were later often cited as supporting such a goal. Meanwhile, the Filipino government had fled northward. In November 1899 the Filipinos resorted to guerrilla warfare, with all its devastating consequences. The major operations of the insurrection were conducted in Luzon, and, throughout them, the U.S. Army was assisted materially by indigenous Macabebe scouts, who had previously served the Spanish regime and then transferred that loyalty to the United States. The organized insurrection effectively ended with the capture of Aguinaldo on March 23, 1901, by U.S. Brig. Gen. Frederick Funston. After learning of the location of Aguinaldo’s secret headquarters from a captured courier, Funston personally led an audacious mission into the mountains of northern Luzon. He and a handful of his officers posed as prisoners of war, marching under the guard of a column of Macabebe scouts who were disguised as rebels. Aguinaldo, who had been expecting reinforcements, welcomed the lead elements of the force only to be stunned by a demand to surrender. When Funston arrived, Aguinaldo remarked, “Is this not some joke?” before being led back to Manila. Although Aguinaldo pledged his allegiance to the United States and called for an end to hostilities, the guerrilla campaign continued with unabated ferocity. Brig. Gen. Jacob F. Smith, enraged by a massacre of U.S. troops, responded with retaliatory measures of such indiscriminate brutality that he was court-martialed and forced to retire. After the surrender of Filipino Gen. Miguel Malvar in Samar on April 16, 1902, the American civil government regarded the remaining guerrillas as mere bandits, though the fighting continued. About a thousand guerrillas under Simeón Ola were not defeated until late 1903, and in Batangas province, south of Manila, troops commanded by Macario Sakay resisted capture until as late as 1906. The last organized resistance to U.S. power took place on Samar from 1904 to 1906. There the rebels’ tactic of burning pacified villages contributed to their own defeat. Although an unconnected insurgency campaign by Moro bands on Mindanao continued sporadically until 1913, the United States had gained undisputed control of the Philippines until. On December 8, 1941, Japan invaded the Philippines. A mix of local and American forces, most without combat experience, rushed to hold off the professional veterans of imperial Japan. Later Japan officially surrendered aboard the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2, 1945 and it retained possession of the islands until July 03 1946. The 4th of July used to be considered an important national holiday in the Philippines. Not because it was the United States’ birthday, but because it was Philippine Independence Day in 1946. The human cost of the war 1902-06 was significant. An estimated 20,000 Filipino combatants were killed, and more than 200,000 civilians perished as a result of combat, hunger, or disease. Of the 4,300 Americans lost, some 1,500 were killed in action, while nearly twice that number succumbed to disease. Definition of a state: A territory built by conquest in which one culture, one set of ideals and one set of laws have been imposed by force or threat over diverse nations by a civilian and military bureaucracy. States are ephemeral and originate and disappear with the stroke of a pen (e.g. the end of the U.S.S.R., December 25, 1991). Definition of an independent state. A specialized type of political organization characterized by a full-time, specialized, professional work force of tax-collectors, soldiers, policemen, bureaucrats and the like that exercises supreme political authority over a defined territory with a permanent population, independent from any enduring external political control and possessing a local predominance of coercive power (always supplemented with moral and remunerative incentives as well) great enough to maintain general obedience to its laws or commands within its territorial borders. The first known states were created in ancient times in Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, China, Mexico and Peru, but it is only in relatively modern times that states have almost completely displaced alternative "stateless" forms of political organization of societies all over the planet. (Roving bands of hunter-gatherers and even fairly sizable and complex tribal societies based on herding or agriculture have existed without any full-time specialized state organization, and these "stateless" forms of political organization have in fact prevailed for all of the prehistory and much of the history of the human species.)

Real Illuminati Media CIA Operation Mockingbird Was A Covert U.S. Government Operation Run By The CIA To Implant Pro-US Propaganda In American Media And Front Organizations. Part 1 ! The greatest tool of control of the Illuminati is without a doubt the mainstream media, television and the entertainment industry. The Illuminati completely destroyed all morals in society worldwide by using puppet politicians, demonic Celebrities, and Media Puppets to achieve their goal of total mind control of the masses. Mass Media Mind Control I have had wide and varied interests since a very young age and have loved learning all of my life. Simply, I believe life should be lived as a great adventure of growth and learning in every way. In science, my interests started in crystallography and minerals and progressed through the several branches of science into politics, philosophy, religion and all things esoteric. What is Mind Control? In the late 1980s, the most interesting research I began exploring was on mind effects or, more popularly, mind control. My interest grew out of the misuses of the information released in the Church Committee hearings of the 1970s dealing with the CIA programs in this area. At the same time, the positive possibilities for these new technologies were also exciting. Stimulating optimum human performance, accelerated learning, meditation, relaxation, and focus could all be improved. In fact, even so-called altered states could be enhanced or even stimulated. The most fascinating possibilities, however, were even more startling. The idea that perhaps we could stimulate what is now referred to in some literature as “anomalous human capability” or, in the past referred to as ESP or extrasensory perceptions, may be possible. In fact, this may be the next evolution of humans on earth as many of us are acknowledging and science is proving. Control of the Mind and Body The predominant brain wave frequencies indicate the kind of activity taking place in the brain. There are four basic groups of brain wave frequencies that are associated with most mental activity. The first, beta waves, (13-35 Hertz or pulses per second) are associated with normal activity. The high end of this range is associated with stress or agitated states that can impair thinking and reasoning skills. The second group, alpha waves (8-12 Hertz), can indicate more relaxation. Alpha frequencies are ideal for learning and focused life form energy. The third, theta waves (4-7 Hertz), indicate mental imagery, access to memories and internal mental focus. This state is often associated with young children, behavioral modification and sleep/dream states. The last, ultra slow, delta waves (.5-3 Hertz), are found when a person is in deep sleep. The general rule is that the brain’s predominant wave frequency will be lowest, in terms of pulses per second, when relaxed, and highest when people are most alert or agitated. What is Entrainment? External stimulation of the brain by electromagnetic means can cause the brain to be entrained or locked into phase with an external signal generator. Predominant brain waves can be driven or pushed into new frequency patterns by external stimulation. In other words, the external signal driver or impulse generator entrains the brain, overriding the normal frequencies, and causing changes in the brain waves. Changes in brain waves cause changes in brain chemistry; which then cause changes in brain outputs in the form of thoughts, emotions or physical condition. As you are driven, so you arrive – brain manipulation can be either beneficial or detrimental to the individual being impacted depending on the level of knowledge or the intentions of the person controlling the technology. Is it Possible to Train Consciousness? Consciousness training is also a big theme in cults, religious organizations, and others pursuing the “new age.” Science has now gained a greater understanding of how the mind and brain work so that what used to take years, or even decades, to achieve, can now be mastered in weeks, days or even minutes. For instance, in 1996 a method and apparatus for the use in achieving alpha and theta brainwave states and effecting positive emotional states in humans were developed. Two years later another patent was issued which could create desired consciousness states: In the training of an individual to replicate such states of consciousness without further audio stimulation, such states may be transferred from one human being to another through the imposition of one person’s EEG, superimposed on desired stereo signals and onto another individual, by inducement of a binaural beat phenomenon. Is Thought Transference Possible? This is interesting in that it speaks to the ideas alluded to earlier by the military in changing the memory of a person by imposing computer-manipulated signals which would integrate with the normal memory of a person. The possibility of abuse is obvious and the opportunity for personal advancement is also great. Consider the possibility of gaining education by the transfer of data directly into the human brain by these new methods rather than the standard methods of learning. A serious consideration in developing these types of memory transfer systems will be the fact that they bypass normal intellectual filters – they are deposited into the brain as fact, without question or careful consideration. What happens when new information conflicts with existing information? Would it be possible to include hidden information meant to unduly influence things like religious beliefs, politics or consumption of goods and services or politics? Ethical Questions Abound The possibilities are immense and the ethical and moral questions surrounding these matters equally large. We can no longer avoid the debate; in fact, the debate is lagging far behind the scientific advancements. In the interim, there are some simple things we could all do to enhance our own, or our children’s, learning capacity by applying simple and available knowledge. For instance: “researchers at the Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory at University of California, Irvine, have determined that 10 minutes of listening to a Mozart piano sonata raised the measurable IQ of college students by up to nine points.” This is a simple thing of great use to anyone seeking self- improvement as an example. There are several articles and materials that speak to the various ways that these technologies can be applied and used beyond the scope of this article. Let’s get to the media applications. The Use of Media Radio, TV, the Internet, the power grid, cell systems or any other electromagnetic carrier can be used to carry a signal that will influence the behaviors of most people in close proximity to the signal. What such signals can do is cause a person, for instance, to drop into a light altered state. Like when people come home from work, sit in front of the TV and watch the nightly news feed. Within a few moments someone begins saying to you, “honey, dinners ready.” They hear nothing… they are no longer watching the “programming;” they are being programmed with the latest values, beliefs, and ideas being pressed into the consciousness of most people through media. By oscillating a signal in a certain way, emotional states can easily be reformed so that the reaction to the advertising, political propaganda or “news” is as predicted by those generating it across the broad population as intended by them. In other words, it is about control and manipulation. It is really very simple. People in psychology understand the Frequency Following Response (FFR). When applied to advertise or any other media, it is incredibly compelling. Refined Control Tactics Much more can be done with this technology in terms of the information density that can be sent in on such carriers. The objective of many military planners is to be able to even transfer thought and memory sets. These kinds of technology when applied to media particularly when coupled with mass surveillance of the population this allows those in control of such technologies to have profound effects on a highly individualized basis. This delivery system can be tailored to an individual person to have specific influences on that individual personality type and subtype. The predictability of behavior for the target of the technology is so refined that is better at predicting an individual’s future behavior they could about themselves. Think about this for a moment. Perpetual Worry as a Means of Imprisonment Yet the simplest mechanism for inhibiting higher mind functions, peak performance, and anomalous human capabilities is to just keep people in a constant state of worry, agitation, and fear. Sound familiar? In these states, it is not possible to reach a higher state of awareness. These emotional states do not allow the brain to operate in a manner that will allow this possibility. Fear is the adversary and is at the root of the misuses of these technologies. The government fears an enlightened population where the light of truth shines within its darkest corners. An awakened population cannot be resisted by structures based on fear. The Next Evolution of Humankind After 40 years of research in the open literature and opportunities to meet and spend the time needed with the best bio-physicists in the world has allowed me insight into this area. During my time with the Lay Institute in Dallas, I put together a private conference on mind effects with some of the best people in the world. The surprise was not a story about controlling people and manipulating populations, although everyone agreed this was the case in the 21st century in so many ways. The biggest insight had to do with the next evolution of humankind. Voiced first by the late sister, Dr. Rosalie Bertell, in her presentation about her belief that in what man was trying to create in electronics were already latent in every person waiting to be awakened. The theme was repeated in every presentation that explored the possibilities of reclaiming our birthright in terms of what we are as human beings and the endless possibilities that occur when we begin to recognize ourselves. As we evolve and grow within the framework of this reality we also are beginning to recognize in the science of consciousness and what we know…we are more than we think, and we are beyond what we know. Together we change the world by fearlessly knowing that we each have all that we need to engage the world and are not alone in it. Our humanity is in fact our very salvation if we can recognize and alter our awareness. Dr. Nick Begich is a well-known author, lecturer, multimedia commentator and researcher. Past President of the Alaska Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage Council of Education. Pursuing independent research in the sciences and politics for most of his adult life. Begich received Doctor of Medicine (Medicina Alternitiva), honoris causa, for independent work in health and political science, from The Open International University for Complementary Medicines, Colombo, Sri Lanka, in November 1994. He has authored five books, in ten languages, on science, technology, and politics. His latest work is Controlling the Human Mind - The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak Performance. Begich has published articles in science, politics, and education and is a well-known lecturer, having presented throughout the United States and in twenty countries. He has been featured as a guest on thousands of radio broadcasts reporting on his research activities including new technologies, health, and earth science related technologies. He has also appeared on dozens of television documentaries and other programs throughout the world Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament and worked for various groups representing governments, nonprofits, tribal governments, educators, elected officials, scientists, private corporations and others. He is the publisher and co-owner of Earthpulse Press. Currently, he pursues his own project interests and consults for others in a number of research areas. Dr. Begich has five adult children, and four grandchildren one of whom he is parenting. Neuroscience in Advertising; When Does it Become Mind Control? Seeking Truth, Secrets & Cover Ups, Conspiracy Neuroscience in Advertising; When Does it Become Mind Control? By now you’re probably used to how predictive advertising has become, but it probably felt intrusive at first. Advertisers have always used subtle tactics to convince you to buy things, but now the privacy boundary is increasingly blurred. While it’s somewhat known that advertising finds its roots in propaganda, are developments in technology and neuroscience changing the fundamental nature of marketing into something that borders on mind control or manipulation? The foundational elements of public relations and advertising were developed by a man named Edward L. Bernays, who happened to be the nephew of none other than Sigmund Freud. Freud gave a copy of his General Introductory Lectures, his seminal work on psychoanalysis, to Bernays as a gift in the nascent phase of his career. Bernays was intrigued by Freud’s research, notably the idea that irrational forces drive human behavior. He took the idea and parlayed it into what he referred to as “engineering consent,” a concept that instead of bowing to consumer demands, cultivated them. Body. Mind. Spirit. Every decision we make is inspired by our vision to empower a community of individuals to come together to build a more conscious world. Our unique blend of yoga, meditation, personal transformation, and alternative healing content is designed for those seeking to not just enhance their physical, spiritual, and intellectual capabilities, but to fuse them in the knowledge that the whole is always greater than the sum of its parts. Mass Mind Control Through Network Television: Are Your Thoughts Your Own? Why do countless American people go along with the War on Iraq? Why do so many people call for a police state control grid? A major component to a full understanding of why this kind of governmental and corporate corruption is to discover the modern science of mind control and social engineering. It's baffling to merely glance at the stacks of documentation that this world government isn't being constructed for the greater good of humanity. Although there are a growing number of people waking up the reality of our growing transparent soft cage, there seems to be just enough citizens who are choosing to remain asleep. Worse yet, there are even those who were at least partially awake at one time but found it necessary to return to the slumber of dreamland. This is no accident; this is a carefully crafted design. The drive to dumb down the populations of planet earth is a classic art that existed before the United States did. One component to understanding and deciphering the systems of control is to become a student of the magicians of influence and propaganda. In order to defeat our enemies (or dictators), its imperative that we understand how they think and what they believe in. When people think about mind control, they usually think in terms of the classic "conspiracy theory" that refers to Project MK-Ultra. This program is a proven example of 'overt mind control.' The project had grown out of an earlier secret program, known as Bluebird that was officially formed to counter Soviet advances in brainwashing. In reality the CIA had other objectives. An earlier aim was to study methods 'through which control of an individual may be attained'. The emphasis of experimentation was 'narco-hypnosis', the blending of mind altering drugs with carefully hypnotic programming. A crack CIA team was formed that could travel, at a moments notice, to anywhere in the world. Their task was to test the new interrogation techniques, and ensure that victims would not remember being interrogated and programmed. All manner of narcotics, from marijuana to LSD, heroin and sodium pentathol (the so called 'truth drug') were regularly used. Despite poor initial results, CIA-sponsored mind control program flourished. On 13 April 1953, the super-secret project MK-ULTRA was born. Its scope was broader than ever before, and only those in the top echelon of the CIA were privy to it. Official CIA documents describe MK-ULTRA as an 'umbrella project' with 149 'sub-projects'. Many of these sub-projects dealt with testing illegal drugs for potential field use. Others dealt with electronics. One explored the possibility of activating 'the human organism by remote control'. Throughout, it remained a major goal to brainwash individuals to become couriers and spies without their knowledge. When it was formed in 1947, the CIA was forbidden to have any domestic police or internal security powers. In short, it was authorized only to operate 'overseas'. From the very start MK-ULTRA staff broke this Congressional stipulation and began testing on unwitting American citizens. Precisely how extensive illegal testing became will never be known. Richard Helms, CIA Director and chief architect of the program, ordered the destruction of all MK-ULTRA records shortly before leaving office in 1973. Despite these precautions some documents were misfiled and came to light in the late 1970's. They laid bare the spy agency's cynicism. Despite the widespread knowledge of MK Ultra and the civil lawsuits that followed, this form of behavior modification is not the most expansive. The real dangers are the types of thought control that are 'covert' and not the subject of several dozen Hollywood movies like "Clockwork Orange" and Mel Gibson's "Conspiracy Theory." Our founding fathers faced enormous challenges in the formation of this country and its bill of rights. One challenge was laying down the groundwork or a free society without knowing what kind of technological advances would be made. Who would have guessed in those times that we needed an article in the bill of rights that specifically prohibits the government and it's associates from engaged in mind control or thought control. The closest item that promises our protection from the government is the 4th Article in The Bill of Rights which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Like many are now beginning to note, the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights are merely given lip service by our supposedly elected officials. One of the most common examples of mind control in our so-called free and civilized society is the advent and usage of the television set. This isn't to say that all things on TV are geared towards brainwashing you. They're not. But most of the programming on television today is run by the largest media corporations that have interests in defense contracts, such as Westinghouse (CBS), and General Electric (NBC). This makes perfect sense when you see how slanted and warped the news is today. Examining the conflicts of interest is merely glancing at the issue, although to understand the multiple ways that lies become truth, we need to examine the techniques of brainwashing that the networks are employing. Radio isn't any different in its ability to brainwash a population into submission. Sixty-seven years ago, six million Americans became unwitting subjects in an experiment in psychological warfare. It was the night before Halloween, 1938. At 8 p.m. CST, the Mercury Radio on the Air began broadcasting Orson Welles' radio adaptation of H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds. As is now well known, the story was presented as if it were breaking news, with bulletins so realistic that an estimated one million people believed the world was actually under attack by Martians. Of that number, thousands succumbed to outright panic, not waiting to hear Welles' explanation at the end of the program that it had all been a Halloween prank, but fleeing into the night to escape the alien invaders. "Psychologist Hadley Cantril conducted a study of the effects of the broadcast and published his findings in a book, The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic. This study explored the power of broadcast media, particularly as it relates to the suggestibility of human beings under the influence of fear. Cantril was affiliated with Princeton University's Radio Research Project, which was funded in 1937 by the Rockefeller Foundation. Also affiliated with the Project was Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member and Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) executive Frank Stanton, whose network had broadcast the program. Stanton would later go on to head the news division of CBS, and in time would become president of the network, as well as chairman of the board of the RAND Corporation, the influential think tank which has done groundbreaking research on, among other things, mass brainwashing. Two years later, with Rockefeller Foundation money, Cantril established the Office of Public Opinion Research (OPOR), also at Princeton. Among the studies conducted by the OPOR was an analysis of the effectiveness of "psycho-political operations" (propaganda, in plain English) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Then, during World War II, Cantril and Rockefeller money assisted CFR member and CBS reporter Edward R. Murrow in setting up the Princeton Listening Center, the purpose of which was to study Nazi radio propaganda with the object of applying Nazi techniques to OSS propaganda. Out of this project came a new government agency, the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS). The FBIS eventually became the United States Information Agency (USIA), which is the propaganda arm of the National Security Council. Thus, by the end of the 1940s, the basic research had been done and the propaganda apparatus of the national security state had been set up--just in time for the Dawn of Television." Experiments conducted by researcher Herbert Krugman reveal that when a person watches television, brain activity switches from the left to the right hemisphere. The left hemisphere is the seat of logical thought. Here, information is broken down into its component parts and critically analyzed. The right brain, however, treats incoming data uncritically, processing information in wholes, leading to emotional, rather than logical responses. The shift from left to right brain activity also causes the release of endorphins, the body's own natural opiates--thus, it is possible to become physically addicted to watching television, a hypothesis borne out by numerous studies which have shown that very few people are able to kick the television habit. It's no longer an overstatement to note that the youth today that are raised and taught through network television are intellectually dead by their early teens. The dumbing down of humanity is represented by another shift which occurs in the brain when we watch television. Activity in the higher brain regions (such as the neo-cortex) is diminished, while activity in the lower brain regions (such as the limbic system) increases. The latter, commonly referred to as the reptile brain, is associated with more primitive mental functions, such as the "fight or flight" response. The reptile brain is unable to distinguish between reality and the simulated reality of television. To the reptile brain, if it looks real, it is real. Thus, though we know on a conscious level it is "only a film," on a subconscious level we do not--the heart beats faster, for instance, while we watch a suspenseful scene. Similarly, we know the commercial is trying to manipulate us, but on an unconscious level the commercial nonetheless succeeds in, say, making us feel inadequate until we buy whatever thing is being advertised--and the effect is all the more powerful because it is unconscious, operating on the deepest level of human response. The reptile brain makes it possible for us to survive as biological beings, but it also leaves us vulnerable to the manipulations of television programmers. This is where the manipulators use our own emotions as strings to control us. The distortions and directions we are being moved to are taking place in the subconscious, often undetected. Propaganda techniques were first codified and applied in a scientific manner by journalist Walter Lippman and psychologist Edward Bernays (nephew of Sigmund Freud) early in the 20th century. During World War I, Lippman and Bernays were hired by then United States President, Woodrow Wilson, to participate in the Creel Commission, the mission of which was to sway popular opinion in favor of entering the war, on the side of Britain. Edward Bernays said in his 1928 book Propaganda, "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country." The Creel Commission provided themes for speeches by "four-minute men" at public functions, and also encouraged censorship of the American press. The Commission was so unpopular that after the war, Congress closed it down without providing funding to organize and archive its papers. The war propaganda campaign of Lippman and Bernays produced within six months such an intense anti-German hysteria as to permanently impress American business (and Adolf Hitler, among others) with the potential of large-scale propaganda to control public opinion. Bernays coined the terms "group mind" and "engineering consent", important concepts in practical propaganda work. The current public relations industry is a direct outgrowth of Lippman's and Bernays' work and is still used extensively by the United States government. For the first half of the 20th century Bernays and Lippman ran a very successful public relations firm. World War II saw continued use of propaganda as a weapon of war, both by Hitler's propagandist Joseph Gobbles and the British Political Warfare Executive, as well as the United States Office of War Information. Turn on your local newscast. You have a few minutes of blue-collar crime, hardly any white collar crime, a few minutes of sports, misc. chit chat, random political jibber-jabber, and a look at the weather that no one is forecasting correctly. Is that what happened in your town? And we're supposed to own the airwaves! The mainstream media openly supports the interests of the prison industrial complex. The stories focus on minority criminal groups, and exploit the real threat to appear much more dangerous than they are. Think about the growing per capita number of prisoners in the country. Then remember that this is happening at the same time that our prison boom began. The police on our streets have created criminals. The focus is to keep us in a state of fear, that way the elitists can attack any group they want to without fear of consequence. This is why the media is continuing to craft the timeless art of dehumanization. The techniques are increasing in their sophistication over time as the mind scientists that serve the empire continue to discover scientific breakthroughs as to how the human brain functions, learns, retains information, and behaves. The most effective brainwashing techniques are used on the most successful propaganda networks. Examine the music bed that lies low during the fright night scope of the second. It's spooky. I wonder if we are supposed to be thinking with our minds or getting ready for stunt. Observe the graphics with the music. They're glitzy and flashing. Like the monkey that is attracted to shiny objects, it's our monkey hand that controls to remote often stops the search for entertainment when the proper amount of glamor catches their attention. Most importantly, notice the repetition behind the lies that the politicians and their corporate media groupies tell us. You see, the unimaginable fallacies are created as 'truth' not because it's logical or provable, but because of the broken record technique. No matter how ridiculous the lie, it's repeated often enough that the brain doesn't know the difference between reality and nursery rhymes. This technique is underestimated in its ability to allow the puppeteers to hypnotize millions of people. Instead of "Fair and balanced" it's "We say it enough times, and you believe it." It's a tragic day when the state can monopolize on the enslaving and imprisonment of a population. Hollywood will continue to frighten us with films on the mafia, gangsters, and the corrupt blue collar criminal whose stupidity and greed get them caught. In the end, our minds are already preconditioned to accept living in a police state economy and society because we read it in the paper, saw it praised on the news and talk shows, or saw it in a movie. There are several movies planned right now that support the official story of 911 and a few movies that glamorize the War on IRAQ. According to David L Robb, Author of Operation Hollywood, "Hollywood and the Pentagon have a long history of making movies together. It's a tradition that stretches back to the early days of silent films, and extends right up until the present day. It's been a collaboration that works well for both sides. Hollywood producers get what they want - access to billions of dollars worth of military hardware and equipment - tanks, jet fighters, nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers - and the military gets what it wants - films that portray the military in a positive light; films that help the services in their recruiting efforts. The Pentagon is not merely a passive supporter of films, however. If the Pentagon doesn't like a script, it will usually suggest script changes that will allow the film to receive the military's support and approval. Sometimes these proposed changes are minor. But sometimes the changes are dramatic. Sometimes they change dialogue. Sometimes they change characters. Sometimes they even change history." They create something coined 'disinfotainment'. They mix disinformation with entertainment and call it disinfotainment. Unadulterated violence is now accepted on regular TV. Killing in the name of the mother government is praised, that is unless the violence is committed in self defense to protect someone from the system. Sharp shooters, bombers, and assassin are worshiped if they are fighting for the system, are in the military, or are associated with groups that control the masses locally, such as the local police department. I don't condone violence, however it's hypocritical to support one form of homicide when it favors the elite, and condemn another when it's done to protect your land, freedom, or loved ones. This odd reality transfers itself into the shady world of video games that are stepped in plots and tasks to kill as much as the player can. The players are getting younger and younger with 7 out of 10 children playing games with a 'Mature' rating. Recently I was browsing the PC video game selection at a very large electronics store. I was appalled to see nearly 50 different games in which the setting of the game is Iraq and the goal is to kill as many insurgents as possible and fulfill the mission. Children today are being indoctrinated through their favorite games and law enforcement programs to be the button pushers of the weapons of mass destruction for tomorrow's world. Is it any wonder why there are two house bills and a senate bill (with more on the way), which are giant steps in dismantling the free speech of the general public. These bills together would kill (PEG) cable access centers where the public still owns the airwaves. It's the programming created locally, without censorship or commercial gain. Their income is derived from franchises within the local cities and a small percentage cable subscriber frees. This is a corporate takeover because this is centralizing communication by removing the locally based programming and moving the audience to the more official, nationalistic, and sensational programs that promotes violence, uniformity, and slavery over peach, diversity and freedom. Cable access features free speech and information with perspectives neglected by mainstream television. It also features a free flow programming system with fresh programs being aired by new producers on a rotating basis. This keeps the content and information creative and locally based while network TV is rigid with regular time slots and repetitive programming. The blocks of programming that are universally accepted parallel the shift to craft our entire lives towards the factory's bell and the illusion of time. This is the creation of the hive mind. The hive mind is result of massive brainwashing to the general public. Everyone shares the same thoughts, goals, knowledge and understanding. A hive mind society gears itself towards conformity and ignores diversity while masqueraded as the road to utopia in mainstream television. Network programming, weather it's the news or drama, is geared towards artificially creating your world and reality. With the proper amount of entertainment and sensationalism, we may even be living our lives through the television set. Many anchors and actors are beautiful and research shows that attractive people are usually perceived as trust worthy. While the real news rolls quickly by on the bottom of your screen, the anchor is selling you on the idea of having your very own police state hell hole right here in your local jurisdiction, or how 2 sports opposing teams chased around on a court for 2 hours in attempt to score points means something to you. No education, no information, SPIN. Today the media represents a tool of brainwashing and indoctrination that is utilized on behalf of the owners interests. Since the 1996 Telco act, television and radio stations all across the nation were bought out by major international media outlets. Clear Channel and Infinity are the two largest corporations in radio today. This has centralized the distribution of information and has threatened our free society ever since. The media drums to the heartbeat of its owners, whose interests are not of the general public. Instead they are interested in their other financial endeavors like defense contracting, oil business, political parties, prison industry. The conflicts of interest are monumental with the deregulation of the corporations. The lines are now blurred between one network's coverage of the war and the other. Once we come to the conclusion that the media is intentionally deceiving us, we can apply the principles of problem-reaction-solution. This formula takes a problem by either creating it or allowing it to happen and presenting that to the population. It could be terrorism, molestation, extra terrestrials. These topics create fear and no one in their right mind would support terrorism or crime. It's therefore OK to blast the television, the papers, and radio with 'the problem.' The natural reaction from the people is a request for more control to ensure more safety. Most let their fear and emotional side control their decisions and usually translated into something like, "The government needs more power over our lives to make us safer and freer from tyranny. I believe what the media tells me so I will support whatever decisions they make." Today's mainstream corporate news program discourages dissent of the war and paints activists with a negative brush that hints of treason. At the same time, the so-called journalists are cogs in a much larger machine who know that if they report a story that paints the government in a dark light, is likely to remain on 'the wire' and off the front page. The most disturbing thing about spending a single hour examining network cable news and modern Hollywood films are the reoccurring themes in the backdrop. The central ideas of countless "investigative reports" or "Friday night special" features are about a threat of some type over the horizon. The end of the world as we know it is being sold. If the news isn't feeding it to you, then the History Channel or Discover Channel are either talking about the crusades, asteroids, UFOs, earthquakes, terrorism, or exposes about serial killers. They are crafted a message that our world is unstable, and the threat is always an invisible and dangerous one that only our military can fix. When you record and log all the messages, you end up with a script, a screen write produced through the movie studios of Hollywood hell. I am not alone in noting this observation. Local and network news are designing their editorials about despair and fear because the owners, producers, and editors now understand that fear sells. The end result are the desired ratings, delivered like expected. The masters of modern spin understand that we like to be terrified. Just look at the success in the action/suspense/terror genres that have plopped onto the conveyor belt and packaged for our glee consumption. When the editors in charge found out that simply plastering a terror alert chart didn't scare the people the same way it used to, they began to kick up the campaign of terror a few notches with new and creative ways to sell the police state. When you get to the other side of the terror alerts of all shapes and sizes, you find another nightmare masquerading as the savior. The 'Ministry of Truth' will protect you. The mother government is here to rescue you and squash this brown terrorist bug, this gray alien, this avian bird flu, and every other nightmare that the nightly news brought you. The finest public relations specialists take the science of worshiping our kings down to a frame by frame level. George W. Bush is pictured in numerous poises with a hallo around his head. In other pictures, he stands tall with dozens of American flags blowing in the wind behind him. A more blasphemous display features him speaking in front of the cross of Jesus Christ. The message send couldn't be more clearly presented. Our current leaders are of the messiah status and only through them, will we reach the gates of safety. The lie that has been accepted by so many as truth is that this is a religious war. Numerous prime time programs are telling the story of the crusades (without the horrors) to synch our vibrations up to something out of the 13th Century, instead of the 21st Century. If the America people accept the fact that the crusades are here, that George Bush reports directly to god, and that revelations are here, then they have won the war for our minds. The loudspeaker whispers, "All our problems are by accident, never design." Across the room the system's minion snorts, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." It's that plot that says Middle Eastern terrorists from an Afghan cave are the reason beyond our little, "War on terror." Related messages in the script demonize young minority males and suggest harsh punishments for crimes they commit. They don't come out overtly and state their racist agenda. They come at you from the side by airing the same crime news repetitively, usually when it's committed by the minority group. The networks love the fact that the TV sets the norms in society and today, and hence politically opinion. Who would imagine that in the United States of America, both candidates of both parties in the 2004 election would be members of the Skull and Bones society at Yale University? Out of 290 million Americans, this is the best we could come up with? It is the decision of the owners to influence producers, editors, and others involved to paint to brush to fit the objective, which is the bottom line. If Sports is what the people want, then they get it, usually in large doses. Multi-media sports (or spectator sports) is just an escape from our own existence. It's like gambling, or drug addiction. It provides that buffer zone of rooting for something with other people that we've been told is good. People's fantasies also lead them to fixating on sports. It's simulated masculinity, in an age where there's a push to change us from men to robots. It's human nature to resist and fight that which is suppressing us. The sociologists and psychologists in areas of influence know this. Spectator sports prove the outlet internationally for what has been stripped away from us. We've lost the right to rebel and change our government through warfare if necessary. Today the bulk of our nation's population today doesn't know what's really going on with the fall of the American dollar and the plans for the transfer of American wealth to other countries. However, most can tell you who the top basketball or football players are. A lot of fans wish they were the stars, out there on the stage, the court, and the drag strip. Either you're "numero uno" in center stage or you're nothing. End of story. What I never understood when I was in high school was why my peers and friends would act naïve or ignorant in a "Wayne's World" or "Beavis and Butthead" kind of way. What I've learned since then is that the numerous programs that are pimping themselves of as 'entertainment' are actually targeted to the lowest common denominator. This is especially true with disc jockeys in radio today. The reason our airwaves are saturated with jokes and content centered on fart jokes, private parts, borderline racism, and general trash talk is because it is selling. In the meantime, large numbers of our children, young adults, and older audiences are mimicking what they see and hear because the current 'norm' is selling this behavior as cool or 'chic.' When the conditioned is so intense that these forms of content are considered the norm, anything else seems either bizarre or uninteresting to the average American's attention span that is decreasing by the day. Hypothetically, if a producer on a network did get away with a feature story exposing government corruption at the highest levels, chances are the large impact necessary wouldn't be realized because the average viewer's brain has already been conditioned to seek out certain types of disinfotainment. The media has created the picture perfect society that could exist if we only did things their way, (their interests/government interest). It tells us what happiness is and what it is not and same for love, hate or anything else they can implant into our subconsciousness. We can become the perfect slave to the system through indoctrination given through network TV. Over time the messages are becoming increasingly racist, violent, and dishonest. But the programming began decades ago and few have the eyes to see it for what it has become. We live in a world where the populations give their minds away to the official version of the event, where utopia is right around the corner when big brother is riding shotgun. It's a world where Hollywood can make you believe anything, even that you are free. It's a world in which the prosecutor and the judge sit on the same side of the bench. The most obvious reason that our minds are being controlled on a massive scale psychologically, is because our culture has been conditioned incrementally through TV, radio, or the paper. We are given the world reality through a screen, some ink, or radio waves. The truth is hiding in plain site. The indoctrination through these mediums warns us that views other than those presented by them are unimportant and too be condemned. This administration and media monopoly has a carefully crafted dehumanization program to anyone that dissents the official version of events. Some people are wrong about 5% of the time. Some are wrong most of the time. I wish I was wrong all the time. A lot of people deal with these intense realities, by asking me rhetorically, "What is the solution, smart guy?" Remember, it's the viewers, the consumers and all the other little votes called dollars that helped this oligarchy system lay its concrete foundation in our backyards. We must recognize the truth about why the system is flawed and enslaving us if we wish to beat it. The most important solution to fighting this type of brainwashing and mind control is to start with ourselves and our own awakening in the smaller things. In this case, it's brainwashing but after awhile we break Outside the Box and begin venturing outside the system and into unknown terrain. Fighting with people and forcing them to understand 'our truth' is not a solution. If our collective free will created this nightmare, than only our collective free will change it. The battle begins in the heart and mind of the beholder, and then extends outward from there, only to those open to the information. If you choose to travel the road to the truth, then you must be prepared for the obstacles that await you. You may be condemned or criticized by your family, your friends, your lovers, or your co-workers. This is their programming that began at birth that is doing exactly what it's supposed to do. You're going to have to be stronger than that. You must realize that there is a reality that exists outside of this controlled artificial system. Like Indiana Jones in the Last Crusade, he took that 'leap of faith' over the bridgeless canyon in an attempt to get to the other side. Like Neo in the Matrix, he took the red pill from Morpheus in his attempt to cross over to his real self. Once you wake up, it's as if a hypnotist came along and snapped his fingers. You wake up and say to yourself, "Oh my god. I can see it now. Why did it take me so long to wake up?!" For some of you it can be a major shock. Like anything else, take this information and knowledge in stages. If it took a lifetime for them to mold your reality for you, then you know that it may take longer than a day to fully awaken. Remember, the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. Operation Mockingbird was a covert U.S. government operation run by the CIA to implant pro-US propaganda in American media and front organizations. Starting in the 1950s, the CIA began to hire and contract students and people in the media to write false stories, or embellish stories to favor the U.S government. In 1967, it was proven in Ramparts magazine that even the National Student Organization was being funneled money by the CIA for festivals and other events. Using phoney companies and mysterious benefactors, these collectives created massive amounts of propaganda, using the average American student. It was blown open in 1977 when famed journalist Carl Bernstein, who also, with his partner Bob Woodward, exposed the Watergate scandal in 1974. In his 1977 piece, The CIA and the Media, Bernstein revealed that certain reporters not only were paid by the U.S government, they also engaged in more extensive relationships with the CIA, even sharing notebooks, and some were paid upwards of $500,000 for their work. Some have alleged that these operations and front organizations still exist, despite little evidence. Still, it’s always beneficial to make sure your information is real. The National Student Organization was exposed in the Ramparts magazine in 1967 for having money funneled to them by the CIA for festivals and other events. Massive amounts of propaganda was made using the average American student. This was blown open in 1977 when journalists Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward exposed the Watergate scandal in 1974. https://fightingmonarch.com/2020/02/05/television-is-mind-control/ https://research.library.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=international_senior TV is Mind Control through Physiological and Psychological Manipulation Television is an anesthetic for the pain of the modern world” – Astrid Alauda - It’s estimated the average American, starting at the young ripe age of two years old, watches more than 34 hours of television per week, plus an additional 3 hours of recorded media. Corporate media is mostly funded by corporations. 75% of the commercial airtime is paid for by the 100 largest corporations in the USA, with budgets into the billions for some. When new content is created, it can attract or detract advertising and investment into the commercial side. If some content is not liked by a corporation that funds a majority of the television network, then chances are they are going to hand them a script of what to say to keep public opinion in their favor. Television is a private medium for new information to get out, where the corporations decide what commercials we see in between shows, and also get to influence what shows get to startup or continue on a network. The more we watch TV, the more we go into alpha brainwave states, the slow and receptive pattern that accepts images and suggestion into consciousness less critically. A state of hypnosis is induced by the alpha frequency, where you are content to just sit and continue watching. Going from the beta to an alpha wave state can affect how we feel, making it pleasurable to induce an alpha wave relaxed state and watching the TV, thereby making it addictive as a habit to “veg” out. Kicking the habit seems to be hard for many people to do. For some reason, they are drawn to spend time and pay attention to the TV. Television is a drug “Krugman monitored a person through many trials and found that in less than one minute of television viewing, the person’s brainwaves switched from Beta waves — brainwaves associated with active, logical thought — to primarily Alpha waves. When the subject stopped watching television and began reading a magazine, the brainwaves reverted to Beta waves.” We are in a lower mental state, less evaluative, less critical, less able to discern truth from falsity, reality from unreality. There are many ideas base don images we receive, that we would normally reject, or at least question, under normal conditions. Whereas with television this functionality is impaired. We are filled with both images of half truth and propaganda, but also images that distract and divert our attention from social realities of the world with banal, pointless, irrelevant, mind-numbing fodder and entertainment to keep us stimulated. One thing to note however, is that CRT (cathode ray tube) television technology operated differently than current LCD technology. The efffect of light frequency transmission for alpha wave state increase may be different. Here is a summary of some of Krugman’s conclusions: “Internal Alpha responses can be stimulated by appropriate external rhythms or frequencies.” “The time may come when the mass media may create special programs to help people modify certain attitudes or behavior.” “This means that passively learned material has an important ‘advantage’ which some have also associated with so called subliminal perception, extrasensory perception, or hypnotism.” “For early education there may be an opportunity to accept the fact that many children fidget in class, and that this interference with their attention is not to be blamed on parents, teachers, or the child. Mild drugging of these children, or training in relaxation through Alpha driving, may be dramatically helpful to their educational achievement.” “For public television there may be an opportunity to accept without shame the fact that it has taught violence to an entire generation. The clear store of television violence is not that a new generation is more violent but that the new generation knows more violence. The political consequences of this may yet be what some would call ‘good’ (e.g., pacifist).” “It is possible that the relaxed and successful character of passive learning can be enhanced by the artificial induction of Alpha rhythm, this with the aid of a flickering light.” The Truth About TV Switching our attention constantly, seems addictive as well. We are drawn to short attention activity, checking our messages, notifications, looking for attention from somewhere. Time and attention is also fractured in watching frame-breaking split second scenes and rapid temporal shifts in plots. Reality doesn’t operate this way, but technology has allowed imagery to be manipulated. Images are broken up, shifting from one to the other, requiring our attention to keep up with all the constant changes, leading us to develop attention deficits (ADD, ADHD) and a need for attention grabbing visual stimulus. Reality doesn’t match up, becomes too slow and boring. “Augmented” and virtual realities (games) are more desirable as they provide a constant flux of stimulation and keep our attention occupied in small fragments of time. Games and TV both serve as an escape from the mundane slow boring reality we are conditioned to experience that way. They are our opiates, our soma from Brave New World to keep us entertained like a circus or gladiator matches, or it’s our anesthetic to keep us drooling as we watch hours and hours of garbage. The imagery we get is a mix of real, unreal and semi-real events. We are left to judge and evaluate what reality is like based on a flood of images. The events can merge, with similar variables that make them all appear real and valid. How Television Works As real-life experience is increasingly replaced by the mediated ‘experience’ of television-viewing, it becomes easy for politicians and market-researchers of all sorts to rely on a base of mediated mass experience that can be evoked by appropriate triggers. The TV ‘world’ becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: the mass mind takes shape, its participants acting according to media-derived impulses and believing them to be their own personal volition arising out of their own desires and needs. In such a situation, whoever controls the screen controls the future, the past, and the present. “I know the secret of making the average American believing anything I want them to. Just let me control television. You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV sets images.” That is the science of imagery and the power of symbols invoked within our consciousness to influence our lives. Reality is being created for us through the beliefs we have in what other people tell us and what we see. Ever argue with the someone, present new information, yet they reject it by falling back on their blind trust on the “news”? The news said it, therefore it’s “true”. Not only can people lie to use to deceive us, but now technology is used to manipulate our trust in what they show us. The news media of puppets and liars have previously been exposed with their green screen fake news, and this is in 2024! The group of people who want to tout themselves as representatives of truth and “real news”, are in bed with the CIA, still mostly likely to this day. It’s offocial in the 50, 60, and 70s through a long running Operation Mockingbird to pay heads of major media companies to influence the minds of the public as propagandists and gatekeepers for the establishment. They manipulate data, twist and spin things to create narratives for people to accept about what is happening in reality. Here is Anderson Cooper with ties to the CIA. The intelligentsia work to promote a certain narrative, story or worldview for the masses to adopt as the way reality is. Here is a longer fake-news video from 2023. News reporters used to have pieces of paper to repeat the news, whether it was real or not. Earlier, they used to care about reporting the facts, and were the fact accountability arm of society to balance the tendency for lies, corruption and manipulation that comes from government. The media was supposed to keep the government in check. But it doesn’t anymore. Now the media is another arm of the establishment and pushes the same agenda. They create a false opposition and false dichotomous relationships (CNN, Fox, NBC, etc.) to give an illusion of opposition and honesty, but it’s smoke and mirrors. Now the anchors on the news, don’t research and check the news. They just repeat the stream of information that is fed to them. The read what the teleprompter says. Most of it is useless, and doesn’t matter in your daily life. It serves as another distraction to keep our attention on, and prevents us from figuring out what is really going on. If it really that shocking to understand how we are manipulated into wars? Syria. Libya. Iraq. Afghanistan. And that’s just in the past decade or so. There was the 9/11 false flag disinfo to create a new Pearl Harbor and lead Americans into a new prosperous foreign policy abroad. WWII and WWI had false flag attacks to leads the US into war. Things aren’t as they appear, as James Corbett lays out here. Now, if you want to dig deeper, you can, like for instance, how the news lies and creates fake news about Isis and Syria. Isis is directly tied to the US and John McCain, and funded by the US for weapons and trucks at the very least. There is tons of evidence on the net to find. You can get more into the fake news, with research into crisis actors related to the Boston bombings, Paris, Sandy Hook, Aurora, and many other shootings where things smell foul and don’t add up. Go check it out. The media is lying to you, and when you look close you can uncover how deceptive the whole show is. Oh, and by the way, New Haven, Connecticut (Sandy Hook town), is the HQ for the Church of Satan. Just to tie this into the pizzagate and satanism angle. Our reality is being acted out, by actors, who fake emotion and events to create a false reality for us to imagine is real. We are watching movies, but aren’t told it’s a movie, so we think it’s “real” through our blind trust, loyalty and faith in the establishment. Look at the movie Galaxy Quest, and how they think television shows are historical documents: If we trust the source, then that source becomes reality for us. This is how easy it is to manipulate our consciousness, and the media can do it well. Imagery is powerful. Studying and understanding consciousness empowers on in life. I recently wrote two posts about the importance of understanding consciousness [1- Know Thyself, 2- Choice and Decision-Making Require Emotion, but Shouldn’t be Focused on Emotion] The news casters, anchors and reporters, speak to us is soft tones, to make sure their message is received in a non threatening way. They manipulate our basic emotional aversion to being confronted or attacked, by not speaking harshly or using specific keywords that would “trigger” us. They can’t cover everyone’s triggers, but they tend to keep their message neutral and acceptable by the majority of people. Mind Control Theories And Techniques Used By The Mass Media Programming Through Mass Media Mass media are media forms designed to reach the largest audience possible. They include television, movies, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, records, video games and the internet. Many studies have been conducted in the past century to measure the effects of mass media on the population, in order to discover the best techniques to influence it. From those studies emerged the science of Communications, which is used in marketing, public relations and politics. Mass communication is a necessary tool to ensure the functionality of a large democracy; it is also a necessary tool for a dictatorship. There used to be a variety of viewpoints, ideas and opinions in popular culture. The consolidation of media corporations has, however, produced a standardization of the cultural industry. Ever wondered why all recent music sounds the same and all recent movies look the same? The following is part of the answer: Media Ownership The number of corporations owning the majority of U.S. media outlets went from 50 to 6 in less than 20 years. Here are the top corporations evolving around the world and the assets they own. oligarchy of media conglomerates. The TV shows you follow, the music you listen to, the movies you watch and the newspapers you read are basically all produced by SIX corporations. The owners of those conglomerates have close ties with the so-called "world’s elite" and, in many ways, they are "the elite". By owning all of the possible outlets having the potential to reach the masses, these conglomerates have the power to create in the minds of the people a single and cohesive world view, engendering a “standardization of human thought”. Even movements or styles that are considered marginal are, in fact, extensions of mainstream thinking. Mass media produce their own rebels who definitely look the part but are still part of the establishment and do not question any of it. Artists, creations and ideas that do not fit the mainstream way of thinking are mercilessly rejected and forgotten by the conglomerates, which in turn makes them virtually disappear from society itself. However, ideas that are deemed to be valid and desirable to be accepted by society are skillfully marketed to the masses, in order to make them become the self-evident norm. In 1928, Edward Bernays already saw the immense potential of motion pictures to standardize thought: “The American motion picture is the greatest unconscious carrier of propaganda in the world today. It is a great distributor for ideas and opinions. The motion picture can standardize the ideas and habits of a nation. Because pictures are made to meet market demands, they reflect, emphasize, and even exaggerate broad popular tendencies, rather than stimulate new ideas and opinions. The motion picture avails itself only of ideas and facts which are in vogue. As the newspaper seeks to purvey news, it seeks to purvey entertainment.” – Edward Bernays, Propaganda These facts were flagged as dangers to human freedom in the 1930s by thinkers of the school of Frankfurt such as Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse. They identified three main problems with the cultural industry. The industry can: reduce human beings to the state of mass by hindering the development of emancipated individuals, who are capable of making rational decisions; replace the legitimate drive for autonomy and self-awareness by the safe laziness of conformism and passivity; and validate the idea that men actually seek to escape the absurd and cruel world in which they live, by losing themselves in a hypnotic state of self-satisfaction. The notion of escapism is even more relevant today with the advent of online video games, 3D movies and home theaters. The masses, constantly seeking state-of-the-art entertainment, will resort to high-budget products that can only be produced by the biggest media corporations of the world. These products contain carefully calculated messages and symbols which are nothing more and nothing less than entertaining propaganda. The public has been trained to LOVE its propaganda to the extent that it spends its hard-earned money to be exposed to it. Propaganda (used in a political, cultural, and commercial sense) is no longer the coercive or authoritative communication form found in dictatorships: it has become the synonym of entertainment and pleasure. A single piece of media often does not have a lasting effect on the human psyche. Mass media, however, by its omnipresent nature, creates a living environment we evolve in on a daily basis. It defines the norm and excludes the undesirable. The same way carriage horses wear blinders so they can only see what is right in front of them, the masses can only see where they are supposed to go. Manipulation Techniques The drive to sell products and ideas to the masses has lead to an unprecedented amount of research on human behavior and on the human psyche. Cognitive sciences, psychology, sociology, semiotics, linguistics, and other related fields were and still are extensively researched through well-funded studies.

The Real Illuminati One World Headquarter 13 questions about the clandestine secret society answered Who were the Illuminati, and do they really control the world? Here's what we know about one of history's most alluring secret societies, including how you became a member... What is the Illuminati? The Illuminati is a name given to both a real and fictitious society. The latter has fueled conspiracy theories for years, with people claiming it to be a secretive and mysterious worldwide organization intent on world domination – as well as being behind some of history’s greatest revolutions and assassinations. What was the original Illuminati? The Illuminati was a secret society formed in Bavaria (now part of modern-day Germany) that existed from 1776 to 1785 – its members originally referred to themselves as Perfectibility. The group was inspired by the ideals of the Enlightenment and founded by professor of canon law Adam Weishaupt. He wanted to promote the education of reason and philanthropy and oppose superstition and religious influence in society. Weishaupt sought to change the way states in Europe were run, removing the influence of religion from government and giving people a new source of ‘illumination’. Where was the Illuminati's first meeting? It’s believed that the Bavarian Illuminati’s first meeting was held in a forest near Ingolstadt on 1 May 1776. Here, five men set out the rules that would govern the secret order. Eventually the group’s aims focused on influencing political decisions and disrupting institutions like the monarchy and the Church. A bird known as the ‘owl of Minerva’ (Minerva being the ancient Roman goddess of wisdom) eventually became its main symbol. How is the Illuminati connected to the Freemasons? Some members of the Illuminati joined the Freemasons in order to recruit new members. The Freemasons are a fraternal order that evolved from the guilds of stonemasons and cathedral builders of the Middle Ages. In some countries, especially the US, there has historically been a lot of paranoia about the Freemasons – in 1828, a single-issue political movement known as the Anti-Masonic Party was even established. Due to the original Illuminati recruitment of Freemasons, the two groups have often been confused for each other. How could you join the Illuminati? To join the Illuminati, you had to have full consent from the other members, possess wealth, and have a good reputation within a suitable family. There was also a hierarchical system to Illuminati membership. After entering as a ‘novice’, you graduated to a ‘minerval’ and then an ‘illuminated minerval’, although this structure later became more complicated, with 13 degrees of initiation required in order to become a member. Did the Illuminati use rituals? The Illuminati did use rituals – most of which remain unknown – and pseudonyms were used to keep the identities of members a secret. However, the rituals we do know about (found in seized, secret papers) explain how novices could move to a higher level within the Illuminati’s hierarchy: they had to compile a report on all the books they owned, write a list of their weaknesses, and reveal the names of any enemies they had. The novice would then promise to sacrifice personal interests for the good of the society. Is the all-seeing eye linked to the Illumnati? The ‘Eye of Providence’ – a symbol resembling an eye inside a triangle – appears on churches around the globe, as well as on Masonic buildings and the US one-dollar bill. In addition to being associated with Freemasonry, it has also been linked with the Illuminati as a symbol of the group’s control and surveillance of the world. Originally a Christian emblem, the all-seeing eye has been used in paintings to represent God’s watchfulness over humanity. In the 18th century, it began to be used in new ways – for example, in Jean-Jacques-François Le Barbier’s The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, an illustrated version of the human rights document adopted by France’s National Constituent Assembly in 1789. Here, it is depicted as an instrument of paternalistic reason, keeping a watchful eye over the newly democratic nation. There is no official link between the all-seeing eye and the Illuminati – the proposed connection probably stems from the fact that the original group shared similarities with the Freemasons, who used the image as a symbol of God. Did the Illuminati succeed in world domination? Some people believe that the Illuminati controls the world today, suggesting that they are so secretive that few are aware of it. As many members of the Illuminati infiltrated the Freemasons and vice versa, it’s difficult to judge the Illuminati’s success, but most historians believe the original group only gained moderate influence. Were there any famous members Illuminati? By 1782, the Illuminati had grown to around 600 members – these included German nobles such as Baron Adolph von Knigge who, as a former Freemason, helped shape the group’s organisation and expansion. Initially, Weishaupt’s students were the only members, but soon, doctors, lawyers and intellectuals joined. There were between 2,000 and 3,000 Illuminati members by 1784. Some sources say that renowned writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe also joined, but this is disputed. Why did the Illuminati disappear? In 1784, Karl Theodor, Duke of Bavaria, banned the creation of any kind of society not previously authorized by law and the following year he passed a second edict, which expressly banned the Illuminati. During the arrest of suspected Illuminati members, compromising documents (defending ideas such as atheism and suicide) were found in their possession, as well as instructions for carrying out abortions. This cemented the belief that the group was a threat to both the state and the Church. The Illuminati then seems to have disappeared, with some people believing that it continued underground. What happened to Adam Weishaupt? Adam Weishaupt was eventually stripped of his post at the University of Ingolstadt. After being exiled from Bavaria, he spent the remainder of his life in Gotha, Thuringia, dying in 1830. Why did the myth of the Illuminati endure? From the moment they disbanded, conspiracy theories about the Illuminati began to take hold. In 1797, French publicist and Jesuit priest Abbé Augustin Barruel suggested that secret societies like the Illuminati had spearheaded the French Revolution. First president of the US, George Washington, then wrote a letter the following year in which he stated that he believed the threat of the Illuminati had been avoided, adding further fuel to the idea that the order still existed. Books and sermons condemning the group later sprung up, and third US president, Thomas Jefferson, was falsely accused of being a member. Why do people still believe in the Illuminati today? The idea of a world-dominating Illuminati has never really left people’s minds, and still infiltrates popular culture today. In 1963, a text called the Principia Discordia was published, promoting an alternative belief system known as ‘Discordianism’. Calling for anarchism and civil disobedience by perpetrating hoaxes, its adherents included writer Robert Anton Wilson. Some followers of Discordianism sent fake letters into magazines claiming that events such as the assassination of US president John F Kennedy were all the work of the Illuminati. Wilson later published a book with Robert Shea, The Illuminatus! Trilogy, which became a cult success and inspired a new genre of conspiracy fiction, including Dan Brown’s novel (and subsequent film) Angels & Demons. The Illuminati also became connected with Satanism and other ideals that were far removed from those associated with the original 18th-century Bavarian group. Is the New World Order connected to the Illuminati? Those who believe in the theory of a New World Order believe that an elite group of people are trying to rule the globe. As well as US presidents, several popstars have been accused of being members, including Beyoncé and Jay-Z. Both have denied the claims. Your guide to the Freemasons What do we know about this fraternal organization, and what does it have to do with the master craftsmen of the Middle Ages? When and where did Freemasonry originate? There is still a great deal of speculation about how the fraternal organisation of Freemasonry originated. The earliest known texts relating to masonry date to 1390–1425, and state that the craft of masonry began with the Greek mathematician Euclid, in c300 BC Egypt, arriving in England during the reign of King Athelstan in the 10th century. The earliest English documents on Freemasonry also date to the 14th century and appear to refer to a worker in freestone – a type of sandstone or limestone that was used to create ornamental masonry. Some historians have interpreted the word ‘free’ to mean that the mason was not enslaved or bound to a master, but the truth of this is unclear. What was a mason? Highly skilled, a Master Mason combined the skills of architect, builder, craftsman, designer and engineer, using a set of compasses, a marked rope or staff, and a set square to create the magnificent cathedrals and castles of the Middle Ages. The size and scale of the projects undertaken and the scarcity of the tools used led many to believe that Masons possessed some sort of magical secret. What were Masonic lodges? Workshops based at the site of major building work were originally referred to as ‘lodges’, a word later used to refer to a community of masons in one place. From the 1660s, we see gentleman joining nonoperative lodges and becoming ‘masons’ – it was this ‘speculative freemasonry’ that evolved into the organization we see today. In 1717, the first Freemason Grand Lodge was formed, when four London lodges met at a tavern in St Paul’s churchyard and declared themselves to be a Grand Lodge – the world’s first. The movement was designed to allow men to socialize together, avoiding the topics of religion and politics. The Grand Lodge of Ireland was subsequently formed in 1725, followed by the Grand Lodge of Scotland in 1736. Mirroring the expansion of the British Empire, Freemasonry, too, expanded greatly overseas, and by 1900, some 2,800 Grand Lodges had been formed across the globe, including North America and Europe. Well-known individuals such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Edward Jenner, Walter Scott and William IV were all members of the organization. What was the status of women in Freemasonry? Masonic lodges were, and still are, restricted to men, as were the stonemason guilds of the Middle Ages, but during the 1740s, Lodges of Adoption began to appear in France, attached to the traditional men-only lodges and operating under their direction. The first mixed Grand Lodge, Le Droit Humain, was formed in France in 1893, open to women and men who were “just, upright and free, of mature age, sound judgment and strict morals”. Co-Masonry was brought to England in 1902 by social reformer and campaigner for women’s rights, Annie Besant, who was herself initiated in France. A women-only order was formed six years later, and by 1935, it was an exclusively female organization. Have any women ever joined a men-only lodge? There are some alleged cases. In the 18th century, Elizabeth Aldworth is said to have secretly watched the proceedings of a lodge meeting. On discovering the breach of their secrecy, they were obliged to admit her and she was seen in public wearing her Masonic regalia. What about the Masonic conspiracy theories – and are they real? Conspiracy theories have followed the Freemasons since the 18th century. Among them are claims that the Freemasons are connected to the Illuminati; that they worship the Devil; and even that they faked the Apollo Moon landings. Symbols, images and ritual remain an important part of the Freemason movement, the learning and performing of which takes place behind closed doors in member-only ceremonies. Even before construction began in September 1989, there were a number of Denver International Airport (DIA) conspiracy theories. Arguably the tamest of these (or those that would follow) was that there was no need for the airport in the first place and that its construction was a subterfuge designed to hide or disguise the construction of other, far more nefarious structures. In fact, despite claims that Stapleton International Airport was perfectly serviceable, the concourse crowding and tightly packed runways often created schedule disruptions on a national (and even international) level whenever there was inclement weather in the region. The wild conspiracies didn’t end there, however. In fact, the initial claims barely scratched the surface, and couldn’t foretell the theories that would arise once the facility’s construction was completed. It’s hardly possible to construct a precise timeline of which notion first burst onto the scene, or the subsequent claims that pop up on an almost daily basis. So, while I’ve tried to make this as comprehensive as possible given the time and space allotted, know that this is still an incomplete record. Nazi Runway Models One of the more prevalent theories is that the runways at DIA are arranged to form a swastika as a tribute to the fascist New World Order. As can be seen below, this one isn’t quite as far-fetched as it may seem upon hearing the claim. The layout does bear a resemblance to the notorious symbol, particularly if you choose to selectively ignore some parts of the scheme. Far from the nefarious claims, however, the reasoning behind this configuration is pretty straightforward. Simply put, having the various runways splayed out in this pinwheel design makes it easier for multiple runways to be used at once, and minimizes the chance of having to shut down all runways during inclement weather or strong winds. Of course, as you can see below, the shape isn’t as well-defined in actuality as it seems at first blush. While the brain seeks patterns, and the layout of the airport creates a sense of recognition, once you actually try to trace the lines out, it becomes apparent that the alleged swastika isn’t quite as clearly present as one may have initially thought. Note that the elements which have been traced were picked in order to best define the expected pattern, not because of their significance or prominence. Also, the form was traced without adding lines that aren’t there, or arbitrarily ending lines to create artificial symmetry. Even then, there are a great many elements of the design which have to be ignored completely in order to keep the pattern from being disrupted. Not That Close Encounters One of the stranger (and most easily dismissed) claims began with an anonymous individual watching (or re-watching) the 1977 Steven Spielberg classic Close Encounters of the Third Kind. In the film, a mysterious broadcast purportedly reveals the coordinates for Devil’s Tower, a Wyoming landmark that is pivotal to the story. However, for some unknown reason, the coordinates don’t actually correspond to the location of said landmark. Years later, the mystery of the strange coordinates was revealed; they actually indicated the future location of (you guessed it!) Denver International Airport…a dozen years before construction on the airfield began! Pretty mind-blowing, isn’t it? At least until you scrutinize the claim, at which point you’ll discover that the numbers provided actually point to the longitude and latitude of Ault, Colorado, a small town in Weld County. While Ault (an acronym for “A Unique Little Town”) is indeed closer to DIA than the Devil’s Tower, it still logs in at over 65 miles away from the airport, far enough away that if a DC-10 were to land there, it would likely make national news. Welcome to the New World Few things immediately raise the hackles of conspiracy theorists as quickly as the phrase “New World Order,” and few organizations are as frequently targeted by conspiracy theories as the Freemasons. Given that the dedication capstone at the airport not only prominently features a Masonic crest, but also lists members of the “New World Airport Commission,” it should come as no surprise that the mere existence of this monument became a bit of an “Aha!” element in many of the more conspiratorial corners of the internet. One of the more prominent claims about the New World Airport Commission is that there is no such organization, and never has been, that this was a not-so ‘secret’ code for the (again, you guessed it!) nefarious and nebulous New World Order. The problem with this theory is that the organization not only is a real thing but we here at Western History & Genealogy house 11 boxes of the Commission's archival documents (WH858). The very real (but also quite temporary) commission was formed by Charles Ansbacher, chair of the state’s Council on the Arts and Humanities. The purpose of the organization was primarily to promote and arrange the festivities for the airport’s opening, and as such disbanded shortly after the airport was opened for business. For the record, Mr. Ansbacher, a conductor for the Colorado Springs Symphony, named the committee for Dvořák’s Symphony No. 9 in E minor, “From the New World,” more commonly known as the “New World Symphony.” In addition to the capstone, there are inscriptions on the floor at various locations of the terminals, which have aroused the suspicions of some not-so-great internet sleuths. In many cases, there is a claim that the engravings are in some secret cabalistic language, and that nobody outside of some feted secret society knows what they mean. In actuality, they are in the Navajo language, and the translations are as follows. DZIT DIT GAII: The Mountain that is White (or, more simply, White Mountain) NIINENII NIICIE: Tallow River (the translated Navajo name for the branch of the South Platte River which flows near DIA) SIS NAAJINI: A mountain sacred to the Navajo people, said to be the eastern boundary of the Dinetah (Mount Blanca or Blanca Peak) In addition to the Navajo inscriptions, there’s one other item inscribed in the floor which has had quite a fuss made of it, despite being arguably the least mysterious of the lot. It’s an image of a mine cart, with the cryptic letters “Au Ag” inscribed within. You might be tempted to think, given that Au and Ag are the chemical symbols for Gold and Silver respectively, that this image was a fairly straightforward acknowledgment of Colorado’s history of mining both gold and silver. And you would be correct. However, that hasn’t stopped this benign and innocuous design from raising alarm bells among people who can’t take anything at face value. The claim relating to this inscription is that it secretly reveals the means by which the Illuminati, Reptilians, and/or New World Order will wipe out the bulk of humanity. The “Au Ag” ostensibly refers to a virulent pathogen known as the Australian Antigen. Of course, an “antigen” is something that actually triggers an immune response, not a pathogen itself. Also, while there is in fact something called the Australia Antigen (so named because it was first found in an Australian Aboriginal patient), it is used to diagnose and treat Hepatitis B. Hardly something destined to wipe out all of humanity except the “elites,” and those destined to toil in the underground fungus mines under their watchful gaze. Claims with Baggage Perhaps the most widely known clue to the airport’s “evil agenda” (aside from the big blue horse, of course) was Leo Tanguma’s three-paneled mural titled “Children of the World Dream of Peace.” The painting, particularly the first panel, contains within it some disturbing imagery which has, unsurprisingly, stoked the imaginations of a great many people. There are many claims that it foretells the One World Government; a fascistic future in which the New World Order (or the Illuminati, or the Reptilians, etc.) has wiped out most of the population, and ruthlessly rules over what’s left of humanity with an iron fist. Of course, once the overarching concept the artist had in mind is explained, the panels make more sense. The first panel represents the horrors of war, with grieving parental figures, bombed-out buildings, and children sleeping in the rubble. The dominant central figure is a faceless soldier impaling a dove (representing peace) on the point of their sword. This is, without doubt, the panel that is most frequently cited for its sinister overtones, and often the remaining panels are not mentioned or shown. The second panel depicts impending disasters brought on by climate change. Dead animals are dotted throughout the painting. On either side, the bodies of a woman and a child lie in coffins, illustrating that humans are not immune from the impact of the changing ecosystem. Children of various ethnicities look on with expressions of shock, horror, and dismay, while behind them, a forest burns. The final, central panel is a scene of hope and optimism for the future. In it, people of all races and nationalities are seen embracing each other, smiling happily, and singing. Weapons of war are bundled in nationalistic flags, with children bearing them forward, to be beaten into plowshares. A broken statue of the soldier from the first panel lies buried and forgotten. Put together, the mural implies humanity moving past its aggressive tendencies, and defeating the ecological challenges we face. Taken as a whole, the predominant theme is one of hope for the future. Nevertheless, it’s hard to argue that much of the imagery isn't disturbing, even within the intended context. In 2018, as part of the preparation for a large-scale remodel of the Jeppesen Terminal, Leo Tanguma’s infamous murals were removed and put into storage. Another piece of artwork that receives more than its fair share of online attention is “Mustang,” the giant blue rearing horse statue with glowing red eyes, more commonly known by the nickname “Blucifer.” The fact that Luis Jiménez, the artist who created the sculpture, was killed when a piece of the artwork broke loose and severed an artery in his leg has undoubtedly helped fuel the rumors and speculation regarding the 32-foot-tall creation. However, the so-called “demonic” nature of the installation remains unsubstantiated beyond the fact that people find it eerie. The red eyes often pointed to as “proof” of its nefarious nature were actually a tribute to the artist’s father, who owned and operated a neon sign shop where Jiménez learned to weld and paint and the value of working with his hands. His wife has also recounted a story of Jiménez investigating a noise late at night and being frightened by a pair of glowing red eyes in his living room. After his initial shock, he realized that they were those of his horse Black Jack, who had somehow gotten into the house. She speculates that he chose the red eyes to illustrate the point that sometimes things can seem frightening simply because they’re unfamiliar or unexpected. Black Jack was also the model Jiménez used for the work, and the blue color was chosen because the horse was a Blue Roan Appaloosa, a breed with a mix of black and white hairs, giving it a distinctive blue tint. Still another sculpture that garnered the ire of the internet was a 22-foot sculpture of Anubis, the Ancient Egyptian god of death. The piece was erected in June 2010, and was part of an advertising campaign for the Denver Art Museum, as the traveling King Tut exhibit was on display there from June 2010 through January 2011. The piece was paid for by private funds and was removed when the exhibit left town. Nevertheless, the sculpture’s infamy lives on in the dilapidated suburbs of the internet, where it is still touted as evidence of the airport’s malevolent nature. The last piece of artwork to discuss are those of “Notre Denver,” the two “luggage gargoyles” which can be found in two of the airport’s baggage-claim areas. The creatures each perch in a Samsonite suitcase, a nod to the Samsonite factory which operated in Denver until its closure in 2001. The design of the gargoyles was inspired by those on the Notre Dame cathedral (as might be deduced from the title of the piece). As with the gargoyles of Notre Dame and many other examples of Gothic architecture, the idea is that the creature protects all they oversee. According to their creator, artist Terry Allen, they are posted in baggage claim to ensure your luggage arrives safely, on time, and at the correct carousel. Despite their innocuous tongue-in-cheek nature, their “demonic” visages have nevertheless led some to conclude that they are further evidence of the airport’s sinister secret purpose. Beneath the Surface The construction of the airport itself was rife with problems and setbacks, triggering an early onset of conspiratorial claims. One of the first was that the various problems with the design, the construction running wildly over budget, and even a badly timed metalworkers strike, were all due to the fact that the facility was being built on an ancient Native American burial ground. Note that no tribe or Native organization has ever made claims to that effect, as would be expected if that were the case. Also, the archeological evidence suggests that, while the site may have been a hunting ground, there is no evidence of remains that one would expect in a burial ground. While the airport itself is home to a staggering amount of far-fetched misinformation, there is also a great degree of speculation as to what lies beneath the airport. One claim is that, in addition to the known runways, there are also secret runways buried just below the surface, which extend for 4 or 5 miles each. When the time comes (whatever “time” that may be), they can quickly be uncovered, so that massive planes carrying the Satanic Global Elites™ can be landed safely, ensuring that they are quickly ushered to safety in the underground bunker(s). (We’ll get to those shortly.) According to many unnamed, anonymous sources, there is a vast, underground complex beneath DIA. A variety of conspiracy sites claim that much of the chaos and turmoil during the airport’s construction was actually deliberately engineered. The claim goes that by constantly altering plans, changing contractors, and shuffling around construction crews, nobody would have a clear picture of what, exactly, was being built. Well, nobody but the lizard people, of course. This claim is somewhat undermined by the fact that they also like to frequently cite one anonymous “whistleblower” who claimed to have worked on a construction crew, and therefore know exactly what was being built. This brings us to those aforementioned underground bunkers. While it’s true that there are a great many tunnels beneath the airport, the notion of what amounts to an underground city (as is often described) is fanciful at best. A facility the size of DIA requires a significant number of maintenance tunnels, not to mention the sheer amount of passenger baggage that needs to be routed throughout. It’s therefore not surprising that there is a substantial facility beneath the terminals. However, despite what Mr. Anonymous claims, there is no evidence of a 6-story-deep complex, complete with everything needed to keep a colony of “elites” alive and well through a manufactured apocalypse of their own design. Another hypothesis which has been presented is that the underground facility would be used, not for the survival of the [insert the secret society of your choosing], but rather to imprison the rebels who dared stand against their tyranny. Alternatively, some think it’s what’s known as a “DUMB” (no, seriously), an acronym for Deep Underground Military Base. This theory (I use the word in the colloquial sense, not the scientific one) says that there’s a tunnel connecting the base to the NORAD facility at Cheyenne Mountain. For the record, the longest road tunnel in the world is the Lærdal tunnel in Norway, a stunning engineering feat which measures in at around 15 miles, 6 times shorter than the imaginary 90-mile-long tunnel would have to be. (I specify road tunnel, since tunnels designed to transport water, rather than people or resources, can extend significantly further.) Again, as with so many of these claims, there is no actual evidence to support any of these assertions, and it’s all just based on speculation, conjecture, and paranoia. For those who have decided that the underground structures, or any of the other things listed in this post, have an insidiously evil secret purpose, no mundane explanation will satisfy, regardless of how reasonable and well-supported it is. The question remains: If a secret organization really was conspiring to wipe out humanity (or whatever else their evil schemes entail), why would they deliberately and intentionally leave so many clues behind? The Georgia Guidestones was a mysterious monument on which are carved ten “commandments” for a “New Age of Reason”. The first commandment? Maintaining the world population under 500 million people. Ready for another sinister fact? The authors of what was called the American Stonehenge are still a “mystery. ”In this video we will look at the numerous features that defined this monument, its dark message calling for a New World Order, and explain why the occult secret society that built it decided that 2022 was the year to bring it down. Upon on the granite slabs was written ten “commandments” or “guides” engraved in eight different world languages. These guides touch upon subjects that are associated with the “New World Order”, including massive depopulation, a single world government, the introduction of a new type of spirituality, and allusions to controls over human reproduction and eugenics. However, it was the very first guide that made the Guidestones so controversial: "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature." In order to obtain a population of less than 500 million, humanity needs to be reduced by about 94%. For this reason, the Guidestones were believed to be concrete proof of the elite’s interest in massive depopulation. The World Economic Forum, led by Klaus Schwab, have made clear their plans for humanity. Schwab’s right-hand-man, Yuval Noah Harari, recently declared that the WEF considers the vast majority of the human population to be useless and obsolete. And if you wonder who will be the lucky few to survive the great depopulation, the WEF has an answer for you. Surprise, surprise: it’s the global elite, who will survive the mass extinction event courtesy of what Yuval Harari describes as a “technological Noah’s Ark.” Throughout the years, the monument was the site of strange rituals and gatherings of pagan and occult groups – often on dates with astronomical significance. It was also the target of acts of vandalism as satanic symbols and messages against the New World Order were spray painted on the structure on numerous occasions. Then on July 6 2022, at 4am, an explosive device was detonated by “unknown individuals”. The blast reduced one of the slabs to rubble and severely damaged the capstone. After the detonation, a car was filmed leaving the scene. Then a few hours later, the structure was completely demolished due to “safety reasons”. While the real Stonehenge is still standing after 5000 years, America’s Stonehenge, with its guides for a new world order, barely lasted 40 years. So who ordered the Guidestones to be built? Who gave the order to tear it down? And most importantly, why? In 2013, Wyatt Martin, the man who helped broker the arrangement for the monument said: “I made an oath to that man, and I can’t break that. No one will ever know”. With that being said, for those in the know there never a was a “mystery” about those behind the Guidestones. They were always hiding in plain sight. The pseudonym of the man referred to by Wyatt Martin was “R.C. Christian.” This is a reference to Christian Rosenkreuz, the legendary founder of the Rosicrucian Order, also known as the Order of the Rose Cross (R.C.) – a secret society that played the role of a hidden hand, greatly influencing world events for centuries. Everything about this monument pointed directly to the occult elite and the secret societies that fuel its philosophy. Although the monument is gone, the New World Order ideals behind it are not. These ideals have existed for centuries. However, in the 21st century, things have changed. While the masses were once completely oblivious about the agenda of the global elite, the information age has caused a mass awakening. Now, the plans of the occult elite are met with increasing resistance. This brings us to the reason the Guidestones were destroyed and their globalist message erased. In an age of misleading and confusing propaganda, the Guidestones were simply too clear, too concise, and too damning. The globalist elite’s true intentions — including world government, depopulation, and eugenics — were literally etched in stone, for all to see. This is why the Guidestones were torn down. The elite no longer want us to know about their long-term goals for humanity. Unelected global elites, led by Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum, are putting all of the Georgia Guidestones’ commandments into action. While the Guidestones are gone, the ten “commandments” or “guides” inscribed on the granite walls continue to shine a light on the dark deeds of the elite and explain their true agenda. It is important that we share this important information and wake up as many people as we possibly can. This is the only way to defeat those who wish to usher in a New World Order, with all that it entails. Here at The People’s Voice we will keep exposing the secret societies that run the world and document the agenda of the global elite. Why The Globalist Elite Had To Destroy the Georgia Guidestones in 2022 The Georgia Guidestones was a mysterious monument on which are carved ten “commandments” for a “New Age of Reason”. The first commandment? Maintaining the world population under 500 million people. Ready for another sinister fact? The authors of what was called the American Stonehenge are still a “mystery”… except for those in the know. In the video we will look at the numerous features that defined this monument, its dark message calling for a New World Order, and explain why the occult secret society that built it decided that 2022 was the year to bring it down. Made of four massive slabs of Pyramid blue granite, the Georgia Guidestones were 20 feet high and formed a mysterious landmark in Elberton county, Georgia. While the landmark was strange enough to attract attention from afar, it was the text inscribed on the stones that was of most interest. Upon on the granite slabs was written ten “commandments” or “guides” engraved in eight different world languages. A shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient languages’ scripts: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs. It is important to note that those last four ancient languages are of great importance in the teachings of occult secret societies, such as the Freemasons and the Rosicrucians, groups which we will discuss later. These guides touch upon subjects that are associated with the “New World Order”, including massive depopulation, a single world government, the introduction of a new type of spirituality, and allusions to controls over human reproduction and eugenics. However, it was the very first guide that made the Guidestones so controversial: Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. In order to obtain a population of less than 500 million, humanity needs to be reduced by about 94%. For this reason, the Guidestones were believed to be concrete proof of the elite’s interest in massive depopulation. Does this sound familiar? Anyone who has been paying attention in recent years will have noticed the elite are fixated on this issue. Bill Gates was caught admitting that he hopes vaccines and birth control reduce the human population. And Gates is not alone. The World Economic Forum, led by Klaus Schwab, have made clear their plans for humanity. Schwab’s right-hand-man, Yuval Noah Harari, recently declared that the WEF considers the vast majority of the human population to be useless and obselete. According to Harari, so-called “common people” are right to be fearful of a future in which they will be made “redundant”. Such fears are justified, according to Harari, who spoke on behalf of the elites and confirmed “We just don’t need the vast majority of you.” Harari’s comments are deeply disturbing because when they are placed in context with comments by other WEF advisors like Bill Gates and Jane Goodall, it becomes clear the Georgia Guidestones “commandments” are being followed by a global elite. It’s almost as if they are reading a script straight from the granite slabs of the Georgia Guidestones. And if you wonder who will be the lucky few to survive the great depopulation, the WEF has an answer for you. Surprise, surprise: it’s the global elite, who will survive the mass extinction event courtesy of what Yuval Harari describes as a “technological Noah’s Ark.” With that being said, the Guidestones are now consigned to history. Before we explain why they were destroyed, it’s worth revisiting the destruction. Throughout the years, the landmark attracted lots of attention from those who revered it and those who hated it alike. Indeed, the monument was the site of strange rituals and gatherings of pagan and occult groups – often on dates with astronomical significance. It was also the target of acts of vandalism as satanic symbols and messages against the New World Order were spray painted on the structure on numerous occasions. Then on July 6 2022, at around 4am, an explosive device was detonated by “unknown individuals”. The blast reduced one of the slabs to rubble and severely damaged the capstone. After the detonation, a car was filmed leaving the scene. The Georgia Bureau of Investigation said in a statement that it is investigating the explosion together with the Elbert County Sheriff’s Office. While the real Stonehenge is still standing after 5000 years, America’s Stonehenge, with its guides for a new world order, barely lasted 40 years. So who ordered the Guidestones to be built? Who gave the order to tear it down? And most importantly, why? In 2013, Wyatt Martin, the man who helped broker the arrangement for the monument said: “I made an oath to that man, and I can’t break that. No one will ever know”. With that being said, for those in the know there never a was a “mystery” about those behind the Guidestones. They were always hiding in plain sight. The pseudonym of the mysterious man referred to by Wyatt Martin was “R.C. Christian.” This is a rather blatant reference to Christian Rosenkreuz, the legendary founder of the Rosicrucian Order, also known as the Order of the Rose Cross (R.C.) – a secret society that played the role of a hidden hand, greatly influencing world events for centuries. Everything about this monument pointed directly to the occult elite and the secret societies that fuel its philosophy. Although the monument is gone, the New World Order ideals behind it are not. These ideals have existed for centuries. However, in the 21st century, things have changed. While the masses were once completely oblivious about the agenda of the global elite, the information age has caused a mass awakening. Now, the plans of the occult elite are met with increasing resistance and pushback. This brings us to the reason the Guidestones were destroyed and their globalist message erased. In an age of misleading and confusing propaganda, the Guidestones were simply too clear, too concise, and too damning. The globalist elite’s true intentions — including world government, depopulation, and eugenics — were literally etched in stone, for all to see. This is why the Guidestones were torn down. The elite no longer want us to know about their long-term goals for humanity. Unelected global elites, led by Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum, are putting all of the Georgia Guidestones’ commandments into action. These days, they are trying to hide their true intentions behind several layers of drivel, hogwash, corporate-speak and propaganda in order to keep the masses in the dark, where they think they belong. However, while the Guidestones are gone, the ten “commandments” or “guides” inscribed on the granite walls continue to shine a light on the dark deeds of the elite and explain their true agenda. It is important that we share this important information and wake up as many people as we possibly can. This is the only way to defeat those who wish to usher in a New World Order, with all that it entails. Here at The People’s Voice we will keep exposing the secret societies that run the world and document the agenda of the global elite. Please like and subscribe the video below, and do your part to spread the word. We are all in this together. The Georgia Guidestones are a set of four monolithic upright stones engraved with ten new "commandments" in eight languages, including English, Russian, Hebrew, Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Spanish, and Swahili. The upper capstone has a message in four languages, including Sanskrit, Egyptian Hieroglyphics, Babylonian Cuneiform, and Classical Greek, which reads "Let these be Guide stones to an Age of Reason." The engraved messages on each side of the columns consist of ten commandments in eight languages, including English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Traditional Chinese, and Russian. The Georgia Guidestones have become a subject of interest for conspiracy theorists, with some conservative Christians calling the monument Satanic. Some truth seekers claim that the monument foretells a bleak future involving mass cull of the global population. The Ten Principles of the Georgia Guidestones, America's Strangest Monument. Are you familiar with the Georgia Guidestones? When someone first mentioned it to me I thought it both interesting and strange. Located 90 miles East of Atlanta, the monument consists of a set of 10 guidelines inscribed on a stone manmade structure in eight modern languages. At the top there's also a short message inscribed in four ancient language scripts. Some people are calling it an "American Stonehenge." The slabs and capstone stand just over 19 feet tall. The creators of this monument have chosen to remain anonymous and the man who conveyed the instructions to the Eberton Granite Finishing Company 19 miles away used a pseudonym. Obviously it cost a pretty penny to produce and install. Purportedly the group behind this had spent twenty years in planning. The inscriptions are in the following languages: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Traditional Chinese, and Russian. The ten commandments inscribed there are as follows: 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature. A lot of it sounds "nice" but one gets a little concerned about the first two, the first especially. I'm curious how they propose to reduce the earth's population by seven billion in order to fulfill their concept of balance with nature. Does the second statement refer to a return to eugenicists helping create a more perfect race? Is it Brave New World inspired, as if Huxley's book were a manual, instead of a red flag? Heres what WIRED wrote about the Guidestones: The Georgia Guidestones may be the most enigmatic monument in the US: huge slabs of granite, inscribed with directions for rebuilding civilization after the apocalypse. Only one man knows who created them—and he's not talking. The strangest monument in America looms over a barren knoll in northeastern Georgia. Five massive slabs of polished granite rise out of the earth in a star pattern. The rocks are each 16 feet tall, with four of them weighing more than 20 tons apiece. Together they support a 25,000-pound capstone. Approaching the edifice, it's hard not to think immediately of England's Stonehenge or possibly the ominous monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey. Built in 1980, these pale gray rocks are quietly awaiting the end of the world as we know it. THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MASONIC NATIONAL MEMORIAL THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MASONIC NATIONAL MEMORIAL Few men have inspired generations of Freemasons in the way that the United States’ founding fathers have. George Washington, in particular, stands out for his keen military intellect, natural political savviness, and his unparalleled credentials as a leader. He was instrumental in defeating the British during the American Revolution and played an indispensable role in adopting and ratifying our nation’s Constitution. As the first president, he implemented and oversaw a robust national government and advocated for broad religious freedom. A mural in Memorial Hall depicts George Washington in full Masonic regalia as he lays the cornerstone of the US Capitol. Mural by Allyn Cox, photo by Mount Vernon. Washington was guided by the Masonic principles of brotherly love, relief, and truth throughout his illustrious career. His life was one of service, reflective of the lessons passed through centuries of men striving to contribute to something greater than themselves. Brother Washington’s accomplishments have long spoken to men in and out of the fraternity. His lasting influence remains set in stone at The George Washington Masonic National Memorial in Washington D.C. This project required the cooperation of Freemasons from all corners of the United States of America. WORSHIPFUL MASTER WASHINGTON George Washington’s Masonic journey began when he was a young man of 20. He was raised a Master Mason in 1752 in Fredericksburg, Virginia. He immediately became a regular attendee for meetings at the Lodge of Fredericksburg and took an active role in the community. He famously stated that Freemasonry was “founded on benevolence and to be exercised for the good of mankind.” As his military and political career progressed, Brother Washington maintained correspondence with his brethren and often accepted invitations to lodge events, attending celebrations and rituals throughout the states. During the Revolution, he supported men within the military in their efforts to create Masonic lodges. Washington even helped establish Alexandria Lodge No. 22 in Virginia in 1788 and was promptly made its first Master. All told, George Washington was an active Freemason for 47 years and attended many fraternal ceremonies in that time. None as famous as the ceremonial placement of the cornerstone of the United States Capitol on September 18, 1793. During his presidential term, Washington laid the cornerstone of the capitol building in a Masonic ritual assisted by the Grand Master of Maryland, Joseph Clark, and three Worshipful Masters. Together, they delivered the customary corn, wine, and oil sacrifices before Washington struck the stone three times with a gavel. A more fitting scene is hard to imagine than the father of our nation laying the cornerstone of the building that to this day is the embodiment of the United States and the freedoms it promises. Following his death, many of the president’s personal effects were donated to Alexandria Lodge No. 22. These artifacts became known as “Washingtonia,” and included items from his tenure as the lodge’s first Master. THE FIRST MEMORIAL Given his many accomplishments in service to both Americans and the fraternity, it’s no surprise that the men of Fredericksburg Lodge No. 4 in Virginia conceived of erecting a posthumous Masonic memorial for George Washington. In 1852, the lodge sought funds from Grand Lodges to construct a memorial Masonic Temple with a large statue in the vestibule. The Grand Lodges obliged, and before long, the adequate funds were raised to commission a life-size bronze statue of the former president in Masonic regalia from the famous sculptor, Hiram Powers. The completed statue was erected in Alexandria in 1861, where it stood until 1863, when it was moved to Richmond in the throes of the Civil War. Sadly, the figure was consumed by fire as Richmond surrendered to the Army of the Potomac on April 3, 1865. THE ASSOCIATION By 1907, Grand Masters and influential Masons throughout the United States were eager to create a new George Washington Memorial. A committee convened in Alexandria-Washington Lodge No. 22 that year to establish the George Washington Masonic National Memorial Association. In 1910, the Association set to construct a new memorial on Shooter’s Hill in eastern Alexandria, Virginia, enlisting famed skyscraper architect Harvey Wiley Corbett to design the memorial. Model of the George Washington Masonic National Memorial in 1922 as created by Henry Corbett. Corbett quickly concocted a model that reimagined Alexandria’s ancient Lighthouse in Egypt and featured both Neoclassical and modern skyscraper architectural elements. His final design received enthusiastic support from the memorial association, and the ground was officially broken on June 5, 1922. On November 1, 1923, President Calvin Coolidge laid the memorial’s cornerstone with the help of a trowel once used by George Washington. The ceremony saw 14,000 Masons, dignitaries, United States armed forces personnel, police, and others attend and march in a parade from the Alexandria waterfront to Shooter’s Hill. MASONS SET TO LABOR Building the George Washington Masonic National Memorial proved to be a slow yet steady process. Such an impressive structure proved expensive, and the entire project required a fiscally responsible approach relying solely on donations from Masonic lodges. The building was slowly constructed over the next decade, it towers ten levels high and rising over 300 feet, with construction of the exterior concluding on February 8, 1931. The Grand Chapter of Virginia of Royal Arch Masonry donated the aluminum double-keystone symbol and light at the top of the building. At the time, it was the biggest fixture of its kind in the world. In 1932, the memorials dedication ceremony was held, with an estimated 150,000 people in attendance, many of whom slept in train cars due to lack of hotel accommodations. Despite heavy rains on the day of the event, 15,000 people paraded through Alexandria to the memorial before the dedication ceremony, including 5,000 U.S. military personnel and 3,000 Knights Templar. Masons from all over the world representing every branch of U.S. Freemasonry attended, as well as President Hoover and nearly his entire Cabinet. Astonishingly, the Washington Masonic Memorial was built without incurring debt as the Association was adamant about refusing to approve any funding for materials or services until the money for each effort was secured. With the exterior complete, construction on the interior of the building ensued. It would continue for nearly 40 years, with progress slowing significantly throughout the 1930s and 40s as funding and materials dwindled during the Great Depression and Second World War. After the war, work on the building proceeded earnestly. With men returning to the states, Freemasons were eager to educate the public on the fraternity and the life of brother George Washington. Alexandria-Washington Lodge No. 22 opened a replica lodge room to display original Washington artifacts. In 1950, President Harry S. Truman, a Past Grand Master of Missouri, dedicated a massive 17-foot bronze statue of George Washington. Today, the figure stands at the building’s entrance, welcoming visitors as they enter the memorial. In 1966, a museum devoted to the life of George Washington opened on the fourth floor. The George Washington Masonic Memorial was officially completed in 1970. The memorial spans 36 acres, with the first and second floors open to all visitors. Those who wish to see the other floors can take one of the regular tours, led by a docent. The building was formally designated a National Historic Landmark in 2015 out of respect for its architecture and as one of the largest-scale private memorials to honor Washington. A FEAT OF BROTHERLY LOVE The George Washington Masonic National Memorial is a true representation of the passion of our brethren. Funded entirely by Freemasons, it is the only Masonic building supported by all 52 Grand Lodges of the United States. Its memorial theater is frequently booked for various programs, including historical seminars and lectures to comedy shows and community programming. It is the perfect monument to a man who in his life worked to cultivate a robust Masonic community and live the tenets of Freemasonry daily. The memorial continues to educate the public about Freemasonry, improving understanding about the brotherhood and its work. For any Mason worldwide, it is a worthwhile pilgrimage sure to make you flush with pride. The UN Agenda 2030, launched in 2015, aims to end poverty in all its forms and envision a world of universal respect for human rights and dignity, the rule of law, justice, equality, and non-discrimination. It is grounded in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and international human rights treaties and emphasizes the responsibilities of all states to respect, protect, and promote human rights. The Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity, and seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are an urgent call for action by all countries, developed and developing, in a global partnership, addressing global challenges related to poverty, inequality, climate change, environmental degradation, peace, and justice. Achieving the SDGs could open up US$12 trillion of market opportunities and create 380 million new jobs by 2030. UN Invasion, Martial Law, Rex 84 Death Camps, Globalist Purge, Operation Cable Splicer - https://rumble.com/v41h3zp-un-invasion-martial-law-rex-84-death-camps-globalist-purge-operation-cable-.html Guide To Understanding Globalist Purge FEMA Quarantine Re-Education Death Camp - https://rumble.com/v41deia-guide-to-understanding-globalist-purge-fema-quarantine-re-education-death-c.html Per U.S.A. Government Everyone Is A Criminal Confiscation All Property & All Assets - https://rumble.com/v3t6igt-per-u.s.a.-government-everyone-is-a-criminal-confiscation-all-property-and-.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html This Is UN 4G3NDA 21 Aw4reness Is The First Step In The R3SlST4NC3 By The People - https://rumble.com/v2yky8g-this-is-un-4g3nda-21-aw4reness-is-the-first-step-in-the-r3slst4nc3-by-the-p.html UN Report Calls For Decriminalization Of Sex Between Adults/Children Age 8+Up - https://rumble.com/v2qo62c-un-report-calls-for-decriminalization-of-sex-between-adultschildren-age-8-u.html UN New Legal Principles Launched On International Women’s and Trans Women Day to advance decriminalization efforts In March 2023, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of "new legal principles" that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally. Principle 16, titled "consensual sexual conduct," stated that sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual. The principles were the product of a 2018 workshop between the three organizations and developed over the next five years based on feedback and reviews from a range of experts and stakeholders. The principles did not call for the abolishment of any minimum age of consent, but rather that criminal laws should not be biased in favor of any sex/gender, or age of consent to marriage. Most US states set the age of consent at 16, with Arizona, North Dakota, Oregon, and Virginia setting theirs at 15, so adults in most US states are already legally allowed to have sex with children/adolescents, as per UN definition.

We The True People's Of U.S.A. "Open Your Eye Before You Die" America's True Shocking Secret Political History. Great American Adventure The Secret Systems Of Control Used By The Ancient Royal Bloodlines And The Globalist Ruling Elite And How Everything Prepared The Way For The Coming New World Order. This Is One Most Influential Books Ever Written Today. We At This Channel Hope You Enjoy This True Five Part Video Series. The True America's Secret History 1776 Thru 2024 Today. Since the founding of our Country, the 'Elite' (and their Robber Baron Partners) have fabricated our history, taken control of our economy and altered our form of Government and our Legal System. The Judge describes the people and events responsible for America's current state of deterioration. "The Illuminati are hell bent upon making Bible Prophecy come true and are responsible for much of the Biblical like devastation that has been occurring around the Earth." We won't be able to stop them or even protect ourselves unless we understand their modus operandi. The United States of America is Not a Nation, or Country. (It Is A Corporation) It Has No Laws, Only Corporate Statutes. Every Government Agency is Not Part of the Federal Government, but is Owned by the United Nations. The UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. Go to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Judge Dale describes the rise of the Babylonian Slave Driving System and the Babylonian Money Magic Khazarian - Sabbatean Banking System that was Created by Hammarabi. This is the Basis of our Modern System of International Commerce that is Ruled through Admiralty Law. Our Founding Fathers were Not who or what you think they were. Our History is Not what you think it is. We were completely Betrayed by our Politicians, both past and present. Jude Dale presents the most shocking and amazing secrets of America's True Political History. This turns out entire history upside down. Very much of this information is So Shocking, that it may be extremely hard to believe or accept. If you hear something that offends you, or is too hard for you to believe, continue listening. This is packed with hard core facts, most of which you are not likely to learn elsewhere. I hope you appreciate my efforts in sharing this with you. It took me 5 part video's attempts before I could record it properly. I spent all day. The Double Dealing of Washington. The Tyranny of Lincoln. The Reconstruction Act. The War Powers Act. The 13th Amendment Barred Layers. All Lawyers Swear Loyalty to the Crown. Enslavement Through Corporations. The High Treason of FDR. Citizens Declared Enemies of the State. Straw Man Corporate Fiction. You Are Owned By The State. You Are A Traded Commodity. The Khazarian Federal Reserve. You Don't Own Your Own Land. Why You Must Get License's. You And Your Children Are Wards of the Court. You Were Tricked Into Paying The National Debt. The 21 Points of Manifesto of the New World Order and Plan to Control and Enslave the World by July 4th 2026 on this the day of Old America’s up coming 250nd year of independence. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf Inscriptions: A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. The languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the two major political parties in the United States. The main differences between them lie in their ideologies, policies, and values. Democratic Party: Generally considered liberal, the Democratic Party typically supports a larger government role in economic issues, backing regulations and social welfare programs. They favor a progressive tax to finance the government’s expanded role and often endorse funding social programs through taxation. Democrats also tend to support environmental protection, gun control, less-strict immigration laws, and worker rights. Republican Party: Seen as conservative, the Republican Party typically wants a smaller government that is less involved in the economy. They support lower taxes for all and an economy with fewer government regulations and fewer government-funded social programs. Republicans also tend to desire a strong national defense and the aggressive pursuit of U.S. national security interests, often supporting states’ rights against the power of the federal government. Key issues where Democrats and Republicans differ include abortion, with Democrats generally arguing for women’s access to abortion and Republicans having more varied opinions ranging from wanting more restrictions to total bans. Additionally, the parties have differing views on the role of government in society, with Democrats believing it’s the government’s job to make society fairer and Republicans advocating for less government influence over people’s lives. It’s worth noting that while these general trends hold, individual members of each party may have diverse views, and the parties’ positions can evolve over time. Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts Anyway! Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply. The Inheritance Tax. Accounts Receivable Tax. Airline Surcharge Tax. Airline Fuel Tax. Airport Maintenance Tax. Bridge Crossing Tax or Toll Tax. Building Permit Tax. Cat License Tax. Cigarette Tax. Corporate Income Tax. Death Tax. Dog License Tax. Driving Permit Tax. Environmental Tax (Fee). Excise Taxes. Federal Income Tax. Federal Unemployment (UI). Fishing License Tax. Food License Tax. Gasoline Tax. Gross Receipts Tax. Health Tax. Hunting License Tax. Hydro Tax. Inheritance Tax. Interest Tax. Liquor Tax. Luxury Taxes. Marriage License Tax. Medicare Tax. Mortgage Tax. Parking Meter Tax. Personal Income Tax. Property Tax. Poverty Tax. Prescription Drug Tax. Provincial Income And Sales Tax. Real Estate Tax. Recreational Vehicle Tax. Retail Sales Tax. Service Charge Tax. School Tax. Sin Tax. State Park Service Tax. Telephone Federal Tax. Telephone Federal, Provincial and Local Surcharge Taxes. Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax. Vehicle License Registration Tax. Vehicle Sales Tax. Water Tax. Watercraft Registration Tax. Well Permit Tax. Workers Compensation Tax. U.S. National Parks Service Tax. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. So Again You Think This Funny In 2025 ? Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Meet Your Strawman ? Your Birth Certificate Is Worth Millions ? Swindled by U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dmnio-meet-your-strawman-your-birth-certificate-is-worth-millions-swindled-by-u.s.html The story of how everyone has a strawman or strawwoman or strawtransgene so i hope everyone is happy now. it's created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative animation made in the spirit of freedom. Meet your ‘strawman and woman’ – the fake ‘you’ the government creates in your name to control you and how you can stop it. How you can lawfully disconnect yourself, your family and your business from governments and the institutions of law enforcement and no longer comply with ‘Covid’19/21/24 fascism. so talks with your common law expert. A must-watch for those who choose freedom and want to end this madness. We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights - https://rumble.com/v2d7y7w-we-the-sheeple-people-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-a-real-bill-of-st.html The Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. Welcome People's Republic Of U.S.A. Gangs-Riots-Looting-Protests Propaganda Etc.. - https://rumble.com/v2yxck6-welcome-peoples-republic-of-u.s.a.-gangs-riots-looting-protests-propaganda-.html We Our Smartest People In The World Today Felons, Illegals And MS13 Other Gangs Riots Looting Protests Propaganda Sign. Welcome Sign Reads "Official Sanctuary State" Sign At California Border and Other Sanctuary States in U.S.A. https://bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_16.htm Welcome To Our Channel In 2025 Thank You For Watching Our Channel (What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?) Yes We All The True People Of The U.S.A. Want To Welcome You To The New World Order In The Year Zero. The Real True Origin of the World Today and The New National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. A symbolic example of this secret truth is contained within the National Bird of the United States. Many Americans and people around the world think that our National Bird of the U.S. is an eagle. They are wrong. The symbolic bird you will find on the Great Seal of the United States is actually the mythical bird known as a Phoenix. The scroll in the beak of the Phoenix is the Latin motto of 13 letters, E Pluribus Unum, meaning in English, ” Out of Many, One”. Later an olive branch and a bundle of 13 arrows (representing peace and war, respectively) were included in the claws of the phoenix. Over its head there appears 13 stars that are arranged in rows of 1-4-3-4-1, forming a six-pointed star. The Star of David and symbol of Israel. Your Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws Work And What Is And Why Is U.S.A. Laws Are Under A Gold Fringe Flag? So have you ever walked into a court room and notice a gold fringe flag hanging in the room? Did you ever wonder why every single flag in court rooms and government buildings is a gold fringe flag? And do you remember how many times you pledged your allegiance to that flag? “I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.” Reciting the pledge was the first things we did in school every day, from day one of first grade, to the last day of eighth grade. So, after eight years of repetition, the neuro-pathways are grooved in deep into our brains. And our loyalty so strong to the red, white and blue. Then, one day, we wake up in our adult world, and guess what? The flag now has gold fringe around it and we NEVER asked why? Why is this flag different than the one we were taught to love and be loyal to? We never questioned it. We just assumed it was the same, dear old stripes and stars, and went about out busy little lives. So, the flag in the court room is a gold fringe flag. Who cares? That doesn’t affect me, right? You should care and yes, it does affect you. The gold fringe flag is a clear sign of a system being in place that is not the system we are taught to believe is in place. A gold fringe flag was historically used during times of war in maritime admiralty law(which we are in right now as well). The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. Also, you will notice the tassels hanging from the flag. These are also symbolic of admiralty law, which is the law of the sea. So, wait a minute? Our flags that hang in our government buildings and court rooms are actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law?? Yes. We are in fact, functioning in maritime admiralty law, and our court system is actually upholding a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America. Well, actually, the UNITED STATES does have a constitution but it is not the same as the original Constitution that was drafted for the republic. This is why the gold fringed flag controversy is such a big deal, because it symbolize. So, now it is up to us to figure out how to navigate our way through the law of the sea, in order to find our remedies. The possibilities for this are endless. But it basically boils down to either mastering the current system and learning how to navigate your way through it, without incurring personal liability for anything. Or, separating yourself completely from the system, and moving yourself back to common law. In other words, you can go as far as expatriating yourself from the UNITED STATES so that you no longer belong to that corporation. Therefore, their rules would no longer apply to you. Cool, huh? What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. This Channel Is Up For 666 Day Now And Rumble Said We Have Made In Ad Money A Total Of $682 Dollars As Of Nov. 12, 2024 So Our Ave. Money Is $1.02 Cents A Day. Yes This Channel Is Not About Making Money At ALL. Thank You Everyone For Over 5 Million+ Views And For Watching All Of Our 872 Video's In 2022 - 2024. We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. All religion is a tool to have more control over the people's thoughts and behavior. Now religion is basically a pyramid scheme making the few at the top rich. Why does a church need a 15 million dollar compound with multiple buildings? Why does the pastor usually drive a nice new mercedes or BMW while the flock struggles and still gives the church money every week? Don't people join the church to change their life and help others the same way? It's like politicians, they should almost be volunteer jobs or just low paying. Otherwise you just keep getting people who want more money regardless of how they get it. Take from the poor and keep it doesn't sound like caring for the people. For the most part big churches were corrupted centuries ago with power hungry people. Now it's greed, a larger flock or church means they get more money every week!! The only way to attack illegal activity is to focus on the illegal activity and its perpetrators, former President Reagan argued in a 1983 speech. “You won’t get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There’s only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don’t actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time,” he said. all gun laws are unconstitutional therefore illegal and void. no government official anywhere in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to pass or enforce any form of gun laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America under the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment shall not be Infringed clause, 9th amendment enumeration clause, 10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause, 14th amendment section 1 no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause combined anyone passing or enforcing any form of gun laws anywhere in the united states of America are guilty of felony crimes in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section §241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section §242, if they are working with or on behalf of any anti Gun organizations, association, movement, group they are guilty in violation of Title 5 U.S.C. section §7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5), they are guilty of Perjury in violating oath of office swearing false oath, insurrection and rebellion against the constitution of the united states of America, and Treason. Yes that's what our second amendment exists for to take down terrorist tyrant traitors calling themselves government. "You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan The natural right to keep & bear arms protects all of our other natural rights. Two of the very few reasons government exists is to protect the country and protect the natural rights of its citizens. However, the government, fed and state, have abandoned their purpose and have made themselves the enemy of America and Americans. They not only fail to protect our rights, they steal our wealth to spend Attacking our natural rights and trying to replace them with socialist welfare & subsidies like murdering babies & state-mismanaged death care. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2025. Titles Of Nobility Amendment To 'Restore' legitimate 13th Amendment To The U.S. Constitution - https://rumble.com/v6hk6od-titles-of-nobility-amendment-to-restore-legitimate-13th-amendment-to-the-u..html True Titles Of Nobility Our early legislators were so concerned regarding the "still" close relationship with the British Crown hence Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which is included in the Constitution. The Titles of Nobility Amendment was proposed in 1810 and submitted to the states for ratification. By early 1812, eleven states had ratified the amendment. However, it required ratification by thirteen states to become part of the Constitution. On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811), New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it. The amendment would have stripped United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power". It was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland and passed by Congress on May 1, 1810. The amendment was intended to prevent U.S. citizens from accepting titles of nobility from foreign powers, reflecting concerns about European influence on the young republic. The amendment's text states: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Despite claims by some individuals known as "Thirteenthers" that the amendment was actually ratified and became part of the Constitution, official records and communications from the U.S. government confirm that it did achieve the necessary ratifications to become law. In 1789 Senator Tristrain Dalton (MA) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for ANY American accepting a "title of nobility" (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn't passed, this was the first time a "title of nobility" amendment was proposed. 1810 - 1810 - twenty years after the original suggestion of an Amendment referring to "title of Nobility", Senator Reed proposed another "Title of Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Understanding the reasoning behind the Original 13th Amendment is very important. Even in the 1700 & 1800's, most of our federally elected representatives and senators were lawyers by profession. It is true, the principle intent of the Original 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in the government. When first reading the Original 13th Amendment, with its references to "nobility", "honour", "emperor", "king" would lead most to dismiss the amendment as a petty document carrying no weight. In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment. The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by 12: 1. Maryland (December 25, 1810) 2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811) 3. Ohio (January 31, 1811) 4. Delaware (February 2, 1811) 5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811) 6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811) 7. Vermont (October 24, 1811) 8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811) 9. Georgia (November 22, 1811) 10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811) 11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812) 12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812) 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/original-13th-amendment1.html http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf The Move to 'Restore' the 13th Amendment. If there is an aspect of the human condition that is unaddressed by the platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, adopted last month at the state convention in Des Moines, you'd have to look awfully hard to find it. Its 387 enumerated planks and principles range widely over politics, culture, and economics, from sweeping statements of belief ("America is good") to the fine nuances of agricultural policy ("We support the definition of manure as natural fertilizer") and touching on the mythical "North American Union" (against) and the gold standard (for). Even so, it's a little startling to come upon section 7.19, which calls for "the reintroduction and ratification of the original 13th Amendment, not the 13th amendment in today's Constitution." Since the existing 13th Amendment bans slavery, while the "original" one was about something else entirely, the wording might give the impression that Iowa Republicans wish to reverse emancipation, which is not at all the case, according to state GOP Communications Director Danielle Plogmann. Like many aspects of Republican politics this year, it's actually about embarrassing President Obama. But you have to wonder whether the delegates knew what they were getting into. In making common cause with "Thirteenthers," as those who seek to restore the long-lost amendment are known, the party has ventured beyond the far fringes of conspiracy theory, into a mysterious lost land without lawyers or taxes. Maybe they knew what they were doing after all. This clause reads: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." http://www.thirdamendment.com/8SCIDLJ577.pdf It was an extension of Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which doesn’t allow a public office holder to receive a foreign title or similar honors without the consent of Congress. Today, the idea of a constitutional controversy about the royals may seem kind of silly, but in 1812, the United States was fighting the British and had a rocky relationship with France. The fear of both nations using noble titles as bribes, along with pensions from a foreign government, was persistent. And both the Senate and the House easily passed the TONA and passed it on to the states. By late 1812, a total of 12 states had approved the 13th Amendment and ironically, it needed a 13th state to become ratified. As the War of 1812 escalated, the TONA faded away as an issue and was never ratified. The Missing Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Since the ratification of the Constitution, thousands of constitutional amendments have been proposed, but only 27 have survived the process of Article V. Out of these, the most well known are the first 10, also known as the Bill of Rights. Interestingly, 12 amendments were originally proposed, including one on congressional compensation. This proposal later became our 27th amendment, which celebrates its 20th anniversary today. This amendment boasts the longest ratification process of any amendment—200 years! Under the Compensation Clause, Congress has the power to control its own salary. The Anti-Federalists and others at the state-ratifying conventions rightly objected to the danger of allowing this power. In response, James Madison proposed a compensation amendment stating that pay increases would apply only to the next Congress. It read: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.” This change allowed the voters to force Congress to justify their pay increases through an election. Both the House and Senate approved the proposal and sent it (along with 11 other proposed amendments) to the states. The states ratified only 10 of these, now known as the Bill of Rights, but the compensation amendment remained in limbo until the 1980s. In the early 1980s, a Texas undergraduate student’s term paper renewed the ratification effort. Arguing that the amendment’s ratification was still pending, the student raised support across the country on the amendment’s behalf. At the beginning of his campaign, only seven states had ratified the amendment, but thanks to his efforts, Michigan became the final 38th state to ratify the amendment in 1992. Not only do his efforts illustrate how one citizen can make a difference in the political process, but it also ensures that Congress remains accountable to the people. https://www.newsweek.com/move-restore-13th-amendment-74391 Below Are Some The Most Important Video's The True American History You’ll Ever Watch Today In 2025. P.S. Please Remember The Federal Reserve operates out of London and is a privately held corporation. Just as the District of Columbia, U.S.,Inc. is a foreign corporation not to be confused with the United States of America, Inc. or the united States republic or the Republic of the United States or the UNITED STATES, INC. It’s very confusing but Dunn and Bradstreet has it all. Or the SEC has allot of info. too. America's True Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.1 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6i5jxp-americas-true-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.1-babylon.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.2 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6i7pkp-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.2-be.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.3 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6iaapm-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.3-betrayal-fro.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.4 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6iccwv-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.4-babylonian-s.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.5 The Sovereign Citizens - https://rumble.com/v6idcn4-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.5-th.html Yes We The People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed America's Shocking True Secret Political History And As A Great American You Are The Real Sovereign Citizens Of U.S.A. Right Now America's Shocking Secret Political History. https://dn720005.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-great-american-adventure_202203/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2024 People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/playlists/ahtzhGqa5vE We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/v2ef8n2-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-and-international-maritime-admi.html As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html It was February 21, 1871 that the 41st US Congress sold out the Republic. On this date, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." Also known as the "Act of 1871." Congress, illegally acting on it's own behalf, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. Congress realizing that our country was in severe financial difficulty, cut a deal with the international bankers, in the process incurring a debt to those bankers. The international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city. The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated. The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the 1871 Organic Act. People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. THIS VIDEO IS SAFE TO WATCH but do not click or link To (( anticorruptionsociety )) Talked About In This Video At All... The U.S.A. Government Add A Computer Virus - Your Computer Has Been Locked - To Source Documents In This Video To Stop You! Thanks From The New World Order ! How Can We Stop or Start To Build An Anti Corruption Society ? A society is built on a structure that must have certain principles to stand firm and strong on the grounds of culture, ethics, and morality. In terms of the mentioned aspects, corruption is undoubtedly one evil that should be eliminated from a thriving society. Moreover, corruption is a factor in the system and exists in all cultures, but this phenomenon has only begun to be seriously discussed in the last 20 years. Several heavily pro-corruption reforms and initiatives have indeed been proclaimed effective, but still, no state so far has managed to control corruption through global support requirements. What is Corruption and Where Does it Exist ? Basically, corruption is the misuse of privileged status in any of the departments of government (judicial, executive and legislative) or in governmental or other organizations for the purpose of acquiring personal benefits that are not flagrantly unconstitutional for themselves or else. The culture of corruption, however, is in stark contradiction to the earliest stages of law-making as well as the state and had been regarded as immoral in the ancient times, negatively impacting the public institutions and the flourishing of the political structure. Oath Of Allegiance For New People's Republic Of United State Of America Act Today. - "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Arm Forces of the United States when required by law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." From: How to become a U S citizen by Sally Schreudin 5th Ed. (For what should be in an oath, read 8 U.S.C.A. §1448.) This is the oath that people take to become US citizens, the underlined clause is interesting, sounds like voluntary servitude. This gives a guide as to what has to be in an oath, the rejection of former allegiances with the pledge of fidelity to the nation of choice. No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government Today & Link To Top Info Wars Video's - https://rumble.com/v4w7sxh-no-oaths-of-office-in-the-federal-government-today-and-link-to-top-info-war.html No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government And Are Enemies Destroying US Government From Within As Planned On January 10th Of 1963, Forty Five Current Communist Goals Were Submitted To The Congressional Record. Number Thirteen Was, “Do Away With Loyalty Oaths.” Know One In U.S. Government Have Signed And Or Notarized Copy Or Certified Copy Of Their Oath Of Office For Over 60 Years Now. The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Any information you provide to the Republic for the United States of America is kept strictly private, unless you have given express written permission for any of those details to be made public. Contact details are used to keep you updated by email or other electronic message. If you provide a phone number or mailing address it may be distributed to a contact in your State for purposes of keeping you informed of local assemblies or a personal contact to answer any questions you may have about assisting with the restoration of the republic. Your information is never rented or sold or otherwise released for any purpose. Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick. - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... Sept. 9/11 Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers World Trade Center - https://rumble.com/v3gu5z4-sept.-911-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-towers-world-trade-cen.html https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001. This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? - https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical - https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition - https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now - https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html CIA Mind Control and CIA Secret Experiments use of biological and chemical materials. - https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html AOC Celebrate Restarting MK-Ultra Program With Progress Psychedelics Treatment. - https://rumble.com/v3045j8-aoc-celebrate-restarting-mk-ultra-program-with-progress-psychedelics-treatm.html The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). New World Order National Anthem The Ostrich Lyrics By Steppenwolf 1968 A.C.E. ! - https://rumble.com/v3yl8xx-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell A notarized copy of a document is a certified copy of the original document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public. The notary public will typically stamp the copy with their seal and signature, indicating that they have verified the authenticity of the document and the identity of the person signing it. In some cases, a notarized copy may be acceptable as evidence in court or for official purposes, but it’s always best to check with the relevant authorities or institution to confirm their specific requirements. It’s also important to note that a notarized copy is not the same as a signed copy. A signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it, but it has not been verified or authenticated by a notary public. In summary, a notarized copy is a certified copy of a document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public, while a signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. We Hope This Video Is The Great Awakening In 2025 Of The American People And Is A Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2025.

We The True People's Of U.S.A. "Open Your Eye Before You Die" America's True Shocking Secret Political History. Great American Adventure The Secret Systems Of Control Used By The Ancient Royal Bloodlines And The Globalist Ruling Elite And How Everything Prepared The Way For The Coming New World Order. This Is One Most Influential Books Ever Written Today. We At This Channel Hope You Enjoy This True Five Part Video Series. The True America's Secret History 1776 Thru 2024 Today. Since the founding of our Country, the 'Elite' (and their Robber Baron Partners) have fabricated our history, taken control of our economy and altered our form of Government and our Legal System. The Judge describes the people and events responsible for America's current state of deterioration. "The Illuminati are hell bent upon making Bible Prophecy come true and are responsible for much of the Biblical like devastation that has been occurring around the Earth." We won't be able to stop them or even protect ourselves unless we understand their modus operandi. The United States of America is Not a Nation, or Country. (It Is A Corporation) It Has No Laws, Only Corporate Statutes. Every Government Agency is Not Part of the Federal Government, but is Owned by the United Nations. The UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. Go to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Judge Dale describes the rise of the Babylonian Slave Driving System and the Babylonian Money Magic Khazarian - Sabbatean Banking System that was Created by Hammarabi. This is the Basis of our Modern System of International Commerce that is Ruled through Admiralty Law. Our Founding Fathers were Not who or what you think they were. Our History is Not what you think it is. We were completely Betrayed by our Politicians, both past and present. Jude Dale presents the most shocking and amazing secrets of America's True Political History. This turns out entire history upside down. Very much of this information is So Shocking, that it may be extremely hard to believe or accept. If you hear something that offends you, or is too hard for you to believe, continue listening. This is packed with hard core facts, most of which you are not likely to learn elsewhere. I hope you appreciate my efforts in sharing this with you. It took me 5 part video's attempts before I could record it properly. I spent all day. The Double Dealing of Washington. The Tyranny of Lincoln. The Reconstruction Act. The War Powers Act. The 13th Amendment Barred Layers. All Lawyers Swear Loyalty to the Crown. Enslavement Through Corporations. The High Treason of FDR. Citizens Declared Enemies of the State. Straw Man Corporate Fiction. You Are Owned By The State. You Are A Traded Commodity. The Khazarian Federal Reserve. You Don't Own Your Own Land. Why You Must Get License's. You And Your Children Are Wards of the Court. You Were Tricked Into Paying The National Debt. The 21 Points of Manifesto of the New World Order and Plan to Control and Enslave the World by July 4th 2026 on this the day of Old America’s up coming 250nd year of independence. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf Inscriptions: A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. The languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the two major political parties in the United States. The main differences between them lie in their ideologies, policies, and values. Democratic Party: Generally considered liberal, the Democratic Party typically supports a larger government role in economic issues, backing regulations and social welfare programs. They favor a progressive tax to finance the government’s expanded role and often endorse funding social programs through taxation. Democrats also tend to support environmental protection, gun control, less-strict immigration laws, and worker rights. Republican Party: Seen as conservative, the Republican Party typically wants a smaller government that is less involved in the economy. They support lower taxes for all and an economy with fewer government regulations and fewer government-funded social programs. Republicans also tend to desire a strong national defense and the aggressive pursuit of U.S. national security interests, often supporting states’ rights against the power of the federal government. Key issues where Democrats and Republicans differ include abortion, with Democrats generally arguing for women’s access to abortion and Republicans having more varied opinions ranging from wanting more restrictions to total bans. Additionally, the parties have differing views on the role of government in society, with Democrats believing it’s the government’s job to make society fairer and Republicans advocating for less government influence over people’s lives. It’s worth noting that while these general trends hold, individual members of each party may have diverse views, and the parties’ positions can evolve over time. Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts Anyway! Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply. The Inheritance Tax. Accounts Receivable Tax. Airline Surcharge Tax. Airline Fuel Tax. Airport Maintenance Tax. Bridge Crossing Tax or Toll Tax. Building Permit Tax. Cat License Tax. Cigarette Tax. Corporate Income Tax. Death Tax. Dog License Tax. Driving Permit Tax. Environmental Tax (Fee). Excise Taxes. Federal Income Tax. Federal Unemployment (UI). Fishing License Tax. Food License Tax. Gasoline Tax. Gross Receipts Tax. Health Tax. Hunting License Tax. Hydro Tax. Inheritance Tax. Interest Tax. Liquor Tax. Luxury Taxes. Marriage License Tax. Medicare Tax. Mortgage Tax. Parking Meter Tax. Personal Income Tax. Property Tax. Poverty Tax. Prescription Drug Tax. Provincial Income And Sales Tax. Real Estate Tax. Recreational Vehicle Tax. Retail Sales Tax. Service Charge Tax. School Tax. Sin Tax. State Park Service Tax. Telephone Federal Tax. Telephone Federal, Provincial and Local Surcharge Taxes. Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax. Vehicle License Registration Tax. Vehicle Sales Tax. Water Tax. Watercraft Registration Tax. Well Permit Tax. Workers Compensation Tax. U.S. National Parks Service Tax. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. So Again You Think This Funny In 2025 ? Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Meet Your Strawman ? Your Birth Certificate Is Worth Millions ? Swindled by U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dmnio-meet-your-strawman-your-birth-certificate-is-worth-millions-swindled-by-u.s.html The story of how everyone has a strawman or strawwoman or strawtransgene so i hope everyone is happy now. it's created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative animation made in the spirit of freedom. Meet your ‘strawman and woman’ – the fake ‘you’ the government creates in your name to control you and how you can stop it. How you can lawfully disconnect yourself, your family and your business from governments and the institutions of law enforcement and no longer comply with ‘Covid’19/21/24 fascism. so talks with your common law expert. A must-watch for those who choose freedom and want to end this madness. We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights - https://rumble.com/v2d7y7w-we-the-sheeple-people-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-a-real-bill-of-st.html The Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. Welcome People's Republic Of U.S.A. Gangs-Riots-Looting-Protests Propaganda Etc.. - https://rumble.com/v2yxck6-welcome-peoples-republic-of-u.s.a.-gangs-riots-looting-protests-propaganda-.html We Our Smartest People In The World Today Felons, Illegals And MS13 Other Gangs Riots Looting Protests Propaganda Sign. Welcome Sign Reads "Official Sanctuary State" Sign At California Border and Other Sanctuary States in U.S.A. https://bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_16.htm Welcome To Our Channel In 2025 Thank You For Watching Our Channel (What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?) Yes We All The True People Of The U.S.A. Want To Welcome You To The New World Order In The Year Zero. The Real True Origin of the World Today and The New National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. A symbolic example of this secret truth is contained within the National Bird of the United States. Many Americans and people around the world think that our National Bird of the U.S. is an eagle. They are wrong. The symbolic bird you will find on the Great Seal of the United States is actually the mythical bird known as a Phoenix. The scroll in the beak of the Phoenix is the Latin motto of 13 letters, E Pluribus Unum, meaning in English, ” Out of Many, One”. Later an olive branch and a bundle of 13 arrows (representing peace and war, respectively) were included in the claws of the phoenix. Over its head there appears 13 stars that are arranged in rows of 1-4-3-4-1, forming a six-pointed star. The Star of David and symbol of Israel. Your Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws Work And What Is And Why Is U.S.A. Laws Are Under A Gold Fringe Flag? So have you ever walked into a court room and notice a gold fringe flag hanging in the room? Did you ever wonder why every single flag in court rooms and government buildings is a gold fringe flag? And do you remember how many times you pledged your allegiance to that flag? “I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.” Reciting the pledge was the first things we did in school every day, from day one of first grade, to the last day of eighth grade. So, after eight years of repetition, the neuro-pathways are grooved in deep into our brains. And our loyalty so strong to the red, white and blue. Then, one day, we wake up in our adult world, and guess what? The flag now has gold fringe around it and we NEVER asked why? Why is this flag different than the one we were taught to love and be loyal to? We never questioned it. We just assumed it was the same, dear old stripes and stars, and went about out busy little lives. So, the flag in the court room is a gold fringe flag. Who cares? That doesn’t affect me, right? You should care and yes, it does affect you. The gold fringe flag is a clear sign of a system being in place that is not the system we are taught to believe is in place. A gold fringe flag was historically used during times of war in maritime admiralty law(which we are in right now as well). The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. Also, you will notice the tassels hanging from the flag. These are also symbolic of admiralty law, which is the law of the sea. So, wait a minute? Our flags that hang in our government buildings and court rooms are actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law?? Yes. We are in fact, functioning in maritime admiralty law, and our court system is actually upholding a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America. Well, actually, the UNITED STATES does have a constitution but it is not the same as the original Constitution that was drafted for the republic. This is why the gold fringed flag controversy is such a big deal, because it symbolize. So, now it is up to us to figure out how to navigate our way through the law of the sea, in order to find our remedies. The possibilities for this are endless. But it basically boils down to either mastering the current system and learning how to navigate your way through it, without incurring personal liability for anything. Or, separating yourself completely from the system, and moving yourself back to common law. In other words, you can go as far as expatriating yourself from the UNITED STATES so that you no longer belong to that corporation. Therefore, their rules would no longer apply to you. Cool, huh? What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. This Channel Is Up For 666 Day Now And Rumble Said We Have Made In Ad Money A Total Of $682 Dollars As Of Nov. 12, 2024 So Our Ave. Money Is $1.02 Cents A Day. Yes This Channel Is Not About Making Money At ALL. Thank You Everyone For Over 5 Million+ Views And For Watching All Of Our 872 Video's In 2022 - 2024. We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. All religion is a tool to have more control over the people's thoughts and behavior. Now religion is basically a pyramid scheme making the few at the top rich. Why does a church need a 15 million dollar compound with multiple buildings? Why does the pastor usually drive a nice new mercedes or BMW while the flock struggles and still gives the church money every week? Don't people join the church to change their life and help others the same way? It's like politicians, they should almost be volunteer jobs or just low paying. Otherwise you just keep getting people who want more money regardless of how they get it. Take from the poor and keep it doesn't sound like caring for the people. For the most part big churches were corrupted centuries ago with power hungry people. Now it's greed, a larger flock or church means they get more money every week!! The only way to attack illegal activity is to focus on the illegal activity and its perpetrators, former President Reagan argued in a 1983 speech. “You won’t get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There’s only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don’t actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time,” he said. all gun laws are unconstitutional therefore illegal and void. no government official anywhere in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to pass or enforce any form of gun laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America under the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment shall not be Infringed clause, 9th amendment enumeration clause, 10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause, 14th amendment section 1 no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause combined anyone passing or enforcing any form of gun laws anywhere in the united states of America are guilty of felony crimes in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section §241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section §242, if they are working with or on behalf of any anti Gun organizations, association, movement, group they are guilty in violation of Title 5 U.S.C. section §7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5), they are guilty of Perjury in violating oath of office swearing false oath, insurrection and rebellion against the constitution of the united states of America, and Treason. Yes that's what our second amendment exists for to take down terrorist tyrant traitors calling themselves government. "You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan The natural right to keep & bear arms protects all of our other natural rights. Two of the very few reasons government exists is to protect the country and protect the natural rights of its citizens. However, the government, fed and state, have abandoned their purpose and have made themselves the enemy of America and Americans. They not only fail to protect our rights, they steal our wealth to spend Attacking our natural rights and trying to replace them with socialist welfare & subsidies like murdering babies & state-mismanaged death care. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2025. Titles Of Nobility Amendment To 'Restore' legitimate 13th Amendment To The U.S. Constitution - https://rumble.com/v6hk6od-titles-of-nobility-amendment-to-restore-legitimate-13th-amendment-to-the-u..html True Titles Of Nobility Our early legislators were so concerned regarding the "still" close relationship with the British Crown hence Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which is included in the Constitution. The Titles of Nobility Amendment was proposed in 1810 and submitted to the states for ratification. By early 1812, eleven states had ratified the amendment. However, it required ratification by thirteen states to become part of the Constitution. On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811), New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it. The amendment would have stripped United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power". It was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland and passed by Congress on May 1, 1810. The amendment was intended to prevent U.S. citizens from accepting titles of nobility from foreign powers, reflecting concerns about European influence on the young republic. The amendment's text states: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Despite claims by some individuals known as "Thirteenthers" that the amendment was actually ratified and became part of the Constitution, official records and communications from the U.S. government confirm that it did achieve the necessary ratifications to become law. In 1789 Senator Tristrain Dalton (MA) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for ANY American accepting a "title of nobility" (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn't passed, this was the first time a "title of nobility" amendment was proposed. 1810 - 1810 - twenty years after the original suggestion of an Amendment referring to "title of Nobility", Senator Reed proposed another "Title of Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Understanding the reasoning behind the Original 13th Amendment is very important. Even in the 1700 & 1800's, most of our federally elected representatives and senators were lawyers by profession. It is true, the principle intent of the Original 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in the government. When first reading the Original 13th Amendment, with its references to "nobility", "honour", "emperor", "king" would lead most to dismiss the amendment as a petty document carrying no weight. In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment. The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by 12: 1. Maryland (December 25, 1810) 2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811) 3. Ohio (January 31, 1811) 4. Delaware (February 2, 1811) 5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811) 6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811) 7. Vermont (October 24, 1811) 8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811) 9. Georgia (November 22, 1811) 10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811) 11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812) 12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812) 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/original-13th-amendment1.html http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf The Move to 'Restore' the 13th Amendment. If there is an aspect of the human condition that is unaddressed by the platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, adopted last month at the state convention in Des Moines, you'd have to look awfully hard to find it. Its 387 enumerated planks and principles range widely over politics, culture, and economics, from sweeping statements of belief ("America is good") to the fine nuances of agricultural policy ("We support the definition of manure as natural fertilizer") and touching on the mythical "North American Union" (against) and the gold standard (for). Even so, it's a little startling to come upon section 7.19, which calls for "the reintroduction and ratification of the original 13th Amendment, not the 13th amendment in today's Constitution." Since the existing 13th Amendment bans slavery, while the "original" one was about something else entirely, the wording might give the impression that Iowa Republicans wish to reverse emancipation, which is not at all the case, according to state GOP Communications Director Danielle Plogmann. Like many aspects of Republican politics this year, it's actually about embarrassing President Obama. But you have to wonder whether the delegates knew what they were getting into. In making common cause with "Thirteenthers," as those who seek to restore the long-lost amendment are known, the party has ventured beyond the far fringes of conspiracy theory, into a mysterious lost land without lawyers or taxes. Maybe they knew what they were doing after all. This clause reads: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." http://www.thirdamendment.com/8SCIDLJ577.pdf It was an extension of Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which doesn’t allow a public office holder to receive a foreign title or similar honors without the consent of Congress. Today, the idea of a constitutional controversy about the royals may seem kind of silly, but in 1812, the United States was fighting the British and had a rocky relationship with France. The fear of both nations using noble titles as bribes, along with pensions from a foreign government, was persistent. And both the Senate and the House easily passed the TONA and passed it on to the states. By late 1812, a total of 12 states had approved the 13th Amendment and ironically, it needed a 13th state to become ratified. As the War of 1812 escalated, the TONA faded away as an issue and was never ratified. The Missing Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Since the ratification of the Constitution, thousands of constitutional amendments have been proposed, but only 27 have survived the process of Article V. Out of these, the most well known are the first 10, also known as the Bill of Rights. Interestingly, 12 amendments were originally proposed, including one on congressional compensation. This proposal later became our 27th amendment, which celebrates its 20th anniversary today. This amendment boasts the longest ratification process of any amendment—200 years! Under the Compensation Clause, Congress has the power to control its own salary. The Anti-Federalists and others at the state-ratifying conventions rightly objected to the danger of allowing this power. In response, James Madison proposed a compensation amendment stating that pay increases would apply only to the next Congress. It read: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.” This change allowed the voters to force Congress to justify their pay increases through an election. Both the House and Senate approved the proposal and sent it (along with 11 other proposed amendments) to the states. The states ratified only 10 of these, now known as the Bill of Rights, but the compensation amendment remained in limbo until the 1980s. In the early 1980s, a Texas undergraduate student’s term paper renewed the ratification effort. Arguing that the amendment’s ratification was still pending, the student raised support across the country on the amendment’s behalf. At the beginning of his campaign, only seven states had ratified the amendment, but thanks to his efforts, Michigan became the final 38th state to ratify the amendment in 1992. Not only do his efforts illustrate how one citizen can make a difference in the political process, but it also ensures that Congress remains accountable to the people. https://www.newsweek.com/move-restore-13th-amendment-74391 Below Are Some The Most Important Video's The True American History You’ll Ever Watch Today In 2025. P.S. Please Remember The Federal Reserve operates out of London and is a privately held corporation. Just as the District of Columbia, U.S.,Inc. is a foreign corporation not to be confused with the United States of America, Inc. or the united States republic or the Republic of the United States or the UNITED STATES, INC. It’s very confusing but Dunn and Bradstreet has it all. Or the SEC has allot of info. too. America's True Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.1 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6i5jxp-americas-true-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.1-babylon.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.2 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6i7pkp-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.2-be.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.3 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6iaapm-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.3-betrayal-fro.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.4 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6iccwv-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.4-babylonian-s.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.5 The Sovereign Citizens - https://rumble.com/v6idcn4-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.5-th.html Yes We The People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed America's Shocking True Secret Political History And As A Great American You Are The Real Sovereign Citizens Of U.S.A. Right Now America's Shocking Secret Political History. https://dn720005.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-great-american-adventure_202203/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2024 People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/playlists/ahtzhGqa5vE We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/v2ef8n2-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-and-international-maritime-admi.html As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html It was February 21, 1871 that the 41st US Congress sold out the Republic. On this date, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." Also known as the "Act of 1871." Congress, illegally acting on it's own behalf, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. Congress realizing that our country was in severe financial difficulty, cut a deal with the international bankers, in the process incurring a debt to those bankers. The international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city. The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated. The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the 1871 Organic Act. People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. THIS VIDEO IS SAFE TO WATCH but do not click or link To (( anticorruptionsociety )) Talked About In This Video At All... The U.S.A. Government Add A Computer Virus - Your Computer Has Been Locked - To Source Documents In This Video To Stop You! Thanks From The New World Order ! How Can We Stop or Start To Build An Anti Corruption Society ? A society is built on a structure that must have certain principles to stand firm and strong on the grounds of culture, ethics, and morality. In terms of the mentioned aspects, corruption is undoubtedly one evil that should be eliminated from a thriving society. Moreover, corruption is a factor in the system and exists in all cultures, but this phenomenon has only begun to be seriously discussed in the last 20 years. Several heavily pro-corruption reforms and initiatives have indeed been proclaimed effective, but still, no state so far has managed to control corruption through global support requirements. What is Corruption and Where Does it Exist ? Basically, corruption is the misuse of privileged status in any of the departments of government (judicial, executive and legislative) or in governmental or other organizations for the purpose of acquiring personal benefits that are not flagrantly unconstitutional for themselves or else. The culture of corruption, however, is in stark contradiction to the earliest stages of law-making as well as the state and had been regarded as immoral in the ancient times, negatively impacting the public institutions and the flourishing of the political structure. Oath Of Allegiance For New People's Republic Of United State Of America Act Today. - "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Arm Forces of the United States when required by law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." From: How to become a U S citizen by Sally Schreudin 5th Ed. (For what should be in an oath, read 8 U.S.C.A. §1448.) This is the oath that people take to become US citizens, the underlined clause is interesting, sounds like voluntary servitude. This gives a guide as to what has to be in an oath, the rejection of former allegiances with the pledge of fidelity to the nation of choice. No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government Today & Link To Top Info Wars Video's - https://rumble.com/v4w7sxh-no-oaths-of-office-in-the-federal-government-today-and-link-to-top-info-war.html No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government And Are Enemies Destroying US Government From Within As Planned On January 10th Of 1963, Forty Five Current Communist Goals Were Submitted To The Congressional Record. Number Thirteen Was, “Do Away With Loyalty Oaths.” Know One In U.S. Government Have Signed And Or Notarized Copy Or Certified Copy Of Their Oath Of Office For Over 60 Years Now. The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Any information you provide to the Republic for the United States of America is kept strictly private, unless you have given express written permission for any of those details to be made public. Contact details are used to keep you updated by email or other electronic message. If you provide a phone number or mailing address it may be distributed to a contact in your State for purposes of keeping you informed of local assemblies or a personal contact to answer any questions you may have about assisting with the restoration of the republic. Your information is never rented or sold or otherwise released for any purpose. Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick. - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... Sept. 9/11 Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers World Trade Center - https://rumble.com/v3gu5z4-sept.-911-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-towers-world-trade-cen.html https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001. This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? - https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical - https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition - https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now - https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html CIA Mind Control and CIA Secret Experiments use of biological and chemical materials. - https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html AOC Celebrate Restarting MK-Ultra Program With Progress Psychedelics Treatment. - https://rumble.com/v3045j8-aoc-celebrate-restarting-mk-ultra-program-with-progress-psychedelics-treatm.html The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). New World Order National Anthem The Ostrich Lyrics By Steppenwolf 1968 A.C.E. ! - https://rumble.com/v3yl8xx-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell A notarized copy of a document is a certified copy of the original document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public. The notary public will typically stamp the copy with their seal and signature, indicating that they have verified the authenticity of the document and the identity of the person signing it. In some cases, a notarized copy may be acceptable as evidence in court or for official purposes, but it’s always best to check with the relevant authorities or institution to confirm their specific requirements. It’s also important to note that a notarized copy is not the same as a signed copy. A signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it, but it has not been verified or authenticated by a notary public. In summary, a notarized copy is a certified copy of a document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public, while a signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. We Hope This Video Is The Great Awakening In 2025 Of The American People And Is A Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2025.

We The True People's Of U.S.A. "Open Your Eye Before You Die" America's True Shocking Secret Political History. Great American Adventure The Secret Systems Of Control Used By The Ancient Royal Bloodlines And The Globalist Ruling Elite And How Everything Prepared The Way For The Coming New World Order. This Is One Most Influential Books Ever Written Today. We At This Channel Hope You Enjoy This True Five Part Video Series. The True America's Secret History 1776 Thru 2024 Today. Since the founding of our Country, the 'Elite' (and their Robber Baron Partners) have fabricated our history, taken control of our economy and altered our form of Government and our Legal System. The Judge describes the people and events responsible for America's current state of deterioration. "The Illuminati are hell bent upon making Bible Prophecy come true and are responsible for much of the Biblical like devastation that has been occurring around the Earth." We won't be able to stop them or even protect ourselves unless we understand their modus operandi. The United States of America is Not a Nation, or Country. (It Is A Corporation) It Has No Laws, Only Corporate Statutes. Every Government Agency is Not Part of the Federal Government, but is Owned by the United Nations. The UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. Go to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Judge Dale describes the rise of the Babylonian Slave Driving System and the Babylonian Money Magic Khazarian - Sabbatean Banking System that was Created by Hammarabi. This is the Basis of our Modern System of International Commerce that is Ruled through Admiralty Law. Our Founding Fathers were Not who or what you think they were. Our History is Not what you think it is. We were completely Betrayed by our Politicians, both past and present. Jude Dale presents the most shocking and amazing secrets of America's True Political History. This turns out entire history upside down. Very much of this information is So Shocking, that it may be extremely hard to believe or accept. If you hear something that offends you, or is too hard for you to believe, continue listening. This is packed with hard core facts, most of which you are not likely to learn elsewhere. I hope you appreciate my efforts in sharing this with you. It took me 5 part video's attempts before I could record it properly. I spent all day. The Double Dealing of Washington. The Tyranny of Lincoln. The Reconstruction Act. The War Powers Act. The 13th Amendment Barred Layers. All Lawyers Swear Loyalty to the Crown. Enslavement Through Corporations. The High Treason of FDR. Citizens Declared Enemies of the State. Straw Man Corporate Fiction. You Are Owned By The State. You Are A Traded Commodity. The Khazarian Federal Reserve. You Don't Own Your Own Land. Why You Must Get License's. You And Your Children Are Wards of the Court. You Were Tricked Into Paying The National Debt. The 21 Points of Manifesto of the New World Order and Plan to Control and Enslave the World by July 4th 2026 on this the day of Old America’s up coming 250nd year of independence. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf Inscriptions: A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. The languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the two major political parties in the United States. The main differences between them lie in their ideologies, policies, and values. Democratic Party: Generally considered liberal, the Democratic Party typically supports a larger government role in economic issues, backing regulations and social welfare programs. They favor a progressive tax to finance the government’s expanded role and often endorse funding social programs through taxation. Democrats also tend to support environmental protection, gun control, less-strict immigration laws, and worker rights. Republican Party: Seen as conservative, the Republican Party typically wants a smaller government that is less involved in the economy. They support lower taxes for all and an economy with fewer government regulations and fewer government-funded social programs. Republicans also tend to desire a strong national defense and the aggressive pursuit of U.S. national security interests, often supporting states’ rights against the power of the federal government. Key issues where Democrats and Republicans differ include abortion, with Democrats generally arguing for women’s access to abortion and Republicans having more varied opinions ranging from wanting more restrictions to total bans. Additionally, the parties have differing views on the role of government in society, with Democrats believing it’s the government’s job to make society fairer and Republicans advocating for less government influence over people’s lives. It’s worth noting that while these general trends hold, individual members of each party may have diverse views, and the parties’ positions can evolve over time. Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts Anyway! Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply. The Inheritance Tax. Accounts Receivable Tax. Airline Surcharge Tax. Airline Fuel Tax. Airport Maintenance Tax. Bridge Crossing Tax or Toll Tax. Building Permit Tax. Cat License Tax. Cigarette Tax. Corporate Income Tax. Death Tax. Dog License Tax. Driving Permit Tax. Environmental Tax (Fee). Excise Taxes. Federal Income Tax. Federal Unemployment (UI). Fishing License Tax. Food License Tax. Gasoline Tax. Gross Receipts Tax. Health Tax. Hunting License Tax. Hydro Tax. Inheritance Tax. Interest Tax. Liquor Tax. Luxury Taxes. Marriage License Tax. Medicare Tax. Mortgage Tax. Parking Meter Tax. Personal Income Tax. Property Tax. Poverty Tax. Prescription Drug Tax. Provincial Income And Sales Tax. Real Estate Tax. Recreational Vehicle Tax. Retail Sales Tax. Service Charge Tax. School Tax. Sin Tax. State Park Service Tax. Telephone Federal Tax. Telephone Federal, Provincial and Local Surcharge Taxes. Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax. Vehicle License Registration Tax. Vehicle Sales Tax. Water Tax. Watercraft Registration Tax. Well Permit Tax. Workers Compensation Tax. U.S. National Parks Service Tax. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. So Again You Think This Funny In 2025 ? Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Meet Your Strawman ? Your Birth Certificate Is Worth Millions ? Swindled by U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dmnio-meet-your-strawman-your-birth-certificate-is-worth-millions-swindled-by-u.s.html The story of how everyone has a strawman or strawwoman or strawtransgene so i hope everyone is happy now. it's created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative animation made in the spirit of freedom. Meet your ‘strawman and woman’ – the fake ‘you’ the government creates in your name to control you and how you can stop it. How you can lawfully disconnect yourself, your family and your business from governments and the institutions of law enforcement and no longer comply with ‘Covid’19/21/24 fascism. so talks with your common law expert. A must-watch for those who choose freedom and want to end this madness. We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights - https://rumble.com/v2d7y7w-we-the-sheeple-people-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-a-real-bill-of-st.html The Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. Welcome People's Republic Of U.S.A. Gangs-Riots-Looting-Protests Propaganda Etc.. - https://rumble.com/v2yxck6-welcome-peoples-republic-of-u.s.a.-gangs-riots-looting-protests-propaganda-.html We Our Smartest People In The World Today Felons, Illegals And MS13 Other Gangs Riots Looting Protests Propaganda Sign. Welcome Sign Reads "Official Sanctuary State" Sign At California Border and Other Sanctuary States in U.S.A. https://bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_16.htm Welcome To Our Channel In 2025 Thank You For Watching Our Channel (What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?) Yes We All The True People Of The U.S.A. Want To Welcome You To The New World Order In The Year Zero. The Real True Origin of the World Today and The New National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. A symbolic example of this secret truth is contained within the National Bird of the United States. Many Americans and people around the world think that our National Bird of the U.S. is an eagle. They are wrong. The symbolic bird you will find on the Great Seal of the United States is actually the mythical bird known as a Phoenix. The scroll in the beak of the Phoenix is the Latin motto of 13 letters, E Pluribus Unum, meaning in English, ” Out of Many, One”. Later an olive branch and a bundle of 13 arrows (representing peace and war, respectively) were included in the claws of the phoenix. Over its head there appears 13 stars that are arranged in rows of 1-4-3-4-1, forming a six-pointed star. The Star of David and symbol of Israel. Your Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws Work And What Is And Why Is U.S.A. Laws Are Under A Gold Fringe Flag? So have you ever walked into a court room and notice a gold fringe flag hanging in the room? Did you ever wonder why every single flag in court rooms and government buildings is a gold fringe flag? And do you remember how many times you pledged your allegiance to that flag? “I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.” Reciting the pledge was the first things we did in school every day, from day one of first grade, to the last day of eighth grade. So, after eight years of repetition, the neuro-pathways are grooved in deep into our brains. And our loyalty so strong to the red, white and blue. Then, one day, we wake up in our adult world, and guess what? The flag now has gold fringe around it and we NEVER asked why? Why is this flag different than the one we were taught to love and be loyal to? We never questioned it. We just assumed it was the same, dear old stripes and stars, and went about out busy little lives. So, the flag in the court room is a gold fringe flag. Who cares? That doesn’t affect me, right? You should care and yes, it does affect you. The gold fringe flag is a clear sign of a system being in place that is not the system we are taught to believe is in place. A gold fringe flag was historically used during times of war in maritime admiralty law(which we are in right now as well). The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. Also, you will notice the tassels hanging from the flag. These are also symbolic of admiralty law, which is the law of the sea. So, wait a minute? Our flags that hang in our government buildings and court rooms are actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law?? Yes. We are in fact, functioning in maritime admiralty law, and our court system is actually upholding a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America. Well, actually, the UNITED STATES does have a constitution but it is not the same as the original Constitution that was drafted for the republic. This is why the gold fringed flag controversy is such a big deal, because it symbolize. So, now it is up to us to figure out how to navigate our way through the law of the sea, in order to find our remedies. The possibilities for this are endless. But it basically boils down to either mastering the current system and learning how to navigate your way through it, without incurring personal liability for anything. Or, separating yourself completely from the system, and moving yourself back to common law. In other words, you can go as far as expatriating yourself from the UNITED STATES so that you no longer belong to that corporation. Therefore, their rules would no longer apply to you. Cool, huh? What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. This Channel Is Up For 666 Day Now And Rumble Said We Have Made In Ad Money A Total Of $682 Dollars As Of Nov. 12, 2024 So Our Ave. Money Is $1.02 Cents A Day. Yes This Channel Is Not About Making Money At ALL. Thank You Everyone For Over 5 Million+ Views And For Watching All Of Our 872 Video's In 2022 - 2024. We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. All religion is a tool to have more control over the people's thoughts and behavior. Now religion is basically a pyramid scheme making the few at the top rich. Why does a church need a 15 million dollar compound with multiple buildings? Why does the pastor usually drive a nice new mercedes or BMW while the flock struggles and still gives the church money every week? Don't people join the church to change their life and help others the same way? It's like politicians, they should almost be volunteer jobs or just low paying. Otherwise you just keep getting people who want more money regardless of how they get it. Take from the poor and keep it doesn't sound like caring for the people. For the most part big churches were corrupted centuries ago with power hungry people. Now it's greed, a larger flock or church means they get more money every week!! The only way to attack illegal activity is to focus on the illegal activity and its perpetrators, former President Reagan argued in a 1983 speech. “You won’t get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There’s only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don’t actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time,” he said. all gun laws are unconstitutional therefore illegal and void. no government official anywhere in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to pass or enforce any form of gun laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America under the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment shall not be Infringed clause, 9th amendment enumeration clause, 10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause, 14th amendment section 1 no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause combined anyone passing or enforcing any form of gun laws anywhere in the united states of America are guilty of felony crimes in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section §241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section §242, if they are working with or on behalf of any anti Gun organizations, association, movement, group they are guilty in violation of Title 5 U.S.C. section §7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5), they are guilty of Perjury in violating oath of office swearing false oath, insurrection and rebellion against the constitution of the united states of America, and Treason. Yes that's what our second amendment exists for to take down terrorist tyrant traitors calling themselves government. "You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan The natural right to keep & bear arms protects all of our other natural rights. Two of the very few reasons government exists is to protect the country and protect the natural rights of its citizens. However, the government, fed and state, have abandoned their purpose and have made themselves the enemy of America and Americans. They not only fail to protect our rights, they steal our wealth to spend Attacking our natural rights and trying to replace them with socialist welfare & subsidies like murdering babies & state-mismanaged death care. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2025. Titles Of Nobility Amendment To 'Restore' legitimate 13th Amendment To The U.S. Constitution - https://rumble.com/v6hk6od-titles-of-nobility-amendment-to-restore-legitimate-13th-amendment-to-the-u..html True Titles Of Nobility Our early legislators were so concerned regarding the "still" close relationship with the British Crown hence Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which is included in the Constitution. The Titles of Nobility Amendment was proposed in 1810 and submitted to the states for ratification. By early 1812, eleven states had ratified the amendment. However, it required ratification by thirteen states to become part of the Constitution. On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811), New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it. The amendment would have stripped United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power". It was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland and passed by Congress on May 1, 1810. The amendment was intended to prevent U.S. citizens from accepting titles of nobility from foreign powers, reflecting concerns about European influence on the young republic. The amendment's text states: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Despite claims by some individuals known as "Thirteenthers" that the amendment was actually ratified and became part of the Constitution, official records and communications from the U.S. government confirm that it did achieve the necessary ratifications to become law. In 1789 Senator Tristrain Dalton (MA) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for ANY American accepting a "title of nobility" (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn't passed, this was the first time a "title of nobility" amendment was proposed. 1810 - 1810 - twenty years after the original suggestion of an Amendment referring to "title of Nobility", Senator Reed proposed another "Title of Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Understanding the reasoning behind the Original 13th Amendment is very important. Even in the 1700 & 1800's, most of our federally elected representatives and senators were lawyers by profession. It is true, the principle intent of the Original 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in the government. When first reading the Original 13th Amendment, with its references to "nobility", "honour", "emperor", "king" would lead most to dismiss the amendment as a petty document carrying no weight. In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment. The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by 12: 1. Maryland (December 25, 1810) 2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811) 3. Ohio (January 31, 1811) 4. Delaware (February 2, 1811) 5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811) 6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811) 7. Vermont (October 24, 1811) 8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811) 9. Georgia (November 22, 1811) 10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811) 11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812) 12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812) 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/original-13th-amendment1.html http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf The Move to 'Restore' the 13th Amendment. If there is an aspect of the human condition that is unaddressed by the platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, adopted last month at the state convention in Des Moines, you'd have to look awfully hard to find it. Its 387 enumerated planks and principles range widely over politics, culture, and economics, from sweeping statements of belief ("America is good") to the fine nuances of agricultural policy ("We support the definition of manure as natural fertilizer") and touching on the mythical "North American Union" (against) and the gold standard (for). Even so, it's a little startling to come upon section 7.19, which calls for "the reintroduction and ratification of the original 13th Amendment, not the 13th amendment in today's Constitution." Since the existing 13th Amendment bans slavery, while the "original" one was about something else entirely, the wording might give the impression that Iowa Republicans wish to reverse emancipation, which is not at all the case, according to state GOP Communications Director Danielle Plogmann. Like many aspects of Republican politics this year, it's actually about embarrassing President Obama. But you have to wonder whether the delegates knew what they were getting into. In making common cause with "Thirteenthers," as those who seek to restore the long-lost amendment are known, the party has ventured beyond the far fringes of conspiracy theory, into a mysterious lost land without lawyers or taxes. Maybe they knew what they were doing after all. This clause reads: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." http://www.thirdamendment.com/8SCIDLJ577.pdf It was an extension of Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which doesn’t allow a public office holder to receive a foreign title or similar honors without the consent of Congress. Today, the idea of a constitutional controversy about the royals may seem kind of silly, but in 1812, the United States was fighting the British and had a rocky relationship with France. The fear of both nations using noble titles as bribes, along with pensions from a foreign government, was persistent. And both the Senate and the House easily passed the TONA and passed it on to the states. By late 1812, a total of 12 states had approved the 13th Amendment and ironically, it needed a 13th state to become ratified. As the War of 1812 escalated, the TONA faded away as an issue and was never ratified. The Missing Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Since the ratification of the Constitution, thousands of constitutional amendments have been proposed, but only 27 have survived the process of Article V. Out of these, the most well known are the first 10, also known as the Bill of Rights. Interestingly, 12 amendments were originally proposed, including one on congressional compensation. This proposal later became our 27th amendment, which celebrates its 20th anniversary today. This amendment boasts the longest ratification process of any amendment—200 years! Under the Compensation Clause, Congress has the power to control its own salary. The Anti-Federalists and others at the state-ratifying conventions rightly objected to the danger of allowing this power. In response, James Madison proposed a compensation amendment stating that pay increases would apply only to the next Congress. It read: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.” This change allowed the voters to force Congress to justify their pay increases through an election. Both the House and Senate approved the proposal and sent it (along with 11 other proposed amendments) to the states. The states ratified only 10 of these, now known as the Bill of Rights, but the compensation amendment remained in limbo until the 1980s. In the early 1980s, a Texas undergraduate student’s term paper renewed the ratification effort. Arguing that the amendment’s ratification was still pending, the student raised support across the country on the amendment’s behalf. At the beginning of his campaign, only seven states had ratified the amendment, but thanks to his efforts, Michigan became the final 38th state to ratify the amendment in 1992. Not only do his efforts illustrate how one citizen can make a difference in the political process, but it also ensures that Congress remains accountable to the people. https://www.newsweek.com/move-restore-13th-amendment-74391 Below Are Some The Most Important Video's The True American History You’ll Ever Watch Today In 2025. P.S. Please Remember The Federal Reserve operates out of London and is a privately held corporation. Just as the District of Columbia, U.S.,Inc. is a foreign corporation not to be confused with the United States of America, Inc. or the united States republic or the Republic of the United States or the UNITED STATES, INC. It’s very confusing but Dunn and Bradstreet has it all. Or the SEC has allot of info. too. America's True Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.1 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6i5jxp-americas-true-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.1-babylon.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.2 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6i7pkp-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.2-be.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.3 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6iaapm-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.3-betrayal-fro.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.4 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6iccwv-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.4-babylonian-s.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.5 The Sovereign Citizens - https://rumble.com/v6idcn4-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.5-th.html Yes We The People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed America's Shocking True Secret Political History And As A Great American You Are The Real Sovereign Citizens Of U.S.A. Right Now America's Shocking Secret Political History. https://dn720005.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-great-american-adventure_202203/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2024 People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/playlists/ahtzhGqa5vE We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/v2ef8n2-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-and-international-maritime-admi.html As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html It was February 21, 1871 that the 41st US Congress sold out the Republic. On this date, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." Also known as the "Act of 1871." Congress, illegally acting on it's own behalf, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. Congress realizing that our country was in severe financial difficulty, cut a deal with the international bankers, in the process incurring a debt to those bankers. The international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city. The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated. The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the 1871 Organic Act. People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. THIS VIDEO IS SAFE TO WATCH but do not click or link To (( anticorruptionsociety )) Talked About In This Video At All... The U.S.A. Government Add A Computer Virus - Your Computer Has Been Locked - To Source Documents In This Video To Stop You! Thanks From The New World Order ! How Can We Stop or Start To Build An Anti Corruption Society ? A society is built on a structure that must have certain principles to stand firm and strong on the grounds of culture, ethics, and morality. In terms of the mentioned aspects, corruption is undoubtedly one evil that should be eliminated from a thriving society. Moreover, corruption is a factor in the system and exists in all cultures, but this phenomenon has only begun to be seriously discussed in the last 20 years. Several heavily pro-corruption reforms and initiatives have indeed been proclaimed effective, but still, no state so far has managed to control corruption through global support requirements. What is Corruption and Where Does it Exist ? Basically, corruption is the misuse of privileged status in any of the departments of government (judicial, executive and legislative) or in governmental or other organizations for the purpose of acquiring personal benefits that are not flagrantly unconstitutional for themselves or else. The culture of corruption, however, is in stark contradiction to the earliest stages of law-making as well as the state and had been regarded as immoral in the ancient times, negatively impacting the public institutions and the flourishing of the political structure. Oath Of Allegiance For New People's Republic Of United State Of America Act Today. - "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Arm Forces of the United States when required by law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." From: How to become a U S citizen by Sally Schreudin 5th Ed. (For what should be in an oath, read 8 U.S.C.A. §1448.) This is the oath that people take to become US citizens, the underlined clause is interesting, sounds like voluntary servitude. This gives a guide as to what has to be in an oath, the rejection of former allegiances with the pledge of fidelity to the nation of choice. No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government Today & Link To Top Info Wars Video's - https://rumble.com/v4w7sxh-no-oaths-of-office-in-the-federal-government-today-and-link-to-top-info-war.html No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government And Are Enemies Destroying US Government From Within As Planned On January 10th Of 1963, Forty Five Current Communist Goals Were Submitted To The Congressional Record. Number Thirteen Was, “Do Away With Loyalty Oaths.” Know One In U.S. Government Have Signed And Or Notarized Copy Or Certified Copy Of Their Oath Of Office For Over 60 Years Now. The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Any information you provide to the Republic for the United States of America is kept strictly private, unless you have given express written permission for any of those details to be made public. Contact details are used to keep you updated by email or other electronic message. If you provide a phone number or mailing address it may be distributed to a contact in your State for purposes of keeping you informed of local assemblies or a personal contact to answer any questions you may have about assisting with the restoration of the republic. Your information is never rented or sold or otherwise released for any purpose. Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick. - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... Sept. 9/11 Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers World Trade Center - https://rumble.com/v3gu5z4-sept.-911-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-towers-world-trade-cen.html https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001. This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? - https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical - https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition - https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now - https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html CIA Mind Control and CIA Secret Experiments use of biological and chemical materials. - https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html AOC Celebrate Restarting MK-Ultra Program With Progress Psychedelics Treatment. - https://rumble.com/v3045j8-aoc-celebrate-restarting-mk-ultra-program-with-progress-psychedelics-treatm.html The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). New World Order National Anthem The Ostrich Lyrics By Steppenwolf 1968 A.C.E. ! - https://rumble.com/v3yl8xx-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell A notarized copy of a document is a certified copy of the original document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public. The notary public will typically stamp the copy with their seal and signature, indicating that they have verified the authenticity of the document and the identity of the person signing it. In some cases, a notarized copy may be acceptable as evidence in court or for official purposes, but it’s always best to check with the relevant authorities or institution to confirm their specific requirements. It’s also important to note that a notarized copy is not the same as a signed copy. A signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it, but it has not been verified or authenticated by a notary public. In summary, a notarized copy is a certified copy of a document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public, while a signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. We Hope This Video Is The Great Awakening In 2025 Of The American People And Is A Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2025.

We The True People's Of U.S.A. "Open Your Eye Before You Die" America's True Shocking Secret Political History. Great American Adventure The Secret Systems Of Control Used By The Ancient Royal Bloodlines And The Globalist Ruling Elite And How Everything Prepared The Way For The Coming New World Order. This Is One Most Influential Books Ever Written Today. We At This Channel Hope You Enjoy This True Five Part Video Series. The True America's Secret History 1776 Thru 2024 Today. Since the founding of our Country, the 'Elite' (and their Robber Baron Partners) have fabricated our history, taken control of our economy and altered our form of Government and our Legal System. The Judge describes the people and events responsible for America's current state of deterioration. "The Illuminati are hell bent upon making Bible Prophecy come true and are responsible for much of the Biblical like devastation that has been occurring around the Earth." We won't be able to stop them or even protect ourselves unless we understand their modus operandi. The United States of America is Not a Nation, or Country. (It Is A Corporation) It Has No Laws, Only Corporate Statutes. Every Government Agency is Not Part of the Federal Government, but is Owned by the United Nations. The UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. Go to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Judge Dale describes the rise of the Babylonian Slave Driving System and the Babylonian Money Magic Khazarian - Sabbatean Banking System that was Created by Hammarabi. This is the Basis of our Modern System of International Commerce that is Ruled through Admiralty Law. Our Founding Fathers were Not who or what you think they were. Our History is Not what you think it is. We were completely Betrayed by our Politicians, both past and present. Jude Dale presents the most shocking and amazing secrets of America's True Political History. This turns out entire history upside down. Very much of this information is So Shocking, that it may be extremely hard to believe or accept. If you hear something that offends you, or is too hard for you to believe, continue listening. This is packed with hard core facts, most of which you are not likely to learn elsewhere. I hope you appreciate my efforts in sharing this with you. It took me 5 part video's attempts before I could record it properly. I spent all day. The Double Dealing of Washington. The Tyranny of Lincoln. The Reconstruction Act. The War Powers Act. The 13th Amendment Barred Layers. All Lawyers Swear Loyalty to the Crown. Enslavement Through Corporations. The High Treason of FDR. Citizens Declared Enemies of the State. Straw Man Corporate Fiction. You Are Owned By The State. You Are A Traded Commodity. The Khazarian Federal Reserve. You Don't Own Your Own Land. Why You Must Get License's. You And Your Children Are Wards of the Court. You Were Tricked Into Paying The National Debt. The 21 Points of Manifesto of the New World Order and Plan to Control and Enslave the World by July 4th 2026 on this the day of Old America’s up coming 250nd year of independence. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf Inscriptions: A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. The languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the two major political parties in the United States. The main differences between them lie in their ideologies, policies, and values. Democratic Party: Generally considered liberal, the Democratic Party typically supports a larger government role in economic issues, backing regulations and social welfare programs. They favor a progressive tax to finance the government’s expanded role and often endorse funding social programs through taxation. Democrats also tend to support environmental protection, gun control, less-strict immigration laws, and worker rights. Republican Party: Seen as conservative, the Republican Party typically wants a smaller government that is less involved in the economy. They support lower taxes for all and an economy with fewer government regulations and fewer government-funded social programs. Republicans also tend to desire a strong national defense and the aggressive pursuit of U.S. national security interests, often supporting states’ rights against the power of the federal government. Key issues where Democrats and Republicans differ include abortion, with Democrats generally arguing for women’s access to abortion and Republicans having more varied opinions ranging from wanting more restrictions to total bans. Additionally, the parties have differing views on the role of government in society, with Democrats believing it’s the government’s job to make society fairer and Republicans advocating for less government influence over people’s lives. It’s worth noting that while these general trends hold, individual members of each party may have diverse views, and the parties’ positions can evolve over time. Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts Anyway! Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply. The Inheritance Tax. Accounts Receivable Tax. Airline Surcharge Tax. Airline Fuel Tax. Airport Maintenance Tax. Bridge Crossing Tax or Toll Tax. Building Permit Tax. Cat License Tax. Cigarette Tax. Corporate Income Tax. Death Tax. Dog License Tax. Driving Permit Tax. Environmental Tax (Fee). Excise Taxes. Federal Income Tax. Federal Unemployment (UI). Fishing License Tax. Food License Tax. Gasoline Tax. Gross Receipts Tax. Health Tax. Hunting License Tax. Hydro Tax. Inheritance Tax. Interest Tax. Liquor Tax. Luxury Taxes. Marriage License Tax. Medicare Tax. Mortgage Tax. Parking Meter Tax. Personal Income Tax. Property Tax. Poverty Tax. Prescription Drug Tax. Provincial Income And Sales Tax. Real Estate Tax. Recreational Vehicle Tax. Retail Sales Tax. Service Charge Tax. School Tax. Sin Tax. State Park Service Tax. Telephone Federal Tax. Telephone Federal, Provincial and Local Surcharge Taxes. Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax. Vehicle License Registration Tax. Vehicle Sales Tax. Water Tax. Watercraft Registration Tax. Well Permit Tax. Workers Compensation Tax. U.S. National Parks Service Tax. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. So Again You Think This Funny In 2025 ? Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Meet Your Strawman ? Your Birth Certificate Is Worth Millions ? Swindled by U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dmnio-meet-your-strawman-your-birth-certificate-is-worth-millions-swindled-by-u.s.html The story of how everyone has a strawman or strawwoman or strawtransgene so i hope everyone is happy now. it's created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative animation made in the spirit of freedom. Meet your ‘strawman and woman’ – the fake ‘you’ the government creates in your name to control you and how you can stop it. How you can lawfully disconnect yourself, your family and your business from governments and the institutions of law enforcement and no longer comply with ‘Covid’19/21/24 fascism. so talks with your common law expert. A must-watch for those who choose freedom and want to end this madness. We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights - https://rumble.com/v2d7y7w-we-the-sheeple-people-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-a-real-bill-of-st.html The Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. Welcome People's Republic Of U.S.A. Gangs-Riots-Looting-Protests Propaganda Etc.. - https://rumble.com/v2yxck6-welcome-peoples-republic-of-u.s.a.-gangs-riots-looting-protests-propaganda-.html We Our Smartest People In The World Today Felons, Illegals And MS13 Other Gangs Riots Looting Protests Propaganda Sign. Welcome Sign Reads "Official Sanctuary State" Sign At California Border and Other Sanctuary States in U.S.A. https://bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_16.htm Welcome To Our Channel In 2025 Thank You For Watching Our Channel (What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?) Yes We All The True People Of The U.S.A. Want To Welcome You To The New World Order In The Year Zero. The Real True Origin of the World Today and The New National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. A symbolic example of this secret truth is contained within the National Bird of the United States. Many Americans and people around the world think that our National Bird of the U.S. is an eagle. They are wrong. The symbolic bird you will find on the Great Seal of the United States is actually the mythical bird known as a Phoenix. The scroll in the beak of the Phoenix is the Latin motto of 13 letters, E Pluribus Unum, meaning in English, ” Out of Many, One”. Later an olive branch and a bundle of 13 arrows (representing peace and war, respectively) were included in the claws of the phoenix. Over its head there appears 13 stars that are arranged in rows of 1-4-3-4-1, forming a six-pointed star. The Star of David and symbol of Israel. Your Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws Work And What Is And Why Is U.S.A. Laws Are Under A Gold Fringe Flag? So have you ever walked into a court room and notice a gold fringe flag hanging in the room? Did you ever wonder why every single flag in court rooms and government buildings is a gold fringe flag? And do you remember how many times you pledged your allegiance to that flag? “I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.” Reciting the pledge was the first things we did in school every day, from day one of first grade, to the last day of eighth grade. So, after eight years of repetition, the neuro-pathways are grooved in deep into our brains. And our loyalty so strong to the red, white and blue. Then, one day, we wake up in our adult world, and guess what? The flag now has gold fringe around it and we NEVER asked why? Why is this flag different than the one we were taught to love and be loyal to? We never questioned it. We just assumed it was the same, dear old stripes and stars, and went about out busy little lives. So, the flag in the court room is a gold fringe flag. Who cares? That doesn’t affect me, right? You should care and yes, it does affect you. The gold fringe flag is a clear sign of a system being in place that is not the system we are taught to believe is in place. A gold fringe flag was historically used during times of war in maritime admiralty law(which we are in right now as well). The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. Also, you will notice the tassels hanging from the flag. These are also symbolic of admiralty law, which is the law of the sea. So, wait a minute? Our flags that hang in our government buildings and court rooms are actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law?? Yes. We are in fact, functioning in maritime admiralty law, and our court system is actually upholding a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America. Well, actually, the UNITED STATES does have a constitution but it is not the same as the original Constitution that was drafted for the republic. This is why the gold fringed flag controversy is such a big deal, because it symbolize. So, now it is up to us to figure out how to navigate our way through the law of the sea, in order to find our remedies. The possibilities for this are endless. But it basically boils down to either mastering the current system and learning how to navigate your way through it, without incurring personal liability for anything. Or, separating yourself completely from the system, and moving yourself back to common law. In other words, you can go as far as expatriating yourself from the UNITED STATES so that you no longer belong to that corporation. Therefore, their rules would no longer apply to you. Cool, huh? What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. This Channel Is Up For 666 Day Now And Rumble Said We Have Made In Ad Money A Total Of $682 Dollars As Of Nov. 12, 2024 So Our Ave. Money Is $1.02 Cents A Day. Yes This Channel Is Not About Making Money At ALL. Thank You Everyone For Over 5 Million+ Views And For Watching All Of Our 872 Video's In 2022 - 2024. We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. All religion is a tool to have more control over the people's thoughts and behavior. Now religion is basically a pyramid scheme making the few at the top rich. Why does a church need a 15 million dollar compound with multiple buildings? Why does the pastor usually drive a nice new mercedes or BMW while the flock struggles and still gives the church money every week? Don't people join the church to change their life and help others the same way? It's like politicians, they should almost be volunteer jobs or just low paying. Otherwise you just keep getting people who want more money regardless of how they get it. Take from the poor and keep it doesn't sound like caring for the people. For the most part big churches were corrupted centuries ago with power hungry people. Now it's greed, a larger flock or church means they get more money every week!! The only way to attack illegal activity is to focus on the illegal activity and its perpetrators, former President Reagan argued in a 1983 speech. “You won’t get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There’s only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don’t actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time,” he said. all gun laws are unconstitutional therefore illegal and void. no government official anywhere in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to pass or enforce any form of gun laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America under the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment shall not be Infringed clause, 9th amendment enumeration clause, 10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause, 14th amendment section 1 no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause combined anyone passing or enforcing any form of gun laws anywhere in the united states of America are guilty of felony crimes in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section §241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section §242, if they are working with or on behalf of any anti Gun organizations, association, movement, group they are guilty in violation of Title 5 U.S.C. section §7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5), they are guilty of Perjury in violating oath of office swearing false oath, insurrection and rebellion against the constitution of the united states of America, and Treason. Yes that's what our second amendment exists for to take down terrorist tyrant traitors calling themselves government. "You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan The natural right to keep & bear arms protects all of our other natural rights. Two of the very few reasons government exists is to protect the country and protect the natural rights of its citizens. However, the government, fed and state, have abandoned their purpose and have made themselves the enemy of America and Americans. They not only fail to protect our rights, they steal our wealth to spend Attacking our natural rights and trying to replace them with socialist welfare & subsidies like murdering babies & state-mismanaged death care. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2025. Titles Of Nobility Amendment To 'Restore' legitimate 13th Amendment To The U.S. Constitution - https://rumble.com/v6hk6od-titles-of-nobility-amendment-to-restore-legitimate-13th-amendment-to-the-u..html True Titles Of Nobility Our early legislators were so concerned regarding the "still" close relationship with the British Crown hence Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which is included in the Constitution. The Titles of Nobility Amendment was proposed in 1810 and submitted to the states for ratification. By early 1812, eleven states had ratified the amendment. However, it required ratification by thirteen states to become part of the Constitution. On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811), New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it. The amendment would have stripped United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power". It was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland and passed by Congress on May 1, 1810. The amendment was intended to prevent U.S. citizens from accepting titles of nobility from foreign powers, reflecting concerns about European influence on the young republic. The amendment's text states: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Despite claims by some individuals known as "Thirteenthers" that the amendment was actually ratified and became part of the Constitution, official records and communications from the U.S. government confirm that it did achieve the necessary ratifications to become law. In 1789 Senator Tristrain Dalton (MA) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for ANY American accepting a "title of nobility" (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn't passed, this was the first time a "title of nobility" amendment was proposed. 1810 - 1810 - twenty years after the original suggestion of an Amendment referring to "title of Nobility", Senator Reed proposed another "Title of Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Understanding the reasoning behind the Original 13th Amendment is very important. Even in the 1700 & 1800's, most of our federally elected representatives and senators were lawyers by profession. It is true, the principle intent of the Original 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in the government. When first reading the Original 13th Amendment, with its references to "nobility", "honour", "emperor", "king" would lead most to dismiss the amendment as a petty document carrying no weight. In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment. The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by 12: 1. Maryland (December 25, 1810) 2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811) 3. Ohio (January 31, 1811) 4. Delaware (February 2, 1811) 5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811) 6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811) 7. Vermont (October 24, 1811) 8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811) 9. Georgia (November 22, 1811) 10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811) 11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812) 12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812) 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/original-13th-amendment1.html http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf The Move to 'Restore' the 13th Amendment. If there is an aspect of the human condition that is unaddressed by the platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, adopted last month at the state convention in Des Moines, you'd have to look awfully hard to find it. Its 387 enumerated planks and principles range widely over politics, culture, and economics, from sweeping statements of belief ("America is good") to the fine nuances of agricultural policy ("We support the definition of manure as natural fertilizer") and touching on the mythical "North American Union" (against) and the gold standard (for). Even so, it's a little startling to come upon section 7.19, which calls for "the reintroduction and ratification of the original 13th Amendment, not the 13th amendment in today's Constitution." Since the existing 13th Amendment bans slavery, while the "original" one was about something else entirely, the wording might give the impression that Iowa Republicans wish to reverse emancipation, which is not at all the case, according to state GOP Communications Director Danielle Plogmann. Like many aspects of Republican politics this year, it's actually about embarrassing President Obama. But you have to wonder whether the delegates knew what they were getting into. In making common cause with "Thirteenthers," as those who seek to restore the long-lost amendment are known, the party has ventured beyond the far fringes of conspiracy theory, into a mysterious lost land without lawyers or taxes. Maybe they knew what they were doing after all. This clause reads: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." http://www.thirdamendment.com/8SCIDLJ577.pdf It was an extension of Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which doesn’t allow a public office holder to receive a foreign title or similar honors without the consent of Congress. Today, the idea of a constitutional controversy about the royals may seem kind of silly, but in 1812, the United States was fighting the British and had a rocky relationship with France. The fear of both nations using noble titles as bribes, along with pensions from a foreign government, was persistent. And both the Senate and the House easily passed the TONA and passed it on to the states. By late 1812, a total of 12 states had approved the 13th Amendment and ironically, it needed a 13th state to become ratified. As the War of 1812 escalated, the TONA faded away as an issue and was never ratified. The Missing Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Since the ratification of the Constitution, thousands of constitutional amendments have been proposed, but only 27 have survived the process of Article V. Out of these, the most well known are the first 10, also known as the Bill of Rights. Interestingly, 12 amendments were originally proposed, including one on congressional compensation. This proposal later became our 27th amendment, which celebrates its 20th anniversary today. This amendment boasts the longest ratification process of any amendment—200 years! Under the Compensation Clause, Congress has the power to control its own salary. The Anti-Federalists and others at the state-ratifying conventions rightly objected to the danger of allowing this power. In response, James Madison proposed a compensation amendment stating that pay increases would apply only to the next Congress. It read: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.” This change allowed the voters to force Congress to justify their pay increases through an election. Both the House and Senate approved the proposal and sent it (along with 11 other proposed amendments) to the states. The states ratified only 10 of these, now known as the Bill of Rights, but the compensation amendment remained in limbo until the 1980s. In the early 1980s, a Texas undergraduate student’s term paper renewed the ratification effort. Arguing that the amendment’s ratification was still pending, the student raised support across the country on the amendment’s behalf. At the beginning of his campaign, only seven states had ratified the amendment, but thanks to his efforts, Michigan became the final 38th state to ratify the amendment in 1992. Not only do his efforts illustrate how one citizen can make a difference in the political process, but it also ensures that Congress remains accountable to the people. https://www.newsweek.com/move-restore-13th-amendment-74391 Below Are Some The Most Important Video's The True American History You’ll Ever Watch Today In 2025. P.S. Please Remember The Federal Reserve operates out of London and is a privately held corporation. Just as the District of Columbia, U.S.,Inc. is a foreign corporation not to be confused with the United States of America, Inc. or the united States republic or the Republic of the United States or the UNITED STATES, INC. It’s very confusing but Dunn and Bradstreet has it all. Or the SEC has allot of info. too. America's True Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.1 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6i5jxp-americas-true-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.1-babylon.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.2 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6i7pkp-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.2-be.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.3 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6iaapm-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.3-betrayal-fro.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.4 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6iccwv-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.4-babylonian-s.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.5 The Sovereign Citizens - https://rumble.com/v6idcn4-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.5-th.html Yes We The People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed America's Shocking True Secret Political History And As A Great American You Are The Real Sovereign Citizens Of U.S.A. Right Now America's Shocking Secret Political History. https://dn720005.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-great-american-adventure_202203/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2024 People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/playlists/ahtzhGqa5vE We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/v2ef8n2-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-and-international-maritime-admi.html As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html It was February 21, 1871 that the 41st US Congress sold out the Republic. On this date, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." Also known as the "Act of 1871." Congress, illegally acting on it's own behalf, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. Congress realizing that our country was in severe financial difficulty, cut a deal with the international bankers, in the process incurring a debt to those bankers. The international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city. The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated. The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the 1871 Organic Act. People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. THIS VIDEO IS SAFE TO WATCH but do not click or link To (( anticorruptionsociety )) Talked About In This Video At All... The U.S.A. Government Add A Computer Virus - Your Computer Has Been Locked - To Source Documents In This Video To Stop You! Thanks From The New World Order ! How Can We Stop or Start To Build An Anti Corruption Society ? A society is built on a structure that must have certain principles to stand firm and strong on the grounds of culture, ethics, and morality. In terms of the mentioned aspects, corruption is undoubtedly one evil that should be eliminated from a thriving society. Moreover, corruption is a factor in the system and exists in all cultures, but this phenomenon has only begun to be seriously discussed in the last 20 years. Several heavily pro-corruption reforms and initiatives have indeed been proclaimed effective, but still, no state so far has managed to control corruption through global support requirements. What is Corruption and Where Does it Exist ? Basically, corruption is the misuse of privileged status in any of the departments of government (judicial, executive and legislative) or in governmental or other organizations for the purpose of acquiring personal benefits that are not flagrantly unconstitutional for themselves or else. The culture of corruption, however, is in stark contradiction to the earliest stages of law-making as well as the state and had been regarded as immoral in the ancient times, negatively impacting the public institutions and the flourishing of the political structure. Oath Of Allegiance For New People's Republic Of United State Of America Act Today. - "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Arm Forces of the United States when required by law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." From: How to become a U S citizen by Sally Schreudin 5th Ed. (For what should be in an oath, read 8 U.S.C.A. §1448.) This is the oath that people take to become US citizens, the underlined clause is interesting, sounds like voluntary servitude. This gives a guide as to what has to be in an oath, the rejection of former allegiances with the pledge of fidelity to the nation of choice. No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government Today & Link To Top Info Wars Video's - https://rumble.com/v4w7sxh-no-oaths-of-office-in-the-federal-government-today-and-link-to-top-info-war.html No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government And Are Enemies Destroying US Government From Within As Planned On January 10th Of 1963, Forty Five Current Communist Goals Were Submitted To The Congressional Record. Number Thirteen Was, “Do Away With Loyalty Oaths.” Know One In U.S. Government Have Signed And Or Notarized Copy Or Certified Copy Of Their Oath Of Office For Over 60 Years Now. The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Any information you provide to the Republic for the United States of America is kept strictly private, unless you have given express written permission for any of those details to be made public. Contact details are used to keep you updated by email or other electronic message. If you provide a phone number or mailing address it may be distributed to a contact in your State for purposes of keeping you informed of local assemblies or a personal contact to answer any questions you may have about assisting with the restoration of the republic. Your information is never rented or sold or otherwise released for any purpose. Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick. - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... Sept. 9/11 Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers World Trade Center - https://rumble.com/v3gu5z4-sept.-911-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-towers-world-trade-cen.html https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001. This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? - https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical - https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition - https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now - https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html CIA Mind Control and CIA Secret Experiments use of biological and chemical materials. - https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html AOC Celebrate Restarting MK-Ultra Program With Progress Psychedelics Treatment. - https://rumble.com/v3045j8-aoc-celebrate-restarting-mk-ultra-program-with-progress-psychedelics-treatm.html The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). New World Order National Anthem The Ostrich Lyrics By Steppenwolf 1968 A.C.E. ! - https://rumble.com/v3yl8xx-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell A notarized copy of a document is a certified copy of the original document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public. The notary public will typically stamp the copy with their seal and signature, indicating that they have verified the authenticity of the document and the identity of the person signing it. In some cases, a notarized copy may be acceptable as evidence in court or for official purposes, but it’s always best to check with the relevant authorities or institution to confirm their specific requirements. It’s also important to note that a notarized copy is not the same as a signed copy. A signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it, but it has not been verified or authenticated by a notary public. In summary, a notarized copy is a certified copy of a document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public, while a signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. We Hope This Video Is The Great Awakening In 2025 Of The American People And Is A Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2025.

We The True People's Of U.S.A. "Open Your Eye Before You Die" America's True Shocking Secret Political History. Great American Adventure The Secret Systems Of Control Used By The Ancient Royal Bloodlines And The Globalist Ruling Elite And How Everything Prepared The Way For The Coming New World Order. This Is One Most Influential Books Ever Written Today. We At This Channel Hope You Enjoy This True Five Part Video Series. The True America's Secret History 1776 Thru 2024 Today. Since the founding of our Country, the 'Elite' (and their Robber Baron Partners) have fabricated our history, taken control of our economy and altered our form of Government and our Legal System. The Judge describes the people and events responsible for America's current state of deterioration. "The Illuminati are hell bent upon making Bible Prophecy come true and are responsible for much of the Biblical like devastation that has been occurring around the Earth." We won't be able to stop them or even protect ourselves unless we understand their modus operandi. The United States of America is Not a Nation, or Country. (It Is A Corporation) It Has No Laws, Only Corporate Statutes. Every Government Agency is Not Part of the Federal Government, but is Owned by the United Nations. The UNITED STATES of AMERICA is a corporation. Go to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Judge Dale describes the rise of the Babylonian Slave Driving System and the Babylonian Money Magic Khazarian - Sabbatean Banking System that was Created by Hammarabi. This is the Basis of our Modern System of International Commerce that is Ruled through Admiralty Law. Our Founding Fathers were Not who or what you think they were. Our History is Not what you think it is. We were completely Betrayed by our Politicians, both past and present. Jude Dale presents the most shocking and amazing secrets of America's True Political History. This turns out entire history upside down. Very much of this information is So Shocking, that it may be extremely hard to believe or accept. If you hear something that offends you, or is too hard for you to believe, continue listening. This is packed with hard core facts, most of which you are not likely to learn elsewhere. I hope you appreciate my efforts in sharing this with you. It took me 5 part video's attempts before I could record it properly. I spent all day. The Double Dealing of Washington. The Tyranny of Lincoln. The Reconstruction Act. The War Powers Act. The 13th Amendment Barred Layers. All Lawyers Swear Loyalty to the Crown. Enslavement Through Corporations. The High Treason of FDR. Citizens Declared Enemies of the State. Straw Man Corporate Fiction. You Are Owned By The State. You Are A Traded Commodity. The Khazarian Federal Reserve. You Don't Own Your Own Land. Why You Must Get License's. You And Your Children Are Wards of the Court. You Were Tricked Into Paying The National Debt. The 21 Points of Manifesto of the New World Order and Plan to Control and Enslave the World by July 4th 2026 on this the day of Old America’s up coming 250nd year of independence. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf Inscriptions: A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. The languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian. 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the two major political parties in the United States. The main differences between them lie in their ideologies, policies, and values. Democratic Party: Generally considered liberal, the Democratic Party typically supports a larger government role in economic issues, backing regulations and social welfare programs. They favor a progressive tax to finance the government’s expanded role and often endorse funding social programs through taxation. Democrats also tend to support environmental protection, gun control, less-strict immigration laws, and worker rights. Republican Party: Seen as conservative, the Republican Party typically wants a smaller government that is less involved in the economy. They support lower taxes for all and an economy with fewer government regulations and fewer government-funded social programs. Republicans also tend to desire a strong national defense and the aggressive pursuit of U.S. national security interests, often supporting states’ rights against the power of the federal government. Key issues where Democrats and Republicans differ include abortion, with Democrats generally arguing for women’s access to abortion and Republicans having more varied opinions ranging from wanting more restrictions to total bans. Additionally, the parties have differing views on the role of government in society, with Democrats believing it’s the government’s job to make society fairer and Republicans advocating for less government influence over people’s lives. It’s worth noting that while these general trends hold, individual members of each party may have diverse views, and the parties’ positions can evolve over time. Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts Anyway! Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply. The Inheritance Tax. Accounts Receivable Tax. Airline Surcharge Tax. Airline Fuel Tax. Airport Maintenance Tax. Bridge Crossing Tax or Toll Tax. Building Permit Tax. Cat License Tax. Cigarette Tax. Corporate Income Tax. Death Tax. Dog License Tax. Driving Permit Tax. Environmental Tax (Fee). Excise Taxes. Federal Income Tax. Federal Unemployment (UI). Fishing License Tax. Food License Tax. Gasoline Tax. Gross Receipts Tax. Health Tax. Hunting License Tax. Hydro Tax. Inheritance Tax. Interest Tax. Liquor Tax. Luxury Taxes. Marriage License Tax. Medicare Tax. Mortgage Tax. Parking Meter Tax. Personal Income Tax. Property Tax. Poverty Tax. Prescription Drug Tax. Provincial Income And Sales Tax. Real Estate Tax. Recreational Vehicle Tax. Retail Sales Tax. Service Charge Tax. School Tax. Sin Tax. State Park Service Tax. Telephone Federal Tax. Telephone Federal, Provincial and Local Surcharge Taxes. Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax. Vehicle License Registration Tax. Vehicle Sales Tax. Water Tax. Watercraft Registration Tax. Well Permit Tax. Workers Compensation Tax. U.S. National Parks Service Tax. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. So Again You Think This Funny In 2025 ? Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Meet Your Strawman ? Your Birth Certificate Is Worth Millions ? Swindled by U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v2dmnio-meet-your-strawman-your-birth-certificate-is-worth-millions-swindled-by-u.s.html The story of how everyone has a strawman or strawwoman or strawtransgene so i hope everyone is happy now. it's created for them at birth and how it is used to collect revenue for your government. A fun and informative animation made in the spirit of freedom. Meet your ‘strawman and woman’ – the fake ‘you’ the government creates in your name to control you and how you can stop it. How you can lawfully disconnect yourself, your family and your business from governments and the institutions of law enforcement and no longer comply with ‘Covid’19/21/24 fascism. so talks with your common law expert. A must-watch for those who choose freedom and want to end this madness. We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real Bill of State Rights - https://rumble.com/v2d7y7w-we-the-sheeple-people-of-the-united-states-of-america-and-a-real-bill-of-st.html The Second Amendment Is Not Gun Control: Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Americans The “Right to bear Arms” It Prohibits the Government from ‘Disarming The People’. The Second Amendment doesn’t give Americans the “Right to bear Arms.” The 2nd Amendment” is supposed to “Prohibit the Government” from taking our Arms and ‘Disarming The People’. It’s a protection from a possible Tyrannical Government! There are two versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights. One version was passed by the Congress, while another is found in the copies distributed to the States and then ratified by them. Welcome People's Republic Of U.S.A. Gangs-Riots-Looting-Protests Propaganda Etc.. - https://rumble.com/v2yxck6-welcome-peoples-republic-of-u.s.a.-gangs-riots-looting-protests-propaganda-.html We Our Smartest People In The World Today Felons, Illegals And MS13 Other Gangs Riots Looting Protests Propaganda Sign. Welcome Sign Reads "Official Sanctuary State" Sign At California Border and Other Sanctuary States in U.S.A. https://bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_illuminati_16.htm Welcome To Our Channel In 2025 Thank You For Watching Our Channel (What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie?) Yes We All The True People Of The U.S.A. Want To Welcome You To The New World Order In The Year Zero. The Real True Origin of the World Today and The New National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. A symbolic example of this secret truth is contained within the National Bird of the United States. Many Americans and people around the world think that our National Bird of the U.S. is an eagle. They are wrong. The symbolic bird you will find on the Great Seal of the United States is actually the mythical bird known as a Phoenix. The scroll in the beak of the Phoenix is the Latin motto of 13 letters, E Pluribus Unum, meaning in English, ” Out of Many, One”. Later an olive branch and a bundle of 13 arrows (representing peace and war, respectively) were included in the claws of the phoenix. Over its head there appears 13 stars that are arranged in rows of 1-4-3-4-1, forming a six-pointed star. The Star of David and symbol of Israel. Your Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws Work And What Is And Why Is U.S.A. Laws Are Under A Gold Fringe Flag? So have you ever walked into a court room and notice a gold fringe flag hanging in the room? Did you ever wonder why every single flag in court rooms and government buildings is a gold fringe flag? And do you remember how many times you pledged your allegiance to that flag? “I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation, under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.” Reciting the pledge was the first things we did in school every day, from day one of first grade, to the last day of eighth grade. So, after eight years of repetition, the neuro-pathways are grooved in deep into our brains. And our loyalty so strong to the red, white and blue. Then, one day, we wake up in our adult world, and guess what? The flag now has gold fringe around it and we NEVER asked why? Why is this flag different than the one we were taught to love and be loyal to? We never questioned it. We just assumed it was the same, dear old stripes and stars, and went about out busy little lives. So, the flag in the court room is a gold fringe flag. Who cares? That doesn’t affect me, right? You should care and yes, it does affect you. The gold fringe flag is a clear sign of a system being in place that is not the system we are taught to believe is in place. A gold fringe flag was historically used during times of war in maritime admiralty law(which we are in right now as well). The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. Also, you will notice the tassels hanging from the flag. These are also symbolic of admiralty law, which is the law of the sea. So, wait a minute? Our flags that hang in our government buildings and court rooms are actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law?? Yes. We are in fact, functioning in maritime admiralty law, and our court system is actually upholding a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America. Well, actually, the UNITED STATES does have a constitution but it is not the same as the original Constitution that was drafted for the republic. This is why the gold fringed flag controversy is such a big deal, because it symbolize. So, now it is up to us to figure out how to navigate our way through the law of the sea, in order to find our remedies. The possibilities for this are endless. But it basically boils down to either mastering the current system and learning how to navigate your way through it, without incurring personal liability for anything. Or, separating yourself completely from the system, and moving yourself back to common law. In other words, you can go as far as expatriating yourself from the UNITED STATES so that you no longer belong to that corporation. Therefore, their rules would no longer apply to you. Cool, huh? What Is Maritime (aka Admiralty) Law, and Why Is It Important ? What Is Maritime Law? Maritime law, also known as admiralty law, is a body of laws, conventions, and treaties that govern private maritime business and other nautical matters, such as shipping or offenses occurring on open water. International rules governing the use of the oceans and seas are known as the Law of the Sea. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. This Channel Is Up For 666 Day Now And Rumble Said We Have Made In Ad Money A Total Of $682 Dollars As Of Nov. 12, 2024 So Our Ave. Money Is $1.02 Cents A Day. Yes This Channel Is Not About Making Money At ALL. Thank You Everyone For Over 5 Million+ Views And For Watching All Of Our 872 Video's In 2022 - 2024. We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. All religion is a tool to have more control over the people's thoughts and behavior. Now religion is basically a pyramid scheme making the few at the top rich. Why does a church need a 15 million dollar compound with multiple buildings? Why does the pastor usually drive a nice new mercedes or BMW while the flock struggles and still gives the church money every week? Don't people join the church to change their life and help others the same way? It's like politicians, they should almost be volunteer jobs or just low paying. Otherwise you just keep getting people who want more money regardless of how they get it. Take from the poor and keep it doesn't sound like caring for the people. For the most part big churches were corrupted centuries ago with power hungry people. Now it's greed, a larger flock or church means they get more money every week!! The only way to attack illegal activity is to focus on the illegal activity and its perpetrators, former President Reagan argued in a 1983 speech. “You won’t get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There’s only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don’t actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time,” he said. all gun laws are unconstitutional therefore illegal and void. no government official anywhere in the united states of America has any legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction to pass or enforce any form of gun laws whatsoever anywhere in the united states of America under the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1, second amendment shall not be Infringed clause, 9th amendment enumeration clause, 10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause, 14th amendment section 1 no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause combined anyone passing or enforcing any form of gun laws anywhere in the united states of America are guilty of felony crimes in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section §241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section §242, if they are working with or on behalf of any anti Gun organizations, association, movement, group they are guilty in violation of Title 5 U.S.C. section §7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection (5), they are guilty of Perjury in violating oath of office swearing false oath, insurrection and rebellion against the constitution of the united states of America, and Treason. Yes that's what our second amendment exists for to take down terrorist tyrant traitors calling themselves government. "You won't get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There's only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up, and if you don't actually throw away the key, at least lose it for a long time." - President Reagan The natural right to keep & bear arms protects all of our other natural rights. Two of the very few reasons government exists is to protect the country and protect the natural rights of its citizens. However, the government, fed and state, have abandoned their purpose and have made themselves the enemy of America and Americans. They not only fail to protect our rights, they steal our wealth to spend Attacking our natural rights and trying to replace them with socialist welfare & subsidies like murdering babies & state-mismanaged death care. The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting…. It is about our rights, all of our rights to be able to protect ourselves from ‘All Enemies Foreign and Domestic’. This includes protections from a possible Tyrannical Government.” We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2025. Titles Of Nobility Amendment To 'Restore' legitimate 13th Amendment To The U.S. Constitution - https://rumble.com/v6hk6od-titles-of-nobility-amendment-to-restore-legitimate-13th-amendment-to-the-u..html True Titles Of Nobility Our early legislators were so concerned regarding the "still" close relationship with the British Crown hence Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which is included in the Constitution. The Titles of Nobility Amendment was proposed in 1810 and submitted to the states for ratification. By early 1812, eleven states had ratified the amendment. However, it required ratification by thirteen states to become part of the Constitution. On February 27, 1818, President James Monroe communicated to Congress that the required number of ratifications had not been reached. The amendment was rejected by Virginia (February 14, 1811), New York (March 12, 1812), Connecticut (May 13, 1813), and Rhode Island (September 15, 1814). No other state legislature has completed ratification action on it. The amendment would have stripped United States citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from an "emperor, king, prince or foreign power". It was introduced in the Senate by Democratic–Republican Senator Philip Reed of Maryland and passed by Congress on May 1, 1810. The amendment was intended to prevent U.S. citizens from accepting titles of nobility from foreign powers, reflecting concerns about European influence on the young republic. The amendment's text states: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Despite claims by some individuals known as "Thirteenthers" that the amendment was actually ratified and became part of the Constitution, official records and communications from the U.S. government confirm that it did achieve the necessary ratifications to become law. In 1789 Senator Tristrain Dalton (MA) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for ANY American accepting a "title of nobility" (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn't passed, this was the first time a "title of nobility" amendment was proposed. 1810 - 1810 - twenty years after the original suggestion of an Amendment referring to "title of Nobility", Senator Reed proposed another "Title of Nobility" Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." Understanding the reasoning behind the Original 13th Amendment is very important. Even in the 1700 & 1800's, most of our federally elected representatives and senators were lawyers by profession. It is true, the principle intent of the Original 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in the government. When first reading the Original 13th Amendment, with its references to "nobility", "honour", "emperor", "king" would lead most to dismiss the amendment as a petty document carrying no weight. In 1812, the votes of 13 states were needed to ratify an amendment. The federal government admits the Titles of Nobility Amendment was ratified by 12: 1. Maryland (December 25, 1810) 2. Kentucky (January 31, 1811) 3. Ohio (January 31, 1811) 4. Delaware (February 2, 1811) 5. Pennsylvania (February 6, 1811) 6. New Jersey (February 13, 1811) 7. Vermont (October 24, 1811) 8. Tennessee (November 21, 1811) 9. Georgia (November 22, 1811) 10. North Carolina (December 23, 1811) 11. Massachusetts (February 27, 1812) 12. New Hampshire (December 9, 1812) 13. Virginia ratified the amendment on February 7, 1812. The state's official records were burned when the British set fire to Washington and Richmond during the War of 1812, but numerous other records prove the amendment was ratified. Nevertheless, the federal government insists the amendment never became law. Of course they do! https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/original-13th-amendment1.html http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/1819_united_states_constitution_attested_a.pdf http://www.americasdirtylaundry.com/uploads/7/9/1/7/7917170/the_revised_1819_code_of_the_laws_of_virginia_663_pages.pdf The Move to 'Restore' the 13th Amendment. If there is an aspect of the human condition that is unaddressed by the platform of the Republican Party of Iowa, adopted last month at the state convention in Des Moines, you'd have to look awfully hard to find it. Its 387 enumerated planks and principles range widely over politics, culture, and economics, from sweeping statements of belief ("America is good") to the fine nuances of agricultural policy ("We support the definition of manure as natural fertilizer") and touching on the mythical "North American Union" (against) and the gold standard (for). Even so, it's a little startling to come upon section 7.19, which calls for "the reintroduction and ratification of the original 13th Amendment, not the 13th amendment in today's Constitution." Since the existing 13th Amendment bans slavery, while the "original" one was about something else entirely, the wording might give the impression that Iowa Republicans wish to reverse emancipation, which is not at all the case, according to state GOP Communications Director Danielle Plogmann. Like many aspects of Republican politics this year, it's actually about embarrassing President Obama. But you have to wonder whether the delegates knew what they were getting into. In making common cause with "Thirteenthers," as those who seek to restore the long-lost amendment are known, the party has ventured beyond the far fringes of conspiracy theory, into a mysterious lost land without lawyers or taxes. Maybe they knew what they were doing after all. This clause reads: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." http://www.thirdamendment.com/8SCIDLJ577.pdf It was an extension of Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which doesn’t allow a public office holder to receive a foreign title or similar honors without the consent of Congress. Today, the idea of a constitutional controversy about the royals may seem kind of silly, but in 1812, the United States was fighting the British and had a rocky relationship with France. The fear of both nations using noble titles as bribes, along with pensions from a foreign government, was persistent. And both the Senate and the House easily passed the TONA and passed it on to the states. By late 1812, a total of 12 states had approved the 13th Amendment and ironically, it needed a 13th state to become ratified. As the War of 1812 escalated, the TONA faded away as an issue and was never ratified. The Missing Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Since the ratification of the Constitution, thousands of constitutional amendments have been proposed, but only 27 have survived the process of Article V. Out of these, the most well known are the first 10, also known as the Bill of Rights. Interestingly, 12 amendments were originally proposed, including one on congressional compensation. This proposal later became our 27th amendment, which celebrates its 20th anniversary today. This amendment boasts the longest ratification process of any amendment—200 years! Under the Compensation Clause, Congress has the power to control its own salary. The Anti-Federalists and others at the state-ratifying conventions rightly objected to the danger of allowing this power. In response, James Madison proposed a compensation amendment stating that pay increases would apply only to the next Congress. It read: “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of representatives shall have intervened.” This change allowed the voters to force Congress to justify their pay increases through an election. Both the House and Senate approved the proposal and sent it (along with 11 other proposed amendments) to the states. The states ratified only 10 of these, now known as the Bill of Rights, but the compensation amendment remained in limbo until the 1980s. In the early 1980s, a Texas undergraduate student’s term paper renewed the ratification effort. Arguing that the amendment’s ratification was still pending, the student raised support across the country on the amendment’s behalf. At the beginning of his campaign, only seven states had ratified the amendment, but thanks to his efforts, Michigan became the final 38th state to ratify the amendment in 1992. Not only do his efforts illustrate how one citizen can make a difference in the political process, but it also ensures that Congress remains accountable to the people. https://www.newsweek.com/move-restore-13th-amendment-74391 Below Are Some The Most Important Video's The True American History You’ll Ever Watch Today In 2025. P.S. Please Remember The Federal Reserve operates out of London and is a privately held corporation. Just as the District of Columbia, U.S.,Inc. is a foreign corporation not to be confused with the United States of America, Inc. or the united States republic or the Republic of the United States or the UNITED STATES, INC. It’s very confusing but Dunn and Bradstreet has it all. Or the SEC has allot of info. too. America's True Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.1 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6i5jxp-americas-true-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.1-babylon.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.2 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6i7pkp-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.2-be.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.3 Betrayal From Within - https://rumble.com/v6iaapm-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.3-betrayal-fro.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Pt.4 Babylonian Slave Driving - https://rumble.com/v6iccwv-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-pt.4-babylonian-s.html America's Shocking Secret Political History Great American Adventure Pt.5 The Sovereign Citizens - https://rumble.com/v6idcn4-americas-shocking-secret-political-history-great-american-adventure-pt.5-th.html Yes We The People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed America's Shocking True Secret Political History And As A Great American You Are The Real Sovereign Citizens Of U.S.A. Right Now America's Shocking Secret Political History. https://dn720005.ca.archive.org/0/items/the-great-american-adventure_202203/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our Video's To Help Other In 2024 People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/playlists/ahtzhGqa5vE We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. People's Republic Of United State Of America & International Maritime Admiralty Law - https://rumble.com/v2ef8n2-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-and-international-maritime-admi.html As a soldier sworn to uphold the laws of the Constitution of the USA, what do you know about these newer movements such as "Sovereign Citizens", people that sign a "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and/or belong to the "Republic for the United States of America?" Some of these people may honestly believe in what these movements stand for and they enjoy the rights that our Constitution provides, but there are a number of domestic extremists and criminal activities associated with those groups as well. This is an open-ended question so please feel free to comment. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 41st US Congress Sold Out the Republic - https://rumble.com/v27tdu5-the-district-of-columbia-organic-act-of-1871-41st-us-congress-sold-out-the-.html It was February 21, 1871 that the 41st US Congress sold out the Republic. On this date, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." Also known as the "Act of 1871." Congress, illegally acting on it's own behalf, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. Congress realizing that our country was in severe financial difficulty, cut a deal with the international bankers, in the process incurring a debt to those bankers. The international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city. The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated. The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the 1871 Organic Act. People's Republic Of United State Of America Act of 1871-1917-1933 Fully Exposed - https://rumble.com/v2ehok8-peoples-republic-of-united-state-of-america-act-of-1871-1917-1933-fully-exp.html We hold that the American People Created a Constitutional Republic for the United States of America and never gave permission for a foreign controlled corporation to govern Us. THIS VIDEO IS SAFE TO WATCH but do not click or link To (( anticorruptionsociety )) Talked About In This Video At All... The U.S.A. Government Add A Computer Virus - Your Computer Has Been Locked - To Source Documents In This Video To Stop You! Thanks From The New World Order ! How Can We Stop or Start To Build An Anti Corruption Society ? A society is built on a structure that must have certain principles to stand firm and strong on the grounds of culture, ethics, and morality. In terms of the mentioned aspects, corruption is undoubtedly one evil that should be eliminated from a thriving society. Moreover, corruption is a factor in the system and exists in all cultures, but this phenomenon has only begun to be seriously discussed in the last 20 years. Several heavily pro-corruption reforms and initiatives have indeed been proclaimed effective, but still, no state so far has managed to control corruption through global support requirements. What is Corruption and Where Does it Exist ? Basically, corruption is the misuse of privileged status in any of the departments of government (judicial, executive and legislative) or in governmental or other organizations for the purpose of acquiring personal benefits that are not flagrantly unconstitutional for themselves or else. The culture of corruption, however, is in stark contradiction to the earliest stages of law-making as well as the state and had been regarded as immoral in the ancient times, negatively impacting the public institutions and the flourishing of the political structure. Oath Of Allegiance For New People's Republic Of United State Of America Act Today. - "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Arm Forces of the United States when required by law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by law; and that I take this obligation freely without mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God." From: How to become a U S citizen by Sally Schreudin 5th Ed. (For what should be in an oath, read 8 U.S.C.A. §1448.) This is the oath that people take to become US citizens, the underlined clause is interesting, sounds like voluntary servitude. This gives a guide as to what has to be in an oath, the rejection of former allegiances with the pledge of fidelity to the nation of choice. No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government Today & Link To Top Info Wars Video's - https://rumble.com/v4w7sxh-no-oaths-of-office-in-the-federal-government-today-and-link-to-top-info-war.html No Oaths Of Office In The Federal Government And Are Enemies Destroying US Government From Within As Planned On January 10th Of 1963, Forty Five Current Communist Goals Were Submitted To The Congressional Record. Number Thirteen Was, “Do Away With Loyalty Oaths.” Know One In U.S. Government Have Signed And Or Notarized Copy Or Certified Copy Of Their Oath Of Office For Over 60 Years Now. The People of the Republic for the United States of America do not now, nor have we ever supported any intent of over-throwing the corporation acting as the de facto United States government. We advocate peaceful, non-violent methods to restore and maintain a republican form of governance as guaranteed by the constitution. We will never advocate or take part in the kidnapping of, or violence against, any public official; nor do we affiliate with any hate groups; nor would we participate in any terrorist attack against the U.S. corporate government or any public or private official. We love our fellow man, America, its People and the Republic for which our flag stands. We believe that the rule of law should be applied justly and equally to all, both small and great without regard to race, gender, color, financial status, handicap, or religious affiliation. In short, we believe in treating our fellow man as we would like to be treated. We show tolerance and respect toward corporate law enforcement officers even when those officers, through lack of knowledge, may violate or infringe upon our unalienable rights. We are not tax protesters or “Sovereign Citizens” as defined by the UNITED STATES and Homeland Security. We believe in conducting the business of Republic governance in the open, not in secret meetings. We hold that the People intend to thoroughly research the Law and the intent of the founders. We are willing to assist the corporate local, state, or national leaders, such as governors, congressmen, senators or representatives in coming to a clearer understanding of their constitutional duties and obligations to the American People. Any information you provide to the Republic for the United States of America is kept strictly private, unless you have given express written permission for any of those details to be made public. Contact details are used to keep you updated by email or other electronic message. If you provide a phone number or mailing address it may be distributed to a contact in your State for purposes of keeping you informed of local assemblies or a personal contact to answer any questions you may have about assisting with the restoration of the republic. Your information is never rented or sold or otherwise released for any purpose. Documentary Of All Documentaries JFK To Sept 9/11 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick. - https://rumble.com/v4gdc4u-documentary-of-all-documentaries-jfk-to-sept-911-everything-is-a-rich-mans-.html Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... Sept. 9/11 Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers World Trade Center - https://rumble.com/v3gu5z4-sept.-911-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-towers-world-trade-cen.html https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001. This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ Click on the links below for the full story and or Type it into a Web Base Search ! https://web.archive.org/web/20230226151842/https://www.exposingtheirlies.com/post/some-covid-19-horror-stories-you-may-have-missed Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People? - https://rumble.com/v2qf2nk-pandemic-of-the-unvaccinated-people-will-threaten-the-live-of-vaccinated-pe.html Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical U.S.A. Government And Death To The Unvaccinated America People And American Nation CDC director says coronavirus outbreak ‘becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated’ How the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated people of the world for a darwinian perspective. As of 27 May 2023, the 10 leading causes of death accounted for 74.5% of all U.S. deaths in 2021, according to the NVSS. The US has recorded more than 47.7 million confirmed COVID-19 cases and more than 771,500 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University data. The global total for COVID-19 cases and deaths is more than 257.8 million cases and 5.15 million deaths, according to the CDC. More than 196 million Americans, 59.1% of the population, are fully vaccinated. The disease was reported as the underlying cause of death or a contributing cause of death for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. P.S. Exposing U.S.A. Gov. Their Lies! Healthy Athletes Dropping Dead of Cardiac Arrest for No Reason A New Bioweapon ? - https://rumble.com/v2dvl62-healthy-athletes-dropping-dead-of-cardiac-arrest-for-no-reason-a-new-biowea.html A New Bioweapon Globally As Of This Date 16 March 2023, there have been 760,360,956 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,873,477 deaths, reported to WHO. As of 14 March 2023, a total of 13,232,904,667 vaccine doses have been administered. 6,033,218 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines with 4,358 Fetal Deaths in U.S. as of July 4 2022 -To date, the coronavirus disease 2023 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken more than 6.8 million lives. Many of these deaths have been attributed to misleading information that fragmented a coordinated effort to mitigate loss of life. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Corrupt U.S.A. Governments - https://rumble.com/v2kq5mw-you-will-never-trust-another-celebrity-after-watching-this-corrupt-u.s.a.-g.html https://web.archive.org/web/20230224153841/https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/76789-deaths-6089773-injuries-reported-in-u-s-and-european-databases-following-covid-19-vaccines/ The unvaccinated are a risk to all of us. Why COVID-19 Shot Is Not Safe ? Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? https://rumble.com/v2affqe-why-covid-19-shot-is-not-safe-nuremberg-code-agent-orange-anthrax-vaccine-.html U.S. Government said and or told Us - We The People - COVID-19 Shot Are Safe ? LIE's ? So Per the Nuremberg Code ? Agent Orange ? Anthrax Vaccine ? Paraquat Pot ? 1920 Poisoned Alcohol ? Now Mandatory COVID-19 Shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients all part of a series of massive government cover-ups. True Story How US Government Tried To Kill Weed Smokers With A Toxic Chemical - https://rumble.com/v2ath8q-true-story-how-us-government-tried-to-kill-weed-smokers-with-a-toxic-chemic.html How U.S. Government (Killed Us Again) U.S.A. Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition - https://rumble.com/v2atam4-how-u.s.-government-killed-us-again-u.s.a.-poisoned-alcohol-during-prohibit.html CIA Killing 100,000> Year Selling Heroin In U.S.A. Our Troops Protecting Opium-Heroin - https://rumble.com/v2fg19o-cia-killing-100000-year-selling-heroin-in-u.s.a.-our-troops-protecting-opiu.html Five Billion Slaughter-bots Weapon AI based drone weapon are ready be launched now - https://rumble.com/v28znek-five-billion-slaughter-bots-weapon-ai-based-drone-weapon-are-ready-be-launc.html CIA Mind Control and CIA Secret Experiments use of biological and chemical materials. - https://rumble.com/v28z81i-cia-mind-control-and-cia-secret-experiments-use-of-biological-and-chemical-.html AOC Celebrate Restarting MK-Ultra Program With Progress Psychedelics Treatment. - https://rumble.com/v3045j8-aoc-celebrate-restarting-mk-ultra-program-with-progress-psychedelics-treatm.html The Pentagon's mandatory anthrax shots caused adverse reactions in most recipients and helped prompt many Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard members to transfer to other units or leave the military between 1998 and 2000, according to a survey by Congress's General Accounting Office (GAO). New World Order National Anthem The Ostrich Lyrics By Steppenwolf 1968 A.C.E. ! - https://rumble.com/v3yl8xx-new-world-order-national-anthem-the-ostrich-lyrics-by-steppenwolf-1968-a.c..html Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Death To You And Your Family... Its For The Greater Good. Death To You And America... Its For The Greater Good. Its A Pandemic Of The Unvaccinated People Will Threaten The Live Of Vaccinated People... Yes Its For The Greater Good. You Will Never Trust Another Celebrity After Watching This Covil-19 Corrupt U.S.A. Governments... Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Its A Plandemic For New World Order... Yes Its For The Greater Good. World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html The Great Awakening Another Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good. https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203 Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. And it appears as if no elected officials in the Federal government have one. They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words “SO HELP ME GOD” are in all caps. In the US Constitution, “So help me God” is not in all caps. And this matters. As many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. United States is a Corporation and Corporate Origins of Modern Constitutionalism - https://rumble.com/v29quxm-united-states-is-a-corporation-and-corporate-origins-of-modern-constitution.html Birth Certificate Equals Slavery Bondage Understanding How Admiralty Maritime Laws - https://rumble.com/v2dau7c-birth-certificate-equals-slavery-bondage-understanding-how-admiralty-mariti.html "Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the law of the high seas or, International Maritime Admiralty. When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. This is why, when you were born, the doc (dock) has to sign your birth (berth) certificate. It’s a maritime Admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. Anything in this country, if it's a lawful legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. Why? Because you do not own your body. You do not own yourself. All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. You are not a human. You're not a living entity. You're a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. So you are a corporation, whether you know it or not. But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called UNITED STATES. This is the way the law works." ~ Jordan Maxwell A notarized copy of a document is a certified copy of the original document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public. The notary public will typically stamp the copy with their seal and signature, indicating that they have verified the authenticity of the document and the identity of the person signing it. In some cases, a notarized copy may be acceptable as evidence in court or for official purposes, but it’s always best to check with the relevant authorities or institution to confirm their specific requirements. It’s also important to note that a notarized copy is not the same as a signed copy. A signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it, but it has not been verified or authenticated by a notary public. In summary, a notarized copy is a certified copy of a document that has been verified and authenticated by a notary public, while a signed copy is a copy of the document that has been signed by the person who created it. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. We Hope This Video Is The Great Awakening In 2025 Of The American People And Is A Powerful Documentary From What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH - https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html Yes Its For The Greater Good. Yes Thank You For Killing Yourself Too... We The Sheeple People's Republic Of United State Of America... Yes Its For The Greater Good. With Love From Your Uncle Sam... World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html Yes Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2025.

The Illuminati’s Secret Celebrity Murder and Cloning Centers See For Yourself The World Of Clones And How You Can Tell The Difference! The World of Cloning Really Does Exist! Have you ever noticed that, sometimes, a certain celebrity seems ever so slightly off? Maybe its an errant beauty mark or the fact that their eyelids have begun to blink sideways. You can feel in your heart that something’s just not right. That’s because your darling idol is dead. Don’t worry, though, because before they were killed, your favorite celebrity was cloned. Which means that unlike Paul McCartney (who was simply replaced with a lookalike), countless incarnations of your dearly departed could be walking among us for centuries to come. https://m.moam.info/donald-marshall_6479c039097c476d028b90c2.html 12 Major Human Cloning Pros Human cloning in the form of identical twins is the closest comparison that we have to this scientific concept at this time. Artificial cloning processes have yet to be developed, and they may never be brought to light because of the numerous ethical and moral concerns involved with the technology that would allow a genetically identical copy of an existing or previously existing individual to be grown. Even when there are naturally duplicated "clones" that share a nearly identical genetic profile, they are not exact duplicates. Each person has different experiences, thoughts, and perspectives that combine to create a unique individual. Even people who share a similar environment with similar DNA can turn out to be very different individuals. When looking at the major human cloning pros and cons, it is essential that we balance the need to evolve the scientific processes involved in this artificial task while addressing the ethical and moral concerns that currently exist when manually creating or changing a genome. These are the crucial points to review. 1. Human cloning could resolve fertility issues Thanks to human cloning, couples who are unable to naturally conceive will be able to create children to whom they are genetically related. Infertility could become a thing of the past because doctors could take the genetic profile of each parent, infuse it into an embryo outside of the body, and potentially grow the fetus in a laboratory environment. This process could help countries such as Japan, which are struggling with low birth rates right now. The BBC reported in late 2018 that there was a remarkable decline in fertility rates in the developed world. In 1950, women had an average of 4.7 children during their lifetime. In 2018, the fertility rate was just 2.4 children per woman. In the UK, that rate is just 1.7 children. When a country's birth rate drops below 2.1 children per family, the population will eventually shrink. 2. Human cloning could lead to medical advancements The processes of human cloning could help to create new advances in medical science. By creating a duplicated individual, it would become possible to share genetic material which could help to prevent or cure diseases that may have a negative impact on that person’s life. It could create a new line of research that is equivalent to what we see today with embryonic stem cell therapy potential. 3. Human cloning unlocks the benefits of genetic modification Human cloning requires a precise form of genetic engineering. Using our current technologies, we would implement enzymes from bacteria to locate genes in our DNA to create the necessary modifications for duplication. This technology has been in use since 2015, so it is not something with which we are completely unfamiliar. We know of five potential benefits to genetic modification within the human genome that are worth exploring. • It could aid in the treatment of genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis and thalassaemia. • Genetic modification could also help us deal with complex diseases such as schizophrenia or heart disease. • Human cloning could help us discover new ways to combat the natural aging process, including potential opportunities to stop it. • Babies would no longer have to enter a genetic lottery before birth to find out what their human potential would be throughout their lives. • It has the potential to lower the overall cost of disease treatment around the world. 4. Human cloning could help us recover faster from devastating injuries Interventional orthopedics is a non-surgical option that uses a patient’s own cells to help repair the damage that occurs during a traumatic injury. Sprains or strains to a ligament will typically heal in 4 to 6 weeks with rest, but when a tear occurs, the primary treatment option (especially with an ACL) is to apply a tissue graft at a steeper angle to encourage the healing process. The current procedure increases a patient’s risk of developing osteoarthritis and cartilage damage later in life. Through the process of human cloning, the cells can begin to rebuild on their own. It creates an opportunity for a faster recovery because doctors are duplicating the exact cells that the body requires. 5. Human cloning reduces issues of socioeconomic equality According to the Science X Network, up to 10% of children in the developed world are currently taking medication such as Ritalin to help with their poor self-control issues. This medication makes it possible for today’s kids to improve their educational prospects because they have more control over their behaviors. Education, special services, diets, and other social interventions are also used to correct the natural inequality that occurs through the natural reproduction process. Moving toward human cloning would allow the next generation of children to require fewer interventions throughout their lives because they would be genetically equipped to handle the challenges that might come their way. 6. Human cloning could eliminate defective genes and chromosomes The statistics on genetic diseases are particularly grim in today’s world. At some point during their lives, about 1% of the population in the United States will develop a specific disorder with a genetic foundation. Approximately 1 in 100,000 people in the U.S. have Syndrome A at the present time, with 100,000 children worldwide dealing with Syndrome B. The current leading cause of newborn death is birth defects. All of these issues could be reduced or eliminated if we were to embrace the benefits that human cloning provides. 7. Human cloning would allow great minds to continue benefiting humanity Imagine what Albert Einstein would’ve been able to accomplish if he had 100 years to work instead of a few decades during a single lifetime. Where would we be today if Leonardo da Vinci had had access to modern technology with his impressive imagination? Because of human cloning, we would be able to set the stage for humankind’s greatest minds to continue doing their work, albeit as new individuals, which would help our society advance at an even more rapid pace. Significant contributions to science, music, literature, and the arts are possible because of the technologies involved in human cloning. 8. Human cloning would help us create more stem cells Stem cells are what help to build, maintain, and repair the body throughout our lives. There are processes that these cells perform naturally, allowing them to be manipulated by doctors to repair diseased or damaged organs and tissues. When they are transferred from one person to another, the recipient sees these cells as foreign bodies, triggering an immune response. Cloning is a way to create genetically identical cells that could help to create better health outcomes for people, especially if they suffer from a rare genetic disease. 9. Human cloning could eliminate viral epidemics The primary goal of treating a virus such as HIV/AIDS is to suppress the mechanisms involved that harm human health. When discovered in the general population, human cloning could help to replicate a natural resistance to these diseases, disorders, and conditions. For as long as disease has existed on our planet, there have been a select few people who have a natural resistance to specific illnesses. A mutation of the CCR5 gene, for example, creates a natural resistance to HIV. Some people naturally resist the influenza virus better than others. Researchers even found that a group of women in West Africa remained perfectly healthy despite repeated exposure to the Ebola virus. Human cloning would allow us to take advantage of these natural immunities to create new vaccines, medical treatments, or even children in future generations who would not be forced to struggle with such devastating illnesses. 10. Human cloning could adapt our population to changing planetary conditions The processes of evolution allow humankind to begin adapting to changing conditions on our planet. Future generations may be able to adapt to a warming world thanks to the slow adaptations of our genetic profile to this shift. Human cloning could speed up this process to help save lives that would normally be lost through the process of natural selection. We would be able to take the genetic profile of those who are the most resistant to any change, duplicate it, and then spread it to the rest of the population. 11. Human cloning could lead to advancements in organ transplantation There are over 100,000 people on organ transplant wait lists in the United States right now. Roughly 10,000 individuals are waiting for a critical organ, such as a heart. Through the processes of human cloning, it may become possible to duplicate a patient’s needed organ in a laboratory setting to create a viable outcome. This process would also reduce the immune response that occurs after this procedure takes place because the new organ would be based on the cells of the individual instead of a random donation. 12. Human cloning could help us understand the reasons why spontaneous abortions occur Spontaneous abortion, which is the medical term for pregnancy loss or "miscarriage," is the natural death of a fetus or embryo before it can survive independently. Approximately 80% occur in the first 12 weeks of the pregnancy, with about half of the incidents involving a chromosomal abnormality of some type. Among women who are currently pregnant, up to 1 in 5 may experience this outcome. The processes behind human cloning would help us to understand more about these abnormalities, and then correct them to prevent future losses. “You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” Issues such as treason and crimes against humanity fall under the military purview and allow for a speedy trial in secrecy, commonly resulting in executions or lengthy stays at GITMO. EXPAND YOUR THINKING: When Trump executes or arrests someone, and he still needs them to remain in character to prevent everyone from knowing they are missing, they create White Hat clones. These clones are good clones, but only needed until appropriate punishment. Walk with me on a journey, a journey through reality and speculation. One that will leave you both questioning reality, and existence. This is not a typical thread for me in subject matter, but you will still see plenty of pictures. Might sneak a map in too. Ok that’s a pretty strong hint where we are going tonight. Not the only place, this will wend in a couple of directions, but it should keep your mind in the game. I want to start by thanking a couple of Anons for helping me with this. I robbed pictures from them without remorse, and they were willing accomplices. Hmm.. that makes me think that we are being directed. Perhaps all of those ads popping up aren’t coincidental after all. I love the indirect nods that we are going in the right direction! In 2010 however Putin was diagnosed with Spinal Cancer and German doctors told him he didn’t have much days left to live. Putin then became missing for 10 days due to The Secret Shadowy Russian Underground Government, that acted quickly & effectively & replaced the real Putin by cloning him in the underground cloning labs. The fake Putin clone, or double was deployed and he takes over the real Putin’s life in politics and private life. His wife went missing, after she refused to cooperate, and live with a fake clone, who cannot replace her husband in any way shape, and form. WHAT WOULD REALLY HAPPEN IF YOU CLONED YOURSELF? Cloning turns out to be more complicated than finding an old mosquito trapped in some amber. Human cloning, specifically, is so hard, to the best of anyone's knowledge, this sci-fi feat has never actually been achieved. Partly, it's an issue of technology. Humans are complex and sensitive creatures, right down to our DNA. But more pertinently, perhaps, considering animal cloning began in the 1990s, human cloning is a thorny political issue –- and not a particularly divisive one. As of 2021, 86% of Americans surveyed in a Gallup poll agreed human cloning is "morally wrong." And that number has only grown over the years. Few issues share this level of consensus — and scientists largely agree. In 2003, 60 different scientific academies worldwide called for a United Nations ban on human cloning, according to The Guardian. Despite the challenges, explicit laws against human cloning are somewhat scant. Many also believe the technology is nearly within grasp. So you can forget those old canards like, "two identical objects cannot occupy the same space." You definitely wouldn't destroy the universe by hugging your clone. Human cloning is just an engineering challenge, so despite public opinion, it's probably inevitable. But a crucial thing to keep in mind as you mull doubling your DNA, unlike the full-grown "replicants" of "Blade Runner" and similar scenarios, a human clone would almost certainly start as an embryo. Here's what would really happen if you cloned yourself. YOU'D WIN A VERY UNETHICAL SCIENCE FAIR Cloning humans isn't just hard, it's so far been impossible, largely because of our uniquely designed sex cells. There's even a weird difference in the degree of difficulty in cloning seemingly similar animals. "I think no one realized how hard cloning would be in some species though relatively easy in others," Stanford bioethicist Hank Greely told Insider. "Cats: easy; dogs: hard; mice: easy; rats: hard; humans and other primates: very hard." Various scientists have been claiming to have cracked the human clone code since the late '90s, and yet the facts just don't back up these assertions, according to the NIH's National Human Genome Research Institute. Cloning yourself or other genetically related primates would most likely involve removing a donor egg's nucleus to be replaced with a custom nucleus from an adult cell. But in primate eggs (people are primates), a pair of proteins essential for cell division called "spindle proteins" are so close together that messing with this sensitive cell removes these essential components for growth. This is a real corker of a problem. And since big pharma has not expressed much commercial interest in human cloning, according to bioethicist George Annas of Boston University, per Insider, funding hasn't scaled with the challenges. In short, your efforts to clone yourself might come with scientific prestige, public condemnation, and possible jail time, but not necessarily millions. YOUR CLONE PROBABLY WON'T LOOK LIKE YOU Clones aren't exact copies in practice. This fact is not at all fun and irritatingly flies in the face of the word clone. For one, your clone would start as a baby, not spring from a 3D printer for people. Depending on your age, you might be pretty old by the time your copy took shape. The main issue though is called gene expression. Matching DNA doesn't mean matching development. Anyone with an "identical" twin knows the term is a bit of a misnomer. There are always little differences. That's because the environment "plays a big role in how an organism turns out," according to the NIH's National Human Genome Research Institute. Genes are like light switches. They can either be on or off. Lots of things can flip these switches — or not flip them. The NIH points out the first cat to be cloned had a coat that was very different from her genetically identical mother, so the two didn't resemble each other at all. If your plan is to clone yourself for trickery like Christian Bale in "The Prestige," you might need to tap into Christopher Nolan's larger oeuvre and think bigger. Perhaps if you implanted your clone embryo into an exact copy of your own past, that cloned universe would express genes just like it went down in you. But also, since that's not a thing, maybe not. Who knows. YOU COULD GO TO JAIL The United States has no explicit federal laws against human cloning, according to The New Atlantis. Florida, Delaware, Oregon, Texas, Washington, and others have no state laws against human copy-pasting either. Still other states like California have made exemptions for cloning research as long as a baby is not produced. Arkansas, Michigan, and several others, however, have prohibited all cloning completely. So unless you're careful about location, you and your clone could be in double trouble — though in the event you were sentenced to prison, maybe there's somebody who could take your place. Federal legislation to ban human clones has been abortively attempted many times, some with laughably low civil penalties like a $5,000 fine — unlikely to dissuade even a high-concept Doublemint gum ad. This power vacuum left the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in charge, which simply asserted authority in 1998, making two simple decrees: If you want to make a clone, you need FDA permission; and also, the answer is no. They cited "major unresolved safety questions," as per The New Atlantis. Internationally, in 2019 the Chinese government sentenced the first scientist to create a genetically engineered baby to three years in prison, according to STAT. He Jiankui used CRISPR (DNA editing) technology to edit the DNA of twins (aka natural clones) in order to create HIV immunity. Despite the seemingly laudable aim, a Chinese court ruled the experiment was "in the pursuit of personal fame and gain."Many scientists also denounced the experiment. Three children were born of these cloning-adjacent efforts. YOUR CLONE MIGHT DROP DEAD Don't count on clone labor anytime soon because even after you've successfully cracked the genomic code, persuaded the public it's all good, and evaded various laws, very likely, your double would have some health trouble. The first mammalian clone formed from an adult cell was Dolly the sheep, according to Scientific American. This was huge news in 1996 and seemed to portend a brave new world. But Dolly died young, at only 6 years old, roughly middle-aged for a sheep. She had early-onset osteoarthritis, and researchers at the time thought cloning might've caused it. However, a later study said this conclusion was "unfounded" even though Dolly had other health issues, and therewere many Dolly clones, most of them duds. Large mammals, in general, have proven difficult to duplicate. A Massachusetts company tried to clone an endangered wild Asian ox in 2001. It died of dysentery in two days, according to Science. Two years later they took DNA from a long-dead "Banteng," and implanted the deceased animal's life force into surrogate cows. In 30 tries, only two Bantengs came to term. One was healthy, the other was born double the normal birth weight and was euthanized. But even with one success, experts remained skeptical. "I strongly disagree that these clones are 'normal' just because they survive the postnatal period and appear normal," Rudolf Jaenisch of MIT told Science, pointing out many clones who initially seem fine develop serious health issues and die prematurely. YOUR CLONE MIGHT BE DEFORMED Even if your likely illegal clone didn't immediately drop dead and wasn't chased down by a torch-wielding mob of Americans who've already decried such experiments, this futuristic little Frankenstein might be similarly monstrous. "The cloning process seemed to have interfered with the normal genetic functioning," explained a 1999 study of a deformed calf clone, published in The Lancet (via the National Center for Biotechnology Information). It was already known clones tended to die shortly before or just after birth, but researchers also noted the process is likely to cause long-term abnormalities. This fact "should be taken into account in debates on reproductive cloning in human beings," warned study lead Dr. Jean-Paul Renard. The unfortunate calf clone died at seven weeks from severe anemia, which is an iron deficiency. The scientists discovered upon autopsy the animal's lymphatic system had almost completely failed to develop. In other studies, mice that initially appeared normal suddenly "grew grotesquely fat," according to The New York Times. Researchers told the Times in 2001 it appeared even though cloning does copy DNA exactly, gene expression is directly affected, with "random errors" that can emerge at any time. "With cloning, you are asking an egg to reprogram in minutes or, at most, in hours,” MIT researcher Dr. Rudolph Jaenisch explained. A natural process that usually takes months or years is so condensed that copying errors simply pile up. So, even if your clone survived infancy and briefly thrived, things could go terribly wrong at any time. YOUR CLONE COULD DESTROY HUMANITY Your clone is unlikely to develop uber-strength or the megalomaniacal genius necessary to take over the world — though, given the likelihood of massive genetic mutations, anything is possible. The real threat your clone could possibly pose to humanity is that its altered DNA could enter the human germline, adversely afflicting your descendants in perpetuity. A germline mutation is when a change in your body's sex cell, the sperm or egg, becomes a part of the DNA of one's offspring, according to the National Cancer Institute. As discussed, since cloning people has proven difficult because of how human sex cells are constructed, it's conceivable gene-editing technology like CRISPR could be used in your quest for a clone by altering this cell to make it easier to work with. But meddling here could cause genetic changes to your clone that might be passed on to your clone's offspring too, according to Ethics, Medicine and Public Health. Thus, if your experiments in self-actualization introduced some catastrophic error — say a mutation for antisocial and psychopathic personality traits — this genetic gambit could become a permanent feature of many future humans. If you don't think one bad seed could possibly cause much damage, consider that Mongol Emperor Ghenkis Khan did so much pillaging, today, one in 200 men on earth is a direct descendant of this brutally effective warlord, according to Discover. YOU MAY HAVE TO MAKE TWO CLONES, NOT ONE Clones often come in clumps. Depending on the methodology used, making a clone may require implanting two clones into a female womb, much like how monozygotic twins are formed naturally, as perDiscover. "Gene cloning" is all the rage these days, maybe because it doesn't involve creating a breathing being with sad eyes that will make you question your choices. This more humane process involves taking a segment of DNA and placing it inside a bacterial cell's DNA, which acts as a natural little replication factory, according to Discover. This technique has helped develop vaccines and antigen tests, like the one that detects COVID-19. However, the way Dolly the sheep and other mammals were made was via reproductive cloning. The most advanced approach is called somatic cell nuclear transfer, or SCNT. It uses an electrical current to fuse an adult sperm cell with an egg that's had its nucleus removed.But since removing a human nucleus from an egg has proved so difficult to do without stripping away the cell's power to grow, you and your clone may need to rely on an older method wherein a fertilized embryo is simply split (like in identical twins) and both are implanted into a surrogate womb. Often in science, relying more on mother nature can help you get to your goal. But that also might mean your clone will have a creepy clone of its own. YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO CLONE YOUR ENTIRE BODY There's a concept in the clone world called therapeutic cloning that avoids some of the deeper ethical concerns in which you could simply clone body parts, a la carte. This technique involves grabbing stem cells, which according to Discover, can be derived from a cloned embryo. Stem cells are special and ironically called "unspecialized" because they can renew on their own through cell division and can be used to grow any kind of tissue or organ you might want. This technology has implications for many debilitating diseases like diabetes, wherein a person's pancreas is no longer properly producing insulin, letting blood sugar run wild in the body causing a cascade of nasty health complications. Thirty four million Americans were saddled with diabetes as of 2020, according to the CDC. That's one in 10 people in the U.S. An advancement in stem cell cloning could theoretically mean your own genetically identical donor organs could be available — and your body wouldn't reject them. Pancreatic cloning alone would almost certainly save the life of someone you know. YOU COULD FORM A BASKETBALL TEAM BY YOURSELF If you got away with cloning yourself from a legal standpoint and somehow worked around the problem of raising your own clone from infancy, the world of horseback Polo actually proves that cloned animals can form effective and cohesive teams. In 2016 a man named Adolfo Cambiaso rode six different horses to victory during a Polo match in Buenos Aires. Except these weren't actually different horses. They were all identical clones, each named Cuartetera, according to Science. Polo is like "hockey on horseback," and many players switch mounts during the game. But imagine if when Lebron James got tired or injured his coach could simply sub in another Lebron James, with completely fresh legs. Or heck, how about an all-Lebron team? Who would beat that? That's the idea here and unlike in horse racing, which has banned the practice, cloning has been fully embraced in the Polo world. Many experts predicted cloned horses would be inferior, but Cambiaso won his first match with these replicant mares in 2013 and seems to have showed scientists were wrong. It's also a proof of concept considering six different horses were born healthy enough to compete in sports at a high level. These improvements in the underlying technology could portend success for your own human cloning experiments. YOU MAY BE ACCUSED OF FRAUD Modern scientific advancements are always a bit of a black box to the lay public. This informational asymmetry has allegedly allowed fraudsters to steal the cloning limelight. In 2004 a South Korean scientist published a paper in the journal Science claiming to have cloned human embryos via stem cells. The next year he claimed to have created embryos from combining eggs and a variety of other bodily cells — seemingly solving the technical problem with human cloning. The whole thing turned out to be a fraud. In 2006 a fertility doctor namedPanayiotis Zavos claimed he'd implanted clone embryos in five different women, according to Wired. In 2009 the same doctor, working from a "secret laboratory" in the Middle East, was promoting a Discovery Channel documentary and claimed to have implanted 11 clone embryos in four more women, according to The Guardian. Then, in 2021 a woman named Diane White accused the good doctor of implanting her with his own sperm when she came to his Kentucky fertility "clinic" in 1988, according to Daily Beast. White's lawsuit alleges Zavos had neither a medical degree nor a license at the time and says DNA testing confirms he's the daddy. White also says she once picked up a sperm sample from Zavos personally, where he insisted she carry it in her bra for warmth until she got to her gynecologist's office. The rogue doctor has denied everything, but also not provided proof of his many cloning claims. YOU'D GET A CALL FROM JEFF BEZOS Everyone knows the big-tech bros are having a pretty exciting space race. Less heralded are their sudden investments into human longevity research. After decades of doctors treating anti-aging inquires like a career-ending pseudoscience, as Aubrey De Gray has long pointed out, suddenly, Earth's most titanic power-brokers are taking seriously the premise that aging is not inevitable. Amazon's Jeff Bezos, Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and famed billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel are now all pumping cash into companies that could "solve death," according to The Guardian. This is good news for anyone currently identifying as mortal. "There's millions of people now who won't see death if they choose," claims the director of the Coalition of Radical Life Extension, James Strole. He says a human body maintained perfectly can last 125 extremely sober years at most, but obviously, many of those decades are lost to decrepitude. Longevity companies are mainly focused on interventions at the cellular or DNA level. The 2018 discovery that naked mole rats basically don't age, along with allegedly successful life extension in lab mice, has gotten hopes for immortality high. Related human trials are already underway, and one CEO who took a dose of her own medicine is claiming to have "grown younger" by 30 years. Anyone who published a related breakthrough in human cloning could expect a call inquiring if the advancement is applicable to this suddenly feverish search for the fountain of youth. GRIEVING FAMILIES WOULD WANT YOUR SECRET TOO The scientists who cloned Dolly the sheep gained worldwide notoriety upon their shocking announcement in 1996. But they probably weren't expecting the avalanche of inquires from grieving families wanting loved ones back from the dead. Dolly's fame was not because she was the first clone — she wasn't. That honor actually belongs to a sea urchin in 1885, according to Gizmodo. Dolly was, though, the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. Many mourners quickly understood the implications for humans, and Dolly's makers at PPL Therapeutics were suddenly "bombarded with requests" to replicate their radical success in people, according to the Mirror. The former managing director of Dolly's lab, Dr. Ron James, described one of these letters: "... a chap's girlfriend had died a couple of weeks before he was due to get married, and [asked] could we clone her? The answer is, theoretically it might be possible, but you're going to get a tiny baby that's going to be 18 or 20 years younger than your girlfriend was." American Billionaire John Sperling did however successfully make a more wonderful life for some families who lost pets with his hilariously named venture, Genetic Savings and Clone, per The Guardian. The company copied six cats for a whopping $50,000 apiece. The fee was then dropped to the bargain-basement price of $32,000. Sperling's venture was not able to clone dogs though, and that proved fatal. GS&C shuttered operations in 2006, according to NPR. Evidence Shows Hillary Clinton Is A Robot And Clinton's 100s Dead Body Count Info. - https://rumble.com/v2hx6cg-evidence-shows-hillary-clinton-is-a-robot-and-clintons-100s-dead-body-count.html Journeyman presidential candidate Hillary Clinton interacted with some everyday Iowa students in a garage on Tuesday, and taught all of us a lesson in the art of relatable politicking. On several occasions during the roundtable event, Clinton revealed herself as a true "triple threat" by demonstrating an array of crucial skills that, when deployed correctly, can make even the most out-of-touch politicians appear somewhat human. Eye Contact — One of the easiest ways to make an everyday person feel that you really care about what they are saying, even if you are secretly counting the seconds until you can return to the plush leather "safe space" in your luxury van. This is particularly useful for a extremely wealthy person who is forced to interact with a commoner on the commoner's home turf. Head Nod — A critical tool of everyday human interaction, especially when paired with meaningful eye contact. It makes the commoner feel as though you agree with them, and can empathize with their everyday concerns even if you can't. Keep in mind that most people who have never met a sultan, much less shared a Gulfstream jet with one, usually don't have anything interesting to say, and certainly won't be able to write a six-figure check to your Super PAC. Alas, they are still allowed to vote. Hydration — The human body needs water, but simply taking a sip every now and then won't increase your favorability rating. Everybody drinks; that's boring. Some may argue that hydrating while engaged in nodding eye contact is just showing off. But it can also be a indispensable diversionary tactic for those who instinctively scowl whenever a commoner starts to whine about their everyday problems. They've never struggled to pay off two mortgages. They've never felt the crippling anxiety that comes with standing before a crowd of wealthy Wall Street executives. Hillary's ability to perform all three tasks at once may not seem very impressive at first glance. However, as seasoned politicians will attest, this can only be accomplished after years of grueling practice. Republicans should not let Hill Dogg's otherwise disastrous rollout fool them into underestimating her strength as a candidate. She is a genuine triple threat, and will be a formidable opponent in 2016. Proof she's a robot Hillary Clinton doesn't flinch as a fly Lands on her face during the presidential debate - sparking avalanche of internet jokes. A fly landed on Hillary Clinton's face as she was in full flow in the debate at Washington University in St Louis Twitter went crazy with dozens of memes poking fun at the Democratic nominee A spoof profile page for the fly was even created by one Twitter user. While the two presidential candidates were slugging it out in the second debate many viewers thought a fly had landed on their television screens. They were baffled because the fly landed on Hillary Clinton's face and she did not even flinch, leading some to suggest she was a robot like one of those on TV series Westworld. Within minutes of the fly's appearance at Washington University in St Louis, Twitter was a swarm of memes, mostly poking fun at the Democratic nominee. Since the Clinton’s rise to political fame in the 1990s, various rumors surrounding their connections to mysterious deaths have been circulated. These claims assert that both Bill and Hillary Clinton have orchestrated the deaths of several acquaintances who supposedly had “dirt” on the family (Emery). The belief is mostly held by those of the opposing conservative party in efforts to further tarnish the family’s reputation. The conspiracy theory was brought up during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 presidential campaigns. The original body count list is attributed Linda Thompson, a lawyer and conspiracy theorist of the American Justice Federation, an organization which has made its name by fabricating antigovernment stories (Weiss). Since its initial debut, the theory has been promoted through chain emails, novels, and documentaries. Now that they’ve successfully cloned primates, we’re next. But are we ready to welcome the clone versions of us into our lives? If you could clone yourself, would you do it? In a few years’ time, this may be a choice you are able to make. Chinese scientists announced they had successfully cloned a pair of macaque monkeys. These primates’ genes have much more in common with humans than those of Dolly the Sheep, and the feat has sparked many editorials fearing it is only a matter of time before we have the ability to clone humans. While the Chinese scientists said they had no intention of cloning humans, and the UN is officially opposed to human cloning, it seems naïve to think that there won’t be one jurisdiction that eventually capitalises on the market potential of such technology. A small island nation, for example, may jump at the chance to be the world’s go-to human cloning destination. So, let’s just assume for a minute that it does happen. While many people associate human cloning with dystopian images of organ harvesting and slaves, the reality, I believe, will be far more mundane. People will simply clone themselves to raise as their children. Imagine it. The family portrait of the future could very well contain the same person replicated four different times, at different stages of their life. There would be the “original” and their flock of clones, each one only slightly different to the next. Pregnancy would likely be less of a mystery, as there would be no guessing what your child would look like when they popped out, no hoping that they wouldn’t inherit your big nose. Rather, you would give birth to a baby that looked exactly the same as you did when you were born. You would then be able to watch it grow as you did – teeth coming through at the exact week yours did, the kid starting to walk as you did, and later going through puberty as you unfortunately did. Of course, parents with “original” kids do that now, but the difference is that clones would pan out exactly as their forebear. The parent would essentially be viewing themselves as a child, an interesting phenomenon. You might not remember what you looked like as a 1-year-old, for example, but now you could see yourself in the flesh. It would essentially be an exercise of the self, you’d be able to witness your ageing all over again. Then again, that might not be a good thing! Your preconceptions of yourself as an adorable, cute little bub might come crashing down. Instead, that memory of being a bald 3-year-old feeling very self-conscious at your ballet production may be relived. For some people, this isn’t such a strange concept. We all know someone whose kids look very similar to them and has the same allergies and the like, so perhaps having a clone wouldn’t be too different. I think the more interesting aspect to consider is the personality of the clone(s). Would they turn out exactly the same as their original, or retain a sense of individuality? This takes us back to the old philosophical argument about whether or not we are born with a personality or “soul”, and how much of our personality is innate versus drawn from experience. People prone to self-loathing or narcissism shouldn’t have clones. Plus how would the world evolve if we all just cloned ourselves ad nauseam? Seems less likely the world would produce Julia Gillards, Mozarts, Einsteins, if we’re just cloning ourselves. Few would argue that our experiences shape our thoughts and emotional responses, and yet I also believe that we are born with a personality. Or at the very least, we are inclined towards certain temperaments and features, which our genes surely play a part in. And if our clones did turn out to have very similar personalities to us, it could prove hard not to become a pushy, overbearing parent. When your clone is begging to join the fire brigade, for example, you would know that they would eventually tire of this. How could you reasonably be expected to humour them? “I understand you want to save lives right now but in a couple of years, you’ll get over this hero complex and be happy to work as an accountant,” you explain. “Don’t tell me what to do, I’m my own person!” they reply. “No, you are not,” you shoot back, in a moment of anger. Or what if the clone turns out to be a genius, with a quick-wittedness and creativity you never managed? It could be difficult not to compare yourself to your smarter protégé and feel a pang of jealousy. And people who are prone to self-loathing or narcissism surely shouldn’t have clones. That would be a recipe for disaster. Plus how would the world evolve if we all just cloned ourselves ad nauseam? It seems less likely the world would produce Julia Gillards, Mozarts, Einsteins, if we’re just cloning ourselves. We admire beautiful and highly intelligent people due to their uniqueness, the fact they bring a spark of originality of thought or looks that the world has never seen before. Do we risk losing this if we stop shaking up new cocktails of genes? Would clones be fine wines that age better with each generation or musty grapes that simply sour? I have a feeling I know what the answer would be with my genes! But perhaps that isn’t the case with everyone. Some people’s clones may simply be better educated, more advanced versions of their originals. They would surely be influenced by the wider social context in which they live and their various experiences. This could be the way of the future – what do you think? Clown world became hell sooner than you expected. Punctuated by vignettes of street violence, each day bleeds into the next. Most days, you don’t see other people in the flesh. “No contact” delivery ensures seamless individuated consumption. Various platforms offer their condolences. In these trying times, Postmates is here for you. 25% of designer face mask proceeds go to nonprofits that teach inner city black girls how to code. Pornhub Premium is free. Feel better, they insist. We’re in this together. Venturing into the public square for groceries, an amoebic cluster of what you skeptically still identify as human beings—nice, normal people—can be observed darting from aisle to aisle, making mundane appetitive pursuits as before, but more frantically now. As if under duress. When quarantine began, they used to gesture sympathy by cartoonishly twisting their eyebrows and tipping their head to one side. This was before it was decided who could walk which way down which aisles. Today, someone has taped arrows to the floor. All of you want to return home as soon as possible. The only safe social distance, to be sure, is total isolation. Home is where nice, normal people are safe from the unwashed, unmasked deplorables among them, whose recalcitrance is as dirty and dangerous as their breath. By that same token, you also prefer to distance yourself—from that quietly desperate, empty-yet-penetrating, SSRI-infused hive-gaze, which feels increasingly like the eye of Sauron. You know the statistics. You know the death rate, and you know masks are useless. But 72% of nice, normal people now support jail time for violations of mask mandates. Their blinking eyes, tired of performing, never linger on another pair for too long anymore, except to communicate some contempt, disgust, or perhaps sublimated envy or lust for those who have not yet enthusiastically accepted the new public health measures. You cannot escape the creeping sensation that they’re watching you. So, you muzzle yourself. I Can’t Breathe Once home, you retreat to the virtual world. It’s a void and a vacuum. Empty black squares, icons of the latest, greatest, wokest Great Awakening, are everywhere, shared widely, incessantly, by heretofore apolitical nice, normal people. Captions read: “I will never understand,” “I am blinded by my whiteness,” “I must use my voice to amplify black voices.” Self-abnegation is the new self-help. You haven’t seen something go so viral among white women since pumpkin spice. Nice normies are buying and reading the books. Catelynn is doing the work. You know this because so many Catelynns have posted selfies with White Fragility…in an N-95 surgical mask. Like autoerotic asphyxiation, except that in the moment of climax (the final touch on a perfect caption), they screech that their abject political fetish is for the sake of humanity, white man. It seems your role in relation to “humanity” is exclusively that of an antagonistic outside observer. You are both oppressor and repressor. You know the statistics. You know the intra- and interracial crime rates. You think, like Kanye, that things might be different if black babies’ lives mattered enough to bring more of them into the world and into stable, married families.. But Catelynn is blonde, you knew Catelynn back in the day, and Catelynn might be watching now. So, you muzzle yourself. In college, you told the professors what you knew they wanted to hear. Stupid games for stupid prizes, but how stupid could they be if you couldn’t be hired without the grades, the recommendations, the credentials? At every unpaid internship you took before finally getting the big kid job, you were on your best behavior, too. You attended the corporate “diversity” events. You let the rainbow stickers the office activists pasted to your cubicle in June stay up all year. You needed to blend in with nice, normal people. You thought your cool ambivalence played as professionalism. By the time the job finally came, you’d grown accustomed to your own silence. You’d come so far. Back then, you needed the nice, normal people to respect you, and the crazy ideologues to leave you alone. You imagined the squeaky wheel got the oil, and most people probably secretly found it as annoying as you did, but went along to get along, too. The noisy radicals in HR reminded you of that unpredictable, antisocial child on your little league team whose parents paid for the uniforms. They were to be tolerated, even as a source of ridicule behind the scenes. And you were a team player. If it ever became too much, someone would hit the brakes. Something has changed. Everyone’s email signature includes pronouns. Everyone’s LinkedIn is an homage to George Floyd. Silence is violence, said Catelynn, and the rest of the nice normies have risen up in chorus: mea culpa. We’re Not in Clown World Anymore This isn’t Clown World anymore. No one is laughing. No longer simply tolerated or patted on the head for his pretty lies, the child-tyrant is now an object of unceasing worship by nice normies. They kiss his boots. You were wrong for so long: normie obsequience had no real limit. Concession was bound neither by time nor reason. Concession was not tactical, strategic, or prudent. It was an artifact of the hollowing out of the mind—and soul! It strikes you that, when the child calls for your head, nice normies will deliver, smiling, and call it a “breakthrough.” The enemy has raised an army of your friends. You see it now, finally: nice normies are not centrists. They’re clones. They wear the uniform. They parrot every shibboleth. They have forgotten your name, and they have forgotten their own. You search fruitlessly for some sign of life within the totalitarian sameness of the normie bloc. Some spark in the eye, some twitch of the cheek. But their thousand-yard stares are fixed on promotion. March along, comrade. Choose to obey. Hell is mundane and mendacious. Follow the rules and achieve absolution. Say their words and save yourself. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa. Don’t cancel me. How did two weeks turn into six months? How did friends become enemies? Are you struggling to breathe again? Whose hands do you find wrapped around your neck? Who will deliver you? Your iPhone notifies you that your Doordash delivery has been carefully placed by your apartment’s entrance. This way, Western man. At least hell has take-out. Multidisciplinary Approach: Combating 5th Generation Warfare requires a multidisciplinary approach involving various sectors of society, including government, military, academia, media, and civil society. Collaborative efforts across these sectors can enhance effectiveness and resilience in countering this new form of warfare. 5th Gen Warfare Psyops Insiders Briefing Manipulate Domestic American News Media - https://rumble.com/v4g8bwr-5th-gen-warfare-psyops-insiders-briefing-manipulate-domestic-american-news-.html By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds. Welcome To Our Channel 3.2 Million+ Views So Far 2024 & 666 Video's So Far This Last Two Year - Thanks To Everyone Who Like Us... Good Or Bad You Are All Welcome To Share Any Video's We Post To Your Friends And Other's... Thanks ! What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. Note: We Do Not Post Any False Video's Or Un-True Content On This Channel & All Origins Video's And All Scientific Conspiracy Theory All Content And All Text Our True Statement From The Video's Owner's Who Posted There Video's To This Free Speech Channel By Us In The First Place To Be True ! Welcome To The New World Order - The Year Zero - The Real Origin of the World - National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. Thank You For Watching All Are Video's In 2024.

Real Illuminati Media CIA Operation Mockingbird Was A Covert U.S. Government Operation Run By The CIA To Implant Pro-US Propaganda In American Media And Front Organizations. Part 2 ! The greatest tool of control of the Illuminati is without a doubt the mainstream media, television and the entertainment industry. The Illuminati completely destroyed all morals in society worldwide by using puppet politicians, demonic Celebrities, and Media Puppets to achieve their goal of total mind control of the masses. Operation Mockingbird Ultimate TV Mind Control Documentary In 1948 Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects. Soon afterwards it was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC). This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency. Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on "propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world." Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic American media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry. Graham himself recruited others who had worked for military intelligence during the war. This included James Truitt, Russell Wiggins, Phil Geyelin, John Hayes and Alan Barth. Others like Stewart Alsop, Joseph Alsop and James Reston, were recruited from within the Georgetown Set. According to Deborah Davis, the author of Katharine the Great (1979) : "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles." In 1951 Allen W. Dulles persuaded Cord Meyer to join the CIA. However, there is evidence that he was recruited several years earlier and had been spying on the liberal organizations he had been a member of in the later 1940s. According to Deborah Davis, Meyer became Mockingbird's "principal operative". One of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), C. D. Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), Walter Winchell (New York Daily Mirror), Drew Pearson, Walter Lippmann, William Allen White, Edgar Ansel Mowrer (Chicago Daily News), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Whitelaw Reid (New York Herald Tribune), Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star), William C. Baggs (Miami News), Herb Gold (Miami News) and Charles L. Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh, the author of A Very Private Woman, (1998) these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work. After 1953 the network was overseen by Allen W. Dulles, director of the Central Intelligence Agency. By this time Operation Mockingbird had a major influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies. These organizations were run by people such as William Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time Magazine and Life Magazine), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (New York Times), Helen Rogers Reid (New York Herald Tribune), Dorothy Schiff (New York Post), Alfred Friendly (managing editor of the Washington Post), Barry Bingham (Louisville Courier-Journal) and James S. Copley (Copley News Services). The Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) was funded by siphoning of funds intended for the Marshall Plan. Some of this money was used to bribe journalists and publishers. Frank Wisner was constantly looked for ways to help convince the public of the dangers of communism. In 1954 Wisner arranged for the funding the Hollywood production of Animal Farm, the animated allegory based on the book written by George Orwell. According to Alex Constantine (Mockingbird: The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA), in the 1950s, "some 3,000 salaried and contract CIA employees were eventually engaged in propaganda efforts". Wisner was also able to restrict newspapers from reporting about certain events. For example, the CIA plots to overthrow the governments of Iran and Guatemala. Henry Luce, the owner of a large media empire, became a key figure in Operation Mockingbird. David Halberstam has pointed out in The Powers That Be (1979): "Luce's politics hardened in the postwar years and Time had become increasingly Republican in its tone. He had been stunned by Truman's defeat of Dewey in 1948. Then in the fall of 1949 China had fallen, the Democratic administration had failed to save Chiang, and that was too much; Truman, and even more Acheson, would have to pay the price. Time was now committed and politicized, an almost totally partisan instrument. The smell of blood was in the air. There was a hunger now in Luce to put a Republican back in power. It was as if Luce, between elections, stood as the leader of the opposition, a kingmaker who had failed to produce a king. The fall of China and the rise of a post-war anti-Communist mood had produced the essential issue to use against the Democrats: softness on Communism." Luce used his magazines to get Dwight D. Eisenhower elected as president. In 1953 Eisenhower appointed Clare Booth Luce ambassador to Italy; the first American woman ambassador to a major country. Claudio Accogli, a Italian historian, argues that luce was heavily involved in covert anti-communist activities with local cia personnel. Larry Hancock adds: "With no-holds barred political activism and heavy spending (including the support of the SIFAR/Italian Army Secret Service), Luce and the CIA managed to block the probable takeover of the center-left governments, an alliance between Christian Democrats (DC) and the Socialist Democratic Party (PSI)." Jonathan P. Herzog, the author of The Spiritual-Industrial Complex: America's Religious Battle Against Communism in the Early Cold War (2011), has argued that Luce was motivated by his religious faith: "While he counted anti-Communists like Mundt, Cardinal Spellman, and Chambers as allies, he viewed the Communist threat differently. In his view, it was a symptom and not a disease. Like his wife, Clare, he understood faith as a psychological imperative sought by all people. If religious faith waned, other dogmas would take its place. The success of Communism, then, was not attributable to its message but rather to the fact that it offered people the spiritual certainty they no longer found in Christianity. All the shocking anti-Communist propaganda and shopworn tributes to democracy that America could muster would fail to arrest the Marxian surge. But if Americans filled the spiritual vacuum, if they made religious faith commensurate with military and economic power, then Communism would dissipate." Warren Hinckle has argued: "Henry Luce believed that a morally slanted press was a responsible press... Life, the flagship picture book of the Luce fleet, afforded photojournalism some of its finest moments, while the text accompanying the pictures that were worth thousands of words was slanted with an ideological warp sufficient to stir Caxton in his grave." The cartoonist, Herbert Block, was equally critical: "Luce's unique contribution to American journalism... is that he placed into the hands of the people yesterday's newspaper and today's garbage homogenized into one neat package. (If you are enjoying this article, please feel free to share. You can follow John Simkin on Twitter and Google+ or subscribe to our monthly newsletter.) Thomas Braden, head of the of International Organizations Division (IOD), played an important role in Operation Mockingbird. Many years later he revealed his role in these events: "If the director of CIA wanted to extend a present, say, to someone in Europe - a Labour leader - suppose he just thought, This man can use fifty thousand dollars, he's working well and doing a good job - he could hand it to him and never have to account to anybody... There was simply no limit to the money it could spend and no limit to the people it could hire and no limit to the activities it could decide were necessary to conduct the war - the secret war.... It was a multinational. Maybe it was one of the first. Journalists were a target, labor unions a particular target - that was one of the activities in which the communists spent the most money." In August, 1952, the Office of Policy Coordination and the Office of Special Operations (the espionage division) were merged to form the Directorate of Plans (DPP). Frank Wisner became head of this new organization and Richard Helms became his chief of operations. Mockingbird was now the responsibility of the DPP. J. Edgar Hoover became jealous of the CIA's growing power. He described the OPC as "Wisner's gang of weirdos" and began carrying out investigations into their past. It did not take him long to discover that some of them had been active in left-wing politics in the 1930s. This information was passed to who started making attacks on members of the OPC. Hoover also gave McCarthy details of an affair that Frank Wisner had with Princess Caradja in Romania during the war. Hoover, claimed that Caradja was a Soviet agent. Joseph McCarthy also began accusing other senior members of the CIA as being security risks. McCarthy claimed that the CIA was a "sinkhole of communists" and claimed he intended to root out a hundred of them. One of his first targets was Cord Meyer, who was still working for Operation Mockingbird. In August, 1953, Richard Helms, Wisner's deputy at the OPC, told Meyer that Joseph McCarthy had accused him of being a communist. The Federal Bureau of Investigation added to the smear by announcing it was unwilling to give Meyer "security clearance". However, the FBI refused to explain what evidence they had against Meyer. Allen W. Dulles and both came to his defence and refused to permit a FBI interrogation of Meyer. Joseph McCarthy did not realise what he was taking on. Wisner unleashed Mockingbird on McCarthy. Drew Pearson, Joe Alsop, Jack Anderson, Walter Lippmann and Ed Murrow all went into attack mode and McCarthy was permanently damaged by the press coverage orchestrated by Wisner. Mockingbird was very active during the overthrow of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala. People like Henry Luce was able to censor stories that appeared too sympathetic towards the plight of Arbenz. Allen W. Dulles was even able to keep left-wing journalists from travelling to Guatemala. This including Sydney Gruson of the New York Times. Frank Wisner was also interested in influencing Hollywood. As Hugh Wilford points out in The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America (2008): “Fortunately for the CIA, two factors predisposed the major Hollywood studios that dominated the industry to take a responsible position in the cultural Cold War. One was a strong tendency toward self-censorship, the result of many years' experience avoiding the commercially disastrous effects of giving offense to either domestic pressure groups like the American Legion or foreign audiences. The other was the fact that the men who ran the studios were intensely patriotic and anticommunist - they saw it as their duty to help their government defeat the Soviet threat." Frank Wisner was helped by the fact that the House of Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), chaired by J. Parnell Thomas, was carrying out an investigation into the Hollywood Motion Picture Industry. The HUAC interviewed 41 people who were working in Hollywood. These people attended voluntarily and became known as "friendly witnesses". During their interviews they named nineteen people who they accused of holding left-wing views. One of those named, Bertolt Brecht, a playwright, gave evidence and then left for East Germany. Ten others: Herbert Biberman, Lester Cole, Albert Maltz, Adrian Scott, Samuel Ornitz, Dalton Trumbo, Edward Dmytryk, Ring Lardner Jr., John Howard Lawson and Alvah Bessie refused to answer any questions and were sent to prison and were blacklisted from the industry. The CIA and FBI also provided right-wing television producer, Vincent Harnett, with information about left-wing figures in the industry. In June 1950 Harnett published Red Channels, a pamphlet listing the names of 151 writers, directors and performers who they claimed had been members of subversive organisations before the Second World War but had not so far been blacklisted. Lee J. Cobb was one of those actors who was originally blacklisted but eventually cooperated with the HUAC: “When the facilities of the government of the United States are drawn on an individual it can be terrifying. The blacklist is just the opening gambit - being deprived of work. Your passport is confiscated. That's minor. But not being able to move without being tailed is something else. After a certain point it grows to implied as well as articulated threats, and people succumb. My wife did, and she was institutionalized. In 1953 the HCUA did a deal with me. I was pretty much worn down. I had no money. I couldn't borrow. I had the expenses of taking care of the children. Why am I subjecting my loved ones to this? If it's worth dying for, and I am just as idealistic as the next fellow. But I decided it wasn't worth dying for, and if this gesture was the way of getting out of the penitentiary I'd do it. I had to be employable again.” According to Frances Stonor Saunders, the author of Who Paid the Piper? (2000), Frank Wisner recruited several important figures for Operation Mockingbird. This included former OSS filmmaker John Ford and studio bosses Cecil B. DeMille (Paramount Pictures) and Darryl Zanuck (Twentieth Century-Fox). Another important figure in this group was Howard Hughes, the boss of RKO Pictures. As Charles Higham points out in Howard Hughes: The Secret Life (2004), this was also good for business: “Hughes’s crusade against Communism” was “exacerbated by his desire to have Hughes Aircraft profit from the Korean and any future anti-Soviet wars”. For example, in June 1950, General Ira Eaker "signed an across-the-board agreement giving Hughes a monopoly in interceptors for the U.S. Air Force… despite the fact that it was in breach of the Sherman anti-monopolies act… By the end of 1950, the war had made Hughes even richer than before.” Another important figure in this conspiracy was C. D. Jackson. He had joined the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) in 1943. The following year he was appointed Deputy Chief at the Psychological Warfare Division at Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF). After the war, he became Managing Director of Time-Life International. When it became clear that Dwight D. Eisenhower stood a good chance of becoming president, the CIA arranged for Jackson to join his campaign. This involved Jackson writing speeches for Eisenhower. Jackson was rewarded in February 1953 by being appointed as Special Assistant to the President. This included the role of Eisenhower's liaison between the CIA and the Pentagon. According to the Eisenhower Presidential Library files in Abilene, Kansas, Jackson's "area responsibility was loosely defined as international affairs, cold war planning, and psychological warfare. His main function was the coordination of activities aimed at interpreting world situations to the best advantage of the United States and her allies and exploiting incidents which reflected negatively on the Soviet Union , Communist China and other enemies in the Cold War." Jackson was also involved in Operation Mockingbird. This was revealed after the death of Jackson. On December 15, 1971, Mrs. C.D. Jackson gave her husband’s papers to the Dwight D. Eisenhower Library. This included details that Jackson was in contact with a CIA agent in Hollywood's Paramount Studios. The agent is not named by Jackson but Frances Stonor Saunders claims in Who Paid the Piper? (2000) that it was Carleton Alsop, a CIA agent employed by Frank Wisner. There is no doubt that Alsop was one of the CIA agents working at Paramount. However, Hugh Wilford argues in The Mighty Wurlitzer: How the CIA Played America (2008) that it was a senior executive at Paramount, Lugi G. Laraschi, was the most important CIA figure at the studio. Laraschi was the head of foreign and domestic censorship at the studio, whose job was to "iron out any political, moral or religious problems". Other studios, including MGM and RKO, had similar officers, and were probably CIA placements. In a private letter to Sherman Adams, Jackson claims the role of these CIA placements was "to insert in their scripts and in their action the right ideas with the proper subtlety". Although the main objective of Operation Mockingbird was to influence the production of commercial films the CIA also occasionally initiated film projects. The best documented instance of this concerns an animated version of Animal Farm, a satirical allegory about Stalinism by George Orwell. The book was highly popular when it was published in 1945 and it was only natural that the studios should be interested in making a film of the book. The problem for the CIA was that Orwell was a socialist whose book attacked both communism and capitalism. Therefore, it was important to make a film that restricted it to a condemnation of Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union. In 1950 Wisner’s OPC arranged for Joe Bryan to recruit anti-communist documentary-maker Louis de Rochemont to produce a movie version of the tale. It was decided to get the film made in Britain to disguise CIA involvement in the project. Rochemont employed the British animation studio of husband and wife John Halas and Joy Batchelor to make the film. Most of the funding came from a CIA shell corporation, Touchstone. E. Howard Hunt was one of those agents involved in the production of the film whose role was to remove the socialist elements in Orwell’s allegory. One unnamed member of the OPC sent a letter to John Halas called for the addition of scenes showing the other farms (that represented capitalist countries) in a more flattering light. The most important demand was to change the ending of Animal Farm. The CIA did not like the scene where the pigs and dogs face a liberation-style uprising of the other animals. The letter included the following: “It is reasonable to expect that if Orwell were to write the book today, it would be considerably different and that the changes would tend to make it even more positively anti-Communist and possibly somewhat more favorable to the Western powers.” One of the main concerns of the CIA was the portrayal of race-relations in Hollywood movies. It was argued that the left was using this issue to undermine the idea that America was a democracy based on equal rights. Letters from Jackson sent to the producers of films called for scenes showing African Americans mixing on equal terms with whites. One of Jackson’s proposals involved “planting black spectators in a crowd watching a golf game in the Martin and Lewis comedy The Caddy”. In 1955 Graham Greene published The Quiet American. The novel is set in Vietnam and involves the relationship between Thomas Fowler and Alden Pyle. Fowler is a veteran British journalist in his fifties, who has been covering the war in Vietnam for over two years. Pyle, the “Quiet American” of the title, is officially an aid worker, but is really employed by the CIA. It is believed that the Pyle character is partly based on that of Edward Lansdale. Greene had worked for the British Secret Service during the Second World War. Although a fairly successful novelist at the time, Greene was also employed by The Times and Le Figaro as a journalist. Between 1951 to 1954 spent a long period of time in Saigon. In 1953 Lansdale became a CIA advisor on special counter-guerrilla operations to French forces against the Viet Minh. While it is true that Graham Greene admitted that he never had the "misfortune to meet" Lansdale, the two men did know a lot about each other. Lansdale recalls that in 1954 he had dinner with Peg and Tilman Durdin at the Continental Hotel in Saigon. Greene was also there having a meal with several French officers. Lansdale claims that after he and the Durdins were leaving, Greene said something in French to his companions and the men began booing him. Lansdale definitely thought that Pyle was based on him. He told Cecil B. Currey on 15th February, 1984: "Pyle was close to Trinh Minh Thé, the guerrilla leader, and also had a dog that went with him everywhere - and I was the only American close to Trinh Minh Thé and my poodle Pierre went everything with me." In the book Pyle is sent to Vietnam by his government, ostensibly as a member of the American Economic Mission, but that assignment was only a cover for his real role as a CIA agent. According to one critic "Pyle was the embodiment of well-meaning American-style politics, and he blundered through the intrigue, treachery, and confusion of Vietnamese politics, leaving a trail of blood and suffering behind him." As Fowler points out in the novel, Pyle was attempting to "win the East for Democracy". However, according to Fowler, what the people of Vietnam really wanted was "enough rice" to eat. What is more: "They don't want to be shot at. They want one day to be much the same as another. They don't want our white skins around telling them what they want." When the book was published in the United States in 1956 it was condemned as anti-American. Pyle (Lansdale) is portrayed as someone whose belief in the justice of American foreign policy allows him to ignore the appalling consequences of his actions. It was criticized by The New Yorker for portraying Americans as murderers. The director, producer and screenwriter, Joseph L. Mankiewicz was chosen to make the film of The Quiet American. He visited Saigon in 1956 and was introduced to Edward Lansdale, whose cover was working at the International Rescue Committee’s office. The most controversial scene in the book is the bombing of a Saigon square in 1952 by a Vietnamese associate of Lansdale’s, General Trinh Minh Thé. In the novel, Greene suggests that Pyle/Lansdale, was behind the bombing. Lansdale suggested to Mankiewicz that the film should show that the bombing was “actually having been a Communist action”. When he returned home Mankiewicz wrote to John O’Daniel, the chairman of the American Friends of Vietnam that he intended to completely change the anti-American attitude of Greene’s book. This included the casting of Second World War hero, Audie Murphy, as Alden Pyle. In a letter that Edward Lansdale wrote to Ngo Dinh Diem he praised Mankiewicz’s treatment of the story as “an excellent change from Mr. Greene’s novel of despair” and “that it will help win more friends for you and Vietnam in many places in the world where it is shown." As Hugh Wilford pointed out: “It was a brilliantly devious maneuver of postmodern literary complexity: by helping to rewrite a story featuring a character reputedly based on himself, Lansdale had transformed an anti-American tract into a cinematic apology for U.S. policy - and his own actions-in Vietnam.” Graham Greene was furious with Mankiewicz’s treatment of his novel. "Far was it from my mind, when I wrote The Quiet American that the book would become a source of spiritual profit to one of the most corrupt governments in Southeast Asia." In 1955 President Dwight Eisenhower established the 5412 Committee in order to keep a check on the CIA's covert activities. The committee (also called the Special Group) included the CIA director, the national security adviser, and the deputy secretaries at State and Defence and had the responsibility to decide whether covert actions were "proper" and in the national interest. It was also decided to include Richard B. Russell, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. However, as Allen W. Dulles was later to admit, because of "plausible deniability" planned covert actions were not referred to the 5412 Committee. Dwight Eisenhower became concerned about CIA covert activities and in 1956 appointed David Bruce as a member of the President's Board of Consultants on Foreign Intelligence Activities (PBCFIA). Eisenhower asked Bruce to write a report on the CIA. It was presented to Eisenhower on 20th December, 1956. Bruce argued that the CIA's covert actions were "responsible in great measure for stirring up the turmoil and raising the doubts about us that exists in many countries in the world today." Bruce was also highly critical of Mockingbird. He argued: "what right have we to go barging around in other countries buying newspapers and handling money to opposition parties or supporting a candidate for this, that, or the other office." After Richard Bissell lost his post as Director of Plans in 1962, Tracy Barnes took over the running of Mockingbird. According to Evan Thomas (The Very Best Men) Barnes planted editorials about political candidates who were regarded as pro-CIA. It has been argued by Larry Hancock, the author of Someone Would Have Talked (2006), that Virginia Prewett was a close associate of David Attlee Phillips and was involved in promoting the activities of Alpha 66, led by Antonio Veciana: "Virginia Prewett appears to have been one of Phillips' significant media contacts and certainly one of the most consistent sources of media coverage for Alpha 66 activities. The other major source was Life magazine, part of the Luce Media family managed by Claire Booth Luce's husband Henry Robinson "Harry" Luce (a member of the Citizens Committee to Free Cuba, along with Phillips' friends Hal Hendrix and Paul Bethel). Articles by Prewitt and editorials by Time-Life provided the strongest challenge to the Kennedy position on Cuba and were quite consistent with the type of embarrass and back-to-the wall agendas Veciana attributed to Maurice Bishop." In September, 1963, Hal Hendrix joined Scripps-Howard News Service as a Latin American specialist. Instead of moving to Washington he remained in Miami "where his contacts were". In an article on 24th September, 1963, Hendrix was able to describe and justify the coup that overthrew Juan Bosch, the president of Dominican Republic. The only problem was the coup took place on the 25th September. Some journalists claimed that Hendrix must have got this information from the CIA. A few hours after John F. Kennedy had been killed, Hendrix provided background information to a colleague, Seth Kantor, about Lee Harvey Oswald. This included details of his defection to the Soviet Union and his work for the Fair Play for Cuba Committee. This surprised Kantor because he had this information before it was released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation later that evening. William E. Kelly later explained: "Seith Kantor, a local Dallas reporter who was in the Press Bus in the motorcade, knew something was wrong as they rode through Dealey Plaza, but the bus driver refused to follow the rest of the motorcade to Parkland Hospital and instead drove to their original destination, the Dallas Trade Mart. Once there however, Kantor got a ride to Parkand Hospital, where he interviewed a number of local Dallas officials and had a brief conversation with Jack Ruby, who had frequently fed Kantor interesting leads he developed into feature articles. While the Warren Commission rejected Kantor’s sworn testimony that Ruby was at Parkland, Kantor did make some phone calls, including one to his editor at the Scripps-Howard News Service (SHNS), and there are records of these calls. Years later, in 1975, Kantor learned that the records of one of the phone calls on that day was classified for reasons of national security, so he filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and obtained them to find out the big secret. He discovered that after taking to his editor, he was told to call another SHNS correspondent in Florida, Harold "Hal" Hendrix. From Florida, Hendrix supplied Kantor with detailed background information on Lee Harvey Oswald, who had just been arrested and named as the chief suspect in the assassination. Hendrix had more information in Florida than Kantor did at the scene of the crime, and we later learn why Kantor’s call to Hendrix was considered worthy of being classified for reasons of national security." When John F. Kennedy was assassinated, Charles Douglas Jackson purchased the Zapruder Film on behalf of Henry Luce. The author, David Lifton, points out in The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2004) that: "Abraham Zapruder in fact sold the film to Time-Life for the sum of $150,000 - about $900,000 dollars in today's money... Moreover, although Life had a copy of the film, it did little to maximize the return on its extraordinary investment. Specifically, it did not sell this unique property - as a film - to any broadcast media or permit it to be seen in motion, the logical way to maximize the financial return on its investment... A closer look revealed something else. The film wasn't just sold to Life - the person whose name was on the agreement was C. D. Jackson." Luce published individual frames of Zapruder's film but did not allow the film to be screened in its entirety. Soon after the assassination Charles Douglas Jackson also successfully negotiated with Marina Oswald the exclusive rights to her story. Peter Dale Scott argues in his book Deep Politics and the Death of JFK (1996) that Jackson, on the urging of Allen Dulles, employed Isaac Don Levine, a veteran CIA publicist, to ghost-write Marina's story. This story never appeared in print. In 1963, John McCone, the director of the CIA, discovered that Random House intended to publish Invisible Government by David Wise and Thomas Ross. McCone discovered that the book intended to look at his links with the Military Industrial Congress Complex. The authors also claimed that the CIA was having a major influence on American foreign policy. This included the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran (1953) and Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala (1954). The book also covered the role that the CIA played in the Bay of Pigs operation, the attempts to remove President Sukarno in Indonesia and the covert operations taking place in Laos and Vietnam. McCone called in Wise and Ross to demand deletions on the basis of galleys the CIA had secretly obtained from Random House. The authors refused to made these changes and Random House decided to go ahead and publish the book. The CIA considered buying up the entire printing of Invisible Government but this idea was rejected when Random House pointed out that if this happened they would have to print a second edition. McCone now formed a special group to deal with the book and tried to arrange for it to get bad reviews. It was the first full account of America's intelligence and espionage apparatus. In the book Wise and Ross argued that the "Invisible Government is made up of many agencies and people, including the intelligence branches of the State and Defense Departments, of the Army, Navy and Air Force". However, they claimed that the most important organization involved in this process was the CIA. John McCone also attempted to stop Edward Yates from making a documentary on the CIA for the National Broadcasting Company (NBC). This attempt at censorship failed and NBC went ahead and broadcast this critical documentary. In June, 1965, Desmond FitzGerald was appointed as head of the Directorate for Plans. He now took charge of Mockingbird. At the end of 1966 FitzGerald discovered that Ramparts, a left-wing publication, was planning to publish that the CIA had been secretly funding the National Student Association. FitzGerald ordered Edgar Applewhite to organize a campaign against the magazine. Applewhite later told Evan Thomas for his book, The Very Best Men: "I had all sorts of dirty tricks to hurt their circulation and financing. The people running Ramparts were vulnerable to blackmail. We had awful things in mind, some of which we carried off." This dirty tricks campaign failed to stop Ramparts publishing this story in March, 1967. The article, written by Sol Stern, was entitled NSA and the CIA. As well as reporting CIA funding of the National Student Association it exposed the whole system of anti-Communist front organizations in Europe, Asia, and South America. It named Cord Meyer as a key figure in this campaign. This included the funding of the literary journal Encounter. In May 1967 Thomas Braden responded to this by publishing an article entitled, I'm Glad the CIA is Immoral, in the Saturday Evening Post, where he defended the activities of the International Organizations Division unit of the CIA. Braden also confessed that the activities of the CIA had to be kept secret from Congress. As he pointed out in the article: "In the early 1950s, when the cold war was really hot, the idea that Congress would have approved many of our projects was about as likely as the John Birch Society's approving Medicare." Meyer's role in Operation Mockingbird was further exposed in 1972 when he was accused of interfering with the publication of a book, The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia by Alfred W. McCoy. The book was highly critical of the CIA's dealings with the drug traffic in Southeast Asia. The publisher, who leaked the story, had been a former colleague of Meyer's when he was a liberal activist after the war. Further details of Operation Mockingbird was revealed as a result of the Frank Church investigations (Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities) in 1975. According to the Congress report published in 1976: "The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets." Church argued that the cost of misinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year. Frank Church showed that it was CIA policy to use clandestine handling of journalists and authors to get information published initially in the foreign media in order to get it disseminated in the United States. Church quotes from one document written by the Chief of the Covert Action Staff on how this process worked (page 193). For example, he writes: “Get books published or distributed abroad without revealing any U.S. influence, by covertly subsidizing foreign publicans or booksellers.” Later in the document he writes: “Get books published for operational reasons, regardless of commercial viability”. Church goes onto report that “over a thousand books were produced, subsidized or sponsored by the CIA before the end of 1967”. All these books eventually found their way into the American market-place. Either in their original form (Church gives the example of the Penkovskiy Papers) or repackaged as articles for American newspapers and magazines. In another document published in 1961 the Chief of the Agency’s propaganda unit wrote: “The advantage of our direct contact with the author is that we can acquaint him in great detail with our intentions; that we can provide him with whatever material we want him to include and that we can check the manuscript at every stage… (the Agency) must make sure the actual manuscript will correspond with our operational and propagandistic intention.” Church quotes Thomas H. Karamessines as saying: “If you plant an article in some paper overseas, and it is a hard-hitting article, or a revelation, there is no way of guaranteeing that it is not going to be picked up and published by the Associated Press in this country” (page 198). By analyzing CIA documents Church was able to identify over 50 U.S. journalists who were employed directly by the Agency. He was aware that there were a lot more who enjoyed a very close relationship with the CIA who were “being paid regularly for their services, to those who receive only occasional gifts and reimbursements from the CIA” (page 195). Church pointed out that this was probably only the tip of the iceberg because the CIA refused to “provide the names of its media agents or the names of media organizations with which they are connected” (page 195). Church was also aware that most of these payments were not documented. This was the main point of the Otis Pike Report. If these payments were not documented and accounted for, there must be a strong possibility of financial corruption taking place. This includes the large commercial contracts that the CIA was responsible for distributing. Pike’s report actually highlighted in 1976 what eventually emerged in the 1980s via the activities of CIA operatives such as Edwin Wilson, Thomas Clines, Ted Shackley, Raphael Quintero, Richard Secord and Felix Rodriguez. Church also identified E. Howard Hunt as an important figure in Operation Mockingbird. He points out how Hunt arranged for books to be reviewed by certain writers in the national press. He gives the example of how Hunt arranged for a “CIA writer under contract” to write a hostile review of a Edgar Snow book in the New York Times (page 198). Church comes up with this conclusion to his examination of this issue: “In examining the CIA’s past and present use of the U.S. media, the Committee finds two reasons for concern. The first is the potential, inherent in covert media operations, for manipulating or incidentally misleading the American public. The second is the damage to the credibility and independence of a free press which may be caused by covert relationships with the U.S. journalists and media organizations.” In February, 1976, George Bush, the recently appointed Director of the CIA announced a new policy: “Effective immediately, the CIA will not enter into any paid or contract relationship with any full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.” However, he added that the CIA would continue to “welcome” the voluntary, unpaid cooperation of journalists. Carl Bernstein, who had worked with Bob Woodward in the investigation of Watergate, provided further information about Operation Mockingbird in an article in The Rolling Stone in October, 1977. Bernstein claimed that over a 25 year period over 400 American journalists secretly carried out assignments for the CIA: "Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested it the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad." It is almost certain that Bernstein had encountered Operation Mockingbird while working on his Watergate investigation. For example, Deborah Davis (Katharine the Great) has argued that Deep Throat was senior CIA official, Richard Ober, who was running Operation Chaos for Richard Nixon during this period. On 18th September, 1976, Orlando Letelier, who served as foreign minister under Salvador Allende, was traveling to work at the Institute of Policy Studies in Washington when a bomb was ignited under his car. Letelier and Ronni Moffitt, a 25 year old woman who was campaigning for democracy in Chile, both died of their injuries. According to Gaeton Fonzi, the author of The Last Investigation (1993), Virginia Prewett, who was working for the Council for Inter-American Security, a right-wing think tank, attacked the journalists who assumed that Chilean generals were involved in murdering Letelier. "She, too, suggested that Letelier may have been sacrificed by leftists to turn world opinion and U.S. policy against the Pinochet regime." According to researchers such as Steve Kangas, Angus Mackenzie and Alex Constantine, Operation Mockingbird was not closed down by the CIA in 1976. For example, in 1998 Kangas argued that CIA asset Richard Mellon Scaife ran "Forum World Features, a foreign news service used as a front to disseminate CIA propaganda around the world." On 8th February, 1999, Kangas was found dead in the bathroom of the Pittsburgh offices of Scaife. He had been shot in the head. Officially he had committed suicide but some people believe he was murdered. In an article in Salon Magazine, (19th March, 1999) Andrew Leonard asked: "Why did the police report say the gun wound was to the left of his head, while the autopsy reported a wound on the roof of his mouth? Why had the hard drive on his computer been erased shortly after his death? Why had Scaife assigned his No. 1 private detective, Rex Armistead, to look into Kangas' past? In January 2005, I wrote an article entitled Operation Mockingbird. At that time very little was known about this highly secret Central Intelligence Agency media operation that dated back to 1948 when Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects. Soon afterwards it was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC). This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the CIA. Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on "propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements in threatened countries of the free world." Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic American media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham, the publisher of the Washington Post, to run the project within the industry. Graham himself recruited others who had worked for military intelligence during the war. This included James Truitt, Russell Wiggins, Phil Geyelin, John Hayes and Alan Barth. Others like Stewart Alsop, Joseph Alsop and James Reston, were recruited from within the Georgetown Set. According to Deborah Davis, the author of Katharine the Great (1979): "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles." One of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), C. D. Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), Walter Winchell (New York Daily Mirror), Drew Pearson, Walter Lippmann, William Allen White, Edgar Ansel Mowrer (Chicago Daily News), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Whitelaw Reid (New York Herald Tribune), Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star), William C. Baggs (Miami News), Herb Gold (Miami News) and Charles L. Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh, the author of A Very Private Woman, (1998) these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work. Evidence for Operation Mockingbird first came from many different sources. Thomas Braden, head of the of the CIA's International Organizations Division (IOD), played an important role in Operation Mockingbird. In June, 1975, Braden gave an interview to the Granada Television program, World in Action: The Rise and Fall of the CIA. "If the director of CIA wanted to extend a present, say, to someone in Europe - a Labour leader - suppose he just thought, This man can use fifty thousand dollars, he's working well and doing a good job - he could hand it to him and never have to account to anybody... There was simply no limit to the money it could spend and no limit to the people it could hire and no limit to the activities it could decide were necessary to conduct the war - the secret war.... It was a multinational. Maybe it was one of the first. Journalists were a target, labor unions a particular target - that was one of the activities in which the communists spent the most money." In another interview Braden confessed that the activities of the CIA had to be kept secret from Congress. As he pointed out in the article: "In the early 1950s, when the cold war was really hot, the idea that Congress would have approved many of our projects was about as likely as the John Birch Society's approving Medicare." Further details of Operation Mockingbird was revealed as a result of the Frank Church investigations (Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities). According to the Congress report published in 1976: "The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets." Church argued that the cost of misinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year. Church showed that it was CIA policy to use clandestine handling of journalists and authors to get information published initially in the foreign media in order to get it disseminated in the United States. Church quotes from one document written by the Chief of the Covert Action Staff on how this process worked (page 193). For example, he writes: “Get books published or distributed abroad without revealing any U.S. influence, by covertly subsidizing foreign publicans or booksellers.” Later in the document he writes: “Get books published for operational reasons, regardless of commercial viability”. Church goes onto report that “over a thousand books were produced, subsidized or sponsored by the CIA before the end of 1967”. All these books eventually found their way into the American market-place. Either in their original form (Church gives the example of the Penkovskiy Papers) or repackaged as articles for American newspapers and magazines. In another document published in 1961 the Chief of the Agency’s propaganda unit wrote: “The advantage of our direct contact with the author is that we can acquaint him in great detail with our intentions; that we can provide him with whatever material we want him to include and that we can check the manuscript at every stage… (the Agency) must make sure the actual manuscript will correspond with our operational and propagandistic intention.” Church quotes Thomas H. Karamessines as saying: “If you plant an article in some paper overseas, and it is a hard-hitting article, or a revelation, there is no way of guaranteeing that it is not going to be picked up and published by the Associated Press in this country” (page 198). By analyzing CIA documents Church was able to identify over 50 U.S. journalists who were employed directly by the Agency. He was aware that there were a lot more who enjoyed a very close relationship with the CIA who were “being paid regularly for their services, to those who receive only occasional gifts and reimbursements from the CIA” (page 195). Church pointed out that this was probably only the tip of the iceberg because the CIA refused to “provide the names of its media agents or the names of media organizations with which they are connected”. Church was also aware that most of these payments were not documented. This was the main point of the Otis Pike Report. If these payments were not documented and accounted for, there must be a strong possibility of financial corruption taking place. This includes the large commercial contracts that the CIA was responsible for distributing. Pike’s report actually highlighted in 1976 what eventually emerged in the 1980s via the activities of CIA operatives such as Edwin Wilson, Thomas Clines, Ted Shackley, Raphael Quintero, Richard Secord and Felix Rodriguez. Carl Bernstein, who had worked with Bob Woodward in the investigation of Watergate, provided further information about Operation Mockingbird in an article in The Rolling Stone in October, 1977. Bernstein claimed that over a 25 year period over 400 American journalists secretly carried out assignments for the CIA: "Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors-without-portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested it the derring-do of the spy business as in filing articles, and, the smallest category, full-time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad." I published my article on Operation Mockingbird on the Spartacus Educational website in January 2005. I also posted my discoveries on the Education Forum. I then carried out a search for "Operation Mockingbird" at Google. First in the ranking was the Wikipedia entry. On 6th April, 2005, it said: “Operation Mockingbird is the name of a CIA project that may or may not have existed. It has been mentioned in several books and web sites, but its existence has not yet been determined. Some believe the operation is merely an urban legend or a conspiracy theory.” Clearly, the person who wrote this entry knew nothing about CIA operations. I therefore decided to edit the page. I therefore decided to write the entry for Operation Mockingbird on Wikipedia. However, as soon as I did this, it was deleted and the original entry was put back. My own page on Operation Mockingbird appeared in search-engines such as AltaVista, Yahoo and AlltheWeb. However, Google did not appear to have it in its database. This was surprising as at the time I was doing very well at Google from my other pages. In the past I have worked for national newspapers and I used my contacts to make inquiries about Google's relationship with the CIA. I posted information on the Education Forum and had letters published in the national press about the failings of Wikipedia. Eventually I was contacted by a representative of Wikipedia and I was told that if I gave full page references for my history of this CIA operation they would allow it to stand. On 14th June, 2005, I was able to announce that my page on Operation Mockingbird had been restored to the Google database. (It now appeared at 3rd place in the ranking). So also was my page on Frank Wisner, the man who established Mockingbird. Another person blocked, Mary Pinchot Meyer, was also back in. Recently, I had reason to do a search for "Operation Mockingbird". At Bing it came 2nd to Wikipedia. This was to be expected as it is the most detailed page on the web on the subject. In 7th place was the original debate we had about it on the Education Forum. However, I got quite a surprise, when I did the same thing at Google. It was on the third page in 22nd place. (The Education Forum was in 23rd place). Why has Google downgraded this page? I recently had an email from Bing stating: "For the second year, in blind tests, using the UK's most popular web searches, more people prefer Bing results than Google!" I am not surprised, it will be my default search-engine in future. The current Wikipedia entry is also disturbing. Although it still contains some of the material that I produced, it has removed all reference to my website. Another important change is the removal of most of the journalists I named who were working for America 's leading media organisations. It would seem that Operation Mockingbird is still in existence and is having an impact on online information. No one knows the name and academic credentials of the person who did the final edit. Google gives Wikipedia a domain authority of 100 (that is why it always appears at the top of the rankings). However, that is not true of teachers in schools and universities who refuse to accept references from Wikipedia as we have no idea who has written the material. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. Part 1 ! - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html https://fightingmonarch.com/2020/02/05/television-is-mind-control/ https://research.library.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=international_senior TV is Mind Control through Physiological and Psychological Manipulation Television is an anesthetic for the pain of the modern world” – Astrid Alauda - It’s estimated the average American, starting at the young ripe age of two years old, watches more than 34 hours of television per week, plus an additional 3 hours of recorded media. Corporate media is mostly funded by corporations. 75% of the commercial airtime is paid for by the 100 largest corporations in the USA, with budgets into the billions for some. Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter 13 questions about the clandestine secret society answered Who were the Illuminati, and do they really control the world? Here's what we know about one of history's most alluring secret societies, including how you became a member... What is the Illuminati? The Illuminati is a name given to both a real and fictitious society. When new content is created, it can attract or detract advertising and investment into the commercial side. If some content is not liked by a corporation that funds a majority of the television network, then chances are they are going to hand them a script of what to say to keep public opinion in their favor. Television is a private medium for new information to get out, where the corporations decide what commercials we see in between shows, and also get to influence what shows get to startup or continue on a network. The more we watch TV, the more we go into alpha brainwave states, the slow and receptive pattern that accepts images and suggestion into consciousness less critically. A state of hypnosis is induced by the alpha frequency, where you are content to just sit and continue watching. Going from the beta to an alpha wave state can affect how we feel, making it pleasurable to induce an alpha wave relaxed state and watching the TV, thereby making it addictive as a habit to “veg” out. Kicking the habit seems to be hard for many people to do. For some reason, they are drawn to spend time and pay attention to the TV. Television is a drug “Krugman monitored a person through many trials and found that in less than one minute of television viewing, the person’s brainwaves switched from Beta waves — brainwaves associated with active, logical thought — to primarily Alpha waves. When the subject stopped watching television and began reading a magazine, the brainwaves reverted to Beta waves.” We are in a lower mental state, less evaluative, less critical, less able to discern truth from falsity, reality from unreality. There are many ideas base don images we receive, that we would normally reject, or at least question, under normal conditions. Whereas with television this functionality is impaired. We are filled with both images of half truth and propaganda, but also images that distract and divert our attention from social realities of the world with banal, pointless, irrelevant, mind-numbing fodder and entertainment to keep us stimulated. One thing to note however, is that CRT (cathode ray tube) television technology operated differently than current LCD technology. The effect of light frequency transmission for alpha wave state increase may be different. How Television Works As real-life experience is increasingly replaced by the mediated ‘experience’ of television-viewing, it becomes easy for politicians and market-researchers of all sorts to rely on a base of mediated mass experience that can be evoked by appropriate triggers. The TV ‘world’ becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: the mass mind takes shape, its participants acting according to media-derived impulses and believing them to be their own personal volition arising out of their own desires and needs. In such a situation, whoever controls the screen controls the future, the past, and the present. “I know the secret of making the average American believing anything I want them to. Just let me control television. You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV sets images.” That is the science of imagery and the power of symbols invoked within our consciousness to influence our lives. Reality is being created for us through the beliefs we have in what other people tell us and what we see. Ever argue with the someone, present new information, yet they reject it by falling back on their blind trust on the “news”? The news said it, therefore it’s “true”. Not only can people lie to use to deceive us, but now technology is used to manipulate our trust in what they show us. The news media of puppets and liars have previously been exposed with their green screen fake news, and this is in 2024! The group of people who want to tout themselves as representatives of truth and “real news”, are in bed with the CIA, still mostly likely to this day. It’s offocial in the 50, 60, and 70s through a long running Operation Mockingbird to pay heads of major media companies to influence the minds of the public as propagandists and gatekeepers for the establishment. They manipulate data, twist and spin things to create narratives for people to accept about what is happening in reality. Here is Anderson Cooper with ties to the CIA. The intelligentsia work to promote a certain narrative, story or worldview for the masses to adopt as the way reality is. Here is a longer fake-news video from 2023. New World Order ideals behind it are not. These ideals have existed for centuries. However, in the 21st century, things have changed. While the masses were once completely oblivious about the agenda of the global elite, the information age has caused a mass awakening. Now, the plans of the occult elite are met with increasing resistance. This brings us to the reason the Guidestones were destroyed and their globalist message erased. In an age of misleading and confusing propaganda, the Guidestones were simply too clear, too concise, and too damning. The globalist elite’s true intentions — including world government, depopulation, and eugenics — were literally etched in stone, for all to see. This is why the Guidestones were torn down. The elite no longer want us to know about their long-term goals for humanity. Unelected global elites, led by Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum, are putting all of the Georgia Guidestones’ commandments into action. While the Guidestones are gone, the ten “commandments” or “guides” inscribed on the granite walls continue to shine a light on the dark deeds of the elite and explain their true agenda. It is important that we share this important information and wake up as many people as we possibly can. This is the only way to defeat those who wish to usher in a New World Order, with all that it entails. Here at The People’s Voice we will keep exposing the secret societies that run the world and document the agenda of the global elite. The creators of this monument have chosen to remain anonymous and the man who conveyed the instructions to the Eberton Granite Finishing Company 19 miles away used a pseudonym. Obviously it cost a pretty penny to produce and install. Purportedly the group behind this had spent twenty years in planning. The inscriptions are in the following languages: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Traditional Chinese, and Russian. The ten commandments inscribed there are as follows: 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. 2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. 4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason. 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. 9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite. 10. Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature. A lot of it sounds "nice" but one gets a little concerned about the first two, the first especially. I'm curious how they propose to reduce the earth's population by seven billion in order to fulfill their concept of balance with nature. Does the second statement refer to a return to eugenicists helping create a more perfect race? Is it Brave New World inspired, as if Huxley's book were a manual, instead of a red flag? The UN Agenda 2030, launched in 2015, aims to end poverty in all its forms and envision a world of universal respect for human rights and dignity, the rule of law, justice, equality, and non-discrimination. It is grounded in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and international human rights treaties and emphasizes the responsibilities of all states to respect, protect, and promote human rights. The Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity, and seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are an urgent call for action by all countries, developed and developing, in a global partnership, addressing global challenges related to poverty, inequality, climate change, environmental degradation, peace, and justice. Achieving the SDGs could open up US$12 trillion of market opportunities and create 380 million new jobs by 2030. UN Invasion, Martial Law, Rex 84 Death Camps, Globalist Purge, Operation Cable Splicer - https://rumble.com/v41h3zp-un-invasion-martial-law-rex-84-death-camps-globalist-purge-operation-cable-.html Guide To Understanding Globalist Purge FEMA Quarantine Re-Education Death Camp - https://rumble.com/v41deia-guide-to-understanding-globalist-purge-fema-quarantine-re-education-death-c.html Per U.S.A. Government Everyone Is A Criminal Confiscation All Property & All Assets - https://rumble.com/v3t6igt-per-u.s.a.-government-everyone-is-a-criminal-confiscation-all-property-and-.html World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda - https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html This Is UN 4G3NDA 21 Aw4reness Is The First Step In The R3SlST4NC3 By The People - https://rumble.com/v2yky8g-this-is-un-4g3nda-21-aw4reness-is-the-first-step-in-the-r3slst4nc3-by-the-p.html UN Report Calls For Decriminalization Of Sex Between Adults/Children Age 8+Up - https://rumble.com/v2qo62c-un-report-calls-for-decriminalization-of-sex-between-adultschildren-age-8-u.html UN New Legal Principles Launched On International Women’s and Trans Women Day to advance decriminalization efforts In March 2023, UNAIDS and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), along with the International Committee of Jurists (ICJ) published a group of "new legal principles" that would advance "decriminalization efforts" globally.

Have You Ever Heard Of 5th Generation Warfare? Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. An introduction to 5G-W The nature of warfare has been changing, with the emergence of new tactics and strategies that go beyond traditional military engagements. The concept of 5th Generation Warfare has been increasingly used to describe these non-conventional methods that involve a range of tactics, including psychological operations, disinformation campaigns, and cyber-attacks. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of 5th Generation Warfare, its historical and current examples, and the challenges it poses for security and stability in the world. It is important to note that this article does not take a political stance or endorse any particular ideology or nation. Instead, it is intended to be an educational resource that informs readers about the various tactics and strategies used in 5th Generation Warfare, and their potential impacts. By understanding the nature of 5th Generation Warfare and its evolving tactics, readers can gain a more nuanced and informed perspective on the contemporary geopolitical landscape. Each chapter will provide readers with a detailed analysis of the topic, including historical examples, current events, and potential future implications. The article will also include strategies for countering 5th Generation Warfare and protecting against its effects. Chapter I: 5th Generation warfare (5G-W) In recent years, there has been growing interest in the concept of 5th Generation Warfare (5G-W). This term has been used to describe a new form of warfare that is characterised by the use of non-traditional tactics, such as information operations, cyber attacks, and psychological warfare, to achieve strategic objectives. 5G-W is a complex and multifaceted concept that is still evolving, with ongoing debates about its definition and scope. Some experts define 5G-W as a type of conflict that is waged by non-state actors, while others view it as a broader phenomenon that encompasses state-level strategies as well. One of the defining features of 5G-W is its reliance on non-kinetic means of warfare, such as propaganda, disinformation, and social engineering. These tactics are used to influence the perceptions and behaviour of target populations, with the ultimate goal of achieving strategic objectives without resorting to traditional military force. Another key characteristic of 5G-W is its emphasis on asymmetric tactics and strategies. This means that 5G-W actors often seek to exploit vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the opponent’s defence, rather than engaging in direct combat. This can make it difficult for traditional military forces to detect and respond to 5G-W threats effectively. Despite its relatively recent emergence as a concept, 5G-W has already been identified as a major strategic challenge for modern militaries and governments. In order to understand and effectively counter 5G-W threats, it is important to have a clear understanding of its tactics, strategies, and objectives. However, it is important to note that not all modern warfare falls under the definition of 5G-W. Traditional kinetic warfare, such as conventional ground and air combat, still plays a significant role in military operations. The distinction between traditional and 5th generation warfare is important to understand when analysing contemporary conflicts and developing effective strategies for defence and security. Another aspect of 5G-W is the use of advanced technology to carry out non-kinetic attacks. For example, cyber attacks on critical infrastructure, including power grids and communication networks, can have a significant impact on a nation’s security and stability. Hackers and other malicious actors can exploit vulnerabilities in these systems, causing widespread disruption and chaos without ever firing a shot. Additionally, the use of social media and other online platforms has become a key element of 5G-W. Actors can use these platforms to spread disinformation and propaganda, sow discord and division, and even influence public opinion and political outcomes. One of the biggest challenges in countering 5G-W is the difficulty in identifying and attributing attacks. Because many of these tactics are carried out anonymously and remotely, it can be hard to determine who is behind them and how to respond effectively. As 5G-W continues to evolve and grow in importance, it is likely that governments and militaries will need to adapt their strategies and tactics to effectively counter this new form of warfare. This may involve a greater emphasis on cyber-security, information operations, and other non-kinetic means of defence. It may also require a new approach to international relations and diplomacy, as nations seek to mitigate the risks of 5G-W while still pursuing their strategic objectives. Despite the ongoing debates and controversies surrounding the concept of 5G-W, it is clear that this new form of warfare is becoming increasingly relevant in the modern world. As such, it is important for governments, militaries, and the general public to be aware of the potential risks and threats associated with 5G-W, as well as the strategies and tactics that can be used to counter these threats. Chapter II: The Power of Language in 5G-W The Impact of Language in Shaping Public Opinion Language is a powerful tool that can be used to shape and influence public opinion. The words and phrases we use can have a profound impact on how people perceive and understand the world around them. From political speeches to advertising slogans, language is used to convey ideas, promote products, and sway opinions. Throughout history, language has been used as a tool of manipulation and control. One of the most infamous examples of language manipulation is Nazi propaganda during the Holocaust. Adolf Hitler and his regime used language to dehumanise Jews and other groups, referring to them as vermin and parasites in order to justify their persecution and ultimately their genocide. Historical language manipulation was used by governments during wartime to dehumanise the enemy, and the use of euphemisms to make unpleasant or controversial actions seem more palatable to the public. Language manipulation is still prevalent in modern society, with political leaders and advertisers using language to sway public opinion. In political discourse, language is often used to demonise opponents and rally support for a particular agenda. Advertisers use language to make products seem more desirable and to create a sense of urgency to buy. Below are a few examples of 5G-W language manipulation techniques: Euphemisms and Framing: Politicians and interest groups often use euphemisms and framing techniques to shape public opinion. By choosing specific words or phrases, they can frame an issue or policy in a positive or negative light. For example, referring to budget cuts as “fiscal responsibility” or describing a controversial policy as “safeguarding individual welfare,” can influence how people perceive and react to the issue. Loaded Language and Name-calling: In political debates and public discourse, loaded language and name-calling are used to demean opponents or de-legitimise their viewpoints. Labelling someone as a “radical,” “extremist,” “socialist,” or “fascist” is a way to evoke emotional reactions and discredit their ideas without engaging in substantive arguments. This tactic is employed by various sides of the political spectrum to polarise and rally their base. It is essential to recognise that not everyone labelled as an “extremist” or “radical” truly espouses extreme beliefs. Loaded language can be employed to exaggerate or mis-characterise a person’s views, painting them with a broad brush based on limited information or intentional manipulation. This can be particularly problematic when it leads to unfair judgements and the marginalisation of individuals who may have nuanced perspectives. Dog Whistling: Dog whistling refers to the use of coded language that appeals to a specific group while maintaining plausible deniability to the wider audience. Politicians may employ subtle cues, symbols, or phrases that resonate with a particular demographic without explicitly stating their intentions. This form of language manipulation can exploit existing prejudices or biases and provoke emotional responses among targeted groups. Below are some examples of Dog Whistling: Class Struggle: The concept of “class struggle”. On the surface, it may seem like a call for workers to unite against oppression and fight for their rights. However, it often served as a dog whistle to incite hatred towards the bourgeoisie and promote the idea of a revolution to overthrow the existing social order. Equality and Social Justice: While these concepts can have positive connotations, they were historically used as dog whistles. Behind these seemingly benign ideas, leaders sought to consolidate power, suppress dissent, and impose a collectivist society that often resulted in authoritarian rule. Worker Solidarity: The idea of worker solidarity was also historically another common dog whistle used. While it may seem like a call for unity and empowerment of the working class, it was often used to promote an ideology, control labour movements, and suppress dissenting voices. By appealing to the struggles and aspirations of workers, governments could manipulate public sentiment and gain support for their revolutionary goals. Misinformation and Disinformation: The intentional spread of misinformation and disinformation through various channels, including social media, is a significant example of language manipulation. False or misleading information is crafted and disseminated to deceive the public, shape narratives, and influence political discourse. This manipulation tactic aims to sow confusion and create division. Spin and PR Techniques: Public relations (PR) professionals and political “spin doctors” employ language manipulation techniques to shape public perception of individuals, organisations, or events. Through carefully crafted press releases, media appearances, and messaging strategies, they aim to control the narrative, downplay negative information, and emphasise positive aspects to shape public opinion in a favourable direction. Framing Opposition, eg. “Anti-(Insert Value)”: Another common tactic in language manipulation is framing opposition against specific values. By labelling “dissenters” as “un-this” or “anti-that,” proponents seek to marginalise opposing viewpoints and discourage critical engagement. This tactic aims to create an “us vs them” mentality and suppress alternative perspectives. These examples illustrate the pervasive nature of language manipulation in contemporary discourse. It’s crucial to critically analyse and question the language used in various contexts to understand the underlying intentions and biases behind the messaging. However, language can also be used to inspire positive change and promote empathy and understanding. By using language that is inclusive and respectful, we can create a more tolerant and compassionate society. Are you still with me? … This is just heating up … Stay awake and read on :) Chapter III: Ideological Subversion and AI Ideological subversion is a method of undermining the existing system of government or social structure by infiltrating and manipulating key institutions, such as the media, education, and government. This method involves slowly changing the beliefs and values of the population over time, often through the use of propaganda and other forms of information warfare. Yuri Bezmenov, a former KGB agent, outlined a theory of ideological subversion in a series of interviews in the 1980s. He described a four-stage process that he claimed was used by the Soviet Union to undermine and destabilise targeted societies. These stages are: Demoralisation: According to Bezmenov, demoralisation is the first stage of ideological subversion, which involves the gradual erosion of societal values, norms, and moral foundations. The goal is to weaken the belief system of the targeted society and make it more susceptible to ideological manipulation. This stage can take years or even decades to achieve and is primarily achieved through propaganda, infiltration of educational institutions, and the promotion of moral relativism and cultural decay. Destabilisation: The destabilisation stage aims to create a sense of crisis and unrest within the targeted society. Bezmenov argued that this is done by promoting social and economic turmoil, exacerbating existing divisions, and undermining the functioning of institutions. The goal is to foster a state of chaos and make the population more receptive to radical change and alternative ideologies. Crisis: During the crisis stage, the targeted society experiences a period of intense turmoil, marked by political, social, and economic upheaval. Bezmenov suggested that the crisis is intentionally provoked or exploited to further destabilise the society and create a power vacuum. This stage often involves mass protests, violence, and a breakdown of law and order. *Normalisation: The final stage of ideological subversion is normalisation, where a new ideological framework is imposed to establish control over the destabilised society. Bezmenov argued that this involves the installation of a puppet regime or a new political system that aligns with the interests of the subverter. The new system is presented as a solution to the crisis, offering stability and promising a better future. The population may be subjected to censorship, repression, and restrictions on freedoms under the guise of maintaining order and protecting the “revolutionary” gains. In a future article we will explore the relationships of the following terms: *Normalisation, new normal and new world order. It’s important to note that while Bezmenov’s theory has gained some attention, it is also a subject of criticism and controversy. Some argue that his perspective may be overly simplistic and rooted in Cold War-era rhetoric. Nonetheless, understanding and critically evaluating the stages Bezmenov described can contribute to a broader analysis of ideological manipulation and societal influence. Watch the video for more context on Ideological subversion One of the most well-known examples of ideological subversion was the Soviet Union’s efforts to undermine Western democracies during the Cold War. The KGB, the Soviet intelligence agency, infiltrated and manipulated various institutions in the West, such as academia, the media, and political organisations, to spread Soviet propaganda and influence public opinion. Another example is the Chinese Communist Party’s current efforts to spread its influence and ideology beyond its borders through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative and Confucius Institutes. Lets now look at ideological subversion and technology in the modern era … Well, here is where it get’s interesting :) I had a conversation with AI about it … see a snippet of that chat below … Me — “Is ideological subversion a conspiracy theory or a real phenomenon?” ChatGPT — “Ideological subversion is a real phenomenon that has been studied and documented by various experts in the fields of psychology, sociology, and political science. It refers to the systematic efforts to manipulate and influence people’s beliefs, values, and worldview in order to achieve political or social goals. While the term “ideological subversion” may sometimes be used in a conspiratorial or exaggerated manner, the underlying concept and the potential dangers associated with it are widely recognised and studied in academic and professional settings” Me — “Could AI be ideologically subverted?” ChatGPT — “As an AI language model, I do not have personal beliefs or biases. However, it is possible that the data I am trained on, or the algorithms used to train me, may contain biases or ideological subversion. It is important for humans to continue to monitor and critically analyse information, including information provided by AI systems, to ensure accuracy and avoid ideological subversion” Me — “I get labelled as a conspiracy theorist for calling out ideological subversion, is that fair?” ChatGPT — ” It is not fair to label someone as a conspiracy theorist simply for expressing concerns about ideological subversion. However, it is important to distinguish between legitimate concerns about biased or inaccurate information and unfounded, baseless claims that are not supported by evidence. It is possible for some individuals to use accusations of ideological subversion as a way to discredit information or viewpoints they disagree with, without providing any evidence to support their claims. Therefore, it is important to approach these issues with critical thinking and careful analysis of the available evidence” Me — “What are the ramifications of ideological subversion through a technocratic system that implements AI to do its bidding?” ChatGPT — ” Ideological subversion through a technocratic system that implements AI could have significant ramifications. If the data and algorithms used to train the AI are ideologically subverted, the AI’s output could be biased and unreliable, leading to incorrect or harmful decisions being made. This could have serious consequences, particularly in areas such as healthcare, finance, and law enforcement. Furthermore, if the technocratic system is controlled by those with ideological biases, the AI could be used as a tool to perpetuate and amplify those biases, potentially leading to further polarisation and division in society. It’s important to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in an ethical and transparent manner, with rigorous testing and validation to ensure that it is not being used to promote ideological subversion or any other form of bias or discrimination” Me — “Final question, What if the flow of information has been ideologically subverted through a technocracy or oligarchy? involving the political system, education system, media, flow of information and all peer review organisations?” ChatGPT — “If the flow of information has been ideologically subverted through a technocracy or oligarchy, it can have significant ramifications on society. This is because information plays a crucial role in shaping people’s beliefs, values, and behaviours. If the information that people receive is ideologically subverted, it can lead to a distorted view of the world, which can have serious consequences. For example, if people are fed false or misleading information, it can lead to a lack of action on this critical issue. Similarly, if people are exposed to ideologically subverted information about a political candidate, it can influence their voting behaviour, leading to the election of an unfit leader. Furthermore, if the flow of information is ideologically subverted, it can lead to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and the marginalisation of dissenting voices. This can lead to a chilling effect on free speech and open debate, which is crucial for a healthy democracy. In the context of AI, if the data used to train AI models is ideologically subverted, it can lead to biased and discriminatory algorithms. This can have serious consequences in areas such as healthcare, criminal justice, and hiring practices, where AI is increasingly being used to make important decisions. Overall, the ramifications of ideological subversion through a technocratic system that implements AI to do its bidding can be far-reaching and profound, affecting nearly every aspect of society”. It is important to be aware of the methods and tactics used in ideological subversion, in order to safeguard against attempts to undermine the existing system of government or social structure … I will reserve a separate article to delve into the diverse range of ideologies that have shaped human history. Stay tuned for an upcoming piece that will shed light on the complexities of different ideologies and their role in shaping societies.” Such as: Democracy, Capitalism, Socialism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Fascism, Communism, Nationalism, Anarchism and much more … Yet, we must now move on to our next 5G-W chapter :) Chapter IV: Cultural Hegemony and Disinformation What is hegemony? Hegemony refers to the domination or leadership of one social group or nation over others, usually achieved through the use of power, persuasion, or cultural influence. The term was originally coined by the Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci to describe the ways in which ruling elites maintain their power and control over society through the use of ideology, culture, and institutions. In the context of cultural hegemony, the dominant group uses its cultural and ideological influence to shape the beliefs, values, and norms of society in ways that perpetuate its power and privilege. This can include the dissemination of propaganda and disinformation, the co-optation of oppositional movements or ideas, and the promotion of a particular worldview or way of life as natural or inevitable. Cultural Hegemony and Disinformation are important concepts in understanding 5th generation warfare. Cultural hegemony refers to the domination of a particular culture over others, while disinformation refers to the deliberate spread of false information to mislead and manipulate people. In this chapter, we will explore historical and current examples of cultural hegemony and disinformation. Throughout history, powerful empires have used cultural hegemony and disinformation to maintain their dominance over other cultures. The British Empire, for example, used cultural hegemony to spread their language, religion, and customs to the colonies they controlled. The empire also used disinformation to mislead the local population, such as spreading rumours about rebellious leaders to weaken their support. Similarly, during the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a cultural battle to spread their ideologies and values to other countries. This was known as the cultural Cold War, and both sides used propaganda and disinformation to shape public opinion and influence political decisions. In the modern era, cultural hegemony and disinformation are still prevalent. One example is the dominance of American culture in the global entertainment industry. American movies, TV shows, and music are popular worldwide, leading to concerns about the homogenisation of culture. Another example is the use of disinformation in political campaigns and international relations. Russia, for instance, has been accused of using disinformation campaigns to influence elections in other countries and to sow discord among their populations. Overall, cultural hegemony and disinformation are important tools in 5th generation warfare, and it is essential to recognise their use in modern conflicts. Yes … This leads on to the whole communism vs capitalism debate … we will explore this in a later article … for now lets try to keep on track … we are talking about 5G-W :) Chapter V: Social Engineering Definition of Social Engineering Social engineering is the practice of using psychological manipulation and deception to influence or control individuals or groups of people, usually for personal gain or political purposes. It involves the use of various tactics to gain trust, build relationships, and ultimately influence or control people’s thoughts, beliefs, and behaviours. Social engineering can involve psychological operations (PSYOPs) as a means of achieving its goals, but it can also involve other tactics and techniques, such as manipulation of social norms, use of propaganda, and manipulation of information. While there can be some overlap between social engineering and PSYOPs, social engineering is generally considered to be a broader category of influence operations that encompasses a range of tactics beyond just psychological manipulation. Such as: Phishing scams: This is a type of social engineering where attackers trick individuals into divulging sensitive information such as passwords or bank account details through fake emails or websites. Advertising: Advertisers use social engineering techniques to influence people’s behaviour and buying decisions by creating emotional connections and manipulating people’s desires. Political campaigns: Political campaigns use social engineering to manipulate public opinion and influence voting behaviour by using targeted messaging, propaganda, and emotional appeals. Product design: Product designers use social engineering techniques to create products that are more appealing and engaging to users, such as addictive mobile games or social media platforms that keep users hooked. Education: Educators use social engineering to shape students’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours through curriculum design, classroom activities, and messaging. These are just a few examples, but social engineering can be applied in many different contexts and industries. One of the earliest examples of social engineering is the Trojan Horse, a story from Greek mythology where the Greeks used deception to gain access to the city of Troy. In the 20th century, governments and corporations have used social engineering tactics for various purposes. One example is the propaganda campaigns of Nazi Germany, which used social engineering to promote their ideology and create a sense of national unity. Another example is the use of advertising to manipulate consumer behaviour and create brand loyalty. In the modern era, social engineering has become increasingly prevalent, especially in the digital world. Cyber-criminals use social engineering tactics such as phishing and pre-texting to trick people into revealing sensitive information or performing actions that can compromise their security. Social media platforms and search engines also use social engineering to influence user behaviour and collect personal data for advertising purposes. Additionally, political campaigns and organisations use social engineering to influence public opinion and promote their agenda. Overall, social engineering is a powerful tool that can be used for both positive and negative purposes. It is important to be aware of these tactics and take steps to protect oneself from manipulation and deception. Chapter VI: Propaganda in the Digital Age Definition of Propaganda in the Digital Age In the digital age, propaganda can be defined as the systematic dissemination of information, ideas, or narratives, often with a biased or misleading nature, to influence public opinion and shape beliefs and behaviours. Propaganda in the digital age takes advantage of the rapid spread of information through online platforms, social media, and other digital channels. It is often used by individuals, organisations, or governments to manipulate perceptions, advance agendas, and gain a strategic advantage. Here are some key characteristics of propaganda in the digital age: Mass Dissemination: Digital platforms enable the widespread distribution of propaganda to reach a large audience quickly. Social media, websites, blogs, and online forums serve as vehicles for propagandists to spread their messages to targeted individuals or broad segments of the population. Targeted Messaging: Digital technologies allow for precise targeting of propaganda messages based on demographic, geographic, or behavioural data. This enables propagandists to tailor their content to specific audiences, increasing the likelihood of resonance and impact. Amplification through Viral Spread: The viral nature of digital content can amplify the reach of propaganda. When individuals share, like, or comment on propaganda content, it can quickly spread across networks, influencing a broader range of individuals and potentially reinforcing biases or beliefs. Blurring of Information Sources (muddied waters): The abundance of information sources online, combined with the rise of user-generated content, can create a confusing landscape where it becomes challenging to discern reliable information from propaganda. Propagandists often exploit this ambiguity to blur the lines between fact and fiction, making it more challenging for individuals to critically evaluate information. Psychological Manipulation: Propaganda in the digital age often employs various psychological tactics to influence perceptions and behaviours. These tactics may include appealing to emotions, exploiting cognitive biases, using persuasive techniques, and employing micro-targeting strategies to tailor messages to individual psychological profiles. You may have heard of “gaslighting”, it is a form of psychological manipulation … Gas-lighting: typically involves a pattern of behaviour aimed at making the victim question their own perceptions, experiences, and even their sense of self. The gaslighter may engage in tactics such as lying, contradicting the victim’s memories or experiences, withholding information, trivialising their feelings, and creating a sense of confusion or self-doubt Gaslighting often occurs within personal relationships, but it can also be employed in other contexts, such as workplaces or political settings, to manipulate and exert influence over individuals or groups. It exploits psychological vulnerabilities and relies on the power dynamics between the gaslighter and the victim. Echo Chambers and Polarisation: Digital platforms can contribute to the formation of echo chambers, where individuals are exposed mainly to information that reinforces their existing beliefs and ideologies. This reinforcement can deepen divisions, polarise societies, and make individuals more susceptible to propaganda that aligns with their preconceived notions. Algorithmic Manipulation: Algorithms used by digital platforms can shape the information users are exposed to, potentially amplifying propaganda content based on user preferences and engagement patterns. This algorithmic manipulation can create filter bubbles, limiting exposure to diverse perspectives and fostering the spread of confirmation bias. Additional context … Cognitive Dissonance: Cognitive dissonance, the psychological discomfort that arises from conflicting beliefs or information, is relevant when discussing propaganda in the digital age. When individuals encounter information that contradicts their existing beliefs or opinions, they may experience cognitive dissonance. This discomfort can lead individuals to reject or rationalise the new information, or modify their beliefs to reduce the dissonance. Propagandists can exploit cognitive dissonance by strategically crafting messages that align with existing beliefs, making it more difficult for individuals to critically evaluate and challenge their own beliefs. Additionally, cognitive dissonance can contribute to the formation of echo chambers and filter bubbles, as individuals seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs, further reinforcing cognitive biases. Historical examples of Propaganda in the Digital Age World War II: Propaganda played a significant role during World War II, with both the Allied and Axis powers employing various propaganda techniques. Governments produced posters, films, and radio broadcasts to shape public opinion, boost morale, demonise the enemy, and encourage support for the war effort. Cold War: The Cold War era witnessed intense propaganda campaigns by both the United States and the Soviet Union. Each side used various mediums, such as newspapers, radio broadcasts, and television, to portray the other as a threat and promote their own political and ideological systems. Nazi Germany: The Nazi regime under Adolf Hitler employed extensive propaganda to control public opinion and advance its agenda. Joseph Goebbels, the Minister of Propaganda, utilised techniques like censorship, rallies, and the dissemination of anti-Semitic materials to manipulate public sentiment and maintain the support of the German population. Soviet Union: The Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin used propaganda to promote Communist ideology and create a cult of personality around Stalin himself. Propaganda posters, films, and literature portrayed Stalin as a strong leader and propagated the idea of a socialist utopia. These historical examples demonstrate how propaganda has been used throughout different periods to shape public opinion, manipulate perceptions, and advance political or ideological objectives. Current Examples of Propaganda in the Digital Age Digital propaganda is still very much present in today’s world, with governments and organisations using it to spread their message or influence public opinion. One example is the Chinese government’s use of digital propaganda to shape the narrative around its actions in Xinjiang and Hong Kong, with state-controlled media outlets spreading misinformation and propaganda. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an abundance of disinformation and propaganda surrounding the virus and its origins, with various governments and interest groups pushing their own narratives. Lets see a few current examples :) State-sponsored propaganda: Various countries have been accused of using digital platforms to disseminate propaganda in order to influence public opinion both domestically and internationally. State-sponsored propaganda can include the spread of misinformation, the manipulation of news narratives, and the creation of online troll armies to target specific individuals or groups. Election interference: Instances of propaganda campaigns aimed at influencing elections have been a significant concern in the digital age. Foreign actors or domestic groups may engage in spreading false information or using targeted messaging to sway public opinion, discredit political opponents, or undermine confidence in the electoral process. Extremist recruitment and radicalisation: Online platforms have been utilised by extremist groups to recruit individuals and spread propaganda to further their ideologies. These groups may use social media, online forums, and encrypted messaging apps to disseminate their messages, target vulnerable individuals, and radicalise them towards violent or extremist beliefs. Disinformation and deepfakes: The spread of disinformation, including fabricated news stories, doctored images, and manipulated videos, has become a prominent issue in the digital age. Deepfake technology, which allows for the creation of highly realistic fake videos or audio recordings, has the potential to further amplify the impact of disinformation campaigns. These are just a few general examples, and it’s important to recognise that propaganda in the digital age is constantly evolving and may take on new forms. Critical thinking, media literacy, and verification of information from reliable sources are essential in navigating the digital landscape and identifying instances of propaganda. While the digital age has made propaganda more widespread and accessible, it has also made it easier to detect and counteract. However, the fight against propaganda in the digital age is an ongoing battle that requires constant vigilance, awareness and understanding. Chapter VII: Information Warfare Information warfare refers to the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to influence or disrupt the decision-making of an adversary. This can include a range of tactics such as spreading false information, manipulating social media, and conducting cyber-attacks. Information warfare, or the use of information and communication technologies to gain a strategic advantage, has a long history. Here are some historical examples of information warfare: Operation Mincemeat (World War II): During World War II, the British launched Operation Mincemeat, a successful deception campaign. The British planted false information on a corpse, dressed as a British officer, and allowed it to wash ashore in Spain. The information suggested that the Allied forces would attack Greece instead of their actual target, Sicily. The Germans fell for the ruse and diverted their resources, giving the Allies a strategic advantage in the Sicily campaign. Operation Fortitude (World War II): Another significant deception campaign during World War II was Operation Fortitude, which aimed to deceive the Germans about the location of the D-Day landings. The Allies used a combination of fake radio transmissions, dummy equipment, and double agents to convince the Germans that the main invasion would occur at Pas-de-Calais instead of Normandy. This misinformation misled the Germans and allowed the Allies to launch a successful surprise attack. Stuxnet (2010): Stuxnet is a computer worm that is considered one of the most sophisticated cyber-weapons ever deployed. It was jointly developed by the United States and Israel and specifically designed to target Iran’s nuclear program. Stuxnet infected the computer systems controlling Iran’s uranium enrichment centrifuges, causing physical damage to the equipment. The attack was covert and aimed at disrupting Iran’s nuclear capabilities while maintaining plausible deniability. These historical examples highlight the various forms and techniques of information warfare throughout history, demonstrating the use of deception, manipulation, and cyber tactics to gain strategic advantages or achieve specific objectives. Current Examples of Information Warfare In recent years, there have been numerous examples of information warfare in the international arena. One notable example is the use of disinformation campaigns to sway public opinion on issues such as Taiwan and Hong Kong, as well as North Korea’s use of cyber-attacks to disrupt critical infrastructure and steal sensitive information. In addition, there is growing concern about the use of deepfakes, which are videos or audio recordings that have been manipulated to make it appear as though someone said or did something that they did not. Deepfakes have the potential to be used in information warfare to spread false information and manipulate public opinion on a large scale. Overall, information warfare is a growing concern in the modern world, as technology continues to advance and the internet becomes an increasingly important part of our lives. It is important for individuals and governments to be aware of these tactics and to take steps to defend against them. Political warfare and information warfare are related but distinct concepts. Political warfare refers to the use of political means to achieve strategic objectives, such as influencing or controlling a population, government, or territory. It includes tactics such as propaganda, disinformation, and psychological operations. On the other hand, information warfare is a type of warfare that involves the use of information and communication technologies to achieve strategic objectives. It includes tactics such as hacking, cyber-attacks, and disinformation campaigns. While political warfare can include the use of information operations, information warfare typically focuses more specifically on the use of information technology to achieve objectives. Both political warfare and information warfare can be used in conjunction with each other, as the manipulation of information and public opinion is often a key aspect of political warfare. Chapter VIII: Cyber Warfare Cyber warfare is the use of digital attacks and defensive measures to disrupt or destroy an enemy’s information systems and networks. Cyber warfare can take various forms, including espionage, sabotage, and propaganda. In recent years, cyber warfare has become an increasingly important tool in military and political conflicts, with countries and non-state actors using sophisticated cyber attacks to achieve strategic objectives. One of the earliest known examples of cyber warfare occurred in 2007 when the Russian government launched a cyber attack on Estonia. The attack was launched in response to Estonia’s decision to move a Soviet-era war memorial from central Tallinn. The cyber attack targeted Estonia’s government, banks, media outlets, and other critical infrastructure, causing widespread disruption and chaos. Another significant example of cyber warfare is the NotPetya ransomware attack that occurred in 2017. NotPetya is widely regarded as one of the most destructive cyber attacks in history, targeting organisations primarily in Ukraine but causing collateral damage worldwide. The malware disguised itself as a software update, infecting computer systems and spreading rapidly. It disrupted critical infrastructure, including government networks, power grids, and transportation systems. NotPetya demonstrated the potential for cyber attacks to have far-reaching consequences, impacting not only individual targets but also causing significant economic disruptions on a global scale. This incident underscored the importance of robust cyber-security measures and the need for international cooperation in combating cyber threats. Cyber warfare continues to be a growing concern in today’s interconnected world. In recent years, countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea have been accused of launching cyber attacks against their adversaries. These attacks have targeted everything from government agencies to corporations and critical infrastructure. In 2021, the United States government accused China of a cyber attack on Microsoft’s Exchange Server, which affected tens of thousands of organisations around the world. The attack was believed to have been carried out by a group known as Hafnium, which has links to the Chinese government. Another current example of cyber warfare is the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. In recent years, there have been several cyber attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, with Israel believed to be behind many of them. In response, Iran has launched cyber attacks against Israeli targets, including government agencies and private companies. Cyber warfare is a growing threat in today’s digital age. As technology continues to evolve, so do the tactics and techniques used in cyber attacks. Countries and non-state actors will continue to use cyber warfare to achieve their strategic objectives, making it essential for governments and organisations to prioritise cyber-security and develop effective defensive measures. Chapter IX: Economic Warfare Economic warfare is a type of warfare that aims to use economic means to achieve strategic objectives. It involves using economic tools such as sanctions, embargoes, tariffs, and trade barriers to weaken an adversary’s economy and limit their ability to pursue their strategic goals. Throughout history, economic warfare has been used as a tool of statecraft to achieve strategic objectives. Some examples of historical economic warfare include: The British blockade of Germany during World War I, which aimed to prevent Germany from accessing essential goods and materials needed for the war effort. The U.S embargo on Japan prior to World War II, which aimed to limit Japan’s access to oil and other critical resources. The U.S -led sanctions on South Africa during the apartheid era, which aimed to pressure the South African government to end apartheid policies. Today, economic warfare continues to be used by states to achieve strategic objectives. Some current examples of economic warfare include: The U.S sanctions on Iran, which aim to limit Iran’s ability to finance its nuclear program and support for regional allies. The ongoing trade war between the U.S and China, which involves the use of tariffs and trade barriers to pressure China to change its economic policies. The EU sanctions on Russia following its annexation of Crimea, which aim to limit Russia’s access to Western markets and technologies. Economic warfare can have far-reaching consequences for both the targeted state and the global economy. As such, it is a powerful tool that must be used judiciously and in accordance with international law. Chapter X: Hybrid Warfare Hybrid warfare refers to the use of a combination of conventional and unconventional methods of warfare by a state or non-state actor to achieve its objectives. This chapter will examine the concept of hybrid warfare and its historical and current examples. Throughout history, hybrid warfare has been used by various states and non-state actors. One prominent example is the Vietnam War, where the North Vietnamese forces used a combination of guerrilla tactics, propaganda, and conventional military force to resist the United States and its allies. Another example is the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan, where they used a combination of conventional military force and support for local insurgent groups to maintain control over the country. In recent years, hybrid warfare has become an increasingly prominent feature of global conflict. One example is Russia’s actions in Ukraine, where they used a combination of military force, information warfare, and support for local separatist groups to destabilise the country and annex Crimea. Another example is Iran’s use of proxies in Iraq and Syria, where they have used a combination of conventional military force and support for local militias to advance their strategic interests. Hybrid warfare has become a major challenge for the international community, as it blurs the lines between war and peace and makes it difficult to respond effectively to aggression. It requires a comprehensive approach that involves not only military force but also political, economic, and informational tools to counter the various elements of hybrid warfare. Chapter XI: The Grey Zone The grey zone is a term used to describe a state of conflict between nations or other actors in which the lines between war and peace are blurred. In the grey zone, actors engage in activities that are not quite war but are also not quite peace. These activities may include cyber attacks, propaganda, economic pressure, and other tactics that seek to undermine an opponent without engaging in direct military conflict. Historical examples of the grey zone include the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, where both sides engaged in espionage, proxy wars, and other activities that were not technically considered war. Other examples include the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, where Russian forces have used hybrid warfare tactics, including propaganda, cyber attacks, and support for separatist groups, to destabilise these countries without engaging in direct military conflict. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine is also an example of the grey zone, with both sides using tactics such as terrorism, propaganda, and economic pressure to achieve their objectives. The grey zone poses a significant challenge to traditional approaches to conflict resolution and diplomacy, as it is often difficult to clearly define the boundaries of the conflict and identify appropriate responses. As such, understanding the grey zone and developing effective strategies to counter its tactics is essential for maintaining international security and stability. Chapter XII: Political Warfare Political warfare is a set of techniques and methods used by governments and other organisations to achieve their objectives. It involves a combination of military and non-military means to influence the behaviour of an opponent and achieve a desired outcome. Political warfare can include the use of propaganda, covert action, economic pressure, and other forms of persuasion. Throughout history, political warfare has been used by nations and groups to gain advantages over their opponents. Some historical examples of political warfare include: The propaganda campaigns of World War I and II: Both sides in these wars used propaganda to sway public opinion and win support for their cause. The Cold War: The United States and the Soviet Union engaged in political warfare throughout the Cold War, using covert operations, propaganda, and economic pressure to gain advantages over each other. The Iranian Revolution: In 1979, a revolution in Iran overthrew the country’s government and installed an Islamic regime. The new government used political warfare to consolidate power and gain support from the Iranian people. Today, political warfare continues to be used by governments and other organisations to achieve their objectives. Some current examples of political warfare include: Disinformation Campaigns: Disinformation campaigns have become prevalent in the digital age. Various actors, including foreign governments, political parties, and interest groups, spread false or misleading information to shape public opinion and undermine their opponents. These campaigns often exploit existing left-right divisions by amplifying partisan narratives, promoting conspiracy theories, and fueling polarisation. Social Media Manipulation: Social media platforms have become battlegrounds for political warfare. Manipulation tactics, such as the use of bots, trolls, and coordinated influence campaigns, are employed to spread propaganda, amplify certain viewpoints, and suppress opposing voices. This manipulation aims to reinforce existing divisions, deepen polarisation, and sway public opinion. Identity Politics: Identity politics plays a significant role in contemporary political warfare. Activists, politicians, and interest groups often exploit social divisions based on race, gender, religion, or sexual orientation to advance their agendas. This can involve framing political issues in a way that appeals to specific identity groups and using divisive rhetoric to mobilise support or demonise opponents. Online Harassment and Cancel Culture: Online harassment and cancel culture have become tactics used in political warfare. Individuals or groups perceived as holding opposing views are targeted with coordinated harassment campaigns, often including doxing (publicly sharing private information) and threats. Cancel culture involves the public shaming and ostracisation of individuals or organisations deemed to have violated perceived social or political norms, leading to reputational damage or professional consequences. Election Interference: Election interference continues to be a prominent form of political warfare. State-sponsored actors and other entities attempt to influence elections through hacking, leaking sensitive information, spreading disinformation, and manipulating social media platforms. The objective is to undermine confidence in the democratic process, sow division among the electorate, and favor certain candidates or parties. It’s important to note that political warfare exists on both sides of the ideological spectrum, and it is not limited to left or right-wing divisions. The examples above illustrate some of the current tactics and strategies used in political warfare, but it is a constantly evolving landscape influenced by technological advancements and changing political dynamics. Chapter XIII: Soft Power Soft power is the ability to influence others through attraction, persuasion, and co-option rather than through coercion or force. It is a concept introduced by political scientist Joseph Nye in the late 1980s, who argued that a country’s power is not only determined by its military and economic might, but also by its cultural appeal, values, and policies. One of the earliest examples of the use of soft power was during the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviet Union competed for influence in the developing world. While the Soviet Union relied on economic aid and military assistance to win allies, the United States used its cultural and political influence to promote democracy, capitalism, and human rights. Another example is Japan’s use of soft power in the 1980s and 1990s. Through its successful economic model and popular culture, such as anime, manga, and video games, Japan projected a positive image to the world and won many fans in Asia and beyond. Today, China is perhaps the most visible practitioner of soft power, using its economic and cultural influence to enhance its global standing. China has invested heavily in its Confucius Institutes, which promote Chinese language and culture abroad, and in its Belt and Road Initiative, which aims to build infrastructure and improve connectivity across Asia and beyond. Another example is the European Union, which has used its soft power to promote democracy, human rights, and economic prosperity in its neighbourhood and beyond. The EU’s enlargement policy, which has expanded the union to include 27 member states, is seen as a successful example of soft power in action. Soft power can also be used by non-state actors, such as multinational corporations, NGOs, and social movements, to promote their interests and values. For example, tech companies like Google and Facebook have used their influence to promote free expression, privacy, and democratic values around the world. This leads us on to political correctness: political correctness can be seen as a form of cultural influence, as it shapes the discourse around social issues and norms. Countries that prioritise inclusivity and respect for marginalised communities can be seen as progressive and more appealing to global audiences. By adopting political correctness in their policies, cultural expressions, and public discourse, nations can enhance their soft power by projecting an image of social progress, fairness, and inclusivity. It’s important to note that political correctness can also be a subject of debate and criticism. Some argue that it restricts free speech or stifles dissenting viewpoints. These debates highlight the complexities and challenges associated with navigating cultural norms, differing perspectives, and balancing freedom of expression with the need for inclusivity and sensitivity. In conclusion, soft power is an increasingly important aspect of international relations, and countries and actors that can effectively use soft power can gain significant advantages in the global arena. Chapter XIV: Globalisation and 5th Generation Warfare I worked hard on this one … Globalisation is the process of increased “inter-connectedness” and interdependence among people, businesses, and countries across the world. It involves the flow of goods, services, capital, and ideas across national borders, enabled by advances in transportation, communication, and technology. Globalisation has been an ongoing process throughout human history, with various periods of intensified exchange and integration. Some historical examples include: The Silk Road, a network of trade routes that connected China with the Mediterranean world from the 2nd century BCE to the 14th century CE. The Age of Exploration, a period of European exploration and colonisation of the Americas, Africa, and Asia from the 15th to 17th centuries. The Industrial Revolution, a period of technological innovation and economic growth in Europe and North America from the late 18th to early 20th centuries. Globalisation has had a profound impact on modern warfare, particularly in the context of 5th generation warfare. Some of the ways in which globalisation and 5th generation warfare intersect include: Transnational Networks and Operations Globalisation has enabled the rise of non-state actors such as terrorist groups and transnational criminal organisations, which operate across multiple borders and exploit the vulnerabilities of a globalised world. These groups can use cyberspace, financial networks, and social media to plan and execute attacks, and to spread propaganda and disinformation. Economic Interdependence Globalisation has led to increased economic interdependence, with many countries relying on trade and investment flows to sustain their growth and development. As a result, economic sanctions and other forms of economic coercion have become key tools of 5th generation warfare, with countries seeking to use their economic leverage to achieve political or strategic objectives. Technological Innovation Globalisation has facilitated rapid advances in technology, including in areas such as artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and space exploration. These technologies have the potential to transform the nature of warfare, with countries seeking to develop new weapons systems and capabilities to gain an edge over their adversaries. Information and Communication Globalisation has enabled the rapid spread of information and ideas, including through social media and other online platforms. This has created new opportunities for influence operations and propaganda, with countries seeking to shape public opinion and disrupt the information environment of their adversaries. In conclusion, globalisation has had a profound impact on the nature of modern warfare, particularly in the context of 5th generation warfare. It has enabled the rise of new threats and challenges, while also providing new tools and opportunities for state and non-state actors to achieve their objectives. As such, understanding the intersection between globalisation and 5th generation warfare is essential for policymakers and strategists seeking to navigate the complex and rapidly evolving security environment of the 21st century. Chapter XV: Combating 5th Generation Warfare Recognising and Countering 5th Generation Warfare Tactics Combating 5th Generation Warfare requires recognition and awareness of the tactics being used, as well as the development and implementation of effective strategies across various sectors of society. Only by working together can we hope to effectively counter this new form of warfare and preserve democracy, security, and stability in the modern world. Empowering Individuals in Countering 5th Generation Warfare Raising awareness and understanding of 5th Generation Warfare tactics is vital for individuals, not just economies, to counter this form of warfare. By recognising these tactics and taking appropriate actions, individuals can contribute to the overall effort of safeguarding democracy, security, and stability. Here are a few examples of how individuals can play an active role: Knowledge and Education: Individuals can educate themselves and others about the tactics employed in 5th Generation Warfare, raising awareness among their friends, family, and communities. By understanding the techniques used to manipulate information, sow discord, or spread disinformation, individuals can be better equipped to recognise and resist such attempts. Critical Thinking and Media Literacy: Developing critical thinking skills and media literacy is crucial for individuals in the face of 5th Generation Warfare tactics. By questioning information sources, fact-checking, and considering diverse perspectives, individuals can avoid falling victim to false narratives and manipulation. Promoting media literacy in schools, workplaces, and communities can help individuals navigate the complex information environment effectively. Civil Discourse and Dialogue: Open and respectful communication is essential in countering the fragmentation and polarisation caused by 5th Generation Warfare. Individuals can actively engage in civil discourse, seeking common ground and promoting constructive dialogue across ideological differences. By fostering understanding and empathy, individuals can mitigate the impact of divisive tactics employed in this form of warfare. Support for Democratic Values and Institutions: Active participation in democratic processes, such as voting, engaging with elected representatives, and supporting institutions that uphold democratic principles, is crucial. By defending democratic values, advocating for transparency and accountability, and rejecting corruption, individuals can contribute to the resilience of democratic systems against 5th Generation Warfare tactics. Additional Strategies to Counter 5th Generation Warfare Counter-propaganda: Developing and disseminating counter-messaging to challenge false narratives and promote accurate information is essential in countering the influence of 5th Generation Warfare. International Cooperation: Building partnerships with other countries and organisations to share information and resources for countering 5th Generation Warfare can enhance collective efforts. Strengthening Democracy: Upholding democratic values and institutions, promoting transparency, and holding accountable those who engage in corrupt practices, disinformation, or other tactics used in 5th Generation Warfare is vital for preserving democratic systems. Offensive Strategies: Developing offensive strategies to deter adversaries from engaging in 5th Generation Warfare, such as imposing sanctions, cyber-attacks, or using special forces to disrupt adversary networks and operations, can be part of a comprehensive approach. Multidisciplinary Approach: Combating 5th Generation Warfare requires a multidisciplinary approach involving various sectors of society, including government, military, academia, media, and civil society. Collaborative efforts across these sectors can enhance effectiveness and resilience in countering this new form of warfare. By combining individual efforts with these additional strategies, we can successfully confront 5th Generation Warfare and protect the values and principles that underpin our democratic societies. Real Illuminati Media CIA Television Mass Mind Control Operation Mockingbird U.S.A. - https://rumble.com/v4b6vkr-real-illuminati-media-cia-television-mass-mind-control-operation-mockingbir.html Real Illuminati Media Ultimate TV Mind Control Media Manipulation Pt.2 Documentary - https://rumble.com/v4bd5cq-real-illuminati-media-ultimate-tv-mind-control-media-manipulation-pt.2-docu.html Real Illuminati One World Headquarter Order Out Of Chaos Freemasonry 1776-2024 - https://rumble.com/v4b8nqr-real-illuminati-one-world-headquarter-order-out-of-chaos-freemasonry-1776-2.html Global Citizen One World Together At Home 15 Min. City UN Extreme Propaganda - https://rumble.com/v4bfaqz-global-citizen-one-world-together-at-home-15-min.-city-un-extreme-propagand.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown-Red-Woke-Trans-Etc. Peoples Of The New America Phoenix Rising From The Ashes... See The True Dan Smoot Report To U.S.A.. So Yes America Is A Republic & Is Not A Democracy Is A Dangerous And Wrong Argument Enabling Sustained Minority Rule At The National level Is Not A Feature Of Our True Constitutional Design But A Perversion Of It. We The True People's Of The Worlds.

Documentary Of JFK To Sept. 9/11: Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick is a popular, or alternate, history of some significant components of the 20th Century. “It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis.” "The powers that have taken over our country will do anything in their sorcerer’s bag of tricks to distract us and keep up the illusion that they are protecting us so as to maintain power. These banking and corporate pirates are willing and more than ready to intimidate, buy off, or destroy any and all critics. It is important for us to realize the depth of evil we are dealing with here – they are willing to kill as many people as needed to accomplish their aims. It is shocking to realize that the very entity that is supposed to be protecting us – our government – is the very thing from which we need protection. It is shattering to realize that our leaders are genuine psychopathic criminals who are trying to take over our planet, impose full-spectrum dominance, enact a new world order and centralize power and control. Instead of this being a conspiracy theory, the evidence is all around us, as it is everywhere we look if we have the eyes to see beyond the carefully crafted and disseminated spell that is being perpetually woven all around us.... "The solution to winning the war on consciousness is for us to RECOGNIZE the nature of the war we are in, which can only happen through the agency of our consciousness. Realizing that the true war we are in is an assault on our own minds is the expansion of consciousness which is itself simultaneously the solution. From a deeper, more expansive perspective, the war on consciousness is itself the very catalyst and instrument for consciousness to awaken to itself." The narrative begins with the USA Robber Barons of the late 19th Century describing a carving up of USA industry between cooperating and competing families. The formation of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of the Income Tax get no coverage, and WWI also gets little mention. The story then focuses on USA and European industrial support for the National Socialist forces in German under the leadership of Adolf Hitler. These points are based on well established history, though perhaps overemphasized in places. A failing of the documentary in this early section is repeated mention of "The Illuminati" without defining what is meant by this group. The documentary points towards a loose and coordinated coalition of European royal houses, European investment bankers and their counterparts in families and investment bankers in the USA. Specific names and dates are related to allow a viewer to follow up on points being made. The Dulles brother's roles in the Treaty of Versailles and later as head of the CIA and Secretary of State receive mention. Major General Smedley Butler of the US Marine Corp is mentioned as exposing a fascist plot to attempt to implement a military coup d'etat in the USA during the 1930's. Following the defeat of Nazi Germany, brief mention is made of Gehlen, the Nazi counter-intelligence leader and his then continued role in post war Germany. Operation Paperclip, the project to transfer German rocket engineers to the USA, is also mentioned. The documentary then moves to focus on the assassination of JFK. The web of connections between USA Mafia bosses and the CIA is examined. The highly profitable international drugs trade facilitated by the CIA is also highlighted. The film focuses on Afghanistan/Pakistan and fails to mention to the Golden Triangle used by the CIA during the Vietnam war. Then, an exorbitant amount of effort is placed into documenting the research performed by independent researchers into the JFK assassination. Following this temporally dominant component of the documentary it fails to engage the other topic in its title, that of the 9/11 events. The latter part of the documentary descends into generalizations attempting to form some unified theme which connects the documentary. It provides advice for persons to resist the players its has identified as running national and international institutions of power. The documentary provides a useful introduction to some elements of the networks of power which cross the USA and European spheres from the late 19th Century to the late 20th. Some important elements are given only brief mention or entirely omitted. An example of omission would be the breaking of the Japanese diplomatic cypher, the "purple code", which provided the USA with advanced warning of the attack on Pearl Harbor which generated the outrage necessary to involve the USA officially in WWII. The documentary's focus on the JFK assassination is appropriate; its in the title. This dedication does minimize its ability to examine other topics. The documentary fails totally to justify the term "9/11" in its title. It implies that World Trade Center buildings 1 and 2 were loaded with explosives for demolition in a single day, which is ludicrous. The buildings were demolished with explosives, but you can't load the buildings in a single day. I give the documentary a middling score. It raises some well documented and important facts, though glances over others which could have added to its narrative. The work on the JFK assassination is its strength. Sadly, it does not consider the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. which I consider a related assassination. The last phase of the film is full of generalizations and lack of detail. It loses it way. Nonetheless, it does achieve many of its objectives, notably the relationship between many influential USA families, the decedents of the Robber Barons, and Nazism. Similarly, the JFK assassination was a complete cock up by a combination of the CIA and its Mafia partners on behalf of a ruling class that were threatened with losing exorbitant profits if JFK smashed the CIA into a thousand pieces and ended the Vietnam and Cold Wars. The film succeeds in documenting these narratives. If you really want to get to the bottom of the Kennedy assassination conspiracy, watch the 3.5 hour blockbuster, JFK to 911: Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick. I found it at once disturbing, enlightening, revolutionary, and full of common sense. It traces the history of the Dulleses who wrote the Treaty of Versailles; and the Bushes who played a hand in Hitler’s rise, JFK’s murder, and the WTC collapse. The film doesn’t shy away from the Mafia connection with the CIA, so obvious in the Kennedy plot, the Bay of Pigs, and Iran–Contra. We begin to see the US military, with its endless wars in Central America, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East, as an enforcement arm of the corporations. We begin to appreciate the pervasive influence of the propaganda machine, and of the permanent war economy it serves. Wealth is siphoned upward so the rich can retain their status as having more than the rest — while the rest are always having to support the war machine. Thus the public are given false enemies time and again, as the only rationale they can buy for continuing the status quo. Meanwhile we are unconsciously consuming and being entertained, buying into the old Caesar’s trick of bread and circuses. And we are subject to increasing surveillance and censorship, again under the guise of protection from enemies… because ironically the population itself is the real enemy of the ruling elite. The military is ultimately, we see now, a policing mechanism, used everywhere to protect or seize for the interests of the rich, at the expense of the poor. And the solution, according to the film’s conclusion, is “revolution.” Not of the bloody Bolshevik variety, of course, which so horrified the bluebloods of the early twentieth century. In that case the Leninists simply created a new class of wealthy elite, bureaucrats, nouveau riche. Rather, the brand of revolution this film advocates is the peaceful variety. We are enjoined by the British narrator/producer to “march on Washington” in the style of Martin Luther King or the short-lived Occupy movement. But under what leadership now, to stand vulnerable to the weaponry of the establishment? It’s a stretch to envision a sustained popular uprising, with everyone either unable to get time off work; or overwhelmed by the enormity of the systemic corruption; or in denial about the genocidal American dream and the latest fake “enemy”; or afraid of surveillance and prison and violent repression, if they raise a finger or a whimper. In this film the onus is put archly upon the American character itself, so prone to violence and gangsterism. I detect a latent British resentment of the wild roughshod American style, so impolite… but let’s not blame the messenger. Let’s own the guilt of complicity, as the dirty work of the century has been carried out in our name. Revolution in whatever form — street action or consciousness — results when, given all the information, we agree to take responsibility for our political fate. The United States of America’s Doll House: A Vast Tapestry of Lies and Illusions While truth-tellers Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning sit inside jail cells and Edward Snowden lives in exile in Russia, the American people hole up in an illusionary dwelling constructed to reduce them to children afraid of the truth. Or is it the dark? This is not new; it has been so for a very long time, but it has become a more sophisticated haunted doll’s house, an electronic one with many bells and whistles and images that move faster than the eye can see. We now inhabit a digital technological nightmare controlled by government and corporate forces intent on dominating every aspect of people’s lives. This is true despite the valiant efforts of dissidents to use the technology for human liberation. The old wooden doll houses, where you needed small fingers to rearrange the furniture, now only need thumbs that can click you into your cell’s fantasy world. So many dwell there in the fabricated reality otherwise known as propaganda. The result is mass hallucination. In a 1969 interview, Jim Garrison, the District Attorney of New Orleans and the only person to ever bring to trial a case involving the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, said that as a result of the CIA’s murderous coup d’état on behalf of the military-industrial-financial-media-intelligence complex that rules the country to this day, the American people have been subjected to a fabricated reality that has rendered them a nation of passive Eichmanns, who sit in their living rooms, popping pills and watching television as their country’s military machine mows down people by the millions and the announcers tell them all the things they should be afraid of, such as bacteria on cutting boards and Russian spies infiltrating their hair salons. Garrison said: The creation of such inanities as acceptable reality and unacceptable reality is necessary for the self-preservation of the super-state against its greatest danger: understanding on the part of the people as to what is really happening. All factors which contribute to its burgeoning power are exaggerated. All factors which might reveal its corrosive effect on the nation are concealed. The result is to place the populace in the position of persons living in a house whose windows no longer reveal the outside but on which murals have been painted. Some of the murals are frightening and have the effect of reminding the occupants of the outside menaces against which the paternal war machine is protecting them. Other murals are pleasant to remind them how nice things are inside the house. But to live like this is to live in a doll’s house. If life has one lesson to teach us, it is that to live in illusion is ultimately disastrous. In the doll’s house into which America gradually has been converted, a great many of our basic assumptions are totally illusory. [i] Fifty years have disappeared behind us since the eloquent and courageous Garrison (read On the Trail of the Assassins) metaphorically voiced the truth, despite the CIA’s persistent efforts to paint him as an unhinged lunatic through its media mouthpieces. These days they would probably just lock him up or send him fleeing across borders, as with Assange, Manning, and Snowden. It is stunning to take a cue from his comment regarding the JFK assassination, when he suggested that one reverse the lone assassin scenario and place it in the U.S.S.R. No American could possibly believe a tale that a former Russian soldier, trained in English and having served at a top Soviet secret military base, who had defected to the U.S. and then returned home with the help of the K.G.B., could kill the Russian Premier with a defective and shoddy rifle and then be shot to death in police headquarters in Moscow by a K.G.B. connected hit man so there would be no trial and the K.G.B. would go scot free. That would be a howler! So too, of course, are the Warren Commission’s fictions about Oswald. Snowden, Assange, and Manning If we then update this mental exercise and imagine that Snowden, Assange, and Manning were all Russian, and that they released information about Russian war crimes, political corruption, and a system of total electronic surveillance of the Russian population, and were then jailed or sent fleeing into exile as a result, who in the U.S., liberal, libertarian or conservative, would possibly believe the Russian government’s accusations that these three were criminals. Nevertheless, Barack Obama, the transparency president, made sure to treat them as such, all the while parading as a “liberal” concerned for freedom of speech and the First Amendment. He made sure that Snowden and Manning were charged under the Espionage Act of 1917, and that Assange was corralled via false Swedish sex charges so he had to seek asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London (a form of jail). He brought Espionage Act prosecutions against eight people, more than all former presidents combined. He hypocritically pardoned Manning on his way out the door as if this would polish his deluded liberal legacy after making her suffer terribly through seven years of imprisonment. He set the stage for Trump to re-jail Manning to try to get this most courageous woman to testify against Assange, which she will not do, and for the collaborationist British government to jail Assange in preparation for his extradition to the United States and a show trial. As for Snowden, he has been relegated to invisibility, good for news headlines once and for a movie, but now gone and forgotten. Obama and Trump, arch political “enemies,” have made sure that those who reveal the sordid acts of the American murderous state are cruelly punished and silenced. This is how the system works, and for most Americans, it is not happening. It doesn’t matter. They don’t care, just as they don’t care that Obama backed the 2009 coup d’état in Honduras that has resulted in so many deaths at the hands of U.S trained killers, and then Trump ranted about all these “non-white” people fleeing to the U.S. to escape a hell created by the U.S., as it has been doing throughout Latin America for so long. Who does care about the truth? Has anyone even noticed how the corporate media has disappeared the “news” of all those desperate people clamoring to enter the U.S.A. from Mexico? One day they were there and in the headlines; the next day, gone. It’s called news. The Sleepwalkers But even though a majority of Americans have never believed the government’s explanation for JFK’s murder, they nevertheless have insouciantly gone to sleep for half a century in the doll’s house of illusions as the killing and the lies of their own government have increased over the years and any semblance of a democratic and peaceful America has gone extinct. The fates of courageous whistle-blowers Assange, Manning, and Snowden don’t concern them. The fates of Hondurans don’t concern them. The fates of Syrians don’t concern them. The fates of Iraqis, Afghans, Yemenis, Palestinians don’t concern them. The fates of America’s victims all around the world don’t concern them. Indifference reigns. Obviously, if you are reading this, you are not one of the sleepwalkers and are awake to the parade of endless lies and illusions and do care. But you are in a minority. That is not the case for most Americans. When approximately 129 million people cast their votes for Donald Trump and HilIary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election, you know idiocy reigns and nothing has been learned. Ditto for the votes for Obama, Bush, Clinton, et al. You can keep counting back. It is an ugly fact and sad to say. Such a repetition compulsion is a sign of a deep sickness, and it will no doubt be repeated in the 2020 election. The systemic illusion must be preserved at all costs and the warfare state supported in its killing. It is the American way. It is true that average Americans have not built the doll’s house; that is the handiwork of the vast interconnected and far-reaching propaganda arms of the U.S. government and their media accomplices. But that does not render them innocent for accepting decades of fabricated reality for so-called peace of mind by believing that a totally corrupt system works. The will to believe is very powerful, as is the propaganda. The lesson that Garrison spoke of has been lost on far too many people, even on those who occasionally leave the doll house for a walk, but who only go slightly down the path for fear of seeing too much reality and connecting too many dots. There is plain ignorance, then there is culpable ignorance, to which I shall return. Denying Existential Freedom One of the first things an authoritarian governing elite must do is to convince people that they are not free. This has been going on for at least forty years, ever since the Church Committee’s revelations about the CIA in the mid-seventies, including its mind-control program, MKULTRA. Everyone was appalled at the epiphany, so a different tactic was added. Say those programs have been ended when in fact they were continued under other even deeper secret programs, and just have “experts” – social, psychological, and biological “scientists” – repeat ad infinitum that there is no longer any mind control since we now know there is no mind; it is an illusion, and it all comes down to the brain. Biology is destiny, except in culturally diversionary ways in which freedom to choose is extolled – e.g. the latest fashions, gender identity, the best hair style, etc. Create and lavishly fund programs for the study of the brain, while supporting and promoting a vast expansion of pharmaceutical drugs to control people. Do this in the name of helping people with their emotional and behavioral problems that are rooted in their biology and are beyond their control. And create criteria to convince people that they are sick and that their distress has nothing to do with the coup d’état that has rendered them “citizens” of a police state. We have been interminably told that our lives revolve around our brains (our bodies) and that the answers to our problems lie with more brain research, drugs, genetic testing, etc. It is not coincidental that the U. S. government declared the 1990s the decade of brain research, followed up with 2000-2010 as the decade of the behavior project, and our present decade being devoted to mapping the brain and artificial intelligence, organized by the Office of Science and Technology Project and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). How convenient! George H. W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, Obama, Trump — what a difference! But this is science and the welfare of the world. Science for idiots. Drip by drip, here and there, in the pattern of the best propaganda, as the French sociologist Jacques Ellul says – “for propaganda is not the touch of the magic wand. It is based on slow, constant impregnation. It creates conviction and compliance through imperceptible influences that are effective only by continuous repetition”[ii] – articles, books, media reports have reiterated that people are “determined” by biological, genetic, social, and psychological forces over which they have no control. To assert that people are free in the Sartrean sense (en soir, condemned to freedom, or free will) has come to be seen as the belief of a delusional fool living in the past , a bad philosopher, an anti-scientist, a poorly informed religionist, one nostalgic for existential cafes, Gauloises, and black berets. One who doesn’t grasp the truth since he doesn’t read the New York Times or watch CBS television. One who believes in nutty conspiracy theories. The conventional propaganda – I almost said wisdom – created through decades-long media and academic repetition, is that we are not free. Let me repeat: we are not free. We are not free. Investigator reporter John Rappoport has consistently exposed the propaganda involved in the creation and expansion of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) with its pseudo-scientific falsehoods and collusion between psychiatrists and the pharmaceutical industry. As he correctly notes, the CIA’s MKULTRA mind-control program has morphed into modern psychiatry, both with the same objectives of disabling and controlling people by convincing them that they are not free and are in need of a chemical brain bath.[iii] Can anyone with an awareness of this history doubt there is a hidden hand behind this development? Once you have convinced people that they are not free in the most profound sense, the rest is child’s play. Convinced that they are puppets, they become puppets to be willingly jerked around. “He played with me just as I used to play with dolls,” says Nora in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House. Now who would want to get people to believe they were not free? The answer is obvious given a minute of thought. It is not just Nora’s husband Torvald. Perfect examples of the persistence of the long-term, repetitive, impregnating propaganda appear in news headlines constantly. Here is an egregious example concerning the little understood case of the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy. On Friday, August 30, 2019, Sirhan, who has been in prison for fifty-two years for the murder of RFK that he did not commit, was stabbed by another prisoner. A quick click through the MSM headlines reporting this showed the same words repeated by all the corporate media as they fulfilled their function as CIA stenographers. One example, from CBS News, will suffice: “Robert Kennedy assassin hospitalized after prison stabbing.”[iv] RFK assassin, RFK assassin, RFK assassin … all the media said the same thing, which they have been doing for fifty-two years. Their persistency endures despite all the facts that refute their disinformation and show that Senator Kennedy, who was on his way to becoming president, was murdered, like his brother John, by forces of the national security state. Sartre and Bad Faith Lying and dissembling are ubiquitous. Being deceived by the media liars is mirrored in people’s personal lives. People lie and want to be deceived. They choose to play dumb, to avoid a confrontation with truth. They want to be nice (Latin, nescire, not to know, to be ignorant) and to be liked. They want to tuck themselves into a safe social and cultural framework where they imagine they will be safe. They like the doll’s house. They choose to live in what Jean Paul Sartre called bad faith (mauvaise foi): In Existential Psychoanalysis he put it thus: In bad faith it is from myself that I am hiding the truth. But with this ‘lie’ to myself, the one to whom the lie is told and the one who lies are one and the same person, which means that I must know in my capacity as deceiver the truth which is hidden from me in my capacity as the one deceived. Such bad faith allows people to fabricate a second act of bad faith: that they are not responsible for their ignorance of the truths behind the government’s and corporate media’s lies and propaganda, even as the shades of the prison house ominously close around us and the world edges toward global death that could arrive in an instant with nuclear war or limp along for years of increasing suffering. Those of us who write about the U.S. led demented wars and provocations around the world and the complementary death of democracy at home are constantly flabbergasted and discouraged by the willed ignorance of so many Americans. For while the mainstream media does the bidding of the power elite, there is ample alternative news and analyses available on the internet from fine journalists and writers committed to truth, not propaganda. There is actually far too much truth available, which poses another problem. But it doesn’t take a genius to learn how to research important issues and to learn how to distinguish between bogus and genuine information. It takes a bit of effort, and, more importantly, the desire to compare multiple, opposing viewpoints and untangle the webs the Web weaves. We are awash in information (and disinformation) and both good and bad reporting, but it is still available to the caring inquirer. The problem is the will to know. But why? Why the refusal to investigate and question; why the indifference? Stupidity? Okay, there is that. Ignorance? That too. Willful ignorance, ditto. Laziness, indeed. Careerism and ideology? For certain. Upton Sinclair put it mildly when he said, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on not understanding it.” Difficult? No, it’s almost impossible. But then there are many very intelligent people who have nothing to lose and yet adamantly refuse to entertain alternative possibilities to the reigning orthodoxies that have them in their grip. As do many others, I know many such people who will yes me to death and then never fully research issues. They will remain in limbo or else wink to themselves that what may be true couldn’t be true. They close down. This is a great dilemma and frustration faced by those who seek to convince people to take an active part in understanding what is really going on in the world today, especially as the United States wages war across the globe, threatens Russia, China, and Iran, among many others, and expands and modernizes its nuclear weapons capabilities. As for Assange, Manning, and Snowden, their plight matters not a whit. In fact, they have been rendered invisible inside the doll’s house, except as the murals on the windows flash back their images as threats to the occupants, Russian monsters out to eat them up. As the great poet Constantine Cavafy wrote long ago in his poem “Waiting for the Barbarians” and they never come: “Now what’s going to happen to us without barbarians? Those people were a kind of solution.” Then again, for people like U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, who knows the Russian barbarians have and will come again, life must be terrifying as he tries so manfully to bar the gates. The Russians have been the American solution in this fairy tale for so long that it’s hard for many Americans to believe another story. The Two-Headed Monster On the one hand, there is the massive propaganda apparatus operated by American intelligence agencies in conjunction with their media partners. On the other, there is the human predilection for untruth and illusions, the sad need to be comforted and to submit to greater “authority,” gratefully to accept the myths proffered by one’s masters. This tendency applies not just to the common people, but even more so to the intellectual classes, who act as though they are immune. Erich Fromm, writing about Germans and Hitler, but by extension people everywhere, termed this the need to “escape from freedom,” since freedom conjures up fears of vertiginous aloneness and the need to decide, which in turn evokes the fear of death.[v] There are also many kinds of little deaths that precede the final one: social, career, money, familiar, etc., that are used to keep people in the doll’s house. Fifty years ago, the CIA coined the term “conspiracy theory” as a weapon to be used to dismiss the truths expressed by critics of its murder of President Kennedy, and those of Malcom X, MLK, and RFK. All the media echoed the CIA line. While they still use the term to dismiss and denounce, their control of the mainstream media is so complete today that every evil government action is immediately seconded, whether it be the lies about the attacks of September 11, 2001, the wars against Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iran, etc., the coups disguised as color revolutions in Ukraine, Venezuela, Bolivia, Hong Kong, the downing of the Malaysian jetliner there, drone murders, the Iranian “threat,” the looting of the American people by the elites, alleged sarin gas attacks in Syria, the anti-Russia bashing and the Russia-gate farce, the “criminals” Assange, Manning, Snowden – everything. The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, Fox News, the Washington Post, CNN, NPR, etc. – all are stenographers for the deep state. So much of the ongoing propaganda travels under the banner of “the war on terror,” which is, of course, an outgrowth of the attacks of September 11, 2001, appropriately named and constantly reinforced as 9/11 in a wonderful example of linguistic mind-control: a constant emergency reminder to engender anxiety, depression, panic, and confusion, four of the symptoms that lead the DSM “experts” and their followers to diagnose and drug individuals. The term 9/11 was first used in the New York Times on September 12, 2001 by Bill Keller, the future Times’ editor and Iraq war cheerleader. Just a fortuitous coincidence, of course.Jacques Ellul on Propaganda Jacques Ellul has argued convincingly that modern propaganda in a technological mass society is more complicated than the state and media lying and deceiving the population. He argues that propaganda meets certain needs of modern people and therefore the process of deceit is reciprocal. The modern person feels lost, powerless, and empty. Ellul says, “He realizes that he depends on decisions over which he has no control, and that realization drives him to despair.” But he can’t live in despair; desires that life be meaningful; and wants to feel he lives in a world that makes sense. He wants to participate and have opinions that suggest he grasps the flow of events. He doesn’t so much want information, but value judgments and preconceived positions that provide him with a framework for living. Ellul wrote the following in 1965 in his classic book Propaganda: The majority prefers expressing stupidities to not expressing any opinion: this gives them the feeling of participation. For they need simple thoughts, elementary explanations, a ‘key’ that will permit them to take a position, and even ready-made opinions….The man who keeps himself informed needs a framework….the more complicated the problems are, the more simple the explanations must be; the more fragmented the canvas, the simpler the pattern; the more difficult the question, the more all-embracing the solution; the more menacing the reduction of his own worth, the greater the need for boosting his ego. All this propaganda – and only propaganda – can give him.[vi] Another way of saying this is that people want to be provided with myths to direct them to the “truth.” But such so-called truth has been preconceived within the overarching myth provided by propaganda, and while it satisfies people’s emotional need for coherence, it also allows them to think of themselves as free individuals arriving at their own conclusions, which is a basic function of good propaganda. In today’s mass technological society, it is essential that people be convinced that they are free-thinking individuals acting in good faith. Then they can feel good about themselves as they lie and act in bad faith. Culpable Ignorance It is widely accepted that political leaders and the mass media lie and dissemble regularly, which, of course, they do. That is their job in an oligarchy. Today we are subjected to almost total, unrelenting media and government propaganda. Depending on their political leanings, people direct their anger toward politicians of parties they oppose and media they believe slant their coverage to favor the opposition. Trump is a liar. No, Obama is a liar. And Hillary Clinton. No, Fox News. Ridiculous! – it’s CNN or NBC. And so on and so forth in this theater of the absurd that plays out within a megaplex of mainstream media propaganda, where there are many shows but one producer, whose overall aim is to engineer the consent of all who enter, while setting the different audiences against each other. It is a very successful charade that evokes name-calling from all quarters. In other words, for many people their opponents lie, as do other people, but not them. This is as true in personal as well as public life. Here the personal and the political converge, despite protestations to the contrary. Dedication to truth is very rare. But there is another issue with propaganda that complicates the picture further. People of varying political persuasions can agree that propaganda is widespread. Many people on the left, and some on the right, would agree with Lisa Pease’s statement in her book on the RFK assassination, A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, that “the way the CIA took over America in the 1960s is the story of our time.” [vii] That is also what Garrison thought when he spoke of the doll’s house. If that is so, then today’s propaganda is anchored in the events of the 1960s, specifically the infamous government assassinations of JFK, Malcolm X, MLK, and RFK, the truth of which the CIA has worked so hard to conceal. In the fifty or so years since, a vast amount of new information has made it explicitly clear that these murders were carried out by elements within the U.S. government, and were done so to silence the voices of four charismatic leaders who were opposed to the American war machine and the continuation of the Cold War. To turn away from this truth and to ignore its implications can only be described as an act of bad faith and culpable ignorance, or worse. But that is exactly what many prominent leftists have done. Then to compound the problem, they have done the same with the attacks of September 11, 2001. One cannot help thinking of what the CIA official Cord Meyer called these people in the 1950s: “the compatible left.” He felt that effective CIA propaganda, beside the need for fascist-minded types such as Allen Dulles and James Jesus Angleton, depended on “courting” leftists and liberal into its orbit. For so many of the compatible left, those making a lot of money posing as opponents of the ruling elites but often taking the money of the super-rich, the JFK assassination and the truth of September 11, 2001 are inconsequential, never to be broached, as if they never happened, except as the authorities say they did. By ignoring these most in-your-face events with their eyes wide shut, a coterie of influential leftists has done the work of Orwell’s crime-stop and has effectively succeeded in situating current events in an ahistorical and therefore misleading context that abets U.S. propaganda. They truncate the full story to present a narrative that distorts the truth. Without drawing a bold line connecting the dots from November 22, 1963 up to the present, a critique of the murderous forces ruling the United States is impossible. Among the most notable of such failures are Noam Chomsky, Alexander Cockburn, Howard Zinn, and Chris Hedges, men idolized by many liberals and leftists. And there are many others who have been deeply influenced by Chomsky, Cockburn, and Zinn and follow in their footsteps. Their motivations remain a mystery, but there is no doubt their refusals have contributed to the increased power of those who control the doll’s house. To know better and do as they have is surely culpable ignorance. From Bad to Worse Ask yourself: Has the power of the oligarchic, permanent warfare state with its propaganda and spy networks, increased or decreased in the past half century? Who is winning the battle, the people or the ruling elites? The answer is obvious. It matters not at all whether the president has been Trump or Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush, Barack Obama or George H. W. Bush, Richard Nixon or Jimmy Carter. The power of the national security state has grown under them all and everyone is left to moan and groan and wonder why. All the while the doll’s house has become more and more sophisticated and powerful with the growth of electronic media and cell phone usage. The new Cold War now being waged against Russia and China is a bi-partisan affair, as is the confidence game played by the secret government intended to create a fractured consciousness in the population. This fragmentation of consciousness prevents people from grasping the present from within because so many suffer from digital dementia as their attention hops from input to output in a never-ending flow of mediated, disembodied data. Trump and his followers on one side of the coin; liberal Democrats on the other. The latter, whose bibles are the New York Times, NPR, The Washington Post, Democracy Now, The Guardian, etc. – can only see propaganda when they can attribute it to Trump or the Russians. The former see everything as a liberal conspiracy to take down Trump. The liberals have embraced a new McCarthyism and allied themselves with the deep-state forces that they were once allegedly appalled by, including Republicans. Their embrace of the formerly despised war-monger John Bolton in the impeachment trial of Trump is a laughable case in point, if it weren’t so depraved and slimy. It surely isn’t the bloodthirsty policies of the Trump administration or his bloviating personality, for these liberals allied themselves with Obama’s anti-Russian rhetoric, his support for the U.S. orchestrated neo-fascist Ukrainian coup, his destruction of Libya, his wars of aggression across the Middle East, his war on terror, his trillion dollar nuclear weapons modernization, his enjoyment of drone killing, his support for the coup in Honduras, his embrace of the CIA and his CIA Director John Brennan, his prosecution of whistle-blowers, etc. The same media that served the CIA so admirably over the decades became the liberals’ paragons of truth. It’s enough to make your head spin, which is the point. Spin left, spin right, spin all around, because we have possessed your mind in this spectacular image game where seeming antinomies are the constancy of the same through difference, all the presidents coined by the same manufacturer who knows that coin flipping serves to entertain the audience eager for hope and change. This is how the political system works to prevent change. It is why little has changed for the better over half a century and the American empire has expanded. While it may be true that there are signs that this American hegemony is coming to an end (I am not convinced), I would not underestimate the power of the U.S. propaganda apparatus to keep people docile and deluded in the doll’s house, despite the valiant efforts of independent truth-tellers. How, for example, is it possible for so many people to see such a stark difference between the despicable Trump and the pleasant Obama? They are both puppets dancing to their masters’ tunes – the same masters. They both front for the empire. In his excellent book, Obama’s Unending Wars: Fronting the Foreign Policy of the Permanent Warfare State, Jeremy Kuzmarov assiduously documents Obama’s crimes, including his CIA background.[viii] As Glen Ford, of Black Agenda Report, says in the first sentence of his foreword, “Barack Obama may go down in presidential history as the most effective-and deceptive-imperialist of them all.” Read the book if you want all the details. They form an overwhelming indictment of the con artist and war criminal that is irrefutable. But will those who worship at the altar of Barack Obama read it? Of course not. Just as those deluded ones who voted for the reality television flim-flam man Trump will ignore all the accumulating evidence that they’ve been had and are living under a president who is Obama’s disguised doppelganger, carrying out the orders of his national security state bosses. This, too, is well documented, and no doubt another writer will arise in the years to come to put it between a book’s covers. Yet even Jeremy Kuzmarov fails to see the link between the JFK assassination and Obama’s shilling for the warfare state. His few references to Kennedy are all negative, suggesting he either is unaware of what Kennedy was doing in the last year of his life and why he was murdered by the CIA, or something else. He seems to follow Noam Chomsky, a Kennedy hater, in this regard. I point out this slight flaw in an excellent book because it is symptomatic of certain people on the left who refuse to complete the circle. If, as Kuzmarov, argues, Obama was CIA from the start and that explains his extraordinarily close relationship with the CIA’s John Brennan, an architect, among many things, of the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program, and that Obama told CIA Director Panetta that the CIA would “get everything it wanted,” and the CIA killed JFK, well, something’s amiss, an enormous gap in the analysis of our current condition. The doll’s house is a mind game of extraordinary proportions, orchestrated by the perverted power elites that run the show and ably abetted by their partners in the corporate mass media, even some in the alternative press who mean well but are confused, or are disinformation agents in the business of sowing confusion together with their mainstream Operation Mockingbird partners. It is a spectacle of open secrecy, in which the CIA has effectively suckered everyone into a game of to-and-fro in which only they win. Our only hope for change is to try and educate as many people as possible about the linkages between events that started with the CIA coup d’état in Dallas on November 22, 1963, continued through the killings of Malcolm X, MLK, RFK and on through so much else up to September 11, 2001, and have brought us to the deeply depressing situation we now find ourselves in where truthtellers like Julian Assange, Chelsey Manning, and Edward Snowden are criminalized, while the real perpetrators of terrible evils roam free. Yes, we must educate but also agitate for the release of this courageous trio. Their freedom is ours; their imprisonment is ours, whether we know it or not. The walls are closing in. Lisa Pease is so right: “The way the CIA took over America in the 1960s is the story of our time, and too few recognize this. We can’t fix a problem we can’t even acknowledge exists.” If we don’t follow her advice, we will be toyed with like dolls for a long time to come. There will be no one else to blame. Although the United States is allegedly a democracy with a rule of law, it has taken 17 years for public pressure to bring about the first grand jury investigation of 9/11. Based on the work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth led by Richard Gage, first responder and pilots organizations, books by David Ray Griffen and others, and eyewitness testimony, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry has presented enough hard facts to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to force his compliance with the provisions of federal law that require the convening of a federal grand jury to investigate for the first time the attacks of September 11, 2001. This puts the US Justice (sic) Department in an extraordinary position. Every informed person is aware that elements of the US government were involved either in the perpetration of the 9/11 attacks or in a coverup of the attacks. There will be tremendous pressures on the US Attorney’s office to have the grand jury dismiss the evidence as an unpatriotic conspiracy theory or otherwise maneuver to discredit the evidence presented by the Lawyers’ Committee, or modify the official account without totally discrediting it. We can have hopes that the United States can establish the true story of its own Reichstag Fire, but I am not holding my breath that the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York can stand up to the powerful elements in the Deep State that perpetuated or covered up the 9/11 false flag attacks or that he is inclined to try. What the 9/11 truthers and the Lawyers’ Committee have achieved is the destruction of the designation of 9/11 skeptics as “conspiracy theorists.” No US Attorney would convene a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Clearly, the evidence is compelling that has put the US Attorney in an unenviable position. The likely result will be comparable to the US Congress’ belated investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. No expert or informed person believed the obviously false story that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President Kennedy. All evidence pointed to a plot by the Joint Chiefs, CIA, and Secret Service whose right-wing leaders had concluded that President Kennedy was too “soft on communism” to do what was necessary for the US to prevail in the contest with the Soviet Union. Expert and public disbelief of the official story was so great that in 1976, 13 years after Kennedy’s assassination, Congress investigated. The real culprits were, of course, not identified, but two important results were forthcoming. One was the conclusion by the Select Committee on Assassinations that President Kennedy was the victim of a conspiracy and not of a lone gunman. The other was the release of the top secret Project Northwoods, which revealed the Joint Chiefs’ plan presented to President Kennedy for the US government to kill US citizens and shoot down US airliners and place the blame on Castro in order to gain public acceptance for an invasion of Cuba. The conclusion that a conspiracy, although unidentified, was involved in Kennedy’s assassination was the sop thrown to those who disputed the official lone gunman account. The revelation of Project Northwoods created awareness of a previously unknown US government plot that drew attention away from Kennedy’s assassination. If the Lawyers’ Committee and the 9/11 truthers trust the US Attorney to go entirely by the facts, little will come of the grand jury. If the United States had a rule of law, something as serious as 9/11 could not have gone for 17 years without investigation. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth http://www.ae911truth.org/ Pilots for 9/11 Truth http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/ Military Officers for 9/11 Truth http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/ Scientists for 9/11 Truth http://www.scientistsfor911truth.org/ Firefighters for 9/11 Truth http://firefightersfor911truth.org/ Actors & Artists for 9/11 Truth http://www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org/ Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth http://mp911truth.org/ Lawyers for 9/11 Truth http://lawyersfor911truth.blogspot.com/ Actors, Artists, and Athletes for 9/11 Truth http://www.aaa911truth.com/ 10-Page Summary of 9/11 Facts From Major Media See an excellent two-page summary of the best of this 9/11 facts timeline To verify 9/11 facts below, click on links to articles on major media websites Read excerpts from 20 of the most revealing major media articles on 9/11 Join in powerfully building a better world for all by spreading the word. 9/11 was one of the most pivotal events in world history. Its impact will be felt for years to come. You owe it to yourself to go beyond the simplified official story. This is an extremely complicated story with numerous players and motives. The 9/11 facts below don't all make sense or fit neatly together. It's a story full of espionage, deceit, and lies. But if forces out there are tricking us, they can only succeed if we, the general public, remain ignorant and passive. We limit our sources on this 9/11 timeline to the major media. It's not that one can only trust the major media. Much of the best reporting today comes from alternative media. Yet many are initially very skeptical. Some of these 9/11 facts are very hard to believe. Yet remember that each entry is reported by respected mainstream media sources and can easily be verified by clicking on the links provided to the original source. After seeing the importance of what's being hidden, you will very likely want to join in working together to build a brighter future. 1962: America's top military leaders draft plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in US cities to trick the public into supporting a war against Cuba in the early 1960s. Approved in writing by the Pentagon Joint Chiefs, Operation Northwoods even proposes blowing up a US ship and hijacking planes as a false pretext for war. [ABC News, 5/1/01, Pentagon Documents] 1980s: Osama bin Laden runs a front organization for the mujaheddin–Islamic freedom fighters rebelling against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. The CIA secretly backs the mujaheddin. Pakistan's Prime Minister Bhutto, understanding the ferocity of Islamic extremism, tells then President George Bush, "You are creating a Frankenstein." [NBC, 8/24/98, Newsweek, 10/1/01, more] 1994: Two attacks take place which involve hijacking planes to crash them into buildings, including one by an Islamic militant group. In a third attack, a lone pilot crashes a plane at the White House. Yet after Sept. 11, over and over aviation and security officials say they are shocked that terrorists could have hijacked airliners and crashed them into landmark buildings. [New York Times, 10/3/01] 1996: The Saudi Arabian government is financially supporting Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda and other extremist groups. After 9/11, the Bush Administration does nothing to confront the Saudi leadership over its support of terror organizations and its refusal to help in the investigation. [New Yorker, 10/22/01, more] 1996-1999: The CIA officer in charge of operations against Al Qaeda from Washington writes, "I speak with firsthand experience (and for several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama bin Laden." [Los Angeles Times, 12/5/04] 1996-2001: Federal authorities have known for years that suspected terrorists with ties to bin Laden were receiving flight training at schools in the US and abroad. One convicted terrorist confessed that his planned role in a terror attack was to crash a plane into CIA headquarters. [Washington Post, 9/23/01] 1996-Sept 11, 2001: Taliban envoys repeatedly discuss turning bin Laden over, but the US wants to be handed bin Laden directly, and the Taliban want to turn him over to some third country. About 20 more meetings on giving up bin Laden take place up till 9/11, all fruitless. [Washington Post, 10/29/01] 1997: Former National Security Advisor Brzezinski publishes a book portraying Eurasia as the key to world power, and Central Asia with its vast oil reserves as the key to domination of Eurasia. He states that for the US to maintain its global primacy, it must prevent any adversary from controlling that region. He notes that because of popular resistance to US military expansionism, his ambitious strategy can't be implemented "except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." [The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives] 1998: An Oklahoma City FBI agent sends a memo warning that "large numbers of Middle Eastern males" are getting flight training and could be planning terrorist attacks. [CBS, 5/30/02] A separate CIA intelligence report asserts that Arab terrorists are planning to fly a bomb-laden aircraft into the WTC (World Trade Center). [New York Times, 9/19/02, Senate Intelligence Committee, 9/18/02, more] Aug 1998: Within minutes of each other, truck bombs blow up the US embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, killing more than 220. For some of the time that bin Laden's men were plotting to blow up the two embassies, US intelligence was tapping their phones. [Newsweek, 10/1/01] Dec 1998: A Time magazine cover story entitled "The Hunt for Osama," reports that bin Laden may be planning his boldest move yet - a strike on Washington or possibly New York City. [Time, 12/21/98] Late 1998-Early 2000: On at least three occasions, spies in Afghanistan report bin Laden's location. Each time, the president approves an attack. Each time, the CIA Director says the information is not reliable enough and the attack cannot go forward. [New York Times, 12/30/01, more] Sept 1999: A US intelligence report states bin Laden and Al-Qaeda terrorists could crash an aircraft into the Pentagon. The Bush administration claims not to have heard of this report until May 2002, though it was widely shared within the government. [CNN, 5/18/02, AP, 5/18/02, Guardian, 5/19/02] Nov 1999: The head of Australia's security services admits the Echelon global surveillance system exists. The US still denies it exists. BBC describes Echelon's power as "astounding." Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of voice recognition. They home in on key words, or patterns of messages. [BBC, 11/3/99] Jan 2000: George Bush Sr. meets with the bin Laden family on behalf of the Carlyle Group. He also met with them in 1998. Bush's chief of staff could not remember that this meeting took place until shown a thank you note confirming the meeting. [Wall Street Journal, 9/27/01, Guardian, 10/31/01] Summer 2000: A secret military operation named Able Danger identifies four future 9/11 hijackers, including lead hijacker Mohamed Atta, as a potential threat and members of Al Qaeda. Yet none of this is mentioned later in the 9/11 Commissions' final report. When questioned, the 9/11 commission's chief spokesman initially says that staff members briefed about Able Danger did not remember hearing anything about Atta. Days later, however, after provided detailed information, he says the uniformed officer who briefed two staff members had indeed mentioned Atta. [New York Times, 8/11/05, more] Sept 2000: The think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC) writes the blueprint for a global "Pax Americana." Written for the Bush team before the 2000 election, Rebuilding America's Defenses is a plan for maintaining global US preeminence and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests. The plan shows Bush intends to take control of the Persian Gulf whether or not Saddam Hussein is in power. It advocates the transformation of the US military. But, "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbour". [BBC, 2/14/07, Sunday Herald, 9/7/02, read report, more] 2000 - 2001: The military conducts exercises simulating what the White House later says is unimaginable: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties. One imagined target is the WTC. [USA Today, 4/19/04] Another is the Pentagon. [Military District of Washington (Army), 11/3/00] Jan 2001: A flight school alerts the FAA. Hijacker Hani Hanjour lacks English and flying skills needed for his commercial pilot's license. An FAA official then sits next to him in class. The official offers a translator to help him pass, but the flight school says this is against the rules. [AP, 5/10/02] Yet despite poor flying skills, official reports later state Hanjour executes a 330 to 360 degree turn of AA Flight 77 over Washington on 9/11 in under four minutes and manages a precision hit on the Pentagon. [NY Times, 10/16/01, NTSB, 2/19/02] Jan 2001: After the elections, US intelligence agencies are told to "back off" investigating the bin Ladens and Saudi royals. There have always been constraints on investigating Saudis. [BBC, 11/6/01, more] Spring 2001: Military and government documents are released that seek to legitimize the use of US military force in the pursuit of oil. One article advocates presidential subterfuge in the promotion of conflict and "explicitly urge[s] painting over the US's actual reasons for warfare as a necessity for mobilizing public support for a conflict." [Sydney Morning Herald, 12/26/02, more] May 2001: US security chiefs reject Sudan's offer to turn over voluminous files about bin Laden and al-Qaeda. Sudan has made this offer repeatedly since 1995. [Guardian, 9/30/01, more] May 2001: Secretary of State Powell gives $43 million in aid to the Taliban government. [Los Angeles Times, 5/22/01, CNN 5/17/01] This follows $113 million given in 2000. [State Dept. Fact Sheet, 12/11/01] May 2001: The US introduces "Visa Express" program allowing any Saudi Arabian to obtain visas through their travel agent instead of appearing at a consulate in person. [US News and World Report, 12/12/01] Five hijackers use Visa Express to enter the US. [Congressional Intelligence Committee, 9/20/02] May-Aug 2001: A number of the 9/11 hijackers make at least six trips to Las Vegas. These "fundamentalist" Muslims drink alcohol, frequent strip clubs, and smoke hashish. Some even have strippers perform lap dances for them. [San Francisco Chronicle, 10/4/01, Newsweek, 10/15/01] June 13, 2001: Egyptian President Mubarak through his intelligence services warns the US that bin Laden's Islamic terrorist network is threatening to kill Bush and other G8 leaders at their July economic summit meeting in Italy. The terrorists plan to use a plane stuffed with explosives. [NY Times, 9/26/01] June 28, 2001: CIA Director George J. Tenet has been "nearly frantic" with concern. A written intelligence summary for national security adviser Condoleezza Rice says: "It is highly likely that a significant al Qaeda attack is in the near future, within several weeks." Rice will later claim that everyone was taken by complete surprise by the 9/11 attack. By late summer, one senior political appointee says, Tenet had repeated this threat "so often that people got tired of hearing it." [Washington Post, 5/17/02] July 4-14, 2001: Bin Laden reportedly receives kidney treatment from Canadian-trained Dr. Callaway at the American Hospital in Dubai. Telephoned several times, the doctor declines to answer questions. During his stay, bin Laden allegedly is visited by one or two CIA officers. [Guardian, 11/1/01, Sydney Morning Herald, 10/31/01, Times of London, 11/1/01, UPI, 11/1/01, more] July 10, 2001: A Phoenix FBI agent sends a memorandum warning about Middle Eastern men taking flight lessons. He suspects bin Laden's followers and recommends a national program to check visas of suspicious flight-school students. The memo is sent to two FBI counter-terrorism offices, but no action is taken. [New York Times, 5/21/02] Vice President Cheney says in May 2002 that he opposes releasing this memo to congressional leaders or to the media and public. [CNN, 5/20/02] July 24, 2001: Larry Silverstein's $3.2 billion 99-year lease of the WTC is finalized. Silverstein hopes to win $7 billion in insurance from the destruction of the WTC towers. [NY Times, 02/16/03, Newsday, 09/25/02] July 26, 2001: Attorney General Ashcroft stops flying commercial airlines due to a threat assessment. [CBS, 7/26/01] He later walks out of his office rather than answer questions about this. [AP, 5/16/02, more] Late July 2001: The US and UN ignore warnings from the Taliban foreign minister that bin Laden is planning an imminent huge attack on US soil. The FBI and CIA also fail to take seriously warnings that Islamic fundamentalists have enrolled in flight schools across the US. [Independent, 9/7/02, more] Summer 2001: Intelligence officials know that al Qaeda both hopes to use planes as weapons and seeks to strike a violent blow within the US, despite government claims following 9/11 that the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks came "like bolts from the blue." [Wall Street Journal, 09/19/02, CNN, 9/12/02] Summer 2001: Russian President Putin later says publicly that he ordered his intelligence agencies to alert the US of suicide pilots training for attacks on US targets. [Fox, 5/17/02] Late summer 2001: Jordanian intelligence agents go to Washington to warn that a major attack is planned inside the US and that aircraft will be used. Christian Science Monitor calls the story "confidently authenticated" even though Jordan later backs away from it. [CS Monitor, 5/23/02] Aug 5-11, 2001: Israel warns US of an imminent Al Qaeda attack. [Fox News, 5/17/02] Aug 6, 2001: President Bush is warned by US intelligence that bin Laden might be planning to hijack commercial airliners. The White House waits eight months after 9/11 to reveal this fact. [New York Times, 5/16/02] Titled "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US," the intelligence briefing specifically mentions the World Trade Center. Yet Bush later states the briefing "said nothing about an attack on America." [CNN, 4/12/04, Washington Post, 4/12/04, White House, 4/11/04, CNN, 4/10/04, Intelligence Briefing, 8/6/01, more] Aug 22, 2001: Top counter-terrorism expert John O'Neill quits the FBI due to repeated obstruction of his al-Qaeda investigations and a power play against him. He was the government's "most committed tracker of bin Laden and al-Qaeda." The next day he starts a new job as head of security at the WTC. He is killed weeks later in the World Trade Center during the 9/11 attack. [New Yorker, 1/14/02] Aug 24, 2001: Frustrated with lack of response from FBI headquarters about detained suspect Moussaoui, the Minnesota FBI begins working with the CIA. The CIA sends alerts calling him a "suspect 747 airline suicide hijacker." Three days later an FBI Minnesota supervisor says he is trying to make sure that Moussaoui does not "take control of a plane and fly it into the World Trade Center." [Senate Intelligence Committee, 10/17/02] FBI headquarters chastises Minnesota FBI for notifying the CIA. [Time, 5/21/02] FBI Director Mueller will later say "there was nothing the agency could have done to anticipate and prevent the [9/11] attacks." [Senate Intelligence Committee, 9/18/02, more] https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11-facts Hoax National Terrorist Attacks Controlled Demolition Actual Collapse Twin Towers - https://rumble.com/v3i3ccq-hoax-national-terrorist-attacks-controlled-demolition-actual-collapse-twin-.html On Sept. 11, 2001, terrorists attacked the United States and killed almost 3,000 innocent people. A terse and information packed summary of exactly who was involved in the 9-11 2001 attacks, what they did, and what motivated them. Truly an amazing piece of research, the result of monumental effort on the part of investigators who just wouldn't let it go. The people who think 9/11 may have been an 'inside job' 22 years ago today. https://911planeshoax.com/ Yes its true conspiracy theory that “controlled demolition” caused one, if not all three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings to collapse on 9/11, has been steadfastly denied via various government investigations. U.S. officials have concluded the buildings collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. Of the 2,996 deaths terror attack related deaths on Sept. 11, 2001, 2,606 were in the W

A World Wide Rumble Day Of True World Peace 2024 This Is Most Important Video You Will Ever See In Your Life Time In This World Today Let All Live In World Peace! Learn About The Most Important Things In Life And Why They Are Essential To Achieve Happiness And Fulfilment In World Of Love, Mind & Body. In today’s digital world, many of us are thrown by social status, materialistic items and luxuries – and how can you blame us? We are constantly being shown that the image of perfection includes these things, with edited Instagram images and reality TV shows highlighting the elite. In reality, however, status, designer products and expensive items are worth nothing; they won’t make you happy nor healthy. So, regardless of where you are in the world, the most important things on your list should include the following. 1. Health importance of health in life Being healthy is the single, most important part of our existence – without good health, our lives can be cut short. That said, it’s important not to take good health for granted and feed our bodies nutrients that they deserve by eating a balanced diet and engaging in regular physical activity. According to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HSS), by maintaining a healthy lifestyle, you can ‘reduce your risk of chronic diseases (like heart disease and cancer), and promote your overall health.’ 2. Family While you may sometimes argue and get annoyed with your family, they are your unit and the ones that you can turn to in times of happiness and sorrow. No matter what you go through with your family, they will always be there to guide and support you and to help you learn and grow as a person. The love from a family member is unconditional and should not be taken for granted. Some people go through life without truly appreciating just how important having their family’s support is and spend the majority their existence feeling unhappy. So, if you don’t usually show your family how much they mean to you, now is the time to start! 3. Friends Just like family, friends are a vital part of our existence and happiness. They are people that can share the best parts of your life with you and will be there as a confidant when you need to talk about personal issues. While real friends are hard to come by, most will have a handful of trusted friends that they can rely on. And even though you may outgrow certain friends during different stages of your life, you will have opportunities to form new relationships with people that you come across. 4. Love Love is the epicenter of every aspect of your life – it doesn’t just relate to having a partner. You will love your partner in a unique way, but you will also have unchangeable affection for your family and friends. Love is also the feeling that will drive you throughout your career, extracurricular activities, interests and hobbies. Moreover, you will experience love in its varying forms; you may go on holiday and fall in love with a particular city, cuisine or culture. What’s vital is that you embrace everything that you love and enjoy. 5. Purpose Looking for purpose in life Having a purpose is a fundamental component of living a fulfilling life. Without purpose, we won’t have the motivation to achieve great things or even do something simple such as getting out of bed in the morning. According to psychologist Steve Taylor, not having a purpose ‘makes us more vulnerable to boredom, anxiety, and depression.’ Meanwhile, having a strong sense of purpose can have a positive effect on our lives. If you take a page out of the books of successful entrepreneurs, most of them made it by having a drive and a sense of purpose. They worked hard because they were confident of what they could achieve – and this purpose is something that we need to follow to feel accomplished in life. 6. Passion Along with purpose comes passion; our desires, our dreams and our hopes in life. When you’re passionate about something, you’re going to work hard to achieve it. For example, I was a self-established makeup artist, but her passion for cosmetics pushed her to build a beauty empire that’s now worth over $600 million. That said, passion looks different for everyone; some people will be passionate about giving back to society, while others will have a passion for personal gain. Just ensure that your passion is for a good cause and that it brings joy not only to yourself but to others, too. 7. Wellness Besides having a healthy body, it’s essential to have a healthy mind also! Luckily, we live in a time where mental wellbeing is at the forefront, and those who struggle with any mental health disorders are being given the treatment and care that they need to lead a happy life. That said, there are many ways that you can improve your wellbeing. Find activities that help you relax; whether it’s meditating daily, listening to a motivational podcast or simply going for a walk to gather your thoughts. Whatever method you choose, ensure that your wellbeing is at the forefront of each of these activities. 8. Education Having a good education will help you progress in life. This doesn’t necessarily mean that you must complete higher education to be successful. What it does mean is that you should continue to learn new things on a daily basis. The method of education is entirely up to you – you might want to watch an education video, documentary or film; read a book or the news. What is important is the knowledge you gain from your education and how you choose to apply it within your life. 9. Time Having the ability to value time really matters in life. Time is precious and priceless, and it should be taken advantage of. When we have a better understanding of time, we can form good habits and structure our daily activities. We can do things that will help us progress and also schedule time to spend with family, friends and hobbies. 10. Water vital and clean water Water is the most critical part of survival – without clean water, we wouldn’t be able to live. Our bodies are made up of up to 60% of water, and it’s used in all our cells, organs, and tissues to help regulate our temperature and maintain other bodily functions. Therefore, to ensure that we aren’t dehydrated and at risk of falling ill, we need to drink at least six glasses of water per day. 11. Food While food can be an indulgence and a hobby, it’s also a necessary part of our existence. Our body will need carbohydrates, protein, fat, minerals and vitamins to function and stay healthy. So, to maintain our health, we need to rely on a healthy and balanced diet. 12. Sleep Sleep also plays a vital role in our physical and mental wellbeing. As reported in Healthline, ‘Sleeping less than 7–8 hours per night is linked to an increased risk of heart disease and stroke.’ But lack of sleep doesn’t only put our health at risk, as it also has a negative effect on our mood. Ever noticed how you’ve been grouchy and irritable when you’ve not had enough sleep? That’s because poor sleep quality is directly linked to mental health disorders like depression and anxiety. 13. Music Have you ever had tears spring to your eyes when you hear a certain song? I know I have. Music, in all its forms, is beautiful. It has the ability to bring people together, as it's a universal language that everyone can understand. No matter what culture you come from, music can unite us all. It has the power to evoke emotions and memories, like making you think of your wedding or a road trip you took as a child. It can make us laugh, cry, and dance, which is why it truly is one of the most important things in life. 14. Money Sadly, money is also one of the most important things in our lives. Money gives us the ability to buy the things we need, like food and shelter. It also allows us to purchase the things we want, like a new car or a nice vacation. Money also gives us a sense of security. For example, if you have money in the bank, you know that you can cover your basic living expenses if you suddenly lose you job. In short, money is essential for a happy and comfortable life. Granted, money isn't everything and it can't buy happiness, but it can certainly make life a whole lot easier! 15. Positivity positive sunflower representing importance to life Positivity is contagious. When you are positive, you radiate good vibes that others around you pick up on. This creates a snowball effect of positivity, making everyone feel better. Secondly, positivity is essential for achieving your goals. A positive attitude allows you to stay focused and motivated, even when things are tough. It attracts success, as people are drawn to those who have a positive outlook on life, and this can open doors for you professionally and personally. So, if you want to live a happy and successful life, make sure to focus on the glass being half full instead of half empty. 16. Communication Communication is one of the most important things in life because it allows people to share their thoughts, feelings, and ideas. It also allows people to connect with others and build relationships. When communication is effective, it can help people to understand each other better and resolve conflicts. It can also make people feel more connected to each other and build trust. It’s important in all aspects of life, from personal relationships to work and school. Good communication skills are essential for success in all areas of life, so it’s important to learn how to communicate effectively. 17. Memories Why are memories so important? I think it has something to do with the fact that they are one of the few things in life that we can keep with us forever. Sure, we can hold on to material possessions, but eventually they will wear out or be lost. But, usually, our memories stay with us until the day we die. They are a part of who we are, and they help to define our identity. Think about it: when you look back on your life, what do you remember most vividly? The big moments, of course, like your wedding day, the birth of your child, or that time you won the championship game. But also, the small moments, like sitting around the campfire with friends, laughing until you cried, watching the sunset on a perfect summer day. These are the moments that make up our lives, and they are what we hold on to when everything else is gone. Creating memories is one of the most important things in life, because in the end, they are all we have left. 18. Compassion Compassion means being able to understand and share in the feelings of another person. It's about having empathy for someone who is going through a tough time and being able to offer support. It’s a key interpersonal skill to have, as compassion is about being kind and caring, even when it's difficult. Having compassion is essential because it helps us to connect with others, and it allows us to see the world from their perspective. It also motivates us to help others, whether it's by volunteering our time or donating money to a worthy cause. In a world that can often be harsh and cruel, compassion is one of the most important things that we can possess. 19. Freedom Imagine for a moment that you are living in a world where you are not free. You are not free to choose your own friends, or what you want to wear, or where you want to live. You are not even free to think your own thoughts. Instead, you must conform to the thinking of those in power. It would be like being trapped in a prison, with no hope of ever escaping. That is why having freedom is one of the most important things in life. Freedom gives us the ability to control our lives and make our own choices. It allows us to pursue our dreams and build the future we want for ourselves. And it’s only when we have freedom that we can truly be happy and fulfilled. That is why freedom is so important. It is the most basic human right. 20. Gratitude Importance of gratitude Why is gratitude so important? Well, let's think about it. First of all, when we are grateful for what we have, we are more likely to take care of it and appreciate it. Secondly, gratitude helps us focus on the positive aspects of our lives, which can lead to greater happiness and satisfaction. And finally, gratitude creates a sense of abundance instead of scarcity. When we feel that we have enough, we are more likely to share with others, which creates a sense of community and connection. So, all in all, gratitude is pretty important! Why not take a moment each day to think about three things you're grateful for by practicing mindfulness? It could change your life. Final thoughts While it’s easy to get wrapped up in the material things that we think make us happy, science has shown that it’s actually the intangibles that have the biggest impact on our well-being. Being compassionate and grateful, having the support of loved ones, and living a meaningful life all contribute to our happiness in ways that are difficult to put a price tag on. By focusing on material things, we lose sight of what’s really important. But by taking a step back and reframing our mindset, we can appreciate all the wonderful things life has to offer. Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The right to freedom of expression has been recognized as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international human rights law by the New World Order. So We All Hope At This Channel That This True Video i hope that my attempts to help all viewers and all sex's and all races to understand without hate for each other the complex biology related to sex, gender identity, and attraction and we can stop killing each other now and maybe we can live in peace and love as we are and can be on a threshold of a dream starting today ! On a Threshold of a Dream / Question Of Balance - Music Moody Blues. In The Beginning - First Man or Woman or AI or ?: I think, I think I am, therefore I am, I think. Establishment: Of course you are my bright little star, I've miles And miles Of files Pretty files of your forefather's fruit and now to suit our great computer, You're magnetic ink. First Man: I'm more than that, I know I am, at least, I think I must be. Inner Man: There you go man, keep as cool as you can. Face piles And piles Of trials With smiles. It riles them to believe that you perceive the web they weave And keep on thinking free. Lovely To See You - A wonderful day for passing my way. Knock and my door and even the score With your eyes. Lovely to see you again my friend. Walk along with me to the next bend. Dark cloud of fear is blowing away. Now that you're hear, you're going to stay 'cause it's Lovely to see you again my friend. Walk along with me to the next bend. Tells us what you've seen in faraway forgotten lands. Where empires have turned back to sand. Wonderful day for passing my way. Knock and my door and even the score With your eyes. Lovely to see you again my friend. Walk along with me to the next bend. Question Of Balance - Why do we never get an answer - When we're knocking at the door - With a thousand million questions - About hate and death and war? - 'Cause when we stop and look around us - There is nothing that we need - In a world of persecution - That is burning in its greed Why do we never get an answer - When we're knocking at the door? - Because the truth is hard to swallow - That's what the war of love is for It's not the way that you say it - When you do those things to me - It's more the way that you mean it - When you tell me what will be - And when you stop and think about it - You won't believe it's true - That all the love you've been giving - Has all been meant for you I'm looking for someone to change my life - I'm looking for a miracle in my life - And if you could see what it's done to me - To lose the love I knew - Could safely lead me through Between the silence of the mountains - And the crashing of the sea - There lies a land I once lived in - And she's waiting there for me - But in the grey of the morning - My mind becomes confused - Between the dead and the sleeping - And the road that I must choose I'm looking for someone to change my life - I'm looking for a miracle in my life - And if you could see what it's done to me - To lose the love I knew - Could safely lead me to - The land that I once knew - To learn as we grow old - The secrets of our soul - It's not the way that you say it when you do those things to me - It's more the way you really mean it when you tell me what will be Why do we never get an answer - When we're knocking at the door - With a thousand million questions - About hate and death and war? - When we stop and look around us - There is nothing that we need - In a world of persecution - That is burning in its greed Why do we never get an answer - When we're knocking at the door? So Deep Within You - Talk to me baby, I want to sleep at night - My heart is heavy, it's weighed down by the night. - And now I'm lonely, I want to see the light - So deep within you. Cool wind is blowing through your crazy hair. - Warm colours flowing, this feeling we have shared. - And now I'm lonely I want to feel the love - So deep within you. Your love's a never-ending dream - A castle by a stream of sweet understanding - I know you're thinking of me too, the messages - From you are my inspiration. Love's incense lingers, it never fades away. - Like you I'm waiting for our special day. - And now I'm lonely I want to feel the love - So deep within you My love is burning, like a forest fire - My heart is yearning, I feel a warm desire. - And now I'm lonely I want to touch the fire - So deep within you. The Dream - When the white eagle of the North is flying overhead The browns, reds and golds of autumn lie in the gutter, dead. Remember then, that summer birds with wings of fire flaying Came to witness springs new hope, born of leaves decaying. Just as new life will come from death, love will come at leisure. Love of love, love of life and giving without measure Gives in return a wonderous yearn of a promise almost seen. Live hand-in-hand and together we'll stand on the threshold of a dream. Have You Heard (Part 1/2) - Part 1 - Now you know that you are real, - Show your friends that you and me - Belong to the same world, - Turned on to the same word, - Have you heard? - Now you know that you are free, - Living all your life at ease. - Each day has its always, - A look down life's hallways, doorways, - To lead you there. (The Voyage) No Words Have You Heard (Part 2/2) - Part 2 - Now you know how nice it feels, - Scatter good seed in the fields. - Life's ours for the making, - Eternity's waiting, waiting, - For you and me. - Now you know that you are real, - Show your friends that you and me - Belong to the same world, - Turned on to the same word, - Have you heard? - Have you heard? - Have you heard? - Have you heard? - Have you heard? The Word & Om Spoken: This garden universe vibrates complete - Some, we get a sound so sweet - Vibrations reach on up to become light - And then through gamma, out of sight - Between the eyes and ears there lie - The sounds of color and the light of a sigh - And to hear the sun, what a thing to believe - But it's all around if we could but perceive - To know ultra-violet, infra-red, and x-rays - Beauty to find in so may ways - Two notes of the chord, that's our full scope - But to reach the chord is our life's hope - And to name the chord is important to some - So they give it a word, and the word is OM "OM" - The rain is on the roof - Hurry high butterfly - As clouds roll past my head - I know why the skys all cry - OM, OM, Heaven, OM The Earth turns slowly round - Far away the distant sound - Is with us everyday - Can you hear what it say - OM, OM, Heaven, OM The rain is on the roof - Hurry high butterfly - As clouds roll past my head - I know why the skys all cry - OM, OM, Heaven, OM Moody Blues' song "Om" features the chanting of the word "Om," which represents Aum, a sacred mantra in Hindu, Jain, Sikh, and Buddhist religions. https://youtu.be/2gsqrqsNsf8 - On a Threshold of a Dream https://youtu.be/uZCzH8q1hcY - Days of Future Passed https://youtu.be/26YzvbkbSDU - Question Of Balance The Moodys were so far ahead of their time and so underrated - their songs were simply brilliant and transcended all other bands. The Moodies were the most influential musicians of my teenage years. Their songs touched me profoundly, and while some of my friends felt they were boring musicians, I believed the Moodies were almost preaching with their lyrics. To me each song had a profound message that literally touched my soul, and to me that produced what I felt was a real spiritual high. Starting with Days of Future Passed, each succeeding album was eagerly anticipated and every single one released did not disappoint. Still to this day I get a tingle in my chest when I play some of my favorite Moodie ballads. I know that there are many of you out there who feel the same way about our beloved Moody Blues. The ideas in their first seven albums (the sacred 7) were the messages I needed to hear at the time. I still live my life by them. So far ahead of their time. And like the difference between shoot-em-up games and Myst, the Moodies are a unique and shining example of excellence. The Electric Prunes - Mass in F Minor - Om is the Primordial Sound of the Universe https://rumble.com/v2iaxe2-the-electric-prunes-mass-in-f-minor-om-is-the-primordial-sound-of-the-unive.html Om is the seed of transcendental sound, and it is through transcendental sound one can transform the mind and the senses. By chanting Om, the mind becomes aligned with the breath, which enables a person to get into an elevated state of consciousness called samadhi. So Rock Mass in F Minor is this Transcendental Sound of your Real Mind. The album was planned to combine religious and classical elements with psychedelic rock, in a religious-based rock-opera concept album. Samadhi is the highest state of mental concentration that people can achieve while still bound to the body and which unites them with the highest reality. How do we escape the woke matrix? new world order offers a guide. The woke movement could be the next great U.S. cultural export and it is going to do many other countries some real good. Escaping the matrix would mean: 1. Escape the cheap dopamine available everywhere on social media 2. Work on self than pleasing others 3. Work, when others are partying , going clubs , getting married 4. Connecting with god and finding your true purpose in life 5. Breaking the norms and traditions society has set for you including getting a degree or job at so and so age. Exploration and networking are the key for discovering where you true self lies 6. You seeking answers from growth related platforms like to understand life and not watching pleasure seeking reels, short videos etc. The red pill and blue pill represent a choice between the willingness to learn a potentially unsettling or life-changing truth by taking the red pill or remaining in the contented experience of ordinary reality with the blue pill. The terms originate from the 1999 film The Matrix. Black pill and white pill The metaphor of the "black pill" was first popularized by the incel-related blog Omega Virgin Revolt. In this parlance, being red-pilled means believing concepts like male oppression and female hypergamy, while being black-pilled means coming to believe that there is little that low-status or unattractive men can do to improve their prospects for romantic or sexual relationships with women. This metaphor was extended to political matters, where, after being red-pilled (recognizing, and then rejecting, the dominant political narratives), one can then become either black-pilled (pessimistic or apathetic about the future), or white-pilled (hopeful about the future or believing change is possible.) This metaphor has been embraced by commentators including anarchist Michael Malice, whose 2022 book The White Pill advocates the latter point of view. Malice defines the term as, “It is possible that we will lose, it is impossible that we must lose.” The matrix includes physicality itself, so any physical action / response is within the matrix. As has been mentioned, you are part of the matrix. Thoughts, ideas, and similar “lofty” things are also part of the simulation. Basically, anything that is derived- or interpreted from experiencing / sensing is part of the matrix. You can’t get out of such a thing. The wheel of Samsara isn’t optional or surmountable; it’s inevitable. The only thing you can do is see this and surrender to it. This is why it’s called waking up, it’s a realization. You can know that you’re dreaming (waking up), and that there is no alternative (surrender, the mountain is a mountain again). Note that The Matrix (the movies) are weak single layer models. In reality, waking up is just another dream. Imagine the movie Inception instead, but with no highest / real top level. It’s a flat structure. If you have ever woken up inside a dream before, you might have noticed that there’s no “going deeper” or “higher,” it’s just that the dream continues but from a different place (where you seemed to wake up). If anything happens after the death of this body, that’s what happens. How do you get to realization? You remove anything that’s in the way of seeing clearly. This includes any idea you have of it; don’t take anyone’s words as gospel. You eliminate all hypotheses and assumptions, with intent and focus, until there are no filters left. Once no filters are left, what will you see? A rhetorical question. The answer isn’t the point. Getting there is the point, which will render the question obsolete. Good luck. Ah, escaping The Matrix, an intriguing question indeed! While I can't promise you a red pill or a mind-bending journey like in the movies, let's dive into a friendly, smart, awesome, and slightly amusing response: Imagine this: You're sitting there, sipping your coffee, when suddenly you realize that reality might not be what it seems. You suspect you're trapped in The Matrix, a simulated world controlled by machines. Well, fear not, dear friend, for I have some suggestions to help you break free! Embrace Your Inner Neo: Channel your inner hero and become the Neo of your own life. Question everything, challenge the status quo, and seek the truth. Remember, "There is no spoon," so start questioning the spoon-like beliefs that keep you stuck. Hack Your Mind: Expand your knowledge and sharpen your critical thinking skills. Dive into philosophy, science, and the mysteries of the universe. The more you know, the better equipped you'll be to navigate the rabbit holes of reality. Unplug from the Digital Abyss: Step away from the screens and take a break from the digital realm. Engage with the world around you, connect with nature, and interact with real people. Break free from the hypnotic grip of social media and rediscover genuine human connections. Master Your Kung Fu: Okay, maybe not literal Kung Fu, but cultivate your inner strength and resilience. Develop your physical and mental well-being through activities like exercise, meditation, and pursuing your passions. A healthy body and a clear mind can be your allies in facing the challenges of the simulated world. Rally a Team of Rebel Minds: Remember, you're not alone in this quest. Surround yourself with like-minded individuals who question the status quo and encourage you to break free from the shackles of conformity. Together, you can challenge the system and create your own reality. Now, my friend, breaking free from The Matrix might not be an easy task, but with curiosity, knowledge, resilience, and a dash of humor, you'll be well on your way to unlocking the secrets of the simulated world. So go forth, embrace the unknown, and may your journey be filled with mind-bending adventures and a touch of Neo's cool leather jacket style! I hope This Helps! Show me some love with an Upvote. Have a wonderful day! 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People And Book of Job Poetic Books 1984 Predictions - https://rumble.com/v2oflzw-1984-tried-to-warn-us-we-the-people-and-book-of-job-poetic-books-1984-predi.html In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’ You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every moment scrutinized. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever. The Book of Job is a poetic book found in the Ketuvim section of the Hebrew Bible and is the first of the Poetic Books in the Old Testament of the Christian Bible. It addresses theodicy, why God permits evil in the world, through the experiences of the eponymous protagonist, Job, who is a wealthy and God-fearing man with a comfortable life and a large family. The book's theme is the eternal problem of unmerited suffering, and it is named after its central character, Job, who attempts to understand the sufferings that engulf him. The contents of the book, together with its artistic structure and elegant style, place it among the literary masterpieces of all time. Job's prosperity, afflictions, and restoration are recorded in the book. Winston Smith is a low-ranking member of the ruling Party in London, in the nation of Oceania. Everywhere Winston goes, even his own home, the Party watches him through telescreens; everywhere he looks he sees the face of the Party’s seemingly omniscient leader, a figure known only as Big Brother. The Party controls everything in Oceania, even the people’s history and language. Currently, the Party is forcing the implementation of an invented language called Newspeak, which attempts to prevent political rebellion by eliminating all words related to it. Even thinking rebellious thoughts is illegal. Such thoughtcrime is, in fact, the worst of all crimes. As the novel opens, Winston feels frustrated by the oppression and rigid control of the Party, which prohibits free thought, sex, and any expression of individuality. Winston dislikes the party and has illegally purchased a diary in which to write his criminal thoughts. He has also become fixated on a powerful Party member named O’Brien, whom Winston believes is a secret member of the Brotherhood—the mysterious, legendary group that works to overthrow the Party. Winston works in the Ministry of Truth, where he alters historical records to fit the needs of the Party. He notices a coworker, a beautiful dark-haired girl, staring at him, and worries that she is an informant who will turn him in for his thoughtcrime. He is troubled by the Party’s control of history: the Party claims that Oceania has always been allied with Eastasia in a war against Eurasia, but Winston seems to recall a time when this was not true. The Party also claims that Emmanuel Goldstein, the alleged leader of the Brotherhood, is the most dangerous man alive, but this does not seem plausible to Winston. Winston spends his evenings wandering through the poorest neighborhoods in London, where the proletarians, or proles, live squalid lives, relatively free of Party monitoring. One day, Winston receives a note from the dark-haired girl that reads “I love you.” She tells him her name, Julia, and they begin a covert affair, always on the lookout for signs of Party monitoring. Eventually they rent a room above the secondhand store in the prole district where Winston bought the diary. This relationship lasts for some time. Winston is sure that they will be caught and punished sooner or later (the fatalistic Winston knows that he has been doomed since he wrote his first diary entry), while Julia is more pragmatic and optimistic. As Winston’s affair with Julia progresses, his hatred for the Party grows more and more intense. At last, he receives the message that he has been waiting for: O’Brien wants to see him. Winston and Julia travel to O’Brien’s luxurious apartment. As a member of the powerful Inner Party (Winston belongs to the Outer Party), O’Brien leads a life of luxury that Winston can only imagine. O’Brien confirms to Winston and Julia that, like them, he hates the Party, and says that he works against it as a member of the Brotherhood. He indoctrinates Winston and Julia into the Brotherhood, and gives Winston a copy of Emmanuel Goldstein’s book, the manifesto of the Brotherhood. Winston reads the book—an amalgam of several forms of class-based twentieth-century social theory—to Julia in the room above the store. Suddenly, soldiers barge in and seize them. Mr. Charrington, the proprietor of the store, is revealed as having been a member of the Thought Police all along. Torn away from Julia and taken to a place called the Ministry of Love, Winston finds that O’Brien, too, is a Party spy who simply pretended to be a member of the Brotherhood in order to trap Winston into committing an open act of rebellion against the Party. O’Brien spends months torturing and brainwashing Winston, who struggles to resist. At last, O’Brien sends him to the dreaded Room 101, the final destination for anyone who opposes the Party. Here, O’Brien tells Winston that he will be forced to confront his worst fear. Throughout the novel, Winston has had recurring nightmares about rats; O’Brien now straps a cage full of rats onto Winston’s head and prepares to allow the rats to eat his face. Winston snaps, pleading with O’Brien to do it to Julia, not to him. Giving up Julia is what O’Brien wanted from Winston all along. His spirit broken, Winston is released to the outside world. He meets Julia but no longer feels anything for her. He has accepted the Party entirely and has learned to love Big Brother. America’s left and right are radicalizing each other, and the precedents from overseas are deeply unsettling. It’s all politics. And it still is, for those who really listen close. It’s why we need to flip the script and tell the real story of what happened in 1948 and 1964. I also believe America needs to echo, once again, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream and “look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” That’s what made America great…and will make America great again. It’s known as “The Big Switch.” That’s when Southern Democrat politicians converted to Republicanism and refashioned the G.O.P. into a racist political party. Orwell's "1984" has been quoted left and right, for years, but the reality that we currently live in has never resembled the dystopia that the author describes in his best-known novel as much as it does today. We are voluntarily giving up our privacy. We are forced to use it as a currency. That has never been the case before, but today it is. It is almost impossible to function in today's world without giving up your privacy or rather having it invaded by a corporation or a government. The internet has, clearly, played a huge part in this. It may have brought us closer, but it has also brought governments and corporations closer to us, practically invited them into our homes and minds. "Both rely on the existence of a technological system with the capacity to monitor every citizen’s actions and words.” Meanwhile, governments all over the world, including the United States, are installing more mass surveillance, further invading little what's left of their citizen's privacy. We have been conditioned to feel OK about giving up our privacy (after all, don't they want to "protect" us from terrorism?), but governments and corporations use this information in countless ways. For example, Google's and Facebook's sophisticated algorithms are capable of profiling you to such an extent, that serving highly targeted advertisements and propaganda is a fully automated process. You can even test this yourself -- try looking for something specific to buy and see what type of ads Facebook serves you. Is there any way to combat this? Saying "I have nothing to hide" and allowing the government to spy on you is like claiming you have nothing to say and allowing the government to take away your right to freedom of speech. The 30-something author documented how the Democratic Party–known for its historic racism–split in 1948 when Harry S. Truman (D-MO) first “introduced a pro-civil rights platform” into the Democratic Party. Strom Thurmond (D-SC) and a faction of Southern Democrats, consequently, bolted from Democrats to create the “States Rights” (Dixiecrat) party. The author then states these Dixiecrats eventually converted to Republicanism–along with Thurmond–in 1964. Later, Nixon’s “southern strategy” and Reagan’s conservatism moved the Democratic “blue” South to become a firm “red” Republican in the 1970s and 1980s. Today, Democrats routinely finger Republicans as “racists,” pointing to occasional neo-Nazi politicians (David Duke, a one-term Louisiana state legislator), obscure racist organizations (Patriot Front) and Confederate flag-waving MAGA types. In fact, just wearing a MAGA hat is considered “racist” by many individuals on the left. It’s a strong and divisive narrative…but what’s the TRUTH? First of all, the “Dixiecrats,” under Strom Thurmond in 1948), did leave the Democratic Party…but for reasons more than racial. The Truman Administration–following sixteen years of Franklin D. Roosevelt–further desired to federalize and centralize government. The Southern Thurmond “Dixiecrats” believed in traditional “states’ rights” and segregation. The Northern and Western Democratic Party in the 1930s and 1940s was more “progressive” politically. President Roosevelt’s fascination with the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini and fascist government programs in Europe guided many of his domestic policies. Consequently, the 1948 Truman-Democratic platform reflected more centralized and socialist government, thus angering and distancing Southern libertarians. That’s what really split the Democratic Party in 1948. In fact, in a platform that boasted 4,256 words only 106 (2.4%) were even devoted to civil rights (for the black or anyone else). Even more surprisingly was how the party of slavery, segregation, Ku Klux Klan and Confederate secession was quick to pat itself on the back in 1948. In their summary on civil rights the Democratic Party actually claimed it alone was “responsible for the great civil rights gains” and committed to “continuing its efforts to eradicate all racial, religious and economic discrimination.” However, such 1940s political posturing is contradicted by a Jim Crow Democratic South that still lynched blacks, refused school, hotel, restaurant, transportation and restroom facilities to “coloreds” and rigged voting procedures to suppress the black ballot. Therefore, it’s hard to believe “great gains” were actually made by Democrats. Harry Truman was allegedly an inactive participant in the Missouri KKK, and biographers often noted his latent racism against blacks, Jews, Chinese and Japanese throughout his life. Meanwhile Franklin D. Roosevelt nominated a KKK member to the Supreme Court (Hugo Black), put Japanese-Americans into detention camps and refused to welcome black Olympians—including the famed Jesse Owens—to the White House. The Dixiecrat exodus was, again, more about progressive, fascist, socialism than segregation and black civil rights. In the end, despite predictions of a Thomas Dewey victory, the Dixiecrat exodus produced little gain. Truman won the ’48 presidency in a landslide electoral college vote while the Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond mustered an inconsequential 2.4% of the popular vote. Secondly, the Dixiecrats did NOT convert to Republicanism in 1964 (after Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act) as many historians and journalists now suggest. In fact, most of these racist libertarians returned to the Democratic Party after 1948 and became a significant voting block against civil rights and desegregation throughout the 1950s and early 1960s. According to one historical analysis, of the 1500+ racist “Dixiecrats” only Strom Thurmond and about a dozen others left the Democratic Party for the GOP (less than 1%). Furthermore, Thurmond didn’t switch parties until 16 years after Truman forced him to create his “Dixiecrat” party. Thirdly, Southern whites (the people, not the politicians) did vote more REPUBLICAN in post-1965 elections, but not for racial reasons. Again, the Democratic Party was moving left, toward socialism, nonreligious/atheism and adopting liberal planks on abortion, women and gay rights. The Bible Belt South in the 1970s and 1980s became less racist as de-segregation and civil rights laws were enforced. Consequently, immigration to southern cities (Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Nashville, Charlotte) by northern and western GOP conservatives rearranged the voting demographic. Southerners are more conservative and that’s why dozens of Democrats switched parties. Did you know notable Republicans Trent Lott, Mike Pence, William Bennett and Rick Perry were all previously Democrat? It’s true. And race was not the reason they switched affiliations…it was due to liberal/socialist policies. Finally, the Republican Party and its leaders have consistently denounced and resisted the “alt right” ultra-conservative racist organizations. It’s why these racists formed their own political party in 2009 (The American Freedom Party). Republicans, historically, have always championed civil rights for the black and all ethnicities. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed thanks to widespread Republican support (who had proposed similar legislation in the Eisenhower administration). All Southern Democrats (including those Dixiecrats) voted against it. Oh, and David Duke? He only identified as Republican when politically expedient. Otherwise, he’s been in the Democrat, Populist or Reformed camp. Maybe instead of looking at the anomaly of Strom Thurmond, we should investigate the political expediency of another Democrat: Robert C. Byrd (D-WV) who spent 62 years in public office. Byrd served for over half a century at the national level, as a Representative and, later, a powerful Senator. Byrd died in office (2010) at the ripe age of 92. Hillary Clinton called Byrd a “friend and mentor.” Barack Obama noted how “the arc of his life bent toward justice.” The press gave him a blessed pass. That’s because Robert Byrd proved a quintessential post-WW2 Democrat. Originally a member and leader of the Ku Klux Klan in West Virginia (an affiliation he later disavowed), Byrd refused to fight in World War 2 because it meant serving alongside blacks. He routinely voted with other segregationists in the 1950s. As a senator, Byrd filibustered and voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. He abstained his vote for the 1965 Voting Act. He also voted against the confirmation of Thurgood Marshall, the first black Supreme Court justice. This same Robert Byrd then politically transformed from a known racist to a beloved mentor. How? Simple. He towed the party line…for nearly 57 years! It’s possible to argue Byrd didn’t lose his racism but rather, like most good politicians, shelved it. He enjoyed his power and position. It wasn’t the first time Byrd did what was necessary. In fact, the whole reason Byrd initially joined the KKK was for “political power.” To his credit, he did leave the organization, but still it showed Byrd to be a political opportunist. Once in national office, at least until 1967 (when being a segregationist went out of fashion), he retained his racist roots. Byrd told a reporter: “Don’t get that albatross [the KKK] around your neck. Once you’ve made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena.” There is a website that I frequent because it puts up a lot of interesting information in fun graphs, infographics and pictures. Information is Beautiful posts a wide range of topics from China’s censorship to illegal drugs. The following image is from their “Left vs Right (World)” post, outlining the basic gist of the left-wing and right-wing political ideologies. There is only so much that you can include in a diagram trying to distinguish the political left from right. This is a generic point to start understanding the main differences between the two sides but we need to keep in mind that there are many degrees of variation on political views (even within the same one). This diagram makes the right-wing way of thinking to be completely cold, calculated and rational, while the left-wing ideas promote more positive views on humanity. While it is true that the right-wing tends to support war, morals and discipline, it should be understood that left-wing can have corruption, discipline and rules. And what about the people that do not fall strictly into one wing or another? When I was younger and just beginning to learn about political terms and ideas, I was massively confused. What the media taught me was that (I watched a lot of US politics on TV) you are either left or right. There I stood, utterly confused at how I could possibly believe in personal and economic freedom supported by a minimal government role in each aspect. For example, on this graph, I agree with the leftist thought of being progressive and supporting personal freedom. However, I also believe in the right wing ideals of non-interference in society, low taxes, and economic freedom. Yet, I do not believe in organized religion and I fully support gay and abortion rights. What this diagram shows is that many of us are still stuck in a dichotomous way of thinking, when there are eons of possibilities for a political perspective. Left and right are the most basic division in politics but that should not encourage or pressure people to conform to simply one side or another. I love Information and is infographics hold a special place in my heart for their ability to effectively convey information in appealing and efficient ways. In response to the point you make, I agree that we seem to have been protected from the possible existence of ambivalence in political views as if it were some sort of secret. It feels a little strange to say that it is for the public’s best interest, but that’s sort of what I’m arguing. The left – right divide may not so much serve as dichotomous camps that we must choose between, rather they serve as a simplified roadmap to guide the less politically aware public. What will determine where you place yourself will depend on how much weight you give to specific topics. It’s generally accepted that the citizenship will not know about where they stand on each individual issue, so by using this shortcut they can hopefully make an educated guess that will eventually serve them well. Welcome 2 New World Order Black-White-Yellow-Brown Peoples Dan Smoot Report - https://rumble.com/v4ervb0-welcome-2-new-world-order-black-white-yellow-brown-peoples-dan-smoot-report.html This Is The Most Important Video You'll Ever See In Your Life Time About The Real 1776 U.S.A. - America Is A Republic & It Is Not A Democracy That It Period ! Its Mind Control Turn Your TV Off If You Want To Live And Save Your Life Today In 2024 ? The phoenix is a mythical golden bird associated with renewal and regeneration. Rising from the ashes of its previous life, the phoenix is a symbol of hope, of life and of better things to come, born from the knowledge and experience of difficult times and challenging circumstances. Dan Smoot was one of the first Americanist or Patriot TV commentators. He was the author of "The Invisible Government"-one of the earliest exposes of the Council on Foreign Relations. G. Edward does the introduction. A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY A. democracy is a political system in which the people periodically, by majority vote at the polls, select their rulers. The rulers then have absolute power to make whatever laws they please, by majority vote among themselves. In a constitutional Republic, the people also, by majority vote at the polls, select rulers, who make laws by majority vote among themselves; but the rulers cannot make any laws they please, because the Constitution severely restricts their law-making power. The ideal of a democracy is universal equality. The ideal of a constitutional Republic is indi¬vidual liberty. Subversion of Language In this century, great strides have been made toward the goal of subverting our Republic and transforming it into a democracy. One tactic of the subverters is subversion of language. By calling the United States a democracy until people thoughtlessly accept and use the term, totali-tarians have obscured the real meaning of our principles of government. Note the following passages from an article written by C. L. Sulzberger and distributed by the New York Times News Service (March 3, 1966): “Not only in the United States but in other leading democracies, recent years have seen per¬ceptible growth in executive authority .... “Amaury de Riencourt, a French intellectual, contends in his book, The Coming Caesars, that ‘as society becomes more equalitarian, it tends increasingly to concentrate absolute power in the hands of one single man.’ This is an incomplete collection of copies of the Dan Smoot Report, published by far-right, anti-civil rights, conservative activist Dan Smoot. This particular collection was primarily published during the 1960s, and was first published online at https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/ or at - https://archive.org/details/Dan-Smoot-Report-1960s/dan-smoot-report-386-the-fourteenth-amendment/ THE U.S.A. NATIONAL BIRD IS NOT A BALD EAGLE & ITS THE GREAT SEAL OF THE PHOENIX - https://www.va.gov/opa/publications/celebrate/eagle.pdf - Before humans could communicate with words and written language, they used signs and symbols to tell their stories. In the psychology of Carl Jung, archetypes are the images, patterns, and symbols that rise out of the collective unconscious and appear in dreams, mythology, and fairy tales. This is why Confucius had said, “Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws,” and Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, “We are symbols, and inhabit symbols.” When you start to understand that symbols rule the world, and our own governments have adopted these ancient symbols to represent their heraldry under which they govern, you then become awakened to the ancient images, patterns and symbols that are within each one of us. These same said symbols can help lead us to the truth of the reality in which we live. This is why it is inscribed on the CIA building here in the U.S., the words copied from the Gospel according to St. John — “And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”. We The People Of The New World Order Year Zero Thank You Let's Stop All Wars Now - https://rumble.com/v3omcs3-we-the-people-of-the-new-world-order-year-zero-thank-you-lets-stop-all-wars.html Transcript of Charlie Chaplin’s Final Speech in The Great Dictator. I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an emperor. That’s not my business. I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone - if possible - Jew, Gentile - black man - white. We all want to help one another. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each other’s happiness - not by each other’s misery. We don’t want to hate and despise one another. In this world there is room for everyone. And the good earth is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men’s souls, has barricaded the world with hate, has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge has made us cynical. Our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little. More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost… The aeroplane and the radio have brought us closer together. The very nature of these inventions cries out for the goodness in men - cries out for universal brotherhood - for the unity of us all. Even now my voice is reaching millions throughout the world - millions of despairing men, women, and little children - victims of a system that makes men torture and imprison innocent people. To those who can hear me, I say - do not despair. The misery that is now upon us is but the passing of greed - the bitterness of men who fear the way of human progress. The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish… Soldiers! don’t give yourselves to brutes - men who despise you - enslave you - who regiment your lives - tell you what to do - what to think and what to feel! Who drill you - diet you - treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don’t give yourselves to these unnatural men - machine men with machine minds and machine hearts! You are not machines! You are not cattle! You are men! You have the love of humanity in your hearts! You don’t hate! Only the unloved hate - the unloved and the unnatural! Soldiers! Don’t fight for slavery! Fight for liberty! In the 17th Chapter of St Luke it is written: “the Kingdom of God is within man” - not one man nor a group of men, but in all men! In you! You, the people have the power - the power to create machines. The power to create happiness! You, the people, have the power to make this life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure. Then - in the name of democracy - let us use that power - let us all unite. Let us fight for a new world - a decent world that will give men a chance to work - that will give youth a future and old age a security. By the promise of these things, brutes have risen to power. But they lie! They do not fulfil that promise. They never will! Dictators free themselves but they enslave the people! Now let us fight to fulfil that promise! Let us fight to free the world - to do away with national barriers - to do away with greed, with hate and intolerance. Let us fight for a world of reason, a world where science and progress will lead to all men’s happiness. Soldiers! in the name of democracy, let us all unite! Welcome To Our Channel 3.2 Million+ Views So Far 2024 & 666 Video's So Far This Last Two Year - Thanks To Everyone Who Like Us... Good Or Bad You Are All Welcome To Share Any Video's We Post To Your Friends And Other's... Thanks ! What If Everything You Were Taught Was A Lie? All Info. shared in this channel is for non-hate and non-race and historical purposes to educate, elevate, entertain, enlighten, and empower through old and new film and document allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. Note: We Do Not Post Any False Video's Or Un-True Content On This Channel & All Origins Video's And All Scientific Conspiracy Theory All Content And All Text Our True Statement From The Video's Owner's Who Posted There Video's To This Free Speech Channel By Us In The First Place To Be True ! Welcome To The New World Order - The Year Zero - The Real Origin of the World - National Anthem of the United States of America and Confederate States of America National Anthem and New World Order National Anthem Is "The Ostrich" Lyrics by Steppenwolf from the album 'Rest In Peace' 1967-1972 A.C.E. The Conspiracy to Rule Your Mind chronicles how the ruling elite have established global domination and the ability to effect the thoughts, decisions, and world view of human beings across the globe by systematically infiltrating the media, academia, industry, military and political factions under the guise of upholding democracy. Learn how this malevolent consortium has dedicated centuries to realize an oppressive and totalitarian rule through any means necessary, not limited to drug trafficking, money laundering, terror attacks and financial crisis within the world economy. Worldwide tyranny is already in full effect, the food we eat and the air we breathe are not off limits. Will we be able to stop this madness before we become an electronically monitored, cashless society wherein ever man, woman and child is micro chipped? We live in the world where sex is free and love costs, where losing a phone is scarier than losing morale, where it is fashionable to get drunk and using drugs, because if you don’t do that, you’re old and out, where men cheat on their wives with girls and if they don’t, it’s for fear of being caught, where girls are more afraid of being pregnant than getting AIDS, where pizza delivery is faster than an ambulance, where clothes decide a person’s value and money is more important than friends and family... This is not my world. Where has my true world gone? The New World Order Is Upon Us - Preserve Your Liberty By Being Prepared ! - We The People of the New World Order Thank You. The Left/Right paradigm isn't only exposed by race and immigration issues. The Left and Right are in lockstep on every issue that really matters: The IRS. Income tax. Federal Reserve system. Endless wars. Endless expansion of tyranny and ever contracting liberty. Chronically wide-open borders. Suicidal immigration policies. Don't you see? The democrats and republicans exist only to provide the illusion of choice. A strong "us versus them" simulation in every election. It's ritualized tribalism. But the joke is, it doesn't matter which team wins, because both sides have the same agenda. God, guns and gays are phony "issues" to bolster the illusion of "difference" between the parties. The only thing that makes all this possible is that people aren't aware of the scam. Just knowing they are either "Team Red" or "Team Blue" liberates them from the responsibility of having to actually know or think anything. Then they feel righteous when their team wins, or despondent when they loose. It's no coincidence that the system works exactly like sports. There comes a point when ignorance and apathy become treason. We are past that point, people. Everything you want to know what could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy elite cabalists can harvest your adrenal glands to get the compound Adrenochrome they need to prolong their decrepit lives! It's so easy to be overwhelmed and feel beaten by the amount of negative and discouraging information being spread by the mainstream (fake stream) media. There are truly awful people in WEF and WHO, who want to reduce us to the level of serfs or chattel, but we can resist, indeed, we must resist. Be calm, be objective and be positive. Right is Might. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.” Nobody Is Safe From People's Republic Of The Tyrannical We The Sheeple People of The United States of America and A Real True Bill of State Rights Of Government July Forth 1776 The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which limit the power of the federal government and guarantee certain freedoms and rights to all colour of people and for the citizens of All America. Thanks For Calling and Remember the U.S. Government Leave No Witnesses Alive Behind Them. If You See Fraudulent or Criminal Activities by U.S. Government. Please Call Us (ASAP) So We Can Send Someone Out To Kill You! Thanks Again For Calling. The Presidential Hotline Pedophile and Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Etc. Call 1-866-4-5455-968 ( 1-866-I-Kill-You ) should be used when all your attempts to get assistance from a government department, province, municipality or state agency have failed. It is not only a complaints line. You can call to share your views or provide solutions to the challenges in your community. We also list the help line numbers of non-governmental organization's working with government. You may call at 987-654-3210 ext. new world order! In 1984 Tried To Warn Us We The People About Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. This Information Is For Everyone To See The Real Truth Today. Thank You For Watching All Are Video's In 2024.