PETA Moral Consequentialism
1 year ago
21
What in the world does a non-Christian PETA (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) rep mean when he says right or wrong when they believe we are ultimately a cosmic accident and there is no God? Don’t let them squirm away from an objective standard of right and wrong. I hope this apologetic helps.
Loading comments...
-
14:36
Bible News Prophecy
1 year agoPETA's Preposterous Preaching
54 -
13:33
End Time Headlines
1 year agoWhat PETA Just Did To The Bible Should Concern You
470 -
58:47
Convincing Proof
1 year agoMetaethics (What Makes Something Morally Good or Bad? Part 1)
27 -
57:51
ProgressiveVoices
1 year agoIt’s All About Food- Jonathan Leighton, The Tango of Ethics, Intuition, Rationality, and the Prevent
14 -
10:37
TheLandAndTheBible
9 months agoJordan Peterson: Is Morality Objective or Not? #reaction
171 -
5:22
Payton Pearson
1 year agoMorality is Civilization ITSELF
15 -
39:59
touchdown8
3 months ago1013 1 Pet.2.11-25 Keeping Good Behaviour While Suffering Unjustly
2 -
14:02
The Lotus Eaters
1 year agoMoral Dogmatism, Fanaticism & Scepticism
4191 -
1:16:18
AGF Brakpan Sermons
7 months agoChristian Ethics
19 -
3:45
wearelibertarians
9 months ago"Is it imperative to have a moral society for libertarianism to work?